valhalla-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385328: [lworld] C2: assert(phi->_idx >= nodes_size()) failed: only new Phi per instance memory slice still happens after JDK-8374742 [v9] Dean Long
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385328: [lworld] C2: assert(phi->_idx >= nodes_size()) failed: only new Phi per instance memory slice still happens after JDK-8374742 [v9] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385328: [lworld] C2: assert(phi->_idx >= nodes_size()) failed: only new Phi per instance memory slice still happens after JDK-8374742 [v9] Roland Westrelin
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385328: [lworld] C2: assert(phi->_idx >= nodes_size()) failed: only new Phi per instance memory slice still happens after JDK-8374742 [v10] Dean Long
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385328: [lworld] C2: assert(phi->_idx >= nodes_size()) failed: only new Phi per instance memory slice still happens after JDK-8374742 [v10] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385328: [lworld] C2: assert(phi->_idx >= nodes_size()) failed: only new Phi per instance memory slice still happens after JDK-8374742 [v11] Roland Westrelin
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385328: [lworld] C2: assert(phi->_idx >= nodes_size()) failed: only new Phi per instance memory slice still happens after JDK-8374742 [v11] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385328: [lworld] C2: assert(phi->_idx >= nodes_size()) failed: only new Phi per instance memory slice still happens after JDK-8374742 [v11] Dean Long
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385328: [lworld] C2: assert(phi->_idx >= nodes_size()) failed: only new Phi per instance memory slice still happens after JDK-8374742 [v11] Roland Westrelin
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385328: [lworld] C2: assert(phi->_idx >= nodes_size()) failed: only new Phi per instance memory slice still happens after JDK-8374742 [v11] Tobias Hartmann
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8385328: [lworld] C2: assert(phi->_idx >= nodes_size()) failed: only new Phi per instance memory slice still happens after JDK-8374742 Roland Westrelin
• [lworld] RFR: 8385634: [lworld] Remove unnecessary coupling between Lower, Gen and LocalProxyVarsGen Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385634: [lworld] Remove unnecessary coupling between Lower, Gen and LocalProxyVarsGen [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385634: [lworld] Remove unnecessary coupling between Lower, Gen and LocalProxyVarsGen [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385634: [lworld] Remove unnecessary coupling between Lower, Gen and LocalProxyVarsGen [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385634: [lworld] Remove unnecessary coupling between Lower, Gen and LocalProxyVarsGen Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385634: [lworld] Remove unnecessary coupling between Lower, Gen and LocalProxyVarsGen [v3] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385634: [lworld] Remove unnecessary coupling between Lower, Gen and LocalProxyVarsGen [v3] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385634: [lworld] Remove unnecessary coupling between Lower, Gen and LocalProxyVarsGen [v4] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385634: [lworld] Remove unnecessary coupling between Lower, Gen and LocalProxyVarsGen [v4] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385634: [lworld] Remove unnecessary coupling between Lower, Gen and LocalProxyVarsGen [v5] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385634: [lworld] Remove unnecessary coupling between Lower, Gen and LocalProxyVarsGen [v6] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385634: [lworld] Remove unnecessary coupling between Lower, Gen and LocalProxyVarsGen [v6] Vicente Romero
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8385634: [lworld] Remove unnecessary coupling between Lower, Gen and LocalProxyVarsGen Maurizio Cimadamore
• [lworld] RFR: 8385629: [lworld] UnsetFieldInfo should be replaced by bit sets in Code.State Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385629: [lworld] UnsetFieldInfo should be replaced by bit sets in Code.State Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385629: [lworld] UnsetFieldInfo should be replaced by bit sets in Code.State Vicente Romero
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385629: [lworld] UnsetFieldInfo should be replaced by bit sets in Code.State Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385629: [lworld] UnsetFieldInfo should be replaced by bit sets in Code.State Vicente Romero
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385629: [lworld] UnsetFieldInfo should be replaced by bit sets in Code.State Vicente Romero
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385629: [lworld] UnsetFieldInfo should be replaced by bit sets in Code.State [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8385629: [lworld] UnsetFieldInfo should be replaced by bit sets in Code.State Maurizio Cimadamore
• [lworld] RFR: 8385600: [lworld] DA/DU issues with strict fields Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385600: [lworld] DA/DU issues with strict fields Vicente Romero
