Re: Spell Checker

[Christopher J. Trybowski]

On Tuesday, September 14, 1999 Steve Lamb wrote:

> Templates   should  be  just  that,  templates.  Place  holders  for
> information to be filled in later. They should not be filled in with
> optional  information  like  whether  or  not  to sign and encrypt a
> message, whether or not to drop the Re: counter and so on.
> 
> I  am  talking options, in general, being shuffled into the template
> system,  in general. That is at all of the template levels: account,
> folder, group and single-address.

I  agree  with  you. But using templates is useful in conjunction with
"Quick Templates" and their shortcuts...

-- 
Christopher J. Trybowski
http://wil.linux.krakow.pl/~trybik
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
UIN: 4350719 / IRC: trybik / tel.: +48 (12) 648 24 17
---
PGP keys: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=send_key
PGP keys' IDs: 0xB92EEE69 (RSA); 0x9382700B (DH/DSS)
---
Using The Bat! 1.36 Beta/1 [reg]
under Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998  



-- 
--
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, click below and send the generated message.

--

Re: Spell checker

[Ian Gore]

On Wednesday, October 13, 1999, 10:27:35 AM, Christian wrote:

> There should be an option for the spell checker to ignore signature
> lines (below "-- ").

Why? You can add the "misspelled" strings to the dictionary and that
way they wont be flagged anywhere. As an added bonus, if you use those
strings elsewhere but get them wrong, they will be flagged.

-- 

Cheers

Ian G.

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team click here:
   
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, click below and send the generated message.
   
--

Re: Spell checker

[Steve Lamb]

Wednesday, October 13, 1999, 3:04:28 AM, Ian wrote:
> Why? You can add the "misspelled" strings to the dictionary and that
> way they wont be flagged anywhere. As an added bonus, if you use those
> strings elsewhere but get them wrong, they will be flagged.

Adding misspelled strings to the dictionary just means you could miss
legit problems in the body.  TB! is smart enough to remove properly formed
sigs so the recognition is there.

-- 
 Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
 ICQ: 5107343  | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
---+-

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team click here:
   
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, click below and send the generated message.
   
--

Re: Spell checker

[Steve Lamb]

Thursday, October 14, 1999, 12:25:35 AM, Ian wrote:
>> TB! is smart enough to remove properly formed sigs so the
>> recognition is there.

> What constitutes a "properly formed sig"? The spell checker doesn't
> take any notice of the "-- " delimiter.

Anything that follows the "-- \n" signature delimiter.  Of course the
spell checker doesn't notice it.  I believe that is why the person who started
this thread suggested that it *should* recognize it and ignore anything past
it.

-- 
 Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
 ICQ: 5107343  | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
---+-

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team click here:
   
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, click below and send the generated message.
   
--

Re: spell checker

[Allie Martin]

Roland Burger, [RB] wrote:

RB> what can be the matter that I don't have automatic spell
RB> checker?

If you're using the Windows plain text or HTML editor, then the
autochecker doesn't work. It will only work with MicroEd.

RB> I have installed intpack.msi, What is OKB and where I can get it?

I pass on this second question.

-- 
-=[ Allie ]=- (List Moderator and fellow end-user)

PGPKeys: http://key.ac-martin.com
Running The Bat! v2.11.02 on WinXP Pro (SP1) 


pgpPzE39QRMqL.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: spell checker

[Roland Burger]

Hi Allie,

on Fri, 4 Jun 2004 05:17:38 -0500 GMT (which was Friday, June 4, 2004,
12:17 where I live) Allie Martin wrote in message
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] among others:

> Roland Burger, [RB] wrote:

RB>> what can be the matter that I don't have automatic spell
RB>> checker?

> If you're using the Windows plain text or HTML editor, then the
> autochecker doesn't work. It will only work with MicroEd.

But with MicroEd I cannot see from quick templates the Polish characters in Mails! I 
therefore have set it to Plain Text (Windows) - Windows-compatible, proportional 
fonts! But this, however, don't work with the templates in the addressbook!

I think, that Ritlabs must do there something!

PS.: I have now tried it with MicroEd, but I also didn't find 
 automatic spell checker and the languages also are not those 
 mentioned with intpack.exe!

RB>> I have installed intpack.msi, What is OKB and where I can get it?

> I pass on this second question.

-- 
Best regards,
Roland   mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

PGP-Key: 0x0D023C45 (DH/DSS)
Homepage: http://www.rolandburger.de

I use The Bat! v2.11.02 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1!



Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Spell checker

[Allie Martin]

On Friday, October 29, 2004, at 10:22 AM, Tony wrote:

> Maybe it was in a dream but I remember the spell checker suggesting to
> splitting up words.  For example when I typed "spellchecker" it
> suggested "spell checker" Or "mailserver" "mail server"

> Was I dreaming or fully awake?  

No, you weren't dreaming since I got a number of those suggestions just
today.

-- 
-=[ Allie ]=-
... To err is human. To blame someone else is politics.
__
Running TB! v3.0.2.2 Rush or SquirrelMail WebMail for IMAP
IMAP Server: MDaemon Pro | OS: Windows XP Pro (Service Pack 2)



Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Spell checker

[MAU]

Hello Allie,

>> Maybe it was in a dream but I remember the spell checker suggesting to
>> splitting up words.  For example when I typed "spellchecker" it
>> suggested "spell checker" Or "mailserver" "mail server"
> 
>> Was I dreaming or fully awake?  
> 
> No, you weren't dreaming since I got a number of those suggestions just
> today.

It doesn't not work with CSAPI, only with normal TB dictionaries.
However, for this to work, in Spell Checker/Options you must select
"Suggest split words".

