of course that we agree on 7.5sec for Es openings but we MUST agree
beforehand. I have tended to use Q65 for IONO or weak tropo on 2m. It works
very well for this with 30s periods. Of course if we do not adopt a fixed
frequency per band like FT8 then it does not matter.
Regards
Conrad PA5Y
From
Yes, that is perfectly clear and needs no further 'discussion'.
73
Conrad PA5Y
-Original Message-
From: Joe Taylor via wsjt-devel
Sent: Monday, May 8, 2023 8:34 PM
To: WSJT software development
Cc: Joe Taylor
Subject: [wsjt-devel] Enough
Please, folks, no more email about "
I have to say that this is possibly to most tedious and pointless thread I have
ever seen. As for Jim Brown not having the technical ability, I am lost for
words.
Adrian, please calm down, you are becoming very unpopular.
73 Conrad PA5Y
-Original Message-
From: Adrian via wsjt-devel
Hello Michael I am sorry to hear this and wish you all the best.
73 Conrad PA5Y
-Original Message-
From: Black Michael via wsjt-devel
Sent: 10 March 2023 05:23
To: Joe Taylor via wsjt-devel
Cc: Black Michael
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Future of Hamlib #hamlib
Thanks Joe -- I've been
for WSJT-X as I
run 4 instances of WSJT-X on 2m, 0, 45, 90 and 135 deg. I will copy this reply
to the development team.
Regards
Conrad PA5Y
From: Moon-net On Behalf Of DAVID ACCARDI
via Moon-net
Sent: 19 June 2022 13:28
To: moon-...@mailman.pe1itr.com
Subject: [Moon-Net] When Using Map65
not seem to be
any problem at all, only when I am monitoring on RX. Incidentally the problem
occurs (unsurprisingly) with JTDX as well, which I use on 6m exclusively.
Anybody got any ideas what else I can do? Is there some debug function that I
can use to help with diagnostics?
Regards
Conrad
This is a none invasive solution and practical, there are times when I require
a continuous carrier. So my vote would be to adopt Mike’s suggestion.
Conrad PA5Y
From: Black Michael via wsjt-devel
Sent: 06 March 2022 14:05
To: 'WSJT software development'
Cc: Black Michael
Subject: Re: [wsjt
No problems with download or install on my 64bit Win 10 Pro for Workstations.
This has been the case for all recent releases.
Regards
Conrad PA5Y
From: Dave Slotter, W3DJS via wsjt-devel
Sent: 04 November 2021 19:25
To: WSJT software development
Cc: Dave Slotter, W3DJS
Subject: Re: [wsjt
the DF axis a lot more intuitive. I CAN do
without but would like to have the choice. It is not a criticism but a user
request.
Regards
Conrad PA5Y
-Original Message-
From: Don Hawbaker
Sent: 03 November 2021 12:46
To: WSJT software development
Cc: Conrad PA5Y
Subject: Re: [wsjt
later this week.
Regards
Conrad PA5Y
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
that would mess up WSJT-X fed from my K3S as well as MAP65
where latency is very low'.
I will look at the Linrad settings but the Dsec facility worked perfectly for
years. I am perhaps being lazy but spare time is scarce. I am sure that there
are valid reasons for removing Dsec.
Regards
Conrad PA5Y
DXCC and not quite right. I
am sure that this will be remedied soon.
73
Conrad PA5Y
-Original Message-
From: Joe Taylor via wsjt-devel
Sent: 19 October 2021 19:56
To: Conrad PA5Y via wsjt-devel
Cc: Joe Taylor
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Compound call behaviour Q65
Hi Conrad,
What
. It is only for
outputs fed from the Linrad demodulator. I use large buffers and delay times to
improve the blanker. I can look at improving the latency, but Dsec was perfect
for the job.
73
Conrad PA5Y
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel
the decoder fully yet.
Regards
Conrad PA5Y
From: Charles Suckling via wsjt-devel
Sent: 18 October 2021 18:14
To: WSJT software development
Cc: Charles Suckling
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Compound call behaviour Q65
Hi Conrad
I'm not sure there is any need to change the program with urgency. If you
.
Eventually I RX
PA5Y FO/W7GJ R-28
I TX W7GJ PA5Y RRR which is incorrect. Of course, it should be FO/W7GJ PA5Y RRR
It is only now that I am worried that FO/W7GJ will lose sensitivity. If that is
not the case, then it is not urgent at all.
Regards
Conrad PA5Y
From: Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
Thanks Bill, you can imagine for marginal QSOs such as this when Lance is
expecting RRR it could be an issue, he is there right now. Any chance that this
can be fixed as a matter of some urgency please
73
Conrad PA5Y
From: Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
Sent: 18 October 2021 15:02
To: wsjt
t; RRR
Obviously tropo but in this TX4 example the compound call appears to have been
transmitted, whereas in my case above it is not.
Regards
Conrad PA5Y
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinf
Europeans will not be keen either, we use signal reports and not grids in
contests and in fact generally. I will howl a lot! The VHF features is
important for EME.
73
Conrad PA5Y
From: George J Molnar via wsjt-devel
Sent: 01 August 2021 17:44
To: WSJT software development
Cc: George J
the sequencer on GND on TX so I use the SS input. I had
misunderstood the modulation source settings, now all is working as expected.
73
Conrad PA5Y
-Original Message-
From: jarmo via wsjt-devel
Sent: 20 July 2021 07:34
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: jarmo
Subject: Re: [wsjt
. Besides my station
controller works this way. This makes sure that all active bands are
controlled, including the radios.
