Messages by Date
-
2005/03/28
[EM] James--Majority rule definition, 29 March, 0632 GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/28
Re: [EM]Definite Majority Choice, AWP, AM
Juho Laatu
-
2005/03/28
[EM] James: Strategy definitions and criteria, 29 March, 0521 GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/28
[EM]Definite Majority Choice, AWP, AM
Chris Benham
-
2005/03/28
[EM] Manipulation Proofing Approval
Forest Simmons
-
2005/03/28
[EM] Re: Democratic Fair Choice
Forest Simmons
-
2005/03/28
Re: [EM] LNHarm performance: from B to A
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/03/28
[EM] Re: Definite Majority Choice, AWP, AM
Araucaria Araucana
-
2005/03/28
[EM] Democratic Fair Choice
Jobst Heitzig
-
2005/03/28
Re: [EM] median rating / lower quartile
Forest Simmons
-
2005/03/28
Re: [EM] (oops) Smith//Truncation set
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/03/28
Re: [EM] LNHarm performance; majority rule definitions
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/03/28
Re: [EM]CNTT,QLTD ? (enquiry from John Hodges)
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/03/28
Re: [EM] James--CP, AERLO, ATLO, defensive strategy definiltion
Markus.Schulze
-
2005/03/28
[EM]CNTT,QLTD ? (enquiry from John Hodges)
Chris Benham
-
2005/03/28
Re: [EM] James: Part II, strategy terms
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/03/27
Re: [EM] LNHarm performance: CDTT and Schulze
Markus.Schulze
-
2005/03/27
[EM] James: Part II, strategy terms
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/27
[EM] correction
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/03/27
[EM] LNHarm performance: CDTT and Schulze
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/03/27
Re: [EM] median rating / lower quartile
Bart Ingles
-
2005/03/27
Re: [EM] Conversations with people new to voting systems
RLSuter
-
2005/03/27
Re: [EM] median rating / lower quartile
Jobst Heitzig
-
2005/03/27
[EM] Mike: majority rule definition
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/03/27
[EM] Mike: strategy terms
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/03/27
[EM] Mike: cardinal pairwise
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/03/26
[EM] James--CP, AERLO, ATLO, defensive strategy definiltion
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/26
Re: [EM] Conversations with people new to voting systems
Russ Paielli
-
2005/03/26
[EM] Participation and IRV
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/26
[EM] Distance measure--Are issue-position differences additive?
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/26
[EM] Conversations with people new to voting systems
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/26
Re: [EM] Social utility is more important than median utility
Bart Ingles
-
2005/03/26
Re: [EM] Pairwise Approval Voting
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/03/26
Re: [EM] Pairwise Approval Voting
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/03/26
Re: [EM] Pairwise Approval Voting
Russ Paielli
-
2005/03/26
RE: [EM] Pairwise Approval Voting
Paul Kislanko
-
2005/03/26
[EM] Pairwise Approval Voting
Russ Paielli
-
2005/03/26
Re: [EM] IRV & Participation Criterion
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/03/26
[EM] IRV & Participation Criterion
Eric Gorr
-
2005/03/26
Re: [EM] median rating / lower quartile
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/03/26
Re: [EM]Definite Majority Choice, AWP, AM
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/03/25
[EM] Continuation of that 1996 March 24 posting to EM, advocating wv
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/25
[EM] 1996 March 24 advocacy of wv
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/25
[EM] Early discussion of wv on EM
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/25
[EM] How would Median CR work?
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/25
[EM] Social utility is more important than median utility
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/25
Re: [EM] median rating / lower quartile
Daniel Bishop
-
2005/03/25
Re: [EM] median rating / lower quartile
Fan de Condorcet
-
2005/03/25
[EM] median rating / lower quartile
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/03/25
[EM] Re: Quartiles for CR
Forest Simmons
-
2005/03/25
Re: [EM]Definite Majority Choice, AWP, AM
Juho Laatu
-
2005/03/25
Re: [EM] Sincere methods
Juho Laatu
-
2005/03/25
[EM] Is an approval cutoff option necessary?
