I just don't get it. I look in on vortex every now and then and have for many years. I must say I have never seen such an uproar over anything since the SMOT. Am I just shallow or does vortex need to be renamed to something like ..Vortex Legal.. Might better explain the group. So I guess I missed out on whatever has cause this silly concern over the definition of words. I was taught the English language like many others is ambiguous, so what, what about the science here?
DM (Don Masters) -----Original Message----- From: Horace Heffner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 4:31 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Part 8 "Cold" electricity On Oct 29, 2007, at 2:15 PM, DDMasters wrote: > Maybe you should read his web pages, he does say no generator is > used in his > #7 free standing unit. It is in plain English. Somehow I missed that. It indeed says there under the Fig. 14 title: "No localized external power source is used in the following two circuits. It is currently unknown how the circuit is being powered. Except for an earth ground connection, no other connections are made. The aluminum pan in which the circuit is sitting is floating and not connected to the earth ground or the circuit or circuit board." I guess I was wrong about no direct answers. That's about as direct as you can get, except maybe the intended definitions of "external power source" (external to what) and "connection" in this case. Horace Heffner http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
