edstat-l
Thread
Date
Find
[
Earlier messages
]
[
Later messages
]
Messages by Thread
Re: Patenting a statistical innovation
Radford Neal
Re: Patenting a statistical innovation
A.J. Rossini
Re: Patenting a statistical innovation
Paige Miller
Re: Patenting a statistical innovation
Donald Burrill
Re: Patenting a statistical innovation
Herman Rubin
Re: Patenting a statistical innovation
A.J. Rossini
Re: Patenting a statistical innovation
Jay Warner
Re: Patenting a statistical innovation
Peter Lewycky
Re: Patenting a statistical innovation
Warren Sarle
Re: Patenting a statistical innovation
Paige Miller
Re: Patenting a statistical innovation
dennis roberts
power/beta macro
dennis roberts
faculty positions
Alan Hutson
Repeated measurement
DSJAY
Re: Repeated measurement
Donald Burrill
Stat History
David Robinson
Re: Stat History
David Heiser
Re: Stat History
Jonathan G. Campbell
Re: Stat History
Peter Lewycky
toner supplies
toner4
toner supplies
toner4
toner supplies
toner1
toner supplies
toner5
toner supplies
toner11
Re: credit risk analysis
outlier
Re: credit risk analysis
outlier
Chicago Tribune Nation World -- BUSH OFFICIAL TO DECIDE CENSUS SAMPLING ISSUE
Zina Taran
Re: Chicago Tribune Nation World -- BUSH OFFICIAL TO DECIDE CENSUS SAMPLING ISSUE
Reg Jordan
Re: Chicago Tribune Nation World -- BUSH OFFICIAL TO DECIDE CENSUS SAMPLING ISSUE
Dale Berger
Re: Chicago Tribune Nation World -- BUSH OFFICIAL TO DECIDE CENSUS SAMPLING ISSUE
J. Williams
Quotes from J. W. Tukey
Jan Ljung
Re: Quotes from J. W. Tukey
P.G.Hamer
Re: Quotes from J. W. Tukey
Herman Rubin
Re: Quotes from J. W. Tukey
Alexander Tsyplakov
Re: MCAS
Daniel P. B. Smith
Re: MCAS
Herman Rubin
Re: citations & journals (satire)
Jeff Rasmussen
Re: citations & journals (satire)
Donald Burrill
Re: citations & journals (satire)
Jeff Rasmussen
Decision Sci SW on 68K Mac
David J Firth
Tukey Old Testament Reference?
Ailan Chubb
citations
dennis roberts
Re: citations
dennis roberts
Re: citations
Irving Scheffe
Survival Analysis - Derivation of Functions?
Michelle White
Re: Survival Analysis - Derivation of Functions?
Rich Ulrich
random effects and adding variance
nick
Chair in E-commerce at McGill
Jim Ramsay
Vuong test
Christian Petersen
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
Irving Scheffe
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
dennis roberts
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
Irving Scheffe
citation rates
dennis roberts
Re: citation rates
Irving Scheffe
Peto test
masaya
Peto test
masaya
Brand New E-Mail pager for FR-EE! 34
bigjoe
algorithm cross correlation
Hanke
Re: algorithm cross correlation
Elliot Cramer
Help needed with sample size decision
Mob
multtest
dennis roberts
Re: multtest
Jerry Dallal
RE: multtest
Scheltema, Karen
multtest
dennis roberts
Re: multtest
Jerry Dallal
Re: multtest
Jerry Dallal
Negócios On-Line
LP Publicidade
Regression analysis.
Joe Meyer
Re: Regression analysis.
William B. Ware
Re: Regression analysis.
Jay Warner
Fitting probability distribution
Dhiman Chatterjee
Re: Fitting probability distribution
Veeral Patel
Re: Fitting probability distribution
Thomas Gatliffe
Re: Fitting probability distribution
Veeral Patel
Re: Statistics is Bunk {thanks!}
Jeff Rasmussen
Re: Statistics is Bunk {thanks!}
dennis roberts
random number generation for generalized gauss
Hideo HIROSE
Re: random number generation for generalized gauss
Herman Rubin
correlation and Ti-60X calculator
David B
Re: correlation and Ti-60X calculator
Reg Jordan
Re: correlation and Ti-60X calculator
Donald Burrill
Re: correlation and Ti-60X calculator
David J Firth
needed clustering algorithm for similar mean groups
EAKIN MARK E
Re: needed clustering algorithm for similar mean groups
Rich Ulrich
Re: needed clustering algorithm for similar mean groups
jim clark
papers
dennis roberts
papers
dennis roberts
Improved Bonferroni Inequalities
Klaus Dohmen
$20 off Peace Promoting Gift Baskets! aqdec
iowra
$20 off Peace Promoting Gift Baskets! lptrs
flopy
Re: Simulating T tests for Likert scales
Rich Ulrich
Re: Simulating T tests for Likert scales
Will Hopkins
Re: Simulating T tests for Likert scales
Rich Ulrich
duration data
Alexander Tsyplakov
Hypothesis Testing where General Limit Theorem doesn't hold?
