On 9/18/07, Gilad Ben-Yossef [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Amit Aronovitch wrote:
Note that (some? most new ones?) of these laptops come with Home
versions of windows Vista on a recovery partition.
This is bundled (cannot be bought without), and cannot be upgraded to
a different license.
just fyi
not all core-2 due processors have a vt extension
i have a hp pavilion dv2xxx
it has core-2 due processor (T5300), support 64 bit
but doesn't have a vt extension ...
erez.
On 9/18/07, Gilad Ben-Yossef [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can para-virtualize 3d acceleration but at this time this is more
academic then useful, so yes, turning off the 3D (or any visual effects
for that matter) produces a great performance boost.
3D virtualization is already available in
Ilya Konstantinov wrote:
On 9/18/07, *Gilad Ben-Yossef* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can para-virtualize 3d acceleration but at this time this is more
academic then useful, so yes, turning off the 3D (or any visual effects
for that matter) produces a great
Note that (some? most new ones?) of these laptops come with Home
versions of windows Vista on a recovery partition.
This is bundled (cannot be bought without), and cannot be upgraded to
a different license.
By EULA, *you are not allowed* to use this (or any other Home)
version with virtualization
Amit Aronovitch wrote:
Note that (some? most new ones?) of these laptops come with Home
versions of windows Vista on a recovery partition.
This is bundled (cannot be bought without), and cannot be upgraded to
a different license.
By EULA, *you are not allowed* to use this (or any other Home)
On 08/07/2007, Eran Sandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
I haven't been active lately on the mailing list but I am watching it.
I have a question regarding virtualization software on Linux.
I plan on getting a new laptop. Unfortunately I still need access to Windows
for some
Hey guys,
linux-vserver is a pretty sweet implementation, as it introduces
virtually no latency since the vserver runs in a hacked up version of
chroot().
There are however some limitations with that approach. Security-wise,
it gives the attackers access to (almost) the whole range of
Hi,
I'm running Xen using Intel's Conroe which is an alias for the dual
core CPU with VT enabled, on my PC I don't know if there is any laptop
with it and how expensive is it.
I'm using openSUSE 10.2 as my distro which has an O.K. user interface
for the installation
and a good documentation.
Eran Sandler wrote:
I prefer Linux but if the performance is worse than what I will get with
comparable hardware on Mac + Parallels I'll go with a Mac.
Get a laptop with CoreDuo CPU with Intel VT-x and run Linux + kvm.
XP/200 or Vista run fine (enough memory provided).
Gilad
Thanks for the info.
The one thing I'm worried about is Visual Studio 2005 which is quite heavy.
If that will work well on a KVMed environment that would be more than fine
for me :-)
On 7/11/07, Gilad Ben-Yossef [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eran Sandler wrote:
I prefer Linux but if the
Hi,
I have KVM working on an AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 3800+
Runs Windows XP Ubuntu and Gentoo as Guests. As long as I do not go to
a kernel above 2.6.16 in the Linux guests. Getting the networking to
work with a bridge was kind of tricky but now its OK.
Performance is very good
: Hetz Ben Hamo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2007 3:27 PM
To: Eran Sandler
Cc: linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Virtualization software on Linux
Hi,
I didn't understand, you're planning to buy a Mac book or Mac book
pro? or Dell/Lenovo/HP/Acer/Asus etc.. laptop
On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 08:40:08AM +0300, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 08:15:14AM +0300, Eran Sandler wrote:
Qemu
Qemu is much to slow for running Windows under Linux. It's a great product
if you need a vitrual X86 processor, for example, I did some software
On 09/07/07, Dan Kenigsberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
occasional VisualDev. I guess that with modern systems which have the vt
cpu
extension, kvm+qemu would be a free, open, and competitive choice.
That's what my hunch also tells me (based on not much of personal experience
but generally
I ran WindowsXP/Centos/Solaris etc. in VMWare for a long time on an amd64
host. It worked fine with the exception of USB device support (scanner,
camera etc). It did have a lot of resource overhead though. I kept a dual
boot windows partition around for certain hardware that didn't work well
* Amos Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070709 11:13]:
On 09/07/07, Dan Kenigsberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
occasional VisualDev. I guess that with modern systems which have the vt
cpu
extension, kvm+qemu would be a free, open, and competitive choice.
