sip-implementors  

Messages by Date

• 2007/03/01 [Sip-implementors] What happens to the ongoing call Abu Muttalib
• 2007/02/28 Re: [Sip-implementors] rfc3261: why lr excluded for redirect andregister Contact Sanjay Sinha \(sanjsinh\)
• 2007/02/28 Re: [Sip-implementors] Music on Hold Satyendra Tiwari
• 2007/02/28 Re: [Sip-implementors] Unsolicited NOTIFY Paul Kyzivat
• 2007/02/28 Re: [Sip-implementors] New Transaction Gary Cote
• 2007/02/28 Re: [Sip-implementors] Unsolicited NOTIFY Dale . Worley
• 2007/02/28 [Sip-implementors] New Transaction Mandeep Ahuja
• 2007/02/28 Re: [Sip-implementors] rfc3455 P-Called-Party-ID Jeroen van Bemmel
• 2007/02/28 Re: [Sip-implementors] Unsolicited NOTIFY Brett Tate
• 2007/02/28 [Sip-implementors] rfc3261: why lr excluded for redirect and register Contact Brett Tate
• 2007/02/28 Re: [Sip-implementors] Unsolicited NOTIFY Paul Kyzivat
• 2007/02/28 [Sip-implementors] Subscription Use examples Vick, Steven
• 2007/02/28 Re: [Sip-implementors] Unsolicited NOTIFY Brett Tate
• 2007/02/28 Re: [Sip-implementors] Unsolicited NOTIFY Paul Kyzivat
• 2007/02/28 Re: [Sip-implementors] Unsolicited NOTIFY Dale . Worley
• 2007/02/28 Re: [Sip-implementors] Regarding Call hold Dale . Worley
• 2007/02/28 Re: [Sip-implementors] Unsolicited NOTIFY [EMAIL PROTECTED]
• 2007/02/28 [Sip-implementors] Comparison of SDP variants between RFC 4566 and RFC 2327 Albrecht . Schwarz
• 2007/02/28 Re: [Sip-implementors] Unsolicited NOTIFY Dale . Worley
• 2007/02/28 Re: [Sip-implementors] What happens to the ongoing call Paul Kyzivat
• 2007/02/28 Re: [Sip-implementors] Unsolicited NOTIFY [EMAIL PROTECTED]
• 2007/02/28 Re: [Sip-implementors] Unsolicited NOTIFY Dale . Worley
• 2007/02/28 Re: [Sip-implementors] What happens to the ongoing call Pravesh
• 2007/02/28 Re: [Sip-implementors] Unsolicited NOTIFY Joegen E. Baclor
• 2007/02/28 Re: [Sip-implementors] rfc3455 P-Called-Party-ID stefaan . willaert
• 2007/02/28 Re: [Sip-implementors] What happens to the ongoing call Joegen E. Baclor
• 2007/02/28 [Sip-implementors] Fwd: What happens to the ongoing call zhang jw
• 2007/02/28 Re: [Sip-implementors] rfc3455 P-Called-Party-ID Vikram Chhibber
• 2007/02/28 [Sip-implementors] What happens to the ongoing call Abu Mohammad Muttalib
• 2007/02/28 Re: [Sip-implementors] Unsolicited NOTIFY Vikram Chhibber
• 2007/02/28 [Sip-implementors] SMS Giuseppe Teresi
• 2007/02/28 Re: [Sip-implementors] 408 request timeout Raghu . Gangi
• 2007/02/27 [Sip-implementors] 408 request timeout varun
• 2007/02/27 [Sip-implementors] Music on Hold varun
• 2007/02/27 Re: [Sip-implementors] Regarding Call hold Satyendra Tiwari
• 2007/02/27 Re: [Sip-implementors] RFC 2327 SDP "c=" line question Paul Kyzivat
• 2007/02/27 Re: [Sip-implementors] Info on port 5070 Scott Lawrence
• 2007/02/27 Re: [Sip-implementors] Info on port 5070 Michael Procter
• 2007/02/27 Re: [Sip-implementors] RFC 2327 SDP "c=" line question Dale . Worley
• 2007/02/27 [Sip-implementors] Info on port 5070 Thirumal Margabandhu
• 2007/02/27 [Sip-implementors] rfc3455 P-Called-Party-Id stefaan . willaert
• 2007/02/27 Re: [Sip-implementors] ACK retrans in UAC Dale . Worley
• 2007/02/27 Re: [Sip-implementors] How to update registrar bindings when Call-ID is different Dale . Worley
• 2007/02/27 Re: [Sip-implementors] Unsolicited NOTIFY Paul Kyzivat
• 2007/02/27 Re: [Sip-implementors] How to update registrar bindings when Call-ID is different Paul Kyzivat
• 2007/02/27 Re: [Sip-implementors] ACK retrans in UAC Joegen E. Baclor
• 2007/02/27 Re: [Sip-implementors] ACK retrans in UAC John Williams
• 2007/02/27 [Sip-implementors] rfc3455 P-Called-Party-ID stefaan . willaert
• 2007/02/27 Re: [Sip-implementors] registration of multiple public user identities Dutt Kalapatapu
• 2007/02/27 Re: [Sip-implementors] SCSCF Registrar functionality Dutt Kalapatapu
• 2007/02/26 Re: [Sip-implementors] Target refresh requests Frank Shearar
• 2007/02/26 Re: [Sip-implementors] SCSCF Registrar functionality Vikram Chhibber
• 2007/02/26 Re: [Sip-implementors] ACK retrans in UAC Vikram Chhibber
• 2007/02/26 Re: [Sip-implementors] Unsolicited NOTIFY Vikram Chhibber
• 2007/02/26 Re: [Sip-implementors] SCSCF Registrar functionality Jamkhandikar, Sunil