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.3 Rush





Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Spell checker

[MFPA]

Hi

On Friday, 29 October, 2004, at 7:59:12 PM, MAU wrote:

> Hello Allie,

>>> Maybe it was in a dream but I remember the spell checker suggesting to
>>> splitting up words.  For example when I typed "spellchecker" it
>>> suggested "spell checker" Or "mailserver" "mail server"
>> 
>>> Was I dreaming or fully awake?  
>> 
>> No, you weren't dreaming since I got a number of those suggestions just
>> today.

> It doesn't not work with CSAPI, only with normal TB dictionaries.
> However, for this to work, in Spell Checker/Options you must select
> "Suggest split words".

I get very odd suggestions for "spellchecker", including
"Seychelles" and "belched". I am using "British English, yet I also
get "paycheck" (which should be "pay cheque").

-- 
Best regards,
 
MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1



Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Spell checker

[Tony]

Hello MFPA,

Sunday, October 31, 2004, 4:49:33 AM, you wrote:


M> Hi

M> On Friday, 29 October, 2004, at 7:59:12 PM, MAU wrote:

>> Hello Allie,

 Maybe it was in a dream but I remember the spell checker suggesting to
 splitting up words.  For example when I typed "spellchecker" it
 suggested "spell checker" Or "mailserver" "mail server"
>>> 
 Was I dreaming or fully awake?  
>>> 
>>> No, you weren't dreaming since I got a number of those suggestions just
>>> today.

>> It doesn't not work with CSAPI, only with normal TB dictionaries.
>> However, for this to work, in Spell Checker/Options you must select
>> "Suggest split words".

M> I get very odd suggestions for "spellchecker", including
M> "Seychelles" and "belched". I am using "British English,
I get those suggestions too but only under 'suggest more'
'suggest more' almost works like  an anagram solver :)

M> yet I also
M> get "paycheck" (which should be "pay cheque").

According to my paper dictionary it should be paycheck.
Also according this on-line dictionary http://www.m-w.com/

For my level of English the spell checker comes close to perfection.
I hope RitLabs is also considering grammar checking.
I've seen it in MS Word. It's far from perfect but does detect a fair
number of errors.

-- 
Best regards,
Tony

Trucks of a local plumbing company in NE Pennsylvania: Don't sleep with a drip call 
your plumber.



Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Spell checker

[MFPA]

Hi

On Sunday, 31 October, 2004, at 7:00:32 AM, Tony wrote:


M>> I get very odd suggestions for "spellchecker", including
M>> "Seychelles" and "belched". I am using "British English,
> I get those suggestions too but only under 'suggest more'
> 'suggest more' almost works like  an anagram solver :)

I was getting them without using "suggest more" unless I selected
"Suggest split words".

M>> yet I also
M>> get "paycheck" (which should be "pay cheque").

> According to my paper dictionary it should be paycheck.
> Also according this on-line dictionary http://www.m-w.com/

Mirriam-Webster Online is an _American_ dictionary.

http://www.freesearch.co.uk/dictionary defines "paycheck" as "noun
{C} US FOR pay packet"

> For my level of English the spell checker comes close to perfection.

It's probably ok for somebody whose first language is not English.
The "British English" spellchecker was suggesting Americanisation
of so many correctly spelt English words that I had to install an
alternative dictionary file in order to use it.

> I hope RitLabs is also considering grammar checking.
> I've seen it in MS Word.

But not in Outlook Express. You could copy/paste from a word
processor into an email client.

> It's far from perfect

Definitely.

> but does detect a fair number of errors.

And also regularly suggests changing perfectly clear, correctly
constructed sentences into complete nonsense.

-- 
Best regards,
 
MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1



Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Spell checker?

[Roelof Otten]

Hallo Phillip,

On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 17:50:39 -0400GMT (15-4-2005, 23:50 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:

KVS> I know I will feel like an idiot... but I cannot find the spell
KVS> checker /anywhere/ What am I missing?

In the editor there's a 'Spell Checker' in the menu.

KVS> --

Your signature delimiter is missing its trailing space...

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

Mr. Bullfrog says: Time is fun when you're having flies.

The Bat! 3.0.9.15 Return
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
1 pop3 account, server on LAN



pgpLaJjhDoVTF.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Spell checker?

[Phillip P Rutherford II]

what menu item is it under? I am not seeing it :(

On 4/15/05, Roelof Otten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hallo Phillip,
> 
> On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 17:50:39 -0400GMT (15-4-2005, 23:50 +0200, where I
> live), you wrote:
> 
> KVS> I know I will feel like an idiot... but I cannot find the spell
> KVS> checker /anywhere/ What am I missing?
> 
> In the editor there's a 'Spell Checker' in the menu.
> 
> KVS> --
> 
> Your signature delimiter is missing its trailing space...
> 
> --
> Groetjes, Roelof
> 
> Mr. Bullfrog says: Time is fun when you're having flies.
> 
> The Bat! 3.0.9.15 Return
> Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
> 1 pop3 account, server on LAN
> 
> 
> 
> Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
> http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
> 
> 
> 


--


Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Spell Checker

[Roelof Otten]

Hallo Edgar,

On Sat, 4 Oct 2003 11:25:14 +0200GMT (4-10-03, 11:25 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:

E> I send my mails in English and Dutch, and have the Spell Checker set
E> to scan the mail before sending them.

So do I. I select the language for the spell checker with this macro:
%language="AM" or %language="NL"
Since the template you're using is already set in the correct
language, it's easy to have it include the correct language for the
spell checker too.

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof



Current version is 2.00.6 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Spell Checker

[Ochrid]

Hello Edgar,

Saturday, October 4, 2003, 11:25:14 AM, you wrote:

E> Is there a way to let him select the right
E> language automatically?

You can set a language per addressee (and also per
group, I think) by adding a line to the template.

