Which port are these clients using? Can they be set up (correctly) to
use SSL (port 465) or MSA (port 587)? It would seem to me that using SSL
would solve the problem nicely (unless the ISP is blocking that port),
as the ISP would then be unable to filter the content since it would be
encrypted
I have not noticed this specifically with xmail, but I have noticed this
with other applications. I wrote a very simple test application once
(that did nothing but spawn threads which sat idle for 5 minutes, then
exited). The count was right around 1800 when the application became
unable to spa
Davide Libenzi wrote:
>
> "alias" can be a wildcard *name*. It cannot contain a domain, for which
> you have the "domain" field. The "realaccount" filed can be a full email
> address, not "alias".
>
Thank you... That's what I needed to know.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsu
Rob Arends wrote:
> Hi Tracy,
>
> I've done [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> But not specifically tested your [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I would have to lab it; so I think you are left in the same boat.
>
> Sorry.
Thanks Rob. I'll probably try to set it up and test it sometim
Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Sep 2007, Tracy wrote:
>
>> I am looking at making a few wildcard aliases, and I don't seem to be
>> able to find anything in the documentation that says whether or not this
>> will work as expected. So:
>>
>> 1) Do al
I am looking at making a few wildcard aliases, and I don't seem to be
able to find anything in the documentation that says whether or not this
will work as expected. So:
1) Do aliases use the same StrIWildMatch function that is used in the
SMTPUtils.cpp class?
2) Are alias names allowed to co
As I understand it, the POP3 specification indicates that the mailbox
will be locked for the duration of any login session. I'm not sure that
changing that would be a good idea - introduces non-standard behavior.
If you need multiple login access to a mailbox, you really need to move
to IMAP (w
Kirk Friggstad wrote:
> Has anyone done any work with authenticating XMail against a Windows Active
> Directory system? Just curious if it can be done, if anyone has code to
> share, etc. before I go possibly re-inventing the wheel. Thanks!
I wrote some code a while back to do that - but I haven't
Davide Libenzi wrote:
>
> A record is logged inside the SMAIL log, *only if* the remote MTA returned
> a 2xx response at the end of the DATA transaction. At that point, it is
> the remote MTA responsibility to ensure the message is delivered through
> the next steps.
>
Thanks, Davide. I thou
riginal Message -
> From: "Tracy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 1:51 PM
> Subject: [xmail] Re: Vanishing mails?
>
>
>> Local mail server configuration is reasonably correct. The HELO domain
>> setting is a valid FQDN a
ontain something that looks
> like your IP address, and points back to the IP of the mailserver.
>
> Ivo
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Tracy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 1:13 PM
> Subject: [xmail] Vanishing mails?
I have a user who is telling me that they attempted to send email to
various places and the emails are simply vanishing. One of the places is
to the place they work, and another was to Yahoo.
I've looked in my logs, and I see the mail coming into my server
(verified by the SMTP logs showing the
Davide Libenzi wrote:
>>> It SHOULD check at the nameservers for yahoo.com, if they return the
>>> requested record (MX), the resolver has its answer (which is the case!), if
>>> it does not return the requested record type, it should retry at the
>>> returned NS records.
>> It does. It tries to
Rob Arends wrote:
> your spamtrap emails will be seen as individual addresses until the smtp
> session is closed, then xmail puts them all in one mbox.
> Glst will see them all - this will affect your db size - unless you are
> bypassing glst on your spamtrap emails.
Actually, no. Looking at the d
py glst-lame.txt + glst-lame.tmp glst-lame.txt
> Rem ** All done, restart xmail
> net start xmail
> **
>
>
>> -Message d'origine-
>> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Tracy
>> Envoy=E9 : jeudi 15 mars
Francesco Vertova wrote:
> At 13.10 15/03/07, you wrote:
>
>> I'm currently using GLST with Xmail 1.24, and I've noticed that the
>> glst.dbm file never seems to shrink. The glst-lame.dbm grows each time I
>> do glst --cleanup, but the glst.dbm file only gets larger.
