No, I have not read the entire bill. Are you aware that most legislation before Congress almost always has unrelated amendments and attachments?
On 12/23/10, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > Tommy, > > A simple question..... Have you ever read any of the proposed DOMA repeal > legislation and all the "attachments" and "amendments" that have forever > been attached to to it ??? > > If and when....like DADT.... a simple single subject bill to make all civil > unions equal in every way is put forth it will pass. > > > > On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Tommy, >> >> Your "list" proves that you never did understand what you are reading. I >> can be free to attack your "ideas" without that attack having anything to >> do >> with you personally. You put yourself forward as "Tommy News" and we >> expect >> (yet never get) a semblance of neutrality and or objectivity from anything >> connected with "News"; thus the plays on your chosen moniker. >> >> As to the Marxist/Socialist claims... Obama made them himself in his >> auto-biography. For you to try to dismiss this is absurd. Denial is not a >> river in Egypt. >> >> >> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Tommy News <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Lil Keithie Kieth >>> >>> I am very sorry that you are such a homophobic Reich wingnut fascist. >>> >>> To repeat again, >>> >>> Don't you believe that when you called me "Asshole" "Moonbat" >>> "Marxist" "Socialist" >>> "Young Tommy" "Lil Tom Tom" "Ignorant" etc. you were being hateful, >>> smearing and hurting me, and lying? >>> >>> I believe you are telling lies again.You have demonstrated again and >>> again that you do NOT hold "beliefs of equality for all" as you falsely >>> claim. >>> >>> >>> You oppose the repeal of DADT, which has ruined thousands of lives and >>> careers. >>> >>> >>> You oppose the repeal of DOMA, which discriminates against legally >>> married same sex couples who only want equal Federal marriage benefits >>> such as social security and joint tax returns, etc. >>> >>> >>> You oppose Civil Marriage Equality for same sex couples. Civil Unions >>> and domestic partnerships are lesser, unequal contracts with fewer >>> benefits and rights. >>> >>> >>> You oppose UAFA, and favor tearing loving same sex families apart >>> through deportation. >>> >>> >>> You appear to falsely believe that being gay is a choice and a >>> lifestyle, which it is not. >>> >>> >>> You believe that all gays are flamboyant chaps wearing cross dressing >>> exhibitionist sex fiends, which most are not. Most dress better and >>> more conservatively than you do. Many are chaste and celebate. >>> >>> >>> You, Keith, by your own admissions, are a prejudiced misguided >>> misinformed homophobic Reich wingnut bigot with a dirty mind. Yes, you >>> are. >>> >>> >>> >>> On 12/23/10, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > LilMarxistMoonbatTommyTomTomForNews, >>> > >>> > How, or why would you make such a slanderous statement as that? Can >>> you >>> > point to something that would make you say such a hateful lie and a >>> smear >>> > against my person? >>> > >>> > Either point to a post, with the quote, or make an apology. One or the >>> > other, >>> > >>> > KeithInTampa >>> > >>> > On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:09 AM, Tommy News <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> >> Keith does not champion gays as equals. >>> >> He sees them as second class citizens. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> On 12/22/10, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> > Tommy, >>> >> > >>> >> > Where is the need to champion ANY group when you champion all as >>> equals >>> >> ?? >>> >> > >>> >> > On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Tommy News <[email protected]> >>> >> wrote: >>> >> > >>> >> >> Keith- >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Although you flippantly state that "Yea, I am an arrogant >>> >> >> asshole", >>> >> >> you are in fact a misguided homophobe, as you have demonstrated >>> >> >> clearly in your anti-gay statements in these groups. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> I suggest that you make youself a New Year's resolution to become >>> >> >> an >>> >> >> ally, champion, and advocate for your oppressed gay friends and >>> group >>> >> >> members, as other Republicans have done. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Merry Christmas. