I have two brand new never used I'm trying to get rid of make an offer
off list and they are probably yours.
Thank You,
Cameron Kilton
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
I need some advise, I have been using Tranzeo's for years and have some peers
that really like the UBNT products so I have picked up a bunch of NS2, NS2loco,
and Power Station's. I have had some great results here at first and my
installers love them.
HOWEVER, the more I watch them the more,
Hi,
Has anyone tested the new Ubiquiti 2.4ghz MIMO stuff? I am specifically
interested in the NLOS capabilities of this product.
Or, has anyone tested the Ubiquiti 5ghz MIMO stuff in ptmp compared with
Canopy for NLOS? I'm just curious how much the OFDM and MIMO helps with
NLOS (trees).
Travi
I have an M5 bullet in station bridge mode. This is connected on the
ethernet side to an MT router.
Thru another port on the MT router I am nating an office. The office
computers work fine.
I am now trying to route a small subnet to another port on the MT router
in order to feed a local acces
Wondering if anyone has an opinion good/bad on the Ubiquity PowerBridgeM5.
Need it for a 12 mile link with heavy traffic. Bridged with OSPF pass through.
Something better. Also Looked at the LigoWave LigoPTP5-23 MiMo but prefer
UBNT price.
Steve Barnes
RC-WiFi Wireless Internet Service
Hi Faisal and the list
We have also been using UBNT quite a bit lately over the last couple of years.
I’m anxious to try some of the 900 and 3.65 when the time is right.
Nano 2 and Nano 5 have been in our arsenal for as long as they have been out.
Never had a lick of trouble with them othe
We've had numerous storms here over the past couple of weeks. We have
replaced a box full of Nano and Bullets. This leads me to believe that
our install practices might be improved. How are others grounding these
units effectively?
Thanks
Chris
Intelliwave
I remember (I think) reading on this forum about how to use a UBNT radio as a
repeater (not WDS) by leaving the SSID blank and choosing Station mode. Can
anyone tell me how to do that? I'm near an open network (no encryption) and I
have permission to extend it. Can't do WDS, the existing AP does
Anyone test this yet?
http://www.ubnt.com/rocketmgps
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
WISPA Wireless List: wire
Which UBNT 2.4 or 5.7 radios will do 45MB duplex over two miles.
Thanks
Akinlolu C. Ajayi-Obe
AS Technologies Ltd
Tel. 234(0)8023258027
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--
None will do true full duplex. Any of the M series should do it over 40
MHz channel size.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 9/23/2011 12:04 PM, Akinlolu C. Ajayi-Obe wrote:
> Which UBNT 2.4 or 5.7 radios will do 45MB duplex over two miles.
> Thanks
> A
Duplex != full duplex
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
> None will do true full duplex. Any of the M series should do it over 40
> MHz channel size.
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Inte
@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT
Which UBNT 2.4 or 5.7 radios will do 45MB duplex over two miles.
Thanks
Akinlolu C. Ajayi-Obe
AS Technologies Ltd
Tel. 234(0)8023258027
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http
ptember 23, 2011 12:05 PM
> To: wireless@wispa.org
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT
>
> Which UBNT 2.4 or 5.7 radios will do 45MB duplex over two miles.
> Thanks
> Akinlolu C. Ajayi-Obe
> AS Technologies Ltd
> Tel. 234(0)8023258027
>
>
> --
w.linktechs.net/AF2011_Bakeoff.pdf
> >
> > Jim
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
> > [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> > Behalf Of Akinlolu C. Ajayi-Obe
> > Sent: Friday, September 23, 2011 12:05 PM
> > T
> >
> > www.linktechs.net/AF2011_Bakeoff.pdf
> >
> > Jim
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
> > [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> > Behalf Of Akinlolu C. Ajayi-Obe
> > Sent: Friday, September 23
.@wispa.org]
> On
> Behalf Of Akinlolu C. Ajayi-Obe
> Sent: Friday, September 23, 2011 12:05 PM
> To: wireless@wispa.org
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT
>
> Which UBNT 2.4 or 5.7 radios will do 45MB duplex over two miles.
> Thanks
> Akinlolu C.
gt;>> Here is a radio comparison test done at the last animal farm.
>>>
>>> www.linktechs.net/AF2011_Bakeoff.pdf
>>>
>>> Jim
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
>>> [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.
adio comparison test done at the last animal farm.
>>
>> www.linktechs.net/AF2011_Bakeoff.pdf
>>
>> Jim
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
>> On
>> Behalf Of Akinlolu C. Ajayi-Obe
>>
org]
>> On
>> Behalf Of Akinlolu C. Ajayi-Obe
>> Sent: Friday, September 23, 2011 12:05 PM
>> To: wireless@wispa.org
>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT
>>
>> Which UBN
rm.