>
> I think glst.dbm is suppo
mplemented glst on 10 Jan, and my glst.conf settings
are below.
Suggestions are appreciated.
Tracy
glst.conf
rejmsg=451 4.7.1 Please try again later
generr=0
rejerr=19
timeo=300
exptimeo=3110400
lametimeo=28800
mnet=206.190.32.0,255.255.224.0,255.255.224.0
mnet=64.233.160.0,255.255.224.0,255
Filip Supera wrote:
> Davide Libenzi a écrit :
>
>> Hmmm, that shouldn't happen. Did anyone else have problems with "wlex"?
>
> Does anyone else use "wlex" with success ?
I never tried it. I have a slightly more complicated set of conditions
necessary for whitelisting, which includes checking
Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Jan 2007, Tracy wrote:
>
>> Davide Libenzi wrote:
>>> On Sat, 20 Jan 2007, Brian Z wrote:
>>>
>>> If you want free one, look at clam-av. Note that the value of an AV
>>> solution is not on the engine/libraries,
Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Jan 2007, Brian Z wrote:
>
>> Does anyone have any good low cost antivirus setups for XMail running on
>> linux?
>>
>> Since the viruses that affect windows and linux are quite different, are
>> the linux antivirus libraries as affective against finding window
I'd call it nice to have, rather than necessary. If it rides another
version, I won't cry. Much...:)
Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Nov 2006, Norbert Doeberlein wrote:
>
>> Yes, I think that is very valuable!
>>
>> And please give Harald enough info so he can update XQM. ;-)
>
> Hmmm, ... t
I'd love to have that - it would have helped me a lot the other day when
I was having queue problems. Something similar to froz* commands, but
for queue instead
Davide Libenzi wrote:
>
> How badly would be needed the ability to list "in flight" messages, with
> the ability to "schedule no
Davide Libenzi wrote:
> Hahaha, the never ending story of 1.23 :) Will follow soon ...
Just think, soon you can have 1.23 pre45 :)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of
Pedro Jaramillo wrote:
> Greetings to all members of the xMail-Server family,
>
> Could anyone help me figure out what the following codes mean?
>
> AUTH=EFAIL:TYPE=LOGIN
User was attempting to authenticate to send mail, using the LOGIN
protocol. Authentication failed (possibly bad credential
Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Nov 2006, Tracy wrote:
>
>> Note: Windows 2000 platform:
>>
>> I'm currently running a slightly stale version of xmail (I'm still
>> running it because I made some custom mods to a few things and I haven't
&g
Note: Windows 2000 platform:
I'm currently running a slightly stale version of xmail (I'm still
running it because I made some custom mods to a few things and I haven't
had time to pull the source and update a new version with the mods).
It's running fine (now that I cleaned some bad messages
Rob Arends wrote:
>>> set something like that up in BIND without having to list each host or
> subdomain...
>
> Re: the above from Tracy, not sure about what you mean. If you mean
> mailserver1.spammer.com and mailserver2.spammer.com, needing to be listed.
> No, only t
Rob Arends wrote:
> Then in xmail's server.tab - CustMapsList, list your RBL first. (obviously
> you'd need your resolv.conf to point to your named otherwise you'd need to
> delegate and make public your RBL.) I have a local named running as a cache
> anyway, so hosting a zone is an easy step af
method), and
simply indicate to XMail by the filter return code whether to terminate
mail processing for the message, or simply dump this recipient.
But I suppose it will be up to Davide how he wants to handle this...
Tracy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oh! Oh! Me! Me!
:)
Davide Libenzi wrote:
>
> How many would appreciate per-RCPT SMTP filter capabilities?
>
>
>
> - Davide
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For general help: send the line "help" in
Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, Tracy wrote:
>
>>> Well, it was definitely a corrupt message of some kind in the outbound
>>> queue. Once I got about 200 of the waiting messages out of the queue,
>>> local mail delivery started flowing again.