For instance:
%LANGUAGE='FR' in the new message template will
make sure the spelling is checked in French.

For other languages and more explanation, look
here:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/howdoi.html and
look under macro's.


-- 

Regards,
Ochrid 
 
_ The Bat! vs 2.0 op Windows XP _



Current version is 2.00.6 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Spell Checker

[Dierk Haasis]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Andriy!

On Thursday, September 13, 2001 at 10:28:50 AM you wrote:

> Where did Spell Checker disappear in The Bat new versions ?

Nowhere to, it is still here with me.


- --
Dierk Haasis
http://www.Write4U.de

PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys

The Bat 1.54 Beta/8 on Windows 95 4.0 1212 C

Wer sich nicht verbiegen läßt, zerbricht! (Aleks Papst)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8ckt
Comment: Privacy is the core element to Freedom!

iQA/AwUBO6BkX/To1oA8g8dLEQKcsgCgq3bGcwUgsvdVkHZszXty1AgCzPUAnj6p
1D0MEUlkZquLYtkCprXAhLd1
=/Z5V
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d

Re: spell checker

[David Elliott]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Dierk

On 15 September 2001 at 14:43:32 +0200 (which was 13:43 where I live) Dierk
Haasis emanated these words of wisdom

DH> Either i have missed something, or it doesn't work correct: When I  have
DH> a word underlined with a squared line, I can't just double-click  or hit
DH>  to correct it.

It works here by double clicking the other (left) mouse button (The one that
usually brings up the menu. The enter does not work for me.

DH> And I found out that sometimes the underlining seems to go rampant. I
DH> had some normal underlining, but only one word was in the context menu.
DH> And I had words underlined with square lines, which came up with a
DH> plethora of words.

Not confirmed but the underlining is not always in on the correct line.
This was a bug that I reported to Tbbeta about a year ago.

DH> What are the exact options and steps to be done to get the immediate
DH> correction by double-clicking (or what ever is needed)?

I hope the above helps.

- --

 Bye,  ___
  David   |   SecureBat!  1.53s/iKey1000  | E-mailaholics |
 _|  Win 2K Server  5.0.2195 SP2  | International |
| Preparing an ambush, I sight-in with my <<>> missle, and wait.  |

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP Cyber-Knights Templar 6.5.8ckt (build 06)
Comment: PGP Signed, sealed, delivered.

iQA/AwUBO6NPPfmK8eZlD0U0EQJcIACgzyDRyUnIHK8H+mQGrd5an9NmTf0An3sv
OlKTYl7oUvvOWV4I34BU40Ub
=rdPv
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d

Re: spell checker

[Dierk Haasis]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello David!

On Saturday, September 15, 2001 at 2:53:16 PM you wrote:

> It works here by double clicking the other (left) mouse button (The one that
> usually brings up the menu. The enter does not work for me.

Dou, that's the one - I was always clicking the wrong button.
sometimes I really feel like Homer Simpson ...

> I hope the above helps.

Yes, and I am just testing. Do you see the word "clicking" above? I
had a typo in it - "clickingb", it was underlined normally, but when I
called up the context menu I had only one word to choose from.

Could that have anything to do with any option in the spell checker
dialogue? I have checked case-sensitive, Auto-correct, Typographical
suggestions, Suggest split words and Fast, less accurate. Although I
just found out that TB! had set that back to its default Middle some
time ago.



- --
Dierk Haasis
http://www.Write4U.de

PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys

The Bat 1.54 Beta/8 on Windows 95 4.0 1212 C

Absurdity: A statement of belief manifestly inconsistent with one's
own opinion. (Ambrose Bierce)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8ckt
Comment: Privacy is the core element to Freedom!

iQA/AwUBO6NJqvTo1oA8g8dLEQIg4QCg182oXpb7J5NZ5nvue5R/nt0L4PUAnRyv
835sr2EdZG9ODV99OzIV0Qbk
=JrF7
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d

Re: spell checker

[Dierk Haasis]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello David!

On Sunday, September 16, 2001 at 12:53:48 PM you wrote:

> Doing an RTFM.

Rest assured, you don't ...

> The key here is "commonly misspelt words", 'teh' is a common misspelling
> whilst 'clickingb' is not.

In one of the messages on this issue this information was not
included. Actually I remember someone writing that it works when only
one suggestion is available.

Thanks for clarifying!


- --
Dierk Haasis
http://www.Write4U.de

PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys

The Bat 1.54 Beta/8 on Windows 95 4.0 1212 C

I never criticize my friends; if they are true friends they shall be
what they be. (Derek Leveret)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8ckt
Comment: Privacy is the core element to Freedom!

iQA/AwUBO6SQv/To1oA8g8dLEQIZlACfRE1gAqrx3ex4wu/cRt4/TOwKjqsAnjJ/
o+lzlPmaX97vXLb3yBxsvXwl
=DvDH
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d

Re: spell checker

[Dierk Haasis]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello David!

On Sunday, September 16, 2001 at 3:44:31 PM you wrote:

> I went and Read The Fine Manual.

Sorry, got you wrong on the abbrev. ;-)


- --
Dierk Haasis
http://www.Write4U.de

PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys

The Bat 1.54 Beta/8 on Windows 95 4.0 1212 C

Why is lemon juice made with artificial flavour, and dish washing
liquid made with real lemons?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8ckt
Comment: Privacy is the core element to Freedom!

iQA/AwUBO6Si7fTo1oA8g8dLEQKurwCgl1CWwy0n6RXnNXE40yJ4alIKleIAoMQb
LBNM6VWUNQ88Ve/1oH0pBdCK
=B1JH
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d

Re: spell checker

[Januk Aggarwal]

Hello David,

On Sunday, September 16, 2001 at 11:53 GMT +0100, a creature mimicking
David Elliott [DE] wrote:

DE> The key here is "commonly misspelt words", 'teh' is a common misspelling
DE> whilst 'clickingb' is not.