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385600: [lworld] DA/DU issues with strict fields [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385600: [lworld] DA/DU issues with strict fields [v2] Vicente Romero
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8385600: [lworld] DA/DU issues with strict fields Maurizio Cimadamore
• [lworld] RFR: 8325632: [lworld] C2 compilation fails with "matching stack sizes" Christian Hagedorn
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8325632: [lworld] C2 compilation fails with "matching stack sizes" Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8325632: [lworld] C2 compilation fails with "matching stack sizes" Christian Hagedorn
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8325632: [lworld] C2 compilation fails with "matching stack sizes" Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8325632: [lworld] C2 compilation fails with "matching stack sizes" [v2] Christian Hagedorn
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8325632: [lworld] C2 compilation fails with "matching stack sizes" [v2] Christian Hagedorn
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8325632: [lworld] C2 compilation fails with "matching stack sizes" Christian Hagedorn
• [lworld] RFR: 8385601: [lworld] Update testing documentation for the ValueClassPlugin jtreg option Bill Huang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385601: [lworld] Update testing documentation for the ValueClassPlugin jtreg option Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385601: [lworld] Update testing documentation for the ValueClassPlugin jtreg option [v2] Bill Huang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385601: [lworld] Update testing documentation for the ValueClassPlugin jtreg option [v2] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385601: [lworld] Update testing documentation for the ValueClassPlugin jtreg option [v2] duke
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385601: [lworld] Update testing documentation for the ValueClassPlugin jtreg option [v2] Chen Liang
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8385601: [lworld] Update testing documentation for the ValueClassPlugin jtreg option Bill Huang
• [lworld] RFR: 8385569: [lworld] Apply JDK-8343767 to Valhalla specific StubRoutines Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385569: [lworld] Apply JDK-8343767 to Valhalla specific StubRoutines Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385569: [lworld] Apply JDK-8343767 to Valhalla specific StubRoutines Frederic Parain
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385569: [lworld] Apply JDK-8343767 to Valhalla specific StubRoutines Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385569: [lworld] Apply JDK-8343767 to Valhalla specific StubRoutines Coleen Phillimore
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8385569: [lworld] Apply JDK-8343767 to Valhalla specific StubRoutines Coleen Phillimore
• [lworld] RFR: 8385581: [lworld] Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Manuel Hässig
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385581: [lworld] Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385581: [lworld] Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385581: [lworld] Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385581: [lworld] Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Joel Sikström
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385581: [lworld] Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385581: [lworld] Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Manuel Hässig
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385581: [lworld] Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385581: [lworld] Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385581: [lworld] Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Manuel Hässig
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8385581: [lworld] Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Manuel Hässig
• [lworld] RFR: 8384897: [lworld] this.staticField should be restricted in early construction context Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384897: [lworld] this.staticField should be restricted in early construction context Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384897: [lworld] this.staticField should be restricted in early construction context [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384897: [lworld] this.staticField should be restricted in early construction context [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384897: [lworld] this.staticField should be restricted in early construction context [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384897: [lworld] this.staticField should be restricted in early construction context [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384897: [lworld] this.staticField should be restricted in early construction context [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384897: [lworld] this.staticField should be restricted in early construction context [v3] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384897: [lworld] this.staticField should be restricted in early construction context [v3] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384897: [lworld] this.staticField should be restricted in early construction context [v4] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384897: [lworld] this.staticField should be restricted in early construction context [v5] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384897: [lworld] this.staticField should be restricted in early construction context [v6] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384897: [lworld] this.staticField should be restricted in early construction context [v6] Vicente Romero
