Quantum Mechanics is not well developed in relation to the explanations that it can provide to explain all the vast array of weird things that seem to be occurring at and below the atomic level.
Once LENR is taken seriously, I expect it to be a gold mine for research into quantum weirdness in which LENR is so blessed. On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 10:34 PM, Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson < orionwo...@charter.net> wrote: > Axil, > > > > You seem to be implying that CQM is essentially religion. You also seem to > be implying that BLP is run by the equivalent of another L. Ron Hubbard. It > seems to me that one might be able to imply that the same thing has already > happened to how standard quantum mechanics seems to be both revered and > protected by some of its own cult members. Look at what Wikipedia has had > to say about BLP. > > > > I will grant you that I do see the beginnings of a cult following > gestating nicely over at the SCP. And that worries me. But I wouldn't pin > such idiocy at Dr. Mills foot. He strikes me as caring less about being > perceived as a cult leader. I think "the doctor" is far more interested in > vindicating his CQM theory. If one therefore wants to imply that CQM is Dr. > Mills true religion... yes I will not argue the finer points of that, but > only to a point. The last time I looked at Dr. Mills' "bible" ...My > goodness, I've never seen so many mathematical equations. Long protracted > equations. Hey! Where's all the "knowing" and all the "begetting" that > should be happening within the pages of a real bible. I see no sacrifices > nor any god fearing smoteing going on either. It's just a coincidence that > Dr. Mills might seem to bare a slight resemblance to Charlton Heston! > Actually, I think Dr. MIlls' text is rather dry. Quite boring if you ask me. > > > > Pin the folly of wanting to become a cult follower on the stupidity and > naivety of the individuals who simply want to become cult follower. > > > > Look, I realize I'm not an expert on most matters pertaining to quantum > physics. All I can say is that... well, let me put it this way: I find it > tantalizing that a theory that some on this discussion group seem to feel > is actually a religion attempting to be cloak its true nature under the > camouflage of a laboratory coat was nevertheless capable of predicting the > accelerated expansion of the universe before astronomy had proven this was > actually happening. I'm under the impression that standard quantum > mechanics, as it is currently understood, didn't seem have much to say on > the matter, for or against. > > > > Ok... I'm done for the night. Back to the beehive tomorrow. > > > > Regards, > > Steven Vincent Johnson > > svjart.orionworks.com > > zazzle.com/orionworks > > >
