Again, this is not related to AToM :-)
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 1:14 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > ** > The only thing I can think of problems connected to the STP with > mismatching vlans in VLAN CONNECT MODE. > If I am not mistake there are 2 kind of VC type: port-mode or VLAN-mode > for Ethernet L2VPNs. > A PortMode will replicate all Ethernet frames received, including all > tagged frames. > Perhaps in port mode we have not the problem about mismatching vlan > > In VLAN-based mode we will have xconnect statement will be under a > sub-interface > with own encapsulation and VLAN number specified. > This mode will just forward the own VLAN frames through pseudowire. > > However I think to replicate this problem. > > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013, at 10:04 PM, Marko Milivojevic wrote: > > Sure, but that will open the network for the loops. > > Try to focus on what the problem is, not how to get rid of the symptom :-) > > -- > Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S) > Senior CCIE Instructor / Managing Partner - IPexpert > > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 1:02 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > ** > There are other solution for example vlan filter, also L2 protocol tunnel > which erase local bpdu processing. > > > > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013, at 09:57 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > I am thinking we filtering bpdu to stop bpdu from blocking inconsistent > vlan,bpdu filtering is acceptable for me. > > What did you think? > > > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013, at 08:17 PM, Marko Milivojevic wrote: > > You're getting close. > > > Respond to the list, please, as it may be interesting for the others to > see, as well. > > -- > Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S) > Senior CCIE Instructor / Managing Partner - IPexpert > > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 11:16 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > ** > In fact I did not think it is related to l2vpn, althhough I do not know > different vlan to VC however I am thinking is related config to port or > mode spanning tree, > I will check conifguration to end point port: if 802.1q to two side and > native vlans, or model of stp EEE 802.1D and pvst+ > > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013, at 07:32 PM, Marko Milivojevic wrote: > > That is all very correct, but that's not the cause of the error. You *can* > have different VLAN IDs on two ends of the VC, but then you need to make > sure something else is done. Something that causes this problem. > > Btw. it's not related to L2VPNs :-) > > -- > Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S) > Senior CCIE Instructor / Managing Partner - IPexpert > > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:45 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > Point-to-Point L2 VPNs L2 connectivity to the attached, that make > circuits of two separate sites connected across a packet network > Furthemore It provide connectivity transparent without need L2 > connection acrosss SP core > > In the speficic: > > The VC identifiers at each end must match, so that the connection is > uniquely > addressed and MTU settings for the interfaces would have the same > > In mpls the topmost label is the transport label for the > other end's 1321P address and the second label identifies the remote AC > > Your error usually mean you receveid bpdu tagged with vlan id that > does't match vlan id where bpdu was receveid > In the meantime make sure native vlan is consistent on both ends of a > 802.1Q trunk and your vtp switches setup like VTP mode and domain names > > I hope it help you. > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013, at 06:00 PM, Marko Milivojevic wrote: > > Without straight-out giving you an answer (tell me if you want that), > > let's > > try to understand the problem first… > > > > What do you think is causing this inconsistency? > > > > -- > > Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S) > > Senior CCIE Instructor / Managing Partner - IPexpert > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Saleh Batouq <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > WB3-Lab9 > > > -------- > > > Task: L2VPN > > > ------ > > > > > > > > > I am running this on GNS, I have the AToM properly configured and > > > functional. > > > > > > BUT I get Inconsistency messege on Cat1 & Cat3 > > > > > > Any suggestion on over-riding this inconsistency? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The following are the outputs of show commands: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On R2 > > > ----- > > > > > > R2#sh mpls l2transport vc > > > > > > Local intf Local circuit Dest address VC ID > Status > > > ------------- -------------------------- --------------- ---------- > > > ---------- > > > Fa0/0.211 Eth VLAN 211 70.18.115.5 25 > UP > > > > > > > > > On R5 > > > ------ > > > > > > R5#sh mpls l2transport vc > > > > > > Local intf Local circuit Dest address VC ID > Status > > > ------------- -------------------------- --------------- ---------- > > > ---------- > > > Fa0/1.52 Eth VLAN 52 70.18.115.2 25 > UP > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > BUT I get Inconsistency messege on Cat1 & Cat3 > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > On Cat1 > > > ------- > > > > > > Cat1(config)# PVST+:Inconsistency timer expired. inconsistency 2 > > > cleared for FastEthernet1/2 > > > > > > *Mar 1 01:44:56.119: %SPANTREE-2-RECV_PVID_ERR: Received BPDU with > > > inconsistent peer vlan id 52 on FastEthernet1/2 VLAN211. > > > *Mar 1 01:44:56.119: %SPANTREE-2-BLOCK_PVID_LOCAL: Blocking > > > FastEthernet1/2 on VLAN211. Inconsistent local vlan. > > > > > > > > > > > > Cat1#sh spanning-tree inconsistentports > > > > > > Name Interface Inconsistency > > > -------------------- -------------------- ------------------ > > > VLAN211 FastEthernet1/2 Port VLAN ID Mismatch > > > > > > Number of inconsistent ports (segments) in the system : 1 > > > > > > On Cat3 > > > ------- > > > > > > [OK] > > > Cat3# > > > *Mar 1 01:44:49.487: %SPANTREE-2-RECV_PVID_ERR: Received BPDU with > > > inconsistent peer vlan id 211 on FastEthernet1/5 VLAN52. > > > *Mar 1 01:44:49.487: %SPANTREE-2-BLOCK_PVID_LOCAL: Blocking > > > FastEthernet1/5 on VLAN52. Inconsistent local vlan. > > > > > > > > > Cat3#sh spanning-tree inconsistentports > > > > > > Name Interface Inconsistency > > > -------------------- -------------------- ------------------ > > > VLAN52 FastEthernet1/5 Port VLAN ID Mismatch > > > > > > Number of inconsistent ports (segments) in the system : 1 > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > > > Saleh Hassan Batouq > > > [email protected] > > > _______________________________________________ > > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, > please > > > visit www.ipexpert.com > > > > > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > > > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > > > > > > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, > please > > visit www.ipexpert.com > > > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > > > > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > > > -- > This message is intended for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed > and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. > If you are not the addressee you must not read,use or disclose the > contents of this email. > Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the transmission of > viruses, the recipient should carry out virus and other checks, > as they consider appropriate. > Myself accepts no responsibility in this regard. > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > > > > > -- > This message is intended for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed and > may contain information that is privileged or confidential. > If you are not the addressee you must not read,use or disclose the > contents of this email. > Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the transmission of > viruses, the recipient should carry out virus and other checks, > as they consider appropriate. > Myself accepts no responsibility in this regard. > > > > > > > -- > This message is intended for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed and > may contain information that is privileged or confidential. > If you are not the addressee you must not read,use or disclose the > contents of this email. > Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the transmission of > viruses, the recipient should carry out virus and other checks, > as they consider appropriate. > Myself accepts no responsibility in this regard. > > > > > -- > This message is intended for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed and > may contain information that is privileged or confidential. > If you are not the addressee you must not read,use or disclose the > contents of this email. > Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the transmission of > viruses, the recipient should carry out virus and other checks, > as they consider appropriate. > Myself accepts no responsibility in this regard. > > > > > > > -- > This message is intended for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed and > may contain information that is privileged or confidential. > If you are not the addressee you must not read,use or disclose the > contents of this email. > Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the transmission of > viruses, the recipient should carry out virus and other checks, > as they consider appropriate. > Myself accepts no responsibility in this regard. > > > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
