I find Zebra's hypothesis fascinating (regarding the clash of Morphogenetic fields - between Christianity and the "Vedic" M-field) and worthy of investigation; but my tentative conclusion will differ from Zebras: my conjecture - Jesus will eventually be regarded as another "God" but not "GOD" and Christianity will be absorbed within Sanatana Dharma. Worship of the "Gods" (and Buddhas, Bodhisattvas, Yidams, for the Buddhists) is here to stay. ... However, Vaj; your statements go against the grain of much of Buddhism and you make a feeble attempt to skirt the issue of Gods by saying that Buddhists don't worship "Gods". They don't use that word but many Tibetan Buddhists worship physically discarnate entities such as Chenrezig and the Green Tara (and such worship is not entirely for "wisdom"). In essense, you are a phoney Buddhist, a heretic, and a apostate to Buddhism, worthy of being shunned....or worse. ... http://www.scottgbrooks.com/2009_3.html
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <vajradhatu@...> wrote: > > > On Oct 31, 2011, at 2:53 PM, maskedzebra wrote: > > > Robin2: "Full-on aggression". Again a terrible and inaccurate > > characterization of what Barry did when he criticized me. Tell me > > one thing, Curtis (hey, I'm always doing this, n'est-pas?): did > > Barry *ever* say anything by way of criticizing me which indicated > > he was willing to answer to that criticism; that is, stand behind > > it? Did he demonstrate in his silence he was confident about what > > he said such that further discussion was pointless? Barry would > > never get caught in "full-on aggression". I invite him to deal with > > me with "full-on aggression". WTF are you doing here, Curtis? You > > are aiding and abetting Barry in being arrested in his post- > > Frederick Lenz fall-out, something which he does not understand, > > but which he is, in my estimation, a victim of. Don't get it, > > Curtis; don't get it at all. > > (large snippage) > > I think a blindspot you may be missing is that we've seen and > experienced a good number of self-proclaimed TM "enlightened" folks > here already, often acting out in some stereotypical fashion. I > suspect given your own verbosity and long-windedness this simply > highlights the pain we've already experienced here from having to > deal with such individuals. A simple look at one of your posts is > probably enough to set off this type of person. > > I mean I've read the Discovery of Grace and even I cannot bear to > read through your often lengthy posts the whole way. It's like nails > scraping against the akasha. Really, you've changed little from your > early days as a hypomanic over-rounder/writer. I'm not saying this to > be mean, but simply to point out how you may be pushing other > people's buttons without even realizing it. > > You've probably heard the words "those who talk, don't know" but > somehow Lao Tzu was silent on those who cannot STFU. ;-) >
