Jean-Christophe Helary wrote: > Ain, > > Thank you for the precision. As I wrote to Clytie I did not mean to > sound harsh. > > As I am far from understanding the actual job of a team leader > (Sophie is "my" leader) I'll wait a bit before making proposals here. > > As I wrote in my first post, the French team received .xlz files > created from the original .po. I did find that funny since OLT comes > with a filter that is very simple to use and that allows translators > to convert to .xlz if they need it. Besides, there was an encoding > problem in our files so I had to de-convert the .xlz back to .po and > to translate it in OmegaT etc.
It is dangerous - you have original sdf-template and to get translated sdf you have to convert your translations 4 times ;) By the way, I noticed that xliff files are stored in packed format, xlz? It means that when using xliff as only intermdiate version, without po-step, you'll not have any overview over changes in version control system? Its only a question, not statement - I dont know almost anything about deeper mechanism of version control. ain --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