>>>
>>> www.linktechs.net/AF2011_Bakeoff.pdf
>>>
>>> Jim
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
>>> On
>>> Behalf Of Akinlolu C. Ajayi-Obe
>>>
> >>> Here is a radio comparison test done at the last animal farm.
> >>>
> >>> www.linktechs.net/AF2011_Bakeoff.pdf
> >>>
> >>> Jim
> >>>
> >>> -Original Message-
> >>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
>
inktechs.net/AF2011_Bakeoff.pdf
>>>>
>>>> Jim
>>>>
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
>>>> On
>
animal farm.
>>>>>
>>>>> www.linktechs.net/AF2011_Bakeoff.pdf
>>>>>
>>>>> Jim
>>>>>
>>>>> ---
September 23, 2011 12:05 PM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT
Which UBNT 2.4 or 5.7 radios will do 45MB duplex over two miles.
Thanks
Akinlolu C. Ajayi-Obe
AS Technologies Ltd
Tel. 234(0)8023258027
---
---
--
--
+100!
Sent from my BlackBerry®
-Original Message-
From: Matt Larsen - Lists
Sender: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 16:53:05
To: WISPA General List
Reply-To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT
gt; Reply-To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT
>
>
>
>
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> --
ent: Friday, September 23, 2011 12:05 PM
To:wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT
Which UBNT 2.4 or 5.7 radios will do 45MB duplex over two miles.
Thanks
Akinlolu C. Ajayi-Obe
AS Technologies Ltd
Tel. 234(0)8023258027
---
---
--
--
-boun...@wispa.org
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
On
Behalf Of Akinlolu C. Ajayi-Obe
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2011 12:05 PM
To:wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT
Which UBNT 2.4 or 5.7 radios will do 45MB duplex over two miles.
Thanks
Akinlolu C. Ajayi-Obe
A
ember 23, 2011 12:05 PM
To:wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT
Which UBNT 2.4 or 5.7 radios will do 45MB duplex over two miles.
Thanks
Akinlolu C. Ajayi-Obe
AS Technologies Ltd
Tel. 234(0)8023258027
---
---
--
WISPA W
The Motorola canopy is one of the best equipment I've ever used. I have a 7
year old link that has never faltered. Upgraded the firmware twice but that's
about it. Only problems the price. Trying UBNT because of Mikrotiks success. I
usually prefer to pay for technology rather than buying cheap a
Keeping a link active versus maintaining throughput under divers conditions is
two different things. For the money paid I would go with something like
Alvarion. But then again, after 12 years, I would not invest big dollars in
CPE or Access points. Only in the backhauls and infrastructures.
At 9/25/2011 02:23 PM, Robert Canary wrote:
>Keeping a link active versus maintaining throughput under divers
>conditions is two different things. For the money paid I would go
>with something like Alvarion. But then again, after 12 years, I
>would not invest big dollars in CPE or Access points
Thank you, that's the most (and the best) info I have gotten on the UBNT from
anyone.
Could you explain what the "MCS is, and why one would use it?
Robert Canary
OCDirect Electrical-Datacomm
(866) 594-0786 Fax
(270) 955-0362 Voice
- Original Message -
> At 9/25/2011 02:23 PM, Robert Can
At 9/25/2011 06:31 PM, Robert Canary wrote:
>Thank you, that's the most (and the best) info I have gotten on the
>UBNT from anyone.
>
>Could you explain what the "MCS is, and why one would use it?
MCS means "modulation and coding scheme". You can see the list of 32
MCS options in this Wiki arti
dDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Canary"
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2011 6:31 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT
> Thank you, that's the most (and the best) info I have gott
Actually, let me be more clear
The Wikipedia chart lists the first 802.11N MCS0-32 modes standard.
The heading "spacial streams" is somewhat mislabeled, and really means "data
spacial streams", infering that additiaonl data streams can be enabled if
they are spacially apart to allow it. But
Is there a simple command or option for viewing re-tx and errors on the
wireless interface for troubleshooting purposes?
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--
What's the difference in performance between a powerbridge and and airbridge on
a 2mile 20MB link.
Akinlolu C. Ajayi-Obe
AS Technologies Ltd
Tel. 234(0)8023258027
--
This e-mail and any attachments are intended solely for the use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain legally privil
What's an airbridge?
On Mar 5, 2012, at 1:31, "Akinlolu C. Ajayi-Obe"
wrote:
> What's the difference in performance between a powerbridge and and airbridge
> on a 2mile 20MB link.
