Markie Mark- After the Republican Obstructionists take control of Congress in January, I predict that very little will get passed. Their primary un-American objective is to make The President of The United States fail. Watch and see.
On 12/23/10, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > Most, yes; and I read it all... as do MOST posters on this forum... except > you. As long as gay equality (NOT rights) is tied to immigration, budget, or > anything else that is slightly distasteful it will NOT pass. > The day it is introduced as a sole and separate issue it will pass. > > > > On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Tommy News <[email protected]> wrote: > >> No, I have not read the entire bill. >> >> Are you aware that most legislation before Congress almost always has >> unrelated amendments and attachments? >> >> On 12/23/10, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Tommy, >> > >> > A simple question..... Have you ever read any of the proposed DOMA >> > repeal >> > legislation and all the "attachments" and "amendments" that have forever >> > been attached to to it ??? >> > >> > If and when....like DADT.... a simple single subject bill to make all >> civil >> > unions equal in every way is put forth it will pass. >> > >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> Tommy, >> >> >> >> Your "list" proves that you never did understand what you are reading. >> >> I >> >> can be free to attack your "ideas" without that attack having anything >> to >> >> do >> >> with you personally. You put yourself forward as "Tommy News" and we >> >> expect >> >> (yet never get) a semblance of neutrality and or objectivity from >> anything >> >> connected with "News"; thus the plays on your chosen moniker. >> >> >> >> As to the Marxist/Socialist claims... Obama made them himself in his >> >> auto-biography. For you to try to dismiss this is absurd. Denial is not >> a >> >> river in Egypt. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Tommy News <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Lil Keithie Kieth >> >>> >> >>> I am very sorry that you are such a homophobic Reich wingnut fascist. >> >>> >> >>> To repeat again, >> >>> >> >>> Don't you believe that when you called me "Asshole" "Moonbat" >> >>> "Marxist" "Socialist" >> >>> "Young Tommy" "Lil Tom Tom" "Ignorant" etc. you were being hateful, >> >>> smearing and hurting me, and lying? >> >>> >> >>> I believe you are telling lies again.You have demonstrated again and >> >>> again that you do NOT hold "beliefs of equality for all" as you >> >>> falsely >> >>> claim. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> You oppose the repeal of DADT, which has ruined thousands of lives and >> >>> careers. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> You oppose the repeal of DOMA, which discriminates against legally >> >>> married same sex couples who only want equal Federal marriage benefits >> >>> such as social security and joint tax returns, etc. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> You oppose Civil Marriage Equality for same sex couples. Civil Unions >> >>> and domestic partnerships are lesser, unequal contracts with fewer >> >>> benefits and rights. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> You oppose UAFA, and favor tearing loving same sex families apart >> >>> through deportation. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> You appear to falsely believe that being gay is a choice and a >> >>> lifestyle, which it is not. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> You believe that all gays are flamboyant chaps wearing cross dressing >> >>> exhibitionist sex fiends, which most are not. Most dress better and >> >>> more conservatively than you do. Many are chaste and celebate. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> You, Keith, by your own admissions, are a prejudiced misguided >> >>> misinformed homophobic Reich wingnut bigot with a dirty mind. Yes, you >> >>> are. