Messages by Date
-
2005/04/13
[EM] typo
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/04/13
RE: [EM] Re: Simpson-Kramer definition
Paul Kislanko
-
2005/04/13
[EM] Re: Simpson-Kramer definition
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/04/13
RE: [EM] Re: Letter to author of voting system article
Paul Kislanko
-
2005/04/13
RE: [EM] Siimpson-Kramer definition
Paul Kislanko
-
2005/04/13
Re: [EM] Collecting Ordinal Information
Russ Paielli
-
2005/04/13
[EM] Re: Letter to author of voting system article
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/04/13
[EM] Siimpson-Kramer definition
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/04/13
[EM] Re: Collecting Ordinal Information
Simmons, Forest
-
2005/04/13
[EM] Collecting Ordinal Information
Simmons, Forest
-
2005/04/13
Re: [EM] Sincere methods
Jobst Heitzig
-
2005/04/13
[EM]Re: AWP versus AM (and DMC)
Chris Benham
-
2005/04/13
Re: [EM] Sincere methods
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/04/13
[EM] Re: Letter to an author of a voting system article
RLSuter
-
2005/04/12
[EM] No, James, I don't refer to Simpson-Kramer as Plain Condorcet
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/04/12
Re: "Best" candidates, and Social Orderings (was: [EM] Sincere methods)
Juho Laatu
-
2005/04/12
Re: [EM] Sincere methods
Juho Laatu
-
2005/04/12
Re: [EM] Sincere methods
Juho Laatu
-
2005/04/12
[EM] Re: Mike's Mistake, part 2
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/04/12
[EM] Re: Mike, what are we arguing about?
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/04/12
[EM] Letter to an author of a voting system article
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/04/12
[EM] Re: fallacy
Russ Paielli
-
2005/04/12
[EM] Re: realization on method equivalence
Chris Benham
-
2005/04/12
[EM] Mike: what exactly are we arguing about?
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/04/12
[EM] Mike's mistake, part 2
Russ Paielli
-
2005/04/12
[EM] realization on method equivalence
Russ Paielli
-
2005/04/11
[EM] Mike's "mistake"
Russ Paielli
-
2005/04/11
[EM] Russ, 12 April, '05, 0530 GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/04/11
[EM] James, 4/11/05, 2227
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/04/11
[EM] James, defensive strategy need, CW loss, majority wishes violations
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/04/11
[EM] Re: Normative criteria
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/04/11
[EM] Re: RAV/DMC
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/04/11
[EM] Optimally Sorted Pairwise Methods (AWP/ASM/AM/CWP)
Araucaria Araucana
-
2005/04/11
[EM] Re: RAV/DMC
Araucaria Araucana
-
2005/04/11
[EM]Re: Normative criteria
Chris Benham
-
2005/04/10
[EM] let Mike Ossipoff know what you think about his lies
Russ Paielli
-
2005/04/10
Re: [EM] I'm not going to waste more time replying to Russ
Russ Paielli
-
2005/04/10
Re: [EM] RAV/DMC (was "majorities and ordinal-only pairwise methods")
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/04/10
[EM] A proposal from a member of the public
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/04/10
Re: [EM] majorities and ordinal-only pairwise methods
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/04/10
Re: [EM]Re: AWP versus AM (and DMC)
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/04/10
[EM] Normative criteria
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/04/10
[EM] I'm not going to waste more time replying to Russ
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/04/10
Re: [EM] typo
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/04/10
Re: [EM] Therefore offensive order-reversal in wv won't look worse than Plurality
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/04/10
[EM] Therefore offensive order-reversal in wv won't look worse than Plurality
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/04/10
[EM] Re: Kiss your paradigm goodbye
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/04/10
[EM] typo
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/04/10
Re: [EM] majorities and ordinal-only pairwise methods
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/04/10
Re: [EM] majorities and ordinal-only pairwise methods
Jobst Heitzig
-
2005/04/10
Re: [EM] majorities and ordinal-only pairwise methods
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/04/10
[EM]Re: AWP versus AM (and DMC)
Chris Benham
-
2005/04/10
Re: [EM] majorities and ordinal-only pairwise methods
Jobst Heitzig
-
2005/04/10
Re: [EM] majorities and ordinal-only pairwise methods
