Perfectionist!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Donald B Johnson jr"
To:
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 4:01 PM
Subject: Re: RouterSim 3.0 [7:11342]
> I think it is "he who is without sim"
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "hal9001"
> To:
> Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 7:30 AM
> Subject: Re: RouterSim 3.0 [7:11342]
>
>
> > "Let he who is without sin, cast the first stone."
> >
> > Or something.
> >
> > Karl
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Curtis Phillips"
> > To:
> > Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 3:22 PM
> > Subject: Re: RouterSim 3.0 [7:11342]
> >
> >
> > > Give it a rest huh????
> > >
> > > Maybe you to ought to take your spat off-line.
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Kevin Wigle"
> > > To:
> > > Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 9:48 AM
> > > Subject: Re: RouterSim 3.0 [7:11342]
> > >
> > >
> > > > Jennifer,
> > > >
> > > > I'm not condemning you. I've read your posts and I thought you a
> > rational
> > > > person.
> > > >
> > > > But just read this............
> > > >
> > > > "We couldn't afford it otherwise. None of us. We all copied it to
> > > > use from our school burner. It was registered in
> > > > a co-instructors name. It was all about wanting to pass and
learning
> > and
> > > > him helping us. Not cheating or pirating.
> > > > Right or wrong, that's what we did. "
> > > >
> > > > Can't get much closer to a confession than that. "We" normally
> includes
> > > the
> > > > person talking but I'll let the lawyers haggle that one.
> > > >
> > > > Anyway, think of all the people on this list that make this list
such
> a
> > > > great place for learning.
> > > >
> > > > Howard Berkowitz, Author and Instructor
> > > >
> > > > Tom Lisa, Author and Instructor
> > > >
> > > > Priscilla Oppenheimer, Author and Instructor
> > > >
> > > > Not to mention the many CCIE's on the list.
> > > >
> > > > They give their time freely to the list which is as good as it gets.
> > > >
> > > > On the other hand, some people still want to steal from them and
> others.
> > > >
> > > > I just can't seem to reconcile how anybody can steal their work and
> then
> > > > post to a mailing list where they contribute freely. The
Transcenders
> > are
> > > > not their work but the pricipal is the same.
> > > >
> > > > Like I said, I have used "evaluation" software so I'm not saying I'm
> > above
> > > > the same issues, but I have bought legal copies of anything I found
to
> > be
> > > > useful. Also, I don't post to a publc place that may unwittingly
cast
> > > > suspicion on other people.
> > > >
> > > > And just one more thing, if you continue to post to a public email
> list
> > or
> > > > participate in any public endeavor - then you should be prepared to
> have
> > > > people question your actions and for you to defend them. Such
debates
> > > > normally are not meant to destroy the other person but to gain more
> > > insight
> > > > or impart advice/knowledge.
> > > >
> > > > Take this as you will.
> > > >
> > > > Kevin Wigle
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Jennifer Cribbs"
> > > > To:
> > > > Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 12:45 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: RouterSim 3.0 [7:11342]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > I am not used to being a defender of my actions Kevin. I am
> stopping
> > > > this.
> > > > > We don't feel the same and I do not want
> > > > > to be placed in the positon of having to defend a point in my
> personal
> > > > > history that you disagree with me about. Maybe I
> > > > > shouldn't have said anything, but I am not used to keeping secrets
> > > either.
> > > > I
> > > > > am an honest person and it is pointless to
> > > > > continue this. I should not have even replied to your baited
> > question.
> > > > > After accusations, answers are pointless, for
> > > > > accusations only breed a heated response, and I am not going to
get
> > > caught
> > > > > up in that.
> > > > >
> > > > > 7/8/2001 11:43:43 PM, Jennifer Cribbs wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >Kevin,
> > > > > >
> > > > > >I am not saying I am guilty of anything...You are! When you are
in
> a
> > > > > semester of school virtually inexperienced in the
> > > > > >computer realm, things happen. I am merely replying to a mail
that
> > was
> > > > > posted here.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >You think it is a soft piracy ring??...and it will be my fault
they
> > get
> > > > > caught??...I don't think so Kevin. You are the one
> > > > > >who is wrong. I was the student on a learning quest. And if I
was
> > > wrong
> > > > > and this is the worst thing I ever do, then I
> > > > > >won't worry or lose sleep over it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >There are so few indescretions in my life that this one just
kinda
> > > sticks
> > > > > out and came to mind...Sorry for the stress my
> > > > > >post caused you.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Jennifer
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >7/8/2001 8:41:46 PM, "Kevin Wigle" wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >>In today's litigious world, I'm surprised that anyone would go
> onto
> > a
> > > > > >>respected mailing list and publicly admit that they're guilty of
> > > > software
> > > > > >>piracy and provide enough details to be tracked down.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>Then further implicate the school by using their equipment and
> > > further
> > > > > >>implicate a "co-instructor" at the school.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>I'm sure it wouldn't take much sleuthing to find the school, the
> > > > > >>co-instructor's name and the entire "ring".