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On 12/23/10, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> > LilMarxistMoonbatTommyTomTomForNews, >> >>> > >> >>> > How, or why would you make such a slanderous statement as that? >> >>> > Can >> >>> you >> >>> > point to something that would make you say such a hateful lie and a >> >>> smear >> >>> > against my person? >> >>> > >> >>> > Either point to a post, with the quote, or make an apology. One or >> the >> >>> > other, >> >>> > >> >>> > KeithInTampa >> >>> > >> >>> > On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:09 AM, Tommy News <[email protected]> >> >>> wrote: >> >>> > >> >>> >> Keith does not champion gays as equals. >> >>> >> He sees them as second class citizens. >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> On 12/22/10, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >> > Tommy, >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > Where is the need to champion ANY group when you champion all as >> >>> equals >> >>> >> ?? >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Tommy News < >> [email protected]> >> >>> >> wrote: >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> >> Keith- >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> Although you flippantly state that "Yea, I am an arrogant >> >>> >> >> asshole", >> >>> >> >> you are in fact a misguided homophobe, as you have demonstrated >> >>> >> >> clearly in your anti-gay statements in these groups. >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> I suggest that you make youself a New Year's resolution to >> >>> >> >> become >> >>> >> >> an >> >>> >> >> ally, champion, and advocate for your oppressed gay friends and >> >>> group >> >>> >> >> members, as other Republicans have done. >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> Merry Christmas. >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> On 12/20/10, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >> >> > Hey Wayne! >> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> > How do ya think stereotypes get started? Any truth to them? >> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> > Hey Vince! >> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> > Well, the last thing I wanted to come across as, was >> >>> condescending! >> >>> >> >> > Yea, >> >>> >> >> I >> >>> >> >> > am an arrogant asshole, but usually a pretty friendly asshole! >> >>> Nope, >> >>> >> >> > not >> >>> >> >> > pacifying anyone, ya wanna hear the truth? Come on over and >> >>> >> >> > I >> >>> will >> >>> >> >> > shed >> >>> >> >> > the light for ya! >> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> > Good to see ya, and Merry Christmas! >> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> > KeithInDC >> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> > On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 9:03 PM, vince brackney >> >>> >> >> > <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> >> You know it isn't really worth the effort to get Keith to see >> >>> >> >> >> the >> >>> >> other >> >>> >> >> >> side of the coin. Nothing more condescending than someone who >> >>> claims >> >>> >> >> they >> >>> >> >> >> are not prejudice and then make the statements that he does. >> It >> >>> like >> >>> >> >> >> saying >> >>> >> >> >> I have gay friends so I am not a hater, when really they are >> >>> >> >> >> just >> >>> >> >> >> pacifying >> >>> >> >> >> us. >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> He is really saying these things based on his experience of >> >>> >> >> >> years >> >>> >> ago, >> >>> >> >> and >> >>> >> >> >> I suspect that was before DADT was even in existence. He has >> >>> >> >> >> opinion >> >>> >> >> just >> >>> >> >> >> like everyone else. And everyone has the right to his or hers >> >>> >> >> >> own >> >>> >> >> opinion. >> >>> >> >> >> I >> >>> >> >> >> just wish it wasn't aired in this group. >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> I am very thankful for the straight friends I do have that >> >>> >> >> >> are >> >>> truly >> >>> >> >> >> not >> >>> >> >> >> prejudice and except me for who I am. Wish we had more of >> >>> >> >> >> them >> >>> >> >> >> in >> >>> >> >> >> the >> >>> >> >> >> world. >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 7:26 PM, wayne berry < >> >>> [email protected]> >> >>> >> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> oh god, keith, i love ya! but do not tell me that you really >> >>> can't >> >>> >> see >> >>> >> >> >>> the >> >>> >> >> >>> forest for the trees? >> >>> >> >> >>> heterosexuality represents 90% of