>
Resending because I didn't get an echo - not sure if it made it to the
list...
Tracy wrote:
> Soenke Ruempler wrote:
>> Hi Tracy,
>>
>> On 27.10.2006 14:00, Tracy wrote:
>>
>>> I'm running XMail 1.20 (I know, not the current version) on Windows
he pre and post data filters are not hanging up
anywhere - there aren't any copies of them still hanging around in the
process list. And I've tried restarting the machine (same effect as
restarting XMail - queued mail gets delivered, new arriving mail sticks
in the queue).
Tracy
-
You can get at them with the "frozlist" and "frozgetlog" ctrl commands...
Rob Arends wrote:
> Thanks Soenke.
>
> I'm just confirming my understanding then:
> The /slog/ logs are removed once successful transmission is completed - and
> then logged to smail.
> Upon failure they are removed also,
s, not for outbound. But I
do know stunnel can support outbound (client-type) connections - and I
*think* there was an example on their site on how to set it up (but it's
been over a year since I was there, so)
Tracy
Paul Allen wrote:
> Ok, dude, that was less than helpful, so
FYI - Spamcop's BL is very heavy with false positives. Not to say it
can't be useful as part of a scoring system, but if you use it directly
to reject mail, you're *going* to lose legitimate mail...
Jorn Hass wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> For those that are interested, I did some quick reports for the
The source code for the NTAuth app should be included in the ZIP file.
You are welcome to modify it to run on Linux using Samba if you like.
I don't know anything about Samba programming, and I don't have a Linux
dev station to work from, so I can't do the port for you.
Cesar L. Meloni wrote:
Personally, I'd like to see the ability to call external filters at each
stage of the process (connect, HELO/EHLO, MAIL FROM, RCPT TO (once for
each recipient), DATA, and post-DATA). Ideally, these would be triggered
once the command is accepted and parsed, but before the SMTP result code
is r
Rob Arends wrote:
> Yes I agree, if there is a lookup failure it should fail immediately.
> Also if the DNS lookup is ok, and Xmail cannot connect to the IP address, it
> should fail immediately.
>
> Now I hear you say, no!!!
>
> This is the correct function. This is why the RFCs call for a sec
t.and if I make a mistake I get an error message
>
> The box is a NSLU2 from linksys which is going to replace my server
> (mbuijtendijk.nl).
>
> Gr. Martin
> _
>
> From: Tracy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: xmail@xmailserver.org
> Sent: Th
Hmm... Is this machine accessible from the net? I tried telnetting to
mbuijtendijk.nl and the banner that came up was for a Kerio mail server...
The telnet window closing - the only reason I know of for that to happen
is an invalid character in the input (something non-ASCII). Otherwise,
you w
Here's an exact copy of a POP3 telnet session with my mail server - the
only change is to replace my password with "". Note that lines
sent by the server begin with + (the banner line will wrap in the
email). The lines I typed are the "user", "pass", "stat", and "quit" lines.
+OK <[EMA
It was unclear from your message whether you are entering the POP3
commands or just the user name. The syntax for a POP3 session through
telnet goes:
USER [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PASS password
STAT
QUIT
STAT will list how many messages are in the mailbox.
Also, I find that using the Enter key on th
Another possible solution is the option to allow - perhaps by server.tab
variables - the postponing of any specific checks for rejection to the
pre-data phase, and have a "policy" variable which simply holds a
particular value for each recipient. As recipients are received by the
mail server,
Dale Qualls wrote:
>
> Tracy:
>
> You might want to upgrade to 1.22, IIRC there was some kind of obscure
> security bug fix in 1.22 that was supposedly exploitable in 1.21.
>
As I recall, the security fix was in regard to sendmail, not the xmail
server directly. Since I don
Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Dec 2005, Adrian Hicks wrote:
>
>
>>If you're running GNU/Linux on your mail server you can use iptables to
>>create a firewall to protect XMail. Works a dream here.
