LOL...  Marko, your so terrible .

Regards,
 Joe Sanchez

( please excuse the brevity of this email as it was sent via a mobile device.  
Please excuse misspelled words or sentence structure.) 

On Oct 1, 2013, at 4:52 PM, Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]> wrote:

> Nope, my questions still remain unanswered :-)
> 
> 
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 3:01 AM, Saleh Batouq <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Have we reached to a conclusion or a final fix for this issue. Marko, can
>> you please simply tell us more.
>> On Sep 4, 2013 1:08 AM, "Marko Milivojevic" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Again, this is not related to AToM :-)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 1:14 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> **
>>> 
>>>> The only thing I can think of problems connected to the STP with
>>>> mismatching vlans in VLAN CONNECT MODE.
>>>> If I am not mistake there are 2 kind of VC type:  port-mode or VLAN-mode
>>>> for Ethernet L2VPNs.
>>>> A PortMode  will replicate all Ethernet frames received, including all
>>>> tagged frames.
>>>> Perhaps in port mode we have not the problem about mismatching vlan
>>>> 
>>>> In VLAN-based mode  we will have xconnect statement will be under a
>>>> sub-interface
>>>> with own encapsulation and VLAN number specified.
>>>> This mode will just forward the own VLAN frames through pseudowire.
>>>> 
>>>> However I think to replicate this problem.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013, at 10:04 PM, Marko Milivojevic wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Sure, but that will open the network for the loops.
>>>> 
>>>> Try to focus on what the problem is, not how to get rid of the symptom
>>> :-)
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S)
>>>> Senior CCIE Instructor / Managing Partner - IPexpert
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 1:02 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> **
>>> 
>>>> There are other solution for example vlan filter, also L2 protocol
>>> tunnel
>>>> which erase local bpdu processing.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013, at 09:57 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> I am thinking we filtering bpdu to stop bpdu from blocking inconsistent
>>>> vlan,bpdu filtering is acceptable for me.
>>>> 
>>>> What did you think?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013, at 08:17 PM, Marko Milivojevic wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> You're getting close.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Respond to the list, please, as it may be interesting for the others to
>>>> see, as well.
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S)
>>>> Senior CCIE Instructor / Managing Partner - IPexpert
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 11:16 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> **
>>> 
>>>> In fact I did not think it is related to l2vpn, althhough I  do not know
>>>> different vlan to VC however I am thinking is related config to port or
>>>> mode spanning tree,
>>>> I will check conifguration to end point port: if 802.1q to two side and
>>>> native vlans, or model of stp EEE 802.1D and pvst+
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013, at 07:32 PM, Marko Milivojevic wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> That is all very correct, but that's not the cause of the error. You
>>> *can*
>>>> have different VLAN IDs on two ends of the VC, but then you need to make
>>>> sure something else is done. Something that causes this problem.
>>>> 
>>>> Btw. it's not related to L2VPNs :-)
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S)
>>>> Senior CCIE Instructor / Managing Partner - IPexpert
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:45 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Point-to-Point L2 VPNs L2 connectivity to the attached, that make
>>>> circuits of two separate sites connected across a packet network
>>>> Furthemore It provide connectivity transparent without need L2
>>>> connection acrosss SP core
>>>> 
>>>> In the speficic:
>>>> 
>>>> The VC identifiers at each end must match, so that the connection is
>>>> uniquely
>>>> addressed and MTU settings for the interfaces would have the same
>>>> 
>>>> In mpls the topmost label is the transport label for the
>>>> other end's 1321P address and the second label identifies the remote AC
>>>> 
>>>> Your error usually mean you receveid bpdu tagged with vlan id that
>>>> does't match vlan id where bpdu was receveid
>>>> In the meantime make sure native vlan is consistent on both ends of a
>>>> 802.1Q trunk and your vtp switches setup  like VTP mode and domain
>>> names
>>>> 
>>>> I hope it help you.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013, at 06:00 PM, Marko Milivojevic wrote:
>>>>> Without straight-out giving you an answer (tell me if you want that),
>>>>> let's
>>>>> try to understand the problem first…
>>>>> 
>>>>> What do you think is causing this inconsistency?
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S)
>>>>> Senior CCIE Instructor / Managing Partner - IPexpert
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Saleh Batouq <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> WB3-Lab9
>>>>>> --------
>>>>>> Task: L2VPN
>>>>>> ------
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I am running this on GNS, I have the AToM properly configured and
>>>>>> functional.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> BUT I get Inconsistency messege on Cat1 & Cat3
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Any suggestion on over-riding this inconsistency?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The following are the outputs of show commands:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On R2
>>>>>> -----
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> R2#sh mpls l2transport vc
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Local intf     Local circuit              Dest address    VC ID
>>>> Status
>>>>>> -------------  -------------------------- ---------------