>
>
> Akinlolu C. Ajayi-Obe
> AS Technologies Ltd
> Tel. 234(0)8023258027
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> This e-mail
My error. Airmax Nanobridge.
--Original Message--
From: Matt Hoppes
To: aajayi...@as-technologies.com
To: WISPA General List
Cc: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT
Sent: Mar 5, 2012 9:04 AM
What's an airbridge?
On Mar 5, 2012, at 1:31, "Akinlolu C. Ajayi-Ob
hnologies.com
> To: WISPA General List
> Cc: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT
> Sent: Mar 5, 2012 9:04 AM
>
> What's an airbridge?
>
>
>
> On Mar 5, 2012, at 1:31, "Akinlolu C. Ajayi-Obe"
> wrote:
>
>> What's the dif
n
writing by way of letter or facsimile
-Original Message-
From: Faisal Imtiaz
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 08:30:04
To: aajayi...@as-technologies.com; WISPA General
List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT
Hehe. ... The same difference, as the weight difference in weight of 1kg of
water vs.
t be relied upon by the recipient in any way unless otherwise
> confirmed in writing by way of letter or facsimile
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Faisal Imtiaz
> Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 08:30:04
> To: aajayi...@as-technologies.com; WISPA
> General List
> Subje
e
> confirmed in writing by way of letter or facsimile
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Faisal Imtiaz
> Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 08:30:04
> To: aajayi...@as-technologies.com; WISPA
> General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT
>
> Hehe. ... The same difference, as the we
Don't bother with the airbridge.
Use the Powerbridge. It will perform better and scale up better
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 10:31 PM, Akinlolu C. Ajayi-Obe <
aajayi...@as-technologies.com> wrote:
> What's the difference in performance between a powerbridge and and
> airbridge on a 2mile 20MB link.
>
ied upon by the recipient in any way unless otherwise
> confirmed in writing by way of letter or facsimile
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Faisal Imtiaz
> Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 08:30:04
> To: aajayi...@as-technologies.com; WISPA
> General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA]
powerbridge.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Akinlolu C. Ajayi-Obe"
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 1:31 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT
What's the difference in pe
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 12:14:26PM -0500, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
> But then again, both PBM5 and your RM5+Antenna are very likely to be an
> over kill for a 2mile 20meg links, and would need to have power turned
> down, unless there are some other Fresnel zone issues or a high noise floor.
Tight b
facsimile
-Original Message-
From: Scott Lambert
Sender: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 14:26:30
To: WISPA General List
Reply-To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 12:14:26PM -0500, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
> But then again, both PBM5 and your RM
I deployed my first Bullet5 today. Not the high power, but the standard.
throughput testing showed insignificant difference between my Star-OS/WAR1
combo and the Bullet. The AP shows that the Bullet has active compression
and fast frames that functions with my star-os access point.
I have n
I'm having issues with OSPF (Mikrotik) traversing an Airmax sector.
Network consists of a Routerboard running 4.1, connected to a Rocket
sector running XM.v5.1. Client radio is a Nanostation also running
XM.v5.1, connected to a Routerboard running 4.2. The first routerboard
has a number of ospf nei
I've always ignored CCQ. I have found no rhyme or reason when comparing it
to the speed tests or latency to the CPEs.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
“Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue
that cou
Same here. I just tweak the power settings until the speed tests get
the best results. I do notice that the CCQ usually comes up after a
while.
-RickG
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Josh Luthman
wrote:
> I've always ignored CCQ. I have found no rhyme or reason when comparing it
> to the speed
, February 15, 2010 2:20 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT NS2
Same here. I just tweak the power settings until the speed tests get
the best results. I do notice that the CCQ usually comes up after a
while.
-RickG
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Josh Luthman
wrote:
> I'v
502-722-9292
> ch...@shelbybb.com
> http://www.shelbybb.com
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of RickG
> Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010 2:20 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA
Change both the Ap & CPE (Ubiquity) from reguar to WDS mode...
(WDS is the transparent bridge mode on these units).
Faisal.
On 3/31/2010 3:14 PM, Data Technology wrote:
> I have an M5 bullet in station bridge mode. This is connected on the
> ethernet side to an MT router.
> Thru another port on
The AP is MT but I don't think that is a problem. MT and UBNT wds work
together best I remember.
What is the down side to using WDS on the AP?
Will the other users on the AP have any performance issues due to using WDS?
LaRoy McCann
Data Technology
Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
> Change both the Ap & CP
Is the subnet outside the scope of the ip range the bullet is on? In other
words is the bullet on a /24 for example and does the subnet fall within that
/24?
