Auke, List:

AvB: Re-action suggests an action, and mediation suggests a mediating act.


My point was that the categories are not what is "acting" in either case.
Again, they simply identify the irreducible elements of whatever is or
could be present to the mind. For example, when we perceive or imagine a
process of mediation (3ns), we can prescind the reactions (2ns) that are
involved in that process, and further prescind the qualities (1ns) that are
involved in those reactions.

Regards,

Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt - twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt

On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 3:12 AM Auke van Breemen <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Jon A. Schmidt,
>
> Op 10 maart 2021 om 2:17 schreef Jon Alan Schmidt <
> [email protected]>:
>
> Edwina, List:
>
> ET: They [the categories] are universal in that their actions don't change
> according to the time, place and what is being organized/formed by these
> categories.
>
> Peirce's categories do not perform "actions" by which they "organize/form"
> anything.
>
> I experience a difference between 'actions of' and 'performing an action'.
> Although 'their function in semiosis does not change', might have been less
> inviting.
>
> You cited Peirce:
>
> "the purest conceptions of them" are phenomenological--namely, "quality,
> reaction, and mediation" (CP 1.530, 1903; cf. CP 4.3, 1898)
>
> --
>
> Re-action suggests an action, and mediation suggests a mediating act.
>
> Best,
>
> Auke van Breemen
>
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON 
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . 
► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] 
with no subject, and with the sole line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of 
the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
► PEIRCE-L is owned by THE PEIRCE GROUP;  moderated by Gary Richmond;  and 
co-managed by him and Ben Udell.

Reply via email to