Russ Paielli
-
2005/04/10
Re: [EM] Re: Definite Majority Choice, AWP, AM
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/04/10
Re: [EM] majorities and ordinal-only pairwise methods
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/04/10
Re: [EM] majorities and ordinal-only pairwise methods
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/04/10
[EM] majorities and ordinal-only pairwise methods
Russ Paielli
-
2005/04/10
Re: [EM] Re: Definite Majority Choice, AWP, AM
Russ Paielli
-
2005/04/09
Re: [EM] The result of offensive strategy isn't different. Kiss your paradigm goo
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/04/09
Re: [EM] Re: Definite Majority Choice, AWP, AM
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/04/09
[EM] The result of offensive strategy isn't different. Kiss your paradigm goodbye.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/04/09
[EM] James, 9 April, 2355 GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/04/09
Re: [EM] a majority rule definition based on the Smith set
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/04/08
[EM] Mike: strategy (brief)
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/04/08
[EM] Mike: majority rule
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/04/08
Re: [EM] a majority rule definition based on the Smith set
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/04/08
Re: [EM] Kevin, 8 April, '05, 0533 GMT
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/04/08
Re: [EM] AWP versus AM (was "summary of Condorcet anti-strategy measures")
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/04/08
[EM] 1 example in which Plurality fails all the defensive strategy criteria
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/04/08
[EM] typo
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/04/08
[EM] Re: Ballot Design
Araucaria Araucana
-
2005/04/08
RE: [EM] Ballot Design
James Gilmour
-
2005/04/08
[EM] Ballot Design
Lloyd Caesar
-
2005/04/07
[EM] About the demonstration that Plurality fails PSBC
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/04/07
[EM] Kevin, 8 April, '05, 0533 GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/04/07
[EM] Euclidean distance typo
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/04/07
Re: [EM] Democratic Fair Choice and the set P
Jobst Heitzig
-
2005/04/07
[EM] pSTV v0.7
Jeffrey O'Neill
-
2005/04/07
[EM] Democratic Fair Choice and the set P
Simmons, Forest
-
2005/04/06
Re: [EM] Russ, 4/6/05, 2232
Russ Paielli
-
2005/04/06
[EM] Sorry, posted it twice
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/04/06
Re: [EM] Re: Definite Majority Choice
Russ Paielli
-
2005/04/06
[EM] Russ, 4/6/05, 2232
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/04/06
[EM] Re: Objections to majority
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/04/06
Re: [EM] Objections to majority
Russ Paielli
-
2005/04/06
[EM] Objections to majority
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/04/06
[EM] Re: Definite Majority Choice
Simmons, Forest
-
2005/04/06
[EM] Re: Definite Majority Choice
Araucaria Araucana
-
2005/04/05
Re: [EM] Re: Definite Majority Choice
Russ Paielli
-
2005/04/05
[EM] Re: A majority rule definition based on the Smith set
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/04/05
Re: [EM] Re: Definite Majority Choice
Russ Paielli
-
2005/04/05
[EM] Re: A majority rule definition based on the Smith set
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/04/05
[EM] (no subject)
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/04/05
[EM] AWP versus AM (was "summary of Condorcet anti-strategy measures")
Chris Benham
-
2005/04/05
Re: [EM] a majority rule definition based on the Smith set
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/04/05
[EM] Re: Definite Majority Choice
Araucaria Araucana
-
2005/04/05
[EM] Re: Equivalent defeat strength for Approval Sorted Margins / Approval Margins
Araucaria Araucana
-
2005/04/05
[EM] Re: Definite Majority Choice
Chris Benham
-
2005/04/05
[EM] RE: Equivalent defeat strength for Approval Sorted Margins / Approval Margins
Simmons, Forest
-
2005/04/05
[EM] Equivalent defeat strength for Approval Sorted Margins / Approval Margins
Monkey Puzzle
-
2005/04/05
[EM] Re: Definite Majority Choice
Araucaria Araucana
-
2005/04/04
[EM] Definite Majority Choice
Russ Paielli
-
2005/04/04
[EM] James, 5 April, '05, 0645 GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/04/04
Re: [EM] a majority rule definition based on the Smith set
Russ Paielli
-
2005/04/04
[EM] summary answers
Simmons, Forest
-
2005/04/04