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8384897: [lworld] this.staticField should be restricted in early construction context Maurizio Cimadamore
• [lworld] RFR: 8373598: [lworld] C2 asserts with "excessive live node increase in single iteration of IGVN" Marc Chevalier
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373598: [lworld] C2 asserts with "excessive live node increase in single iteration of IGVN" [v2] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373598: [lworld] C2 asserts with "excessive live node increase in single iteration of IGVN" [v2] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373598: [lworld] C2 asserts with "excessive live node increase in single iteration of IGVN" [v2] Marc Chevalier
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8373598: [lworld] C2 asserts with "excessive live node increase in single iteration of IGVN" Marc Chevalier
• [lworld] RFR: 8385553: [lworld] Clean up oops changes for review Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385553: [lworld] Clean up oops changes for review David Holmes
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385553: [lworld] Clean up oops changes for review Dean Long
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385553: [lworld] Clean up oops changes for review Dean Long
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385553: [lworld] Clean up oops changes for review Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385553: [lworld] Clean up oops changes for review [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385553: [lworld] Clean up oops changes for review [v3] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385553: [lworld] Clean up oops changes for review [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385553: [lworld] Clean up oops changes for review [v3] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385553: [lworld] Clean up oops changes for review [v3] Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385553: [lworld] Clean up oops changes for review [v3] Coleen Phillimore
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8385553: [lworld] Clean up oops changes for review Coleen Phillimore
• [lworld] RFR: 8385473: [lworld] Metaspace OOME not handled in ciObjArrayKlass::make_impl Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385473: [lworld] Metaspace OOME not handled in ciObjArrayKlass::make_impl Marc Chevalier
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385473: [lworld] Metaspace OOME not handled in ciObjArrayKlass::make_impl [v2] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385473: [lworld] Metaspace OOME not handled in ciObjArrayKlass::make_impl [v3] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385473: [lworld] Metaspace OOME not handled in ciObjArrayKlass::make_impl [v3] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385473: [lworld] Metaspace OOME not handled in ciObjArrayKlass::make_impl [v4] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385473: [lworld] Metaspace OOME not handled in ciObjArrayKlass::make_impl [v4] Tobias Hartmann
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8385473: [lworld] Metaspace OOME not handled in ciObjArrayKlass::make_impl Tobias Hartmann
• [lworld] RFR: 8385526: [lworld] Remove unused HotSpot leftovers added in lworld Joel Sikström
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385526: [lworld] Remove unused HotSpot leftovers added in lworld Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385526: [lworld] Remove unused HotSpot leftovers added in lworld Joel Sikström
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385526: [lworld] Remove unused HotSpot leftovers added in lworld Coleen Phillimore
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8385526: [lworld] Remove unused HotSpot leftovers added in lworld Joel Sikström
• [lworld] RFR: 8383935: [lworld] Remove commented out @IntrinsicCandidate annotations Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8383935: [lworld] Remove commented out @IntrinsicCandidate annotations Dean Long
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8383935: [lworld] Remove commented out @IntrinsicCandidate annotations Lois Foltan
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8383935: [lworld] Remove commented out @IntrinsicCandidate annotations Chen Liang
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8383935: [lworld] Remove commented out @IntrinsicCandidate annotations Chen Liang
• [lworld] RFR: 8385474: [lworld] Leftover JVM_IsValhallaEnabled and JVM_IsIdentityClass Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385474: [lworld] Leftover JVM_IsValhallaEnabled and JVM_IsIdentityClass Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385474: [lworld] Leftover JVM_IsValhallaEnabled and JVM_IsIdentityClass Frederic Parain
