valhalla-dev  

Messages by Thread

• git: openjdk/valhalla: lworld: 8385469: [lworld] compiler/valhalla/inlinetypes/TestVirtualThreads.java#xcomp-co-test failed with invalid class initialization state for invoke_static Tobias Hartmann
• Re: [lworld] RFR: 8350515: [lworld] CheckedType replaced by NullRestricted ExE Boss
• git: openjdk/valhalla: lworld: 8385695: [lworld] Various small code cleanups Tobias Hartmann
• [lworld] RFR: 8385695: [lworld] Various small code cleanups Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385695: [lworld] Various small code cleanups Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385695: [lworld] Various small code cleanups [v2] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385695: [lworld] Various small code cleanups [v2] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385695: [lworld] Various small code cleanups [v2] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385695: [lworld] Various small code cleanups [v2] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385695: [lworld] Various small code cleanups [v2] Tobias Hartmann
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8385695: [lworld] Various small code cleanups Tobias Hartmann
• [lworld] RFR: 8384805: [lworld] assert(klass_is_exact()) under MemNode::optimize_simple_memory_chain Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384805: [lworld] assert(klass_is_exact()) under MemNode::optimize_simple_memory_chain Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384805: [lworld] assert(klass_is_exact()) under MemNode::optimize_simple_memory_chain [v2] Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384805: [lworld] assert(klass_is_exact()) under MemNode::optimize_simple_memory_chain [v2] Quan Anh Mai
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8384805: [lworld] assert(klass_is_exact()) under MemNode::optimize_simple_memory_chain Quan Anh Mai
• [lworld] RFR: 8382503: [lworld] compiler/c2/ReachabilityFenceFlagsTest.java fails post jdk-27+18 with preview enabled Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8382503: [lworld] compiler/c2/ReachabilityFenceFlagsTest.java fails post jdk-27+18 with preview enabled Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8382503: [lworld] compiler/c2/ReachabilityFenceFlagsTest.java fails post jdk-27+18 with preview enabled [v2] Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8382503: [lworld] compiler/c2/ReachabilityFenceFlagsTest.java fails post jdk-27+18 with preview enabled [v2] Dean Long
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8382503: [lworld] compiler/c2/ReachabilityFenceFlagsTest.java fails post jdk-27+18 with preview enabled [v2] Dean Long
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8382503: [lworld] compiler/c2/ReachabilityFenceFlagsTest.java fails post jdk-27+18 with preview enabled [v2] Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8382503: [lworld] compiler/c2/ReachabilityFenceFlagsTest.java fails post jdk-27+18 with preview enabled [v3] Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8382503: [lworld] compiler/c2/ReachabilityFenceFlagsTest.java fails post jdk-27+18 with preview enabled [v3] Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8382503: [lworld] compiler/c2/ReachabilityFenceFlagsTest.java fails post jdk-27+18 with preview enabled [v3] Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8382503: [lworld] compiler/c2/ReachabilityFenceFlagsTest.java fails post jdk-27+18 with preview enabled [v4] Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8382503: [lworld] compiler/c2/ReachabilityFenceFlagsTest.java fails post jdk-27+18 with preview enabled [v4] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8382503: [lworld] compiler/c2/ReachabilityFenceFlagsTest.java fails post jdk-27+18 with preview enabled [v4] Quan Anh Mai
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8382503: [lworld] compiler/c2/ReachabilityFenceFlagsTest.java fails post jdk-27+18 with preview enabled Quan Anh Mai
• [lworld] RFR: 8385673: [lworld] Redundant StoreStore membar in AArch64 TemplateTable::aaload Joel Sikström
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385673: [lworld] Redundant StoreStore membar in AArch64 TemplateTable::aaload Axel Boldt-Christmas
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385673: [lworld] Redundant StoreStore membar in AArch64 TemplateTable::aaload Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385673: [lworld] Redundant StoreStore membar in AArch64 TemplateTable::aaload Dan Heidinga
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385673: [lworld] Redundant StoreStore membar in AArch64 TemplateTable::aaload Frederic Parain
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8385673: [lworld] Redundant StoreStore membar in AArch64 TemplateTable::aaload Joel Sikström
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385673: [lworld] Redundant StoreStore membar in AArch64 TemplateTable::aaload Joel Sikström
• [lworld] Integrated: 8385674: [lworld] TestNullableInlineTypes.java fails after JDK-8325632 Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] Integrated: 8385674: [lworld] TestNullableInlineTypes.java fails after JDK-8325632 Marc Chevalier
  • Re: [lworld] Integrated: 8385674: [lworld] TestNullableInlineTypes.java fails after JDK-8325632 Tobias Hartmann
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8385674: [lworld] TestNullableInlineTypes.java fails after JDK-8325632 Tobias Hartmann
• [lworld] RFR: 8385645: [lworld] Javac is crashing while compiling constructor with early assigments Vicente Romero
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385645: [lworld] Javac is crashing while compiling constructor with early assigments Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385645: [lworld] Javac is crashing while compiling constructor with early assigments Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385645: [lworld] Javac is crashing while compiling constructor with early assigments [v2] Vicente Romero