>
>
> The problem he's having is that he wants an AUTH session to overrule the
> IP blocking
I believe Davide is gone on vacation Or maybe he hasn't left yet?
Rob Arends wrote:
> Davide, can you take this guy out of the list.
>
> Rob :-)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Randy Adams
> Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 10:11
Spyros Tsiolis wrote:
> Hello again people,
>
> OK, another question I have is that since version 1.19 (I think) of xmail,
> if you try to actually
> telnet to port 25 from any other address other than localhost, it behaves as
> the smtp service
> is not running (refuses connection).
>
> I rea
At 10:53 6/22/2005, Yann LE ROCH - Agence CHROM wrote:
>Hello=20
>I use http://software.dolist.net/xscanner.asp on my xmail 1.18 (windows =
>2000
>server)
>I just want to know if it's possible to send an e.mail notification to
>recipient when a e.mail is blocked by xscanner.
>Spamassassin is too
Just a test
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Did you follow the link provided? It should give you some idea of why your
mail was rejected.
Assuming that the IP address in the rejection message is the same as the
one from which your mail was sent, it would appear that the IP address is
listed in the DUL blocklist (DUL = Dial Up Listings).
At 19:15 4/7/2005, Brett wrote:
> > Just add -SI parameters for each address/port pair (to the MAIL_CMD_LINE
> > registry entry) you want to have SMTP bound on
>
>Well - Hotdamn - I think I will mess with that this weekend.
>
>Oh - I got a VBS script to give me all the email addresses from the
At 13:13 4/7/2005, Brett wrote:
>I have thought about forcing Exchange to use port 24 which should pretty
>well stop it doing anything but have not researched setting up XMail to
>run on both ports 25 and 24 - I am not even sure it can.
Sure it can. You can run Xmail on any ports you want. I curre
At 01:12 4/7/2005, Alexander Hagenah wrote:
> >> Once it's all set up, though, the Exchange server will receive
> >> incoming mail from Xmail (with all validation and spam / virus scans
> >> done prior to receipt), and all outbound mail from the Exchange
> >> server will go through Xmail as a smart
At 15:59 4/6/2005, Brett wrote:
> > Once it's all set up, though, the Exchange server will receive incoming
> > mail from Xmail (with all validation and spam / virus scans done prior
> > to receipt), and all outbound mail from the Exchange server will go
> > through Xmail as a smarthost.
>
>I can't
At 13:58 4/6/2005, Brett wrote:
>Since this all feeds into an Exchange 2000 server (which is 'stunningly
>stupid' and was made even 'more stupid' when we tried to use GFI on it
>never mind the huge COST of the GFI software that - as it looks now - is
>in a bad ROI ratio compared to XMail 8-) about
At 06:03 4/6/2005, Brett wrote:
>Mail for MYCOMPANY.COM is handled by XMail at MYDOMAIN.COM
>All mail (that gets thru the filters) for MYCOMPANY.COM is
>handed to an (GACK!) Exchange 2000 server.
>
>I do this thru a Custom Domain.
>
>First anything getting through the Spam Lists, DNS, etc. and rece
I wrote a web-based mail access program (very simplistic) a year or so ago.
Writing a TCP/IP module to handle the POP3 access to the mail isn't that
hard - might be worth doing to give yourself some flexibility.
At 19:20 3/31/2005, Dustin C. Hatch wrote:
>As I said, PHP does the downloading, so
As Davide said, those numbers are only valid for the specific POP3 session
that you received them in. Future sessions are not guaranteed to have the
same numbers for the same messages.
You should use the UIDL numbers. Retrieve them as:
+OK Maildrop has 4 messages (12788 bytes)
UIDL
+OK 4
1 1028
Which number are you using for the message ID number? How are you getting
this number?
At 07:04 3/30/2005, Dustin C. Hatch wrote:
>I recently developed a webmail client for POP3/POP3S so that I could use
>native XMail support and webmail. The way the inbox is designed, messages
>are released i
At 12:20 3/20/2005, decker wrote:
>So, I guess the question is, is it normal that filters.in.tab does not
>allow the rcpt to be changed while the filters.post-data.tab does ? Am I
>perhaps doing something incorrectly ?