Monkey Puzzle
-
2005/03/25
Re: [EM] Andrew: Sincere methodsd
Jobst Heitzig
-
2005/03/24
[EM] Clarification about pork-chops meeting criteria
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/24
[EM] Chris--Plurality, a pork chop, and NDD
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/24
[EM] Andrew: Sincere methodsd
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/24
[EM] James, about PC and Simpson-Kramer
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/24
[EM] Simpson-Kramer
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/24
[EM] A precise abstract definition of preference
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/24
[EM] Re: Approval Questions
Forest Simmons
-
2005/03/24
[EM] Re: Sincere Methods
Forest Simmons
-
2005/03/24
[EM] Re: public acceptability
Forest Simmons
-
2005/03/24
[EM] Re: Approval Questions
Jobst Heitzig
-
2005/03/24
[EM] Re: Approval Questions
Forest Simmons
-
2005/03/24
Re: [EM]Definite Majority Choice, AWP, AM
Jobst Heitzig
-
2005/03/24
[EM] Re: Definite Majority Choice, AWP, AM
Araucaria Araucana
-
2005/03/24
[EM] Raynaud not monotonic
Rob LeGrand
-
2005/03/24
[EM]Definite Majority Choice, AWP, AM
Chris Benham
-
2005/03/24
[EM] "plain Condorcet" debate
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/03/24
Re: [EM] Simpson-Kramer
Markus Schulze
-
2005/03/23
Re: [EM] better names for "sequential dropping"
Rob Lanphier
-
2005/03/23
Re: [EM] Simpson-Kramer
Russ Paielli
-
2005/03/23
[EM] Simpson-Kramer
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/23
Re: [EM] Sincere methods
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/03/23
[EM] better names for "sequential dropping"
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/03/23
Re: [EM] Sincere methods
Gervase Lam
-
2005/03/23
Re: [EM] CWO may be worth fighting for
Jobst Heitzig
-
2005/03/23
Re: [EM] ruminations on ordinal and cardinal information
Russ Paielli
-
2005/03/23
Re: [EM] ruminations on ordinal and cardinal information
Russ Paielli
-
2005/03/23
[EM] Re: Some hard example for Approval Voting
Araucaria Araucana
-
2005/03/23
Re: [EM] Sincere methods
Andrew Myers
-
2005/03/23
RE: [EM] Chris, DD, 23 March
Paul Kislanko
-
2005/03/23
[EM] Chris, DD, 23 March
Chris Benham
-
2005/03/23
Re: [EM] Sincere methods
Juho Laatu
-
2005/03/23
Re: [EM] "margins" Condorcet methods have a critical strategy problem
Juho Laatu
-
2005/03/23
Re: [EM] Sincere methods
Jobst Heitzig
-
2005/03/23
[EM] Re: Sincere methods
Juho Laatu
-
2005/03/23
[EM] Re: Sincere methods
Andrew Myers
-
2005/03/23
Re: [EM] Sincere methods
Juho Laatu
-
2005/03/23
Re: [EM] Sincere methods
Eric Gorr
-
2005/03/23
Re: [EM] publicly acceptability of election methods
Eric Gorr
-
2005/03/23
[EM] I forgot something important...