That's what my hunch also tells me (based
* Chaim Keren Tzion [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070709 11:36]:
On Monday 09 July 2007 08:32:03 Amos Shapira wrote:
To give context for my question - I've just bought a Dell desktop based on
Intel Core 2 Duo and installed Debian Etch (amd64) on it,
A bit off topic but why try to install amd64 on an
On 09/07/07, Chaim Keren Tzion [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you are going to do other, linux, virtualization, I would like to
recommend
vserver. I have a P4 dev machine with 1GB RAM and I run 7 virtual machines
on
it simultaneously, 24/7. It runs a debian host and debian and centos
clients.
(On
On 09/07/07, Baruch Even [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you want nice guis and the like VMware is probably the way. If you
are willing to run a script then it should be as easy as:
sudo apt-get install kvm module-assistant kvm-source qemu
sudo m-a auto-install kvm
qemu-img -f qcow2 disk.img 10G
* Amos Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070709 11:56]:
On 09/07/07, Baruch Even [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you want nice guis and the like VMware is probably the way. If you
are willing to run a script then it should be as easy as:
sudo apt-get install kvm module-assistant kvm-source qemu
sudo
Hello all,
I haven't been active lately on the mailing list but I am watching it.
I have a question regarding virtualization software on Linux.
I plan on getting a new laptop. Unfortunately I still need access to Windows
for some development purposes and I need to know the performance
of your new processor.
Thanks,
Hetz
On 7/8/07, Eran Sandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
I haven't been active lately on the mailing list but I am watching it.
I have a question regarding virtualization software on Linux.
I plan on getting a new laptop. Unfortunately I still need
; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Virtualization software on Linux
Hi,
I didn't understand, you're planning to buy a Mac book or Mac book
pro? or Dell/Lenovo/HP/Acer/Asus etc.. laptop?
Parallels or VMWare Fusion (both for Mac) use the virtualized
extensions of the processor (if I recall correctly, all
Eran Sandler wrote:
1) Thinkpad T61 running Ubuntu and VmWare 5 with XP + Visual Studio 2005 +
MSSQL + IIS
2) Macbook Pro (similar specs to the T61) running MacOSX + Parallels and a
virtual machine with the same configuration.
I prefer Linux but if the performance is worse than what I will
T61 with 1440x960 resolution with an nVidia card and 2gigs of RAM costs
about the same as the 2.2Ghz MBP, so price wise that's not the issue here.
I wish there was some specific measurement that was done on a MBP running
Linux + VmWare (with bootcamp) as opposed to Parallels on MacOS X. :-)
On
Thanks for the info. I'll take that into consideration as well.
But my primary goal is to have a Windows free Host and hopefully keep
Windows only as a Guest OS with (hopefully) good enough performance.
Eran
On 7/8/07, Bilbo Bugginz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/8/07, Shachar Shemesh [EMAIL
On 08/07/07, Eran Sandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course I would rather have a laptop running Ubuntu or some other Linux
variant and have a virtualization software such as VmWare (or something else
that is really fast) running instead of using Mac, but I would do anything
in my power to
Amos, there are a couple of other contenders that are similar to VmWare.
Parallels also has a Linux version.
VirtualBox - which was even GPLed a while back
Qemu
I haven't tested VirtualBox yet but Parallels and VmWare are the ones with
the best performance (at least that I know of).
Eran
On
On 09/07/07, Eran Sandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Amos, there are a couple of other contenders that are similar to VmWare.
Parallels also has a Linux version.
VirtualBox - which was even GPLed a while back
Qemu
I haven't tested VirtualBox yet but Parallels and VmWare are the ones with
the
On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 08:15:14AM +0300, Eran Sandler wrote:
Qemu
Qemu is much to slow for running Windows under Linux. It's a great product
if you need a vitrual X86 processor, for example, I did some software
development for a handheld device using it. It also runs DOS programs
quite well if
31 matches
Mail list logo
