> > Of course, none of these multi-platform alternatives is as "shiny, shiny" as > Skype. And Skype isn't anywhere remotely as "shiny, shiny" as Facetime. > > Give it a few months, and I'm sure you'll start to see Facetime clients pop > up on other OSes -- helping make that happen through "real deal" Internet > standards-based standards is more to the benefit of Apple than any > proprietary alternative, and helps them avoid the Microsoft/Google/Skype > Hegemony.
background: I have never used skype nor facetime. Wikipedia says (about facetime): FaceTime is based on numerous technologies: * H.264 and AAC – video and audio codecs respectively * SIP – IETF signaling protocol for VoIP * STUN, TURN and ICE – IETF technologies for traversing firewalls and NAT * RTP and SRTP – IETF standards for delivering real-time and encrypted media streams for VoIP If I read this right, chances are that factime is "just" a very good client to standard protocols (and yes some libraries will do a better job at encoding/decoding H264), which would mean that: -you can always use facetime to talk to other program on other platform, or even a physical SIP phone, so not in a few months, but today -my understanding is that skype is three things: -a very good client -a very good proprietary protocol (as in, better than the standard one) -they pool network connections to get more bandwidth I don't know of any standard protocol which steals^H^H^H^H^H^H use your neighbour's bandwidth to improve your connection, so unless facetime does something tricky like this, or also use a proprietary protocol (in addition to the standard ones) that's even better than skype's, I wonder how they can be that much better. -- Yves. http://www.SollerS.ca/ http://images.SollerS.ca/ xmpp:y...@zioup.com _______________________________________________ Tech mailing list Tech@lopsa.org http://lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/