There is a dictionary with auto-correct words.  You can add/remove
entries to suit your needs.  On my system, it is the correct.tlx
dictionary that has the auto-correct words, but it looks like you can
add words to any dictionary.

-- 
Thanks for writing,
 Januk Aggarwal

Using The Bat! 1.54 Beta/8 under Windows 98 4.10 Build  A

This almost blank page was intentional.


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d

Re: Spell Checker

[Jernej Simonèiè]

Hello Ricardo,

15. april 2002, 20:51:27, you wrote:

RMR> Is there a way to set a different default dictionary for each
RMR> account (or even better, for each folder), so I don't have to select
RMR> the right one each time I start a message ?

There is the %language macro.

-- 
Jernej Simoncic, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www2.arnes.si/~sopjsimo/
ICQ: 26266467

[The Bat! v1.60d on Windows 98 4.10.. A ]

Ideal goals grow faster than the means of attaining new goals allow.
   -- Wober's SNIDE Rule (Satisfied Needs Incite Demand Excesses)



Current Ver: 1.60c
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Spell Checker

[wired]

ON Monday, April 15, 2002, 8:51:27 PM, you wrote:


RMR> Is there a way to set a different default dictionary for each
RMR> account (or even better, for each folder), so I don't have to select
RMR> the right one each time I start a message ?

Hi Ricardo,

You could always try folder templates but that is a very risky way to
solve it. I have found that the best way to do this is to add people per
language in a addressbook and have addressbook specific templates.

What we really need is a language flag in the address book per entry.
I hope this doesn't fall of the RIT Labs wish list.

-- 
Best regards,
 Gerard 

Insert Cookie Here--> Reality? That's where the pizza delivery guy comes from! 


 Using The Bat! v1.60c on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2



Current Ver: 1.60c
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Spell Checker

[Miguel A. Urech]

Hello Ricardo,

> I rarely use those translations, because usually they are really
> awful or incomplete, specially for those of us who don't speak the
> Spanish from Spain.

I think I've never used the Spanish interface myself, so I can't
really tell:

> Is there a way to set a different default dictionary for each
> account (or even better, for each folder), so I don't have to select
> the right one each time I start a message ?

As others have pointed out, you can use the %LANGUAGE macro in
templates, whether they are account, folder or AB ones. I have some
set up but, most of the time I use two Quick Templates I have:

SP which includes %LANGUAGE="SP"
BR which includes %LANGUAGE="BR"

That way, at any time while writing a message (it doesn't have to be
the first thing you do) I can type SP or BR followed by Ctrl+
to switch from one language to the other.

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.60c



Current Ver: 1.60c
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Spell Checker

[Miguel A. Urech]

Hello wired,

> What we really need is a language flag in the address book per entry.
> I hope this doesn't fall of the RIT Labs wish list.

There is not a perfect solution for everyone. Whether it is templates
or flags in the AB, I have a number of people in my AB to whom I may
write in Spanish or English depending on other people I may CC or if
it is a business or private message.

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.60c



Current Ver: 1.60c
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Spell Checker Oddity ?

[Fred Weissman]

> I have "auto correct" enabled, and if I see a word that's been underlined
> because of a spelling error, but decide not to add the word to my User's
> Dictionary... or correct it, and choose "Ignore All"... if I happen to
> type the word again, the Spell Checker will underline it yet again, as if
> to ignore it's own "Ignore All" feature?

That behavior is similar to the spell checker in MSWord, among others.

"Ignore All" as I understand it, tells the checker to ignore all occurrences
of that word for -this- message (or use) only.  Since it's not being added
to the user dictionary, it will flag it as unknown/incorrect the next
time the spell checker is called into action.

HTH.

-- 
I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not
sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]www.phred.net/~phred

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   
--

Re: Spell Checker Oddity ?

[Nick Andriash]

On Tuesday, January 25, 2000, 1:54:34 PM, Nick Andriash wrote:

> I have "auto correct" enabled

A clarification on the above statement... I have "Automatic Checking"
enabled, as "Auto Correct" doesn't work for me, and never has.



Nick

-- 
-=Nick Andriash=-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Keys available from KeyServers
---

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   
--

Re: Spell Checker Oddity ?

[Nick Andriash]

On Tuesday, January 25, 2000, 2:09:00 PM, Fred Weissman wrote:

> "Ignore All" as I understand it, tells the checker to ignore all occurrences
> of that word for -this- message (or use) only.  Since it's not being added
> to the user dictionary, it will flag it as unknown/incorrect the next
> time the spell checker is called into action.

That's correct Fred... although TB's Spell Checker doesn't ignore all
future occurrences of the word in that one message... it keeps on flagging
them for some reason. Do you use Auto Correct? If so, what's the secret to
enabling it, other than the obvious option of turning it on via Spell
Checker/Options/Auto Correct? I've taken a look at the Correct.tlx
Dictionary, and it's full of words, so I would imagine it's loaded on my
install... just not useable?

Nick

-- 
-=Nick Andriash=-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Keys available from KeyServers
---

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   
--

Re: Spell Checker Oddity ?

[Fred Weissman]

> On Tuesday, January 25, 2000, 1:54:34 PM, Nick Andriash wrote:

>> I have "auto correct" enabled

> A clarification on the above statement... I have "Automatic Checking"
> enabled, as "Auto Correct" doesn't work for me, and never has.

Good point.
I can't find anything in the help file that states exactly what 'auto
correct' is -supposed- to do.
Because now that you mention it, I'm not so sure it's doing anything right
now.