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385645: [lworld] Javac is crashing while compiling constructor with early assigments [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385645: [lworld] Javac is crashing while compiling constructor with early assigments [v3] Vicente Romero
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8385645: [lworld] Javac is crashing while compiling constructor with early assigments Vicente Romero
• [lworld] RFR: 8385652: [lworld] RedefineClasses should use stack map frame name Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385652: [lworld] RedefineClasses should use stack map frame name Frederic Parain
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385652: [lworld] RedefineClasses should use stack map frame name Coleen Phillimore
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8385652: [lworld] RedefineClasses should use stack map frame name Coleen Phillimore
• git: openjdk/valhalla: lworld: 8385600: [lworld] DA/DU issues with strict fields Maurizio Cimadamore
• [lworld] RFR: 8385469: [lworld] compiler/valhalla/inlinetypes/TestVirtualThreads.java#xcomp-co-test failed with invalid class initialization state for invoke_static Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385469: [lworld] compiler/valhalla/inlinetypes/TestVirtualThreads.java#xcomp-co-test failed with invalid class initialization state for invoke_static Frederic Parain
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385469: [lworld] compiler/valhalla/inlinetypes/TestVirtualThreads.java#xcomp-co-test failed with invalid class initialization state for invoke_static Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385469: [lworld] compiler/valhalla/inlinetypes/TestVirtualThreads.java#xcomp-co-test failed with invalid class initialization state for invoke_static Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385469: [lworld] compiler/valhalla/inlinetypes/TestVirtualThreads.java#xcomp-co-test failed with invalid class initialization state for invoke_static duke
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8385469: [lworld] compiler/valhalla/inlinetypes/TestVirtualThreads.java#xcomp-co-test failed with invalid class initialization state for invoke_static Patricio Chilano Mateo
• [lworld] RFR: 8302217: [lworld] Infinite invocation of PhiNode::push_inline_types_through Roland Westrelin
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8302217: [lworld] Infinite invocation of PhiNode::push_inline_types_through Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8302217: [lworld] Infinite invocation of PhiNode::push_inline_types_through Roland Westrelin
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8302217: [lworld] Infinite invocation of PhiNode::push_inline_types_through Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8302217: [lworld] Infinite invocation of PhiNode::push_inline_types_through Roland Westrelin
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8302217: [lworld] Infinite invocation of PhiNode::push_inline_types_through Marc Chevalier
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8302217: [lworld] Infinite invocation of PhiNode::push_inline_types_through [v2] Roland Westrelin
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8302217: [lworld] Infinite invocation of PhiNode::push_inline_types_through [v2] Roland Westrelin
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8302217: [lworld] Infinite invocation of PhiNode::push_inline_types_through [v2] Tobias Hartmann
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8302217: [lworld] Infinite invocation of PhiNode::push_inline_types_through Roland Westrelin
• [lworld] RFR: 8385328: [lworld] C2: assert(phi->_idx >= nodes_size()) failed: only new Phi per instance memory slice still happens after JDK-8374742 Roland Westrelin
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385328: [lworld] C2: assert(phi->_idx >= nodes_size()) failed: only new Phi per instance memory slice still happens after JDK-8374742 Dean Long
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385328: [lworld] C2: assert(phi->_idx >= nodes_size()) failed: only new Phi per instance memory slice still happens after JDK-8374742 Roland Westrelin
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385328: [lworld] C2: assert(phi->_idx >= nodes_size()) failed: only new Phi per instance memory slice still happens after JDK-8374742 [v2] Dean Long
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385328: [lworld] C2: assert(phi->_idx >= nodes_size()) failed: only new Phi per instance memory slice still happens after JDK-8374742 Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385328: [lworld] C2: assert(phi->_idx >= nodes_size()) failed: only new Phi per instance memory slice still happens after JDK-8374742 [v2] Roland Westrelin
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385328: [lworld] C2: assert(phi->_idx >= nodes_size()) failed: only new Phi per instance memory slice still happens after JDK-8374742 [v2] Dean Long
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385328: [lworld] C2: assert(phi->_idx >= nodes_size()) failed: only new Phi per instance memory slice still happens after JDK-8374742 [v2] Roland Westrelin
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385328: [lworld] C2: assert(phi->_idx >= nodes_size()) failed: only new Phi per instance memory slice still happens after JDK-8374742 [v2] Dean Long
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385328: [lworld] C2: assert(phi->_idx >= nodes_size()) failed: only new Phi per instance memory slice still happens after JDK-8374742 [v2] Roland Westrelin
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385328: [lworld] C2: assert(phi->_idx >= nodes_size()) failed: only new Phi per instance memory slice still happens after JDK-8374742 [v2] Dean Long
