On Wednesday, October 28, 2020 at 1:50:44 PM UTC+1, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > *Regarding User Possibility To Set Markup Glyphs?* > > TonyM wrote: >> >> >> *Question - customised Glyphs, a glyph too far?* >> >> - As you can see the wide range of glyphs available that have meaning >> or structure makes me wish to ask if we could allow the user to nominate >> glyphs either single (line/para/blocks) or pairs for inline or block. ie >> customise the customise glyphs. >> >> > Ciao TonyM & PMario > > IF this were possible I WOULD use it. >
... need to think about it. But it would make configuration a hell lot more complex. > Why? Because the kinds of Markup I do would benefit from me being able to > choose glyphs VISUALLY SUITED to the purpose. > For instance, for simple paragraphs ... > > ¶ Start of a paragraph, > more of the same pargraph endedon the next line. > ⁋ <--- End String > > I understand if its not possible. > It would be possible to use pilcrows as "start" and "end" of a paragraph, but I don't understand why. TW Pargraphs end with \n\n by default So the "reversed pilcrow" ⁋ <--- End String is redundant and for me personally it is confusing, since Libre Office and Word use: ¶ as a paragraph marker. ... It may be wrong, but it is shown at the *end* of a paragraph. ... So the reverse pilcrow feels completely wrong at that position. *I could implement:* ¶ some text \n\n Since it would be the right thing to do. see: Wikipedia Pilcrow <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pilcrow>. It would be easy to explain, with the link to Wikipedia. It will create a HTML P tag by default. If you want you can define an _endString. ... Default would be \n\n -mario -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywikidev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/861387d1-7ccc-490e-b75c-b55e76b1ea9bo%40googlegroups.com.