the population. in fact if >> i >> >>> am >> >>> >> not >> >>> >> >> >>> carrying a CD by madonna in my rainbow colored purse, no one >> >>> ever >> >>> >> >> >>> suspects >> >>> >> >> >>> i'm gay! no one suspects my husband is bisexual even when he >> >>> says >> >>> >> >> >>> judas >> >>> >> >> >>> priest is his favorite metal band! because most people are >> >>> >> >> >>> straight, >> >>> >> >> the >> >>> >> >> >>> assumption both gays AND straights operate under is that >> >>> >> >> >>> when >> >>> you >> >>> >> meet >> >>> >> >> a >> >>> >> >> >>> man >> >>> >> >> >>> you recognize that odds are pretty good he likes the ladies >> >>> >> >> >>> - >> >>> you >> >>> >> got >> >>> >> >> >>> a >> >>> >> >> 9 >> >>> >> >> >>> in >> >>> >> >> >>> 10 chance and rarely will you be wrong. except when you ARE >> >>> wrong. >> >>> >> >> >>> stereotypes exist because in any group you can name there >> >>> >> >> >>> are >> >>> often >> >>> >> >> >>> people >> >>> >> >> >>> who fit certain ideas that are recognized - some jews ARE >> >>> >> >> >>> cheap, >> >>> >> some >> >>> >> >> >>> white >> >>> >> >> >>> people ARE incredibly "uptight", some gays DO prefer flowers >> to >> >>> >> >> >>> football... >> >>> >> >> >>> but within any stereotype there are plenty enough >> >>> >> >> >>> dissonances >> >>> >> >> >>> to >> >>> >> >> >>> reveal >> >>> >> >> a >> >>> >> >> >>> stereotype for what it is... a careless and casual painting >> of >> >>> >> >> >>> a >> >>> >> large >> >>> >> >> >>> group >> >>> >> >> >>> of people as being all the same, when indeed none of us are. >> >>> >> >> >>> no one has to say they are straight because there are so >> >>> >> >> >>> many >> >>> >> >> >>> of >> >>> >> >> >>> you >> >>> >> >> that >> >>> >> >> >>> you can scarcely imagine people who are not like you. >> >>> >> >> >>> my jobs in kitchens are not as regimented as the military, >> yet >> >>> >> there's >> >>> >> >> >>> still a certain amount of macho involved in the job! but >> >>> >> >> >>> here >> >>> >> >> >>> is >> >>> >> >> >>> the >> >>> >> >> >>> thing... in all but the most antiseptic atmospheres, someone >> is >> >>> >> gonna >> >>> >> >> ask >> >>> >> >> >>> you about your life outside the job. and there is nothing >> that >> >>> >> sounds >> >>> >> >> >>> worse >> >>> >> >> >>> than saying you don't have a girlfriend or a wife or even >> just >> >>> some >> >>> >> >> girl >> >>> >> >> >>> you >> >>> >> >> >>> bang now and again, than saying, "oh, i'm sorry i don't talk >> >>> about >> >>> >> >> >>> personal >> >>> >> >> >>> stuff like that." or weirder if you constantly avoid the >> >>> question. >> >>> >> >> >>> when >> >>> >> >> >>> there is no penalty for telling the truth you are much less >> >>> >> >> >>> a >> >>> freak >> >>> >> >> when >> >>> >> >> >>> you >> >>> >> >> >>> answer truthfully, "well, no i don't have a wife or a >> >>> girlfriend... >> >>> >> >> >>> i'm >> >>> >> >> >>> gay >> >>> >> >> >>> and i have a husband/boyfriend... ' or even, "i'm not seeing >> >>> anyone >> >>> >> >> >>> 'special' right now, but i'm doing OK, if ya catch my >> >>> >> >> >>> drift." >> >>> >> >> >>> i mean on one hand being gay informs a lot of my life (my >> >>> >> >> >>> tastes >> >>> >> >> >>> are >> >>> >> >> >>> somewhat different from yours, observably, aren't they?) but >> in >> >>> the >> >>> >> >> most >> >>> >> >> >>> mundane aspects of life - the need for personal connection, >> the >> >>> >> >> >>> need >> >>> >> >> >>> to >> >>> >> >> >>> eat, >> >>> >> >> >>> the need to have some sort of meaning in your work? it's the >> >>> same >> >>> >> for >> >>> >> >> >>> a >> >>> >> >> >>> straight guy as a gay guy. >> >>> >> >> >>> i really can't understand your need to cling to a fairly >> >>> outdated >> >>> >> >> concept >> >>> >> >> >>> of what a gay man is when you are the moderator of a group >> that >> >>> >> gives >> >>> >> >> you >> >>> >> >> >>> every evidence of a gay men who are far from those >> >>> >> >> >>> stereotypical >> >>> >> >> >>> pictures. >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >>> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Keith In Tampa >> >>> >> >> >>> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >>>> Hello Mustang! Good to see ya! >> >>> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>>> First, I knew, when I wrote my initial missive, that there >> >>> would >> >>> >> >> >>>> be >> >>> >> >> >>>> at >> >>> >> >> >>>> least one thinking, "common sense" kinda guy (<Grin!!