All bit sychronous systems carry clocks that are recovered on the other
side unless you deal in seperately distributed clocking.

So on average consumer TOSLINK, sure, there is a bit of slip
potentially, if you have clock drift, and if you don't attend to that
issue in your circuit design. But clock recovery is also well
understood and easily incorporated for equipment that cares (and at
audiophile prices it sure better care).

But clock distribution architecture is not a distinguisher to coax vs.
optical. 

It may be an arguement potentially for not using S/PDIF (coax or
optical) without a seperate clocking system. But now we just shifted
the discussion to BER and audibility of that, which I was not speaking
to. I was addressing the question of whether optical is inferior to
coax by default.


-- 
Eric Carroll

Transporter-Bryston 3B SST-Paradigm Reference Studio 60 v.4
SB3-Rotel RB890-B&W Matrix 805
SB3-Pioneer VSX-49TXi-Mirage OM7+C2+R2
ReadyNAS NV+
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric Carroll's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9293
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=33146

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to