[digitalradio] Re: Digitalradio Group

2008-01-16 Thread radionorway
Thanks Juergen , 100 % agree 73 de LA5VNA Steinar --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, dl8le [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Per definition the DIGITALRADIO GROUP is A meeting place for discussion of amateur radio digital modes, applications, software, hardware, equipment, and on

[digitalradio] New file uploaded to digitalradio

2008-01-16 Thread digitalradio
Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the digitalradio group. File: /psk31_tips.pdf Uploaded by : valuedprofile [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description : Tips on using PSK31 You can access this file at the URL:

[digitalradio] Feld-Hell Club Sprint: This weekend.

2008-01-16 Thread Andrew O'Brien
Feld-Hell Club Sprint Rules: Date: The third Saturday of every month, from 1500 - 1700Z Open to:Any licensed amateur and SWL participants Mode: Feld-Hell (any flavor) Bands: 160 through 10 meters. No WARC bands Power: Limited to 100 watts Exchange: Feld-Hell Club members send:

[digitalradio] K3UK JT65A HF Monitoring for past 24 hours.

2008-01-16 Thread Andrew O'Brien
K3UK JT65A HF Monitoring for past 24 hours. Looks like I missed South Africa on 40M again, Date/Time Band RX Call RX Grid TX Call TX Grid Sig dB 2008-01-16 05:46:00 40M K3UK FN02hk PY3ARZ GF38 -12 2008-01-16 05:33:00 40M K3UK FN02hk NN6RF CM87 -19 2008-01-16 05:10:00 40M K3UK FN02hk NN6RF

[digitalradio] Re: Continuing evolution of HF Ham radio communications:

2008-01-16 Thread Danny Douglas
Thank you and very well said. Danny Douglas N7DC ex WN5QMX ET2US WA5UKR ET3USA SV0WPP VS6DD N7DC/YV5 G5CTB All 2 years or more (except Novice) Pls QSL direct, buro, or LOTW preferred, I Do not use, but as a courtesy do upload to eQSL for those who do.

[digitalradio] Re: Digitalradio Group

2008-01-16 Thread Danny Douglas
H- OK When you do that, please discontinue me as a member of the group. The main reason I have remained a member is the free wheeling discussion of the subject of digitial radio. Is it not amazing that the major number of members who oppose the subject are outside the USA? I thought the

[digitalradio] Pactor Operations.....

2008-01-16 Thread Jack Chomley
Hi All, Pactor running from 2000z to 1900z on following freqs being scanned, Pactor I II connects accepted. Call is VK4JRC and mailbox is on while I am busy here at home. Dial Frequencies USB: 14.078, 14.079.5, 18.100, 18.105, 21.078, 21.093, 24.920, 24.925, 28.105, 28.110 The scan rate

[digitalradio] Re: Digitalradio Group

2008-01-16 Thread Danny Douglas
And who will go to that group? Probably only the ones being bothered with the interference! Those who are happy with WinLink, and its continuance will NOT. Why should they? If one gets what he wants, he isnt likely to go to an anti-subject group to get his daily dose of venem. The subject IS

[digitalradio] Pactor Operations.....

2008-01-16 Thread Jack Chomley
Hi All, Sorry, made a mess of the time in the last post. The system is on, from 1300z to 1200z. 73s Jack VK4JRC

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Digitalradio Group

2008-01-16 Thread Rick
If you can not discuss the most critical digital radio issues of the time on a given group, then they will migrate to some other group, often along with other things you might have wished have remained. These issues will not just go away by themselves and to actually want to prevent

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Digitalradio Group

2008-01-16 Thread Russell Blair
Very will put Rick, I would like to have the chorse to read the discuss and then I delete it, than to not have to right at all, we all have that right to read or not to read, with out a chorse it is over. Russell NC5O --- Rick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you can not discuss the most critical

[digitalradio] Re: Digitalradio Group

2008-01-16 Thread Demetre SV1UY
Hi all, Following this discussion I could help but notice the frontpage of this group. It mentions DIGITALRADIO GROUP International. -- DIGITALRADIO GROUP A meeting place for discussion of amateur radio digital modes,

[digitalradio] Re: New file uploaded to digitalradio

2008-01-16 Thread John Becker, WØJAB
File: /psk31_tips.pdf Uploaded by : valuedprofile [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description : Tips on using PSK31 Would someone like to step up and take credit for this? John, W0JAB

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Digitalradio Group

2008-01-16 Thread Rodney
I believe you're right! It was set up to be a VENT group. Don't think it ever really accomplished anything nor did it really get off the ground! Rod Chris Jewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rodney writes: Just did a Group search and it's there. It's called, FCCSUCKS, but there's

[digitalradio] Re: Digitalradio Group

2008-01-16 Thread dl8le
Rick, are you a politician? A standard rethoric trick of politicians is to phrase something as a statement which has not been made and then start to complain about that attitude ... I am not against a discussion about the most critical digital radio issues as you state it. I have a problem

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Digitalradio Group

2008-01-16 Thread Kevin O'Rorke
Demetre SV1UY wrote: Hi all, Following this discussion I could help but notice the frontpage of this group. It mentions DIGITALRADIO GROUP International. -- DIGITALRADIO GROUP A meeting place for discussion of amateur radio

[digitalradio] Re: Digitalradio Group

2008-01-16 Thread jgorman01
Rick, I agree with you completely. I wouldn't have researched the propnet group without hearing about it here. I see where they are operating probes as they call them below 10 meters. Not sure how legal that is. After watching their 30 meter beacons for a while and seeing them come up over

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Digitalradio Group

2008-01-16 Thread kh6ty
Obviously some folks have not learned how to skip over threads that do not interest them. Others I'm sure don't want to hear what they're doing may be incorrect. Sad. I hope it survives and does well but it of no interest to me. The way this is handled on QRP-L mailing list is simply to

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Digitalradio Group

2008-01-16 Thread Roger J. Buffington
Danny Douglas wrote: And who will go to that group? Probably only the ones being bothered with the interference! Those who are happy with WinLink, and its continuance will NOT. Why should they? If one gets what he wants, he isnt likely to go to an anti-subject group to get his daily dose

[digitalradio] Pactor Callsign???