Clarification anyone?

-- 
No matter how good your market research may be, I assure you that I am
not interested in your product. Don't add me to your mailing
list and don't ask me to "simply reply to remove myself".
Just leave me alone.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]www.phred.net/~phred

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   
--

Re: Spell Checker Oddity ?

[Fred Weissman]

> On Tuesday, January 25, 2000, 2:09:00 PM, Fred Weissman wrote:

>> "Ignore All" as I understand it, tells the checker to ignore all occurrences
>> of that word for -this- message (or use) only.  Since it's not being added
>> to the user dictionary, it will flag it as unknown/incorrect the next
>> time the spell checker is called into action.

> That's correct Fred... although TB's Spell Checker doesn't ignore all
> future occurrences of the word in that one message... it keeps on flagging
> them for some reason. Do you use Auto Correct? If so, what's the secret to
> enabling it, other than the obvious option of turning it on via Spell
> Checker/Options/Auto Correct? I've taken a look at the Correct.tlx
> Dictionary, and it's full of words, so I would imagine it's loaded on my
> install... just not useable?

Hmmm ... I just played around with a few things and I do think we've
discovered a bug.  Oops, e, I mean an undocumented negative feature.
First off, under 'spell checker' from the edit window, I have 'automatic
checking' enabled.  Under options, I have 'auto correct' enabled.

I just wrote typed the word "wrong" incorrectly three times:
wrng wrng wrng

At first they were flagged as incorrect.  I right-clicked on one of them
and selected 'ignore all' and the red line did not disappear.  Then I
opened up the actual spell checker window by right-clicking one of the
incorrect words and selecting 'suggest more'.  I then selected 'ignore all'
and the red line disappeared.  I deleted them, and retyped them again, and
they are not flagged now.  I opened up a new message window and typed
in 'wrng' and it was not flagged.  Then I closed Bat completely and
reopened it.  I typed 'wrng' again, and now it is flagged.  BUT the three
'wrng' above, and not flagged.

Methinks the right-click version of 'ignore all' isn't connected to
anything.  IOW, it doesn't work.  And I hope the guys at RIT are reading
this.

I know this doesn't solve your problem, but it certainly confirms that
something is wrng.  Oops ... I mean wrong.

-- 
Judging from realistic simulations involving a sledge hammer and a
common laboratory frog, if a huge asteroid hits the earth we can
assume it will be pretty bad.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]www.phred.net/~phred

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   
--

Re: Spell Checker Oddity ?

[Nick Andriash]

On Wednesday, January 26, 2000, 7:15:11 AM, Fred Weissman wrote:

> Methinks the right-click version of 'ignore all' isn't connected to
> anything.  IOW, it doesn't work.  And I hope the guys at RIT are reading
> this.

I sent off a letter yesterday to RIT Research Labs about the problem...
for me, it's one of the only weak points about the Editor I can find, but
an important one as I don't want to employ an external Spell Checker.

Nick

-- 
-=Nick Andriash=-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Keys available from KeyServers
---

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   
--

Re: Spell Checker Oddity ?

[Nick Andriash]

On Wednesday, January 26, 2000, 7:19:26 AM, Fred Weissman wrote:

> I can't find anything in the help file that states exactly what 'auto
> correct' is -supposed- to do.
> Because now that you mention it, I'm not so sure it's doing anything right
> now.

Fred, it's supposed to automatically correct common mistyping's ;o) such
as Febuary... in which case, as soon as you are finished the word _and_
the word exists in the correct.tlx Dictionary, then the word would/should
automatically be corrected to February for you without the user having to
do anything. Very nice!

And on a final note... you are absolutely correct... that feature isn't
working at the moment, but hopefully I'll hear back from RIT Labs with a
plan to resolve the problem.

Nick

-- 
-=Nick Andriash=-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Keys available from KeyServers
---

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   
--

Re: Spell Checker Oddity ?

[Nick Danger]

In Reference to "Spell Checker Oddity ?" From Nick Andriash:

NA> Fred, it's supposed to automatically correct common mistyping's ;o) such
NA> as Febuary... in which case, as soon as you are finished the word _and_
NA> the word exists in the correct.tlx Dictionary, then the word would/should
NA> automatically be corrected to February for you without the user having to
NA> do anything.

It's there, just quirky.  If you type Febuary you'll notice a more
squared off underline than the usual zigzag type for misspelling. For
those words a double right click will "auto correct".  I think there
is also a keyboard shortcut but what it is alludes me at the moment.

HTH

-- 
- Nick

Nick Danger's Complimentary Curse <(©¿©)>:
May an imaginary number of lackluster forest rangers take a wicked dump on your stove.

Using The Bat! 1.39
 under Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998  



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   
--

Re: Spell Checker Oddity ?

[Allie Martin]

On Wed, 26 Jan 2000 08:38:10 -0800, Nick Andriash wrote:

==8<
> Fred, it's supposed to automatically correct common mistyping's ;o) such
> as Febuary... in which case, as soon as you are finished the word _and_
> the word exists in the correct.tlx Dictionary, then the word would/should
> automatically be corrected to February for you without the user having to
> do anything. Very nice!

> And on a final note... you are absolutely correct... that feature isn't
> working at the moment, but hopefully I'll hear back from RIT Labs with a
> plan to resolve the problem.

I see under the spellchecker menu, an option for automatic checking. Where's
this autochecking option? I don't see it anywhere. :-/

-- 
-=Allie=- | Using The Bat! v1.39
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  | Windows NT4.0 (Service Pack 6)
--†-
[ Black Holes are Out of Sight ]


-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   
--

Re: Spell Checker Oddity ?

