Nope, my questions still remain unanswered :-)

On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 3:01 AM, Saleh Batouq <[email protected]> wrote:

> Have we reached to a conclusion or a final fix for this issue. Marko, can
> you please simply tell us more.
> On Sep 4, 2013 1:08 AM, "Marko Milivojevic" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>  Again, this is not related to AToM :-)
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 1:14 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > **
>>
>> > The only thing I can think of problems connected to the STP with
>> > mismatching vlans in VLAN CONNECT MODE.
>> > If I am not mistake there are 2 kind of VC type:  port-mode or VLAN-mode
>> > for Ethernet L2VPNs.
>> > A PortMode  will replicate all Ethernet frames received, including all
>> > tagged frames.
>> > Perhaps in port mode we have not the problem about mismatching vlan
>> >
>> > In VLAN-based mode  we will have xconnect statement will be under a
>> > sub-interface
>> > with own encapsulation and VLAN number specified.
>> > This mode will just forward the own VLAN frames through pseudowire.
>> >
>> > However I think to replicate this problem.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013, at 10:04 PM, Marko Milivojevic wrote:
>> >
>> > Sure, but that will open the network for the loops.
>> >
>> > Try to focus on what the problem is, not how to get rid of the symptom
>> :-)
>> >
>> > --
>> > Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S)
>> > Senior CCIE Instructor / Managing Partner - IPexpert
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 1:02 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > **
>>
>> > There are other solution for example vlan filter, also L2 protocol
>> tunnel
>> > which erase local bpdu processing.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013, at 09:57 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>> >
>> > I am thinking we filtering bpdu to stop bpdu from blocking inconsistent
>> > vlan,bpdu filtering is acceptable for me.
>> >
>> > What did you think?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013, at 08:17 PM, Marko Milivojevic wrote:
>> >
>> > You're getting close.
>> >
>> >
>> > Respond to the list, please, as it may be interesting for the others to
>> > see, as well.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S)
>> > Senior CCIE Instructor / Managing Partner - IPexpert
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 11:16 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > **
>>
>> > In fact I did not think it is related to l2vpn, althhough I  do not know
>> > different vlan to VC however I am thinking is related config to port or
>> > mode spanning tree,
>> > I will check conifguration to end point port: if 802.1q to two side and
>> > native vlans, or model of stp EEE 802.1D and pvst+
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013, at 07:32 PM, Marko Milivojevic wrote:
>> >
>> > That is all very correct, but that's not the cause of the error. You
>> *can*
>> > have different VLAN IDs on two ends of the VC, but then you need to make
>> > sure something else is done. Something that causes this problem.
>> >
>> > Btw. it's not related to L2VPNs :-)
>> >
>> > --
>> > Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S)
>> > Senior CCIE Instructor / Managing Partner - IPexpert
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:45 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > Point-to-Point L2 VPNs L2 connectivity to the attached, that make
>> >  circuits of two separate sites connected across a packet network
>> >  Furthemore It provide connectivity transparent without need L2
>> >  connection acrosss SP core
>> >
>> >  In the speficic:
>> >
>> >  The VC identifiers at each end must match, so that the connection is
>> >  uniquely
>> >  addressed and MTU settings for the interfaces would have the same
>> >
>> >  In mpls the topmost label is the transport label for the
>> >  other end's 1321P address and the second label identifies the remote AC
>> >
>> >  Your error usually mean you receveid bpdu tagged with vlan id that
>> >  does't match vlan id where bpdu was receveid
>> >  In the meantime make sure native vlan is consistent on both ends of a
>> >  802.1Q trunk and your vtp switches setup  like VTP mode and domain
>> names
>> >
>> >  I hope it help you.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >  On Tue, Sep 3, 2013, at 06:00 PM, Marko Milivojevic wrote:
>> >  > Without straight-out giving you an answer (tell me if you want that),
>> >  > let's
>> >  > try to understand the problem first…
>> >  >
>> >  > What do you think is causing this inconsistency?
>> >  >
>> >  > --
>> >  > Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S)
>> >  > Senior CCIE Instructor / Managing Partner - IPexpert
>> >  >
>> >  >
>> >  > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Saleh Batouq <[email protected]>
>> >  > wrote:
>> >  >
>> >  > > WB3-Lab9
>> >  > > --------
>> >  > > Task: L2VPN
>> >  > > ------
>> >  > >
>> >  > >
>> >  > > I am running this on GNS, I have the AToM properly configured and
>> >  > > functional.
>> >  > >
>> >  > > BUT I get Inconsistency messege on Cat1 & Cat3
>> >  > >
>> >  > > Any suggestion on over-riding this inconsistency?
>> >  > >
>> >  > >
>> >  > >
>> >  > >
>> >  > > The following are the outputs of show commands:
>> >  > >
>> >  > >
>> >  > >
>> >  > >
>> >  > > On R2
>> >  > > -----
>> >  > >
>> >  > > R2#sh mpls l2transport vc
>> >  > >
>> >  > > Local intf     Local circuit              Dest address    VC ID
>> >  Status
>> >  > > -------------  -------------------------- ---------------
>> ----------
>> >  > > ----------
>> >  > > Fa0/0.211      Eth VLAN 211               70.18.115.5     25
>> > UP
>> >  > >
>> >  > >
>> >  > > On R5
>> >  > > ------
>> >  > >
>> >  > > R5#sh mpls l2transport vc
>> >  > >
>> >  > > Local intf     Local circuit              Dest address    VC ID