Greg
On Mar 31, 2010, at 2:44 PM, Data Technology wrote:
> I have an M5 bullet in station bridge mode. This is connected on the
> ether
If one end is WDS AP and the other end (the bullet) is WDS Station then there
won't be any issues. If you set the bullet to WDS AP as well then you'll half
your throughput.
Greg
On Mar 31, 2010, at 3:08 PM, Data Technology wrote:
> The AP is MT but I don't think that is a problem. MT and UBNT
Completely different subnets.
AP x.x.x.65/26 (64-127) Bridged Bullet x.x.x.126/26 Local MT
x.x.x.125/26
Trying to route x.x.x.192/28 (192-207) from AP to Local MT x.x.x.125
LaRoy McCann
Data Technology
Greg Ihnen wrote:
> Is the subnet outside the scope of the ip range the bullet is on?
That does not matter, the Bullet is in bridge mode.
Regards
Michael Baird
> Is the subnet outside the scope of the ip range the bullet is on? In other
> words is the bullet on a /24 for example and does the subnet fall within that
> /24?
>
> Greg
> On Mar 31, 2010, at 2:44 PM, Data Technology wr
Shouldn't matter bridged, I've got different networks running through bridged
bullets and not in WDS.
-- Original Message --
From: Data Technology
Reply-To: WISPA General List
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 15:09:57 -0500
>Completely different subnets.
>
>AP x.
Yeah, that brings back bad memories. I did that once(wds ap mode) and
had nothing but problems.
I will try the wds station mode and see how that works.
LaRoy McCann
Data Technology
Greg Ihnen wrote:
> If one end is WDS AP and the other end (the bullet) is WDS Station then there
> won't be any
One thing I have noticed is that when I ping the local MT box
(x.x.x.125) ip from the AP I get a reply and I also see icmp traffic on
the local MT with torch. If I ping the ip of the subnet that I am
trying to route to the local MT box (x.x.x.194) I get several reply's
back from x.x.x.126 whic
I had a similar situation recently that I never figured out.
WRAP/StarOS on a tower and for some reason the CM9 radio card would no
longer connect to the source for backhaul. So, I added a BM5 in bridge
mode to the ethernet port. All the clients on the StarOS/WRAP worked
great but I could no longer
Pretty pricey, $265 each retail. They aren't available on the market yet
either, I'd be careful about being an early adopter with Ubiquiti gear.
Regards
Michael Baird
> Wondering if anyone has an opinion good/bad on the Ubiquity PowerBridgeM5.
>
> Need it for a 12 mile link with heavy traffic. Br
We've had issues with Ubiquiti and OSPF. We've had to move some sites
to BGP to fix the problem.
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
Climbing Network Support
From: Steve Barnes
Reply-To: WISPA General List
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 16:18:24 -0400
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] UBNT PowerBridgeM5
Wondering if anyone has an opinion good/bad on the Ubiquity PowerBridgeM5.
Need it for a 12 mile link with heavy traffic
The problem is resolvable, that issue is caused by the multicast kernel
module they load.
I believe it should be resolved in the next firmware iteration, rather
then having to manually unload the module.
Regards
Michael Baird
> We've had issues with Ubiquiti and OSPF. We've had to move some si
I have better luck with
a parabolic type antenna be it grid or dish.
Bob-
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Steve Barnes
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 4:18 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] UBNT PowerBridgeM5
Is PowerBridge vs. NanoBridge just panel vs. dish?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: "Robert West"
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 3:32 PM
To: "'WISPA General List'&qu
-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 4:36 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT PowerBridgeM5
Is PowerBridge vs. NanoBridge just panel vs. dish?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-i
Not to mention running 40MHz channels long range at 25dbi.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 4:36 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT PowerBridgeM5
Is
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
>
>
> --
> From: "Robert West"
> Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 3:32 PM
> To: "'WISPA General List'"
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT PowerBridgeM5
>
>
>> I wouldn't go with a panel antenna at tha
et Service
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Robert West
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 4:33 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT PowerBridgeM5
I wouldn't go with a panel antenna at that range.
Same firmware.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Steve Barnes
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 5:15 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT PowerBridgeM5
PowerBridgeM5 says 20km of distance but I guess that&#
ld be for long range
> production.
>
> Bob-
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Mike Hammett
> Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 4:36 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re
OK I just got off the phone with a salesman that was discouraging me away from
UBNT rockets for this link. I will be running 4 towers through this link with
270 clients. His concern was that they had learned of a 20,000 packet per sec
limit compared to Ligowave @ 75,000 packets. Now I am looki
I would steer well clear of that UBNT bridge for something as critical
as you describe. At the price point it just screams disaster.
