Have we reached to a conclusion or a final fix for this issue. Marko, can
you please simply tell us more.
On Sep 4, 2013 1:08 AM, "Marko Milivojevic" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Again, this is not related to AToM :-)
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 1:14 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > **
> > The only thing I can think of problems connected to the STP with
> > mismatching vlans in VLAN CONNECT MODE.
> > If I am not mistake there are 2 kind of VC type:  port-mode or VLAN-mode
> > for Ethernet L2VPNs.
> > A PortMode  will replicate all Ethernet frames received, including all
> > tagged frames.
> > Perhaps in port mode we have not the problem about mismatching vlan
> >
> > In VLAN-based mode  we will have xconnect statement will be under a
> > sub-interface
> > with own encapsulation and VLAN number specified.
> > This mode will just forward the own VLAN frames through pseudowire.
> >
> > However I think to replicate this problem.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013, at 10:04 PM, Marko Milivojevic wrote:
> >
> > Sure, but that will open the network for the loops.
> >
> > Try to focus on what the problem is, not how to get rid of the symptom
> :-)
> >
> > --
> > Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S)
> > Senior CCIE Instructor / Managing Partner - IPexpert
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 1:02 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > **
> > There are other solution for example vlan filter, also L2 protocol tunnel
> > which erase local bpdu processing.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013, at 09:57 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> >
> > I am thinking we filtering bpdu to stop bpdu from blocking inconsistent
> > vlan,bpdu filtering is acceptable for me.
> >
> > What did you think?
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013, at 08:17 PM, Marko Milivojevic wrote:
> >
> > You're getting close.
> >
> >
> > Respond to the list, please, as it may be interesting for the others to
> > see, as well.
> >
> > --
> > Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S)
> > Senior CCIE Instructor / Managing Partner - IPexpert
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 11:16 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > **
> > In fact I did not think it is related to l2vpn, althhough I  do not know
> > different vlan to VC however I am thinking is related config to port or
> > mode spanning tree,
> > I will check conifguration to end point port: if 802.1q to two side and
> > native vlans, or model of stp EEE 802.1D and pvst+
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013, at 07:32 PM, Marko Milivojevic wrote:
> >
> > That is all very correct, but that's not the cause of the error. You
> *can*
> > have different VLAN IDs on two ends of the VC, but then you need to make
> > sure something else is done. Something that causes this problem.
> >
> > Btw. it's not related to L2VPNs :-)
> >
> > --
> > Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S)
> > Senior CCIE Instructor / Managing Partner - IPexpert
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:45 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Point-to-Point L2 VPNs L2 connectivity to the attached, that make
> >  circuits of two separate sites connected across a packet network
> >  Furthemore It provide connectivity transparent without need L2
> >  connection acrosss SP core
> >
> >  In the speficic:
> >
> >  The VC identifiers at each end must match, so that the connection is
> >  uniquely
> >  addressed and MTU settings for the interfaces would have the same
> >
> >  In mpls the topmost label is the transport label for the
> >  other end's 1321P address and the second label identifies the remote AC
> >
> >  Your error usually mean you receveid bpdu tagged with vlan id that
> >  does't match vlan id where bpdu was receveid
> >  In the meantime make sure native vlan is consistent on both ends of a
> >  802.1Q trunk and your vtp switches setup  like VTP mode and domain names
> >
> >  I hope it help you.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  On Tue, Sep 3, 2013, at 06:00 PM, Marko Milivojevic wrote:
> >  > Without straight-out giving you an answer (tell me if you want that),
> >  > let's
> >  > try to understand the problem first…
> >  >
> >  > What do you think is causing this inconsistency?
> >  >
> >  > --
> >  > Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S)
> >  > Senior CCIE Instructor / Managing Partner - IPexpert
> >  >
> >  >
> >  > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Saleh Batouq <[email protected]>
> >  > wrote:
> >  >
> >  > > WB3-Lab9
> >  > > --------
> >  > > Task: L2VPN
> >  > > ------
> >  > >
> >  > >
> >  > > I am running this on GNS, I have the AToM properly configured and
> >  > > functional.
> >  > >
> >  > > BUT I get Inconsistency messege on Cat1 & Cat3
> >  > >
> >  > > Any suggestion on over-riding this inconsistency?