[EM] Summary Answers
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/04/04
RE: [EM] a majority rule definition based on the Smith set
Paul Kislanko
-
2005/04/04
Re: [EM] a majority rule definition based on the Smith set
Daniel Bishop
-
2005/04/04
Re: [EM] Sincere methods
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/04/04
Re: "Best" candidates, and Social Orderings (was: [EM] Sincere methods)
Steve Eppley
-
2005/04/04
Re: [EM] Sincere methods
Eric Gorr
-
2005/04/04
[EM] Re: summary answers
Araucaria Araucana
-
2005/04/04
[EM] Re: Definite Majority Choice, AWP, AM
Araucaria Araucana
-
2005/04/04
"Best" candidates, and Social Orderings (was: [EM] Sincere methods)
Jobst Heitzig
-
2005/04/04
Re: [EM] summary answers
Jobst Heitzig
-
2005/04/04
Re: [EM] a majority rule definition based on the Smith set
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/04/04
Re: [EM] Sincere methods
Juho Laatu
-
2005/04/04
Re: [EM] Sincere methods
Juho Laatu
-
2005/04/04
Re: [EM] summary answers
Jobst Heitzig
-
2005/04/04
Re: [EM] summary answers
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/04/04
Re: [EM] a majority rule definition based on the Smith set
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/04/04
[EM] summary answers
Curt Siffert
-
2005/04/04
Re: [EM] a majority rule definition based on the Smith set
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/04/03
[EM] a majority rule definition based on the Smith set
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/04/03
[EM] James, 4 April, '05, 0400
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/04/03
[EM] clarification of last post
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/04/03
Re: [EM] summary of Condorcet anti-strategy measures
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/04/03
Re: [EM] Re: Conversations with people new to voting systems
Russ Paielli
-
2005/04/03
[EM] summary of Condorcet anti-strategy measures
Chris Benham
-
2005/04/02
Re: [EM] James: Strategy definitions and criteria, 29 March, 0521 GMT
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/04/02
Re: [EM] Re: Conversations with people new to voting systems
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/04/02
[EM] Re: Conversations with people new to voting systems
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/04/02
Re: [EM] James--Majority rule definition, 29 March, 0632 GMT
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/04/02
[EM] Minor typo in "Schulze's method isn't BeatpathWinner"
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/04/02
[EM] Schulze's method isn't BeatpathWinner
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/04/02
[EM] Schulze's method isn't BeatpathWinner
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/04/02
Re: [EM] CWO may be worth fighting for
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/04/02
[EM] Typo
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/04/02
Re: [EM] Re: Definite Majority Choice, AWP, AM
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/04/02
Re: [EM] Sincere methods
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/04/02
[EM] Re: "weak & strong preferences", Steve Eppley EM post , 5 Mar.1997
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/04/02
Re: [EM] Sincere methods
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/04/02
Re: [EM] Ranked Pairs tiebreaker scheme
Eric Gorr
-
2005/04/02
Re: [EM] Ranked Pairs tiebreaker scheme
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/04/02
Re: [EM] Ranked Pairs tiebreaker scheme
Eric Gorr
-
2005/04/02
[EM] Ranked Pairs tiebreaker scheme
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/04/02
[EM] Re: Definite Majority Choice, AWP, AM
Chris Benham
-
2005/04/02
Re: [EM] Schulze's method is BeatpathWinner
Markus Schulze
-
2005/04/02
Re: [EM] summary of Condorcet anti-strategy measures
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/04/01
[EM] Statement left out
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/04/01
[EM] Contd: Why CW maximizes SU
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/04/01
[EM] Typo
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/04/01
[EM] Re: Schulze's method is BeatpathWinner
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/04/01
[EM] summary of Condorcet anti-strategy measures
Chris Benham
-
2005/04/01
Re: [EM] Schulze's method is BeatpathWinner
Markus Schulze
-
2005/03/31
[EM] Re: SSD is BeatpathWinner
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/31
[EM] Distance measure--Are issue-position differences additive?
