Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
JeffM wrote:
JeffM wrote:
Whenever I see these long diatribes about SeaMonkey,
I note that they never mention the authors' participation
in the Release Candidate trial/review process.
Jay Garcia wrote:
What else is required other than to be a "user",
A critique that comes as late as so many of these do
could easily be characterized as "bitching".
OTOH, those folks who are prone to complaining
*should* be the ones who point out shortcomings
**when something can more easily be done about those**
i.e. **early** aka **during pre-release**.
All right , then where does the developer coouncil/
governing body publish the details of the planned
changes to be introduced in the next release, so that
interested users can make their comments known
**early** aka **during pre-release**.
(and then how closely do they follow/stick to
these published plans?)
:) :) :) :) ......
I would bet they weren't planning to break the address book for 2.2, and I'm
sure the new development cycle has little/no time for testing before release.
And due to the lack of 2.3 I assume there's not going to be any OMG response to
address book breakage.
--
Bill Davidsen <david...@tmr.com>
We are not out of the woods yet, but we know the direction and have
taken the first step. The steps are many, but finite in number, and if
we persevere we will reach our destination. -me, 2010
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