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385328: [lworld] C2: assert(phi->_idx >= nodes_size()) failed: only new Phi per instance memory slice still happens after JDK-8374742 [v2] Roland Westrelin
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385328: [lworld] C2: assert(phi->_idx >= nodes_size()) failed: only new Phi per instance memory slice still happens after JDK-8374742 [v3] Roland Westrelin
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385328: [lworld] C2: assert(phi->_idx >= nodes_size()) failed: only new Phi per instance memory slice still happens after JDK-8374742 [v4] Roland Westrelin
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385328: [lworld] C2: assert(phi->_idx >= nodes_size()) failed: only new Phi per instance memory slice still happens after JDK-8374742 [v4] Dean Long
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385328: [lworld] C2: assert(phi->_idx >= nodes_size()) failed: only new Phi per instance memory slice still happens after JDK-8374742 [v5] Roland Westrelin
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385328: [lworld] C2: assert(phi->_idx >= nodes_size()) failed: only new Phi per instance memory slice still happens after JDK-8374742 [v5] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385328: [lworld] C2: assert(phi->_idx >= nodes_size()) failed: only new Phi per instance memory slice still happens after JDK-8374742 [v5] Roland Westrelin
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385328: [lworld] C2: assert(phi->_idx >= nodes_size()) failed: only new Phi per instance memory slice still happens after JDK-8374742 [v5] Roland Westrelin
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385328: [lworld] C2: assert(phi->_idx >= nodes_size()) failed: only new Phi per instance memory slice still happens after JDK-8374742 [v5] Roland Westrelin
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385328: [lworld] C2: assert(phi->_idx >= nodes_size()) failed: only new Phi per instance memory slice still happens after JDK-8374742 [v6] Roland Westrelin
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385328: [lworld] C2: assert(phi->_idx >= nodes_size()) failed: only new Phi per instance memory slice still happens after JDK-8374742 [v6] Roland Westrelin
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385328: [lworld] C2: assert(phi->_idx >= nodes_size()) failed: only new Phi per instance memory slice still happens after JDK-8374742 [v6] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385328: [lworld] C2: assert(phi->_idx >= nodes_size()) failed: only new Phi per instance memory slice still happens after JDK-8374742 [v6] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385328: [lworld] C2: assert(phi->_idx >= nodes_size()) failed: only new Phi per instance memory slice still happens after JDK-8374742 [v7] Roland Westrelin
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385328: [lworld] C2: assert(phi->_idx >= nodes_size()) failed: only new Phi per instance memory slice still happens after JDK-8374742 [v7] Dean Long
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385328: [lworld] C2: assert(phi->_idx >= nodes_size()) failed: only new Phi per instance memory slice still happens after JDK-8374742 [v7] Roland Westrelin
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385328: [lworld] C2: assert(phi->_idx >= nodes_size()) failed: only new Phi per instance memory slice still happens after JDK-8374742 [v8] Roland Westrelin
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385328: [lworld] C2: assert(phi->_idx >= nodes_size()) failed: only new Phi per instance memory slice still happens after JDK-8374742 [v8] Dean Long
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385328: [lworld] C2: assert(phi->_idx >= nodes_size()) failed: only new Phi per instance memory slice still happens after JDK-8374742 [v8] Dean Long
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385328: [lworld] C2: assert(phi->_idx >= nodes_size()) failed: only new Phi per instance memory slice still happens after JDK-8374742 [v8] Roland Westrelin
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385328: [lworld] C2: assert(phi->_idx >= nodes_size()) failed: only new Phi per instance memory slice still happens after JDK-8374742 [v8] Dean Long
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385328: [lworld] C2: assert(phi->_idx >= nodes_size()) failed: only new Phi per instance memory slice still happens after JDK-8374742 [v8] Roland Westrelin
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385328: [lworld] C2: assert(phi->_idx >= nodes_size()) failed: only new Phi per instance memory slice still happens after JDK-8374742 [v8] Dean Long
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385328: [lworld] C2: assert(phi->_idx >= nodes_size()) failed: only new Phi per instance memory slice still happens after JDK-8374742 [v9] Roland Westrelin
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385328: [lworld] C2: assert(phi->_idx >= nodes_size()) failed: only new Phi per instance memory slice still happens after JDK-8374742 [v9] Dean Long
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385328: [lworld] C2: assert(phi->_idx >= nodes_size()) failed: only new Phi per instance memory slice still happens after JDK-8374742 [v9] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385328: [lworld] C2: assert(phi->_idx >= nodes_size()) failed: only new Phi per instance memory slice still happens after JDK-8374742 [v9] Roland Westrelin
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385328: [lworld] C2: assert(phi->_idx >= nodes_size()) failed: only new Phi per instance memory slice still happens after JDK-8374742 [v10] Dean Long
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385328: [lworld] C2: assert(phi->_idx >= nodes_size()) failed: only new Phi per instance memory slice still happens after JDK-8374742 [v10] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385328: [lworld] C2: assert(phi->_idx >= nodes_size()) failed: only new Phi per instance memory slice still happens after JDK-8374742 [v11] Roland Westrelin