> >> >>> asshole!!) >> >>> >> >> >>>> who >> >>> >> >> >>>> would >> >>> >> >> >>>> call me on my last missive! Touche'! >> >>> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>>> It is in fact a hard concept that I was attempting to >> frame, >> >>> and >> >>> >> >> >>>> you >> >>> >> >> >>>> are correct....Sort of. >> >>> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>>> Yes, as I stated, the military cultivates a "Macho" image, >> and >> >>> it >> >>> >> is >> >>> >> >> >>>> hard >> >>> >> >> >>>> to not separate the Macho Man who is the ladies' man. This >> is >> >>> in >> >>> >> >> direct >> >>> >> >> >>>> conflict with my statement that the military does not allow >> >>> >> >> >>>> for >> >>> >> those >> >>> >> >> >>>> who >> >>> >> >> >>>> wear their sexual identity on their sleeve. >> >>> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>>> There are a number of men in the military who do in fact >> play >> >>> the >> >>> >> >> >>>> "cassanova" role. I will admit that to a degree, this is a >> >>> double >> >>> >> >> >>>> standard >> >>> >> >> >>>> and in conflict with my premise. >> >>> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>>> Having said that, in my 53 years, I have yet to meet a >> >>> >> Heterosexual, >> >>> >> >> who >> >>> >> >> >>>> identifies himself as a, "Heterosexual". That his whole >> life >> >>> >> >> >>>> revolves >> >>> >> >> >>>> around being, "Heterosexual". His politics; his social >> >>> >> >> >>>> life; >> >>> >> his >> >>> >> >> >>>> mannerisms; his diet; his wardrobe; his decor; his >> passions, >> >>> >> likes, >> >>> >> >> >>>> dislikes, hatreds, loves, and yes, sexual appetite, are all >> >>> >> >> >>>> defined >> >>> >> >> >>>> by >> >>> >> >> >>>> his >> >>> >> >> >>>> "Straightness". >> >>> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>>> Please point this/these individual(s) out to me. >> >>> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>>> Therein lies the distinction, and no, nothing about the >> repeal >> >>> of >> >>> >> >> >>>> DADT >> >>> >> >> >>>> will change the rejection by the United States Military on >> >>> >> >> >>>> this >> >>> >> >> >>>> one >> >>> >> >> >>>> major >> >>> >> >> >>>> issue, of Gay men or women who choose to defend our Nation. >> >>> Just >> >>> >> >> >>>> like >> >>> >> >> >>>> their >> >>> >> >> >>>> straight counterparts, they cannot and will not be able to >> >>> >> broadcast >> >>> >> >> >>>> their >> >>> >> >> >>>> sexual proclivities, as is done so much in the Gay >> community, >> >>> and >> >>> >> >> maybe >> >>> >> >> >>>> in >> >>> >> >> >>>> some Heterosexual social circles; (Like the >> >>> >> >> >>>> Nudist/Swapping >> >>> >> crews). >> >>> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>>> KeithInDC >> >>> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>>> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 12:33 AM, Mustang < >> >>> [email protected] >> >>> >> >> >wrote: >> >>> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>>>> Keith, >> >>> >> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> >> >>>>> While I agree with many, if not most, things you say we >> >>> disagree >> >>> >> on >> >>> >> >> >>>>> a >> >>> >> >> >>>>> couple. This being one of them. >> >>> >> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> >> >>>>> "The military does not allow for ANYONE, and this will >> >>> >> >> >>>>> include >> >>> >> >> >>>>> heterosexuals as well as homosexuals, to wear their >> sexuality >> >>> >> >> >>>>> openly, >> >>> >> >> >>>>> or to >> >>> >> >> >>>>> broadcast their sexual likes or dislikes publicly. >> >>> >> >> >>>>> " >> >>> >> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> >> >>>>> Heterosexuals already do wear their sexuality preference >> >>> openly. >> >>> >> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> >> >>>>> Are you saying that everyone will suddenly be forbidden >> >>> >> >> >>>>> any >> >>> >> >> opportunity >> >>> >> >> >>>>> to display or even have pictures of their family and >> friends? >> >>> No >> >>> >> >> >>>>> one >> >>> >> >> >>>>> will >> >>> >> >> >>>>> be allowed to admit