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/03/23
Re: [EM] Simpson-Kramer Method
Markus Schulze
-
2005/03/23
RE: [EM] publicly acceptability of election methods
James Gilmour
-
2005/03/22
[EM] CWO may be worth fighting for
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/03/22
[EM] Sincere methods
Juho Laatu
-
2005/03/22
[EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy
Juho Laatu
-
2005/03/22
[EM] Re: Approval Questions
Jobst Heitzig
-
2005/03/22
Re: [EM] publicly acceptability of election methods
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/03/22
[EM] Chris, DD, 23 March
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/22
[EM] Chris, DD, 23 March, '05, 0600 GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/22
[EM] Simpson-Kramer
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/22
Re: [EM] publicly acceptability of election methods
Russ Paielli
-
2005/03/22
[EM] Better short definition of voting X over Y. Long definition is official, though.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/22
[EM] Approval's bad-example
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/22
[EM] Kevin--Your method and SDSC
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/22
[EM] Re: Dyadic Weighted Pairwise ( was S/WPO )
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/03/22
[EM] Dyadic Weighted Pairwise ( was S/WPO )
Forest Simmons
-
2005/03/22
Re: [EM] Re: ruminations on ordinal and cardinal information
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/03/22
[EM] Re: Some hard example for Approval Voting
Rob LeGrand
-
2005/03/22
[EM] Re: a name for random ballot from P
Forest Simmons
-
2005/03/22
[EM] ruminations on ordinal and cardinal information
Forest Simmons
-
2005/03/22
[EM] Some hard example for Approval Voting
Jobst Heitzig
-
2005/03/22
[EM] Washington State IRV initiative text
Araucaria Araucana
-
2005/03/22
[EM] Re: a name for random ballot from P
Monkey Puzzle
-
2005/03/22
[EM] Re: ruminations on ordinal and cardinal information
Araucaria Araucana
-
2005/03/22
Re: [EM] winning ratings differentials versus marginal ratings differentials
Jobst Heitzig
-
2005/03/22
Re: [EM] publicly acceptability of election methods
Eric Gorr
-
2005/03/22
[EM] Re: S/WPO
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/03/22
Re: [EM] ruminations on ordinal and cardinal information
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/03/22
Re: [EM] Re: Burying and defection with the "defeat-droppers".
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/03/22
[EM] Simpson-Kramer Method
Markus Schulze
-
2005/03/21
Re: [EM] publicly acceptability of election methods
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/03/21
[EM] Chris, DD
Chris Benham
-
2005/03/21
Re: [EM] publicly acceptability of election methods
Russ Paielli
-
2005/03/21
[EM] Does VFA (Vote For and Against) meet SDSC?
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/03/21
Re: [EM] publicly acceptability of election methods
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/03/21
[EM] Chris, criteria
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/21
[EM] publicly acceptability of election methods
Russ Paielli
-
2005/03/21
[EM] Chris, DD
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/21
[EM] Markus, 22 March, '05, 0400 GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/21
Re: [EM] Truncation incentive with LNHarm (was "Burying and defection")
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/03/21
[EM] 4-candidate CDTT LNHarm failures
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/03/21
Re: [EM] ruminations on ordinal and cardinal information
Russ Paielli
-
2005/03/21
Re: [EM] ruminations on ordinal and cardinal information
Forest Simmons
-
2005/03/21
Re: [EM] ruminations on ordinal and cardinal information
Forest Simmons
-
2005/03/21
[EM] Re: a name for random ballot from P
Forest Simmons
-
2005/03/21
RE: [EM] Re: Ted's DMC proposal
Forest Simmons
-
2005/03/21
RE: [EM] Re: Ted's DMC proposal
Paul Kislanko
-
2005/03/21
[EM] Re: Ted's DMC proposal
Monkey Puzzle
-
2005/03/21
[EM] Ted's DMC proposal
Forest Simmons
-
2005/03/21
[EM] Re: ruminations on ordinal and cardinal information
Araucaria Araucana
-
2005/03/21
[EM] Re: ruminations on ordinal and cardinal information
Jobst Heitzig
-
2005/03/21
Re: [EM] Re: Burying and defection with the "defeat-droppers".
Jobst Heitzig
-
2005/03/21
[EM] Re: ruminations on ordinal and cardinal information
Araucaria Araucana
-
2005/03/21
[EM] Re: Burying and defection with the "defeat-droppers".
Chris Benham
-
2005/03/21
[EM] Re: Burying and defection with the "defeat-droppers".
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/03/21
Re: [EM] Markus, 21 March, '05, 0603 GMT
Markus Schulze
-
2005/03/21
Re: [EM] Who First Proposed Winning Votes?
Markus Schulze
-
2005/03/20
[EM] Re: Chris, equal-ranking incentive
Chris Benham
-
2005/03/20
[EM] Burial and Defection with the "defeat-droppers".