• 2007/02/26 Re: [Sip-implementors] Regarding Call hold Kannaiyan
• 2007/02/26 Re: [Sip-implementors] ACK retrans in UAC Sanjay Sinha \(sanjsinh\)
• 2007/02/26 Re: [Sip-implementors] How to update registrar bindings when Call-ID is different Tang Xi
• 2007/02/26 [Sip-implementors] SIMPLE - Presence Dictionary compression Christian M Menkens
• 2007/02/26 [Sip-implementors] ACK retrans in UAC John Williams
• 2007/02/26 Re: [Sip-implementors] changing IP address for sub register messages erol turac
• 2007/02/26 [Sip-implementors] Regarding Call hold Revathi Veluchamy
• 2007/02/26 Re: [Sip-implementors] SCSCF Registrar functionality Gary Cote
• 2007/02/26 Re: [Sip-implementors] Target refresh requests Bob Penfield
• 2007/02/26 [Sip-implementors] SCSCF Registrar functionality Jamkhandikar, Sunil
• 2007/02/26 Re: [Sip-implementors] Target refresh requests John Williams
• 2007/02/26 [Sip-implementors] Target refresh requests Frank Shearar
• 2007/02/25 Re: [Sip-implementors] RFC 2327 SDP "c=" line question Anders Kristensen
• 2007/02/24 Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP registrar info - why from and to fileds are same Dutt Kalapatapu
• 2007/02/24 Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP fundamental question Raghu . Gangi
• 2007/02/24 [Sip-implementors] SIP fundamental question Anil Chaudhary
• 2007/02/24 Re: [Sip-implementors] changing IP address for sub register messages Dale . Worley
• 2007/02/24 Re: [Sip-implementors] changing IP address for sub register messages Scott Lawrence
• 2007/02/24 Re: [Sip-implementors] changing IP address for sub register messages Bob Penfield
• 2007/02/24 Re: [Sip-implementors] changing IP address for sub register messages Bob Penfield
• 2007/02/24 Re: [Sip-implementors] changing IP address for sub register messages Paul Kyzivat
• 2007/02/24 Re: [Sip-implementors] changing IP address for sub register messages erol turac
• 2007/02/24 Re: [Sip-implementors] changing IP address for sub register messages Dale . Worley
• 2007/02/24 Re: [Sip-implementors] RFC 2327 SDP "c=" line question Dale . Worley
• 2007/02/24 Re: [Sip-implementors] changing IP address for sub register messages Dale . Worley
• 2007/02/24 Re: [Sip-implementors] Regarding ABNF and yacc Dale . Worley
• 2007/02/23 [Sip-implementors] Regarding ABNF and yacc Bin Chen
• 2007/02/23 Re: [Sip-implementors] changing IP address for sub register messages Scott Lawrence
• 2007/02/23 Re: [Sip-implementors] changing IP address for sub register messages erol turac
• 2007/02/23 Re: [Sip-implementors] changing IP address for sub register messages Scott Lawrence
• 2007/02/23 Re: [Sip-implementors] changing IP address for sub register messages erol turac
• 2007/02/23 Re: [Sip-implementors] RFC 2327 SDP "c=" line question AHR
• 2007/02/23 Re: [Sip-implementors] changing IP address for sub register messages Scott Lawrence
• 2007/02/23 Re: [Sip-implementors] changing IP address for sub register messages erol turac
• 2007/02/23 Re: [Sip-implementors] RFC 2327 SDP "c=" line question Attila Sipos
• 2007/02/23 Re: [Sip-implementors] RFC 2327 SDP "c=" line question Yong Xin
• 2007/02/23 Re: [Sip-implementors] RFC 2327 SDP "c=" line question Paul Kyzivat
• 2007/02/23 [Sip-implementors] RFC 2327 SDP "c=" line question Yong Xin
• 2007/02/23 Re: [Sip-implementors] changing IP address for sub register messages Scott Lawrence
• 2007/02/23 [Sip-implementors] changing IP address for sub register messages erol turac
• 2007/02/23 Re: [Sip-implementors] Unsolicited NOTIFY Brett Tate
• 2007/02/22 Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP for G729 codec cape canaveral
• 2007/02/22 Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP for G729 codec Tadkod . Vyanktesh
• 2007/02/22 Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Paul Kyzivat
• 2007/02/22 Re: [Sip-implementors] Unsolicited NOTIFY Scott Lawrence
• 2007/02/22 Re: [Sip-implementors] Sip-implementors Digest, Vol 47, Issue 32 Manpreet Singh
• 2007/02/22 Re: [Sip-implementors] FW: SDP and ptime in RFC4566 is faulty Dale . Worley
• 2007/02/22 Re: [Sip-implementors] FW: SDP and ptime in RFC4566 is faulty Vick, Steven
• 2007/02/22 Re: [Sip-implementors] FW: SDP and ptime in RFC4566 is faulty Dale . Worley
• 2007/02/22 [Sip-implementors] SDP for G729 codec Tadkod . Vyanktesh