[Fred Weissman]

> In Reference to "Spell Checker Oddity ?" From Nick Andriash:

NA>> Fred, it's supposed to automatically correct common mistyping's ;o) such
NA>> as Febuary... in which case, as soon as you are finished the word _and_
NA>> the word exists in the correct.tlx Dictionary, then the word would/should
NA>> automatically be corrected to February for you without the user having to
NA>> do anything.

> It's there, just quirky.  If you type Febuary you'll notice a more
> squared off underline than the usual zigzag type for misspelling. For
> those words a double right click will "auto correct".  I think there
> is also a keyboard shortcut but what it is alludes me at the moment.

AH HAH!

I've noticed that 'different' underline and never realized why.
Thanks.
And yes, a double-right-click does auto correct it.
But that's not exactly -auto- in my mind.  Auto should mean no user
intervention.

When (if) you get an answer from RIT, would you mind forwarding it to me,
as the traffic here is getting to the point where I'm barely skimming the
subject headers.

Thanks again.

-- 
Please grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change; the
courage to change the things I can; and the wisdom to hide the
bodies of those people I had to kill because they pissed me off.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]www.phred.net/~phred

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   
--

Re: Spell Checker Oddity ?

[Nick Andriash]

On Wednesday, January 26, 2000, 10:13:28 AM, Allie Martin wrote:

> I see under the spellchecker menu, an option for automatic checking. Where's
> this autochecking option? I don't see it anywhere. :-/

Well the option is invoked if you simply choose the option off the Spell
Checker Menu, and becomes the default unless you un-check it... you'll
notice if you choose it, it puts a check mark next to it.


Nick

-- 
-=Nick Andriash=-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Keys available from KeyServers
---

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   
--

Re: Spell Checker Oddity ?

[Nick Andriash]

On Tuesday, January 26, 1999, 8:54:45 AM, Nick Danger wrote:

> It's there, just quirky.  If you type Febuary you'll notice a more
> squared off underline than the usual zigzag type for misspelling. For
> those words a double right click will "auto correct".  I think there
> is also a keyboard shortcut but what it is alludes me at the moment.

Thanks Nick... always saw the bolded line, but didn't realize that double
right clicking would do the trick... such a "feature" isn't documented
anywhere. :o)



Nick

-- 
-=Nick Andriash=-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Keys available from KeyServers
---

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   
--

Re: Spell Checker Oddity ?

[Nick Danger]

In Reference to "Spell Checker Oddity ?" From Nick Andriash:

>> It's there, just quirky.  If you type Febuary you'll notice a more
>> squared off underline than the usual zigzag type for misspelling. For
>> those words a double right click will "auto correct".

NA> Thanks Nick... always saw the bolded line, but didn't realize that double
NA> right clicking would do the trick... such a "feature" isn't documented
NA> anywhere. :o)

It's there under Spell Checking:

"- Intelligent suggestions for misspelled words - SSCE can locate
suggested replacements using either typographical (looks like) or
phonetic (sounds like) matching. Suggestions are scored by the degree
of closeness with the misspelled word, and the list of suggestions is
returned in decreasing score order. The most commonly misspelled words
are underlined by square-wave-line and can be corrected with mouse
double-click on this word"

...but kind of hidden in gobs of text!

-- 
- Nick

Nick Danger's Complimentary Curse <(©¿©)>:
May 4,000 subhuman wine stewards play hockey in your pocket.

Using The Bat! 1.39
 under Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998  



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   
--

Re: Spell Checker Oddity ?

[Allie Martin]

On Wed, 26 Jan 2000 11:05:15 -0800, Nick Andriash wrote:

==8<
>> I see under the spellchecker menu, an option for automatic checking. Where's
>> this autochecking option? I don't see it anywhere. :-/

> Well the option is invoked if you simply choose the option off the Spell
> Checker Menu, and becomes the default unless you un-check it... you'll
> notice if you choose it, it puts a check mark next to it.

I made a typo there. I meant 'autocorrection', which is different from
automatic checking. I don't see an option for that (autocorrecting) in the
spell check menu or the spell check option though I hear much speak about
it.

-- 
-=Allie=- | Using The Bat! v1.39
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  | Windows NT4.0 (Service Pack 6)
--†-
[ Efficiency takes time! Frugality: who can afford it? ]


-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   
--

Re: Spell Checker Oddity ?

[Allie Martin]

On Wed, 26 Jan 2000 13:28:57 -0600, Nick Danger wrote:

==8<

> "- Intelligent suggestions for misspelled words - SSCE can locate
> suggested replacements using either typographical (looks like) or
> phonetic (sounds like) matching. Suggestions are scored by the degree
> of closeness with the misspelled word, and the list of suggestions is
> returned in decreasing score order. The most commonly misspelled words
> are underlined by square-wave-line and can be corrected with mouse
> double-click on this word"

OK, I found the options now I was using the CSAPI based spellchecker
which gives less options in a very different menu. That's probably why my
right-click 'ignore all' was functioning just fine.

-- 
-=Allie=- | Using The Bat! v1.39
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  | Windows NT4.0 (Service Pack 6)
--†-
[ Hell, if you understood everything I said, you'd be me! ]


-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   
--

Re: Spell Checker Oddity ?

[Fred Weissman]

NA>> Thanks Nick... always saw the bolded line, but didn't realize that double
NA>> right clicking would do the trick... such a "feature" isn't documented
NA>> anywhere. :o)

> It's there under Spell Checking:

> "- Intelligent suggestions for misspelled words - SSCE can locate
> suggested replacements using either typographical (looks like) or
> phonetic (sounds like) matching. Suggestions are scored by the degree
> of closeness with the misspelled word, and the list of suggestions is
> returned in decreasing score order. The most commonly misspelled words
> are underlined by square-wave-line and can be corrected with mouse
> double-click on this word"

> ...but kind of hidden in gobs of text!