Logically, that is what I would expect to happen. filters.in.tab is run
afte
ng in RFC2671 that requires them to change)
At 09:46 3/13/2005, Dario wrote:
>That should be in RFC 2671...
>
>Dario
>
>-Messaggio originale-
>Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Per
>conto di Tracy
>Inviato: domenica 13 marzo 2005 14.43
>A: xmail@x
At 00:09 3/13/2005, Kroll, David wrote:
>This is a Win2003 DNS issue.
>Some mailservers behind firewalls which do not allow transfer of UDP packets
>larger than 512 bytes may not be able to return the MX record
>
>If your firewall restricts UDP packet transfers though, you may want to
>verify that
At 09:09 3/9/2005, Jeffrey Laramie wrote:
>Hey All,
>
>Every so often I get a batch of these messages sent to my backup mx. Someth=
>ing=20
>seems to be wrong with the way the backup mx is handling the address since =
>I=20
>rather doubt they are really sending mail to 3f4c0519.8000109. I'm concern
At 05:40 2/27/2005, Liron Newman wrote:
> >Every time I create an "alias" for a web site or such, I add it as an alias
> >to a specific user account. Then I set up an "unknown" user account which
> >gets the * alias.
> >
> >
>I considered the option, but I didn't want to be bothered with creating
>
At 09:55 2/26/2005, Liron Newman wrote:
>Phillip R. Shaw wrote:
>
> >I make up lots of email addresses, this is a personal domain, every
> >website I go to I make up a new email address for them. Means I can't
> >block non-existing addresses.
> >
>Just a quick comment about this - I use the same me
At 20:33 2/14/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > But because that is possible with SMTP filters, it should have very low
> > priority (imho).
>
> Here you've lost me :(, how is possible with SMTP filters to bypass RBLS
>and spammers.tab, can I have a small example please ???
Turn off the checks i
hout regard to whether it comes from=20
blacklisted or blocked space.
The mods to do this aren't terribly hard, but I'm not comfortable enough=20
with the quality of my code to be able to share it with anyone. If someone=
=20
wants to discuss it in the abstract (for instance, in preparation
At 16:19 1/22/2005, S=F6nke Ruempler wrote:
> > Or, perhaps, is there a way to "force" xmail to process the message
> > into the format expected in the mailbox directory before the
> > execution of external commands from mailproc.tab *without* actually
> > delivering the message to the mailbox?
>
>
At 15:28 1/22/2005, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> > processed by the SMTP engine. My understanding was that by the time a
> > message got to the mailproc.tab filter for a specific user account, that
> > the items used for SMTP processing (such as the lines containing the local
> > message id, the MAIL FR
uot;1106419542602.2656.42d9.karen" "S178236"
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "EXTRN"
"Quarantine.exe""2005-01-22 13:45:06"
Any insight?
Tracy
69.58.30.138:59110;66.219.1
At 09:01 1/10/2005, S=F6nke Ruempler wrote:
> > What do you think? What could be the implications of the
> > current status,
> > and of changing it? Does it even matter (SPAM scores maybe? I don't
> > know..)?=3D20
>
>Yes, the HELO and the RDNS of your outgoing IP should be the same to =3D
>avoid
>
At 16:40 1/3/2005, Dario wrote:
>ahhh, that global DNS based GLST derived blacklist would be perfect,
>but would that have an impact on legitimate e-mail?
*Any* DNSBL can have an impact on legitimate email. There is no way to
avoid this possibility completely without simply not using them.
-
To
I've set up an instance of Xmail's SMTP to listen on port 587, but I
haven't gone to the trouble to require SMTP AUTH on that port yet. I also
set up stunnel to allow secure connections on port 465.
I would love for Xmail to have an MSA implementation on port 587 that
required AUTH and allowed
straight at the server.