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/31
Re: [EM] condorcet methods
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/03/31
Re: [EM] condorcet methods
Bart Ingles
-
2005/03/31
[EM] Schulze's method isn't BeatpathWinner
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/31
[EM] condorcet methods
Curt Siffert
-
2005/03/31
Re: [EM] Sincere methods
Juho Laatu
-
2005/03/31
[EM] Re: Definite Majority Choice, AWP, AM
Forest Simmons
-
2005/03/31
[EM] Approval Strategies
Forest Simmons
-
2005/03/31
[EM] Re: Election-methods Digest, Vol 9, Issue 87
Forest Simmons
-
2005/03/31
Re: [EM] Sincere methods
Juho Laatu
-
2005/03/31
[EM] Re: DMC,AWP,AM
Chris Benham
-
2005/03/31
Re: [EM] BeatpathWinner is SSD
Markus Schulze
-
2005/03/30
Re: [EM] Sincere methods
Juho Laatu
-
2005/03/30
[EM] Approval Strategies
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/30
[EM] Re: BeatpathWinner is SSD
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/30
[EM] Voting paradoxes
Joseph Malkevitch
-
2005/03/30
Re: [EM] Sincere methods
Gervase Lam
-
2005/03/30
Re: [EM] LNHarm performance: CDTT and Schulze
Gervase Lam
-
2005/03/30
Re: [EM] DMC,AWP,AM
Jobst Heitzig
-
2005/03/30
[EM] Re: Definite Majority Choice, AWP, AM
Jobst Heitzig
-
2005/03/30
[EM] Re: DMC,AWP,AM
Forest Simmons
-
2005/03/30
[EM] Re: DMC,AWP,AM
Araucaria Araucana
-
2005/03/30
[EM] DMC,AWP,AM
Forest Simmons
-
2005/03/30
[EM] Re: Definite Majority Choice, AWP, AM
Araucaria Araucana
-
2005/03/30
Re: [EM] election-methods-electorama....@electorama.com
Jobst Heitzig
-
2005/03/30
[EM] election-methods-electorama....@electorama.com
Chris Benham
-
2005/03/30
Re: [EM]Definite Majority Choice, AWP, AM
Jobst Heitzig
-
2005/03/30
[EM]Definite Majority Choice, AWP, AM
Chris Benham
-
2005/03/29
Re: [EM] BeatpathWinner is SSD
Markus.Schulze
-
2005/03/29
Re: [EM] LNHarm performance: MMPO
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/03/29
[EM] Voting correction
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/29
[EM] Ralph--rating every candidate low
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/29
[EM] Order-reversal correction
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/29
[EM] Chris--burying
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/29
[EM] Markus--BeatpathWinner isn't SSD
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/29
Re: [EM] LNHarm performance: CDTT and Schulze
Gervase Lam
-
2005/03/29
Re: [EM] Sincere methods
Gervase Lam
-
2005/03/29
[EM] Re: Democratic Fair Choice
Forest Simmons
-
2005/03/29
[EM] Approval Strategy
Forest Simmons
-
2005/03/29
[EM] James: Strategy definitions and criteria, 29 March, 0521 GMT
Chris Benham
-
2005/03/28
Re: [EM] Markus, criteria similiar to majority rule definition
Markus.Schulze
-
2005/03/28
[EM] Re: Conversationis with people new to voting systems
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/28
[EM] Markus, criteria similiar to majority rule definition
MIKE OSSIPOFF