"Hidden" being the operative word.  I must've read the help file for the
spell checker half a dozen times during this thread and I never -once- saw
that paragraph.

I did, however, find a number of occasions where the word "directory" is
used instead of "dictionary."

-- 
Whenever I start getting sad about where I am in my life, I think about
the last words of my favorite uncle: "A TRUCK"

[EMAIL PROTECTED]www.phred.net/~phred

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   
--

Re: Spell Checker Oddity ?

[Nick Andriash]

On Wednesday, January 26, 2000, 11:28:57 AM, Nick Danger wrote:

> It's there under Spell Checking:

quoted snipped

>...but kind of hidden in gobs of text!

Well, I'll be darned!! I must have read that section a dozen times, and it
STILL didn't register with me!! ;o)

Thanks Nick...


Nick

-- 
-=Nick Andriash=-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Keys available from KeyServers
---

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   
--

Re: Spell Checker Oddity ?

[Januk Aggarwal]

Hello Fred,


On  Wednesday, January 26, 2000  at  13:33:14 GMT -0500 (which was 10:33 AM where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:


> I've noticed that 'different' underline and never realized why.
> Thanks.
> And yes, a double-right-click does auto correct it.

 It is a neat little feature isn't it? :)

> But that's not exactly -auto- in my mind.  Auto should mean no user
> intervention.

 Not necessarily. I think it is far better this way, since I may have
 a valid reason for typing a misspelled word in a given message. I
 can't think of a good example right now, but I'm sure you can think
 of something. :)


-- 
Thanks for writing
 Januk
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Using The Bat! 1.39
 under Windows 98 4.10 Build   A 

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   
--

Re: Spell Checker Oddity ?

[Nick Andriash]

On Wednesday, January 26, 2000, 6:35:50 PM, Januk Aggarwal wrote:

>> But that's not exactly -auto- in my mind.  Auto should mean no user
>> intervention.

>  Not necessarily. I think it is far better this way, since I may have
>  a valid reason for typing a misspelled word in a given message. I
>  can't think of a good example right now, but I'm sure you can think
>  of something. :)

I usually use thes (sic) as my way of indicating a purposely misspelled
word, but I know what you mean. :o)

Nick

-- 
-=Nick Andriash=-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Keys available from KeyServers
---

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   
--

Re: Spell Checker Oddity ?

[Januk Aggarwal]

Hello Nick,


On  Wednesday, January 26, 2000  at  19:49:47 GMT -0800 (which was 7:49 PM where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:


> On Wednesday, January 26, 2000, 6:35:50 PM, Januk Aggarwal wrote:

>>> But that's not exactly -auto- in my mind.  Auto should mean no user
>>> intervention.

>>  Not necessarily. I think it is far better this way, since I may have
>>  a valid reason for typing a misspelled word in a given message. I
>>  can't think of a good example right now, but I'm sure you can think
>>  of something. :)

> I usually use thes (sic) as my way of indicating a purposely misspelled
> word,

 That's a good way of doing it, but if the "Auto" Correct option tried
 to change it on you, your "(sic)" would refer to a correctly spelled
 word.  And that might not make any sense at all... :)

 I personally don't like Auto-Correctors.  They are handy if you're
 typing fast, but what if you type something like:

 "...and, hwo are you?"
  ^^^
 Should it read, "...and, how are you?" or "...and, who are you?"

 At least if it stays hwo, it is more likely one will catch the
 mistake. If the Spell Checker forces the wrong one, it can be hard to
 find the mistake, even with a proof read. Especially in e-mail where
 tone is *extremely* important. If one asks "How are you," it is
 generally a nice friendly question, but "Who are you," can be taken
 as very offensive, in the right context.

 The way TB does it is very nice, it makes it very easy to find
 obvious mistakes.
 
 Just a little more than my two cents worth... :)

 
-- 
Thanks for writing
 Januk
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Using The Bat! 1.39
 under Windows 98 4.10 Build   A 

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   
--

Re: spell checker dictionaries

[Robin Anson]

On Fri 11 June 2004, 7:15:26 +1000, Cyrille wrote:
> 3) Does anybody know how TB detects the CSAPI dictionaries, and what
> might be the reason that TB does not detect a CSAPI dictionary which
> is obviously installed, while all other installed CSAPI
> dictionary are detected?

Good question! I have MS Office installed, with dictionaries, but TB!
doesn't detect _any_ CSAPI dictionaries. I would love to know the answer.

-- 
Robin Anson
Using The Bat! v2.11.02 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1







Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: spell checker dictionaries

[MAU]

Hello Ian,

RA>> Good question! I have MS Office installed, with dictionaries, but TB!
RA>> doesn't detect _any_ CSAPI dictionaries. I would love to know the answer.
> 
> Interestingly, when I was using TB! 1.xx, I could not use the CSAPI
> dictionaries. After upgrading to TB! 2.xx, they suddenly started
> working (I am using Office 97).

My experience is that TB will only detect CSAPI dictionaries from Office
97. For some time I used Office 2000 (as an upgrade to 97) and I had no
problems. When I moved to Office XP I installed from scratch and TB
could not see any CSAPI dictionaries. So, I uninstalled and then
installed Word 97 with the desired dictionaries and then Office XP again
and everything is working fine here. Why? I don't really know.

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v2.10.03





Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: spell checker dictionaries

[Cyrille]

Hello,

What about my other two questions in this thread?
Thursday, June 10, 2004, 11:15:26 PM, I started this thread. Until now
I got a reaction (not an answer) to question no. 3, but nothing about
the first two ones (see mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] )

Thank you in advance for your help!