Chris Benham
-
2005/03/20
[EM] AERLO and ATLO definitions
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/20
[EM] Markus, 0633 GMT, 21 March, '05
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/20
[EM] Markus, 21 March, '05, 0603 GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/20
Re: [EM] ruminations on ordinal and cardinal information
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/03/20
[EM] ERIRV doesn't fail your criterion. Netiher does IRV or Plurality.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/20
[EM] S/WPO
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/20
Re: [EM] ruminations on ordinal and cardinal information
Russ Paielli
-
2005/03/20
Re: [EM] Who First Proposed Winning Votes?
Markus Schulze
-
2005/03/20
Re: [EM] Markus, 20 March, 0440 GMT
Markus Schulze
-
2005/03/20
Re: [EM] ruminations on ordinal and cardinal information
Jobst Heitzig
-
2005/03/19
[EM] summary of Condorcet anti-strategy measures
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/03/19
Re: [EM] ruminations on ordinal and cardinal information
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/03/19
[EM] generalization of AERLO/ATLO: S/WPO
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/03/19
[EM] ruminations on ordinal and cardinal information
Russ Paielli
-
2005/03/19
Re: [EM] Kevin, 20 March, '05, 0300
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/03/19
[EM] Markus, 20 March, 0440 GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/19
[EM] Kevin, 0330 GMG, 20 March, '05
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/19
[EM] Kevin, 20 March, '05, 0300
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/19
[EM] we shouldn't call majority rule cycles "ties"
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/03/19
[EM] My voting calculator
Eric Gorr
-
2005/03/19
Re: [EM] Kevin, 19 March, '05, 0330 GMT
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/03/19
[EM] Re: a name for random ballot from P
Jobst Heitzig
-
2005/03/19
Re: [EM] Markus, 19 March, '05, 0230 GMT
Markus Schulze
-
2005/03/18
[EM] Chris, equal-ranking incentive
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/18
[EM] Demonstrations that BeatpathWinner meets WDSC & SFC
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/18
[EM] Kevin, 19 March, '05, 0330 GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/18
[EM] Markus, 19 March, '05, 0230 GMT
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/18
Re: [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/03/18
Re: [EM] Re: majority rule vs. maximum approval (was: least additional votes)
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/03/18
[EM] Re: Definite Majority Choice, first round public proposal (draft)
Araucaria Araucana
-
2005/03/18
[EM] Re: majority rule vs. maximum approval (was: least additional votes)
Forest Simmons
-
2005/03/18
Re: [EM] One more comment on Kevin's example
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/03/18
[EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy
Juho Laatu
-
2005/03/18
[EM] Definite Majority Choice, first round public proposal (draft)
Araucaria Araucana
-
2005/03/18
[EM] Raynaud
Chris Benham
-
2005/03/18
Re: [EM] Least Additional Votes. The importance of strategy.
Eric Gorr
-
2005/03/18
[EM] Re: majority rule vs. maximum approval (was: least additional votes)
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/03/18
Re: [EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/03/18
Re: [EM] Raynaud
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/03/17
Re: [EM] Least Additional Votes. The importance of strategy.
Juho Laatu
-
2005/03/17
[EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy
Juho Laatu
-
2005/03/17
[EM] Re: majority rule, mutinous pirates, and voter strategy
Juho Laatu
-
2005/03/17
Re: [EM] San Francisco IRV Counting rules & possible bad ballots
Eric Gorr
-
2005/03/17
Re: [EM] San Francisco IRV Counting rules & possible bad ballots
Bart Ingles
-
2005/03/17
[EM] One more comment on Kevin's example
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/03/17
[EM] PSA/DMC etc. (was "Re: TSA/DMC, etc.")
Araucaria Araucana
-
2005/03/17
[EM] Dyadic Approval and Bubble Sorted Approval (fwd)
Forest Simmons
-
2005/03/17
[EM] TSA/DMC, etc. (was Total Approval Ranked Pairs)
Forest Simmons