2008-01-16 Thread Jack Chomley
Hi All, Someone has tried to call my system today, twice. Using MY callsign The connect crashed both times with errors and timeout.. Dial Frequencies USB: 14.078, 14.079.5, 18.100, 18.105, 21.078, 21.093, 24.920, 24.925, 28.105, 28.110 The scan rate is 3 seconds per frequency, and

[digitalradio] I, am a Pactor Robot............

2008-01-16 Thread Jack Chomley
The subject says it all. I run a Pactor mailbox, just like the Packet mailbox that I used to run, many years agojust like MOST of you did, back then too. I am just another Ham, TRYING to enjoy my hobby... 73s Jack VK4JRC

Re: [digitalradio] I, am a Pactor Robot............

2008-01-16 Thread Roger J. Buffington
Jack Chomley wrote: The subject says it all. I run a Pactor mailbox, just like the Packet mailbox that I used to run, many years agojust like MOST of you did, back then too. I am just another Ham, TRYING to enjoy my hobby... 73s Jack VK4JRC We understand, Jack. But please

Re: [digitalradio] I, am a Pactor Robot............

2008-01-16 Thread Jack Chomley
Jack Chomley wrote: The subject says it all. I run a Pactor mailbox, just like the Packet mailbox that I used to run, many years agojust like MOST of you did, back then too. I am just another Ham, TRYING to enjoy my hobby... 73s Jack VK4JRC At 11:06 AM 1/17/2008, Roger

Re: [digitalradio] I, am a Pactor Robot............

2008-01-16 Thread John Becker, WØJAB
So tell me (and others) how someone operating a mode with a waterfall display and seeing a signal (so be it a pactor signal) QRM that ongoing keyboard to keyboard QSO? It seems to be that *any* pactor signal is fair game for anyone that *only* knows that is a pactor signal to QRM it. John,

Re: [digitalradio] I, am a Pactor Robot............

2008-01-16 Thread Roger J. Buffington
John Becker, WØJAB wrote: So tell me (and others) how someone operating a mode with a waterfall display and seeing a signal (so be it a pactor signal) QRM that ongoing keyboard to keyboard QSO? It seems to be that *any* pactor signal is fair game for anyone that *only* knows that is a

[digitalradio] calling CQ

2008-01-16 Thread John Becker, WØJAB
Calling CQ 7077.7LSB Pactor one at this time. Looking for W6VZV and QRZ DX

Re: [digitalradio] test ignore

2008-01-16 Thread John Becker, WØJAB
At 08:42 PM 1/16/2008, you wrote: test got it...

Re: [digitalradio] test ignore

2008-01-16 Thread John Becker, WØJAB
ignored

[digitalradio] Re: I, am a Pactor Robot............

2008-01-16 Thread Danny Douglas
Jack. We on the other side see THAT as exactly the problem. Your mailbox sits there silent. Somone else gets on the freq and calls it. It comes up - and causes interference to someone else that is already using the freq (which you would have heard if you were physically sitting there

[digitalradio] Re: I, am a Pactor Robot............

2008-01-16 Thread Bill McLaughlin
Hello John, Well I have seen no others, aside from you, complaining about qrm when operating Pactor modes on the sole basis that you were using Pactor. I am sure it happens as we all get benign qrm. As I have posted often, it is sad some think Pactor modes are the issue when it is the Winlink

Re: [digitalradio] Re: I, am a Pactor Robot............

2008-01-16 Thread John Becker, WØJAB
No Bill and you will not see others on this list. 99.5% are sound card *ONLY* operators and have no clue what the non sound cards modes are all about. Other then what they have read, such as it's all bad and that is why pactor has such a bad name. Not all of us pactor operators are robots stations

Re: [digitalradio] Re: I, am a Pactor Robot............

2008-01-16 Thread w6ids
Hey, Bill, NO, John isn't alone in the experience. It happens frequently enough as to catch the attention. Is it simply because the PACTOR mode is being used? I dunno, but it does happen with enough frequency to raise the ear brows. This is especially so when the signal is quite strong.

Re: [digitalradio] calling CQ

2008-01-16 Thread w6ids
Hey John, Been listening, John. Didn't hear a peep from out your way. I was copying some 5s and 7s on PSK on 7.070 area, perhaps it's simply the propogation beast that's at fault. Howard W6IDS Richmond, IN - Original Message - From: John Becker, WØJAB [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:

Re: [digitalradio] Re: I, am a Pactor Robot............

2008-01-16 Thread w6ids
Hi Danny, I replied up here 'cause I wasn't sure what I was going to snip out from your message, yet. Why not apply the rationale to transmitters in general? YOU can't transmit for your thrice-weekly sked because your station detects VERY nearby signals and will not transmit...until the

Re: [digitalradio] Re: I, am a Pactor Robot............

2008-01-16 Thread Jack Chomley
At 01:14 PM 1/17/2008, Danny wrote: Jack. We on the other side see THAT as exactly the problem. Your mailbox sits there silent. Somone else gets on the freq and calls it. It comes up - and causes interference to someone else that is already using the freq (which you would have heard if you were