Hmm, I see the argument between the researcher (William) who wants to *use* sympow, and the code porter (David) who wants to *port* sympow.
I think I will remain on the fence on this one, pull up a chair, grab a beer from the fridge..... :-) On 17 Aug, 01:31, "Dr. David Kirkby" <david.kir...@onetel.net> wrote: > On 08/17/10 12:24 AM, William Stein wrote: > > > I would rather have a windows port than not having a Windows port. > > Problems may be created as a result. But since Cephes is only used > > on Windows, the problems will be less than the current problem which > > is that Sage doesn't work at all on Windows. > > I think Peter Jeremy is intending using Cephes on FreeBSD. I think there will > be > more people willing and able to debug Cephes than SYMPOW. > > To maintain SYMPOW, you need a skill set very few people process. > > Dave -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
