Thank you Roland.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roland Huggins Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 3:36 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Residential sprinkler spray obstruction It was added to the 2007 edition of 13R (A.6.7.7.1.5.6). The lower level of protection for a 13R system doesn't impact this issue since it is inside the room verses unoccupied and concealed spaces. A somewhat related proposal was accepted at the ROP meeting. Proposal 13-496 effective mimicked the Architectural Feature text from 13D whereby 18 sf of shadowed floor area is allowed. Roland On Sep 10, 2008, at 11:57 AM, Arthur Tiroly wrote: > I know this has been discussed before but I can't find a paragraph > showing > how a small wall offset with 4 SF of floor area that is not > protected will > not require an additional sprinkler in all the bedrooms in the > nursing wing. > I understand the obstruction principal but need NFPA 13 to spell it > out for > the inspector. > > Is there a paragraph I that will explain it? > > Art > ATCO fire > > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum > For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field) > _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field) _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