>>> ----------
>>>>>> ----------
>>>>>> Fa0/0.211      Eth VLAN 211               70.18.115.5     25
>>>> UP
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On R5
>>>>>> ------
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> R5#sh mpls l2transport vc
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Local intf     Local circuit              Dest address    VC ID
>>>> Status
>>>>>> -------------  -------------------------- ---------------
>>> ----------
>>>>>> ----------
>>>>>> Fa0/1.52       Eth VLAN 52                70.18.115.2     25
>>>> UP
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> BUT I get Inconsistency messege on Cat1 & Cat3
>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Cat1
>>>>>> -------
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Cat1(config)# PVST+:Inconsistency timer expired. inconsistency 2
>>>>>>                 cleared for FastEthernet1/2
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> *Mar  1 01:44:56.119: %SPANTREE-2-RECV_PVID_ERR: Received BPDU with
>>>>>> inconsistent peer vlan id 52 on FastEthernet1/2 VLAN211.
>>>>>> *Mar  1 01:44:56.119: %SPANTREE-2-BLOCK_PVID_LOCAL: Blocking
>>>>>> FastEthernet1/2 on VLAN211. Inconsistent local vlan.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Cat1#sh spanning-tree inconsistentports
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Name                 Interface            Inconsistency
>>>>>> -------------------- -------------------- ------------------
>>>>>> VLAN211              FastEthernet1/2      Port VLAN ID Mismatch
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Number of inconsistent ports (segments) in the system : 1
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Cat3
>>>>>> -------
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> [OK]
>>>>>> Cat3#
>>>>>> *Mar  1 01:44:49.487: %SPANTREE-2-RECV_PVID_ERR: Received BPDU with
>>>>>> inconsistent peer vlan id 211 on FastEthernet1/5 VLAN52.
>>>>>> *Mar  1 01:44:49.487: %SPANTREE-2-BLOCK_PVID_LOCAL: Blocking
>>>>>> FastEthernet1/5 on VLAN52. Inconsistent local vlan.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Cat3#sh spanning-tree inconsistentports
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Name                 Interface            Inconsistency
>>>>>> -------------------- -------------------- ------------------
>>>>>> VLAN52               FastEthernet1/5      Port VLAN ID Mismatch
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Number of inconsistent ports (segments) in the system : 1
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Saleh Hassan Batouq
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>>>> please
>>>>>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>>>>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>>>> please
>>>>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>>>> 
>>>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>>>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> This message is intended for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed
>>>> and may contain information that is privileged or confidential.
>>>> If you are not the addressee you must not read,use or disclose the
>>>> contents of this email.
>>>> Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the transmission of
>>>> viruses, the recipient should carry out virus and other checks,
>>>> as they consider appropriate.
>>>> Myself accepts no responsibility in this regard.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>>> please
>>>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>>> 
>>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>>>> 
>>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> This message is intended for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed
>>> and
>>>> may contain information that is privileged or confidential.
>>>> If you are not the addressee you must not read,use or disclose the
>>>> contents of this email.
>>>> Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the transmission of
>>>> viruses, the recipient should carry out virus and other checks,
>>>> as they consider appropriate.
>>>> Myself accepts no responsibility in this regard.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> This message is intended for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed
>>> and
>>>> may contain information that is privileged or confidential.
>>>> If you are not the addressee you must not read,use or disclose the
>>>> contents of this email.
>>>> Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the transmission of
>>>> viruses, the recipient should carry out virus and other checks,
>>>> as they consider appropriate.
>>>> Myself accepts no responsibility in this regard.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> This message is intended for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed
>>> and
>>>> may contain information that is privileged or confidential.
>>>> If you are not the addressee you must not read,use or disclose the
>>>> contents of this email.
>>>> Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the transmission of
>>>> viruses, the recipient should carry out virus and other checks,
>>>> as they consider appropriate.
>>>> Myself accepts no responsibility in this regard.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> This message is intended for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed
>>> and
>>>> may contain information that is privileged or confidential.
>>>> If you are not the addressee you must not read,use or disclose the
>>>> contents of this email.
>>>> Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the transmission of
>>>> viruses, the recipient should carry out virus and other checks,
>>>> as they consider appropriate.
>>>> Myself accepts no responsibility in this regard.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>> 
>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>>> 
>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
> 
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
> 
> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs

Reply via email to