Regards
Conrad PA5Y
From: Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
Sent: 20 July 2021 00:09
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Bill Somerville
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] very
Conrad PA5Y
From: Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
Sent: 19 July 2021 23:13
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Bill Somerville
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] very infuriating problem with Hamlib for TS-890S
On 19/07/2021 19:19, Conrad PA5Y via wsjt-devel wrote:
Probably best if I add a few
that simple.
I’ll go away now…….
73
Conrad PA5Y
From: Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel
Sent: 19 July 2021 23:42
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Bill Somerville
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] very infuriating problem with Hamlib for TS-890S
On 19/07/2021 22:12, Bill Somerville via wsjt-devel wrote
assume that this is a Hamlib problem?
Regards
Conrad PA5Y
[cid:image001.png@01D77CDA.C76AF7F0][cid:image002.png@01D77CDB.57984D00]
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
This seems to be fixed now. I had to set the CODEC to single channel 48kHz and
select LEFT in the wsjt audio settings, it has been running for over 24hrs
without problems.
73
Conrad PA5Y
From: Conrad PA5Y via wsjt-devel
Sent: 17 July 2021 13:59
To: WSJT software development
Cc: Conrad PA5Y
This is a showstopper; the USB hubs are set so that power saving is not active.
Does anybody have any ideas?
Regards
Conrad PA5Y
From: Conrad PA5Y via wsjt-devel
Sent: 17 July 2021 07:52
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Conrad PA5Y
Subject: [wsjt-devel] wsjt-x v2.5.0-rc3
Good
that there is no hardware problem.
Are there some diagnostics I can run or file that I can provide to help with
debugging? I will start on 6m EME very soon and I will need Q65.
Any help would be appreciated.
Regards
Conrad PA5Y
___
wsjt-devel mailing
previous message.
The Subject line should read GFSK, not GMSK.
FT4 and FT8 use Gaussian Frequency Shift Keying (GFSK), *not* Gaussian
Minimum Shift Keying (GMSK). The latter is yet another possible
modulation scheme.
-- Joe, K1JT
On 7/17/2019 10:27 AM, Conrad PA5Y wrote:
> Thanks both B
Thanks both Bill and Joe, that is certainly a very worthwhile improvement,
thanks to the team for the effort! I will read everything with interest.
Regards
Conrad PA5Y
From: Joe Taylor
Sent: 17 July 2019 15:33
To: WSJT software development
Subject: Re
Hello Joe I am quite interested to learn more about the GMSK waveform
generation, where can I read more about it and the implementation in WSJT-X and
the advantages.
I will try to install the new release this evening.
Many thanks
Conrad PA5Y
Conrad PA5Y
From: Reino Talarmo
Sent: 14 July 2019 06:32
To: 'WSJT software development'
Subject: [wsjt-devel] signal report RST
Hi All,
There has been many situation, where FT8 signal quality is less than perfect
due to hum, actually hum related harmonics. In one example hum related
sidebands were
It does, Joe.
Thanks for the first convincing explanation that I have seen.
Regards
Conrad PA5Y
-Original Message-
From: Joe Taylor
Sent: 10 July 2019 01:41
To: WSJT software development
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 ghost signals
Hi Conrad,
On 7/8/2019 18:29, Conrad PA5Y wrote
in contests on
432 and 1296. I admit that I am puzzled by this and have no other plausible
explanation.
73
Conrad PA5Y
-Original Message-
From: Jim Brown
Sent: 09 July 2019 11:46
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 ghost signals
On 7/8/2019 3:29 PM
during
intense Es events sure enough I also see these ghosts on 6m and again no shift.
It really is very puzzling indeed.
73
Conrad PA5Y, JO21VO
-Original Message-
From: Martin Davies G0HDB
Sent: 07 July 2019 11:27
To: WSJT software development
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 ghost
to be offended if you like, I will never believe it.
Thankfully we are all still human.
73
Conrad PA5Y
PS nor cross posted
From: Tom Melvin
Sent: 27 February 2019 14:42
To: wsjtgroup
Cc: WSJT software development
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] [wsjtgroup] 70 Mhz
advise?
Regards
Conrad PA5Y
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
starts in May and
wonder what is going on.
73
Conrad PA5Y
From: Marco Calistri via wsjt-devel
Sent: 13 November 2018 17:00
To: WSJT software development
Cc: Marco Calistri
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] New release RC-4 not decoding anything.
Sorry to breaking
Thanks Joe, this will be most helpful during the weekly (sometime
bi-weekly) UK, Nordic and Dutch VHF activity contests and is most
welcome. I will hopefully have some antennas up by then!
73
Conrad PA5Y
On 2018-07-24 21:32, Joe Taylor wrote:
2. EU VHF Contest operation with the exchange
Seems to me that the original post was that of an internet troll.
Probably best to move on.
73
Conrad PA5Y
On 2018-06-14 09:55, Jim Brown wrote:
I must say that I'm getting awfully tired of the bashing of a fine
operating mode that requires a lot more operator sophistication than
those who
a better
expression than PA0XX WIDE, it seems too confrontational.
I do hope that when conditions on 6m get even better that alternative
frequencies are used.
73
Conrad PA5Y
On 2018-05-15 11:43, Mark Turner via wsjt-devel wrote:
Having just watched another station sending a "CHK TIMING&quo
them.
Many thanks in advance.
Conrad PA5Y
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
with the wide graph even when I set it for fast updates.
Seems that I have an unlucky combination of hardware.
Regards
Conrad PA5Y
On 03/04/2018 15:46, Joe Taylor wrote:
Hi Conrad,
Strange problem.
I have heard examples of "zipper noise" correlated with rapid changes
of what's
. It is one of the things that makes me hang on to WSJT10 for EME.
Regards
Conrad PA5Y
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
suggestions about what I can do?
Regards
Conrad PA5Y
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
43 matches
Mail list logo