I don't know if all this makes any sense to you, as I know there is at
least some language barrier here. But hopefully it will make enough sense
so you can see where to proceed from here.
Tracy
PS: I am not an expert in these matters, and my understanding may be
fla
At 09:53 11/19/2004, Jason J. Ellingson wrote:
>I think that would work great for an end-point mail server. You could never
>do that if you were hosting emails for others. I have users on
>###-###.dsl.net addresses that have email accounts on my servers. They
>wouldn't be able to send emails.
T
At 09:20 11/19/2004, Jason J. Ellingson wrote:
>For those using my XMail AV filter for Win32, I thought I'd give you an
>update on AV testing...
>
>I've been testing F-Prot, McAfee, and Sophos for a couple weeks now and
>after several thousands of emails we have a definite winner...
>
>F-Prot is by
Um, perhaps I'm missing something obvious here, but... POP3 is not involved
in the sending of messages, hence there is no reason for POP3
authentication to be used when sending messages.
If you want to use external authentication for sending messages then you
need to set up SMTP authentication.
At 19:22 11/11/2004, Jeffrey Laramie wrote:
>Hi All-
>
>The mail server belonging to a client of mine "mail.client.com" uses another
>server "relay.client.com" to relay outgoing mail. mail.client.com appears to
>be correctly configured but relay.client.com doesn't resolve. Mail from this
>domain is
At 19:22 11/11/2004, Jeffrey Laramie wrote:
>Hi All-
>
>The mail server belonging to a client of mine "mail.client.com" uses another
>server "relay.client.com" to relay outgoing mail. mail.client.com appears to
>be correctly configured but relay.client.com doesn't resolve. Mail from this
>domain is
At 07:34 11/11/2004, S=F6nke Ruempler wrote:
>You did not understand me. In my case is not the recipient invalid, but =3D
>the
>sender ! Xmail accepts the Mail while an Exchange behind Xmail doesn't.
True. This is one of those situations where using a connection to the=20
forwarded server at pre-d
At 02:03 11/11/2004, S=F6nke Ruempler wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wednesday, November 10, 2004 4:01 =3D
>PM:
>
> > Why are you accepting, then bouncing, mail? In today's
> > climate of widely=3D3D20
> > forged envelope senders, it doesn't make sense to accept then bounce
> > - as=3D3D20 much
At 02:12 11/10/2004, S=F6nke Ruempler wrote:
>hi,
>
>I noticed that XMail accepts addresses like:
>
>MAIL FROM:
>
>Is that right? If Xmail bounces this address, the bounce goes to
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] ?!
I can't speak to whether or not Xmail should accept the mail, nor where it=
=20
might go if bou
This came across one of the spam lists and I was wondering if these would
be caught as invalid addresses by Xmail?
> > In: MAIL FROM:<@>
> > Out: 501 Bad address syntax
>
>Nice. Bruce G. checks for the following (and so do I now):
>
>
><.>
><%>
><*>
><+>
><->
>
>
>I'd only seen so far. Yay! O
And this has what, exactly, to do with XMail?
At 15:14 10/14/2004, Edinilson J. Santos wrote:
>http://www.jeftel.com
>
>
>Edinilson
>-
>ATINET-Professional Web Hosting
>Tel Voz: (0xx11) 4412-0876
>http://www.atinet.com.br
>
>
>
>---
>Outgoing
Returning a 550 error in the protocol session does not send an NDN message
to the forged sender. It rejects the message before delivery is accepted.
The only way I can see sending the message to your administrative account
would be to have the filter create a new message using the content your
At 17:44 9/14/2004, Davide Libenzi wrote:
>On Tue, 14 Sep 2004, kalinga wrote:
>
> > We installed an Xmail server in our organisation, now we want to create a
> > LDAP Address book on this mail server, Does Xmailserver supports
> > LDAP intergartion?
>
>No, XMail does not talk LDAP.
