Perhaps the perception of the rest of us is you did not complain when Tom calls windows users names, only when you felt insulted? Why didn't you complain during the solar battery charger thread when Tom insulted windows users again for no other reason then he likes to? This habit of his has been going on for a long time and it's mostly ignored but sometimes others or myself will respond in like sarcasm.
I posted an article that was interesting to me and several users on the list apparently. I didn't offer any commentary negative or positive either way, just that I'd be on the lookout for how the rest of the systems in the contest faired. Fairly, stories concerning mac os x's security or lack of do have more interest because of the perception by some that they are more secure by nature. These kind of accurate stories reflect the true nature of operating systems as a whole, windows, mac and linux. Instead of looking at the story intellectually I get responded to with emotion, a lecture and dismissal. When I try to correct the record I get called dyslexic. And then I get told not to call people zealots? Are you really saying there are no mac partisans here? Update: Vista taken down and won....Ubuntu was the only system left standing. http://dvlabs.tippingpoint.com/blog/2008/03/28/pwn-to-own-final-day-and-wrap-up Mike On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 7:50 AM, Michael Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > That is precisely my point. It does no good to call people zealots for > liking the particular computer they use. Why use something they hate, > anyway? I would rather we not refer to people as zealots, morons, > idiots, or any number of other derogatory terms. Just provide the > information without the misanthropic commentary. > > ************************************************************************* ** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy ** ** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ ** *************************************************************************