• 2007/02/22 Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Victor Paulsamy
• 2007/02/22 Re: [Sip-implementors] FW: SDP and ptime in RFC4566 is faulty stevevick
• 2007/02/22 [Sip-implementors] registration of multiple public user identities Sigrid Thijs
• 2007/02/22 Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP for G729 codec Attila Sipos
• 2007/02/21 [Sip-implementors] SDP for G729 codec Tadkod . Vyanktesh
• 2007/02/21 Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Paul Kyzivat
• 2007/02/21 Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Paul Kyzivat
• 2007/02/21 Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Paul Kyzivat
• 2007/02/21 Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Nebojsa Miljanovic
• 2007/02/21 Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Jerry Yin
• 2007/02/21 Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP and ptime in RFC4566 is faulty Dale . Worley
• 2007/02/21 Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Nebojsa Miljanovic
• 2007/02/21 Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Sarkar, Uttam
• 2007/02/21 Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Jerry Yin
• 2007/02/21 Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP registrar info - why from and to fileds are same Paul Kyzivat
• 2007/02/21 [Sip-implementors] Grouped DTMF's RFC 2833 Mandeep Ahuja
• 2007/02/21 Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP registrar info - why from and to fileds are same Gary Cote
• 2007/02/21 Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP and ptime in RFC4566 is faulty Vick, Steven
• 2007/02/21 Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP registrar info - why from and to fileds aresame Michael Procter
• 2007/02/21 Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP registrar info - why from and to fileds aresame Sarkar, Uttam
• 2007/02/21 [Sip-implementors] SIP registrar info - why from and to fileds are same Thirumal Margabandhu
• 2007/02/20 Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP Options message retransmission raghuram gangi
• 2007/02/20 [Sip-implementors] Unsolicited NOTIFY Chulhoon Hwang
• 2007/02/20 [Sip-implementors] I-D on implementing GRUU Dale . Worley
• 2007/02/20 [Sip-implementors] I-D on practical requirements for the dialog event package Dale . Worley
• 2007/02/20 Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP and ptime in RFC4566 is faulty Dale . Worley
• 2007/02/20 [Sip-implementors] SDP and ptime in RFC4566 is faulty Vick, Steven
• 2007/02/20 Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Paul Kyzivat
• 2007/02/20 [Sip-implementors] SIP Options message retransmission varun
• 2007/02/20 Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Attila Sipos
• 2007/02/20 Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Nebojsa Miljanovic
• 2007/02/20 Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Sanjay Sinha \(sanjsinh\)
• 2007/02/20 Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Jerry Yin
• 2007/02/20 Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Paul Kyzivat
• 2007/02/20 Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Paul Kyzivat
• 2007/02/20 Re: [Sip-implementors] SIPS in TO-FROM header but UDP Gary Cote
• 2007/02/20 Re: [Sip-implementors] Distinguishing SUBSCRIBE refresh and full-statequery??? Sanjay Sinha \(sanjsinh\)
• 2007/02/20 Re: [Sip-implementors] Selection of transport protocol Dale . Worley
• 2007/02/20 Re: [Sip-implementors] Selection of transport protocol Einat Soudry
• 2007/02/19 [Sip-implementors] Distinguishing SUBSCRIBE refresh and full-state query??? Vikram Chhibber
• 2007/02/19 Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Sanjay Sinha \(sanjsinh\)
• 2007/02/19 Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Sweeney, Andrew \(Andrew\)
• 2007/02/19 Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x AHR
• 2007/02/19 [Sip-implementors] SDP filling up o= field using NTP. PLS HELP AHR
• 2007/02/19 Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Christer Holmberg \(JO/LMF\)
• 2007/02/19 Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Attila Sipos
• 2007/02/19 Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Christer Holmberg \(JO/LMF\)