they write, call, or discuss any >> >>> >> communications >> >>> >> >> >>>>> with >> >>> >> >> >>>>> their wives, husbands, girlfriends or boyfriends? No one >> >>> >> >> >>>>> will >> >>> be >> >>> >> >> >>>>> allowed to >> >>> >> >> >>>>> talk about how things are going at home or plans after >> >>> discharge? >> >>> >> >> >>>>> While on >> >>> >> >> >>>>> leave, no one can invite a male or female military friend >> to >> >>> >> >> >>>>> spend >> >>> >> >> the >> >>> >> >> >>>>> Holidays with a spouse, or to openly have two Dads or two >> >>> Moms? >> >>> >> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> >> >>>>> The Israeli military has not gone to hell in a hand >> >>> >> >> >>>>> basket. >> >>> They >> >>> >> >> have >> >>> >> >> >>>>> no problem with both genders or gay people being drafted >> and >> >>> then >> >>> >> >> >>>>> working >> >>> >> >> >>>>> cohesively. It's the same as acceptance of blacks and >> women >> >>> was >> >>> >> >> >>>>> decades >> >>> >> >> >>>>> ago. Much ado about nothing. I am certain our military >> will >> >>> be >> >>> >> >> >>>>> able >> >>> >> >> >>>>> to >> >>> >> >> >>>>> keep their minds focused on the tasks assigned. Anyone >> >>> >> >> >>>>> who >> >>> >> >> >>>>> is >> >>> >> >> >>>>> qualified >> >>> >> >> >>>>> should have the right to apply to defend our nation. >> >>> >> >> >>>>> Absolute >> >>> >> 100% >> >>> >> >> >>>>> heterosexuality should not be a requirement. Nothing will >> >>> >> >> >>>>> change. >> >>> >> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> >> >>>>> Mustang >> >>> >> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> >> >>>>> Bigotry disguised as morality is still bigotry just as an >> >>> >> >> >>>>> outhouse >> >>> >> >> with >> >>> >> >> >>>>> marble columns is still an outhouse. - D.A. Ridgely >> (whomever >> >>> he >> >>> >> is) >> >>> >> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> >> >>>>> ------------------------------ >> >>> >> >> >>>>> *From:* Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> >> >>> >> >> >>>>> *To:* [email protected] >> >>> >> >> >>>>> *Sent:* Sun, December 19, 2010 9:18:24 AM >> >>> >> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> >> >>>>> *Subject:* Re: [Historical Pictorial] Victory! Senate >> Repeals >> >>> >> ‘Don’t >> >>> >> >> >>>>> Ask, Don’t Tell’, Despite 31 Republican No Votes and John >> >>> >> >> >>>>> McCain's >> >>> >> >> >>>>> Fillibuster Attempt >> >>> >> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> >> >>>>> No question, I see this issue from a different perspective >> >>> than I >> >>> >> >> >>>>> believe most do here in HP. >> >>> >> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> >> >>>>> I don't see the DADT repeal as being all that significant, >> >>> >> >> >>>>> and >> >>> >> >> although >> >>> >> >> >>>>> I agree with Rob and his assessment, I also think that >> >>> >> >> >>>>> there >> >>> is >> >>> >> a >> >>> >> >> >>>>> major >> >>> >> >> >>>>> component to all of this, that Rob, or anyone else in the >> >>> group >> >>> >> has >> >>> >> >> >>>>> touched >> >>> >> >> >>>>> upon. >> >>> >> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> >> >>>>> The military does not allow for ANYONE, and this will >> include >> >>> >> >> >>>>> heterosexuals as well as homosexuals, to wear their >> sexuality >> >>> >> >> >>>>> openly, >> >>> >> >> >>>>> or to >> >>> >> >> >>>>> broadcast their sexual likes or dislikes publicly. In >> other >> >>> >> words, >> >>> >> >> NO >> >>> >> >> >>>>> ONE >> >>> >> >> >>>>> in the military can be or will be identified by their >> sexual >> >>> >> >> >>>>> proclivities or >> >>> >> >> >>>>> sexual identification, which is a common factor in the Gay >> >>> >> >> >>>>> community. >> >>> >> >> >>>>> This >> >>> >> >> >>>>> is where so many in the Gay community are mistaken. >> >>> >> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> >> >>>>> The military will boot out a service member who is an >> >>> >> >> >>>>> admitted >> >>> >> >> >>>>> adulterer. Service members who are into any type of >> >>> >> >> >>>>> sado-masochistic activities and make them public will be >> >>> >> >> >>>>> summarily >> >>> >> >> >>>>> discharged. Those service members who are into "swinging" >> >>> >> >> >>>>> and >> >>> >> have >> >>> >> >> >>>>> multiple >> >>> >> >> >>>>> sexual partners, and who make that aspect of their lives >> >>> public, >> >>> >> >> >>>>> will >> >>> >> >> >>>>> be >> >>> >> >> >>>>> shown the door and discharged. All branches of the >> >>> >> >> >>>>> service >> >>> >> will >> >>> >> >> not >> >>> >> >> >>>>> condone any member who bases his or her lifestyle upon >> their >> >>> >> sexual >> >>> >> >> >>>>> identiy. >> >>> >> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> >> >>>>> Nothng has changed. >> >>> >> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> >> >>>>> Just as important, the military does in fact have and >> embrace >> >>> a >> >>> >> >> "Macho" >> >>> >> >> >>>>> image. This is requisite for combat. Yes, there are women >> in >> >>> the >> >>> >> >> >>>>> service >> >>> >> >> >>>>> but not in combat arms. The lifestyle is tough, rugged and >> >>> most >> >>> >> >> >>>>> of >> >>> >> >> the >> >>> >> >> >>>>> time >> >>> >> >> >>>>> uncomfortable. The stereotypical Gay male will not be >> >>> condoned. >> >>> >> The >> >>> >> >> >>>>> combat >> >>> >> >> >>>>> units of the Army and Marines are all male and all the >> males >> >>> talk >> >>> >> >> about >> >>> >> >> >>>>> doing their girl friends as they charge the enemy with >> cigars >> >>> >> >> >>>>> hanging >> >>> >> >> >>>>> out >> >>> >> >> >>>>> their mouths; not penises. This is the image that our >> >>> military >> >>> >> >> >>>>> cultivates. It is good for morale, it is good for unit >> >>> >> >> >>>>> cohesiveness, >> >>> >> >> >>>>> and >> >>> >> >> >>>>> most importantly, it is but one component of what makes >> >>> >> >> >>>>> our >> >>> >> military >> >>> >> >> >>>>> the >> >>> >> >> >>>>> mightiest in the world. Again, this image is not going >> >>> >> >> >>>>> to >> >>> >> change. >> >>> >> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> >> >>>>> -- >> >>> >> >> >>>>> Thanks for participating in the Google Group, Historical >> >>> >> Pictorial, >> >>> >> >> >>>>> which is the premiere men's forum on the web; focusing on >> >>> >> historical >> >>> >> >> >>>>> media, >> >>> >> >> >>>>> and discussions of contemporary issues as well as our >> >>> chronicled >> >>> >> >> past! >> >>> >> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> >> >>>>> For options and help, please visit the group at: >> >>> >> >> >>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/Historical-Pictoral >> >>> >> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> >> >>>>> -- >> >>> >> >> >>>>> Thanks for participating in the Google Group, Historical >> >>> >> Pictorial, >> >>> >> >> >>>>> which is the premiere men's forum on the web; focusing on >> >>> >> historical >> >>> >> >> >>>>> media, >> >>> >> >> >>>>> and discussions of contemporary issues as well as our >> >>> chronicled >> >>> >> >> past! >> >>> >> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> >> >>>>> For options and help, please visit the group at: >> >>> >> >> >>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/Historical-Pictoral >> >>> >> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>>> -- >> >>> >> >> >>>> Thanks for participating in the Google Group, Historical >> >>> >> >> >>>> Pictorial, >> >>> >> >> >>>> which >> >>> >> >> >>>> is the premiere men's forum on the web; focusing on >> historical >> >>> >> media, >> >>> >> >> >>>> and >> >>> >> >> >>>> discussions of contemporary issues as well as our >> >>> >> >> >>>> chronicled >> >>> past! >> >>> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>>> For options and help, please visit the group at: >> >>> >> >> >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/Historical-Pictoral >> >>> >> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >>> -- >> >>> >> >> >>> - wayne. >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >>> goto> http://waynes-nude-musicians.blogspot.com/ >> >>> >> >> >>> http://blueguitar.tumblr.com/ >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >>> -- >> >>> >> >> >>> Thanks for participating in the Google Group, Historical >> >>> Pictorial, >> >>> >> >> which >> >>> >> >> >>> is the premiere men's forum on the web; focusing on >> historical >> >>> >> media, >> >>> >> >> and >> >>> >> >> >>> discussions of contemporary issues as well as our chronicled >> >>> past! >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >>> For