On 08/17/10 01:59 AM, Bill Hart wrote:
Hmm, I see the argument between the researcher (William) who wants to
*use* sympow, and the code porter (David) who wants to *port* sympow.
I think I will remain on the fence on this one, pull up a chair, grab
a beer from the fridge..... :-)
Bill,
If it was a case of porting sympow, I would just get on and do it. I've got
countless other packages working on Solaris by sorting out portability issues.
But SYMPOW's problems extend far beyond portability issues. That's just the tip
of the iceberg. Take a look at the source code, and you will see what I mean.
Dave
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