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> On 12/20/10, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> >> > Hey Wayne! >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > How do ya think stereotypes get started? Any truth to them? >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > Hey Vince! >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > Well, the last thing I wanted to come across as, was >>> condescending! >>> >> >> > Yea, >>> >> >> I >>> >> >> > am an arrogant asshole, but usually a pretty friendly asshole! >>> Nope, >>> >> >> > not >>> >> >> > pacifying anyone, ya wanna hear the truth? Come on over and I >>> will >>> >> >> > shed >>> >> >> > the light for ya! >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > Good to see ya, and Merry Christmas! >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > KeithInDC >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 9:03 PM, vince brackney >>> >> >> > <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> You know it isn't really worth the effort to get Keith to see >>> >> >> >> the >>> >> other >>> >> >> >> side of the coin. Nothing more condescending than someone who >>> claims >>> >> >> they >>> >> >> >> are not prejudice and then make the statements that he does. It >>> like >>> >> >> >> saying >>> >> >> >> I have gay friends so I am not a hater, when really they are >>> >> >> >> just >>> >> >> >> pacifying >>> >> >> >> us. >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> He is really saying these things based on his experience of >>> >> >> >> years >>> >> ago, >>> >> >> and >>> >> >> >> I suspect that was before DADT was even in existence. He has >>> >> >> >> opinion >>> >> >> just >>> >> >> >> like everyone else. And everyone has the right to his or hers >>> >> >> >> own >>> >> >> opinion. >>> >> >> >> I >>> >> >> >> just wish it wasn't aired in this group. >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> I am very thankful for the straight friends I do have that are >>> truly >>> >> >> >> not >>> >> >> >> prejudice and except me for who I am. Wish we had more of them >>> >> >> >> in >>> >> >> >> the >>> >> >> >> world. >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 7:26 PM, wayne berry < >>> [email protected]> >>> >> >> wrote: >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> oh god, keith, i love ya! but do not tell me that you really >>> can't >>> >> see >>> >> >> >>> the >>> >> >> >>> forest for the trees? >>> >> >> >>> heterosexuality represents 90% of the population. in fact if i >>> am >>> >> not >>> >> >> >>> carrying a CD by madonna in my rainbow colored purse, no one >>> ever >>> >> >> >>> suspects >>> >> >> >>> i'm gay! no one suspects my husband is bisexual even when he >>> says >>> >> >> >>> judas >>> >> >> >>> priest is his favorite metal band! because most people are >>> >> >> >>> straight, >>> >> >> the >>> >> >> >>> assumption both gays AND straights operate under is that when >>> you >>> >> meet >>> >> >> a >>> >> >> >>> man >>> >> >> >>> you recognize that odds are pretty good he likes the ladies - >>> you >>> >> got >>> >> >> >>> a >>> >> >> 9 >>> >> >> >>> in >>> >> >> >>> 10 chance and rarely will you be wrong. except when you ARE >>> wrong. >>> >> >> >>> stereotypes exist because in any group you can name there are >>> often >>> >> >> >>> people >>> >> >> >>> who fit certain ideas that are recognized - some jews ARE >>> >> >> >>> cheap, >>> >> some >>> >> >> >>> white >>> >> >> >>> people ARE incredibly "uptight", some gays DO prefer flowers to >>> >> >> >>> football... >>> >> >> >>> but within any stereotype there are plenty enough dissonances >>> >> >> >>> to >>> >> >> >>> reveal >>> >> >> a >>> >> >> >>> stereotype for what it is... a careless and casual painting of >>> >> >> >>> a >>> >> large >>> >> >> >>> group >>> >> >> >>> of people as being all the same, when indeed none of us are. >>> >> >> >>> no one has to say they are straight because there are so many >>> >> >> >>> of >>> >> >> >>> you >>> >> >> that >>> >> >> >>> you can scarcely imagine people who are not like you. >>> >> >> >>> my jobs in kitchens are not as regimented as the military, yet >>> >> there's >>> >> >> >>> still a certain amount of macho involved in the job! but here >>> >> >> >>> is >>> >> >> >>> the >>> >> >> >>> thing... in all but the most antiseptic atmospheres, someone is >>> >> gonna >>> >> >> ask >>> >> >> >>> you about your life outside the job. and there is nothing that >>> >> sounds >>> >> >> >>> worse >>> >> >> >>> than saying you don't have a girlfriend or a wife or even just >>> some >>> >> >> girl >>> >> >> >>> you >>> >> >> >>> bang now and again, than saying, "oh, i'm sorry i don't talk >>> about >>> >> >> >>> personal >>> >> >> >>> stuff like that." or weirder if you constantly avoid the >>> question. >>> >> >> >>> when >>> >> >> >>> there is no penalty for telling the truth you are much less a >>> freak >>> >> >> when >>> >> >> >>> you >>> >> >> >>> answer truthfully, "well, no i don't have a wife or a >>> girlfriend... >>> >> >> >>> i'm >>> >> >> >>> gay >>> >> >> >>> and i have a husband/boyfriend... ' or even, "i'm not seeing >>> anyone >>> >> >> >>> 'special' right now, but i'm doing OK, if ya catch my drift." >>> >> >> >>> i mean on one hand being gay informs a lot of my life (my >>> >> >> >>> tastes >>> >> >> >>> are >>> >> >> >>> somewhat different from yours, observably, aren't they?) but in >>> the >>> >> >> most >>> >> >> >>> mundane aspects of life - the need for personal connection, the >>> >> >> >>> need >>> >> >> >>> to >>> >> >> >>> eat, >>> >> >> >>> the need to have some sort of meaning in your work? it's the >>> same >>> >> for >>> >> >> >>> a >>> >> >> >>> straight guy as a gay guy. >>> >> >> >>> i really can't understand your need to cling to a fairly >>> outdated >>> >> >> concept >>> >> >> >>> of what a gay man is when you are the moderator of a group that >>> >> gives >>> >> >> you >>> >> >> >>> every evidence of a gay men who are far from those >>> >> >> >>> stereotypical >>> >> >> >>> pictures. >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Keith In Tampa >>> >> >> >>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>>> Hello Mustang! Good to see ya! >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> First, I knew, when I wrote my initial missive, that there >>> would >>> >> >> >>>> be >>> >> >> >>>> at >>> >> >> >>>> least one thinking, "common sense" kinda guy (<Grin!!