>> >  Status
>> >  > > -------------  -------------------------- ---------------
>> ----------
>> >  > > ----------
>> >  > > Fa0/1.52       Eth VLAN 52                70.18.115.2     25
>> > UP
>> >  > >
>> >  > >
>> >  > >
>> >  > >
>> >  > >
>> >  > > BUT I get Inconsistency messege on Cat1 & Cat3
>> >  > > --------------------------------------------------
>> >  > >
>> >  > >
>> >  > > On Cat1
>> >  > > -------
>> >  > >
>> >  > > Cat1(config)# PVST+:Inconsistency timer expired. inconsistency 2
>> >  > >                  cleared for FastEthernet1/2
>> >  > >
>> >  > > *Mar  1 01:44:56.119: %SPANTREE-2-RECV_PVID_ERR: Received BPDU with
>> >  > > inconsistent peer vlan id 52 on FastEthernet1/2 VLAN211.
>> >  > > *Mar  1 01:44:56.119: %SPANTREE-2-BLOCK_PVID_LOCAL: Blocking
>> >  > > FastEthernet1/2 on VLAN211. Inconsistent local vlan.
>> >  > >
>> >  > >
>> >  > >
>> >  > > Cat1#sh spanning-tree inconsistentports
>> >  > >
>> >  > > Name                 Interface            Inconsistency
>> >  > > -------------------- -------------------- ------------------
>> >  > > VLAN211              FastEthernet1/2      Port VLAN ID Mismatch
>> >  > >
>> >  > > Number of inconsistent ports (segments) in the system : 1
>> >  > >
>> >  > > On Cat3
>> >  > > -------
>> >  > >
>> >  > > [OK]
>> >  > > Cat3#
>> >  > > *Mar  1 01:44:49.487: %SPANTREE-2-RECV_PVID_ERR: Received BPDU with
>> >  > > inconsistent peer vlan id 211 on FastEthernet1/5 VLAN52.
>> >  > > *Mar  1 01:44:49.487: %SPANTREE-2-BLOCK_PVID_LOCAL: Blocking
>> >  > > FastEthernet1/5 on VLAN52. Inconsistent local vlan.
>> >  > >
>> >  > >
>> >  > > Cat3#sh spanning-tree inconsistentports
>> >  > >
>> >  > > Name                 Interface            Inconsistency
>> >  > > -------------------- -------------------- ------------------
>> >  > > VLAN52               FastEthernet1/5      Port VLAN ID Mismatch
>> >  > >
>> >  > > Number of inconsistent ports (segments) in the system : 1
>> >  > >
>> >  > > Best Regards,
>> >  > >
>> >  > > Saleh Hassan Batouq
>> >  > > [email protected]
>> >  > > _______________________________________________
>> >  > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>> > please
>> >  > > visit www.ipexpert.com
>> >  > >
>> >  > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> >  > > www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>> >  > >
>> >  > > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
>> >  > >
>> >  > _______________________________________________
>> >  > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>> > please
>> >  > visit www.ipexpert.com
>> >  >
>> >  > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> >  > www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>> >  >
>> >  > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
>> >
>> >
>> >  --
>> >  This message is intended for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed
>> >  and may contain information that is privileged or confidential.
>> >  If you are not the addressee you must not read,use or disclose the
>> >  contents of this email.
>> >  Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the transmission of
>> >  viruses, the recipient should carry out virus and other checks,
>> >  as they consider appropriate.
>> >  Myself accepts no responsibility in this regard.
>> > _______________________________________________
>> >  For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>> please
>> > visit www.ipexpert.com
>> >
>> >  Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> > www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>> >
>> >  http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > This message is intended for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed
>> and
>> > may contain information that is privileged or confidential.
>> > If you are not the addressee you must not read,use or disclose the
>> > contents of this email.
>> > Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the transmission of
>> > viruses, the recipient should carry out virus and other checks,
>> > as they consider appropriate.
>> > Myself accepts no responsibility in this regard.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > This message is intended for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed
>> and
>> > may contain information that is privileged or confidential.
>> > If you are not the addressee you must not read,use or disclose the
>> > contents of this email.
>> > Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the transmission of
>> > viruses, the recipient should carry out virus and other checks,
>> > as they consider appropriate.
>> > Myself accepts no responsibility in this regard.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > This message is intended for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed
>> and
>> > may contain information that is privileged or confidential.
>> > If you are not the addressee you must not read,use or disclose the
>> > contents of this email.
>> > Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the transmission of
>> > viruses, the recipient should carry out virus and other checks,
>> > as they consider appropriate.
>> > Myself accepts no responsibility in this regard.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > This message is intended for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed
>> and
>> > may contain information that is privileged or confidential.
>> > If you are not the addressee you must not read,use or disclose the
>> > contents of this email.
>> > Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the transmission of
>> > viruses, the recipient should carry out virus and other checks,
>> > as they consider appropriate.
>> > Myself accepts no responsibility in this regard.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>>
>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
>>
>
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs

Reply via email to