• 2007/02/19 Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Attila Sipos
• 2007/02/19 Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Christer Holmberg \(JO/LMF\)
• 2007/02/19 Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Christer Holmberg \(JO/LMF\)
• 2007/02/19 Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Rajnish Jain
• 2007/02/19 Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Dale . Worley
• 2007/02/19 [Sip-implementors] free sip server supporting presence for windows ce messenger rakesh kushwaha
• 2007/02/19 Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Sweeney, Andrew \(Andrew\)
• 2007/02/19 [Sip-implementors] Reg Poc Presence Testing karthik
• 2007/02/19 Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Christer Holmberg \(JO/LMF\)
• 2007/02/19 Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Ira Kadin
• 2007/02/19 Re: [Sip-implementors] Modification of RESPONSE code by Proxy Server Scott Lawrence
• 2007/02/19 Re: [Sip-implementors] Is Max-Forward mandatory also in ACK and CANCEL requests Scott Lawrence
• 2007/02/18 Re: [Sip-implementors] Record Route and top Via Joegen E. Baclor
• 2007/02/18 Re: [Sip-implementors] ACK in statefull proxy. Joegen E. Baclor
• 2007/02/17 [Sip-implementors] Record Route and top Via Bin Chen
• 2007/02/17 [Sip-implementors] SIPS in TO-FROM header but UDP Deepak . Mawandia
• 2007/02/17 [Sip-implementors] ACK in statefull proxy. Ivar Lumi
• 2007/02/16 Re: [Sip-implementors] Is Max-Forward mandatory also in ACK and CANCELrequests Attila Sipos
• 2007/02/16 Re: [Sip-implementors] Is Max-Forward mandatory also in ACK and CANCELrequests Attila Sipos
• 2007/02/16 [Sip-implementors] Is Max-Forward mandatory also in ACK and CANCEL requests Marco Ambu
• 2007/02/16 Re: [Sip-implementors] Any known implementations/products supporting RFC 3578 ? Olle E Johansson
• 2007/02/15 Re: [Sip-implementors] Modification of RESPONSE code by Proxy Server raghuram gangi
• 2007/02/15 Re: [Sip-implementors] Modification of RESPONSE code by Proxy Server Sanjay Sinha \(sanjsinh\)
• 2007/02/15 Re: [Sip-implementors] Modification of RESPONSE code by Proxy Server Attila Sipos
• 2007/02/15 Re: [Sip-implementors] Modification of RESPONSE code by Proxy Server Paul Kyzivat
• 2007/02/15 Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Attila Sipos
• 2007/02/15 Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Nebojsa Miljanovic
• 2007/02/15 Re: [Sip-implementors] Modification of RESPONSE code by Proxy Server Sanjay Sinha \(sanjsinh\)
• 2007/02/15 Re: [Sip-implementors] Selection of transport protocol Sanjay Sinha \(sanjsinh\)
• 2007/02/15 [Sip-implementors] Modification of RESPONSE code by Proxy Server raghuram gangi
• 2007/02/15 Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Christer Holmberg \(JO/LMF\)
• 2007/02/15 Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Christer Holmberg \(JO/LMF\)
• 2007/02/15 Re: [Sip-implementors] Selection of transport protocol Einat Soudry
• 2007/02/15 Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Attila Sipos
• 2007/02/15 Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Meir Leshem
• 2007/02/14 Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x erol turac
• 2007/02/14 Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Ira Kadin
• 2007/02/14 [Sip-implementors] Persistent TLS and NAT Nenad Milidrag
• 2007/02/14 Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Sanjay Sinha \(sanjsinh\)
• 2007/02/14 Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Paul Kyzivat
• 2007/02/14 [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Nebojsa Miljanovic
• 2007/02/14 [Sip-implementors] Implementation of H.264 in SIP Express Router! Steven Wong
• 2007/02/14 Re: [Sip-implementors] Regarding Branch ID Dale . Worley
• 2007/02/14 Re: [Sip-implementors] Regarding Branch ID Prithvi
• 2007/02/14 Re: [Sip-implementors] Selection of transport protocol Sanjay Sinha \(sanjsinh\)
• 2007/02/14 [Sip-implementors] Regarding Branch ID Gayathri Madda
• 2007/02/14 Re: [Sip-implementors] URI syntax in Refer-To header Dmitry Akindinov
• 2007/02/14 Re: [Sip-implementors] URI syntax in Refer-To header Dmitry Akindinov

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]