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385328: [lworld] C2: assert(phi->_idx >= nodes_size()) failed: only new Phi per instance memory slice still happens after JDK-8374742 [v11] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385328: [lworld] C2: assert(phi->_idx >= nodes_size()) failed: only new Phi per instance memory slice still happens after JDK-8374742 [v11] Dean Long
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385328: [lworld] C2: assert(phi->_idx >= nodes_size()) failed: only new Phi per instance memory slice still happens after JDK-8374742 [v11] Roland Westrelin
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385328: [lworld] C2: assert(phi->_idx >= nodes_size()) failed: only new Phi per instance memory slice still happens after JDK-8374742 [v11] Tobias Hartmann
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8385328: [lworld] C2: assert(phi->_idx >= nodes_size()) failed: only new Phi per instance memory slice still happens after JDK-8374742 Roland Westrelin
• [lworld] RFR: 8385634: [lworld] Remove unnecessary coupling between Lower, Gen and LocalProxyVarsGen Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385634: [lworld] Remove unnecessary coupling between Lower, Gen and LocalProxyVarsGen [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385634: [lworld] Remove unnecessary coupling between Lower, Gen and LocalProxyVarsGen [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385634: [lworld] Remove unnecessary coupling between Lower, Gen and LocalProxyVarsGen [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385634: [lworld] Remove unnecessary coupling between Lower, Gen and LocalProxyVarsGen Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385634: [lworld] Remove unnecessary coupling between Lower, Gen and LocalProxyVarsGen [v3] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385634: [lworld] Remove unnecessary coupling between Lower, Gen and LocalProxyVarsGen [v3] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385634: [lworld] Remove unnecessary coupling between Lower, Gen and LocalProxyVarsGen [v4] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385634: [lworld] Remove unnecessary coupling between Lower, Gen and LocalProxyVarsGen [v4] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385634: [lworld] Remove unnecessary coupling between Lower, Gen and LocalProxyVarsGen [v5] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385634: [lworld] Remove unnecessary coupling between Lower, Gen and LocalProxyVarsGen [v6] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385634: [lworld] Remove unnecessary coupling between Lower, Gen and LocalProxyVarsGen [v6] Vicente Romero
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8385634: [lworld] Remove unnecessary coupling between Lower, Gen and LocalProxyVarsGen Maurizio Cimadamore
• [lworld] RFR: 8385629: [lworld] UnsetFieldInfo should be replaced by bit sets in Code.State Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385629: [lworld] UnsetFieldInfo should be replaced by bit sets in Code.State Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385629: [lworld] UnsetFieldInfo should be replaced by bit sets in Code.State Vicente Romero
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385629: [lworld] UnsetFieldInfo should be replaced by bit sets in Code.State Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385629: [lworld] UnsetFieldInfo should be replaced by bit sets in Code.State Vicente Romero
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385629: [lworld] UnsetFieldInfo should be replaced by bit sets in Code.State Vicente Romero
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385629: [lworld] UnsetFieldInfo should be replaced by bit sets in Code.State [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8385629: [lworld] UnsetFieldInfo should be replaced by bit sets in Code.State Maurizio Cimadamore
• [lworld] RFR: 8385600: [lworld] DA/DU issues with strict fields Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385600: [lworld] DA/DU issues with strict fields Vicente Romero
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385600: [lworld] DA/DU issues with strict fields [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385600: [lworld] DA/DU issues with strict fields [v2] Vicente Romero
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8385600: [lworld] DA/DU issues with strict fields Maurizio Cimadamore
• [lworld] RFR: 8325632: [lworld] C2 compilation fails with "matching stack sizes" Christian Hagedorn
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8325632: [lworld] C2 compilation fails with "matching stack sizes" Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8325632: [lworld] C2 compilation fails with "matching stack sizes" Christian Hagedorn
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8325632: [lworld] C2 compilation fails with "matching stack sizes" Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8325632: [lworld] C2 compilation fails with "matching stack sizes" [v2] Christian Hagedorn
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8325632: [lworld] C2 compilation fails with "matching stack sizes" [v2] Christian Hagedorn
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8325632: [lworld] C2 compilation fails with "matching stack sizes" Christian Hagedorn
• [lworld] RFR: 8385601: [lworld] Update testing documentation for the ValueClassPlugin jtreg option Bill Huang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385601: [lworld] Update testing documentation for the ValueClassPlugin jtreg option Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385601: [lworld] Update testing documentation for the ValueClassPlugin jtreg option [v2] Bill Huang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385601: [lworld] Update testing documentation for the ValueClassPlugin jtreg option [v2] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385601: [lworld] Update testing documentation for the ValueClassPlugin jtreg option [v2] duke
