On Wednesday, October 28, 2020 at 1:14:30 AM UTC+1, TonyM wrote: > > *A few observations.* > Again please don't be overwhelmed just consider these ideas please. Nor do > these ideas imply it demands your work, although in some cases that is most > likely. > > The key issue I am grappling with is the systemisation of glyphs, symbols > and the scope of customises wiki text. To make this easy to use and > remember. Presently I always need to lookup the reference material and > slowly construct wikitext, if its slow and hard for me (involved in this > project from the start) it may appear impossible to future new users. There > are differences in the way Mario, TT and myself envision this, until this > is cleared up even testing will be clumsy apart from helping future users. > > Observed - In a tiddlywiki without custom mark-up > This is some Text __.test Inline text ___ with more > fails gracefully > > ;This is some Text __.test Inline text _/ with more > Fails *un*gracefully. Disrupts future wiki text. >
You are right. ... I didn't consider this. ... But may be we should remove underline. It seems to cause more problems as it solves. And we do have enough other possibilities now. -m -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywikidev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/cb2f03ff-9eb6-4a5e-9ea5-c072ff964540o%40googlegroups.com.
