Zack,
WISPA is a trade organization...if you care what it says, then join. It is
not a business (I'll shop there if you offer better customer service), it is
not a gym member (I'll join if you get this piece of equipment), it is a
trade organization. It is member run, as all trade organizations
List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 12:55 AM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] In support of legal operation
See inline comments please
Behalf Of Zack Kneisley
John, List.. anyone else really.
I was trying not to get into a discussion at a 12 year old level. I
merely
support anyone
vote or a Member
vote.
Respectfully,
Rick Harnish
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Zack Kneisley
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 10:33 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] In support of legal operation
John, List.. anyone else
]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 7:48 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] In support of legal operation
Part-15 used to do the same things WISPA does. However, I think most of
the people with Part-15 that did this left to form WISPA.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent
).
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: JohnnyO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 7:55 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] In support of legal operation
Part-15 did NOT do the same
All of you are worse than a bunch of 12 year old school girls--on both
sides. Give it a rest already.
Pretty much, the arguments for being certified speak for themselves. Some
people make what they feel are educated business decisions to do otherwise.
Fine for them. It's not the end of the
Amen, brother.
Clint Ricker wrote:
All of you are worse than a bunch of 12 year old school girls--on both
sides. Give it a rest already.
Pretty much, the arguments for being certified speak for themselves. Some
people make what they feel are educated business decisions to do otherwise.
Fine
We've already done that Ralph.
Have you read this yet?
http://www.wispa.org/?page_id=3
laters,
marlon
- Original Message -
From: Ralph [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2007 5:59 AM
Subject: [WISPA] In support of legal
02, 2007 10:31 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] In support of legal operation
John
I don't see where Ralph said that WISPA supports breaking the law, I'm not
sure where that could have been derived from.
I feel that Ralphs statement was one of frustration of WISPA not publicly
supporting a specific
- Original Message -
From: George Rogato [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2007 2:14 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] In support of legal operation
Ralph
You see the industry through a very narrow set of blinders. There is a
whole lot
ache. There's
NEVER a compromise or a solution cause all he wants is something to argue
about.
marlon
- Original Message -
From: Scott Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2007 4:15 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] In support of legal
John, List.. anyone else really.
I was trying not to get into a discussion at a 12 year old level. I merely
support anyone who feels that they want to change something, through a
structured method. Although I agree on this particular issue, making a
statement look at our code of ethics does not
See inline comments please
Behalf Of Zack Kneisley
John, List.. anyone else really.
I was trying not to get into a discussion at a 12 year old level. I
merely
support anyone who feels that they want to change something, through a
structured method. Although I agree on this particular
I see in the WISPA Code of Ethics this line:
e) Use proper diligence to ensure that all materials on their networks
are restricted in accordance with applicable laws, regulations and the
tenets of reasonable precaution.
If this needs to be worded differently then maybe this would suffice? I
Why should WISPA take any stance on what a wisp uses to conduct business?
What business is it of others what anyone else does?
If the FCC thought what was going on was a terrible thing, they would
have said so.
WISPA's efforts towards compliance may be slow, but there is now
certified
] In support of legal operation
Why should WISPA take any stance on what a wisp uses to conduct business?
What business is it of others what anyone else does?
If the FCC thought what was going on was a terrible thing, they would
have said so.
WISPA's efforts towards compliance may be slow
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of George Rogato
Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2007 3:18 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] In support of legal operation
Why should WISPA take any stance on what a wisp uses to conduct business?
What business
: Sunday, September 02, 2007 3:18 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] In support of legal operation
Why should WISPA take any stance on what a wisp uses to conduct business?
What business is it of others what anyone else does?
If the FCC thought what was going on was a terrible thing
George Rogato wrote:
One thing you have been successful at is ending most discussions of
what people are using, their accomplishments or plain old advice on
this list. I bet a lot of guys are scared with your FCC insinuations
not to bother posting anything to this list.
I don't think you can
Matt
Seeing you and Ralph are business constituants and shoulder to shoulder,
I wouldn't expect you to stray from the party line
Matt Liotta wrote:
George Rogato wrote:
One thing you have been successful at is ending most discussions of
what people are using, their accomplishments or
I gather that this is a response of the ad hominem variety Matt just
predicted, but could you clarify your meaning? Aren't we all businesses (and
constituents, business and otherwise)?
On 9/2/07, George Rogato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt
Seeing you and Ralph are business constituants and
I am not sure that a position paper is required, but I will offer a few
opinions based on some of what I have seen this post generate in responses.
Though I am not currently 100% compliant with the FCC rules nor a
member, I wish I were both. Even after 1 full year of research into
what I
Please expand upon this statement...
Because you agree that WISPA supports only certified systems through a
ethics statement, does not conclude that WISPA as a professional
organization supports the use of only certified systems.
I do not see how this statement makes any sense. The
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of George Rogato
Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2007 3:18 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] In support of legal operation
Why should WISPA take any stance on what a wisp uses to conduct
business?
What business
On Sun, 2 Sep 2007, Scott Reed wrote:
So I am 100% behind Ralph wanting to be assured that WISPA is all
about being legal.
WISPA put this in the Code of Ethics. The organization is certainly
all about being legal.
I also agree with Ralph's opening comment about getting more
latitude in
It doesn't really help, when attempting to clarify a misunderstood or
confusing
statement, to say the same thing over again.
You asserted, in your posting, that the position of WISPA as stated in the
code of ethics, did not meet the requirement in your opinion of being the
official stance of
Ralph
As only a list member, wireless operator and entrepreneur, I support and
encorage your request. WISPA, should publicly support issues, especially
those that are law. This specific position should not be something that
requires debate.
I hope this request will open a dialog of democratic,
27 matches
Mail list logo