However, filte
More like, he's trying to set up a MSA port (RFC 2476) for user submission
of email independent of location.
MSA (port 587) - direct-to-MX client submissions, requires authentication.
MTA-to-MTA submissions not allowed here.
SMTP (port 25) - MTA-to-MTA submissions, doesn't require authenticatio
At 11:52 8/18/2004, Bill Healy wrote:
>Here's the first one you thought shouldn't match broken down
>210-20-54-173.rev.home.ne.jp matched pattern *-*-*-*.home.ne.jp
>* matches 210
>- matches -
>* matches 20
>- matches -
>* matches 54
>- matches -
>* matches 173.rev
>..home.ne.jp matches .home.ne.jp
I know Davide is gone and all, but this was kind of weird and I wanted to
see if anyone else had noticed it.
I've made a couple of custom mods to the xmail source code so that I can
block on RDNS patterns (as well as MAIL FROM patterns). However, none of my
modifications touched any of the str
At 00:16 7/30/2004, Gerald V. Livingston II wrote:
>Besides, I can write a script with all the grep commands in it and train a
>monkey to handle the initial searches so all I have to look at is log snips
>with relevant info (of course, working for a small company, I have no
>monkeys to train).
You
At 19:32 7/28/2004, Gerald V. Livingston II wrote:
>With one exception. Using SMTP AUTH I know who's account to shut down for
>abuse without ever having to leave the mail log and cross reference a
>connection log. Especailly if the user is sending mail while connected via
>some other ISP or corport
At 14:28 7/28/2004, Shiloh Jennings wrote:
>Personally, I think it is a better idea to require everybody to use SMTP
>AUTH to relay. Trusting IPs opens the door to a lot of relaying,
>especially when one of the PCs gets a virus on it. Even using POP
>before SMTP is a bad idea in my opinion becaus
At 09:13 7/28/2004, Jeffrey Laramie wrote:
>While looking at the report from dnsreports.com I see that they are warning
>that my mail server doesn't accept "domain literals". I seem to recall
>reading somewhere recently that this was no longer required or even
>desirable. Any thoughts on this? If I
e it for you, or delegate a reverse
> > lookup zone to you.
> >
>
>Yeah, this is pretty weird. I have my own name servers and I've always had
>RDNS configured I assume correctly. Now nobody can do the lookup outside my
>LAN. Based on the 'dig' that Tracy did, the loo
At 16:23 7/27/2004, Jeffrey Laramie wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> nslookup
>Note: nslookup is deprecated and may be removed from future releases.
>Consider using the `dig' or `host' programs instead. Run nslookup with
>the `-sil[ent]' option to prevent this message from appearing.
> > set type=ptr
At 15:42 7/27/2004, Jeffrey Laramie wrote:
>Hey Folks,
>
>I just had an email bounced back saying my mail server doesn't have a reverse
>DNS entry:
>
> > [<00>] XMail bounce: [EMAIL PROTECTED];Error=[554 5.7.1 The
> > server sending your mail [209.12.136.106] does not have a reverse DNS
> > entry.
At 12:40 7/12/2004, Bowen Moursund wrote:
> > Whitelist non-routable addresses if you must use them?
>
>All IPs are being rejected, not just local LAN addresses.
Show some log entries for non-local IP addresses.
I'm using 1.20 locally on Windows 2000 Server, with about a dozen DNSBLs,
with no p
At 12:15 7/12/2004, Bowen Moursund wrote:
> > At 11:54 7/12/2004, Bowen Moursund wrote:
> > >"192.168.1.104"
> >
> > That's a non-routable address,
>
>Yes, I know.
>
> > and should not be checked
> > against a DNSBL.
> > Any DNSBL should (legitimately) reject that address
>
>Well then why is X
At 11:54 7/12/2004, Bowen Moursund wrote:
>"192.168.1.104"
That's a non-routable address, and should not be checked against a DNSBL.
Any DNSBL should (legitimately) reject that address
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTE
1 - 100 of 376 matches
Mail list logo