> >>> asshole!!) >>> >> >> >>>> who >>> >> >> >>>> would >>> >> >> >>>> call me on my last missive! Touche'! >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> It is in fact a hard concept that I was attempting to frame, >>> and >>> >> >> >>>> you >>> >> >> >>>> are correct....Sort of. >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> Yes, as I stated, the military cultivates a "Macho" image, and >>> it >>> >> is >>> >> >> >>>> hard >>> >> >> >>>> to not separate the Macho Man who is the ladies' man. This is >>> in >>> >> >> direct >>> >> >> >>>> conflict with my statement that the military does not allow >>> >> >> >>>> for >>> >> those >>> >> >> >>>> who >>> >> >> >>>> wear their sexual identity on their sleeve. >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> There are a number of men in the military who do in fact play >>> the >>> >> >> >>>> "cassanova" role. I will admit that to a degree, this is a >>> double >>> >> >> >>>> standard >>> >> >> >>>> and in conflict with my premise. >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> Having said that, in my 53 years, I have yet to meet a >>> >> Heterosexual, >>> >> >> who >>> >> >> >>>> identifies himself as a, "Heterosexual". That his whole life >>> >> >> >>>> revolves >>> >> >> >>>> around being, "Heterosexual". His politics; his social >>> >> >> >>>> life; >>> >> his >>> >> >> >>>> mannerisms; his diet; his wardrobe; his decor; his passions, >>> >> likes, >>> >> >> >>>> dislikes, hatreds, loves, and yes, sexual appetite, are all >>> >> >> >>>> defined >>> >> >> >>>> by >>> >> >> >>>> his >>> >> >> >>>> "Straightness". >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> Please point this/these individual(s) out to me. >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> Therein lies the distinction, and no, nothing about the repeal >>> of >>> >> >> >>>> DADT >>> >> >> >>>> will change the rejection by the United States Military on >>> >> >> >>>> this >>> >> >> >>>> one >>> >> >> >>>> major >>> >> >> >>>> issue, of Gay men or women who choose to defend our Nation. >>> Just >>> >> >> >>>> like >>> >> >> >>>> their >>> >> >> >>>> straight counterparts, they cannot and will not be able to >>> >> broadcast >>> >> >> >>>> their >>> >> >> >>>> sexual proclivities, as is done so much in the Gay community, >>> and >>> >> >> maybe >>> >> >> >>>> in >>> >> >> >>>> some Heterosexual social circles; (Like the Nudist/Swapping >>> >> crews). >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> KeithInDC >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 12:33 AM, Mustang < >>> [email protected] >>> >> >> >wrote: >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>>> Keith, >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>> While I agree with many, if not most, things you say we >>> disagree >>> >> on >>> >> >> >>>>> a >>> >> >> >>>>> couple. This being one of them. >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>> "The military does not allow for ANYONE, and this will >>> >> >> >>>>> include >>> >> >> >>>>> heterosexuals as well as homosexuals, to wear their sexuality >>> >> >> >>>>> openly, >>> >> >> >>>>> or to >>> >> >> >>>>> broadcast their sexual likes or dislikes publicly. >>> >> >> >>>>> " >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>> Heterosexuals already do wear their sexuality preference >>> openly. >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>> Are you saying that everyone will suddenly be forbidden any >>> >> >> opportunity >>> >> >> >>>>> to display or even have pictures of their family and friends? >>> No >>> >> >> >>>>> one >>> >> >> >>>>> will >>> >> >> >>>>> be allowed to admit they write, call, or discuss any >>> >> communications >>> >> >> >>>>> with >>> >> >> >>>>> their wives, husbands, girlfriends or boyfriends? No one >>> >> >> >>>>> will >>> be >>> >> >> >>>>> allowed to >>> >> >> >>>>> talk about how things are going at home or plans after >>> discharge? >>> >> >> >>>>> While on >>> >> >> >>>>> leave, no one can invite a male or female military friend to >>> >> >> >>>>> spend >>> >> >> the >>> >> >> >>>>> Holidays with a spouse, or to openly have two Dads or two >>> Moms? >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>> The Israeli military has not gone to hell in a hand basket. >>> They >>> >> >> have >>> >> >> >>>>> no problem with both genders or gay people being drafted and >>> then >>> >> >> >>>>> working >>> >> >> >>>>> cohesively. It's the same as acceptance of blacks and women >>> was >>> >> >> >>>>> decades >>> >> >> >>>>> ago. Much ado about nothing. I am certain our military will >>> be >>> >> >> >>>>> able >>> >> >> >>>>> to >>> >> >> >>>>> keep their minds focused on the tasks assigned. Anyone who >>> >> >> >>>>> is >>> >> >> >>>>> qualified >>> >> >> >>>>> should have the right to apply to defend our nation. >>> >> >> >>>>> Absolute >>> >> 100% >>> >> >> >>>>> heterosexuality should not be a requirement. Nothing will >>> >> >> >>>>> change. >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>> Mustang >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>> Bigotry disguised as morality is still bigotry just as an >>> >> >> >>>>> outhouse >>> >> >> with >>> >> >> >>>>> marble columns is still an outhouse. - D.A. Ridgely (whomever >>> he >>> >> is) >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>> ------------------------------ >>> >> >> >>>>> *From:* Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> >>> >> >> >>>>> *To:* [email protected] >>> >> >> >>>>> *Sent:* Sun, December 19, 2010 9:18:24 AM >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>> *Subject:* Re: [Historical Pictorial] Victory! Senate Repeals >>> >> ‘Don’t >>> >> >> >>>>> Ask, Don’t Tell’, Despite 31 Republican No Votes and John >>> >> >> >>>>> McCain's >>> >> >> >>>>> Fillibuster Attempt >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>> No question, I see this issue from a different perspective >>> than I >>> >> >> >>>>> believe most do here in HP. >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>> I don't see the DADT repeal as being all that significant, >>> >> >> >>>>> and >>> >> >> although >>> >> >> >>>>> I agree with Rob and his assessment, I also think that >>> >> >> >>>>> there >>> is >>> >> a >>> >> >> >>>>> major >>> >> >> >>>>> component to all of this, that Rob, or anyone else in the >>> group >>> >> has >>> >> >> >>>>> touched >>> >> >> >>>>> upon. >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>> The military does not allow for ANYONE, and this will include >>> >> >> >>>>> heterosexuals as well as homosexuals, to wear their sexuality >>> >> >> >>>>> openly, >>> >> >> >>>>> or to >>> >> >> >>>>> broadcast their sexual likes or dislikes publicly. In other >>> >> words, >>> >> >> NO >>> >> >> >>>>> ONE >>> >> >> >>>>> in the military can be or will be identified by their sexual >>> >> >> >>>>> proclivities or >>> >> >> >>>>> sexual identification, which is a common factor in the Gay >>> >> >> >>>>> community. >>> >> >> >>>>> This >>> >> >> >>>>> is where so many in the Gay community are mistaken. >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>> The military will boot out a service member who is an >>> >> >> >>>>> admitted >>> >> >> >>>>> adulterer. Service members who are into any type of >>> >> >> >>>>> sado-masochistic activities and make them public will be >>> >> >> >>>>> summarily >>> >> >> >>>>> discharged. Those service members who are into "swinging" >>> >> >> >>>>> and >>> >> have >>> >> >> >>>>> multiple >>> >> >> >>>>> sexual partners, and who make that aspect of their lives >>> public, >>> >> >> >>>>> will >>> >> >> >>>>> be >>> >> >> >>>>> shown the door and discharged. All branches of the >>> >> >> >>>>> service >>> >> will >>> >> >> not >>> >> >> >>>>> condone any member who bases his or her lifestyle upon their >>> >> sexual >>> >> >> >>>>> identiy. >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>> Nothng has changed. >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>> Just as important, the military does in fact have and embrace >>> a >>> >> >> "Macho" >>> >> >> >>>>> image. This is requisite for combat. Yes, there are women in >>> the >>> >> >> >>>>> service >>> >> >> >>>>> but not in combat arms. The lifestyle is tough, rugged and >>> most >>> >> >> >>>>> of >>> >> >> the >>> >> >> >>>>> time >>> >> >> >>>>> uncomfortable. The stereotypical Gay male will not be >>> condoned. >>> >> The >>> >> >> >>>>> combat >>> >> >> >>>>> units of the Army and Marines are all male and all the males >>> talk >>> >> >> about >>> >> >> >>>>> doing their girl friends as they charge the enemy with cigars >>> >> >> >>>>> hanging >>> >> >> >>>>> out >>> >> >> >>>>> their mouths; not penises. This is the image that our >>> military >>> >> >> >>>>> cultivates. It is good for morale, it is good for unit >>> >> >> >>>>> cohesiveness, >>> >> >> >>>>> and >>> >> >> >>>>> most importantly, it is but one component of what makes our >>> >> military >>> >> >> >>>>> the >>> >> >> >>>>> mightiest in the world. Again, this image is not going to >>> >> change. >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>> -- >>> >> >> >>>>> Thanks for participating in the Google Group, Historical >>> >> Pictorial, >>> >> >> >>>>> which is the premiere men's forum on the web; focusing on >>> >> historical >>> >> >> >>>>> media, >>> >> >> >>>>> and discussions of contemporary issues as well as our >>> chronicled >>> >> >> past! >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>> For options and help, please