On Saturday, October 31, 2020 at 11:05:06 AM UTC+1, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: The use case I am thinking of is allow me to simplyfy & share with others > an approach to correct manuscripts. > I work often using specialist software to proof edit articles & books for > publishers. > This uses a specific method and its own system of glyphs (based on > "printers' corrections"). > The software involved is very complex and expensive. > I believe there is a way I could do this work in TW using your Custom > Markup if I had a few special glyphs. > > I could explain it in detail if you wanted---but I don't want to overload > you more than we have already :-) >
*It would be interesting to know*. .. Otherwise may implement changes, that work against your usecase, because I don't know it. .. Which probably has happend already as using the pilcrow as a "paragraph" marker. ... Which makes it impossible to be used as an inline marker. ... -mario -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywikidev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/cecd0bdb-d337-42be-bc0e-c33b838e2c18o%40googlegroups.com.