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385601: [lworld] Update testing documentation for the ValueClassPlugin jtreg option [v2] Chen Liang
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8385601: [lworld] Update testing documentation for the ValueClassPlugin jtreg option Bill Huang
• [lworld] RFR: 8385569: [lworld] Apply JDK-8343767 to Valhalla specific StubRoutines Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385569: [lworld] Apply JDK-8343767 to Valhalla specific StubRoutines Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385569: [lworld] Apply JDK-8343767 to Valhalla specific StubRoutines Frederic Parain
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385569: [lworld] Apply JDK-8343767 to Valhalla specific StubRoutines Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385569: [lworld] Apply JDK-8343767 to Valhalla specific StubRoutines Coleen Phillimore
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8385569: [lworld] Apply JDK-8343767 to Valhalla specific StubRoutines Coleen Phillimore
• [lworld] RFR: 8385581: [lworld] Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Manuel Hässig
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385581: [lworld] Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385581: [lworld] Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385581: [lworld] Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385581: [lworld] Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Joel Sikström
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385581: [lworld] Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385581: [lworld] Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Manuel Hässig
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385581: [lworld] Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385581: [lworld] Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385581: [lworld] Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Manuel Hässig
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8385581: [lworld] Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Manuel Hässig
• [lworld] RFR: 8384897: [lworld] this.staticField should be restricted in early construction context Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384897: [lworld] this.staticField should be restricted in early construction context Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384897: [lworld] this.staticField should be restricted in early construction context [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384897: [lworld] this.staticField should be restricted in early construction context [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384897: [lworld] this.staticField should be restricted in early construction context [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384897: [lworld] this.staticField should be restricted in early construction context [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384897: [lworld] this.staticField should be restricted in early construction context [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384897: [lworld] this.staticField should be restricted in early construction context [v3] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384897: [lworld] this.staticField should be restricted in early construction context [v3] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384897: [lworld] this.staticField should be restricted in early construction context [v4] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384897: [lworld] this.staticField should be restricted in early construction context [v5] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384897: [lworld] this.staticField should be restricted in early construction context [v6] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8384897: [lworld] this.staticField should be restricted in early construction context [v6] Vicente Romero
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8384897: [lworld] this.staticField should be restricted in early construction context Maurizio Cimadamore
• [lworld] RFR: 8373598: [lworld] C2 asserts with "excessive live node increase in single iteration of IGVN" Marc Chevalier
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373598: [lworld] C2 asserts with "excessive live node increase in single iteration of IGVN" [v2] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373598: [lworld] C2 asserts with "excessive live node increase in single iteration of IGVN" [v2] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373598: [lworld] C2 asserts with "excessive live node increase in single iteration of IGVN" [v2] Marc Chevalier
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8373598: [lworld] C2 asserts with "excessive live node increase in single iteration of IGVN" Marc Chevalier
• [lworld] RFR: 8385553: [lworld] Clean up oops changes for review Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385553: [lworld] Clean up oops changes for review David Holmes
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385553: [lworld] Clean up oops changes for review Dean Long
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385553: [lworld] Clean up oops changes for review Dean Long
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385553: [lworld] Clean up oops changes for review Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385553: [lworld] Clean up oops changes for review [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385553: [lworld] Clean up oops changes for review [v3] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385553: [lworld] Clean up oops changes for review [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385553: [lworld] Clean up oops changes for review [v3] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8385553: [lworld] Clean up oops changes for review [v3] Stefan Karlsson

• Earlier messages
• Later messages