Neo Sunrider
Re: Hypothesis Testing where General Limit Theorem doesn't hold?
Glen Barnett
Re: Hypothesis Testing where General Limit Theorem doesn't hold?
Neo Sunrider
Re: Hypothesis Testing where General Limit Theorem doesn't hold?
Radford Neal
Re: Hypothesis Testing where General Limit Theorem doesn't hold?
Rich Ulrich
Re: Hypothesis Testing where General Limit Theorem doesn't hold?
Jay Warner
a rare invitation has arrived for you, you lucky duck!
wdude
The number of DOE runs for variable factors
L. D. Marks
Re: The number of DOE runs for variable factors
Bob Wheeler
No Subject
BAECULA
No Subject
Jineshwar Singh
No Subject
Mark W. Humphries
No Subject
áÂÂÁËÕÍÏ× ÷ÁÄÉÍ ìÅÏÎÁÒÄÏ×ÉÞ
No Subject
BeyondTheFormula
No Subject
NEUMA TERESINHA NADAL
No Subject
cchiu+
No Subject
Hindley, Jane
No Subject
SamFaz Consulting
Re: (none)
Rich Ulrich
Re: (none)
Donald Burrill
No Subject
Carl Huberty
Re:
Robert J. MacG. Dawson
Re:
dennis roberts
Re:
dennis roberts
Re: (none)
Rich Ulrich
Re: (none)
EugeneGall
Re: (none)
Jay Warner
Re: (none)
Rich Ulrich
No Subject
Fanny Martino
SLR sensitivity program I wrote
EAKIN MARK E
MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
Gene Gallagher
Re: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
Gene Gallagher
Re: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
dennis roberts
Re: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
Gene Gallagher
On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
Irving Scheffe
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
dennis roberts
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
Irving Scheffe
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical
jim clark
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
Irving Scheffe
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
Rich Ulrich
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
Irving Scheffe
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
Irving Scheffe
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
Milo Schield
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
Irving Scheffe
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
Milo Schield
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
Irving Scheffe
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
Milo Schield
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
Milo Schield
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
Rich Ulrich
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
Irving Scheffe
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
Rich Ulrich
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
Radford Neal
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
Rich Ulrich
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
Irving Scheffe
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
Rich Ulrich
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
Irving Scheffe
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
Rich Ulrich
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
Irving Scheffe
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
Thom Baguley
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
Radford Neal
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
Thom Baguley
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
Radford Neal
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical
jim clark
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical
Radford Neal
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
Irving Scheffe
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical
jim clark
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
Irving Scheffe
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
dennis roberts
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism &
Jerry Dallal
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
Irving Scheffe
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism &
EugeneGall
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism &
Jerry Dallal
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism &
Neville X. Elliven
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
dennis roberts
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
Thom Baguley
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
Irving Scheffe
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
Thom Baguley
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
Irving Scheffe
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
Rich Ulrich
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
dennis roberts
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
Irving Scheffe
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
Rich Ulrich
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
dennis roberts
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
Rich Ulrich
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
Radford Neal
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
Rich Ulrich
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
Irving Scheffe
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
Irving Scheffe
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
Radford Neal
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
Radford Neal
MIT numbers. Was: Re: On inappropriate hy.
Rich Ulrich
Re: MIT numbers. Was: Re: On inappropriate hy.
Irving Scheffe
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
Irving Scheffe
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
Thom Baguley
Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
dennis roberts
Re: Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
Paul R Swank
Re: Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
Donald Burrill
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical
Jerry Dallal
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical
Radford Neal
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical
Jerry Dallal
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
Irving Scheffe
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
Irving Scheffe
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
Irving Scheffe
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
dennis roberts
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism & statistical bunk
Irving Scheffe
Re: On inappropriate hypothesis testing. Was: MIT Sexism
Radford Neal
[
Earlier messages
]
[
Later messages
]