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>I'm not saying I'm lily white but I don't advertise my
> indiscretions
> > > to
> > > > the
> > > > > >>world. I'm sure a company like Cisco does not want it to be
known
> > > that
> > > > a
> > > > > >>school allowed (either explicitly or through negligence)
software
> > > piracy
> > > > > had
> > > > > >>anything to do with the academy.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>At the end of the day it is theft, we can all debate the
problems
> of
> > > > > >>obtaining affordable training/schooling, but at the end of the
> > > debate -
> > > > it
> > > > > >>is theft. The school could be sued, the academy could be
> withdrawn,
> > > the
> > > > > >>co-instructor could lose his job and legal expenses could make
> > > whatever
> > > > > >>profit you thought you made unavailable for a long time.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>Why would you want to tell us about it?
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>Kevin Wigle
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>----- Original Message -----
> > > > > >>From: "Jennifer Cribbs"
> > > > > >>To:
> > > > > >>Sent: Sunday, 08 July, 2001 17:42
> > > > > >>Subject: Re: RouterSim 3.0 [7:11342]
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> Personally, I think it's good to help people and there is a
> > > difference
> > > > > >>being
> > > > > >>> profiting from someones else's work and
> > > > > >>> helping people trying to learn. When I was in school, all the
> > > > students
> > > > > >>went
> > > > > >>> in together and bought transcender for the
> > > > > >>> ccna. We couldn't afford it otherwise. None of us. We all
> > copied
> > > it
> > > > to
> > > > > >>> use from our school burner. It was registered in
> > > > > >>> a co-instructors name. It was all about wanting to pass and
> > > learning
> > > > and
> > > > > >>> him helping us. Not cheating or pirating.
> > > > > >>> Right or wrong, that's what we did. And I will also add that
> > > > > >>transcender's
> > > > > >>> high points are the excellent explanations at
> > > > > >>> the end of each question. The questions themselves were not
> > geared
> > > in
> > > > a
> > > > > >>way
> > > > > >>> however to prepare a student for what
> > > > > >>> was coming and the structure of what the real questions were
> > about.
> > > > If
> > > > > >>you
> > > > > >>> didn't study the explanations, you might fall
> > > > > >>> into that trap of memorizing and not learning.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> People will probably disagree with me also...
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Jennifer Cribbs.
> > > > > >>> [been there, done that]
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> 7/8/2001 2:46:10 PM, "PHIMHONGKONG" wrote:
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> >contact me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] i have router sim 2.1 and
switch
> > sim
> > > +
> > > > > >>ccno
> > > > > >>> >sim
> > > > > >>> >i can burn you one
> > > > > >>> >:-d
> > > > > >>> >i dont sell pirate software . i am helping you to study :-)
> > > > > >>> >
> > > > > >>> >poeple please dont say i am pirater
> > > > > >>> >
> > > > > >>> > wrote in message
> > > > > >>> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > > > >>> >> Hi to all,
> > > > > >>> >> For anybody who own a RouterSim 3.0. I am planning to
invest
> > > > $250.00
> > > > > >>> >buying
> > > > > >>> >> RouterSim 3.0 router simulator to preopare for my CCNA
> > > > certification.
> > > > > >>Can
> > > > > >>> >I
> > > > > >>> >> burn a copy of this as my back-up? Can I simultaneously
> install
> > > > this
> > > > > to
> > > > > >>> >two
> > > > > >>> >> hard drives (i.e, to a desk top and to a lap top)?
> > > > > >>> >> Please educate me.
> > > > > >>> >>
> > > > > >>> >> Thanks,
> > > > > >>> >> Val
> > > > > >>> Have a great day!!
> > > > > >>> Jennifer
> > > > > >Have a great day!!
> > > > > >Jennifer
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Have a great day!!
> > > > > Jennifer
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11462&t=11342
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
