On Wed, 16 May 2012 00:12:25 -0400 Philip Webb <purs...@ca.inter.net> wrote:
> 120515 Philip Webb wrote: > > 120515 Urs Schutz wrote: > >> I just tried with fotoxx. > >> This is a semi-manual process, but I liked the > >> resulting image. > > I've installed Fotoxx & it does a very good job ! > > >> The joint is less visible than on brum-2.jpg. > > There's no sign of it on my version : > http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~purslow/test/brum-3.jpg > > >> It was easy to do an "unbend" after merging > >> and therefore the clock and the face on the image > >> borders stay in the image. > > They're on my image, but I can't find out how to turn it > into a rectangle. NB there are noticeable curves at the > R-hand edge not in the original: look at the sidewalk > curve & at the building pediment. Any suggestions ? -- > otherwise, this looks like the tool to use. > Transform -> Unbend Image Play with the vertical values, this is very easy, fast and intuitive. With brum-3.jpg the best combination was: vertical linear 5, vertical curved -16, Done and after that Transform -> Trim Image or even easier Transform -> Auto-Trim Image to get rid of the black areas. In the case of brum-3.jpg apply a little bit of Retouch -> Gamma Curves, (bend the left part of the curve a little bit to the bottom, and the right part to the top) to enhance the image contrast. Normally the image looses a little bit of sharpness during the panorama stitching. You can correct this with: Retouch -> Sharpen Image. But: If you would like to make an exhibit, then you get better image quality if you bring the negatives to an old fashioned photographer for direct enlargement on B&W photo paper. Urs