options and help, please visit the group at: >> >>> >> >> >>> http://groups.google.com/group/Historical-Pictoral >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> -- >> >>> >> >> >> Thanks for participating in the Google Group, Historical >> >>> Pictorial, >> >>> >> >> which >> >>> >> >> >> is the premiere men's forum on the web; focusing on >> >>> >> >> >> historical >> >>> >> >> >> media, >> >>> >> >> and >> >>> >> >> >> discussions of contemporary issues as well as our chronicled >> >>> past! >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> For options and help, please visit the group at: >> >>> >> >> >> http://groups.google.com/group/Historical-Pictoral >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> > -- >> >>> >> >> > Thanks for participating in the Google Group, Historical >> >>> Pictorial, >> >>> >> >> > which >> >>> >> >> is >> >>> >> >> > the premiere men's forum on the web; focusing on historical >> >>> >> >> > media, >> >>> >> >> > and >> >>> >> >> > discussions of contemporary issues as well as our chronicled >> >>> >> >> > past! >> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> > For options and help, please visit the group at: >> >>> >> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/Historical-Pictoral >> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> -- >> >>> >> >> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time. >> >>> >> >> Have a great day, >> >>> >> >> Tommy >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> -- >> >>> >> >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >> >>> >> >> For options & help see >> >>> http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> * Visit our other community at >> >>> >> >> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/> >> >>> >> >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >> >>> >> >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > -- >> >>> >> > Mark M. Kahle H. >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > -- >> >>> >> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >> >>> >> > For options & help see >> http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > * Visit our other community at >> >>> >> > http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/> >> >>> >> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >> >>> >> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> -- >> >>> >> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time. >> >>> >> Have a great day, >> >>> >> Tommy >> >>> >> >> >>> >> -- >> >>> >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >> >>> >> For options & help see >> http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >> >>> >> >> >>> >> * Visit our other community at >> >>> >> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/> >> >>> >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >> >>> >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >> >>> >> >> >>> > >> >>> > -- >> >>> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >> >>> > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >> >>> > >> >>> > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >> >>> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >> >>> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time. >> >>> Have a great day, >> >>> Tommy >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >> >>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >> >>> >> >>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >> >>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >> >>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Mark M. Kahle H. >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Mark M. Kahle H. >> > >> > -- >> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >> > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >> > >> > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >> >> >> -- >> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time. >> Have a great day, >> Tommy >> >> -- >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >> >> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >> > > > > -- > Mark M. Kahle H. > > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -- Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time. Have a great day, Tommy -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
