We ere actually looking at how many megawatts were needed for
activation. It appears that the models are excessive conservative on
this issue.
If we wanted to relate excessive clearance over storage with high
ceiling performance (not an unreasonable leap), then the annex (A.
12.1.3.4) confirms that the K-11.2 and larger performs better. For
those of you that have one of the initial printings of 13, this
section has an Errata since it initially said "larger orifice
sprinkler K-5.6 and larger". Since NO ONE considers a 5.6 as being
larger, it was an easy one to catch.
Roland
On Sep 10, 2008, at 10:32 AM, Thom McMahon wrote:
Roland? What was that arena you did a model of with 1/2" orifice
heads? 120'
AFF?
Thom McMahon, SET
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