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385474: [lworld] Leftover JVM_IsValhallaEnabled and JVM_IsIdentityClass Coleen Phillimore
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8385474: [lworld] Leftover JVM_IsValhallaEnabled and JVM_IsIdentityClass Coleen Phillimore
• Result: New Valhalla Committer: Casper Norrbin Paul Hubner
• [lworld] RFR: 8382377: [lworld] The JvmtiHeapwalkObject(obj) set incorrect layout Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8382377: [lworld] The JvmtiHeapwalkObject(obj) set incorrect layout Frederic Parain
  • [lworld] Withdrawn: 8382377: [lworld] The JvmtiHeapwalkObject(obj) set incorrect layout Leonid Mesnik
• CFV: New Valhalla Committer: Manuel Hässig Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: CFV: New Valhalla Committer: Manuel Hässig Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: CFV: New Valhalla Committer: Manuel Hässig Marc Chevalier
  • Re: CFV: New Valhalla Committer: Manuel Hässig Christian Hagedorn
  • Re: CFV: New Valhalla Committer: Manuel Hässig Joel Sikstrom
  • Re: CFV: New Valhalla Committer: Manuel Hässig Lois Foltan
  • Re: CFV: New Valhalla Committer: Manuel Hässig Frederic Parain
  • Re: CFV: New Valhalla Committer: Manuel Hässig Chen Liang
• [lworld] RFR: 8370769: [lworld] C2 is too aggressive in scalarizing large value objects Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8370769: [lworld] C2 is too aggressive in scalarizing large value objects Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8370769: [lworld] C2 is too aggressive in scalarizing large value objects Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8370769: [lworld] C2 is too aggressive in scalarizing large value objects [v2] Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8370769: [lworld] C2 is too aggressive in scalarizing large value objects [v2] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8370769: [lworld] C2 is too aggressive in scalarizing large value objects [v2] Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8370769: [lworld] C2 is too aggressive in scalarizing large value objects [v2] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8370769: [lworld] C2 is too aggressive in scalarizing large value objects [v2] Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8370769: [lworld] C2 is too aggressive in scalarizing large value objects [v2] Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8370769: [lworld] C2 is too aggressive in scalarizing large value objects [v3] Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8370769: [lworld] C2 is too aggressive in scalarizing large value objects [v3] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8370769: [lworld] C2 is too aggressive in scalarizing large value objects [v3] Quan Anh Mai
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8370769: [lworld] C2 is too aggressive in scalarizing large value objects Quan Anh Mai
• [lworld] Integrated: 8385344: [lworld] ProblemList tools/javac/platform/CanHandleClassFilesTest.java with --enable-preview Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: [lworld] Integrated: 8385344: [lworld] ProblemList tools/javac/platform/CanHandleClassFilesTest.java with --enable-preview Frederic Parain
  • Re: [lworld] Integrated: 8385344: [lworld] ProblemList tools/javac/platform/CanHandleClassFilesTest.java with --enable-preview Daniel D . Daugherty
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8385344: [lworld] ProblemList tools/javac/platform/CanHandleClassFilesTest.java with --enable-preview Daniel D . Daugherty
• [lworld] RFR: 8385343: [lworld] Add ResourceMark for logging field names Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385343: [lworld] Add ResourceMark for logging field names Dean Long
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385343: [lworld] Add ResourceMark for logging field names Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385343: [lworld] Add ResourceMark for logging field names Lois Foltan
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385343: [lworld] Add ResourceMark for logging field names Coleen Phillimore
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8385343: [lworld] Add ResourceMark for logging field names Coleen Phillimore
• [lworld] RFR: 8384756: [lworld] Exclude class from archive if class of inline field is excluded Matias Saavedra Silva
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384756: [lworld] Exclude class from archive if class of inline field is excluded Frederic Parain
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384756: [lworld] Exclude class from archive if class of inline field is excluded Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384756: [lworld] Exclude class from archive if class of inline field is excluded Matias Saavedra Silva
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384756: [lworld] Exclude class from archive if class of inline field is excluded Frederic Parain
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384756: [lworld] Exclude class from archive if class of inline field is excluded Frederic Parain
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384756: [lworld] Exclude class from archive if class of inline field is excluded [v2] Matias Saavedra Silva
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384756: [lworld] Exclude class from archive if class of inline field is excluded [v2] Ioi Lam