> >  > >
> >  > >
> >  > >
> >  > >
> >  > > The following are the outputs of show commands:
> >  > >
> >  > >
> >  > >
> >  > >
> >  > > On R2
> >  > > -----
> >  > >
> >  > > R2#sh mpls l2transport vc
> >  > >
> >  > > Local intf     Local circuit              Dest address    VC ID
> >  Status
> >  > > -------------  -------------------------- --------------- ----------
> >  > > ----------
> >  > > Fa0/0.211      Eth VLAN 211               70.18.115.5     25
> > UP
> >  > >
> >  > >
> >  > > On R5
> >  > > ------
> >  > >
> >  > > R5#sh mpls l2transport vc
> >  > >
> >  > > Local intf     Local circuit              Dest address    VC ID
> >  Status
> >  > > -------------  -------------------------- --------------- ----------
> >  > > ----------
> >  > > Fa0/1.52       Eth VLAN 52                70.18.115.2     25
> > UP
> >  > >
> >  > >
> >  > >
> >  > >
> >  > >
> >  > > BUT I get Inconsistency messege on Cat1 & Cat3
> >  > > --------------------------------------------------
> >  > >
> >  > >
> >  > > On Cat1
> >  > > -------
> >  > >
> >  > > Cat1(config)# PVST+:Inconsistency timer expired. inconsistency 2
> >  > >                  cleared for FastEthernet1/2
> >  > >
> >  > > *Mar  1 01:44:56.119: %SPANTREE-2-RECV_PVID_ERR: Received BPDU with
> >  > > inconsistent peer vlan id 52 on FastEthernet1/2 VLAN211.
> >  > > *Mar  1 01:44:56.119: %SPANTREE-2-BLOCK_PVID_LOCAL: Blocking
> >  > > FastEthernet1/2 on VLAN211. Inconsistent local vlan.
> >  > >
> >  > >
> >  > >
> >  > > Cat1#sh spanning-tree inconsistentports
> >  > >
> >  > > Name                 Interface            Inconsistency
> >  > > -------------------- -------------------- ------------------
> >  > > VLAN211              FastEthernet1/2      Port VLAN ID Mismatch
> >  > >
> >  > > Number of inconsistent ports (segments) in the system : 1
> >  > >
> >  > > On Cat3
> >  > > -------
> >  > >
> >  > > [OK]
> >  > > Cat3#
> >  > > *Mar  1 01:44:49.487: %SPANTREE-2-RECV_PVID_ERR: Received BPDU with
> >  > > inconsistent peer vlan id 211 on FastEthernet1/5 VLAN52.
> >  > > *Mar  1 01:44:49.487: %SPANTREE-2-BLOCK_PVID_LOCAL: Blocking
> >  > > FastEthernet1/5 on VLAN52. Inconsistent local vlan.
> >  > >
> >  > >
> >  > > Cat3#sh spanning-tree inconsistentports
> >  > >
> >  > > Name                 Interface            Inconsistency
> >  > > -------------------- -------------------- ------------------
> >  > > VLAN52               FastEthernet1/5      Port VLAN ID Mismatch
> >  > >
> >  > > Number of inconsistent ports (segments) in the system : 1
> >  > >
> >  > > Best Regards,
> >  > >
> >  > > Saleh Hassan Batouq
> >  > > [email protected]
> >  > > _______________________________________________
> >  > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> > please
> >  > > visit www.ipexpert.com
> >  > >
> >  > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> >  > > www.PlatinumPlacement.com
> >  > >
> >  > > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
> >  > >
> >  > _______________________________________________
> >  > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> > please
> >  > visit www.ipexpert.com
> >  >
> >  > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> >  > www.PlatinumPlacement.com
> >  >
> >  > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
> >
> >
> >  --
> >  This message is intended for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed
> >  and may contain information that is privileged or confidential.
> >  If you are not the addressee you must not read,use or disclose the
> >  contents of this email.
> >  Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the transmission of
> >  viruses, the recipient should carry out virus and other checks,
> >  as they consider appropriate.
> >  Myself accepts no responsibility in this regard.
> > _______________________________________________
> >  For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please
> > visit www.ipexpert.com
> >
> >  Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> > www.PlatinumPlacement.com
> >
> >  http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > This message is intended for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed
> and
> > may contain information that is privileged or confidential.
> > If you are not the addressee you must not read,use or disclose the
> > contents of this email.
> > Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the transmission of
> > viruses, the recipient should carry out virus and other checks,
> > as they consider appropriate.
> > Myself accepts no responsibility in this regard.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > This message is intended for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed
> and
> > may contain information that is privileged or confidential.
> > If you are not the addressee you must not read,use or disclose the
> > contents of this email.
> > Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the transmission of
> > viruses, the recipient should carry out virus and other checks,
> > as they consider appropriate.
> > Myself accepts no responsibility in this regard.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > This message is intended for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed
> and
> > may contain information that is privileged or confidential.
> > If you are not the addressee you must not read,use or disclose the
> > contents of this email.
> > Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the transmission of
> > viruses, the recipient should carry out virus and other checks,
> > as they consider appropriate.
> > Myself accepts no responsibility in this regard.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > This message is intended for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed
> and
> > may contain information that is privileged or confidential.
> > If you are not the addressee you must not read,use or disclose the
> > contents of this email.
> > Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the transmission of
> > viruses, the recipient should carry out virus and other checks,
> > as they consider appropriate.
> > Myself accepts no responsibility in this regard.
> >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs

Reply via email to