visit the group at: >>> >> >> >>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/Historical-Pictoral >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>> -- >>> >> >> >>>>> Thanks for participating in the Google Group, Historical >>> >> Pictorial, >>> >> >> >>>>> which is the premiere men's forum on the web; focusing on >>> >> historical >>> >> >> >>>>> media, >>> >> >> >>>>> and discussions of contemporary issues as well as our >>> chronicled >>> >> >> past! >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>> For options and help, please visit the group at: >>> >> >> >>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/Historical-Pictoral >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> -- >>> >> >> >>>> Thanks for participating in the Google Group, Historical >>> >> >> >>>> Pictorial, >>> >> >> >>>> which >>> >> >> >>>> is the premiere men's forum on the web; focusing on historical >>> >> media, >>> >> >> >>>> and >>> >> >> >>>> discussions of contemporary issues as well as our chronicled >>> past! >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> For options and help, please visit the group at: >>> >> >> >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/Historical-Pictoral >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> -- >>> >> >> >>> - wayne. >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> goto> http://waynes-nude-musicians.blogspot.com/ >>> >> >> >>> http://blueguitar.tumblr.com/ >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> -- >>> >> >> >>> Thanks for participating in the Google Group, Historical >>> Pictorial, >>> >> >> which >>> >> >> >>> is the premiere men's forum on the web; focusing on historical >>> >> media, >>> >> >> and >>> >> >> >>> discussions of contemporary issues as well as our chronicled >>> past! >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> For options and help, please visit the group at: >>> >> >> >>> http://groups.google.com/group/Historical-Pictoral >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> -- >>> >> >> >> Thanks for participating in the Google Group, Historical >>> Pictorial, >>> >> >> which >>> >> >> >> is the premiere men's forum on the web; focusing on historical >>> >> >> >> media, >>> >> >> and >>> >> >> >> discussions of contemporary issues as well as our chronicled >>> past! >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> For options and help, please visit the group at: >>> >> >> >> http://groups.google.com/group/Historical-Pictoral >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > -- >>> >> >> > Thanks for participating in the Google Group, Historical >>> Pictorial, >>> >> >> > which >>> >> >> is >>> >> >> > the premiere men's forum on the web; focusing on historical >>> >> >> > media, >>> >> >> > and >>> >> >> > discussions of contemporary issues as well as our chronicled >>> >> >> > past! >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > For options and help, please visit the group at: >>> >> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/Historical-Pictoral >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> -- >>> >> >> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time. >>> >> >> Have a great day, >>> >> >> Tommy >>> >> >> >>> >> >> -- >>> >> >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>> >> >> For options & help see >>> http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>> >> >> >>> >> >> * Visit our other community at >>> >> >> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/> >>> >> >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>> >> >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>> >> >> >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > -- >>> >> > Mark M. Kahle H. >>> >> > >>> >> > -- >>> >> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>> >> > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>> >> > >>> >> > * Visit our other community at >>> >> > http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/> >>> >> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>> >> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time. >>> >> Have a great day, >>> >> Tommy >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>> >> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>> >> >>> >> * Visit our other community at >>> >> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/> >>> >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>> >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>> >> >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>> > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>> > >>> > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >>> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time. >>> Have a great day, >>> Tommy >>> >>> -- >>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>> >>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Mark M. Kahle H. >> >> > > > -- > Mark M. Kahle H. > > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -- Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time. Have a great day, Tommy -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