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384756: [lworld] Exclude class from archive if class of inline field is excluded [v2] Matias Saavedra Silva
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384756: [lworld] Exclude class from archive if class of inline field is excluded [v3] Matias Saavedra Silva
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384756: [lworld] Exclude class from archive if class of inline field is excluded [v3] Frederic Parain
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384756: [lworld] Exclude class from archive if class of inline field is excluded [v4] Matias Saavedra Silva
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384756: [lworld] Exclude class from archive if class of inline field is excluded [v4] Frederic Parain
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384756: [lworld] Exclude class from archive if class of inline field is excluded [v4] Dan Heidinga
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384756: [lworld] Exclude class from archive if class of inline field is excluded [v5] Matias Saavedra Silva
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384756: [lworld] Exclude class from archive if class of inline field is excluded [v5] Dan Heidinga
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384756: [lworld] Exclude class from archive if class of inline field is excluded [v6] Matias Saavedra Silva
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384756: [lworld] Exclude class from archive if class of inline field is excluded [v6] Ioi Lam
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384756: [lworld] Exclude class from archive if class of inline field is excluded [v7] Matias Saavedra Silva
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384756: [lworld] Exclude class from archive if class of inline field is excluded [v7] Ioi Lam
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384756: [lworld] Exclude class from archive if class of inline field is excluded [v7] Dan Heidinga
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384756: [lworld] Exclude class from archive if class of inline field is excluded [v7] Frederic Parain
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384756: [lworld] Exclude class from archive if class of inline field is excluded [v7] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384756: [lworld] Exclude class from archive if class of inline field is excluded [v7] Matias Saavedra Silva
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384756: [lworld] Exclude class from archive if class of inline field is excluded [v7] Matias Saavedra Silva
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384756: [lworld] Exclude class from archive if class of inline field is excluded [v7] Frederic Parain
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384756: [lworld] Exclude class from archive if class of inline field is excluded [v8] Matias Saavedra Silva
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384756: [lworld] Exclude class from archive if class of inline field is excluded [v8] Dan Heidinga
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384756: [lworld] Exclude class from archive if class of inline field is excluded [v9] Matias Saavedra Silva
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384756: [lworld] Exclude class from archive if class of inline field is excluded [v10] Matias Saavedra Silva
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384756: [lworld] Exclude class from archive if class of inline field is excluded [v11] Matias Saavedra Silva
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384756: [lworld] Exclude class from archive if class of inline field is excluded [v11] Frederic Parain
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384756: [lworld] Exclude class from archive if class of inline field is excluded [v11] Dan Heidinga
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8384756: [lworld] Exclude class from archive if class of inline field is excluded Matias Saavedra Silva
• [lworld] RFR: 8385331: [lworld] adjust ValueComparisonTest.java again to work around JDK-8370769 Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385331: [lworld] adjust ValueComparisonTest.java again to work around JDK-8370769 David Simms
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385331: [lworld] adjust ValueComparisonTest.java again to work around JDK-8370769 Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385331: [lworld] adjust ValueComparisonTest.java again to work around JDK-8370769 Daniel D . Daugherty
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8385331: [lworld] adjust ValueComparisonTest.java again to work around JDK-8370769 Daniel D . Daugherty
• [lworld] RFR: 8385311: [lworld] TypePtr::eq() should use accessor method for _offset Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385311: [lworld] TypePtr::eq() should use accessor method for _offset Marc Chevalier
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385311: [lworld] TypePtr::eq() should use accessor method for _offset Tobias Hartmann
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8385311: [lworld] TypePtr::eq() should use accessor method for _offset Tobias Hartmann

• Earlier messages
• Later messages