I've not used the Ligowave MIMO radios however I have used the LigoPTP 5-N
and I was a little disappointed. The lack of QoS is a definite negative.
We had one of
270 customers will squash Ubiquiti if you put that kind of weight on its
shoulders. I strongly advise against a "higher end" backhaul. I love
MikroTik but at 270 customers, that is kind of iffy in my opinion. I'd
probably do it based on the fact that they always work for me and their
price point
-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 7:24 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT PowerBridgeM5
270 customers will squash Ubiquiti if you put that kind of weight on its
shoulders. I strongly advise against a "higher end" backhaul. I love
Actually it is a Ubiquti radio and the power supply does not need to
be 48 volts, 9-48 works fine for the Gateworks board (Avila GW2348-2).
We had moisture get in the ethernet jack and burn the pins when it
was using 48 volts, so we switched to a Ubiquti 15 volt adapter and
have not had any proble
Phil,
The units we had would not boot unless they were powered using 48V.
This also caused us some dramas since our sites had 12V supplies
predominantly. The spec sheet of the radio lists a wide input
voltage but acording to support our hardware required the 48.
The radios were definitely brand
, April 07, 2010 12:31 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT PowerBridgeM5
Phil,
The units we had would not boot unless they were powered using 48V.
This also caused us some dramas since our sites had 12V supplies
predominantly. The spec sheet of the radio lists a wide input
voltage but
r
> WAVELINC
> P.O. Box 126
> Bucyrus, OH 44820
> 419-562-6405
> www.wavelinc.com
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Patrick Cole
> Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 12:31
, April 08, 2010 9:05 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT PowerBridgeM5
Kurt,
Are they reliable? They seem to be much lower cost compared to
what we've used previously (Snaptec).
Pat
Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 08:54:03AM -0400, Kurt Fankhauser wrote:
> This should fix your
Are the Access point and the Station set to WDS. Ubnt recommends this
for the units to be a full transparent bridge.
We had a similar issue and this fixed it for us.
-Cameron
Thanks,
Cameron Kilton
Project Manager
Midcoast Internet Solutions
http://www.midcoast.com
c...@midcoast.com
(207) 594-
If a UBNT radio is used solely as an AP (not bridged to another unit) would
turning WDS on or off have any effect on the handling of data?
Greg
On Apr 12, 2010, at 11:44 AM, Cameron Kilton wrote:
> Are the Access point and the Station set to WDS. Ubnt recommends this
> for the units to be a fu
Depends if the station/CPE was using WDS.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
“Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue
that counts.”
--- Winston Churchill
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Greg Ihnen wr
If the only clients are laptops (no WDS) to a Bullet or NS2 would WDS being on
offer anything?
Thanks!
Greg
On Apr 12, 2010, at 1:53 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
> Depends if the station/CPE was using WDS.
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
>
Usually adds trouble in that case. I have had good luck NATing at the
bullet/NS2 devices.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
“Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue
that counts.”
--- Winston Churchill
Sicne the AP's are WRAPs and dont do WDS (that I know of) I ended up
swapping out the WRAP with a BM2. Works great now!
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Cameron Kilton wrote:
> Are the Access point and the Station set to WDS. Ubnt recommends this
> for the units to be a full transparent bridge.
It wasnt.
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Josh Luthman
wrote:
> Depends if the station/CPE was using WDS.
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue
>
Just got the announcement for the release of the UBNT 900 products. Anyone
do any pre-release testing with these yet? How is the performance?
Robert West
Just Micro Digital Services Inc.
740-335-7020
Logo5
<>
---
: Sunday, August 08, 2010 11:39 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: [WISPA] UBNT thoughts
Hi Faisal and the list
We have also been using UBNT quite a bit lately over the last couple of
years. Im anxious to try some of the 900 and 3.65 when the time is right.
Nano 2 and Nano 5 ha
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wi
LOT of money. It was better to just make a way
for moisture to drain.
Ralph
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Kurt Fankhauser
Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2010 7:09 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT thoughts
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
419-562-6405
*From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
*On Behalf Of *Ralph
*Sent:* Sunday, August 08, 2010 11:39 AM
*To:* 'WISPA General List'
*Subject:* [WISPA] UBNT thoughts
Hi Faisal and the list
We hav
-562-6405
_
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Faisal Imtiaz
Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2010 10:49 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UBNT thoughts
Well.
I don't know how things are in Ohio... but in our neck of the
1 - 100 of 600 matches
Mail list logo
