On 18/07/2011 10:46, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: > JeffM wrote: >>> JeffM wrote: >>>> Whenever I see these long diatribes about SeaMonkey, >>>> I note that they never mention the authors' participation >>>> in the Release Candidate trial/review process. >>>> >> Jay Garcia wrote: >>> What else is required other than to be a "user", >>> >> A critique that comes as late as so many of these do >> could easily be characterized as "bitching". >> >> OTOH, those folks who are prone to complaining >> *should* be the ones who point out shortcomings >> **when something can more easily be done about those** >> i.e. **early** aka **during pre-release**. >> > All right , then where does the developer coouncil/ > governing body publish the details of the planned > changes to be introduced in the next release, so that > interested users can make their comments known > **early** aka **during pre-release**. > (and then how closely do they follow/stick to > these published plans?) > :) :) :) :) ......
For the 2.1 development process: https://wiki.mozilla.org/SeaMonkey:Features:2.1 https://wiki.mozilla.org/SeaMonkey/Features/2.2 https://wiki.mozilla.org/SeaMonkey/Features/2.3 Phil -- Philip Chee <phi...@aleytys.pc.my>, <philip.c...@gmail.com> http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief, oh Night, and so be good for us to pass. _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