--
Best regards,
Cyrille
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[ TB! 2.11.02, Windows ME 4.90 Build 3000, Pentium 233Mhz with 95MB ]




Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: spell checker dictionaries

[Paul Cartwright]

On Saturday, June 12, 2004, 4:41 PM, you wrote:

C> Hello,

C> What about my other two questions in this thread?
C> Thursday, June 10, 2004, 11:15:26 PM, I started this thread. Until now
C> I got a reaction (not an answer) to question no. 3, but nothing about
C> the first two ones (see mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] )

 I just tried to add a file to my dictionary, and it locked up TB and I
 had to restart it. the file was the codus.dic from Corel's WordPerfect
 program. I have Word 2003 installed also, but I did a search for *.dic
 and it didn't show one from any WORD folder.
 

-- 
 Paul
Using The Bat! v2.11.03 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Service Pack 1
Apr2004 (4.1.412)  (avast! version number)
0424-3 (11.06.2004) (avast! DB version number)
4.1.412 (avast! plugin version number)
  



Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: spell checker dictionaries

[Roelof Otten]

Hallo Cyrille,

On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 23:15:26 +0200GMT (10-6-2004, 23:15 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:

C> Australian English, Catalan, Czech, French Canadian, Norwegian (Nynorsk)
C> Dutch, Polish, Russian, Hungarian

Try to find an older international pack. Somehow Dutch didn't get
included in the latest, but it was available in older versions. This
statement might be valid for other languages too.

I didn't realize that until now, since I installed TB only recently on
this pc and hardly sent any messages in my native language. I guess
I'll have to grab an old intpack from one of my other pc's.

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

Disclaimer: Any opinion stated in this message is not necessarily shared by my budgies 
or rabbits.



Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: spell checker dictionaries

[Charles M. Gerungan]

Hello Roelof,

Sunday, June 13, 2004, 12:06:28 AM, you wrote:

C>> Australian English, Catalan, Czech, French Canadian, Norwegian (Nynorsk)
C>> Dutch, Polish, Russian, Hungarian

RO> Try to find an older international pack. Somehow Dutch didn't get
RO> included in the latest, but it was available in older versions. This
RO> statement might be valid for other languages too.

Can you sent it to me, the Dutch spelling checker? Alvast bedankt.

-- 
Regards, Charles.



Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: spell checker dictionaries

[Roelof Otten]

Hallo Charles,

On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 02:18:37 +0200GMT (13-6-2004, 2:18 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:

C>>> Australian English, Catalan, Czech, French Canadian, Norwegian (Nynorsk)
C>>> Dutch, Polish, Russian, Hungarian

RO>> Try to find an older international pack. Somehow Dutch didn't get
RO>> included in the latest, but it was available in older versions. This
RO>> statement might be valid for other languages too.

CMG> Can you sent it to me, the Dutch spelling checker? Alvast bedankt.

Not necessary anymore. My message was dated when I sent it. ;-) Per
the eighth of June the Dutch spelling checker is included again in the
international pack at the ritlabs site:
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/the_bat/intpack.msi

I had just installed TB on this pc (a new one) with the latest
downloads on the fourth of June, so I thought it was a safe assumption
that I was up to date for a week or two. ;-)

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

Disclaimer: Any opinion stated in this message is not necessarily shared by my budgies 
or rabbits.



Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: spell checker dictionaries

[Charles M. Gerungan]

Hello Roelof,

Sunday, June 13, 2004, 11:47:54 AM, you wrote:

CMG>> Can you sent it to me, the Dutch spelling checker? Alvast bedankt.

RO> Not necessary anymore. My message was dated when I sent it. ;-) Per
RO> the eighth of June the Dutch spelling checker is included again in the
RO> international pack at the ritlabs site:
RO> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/the_bat/intpack.msi

Got it, thanks.

-- 
Regards, Charles.



Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Spell Checker Annoyance?

[Ming-Li]

Hi Nick,

> It's when I spell check a document that I download from another
> location that the problem appears.

How do you spell check in TB a document downloaded from another
location? You copy-paste it into a message editing window, or...?

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

Using The Bat! 1.45 S/MIME under Win2k



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org

Re: Spell Checker Annoyance?

[Nick Andriash]

On Saturday, July 29, 2000, at 5:12:01 AM, Ming-Li Wrote:

ML> How do you spell check in TB a document downloaded from another
ML> location? You copy-paste it into a message editing window, or...?

Exactly! I have a couple of rather large documents that I originally
created in TB!, and saved them as text documents for other uses. I am
always updating those documents, so I usually keep a copy of those
documents for editing within TB! but with my recent reformat, I had
taken them out and then reloaded them back once I had TB! up and running
again.

With the new installation, I lost my old User Dictionary, so when I
brought back the documents, TB! immediately found numerous errors. It
was in correcting those errors (more like adding those words back into
my new User Dictionary) that I noticed TB!'s Spell Checker would return
to the very first word in the document after each correction.


Nick

-=Nick Andriash=- [ TB! v1.45 S/MIME | PGP 6.5.3 | Win 98 4.10 ]
PGP Keys:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendPGPKeys
_

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org

Re: Spell Checker Annoyance?

[dMb]

Nick wrote:

> Having had to re-install TB! due to a reformat, I am running into a
> Spell Check annoyance that was not there previously. When I write
> messages, I enable auto-correct and Spell Checker works as it did
> before...

This reminds me of a question that I've been meaning to ask for a
while:

Just how does the Auto Correction Feature work.

It's my understanding that if I type the word "teh", it should
automatically correct it to "the" if it appears in the dictionary.

However, it doesn't.  And yes, the option is selected.

What am I missing here?

Thanks.

Derek
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -'95 Concours
DoD #1359  COG #2103  SR #772  AEE #036025  ASHRAE #5106329  
PADI NRA LF-FL A (American Association Against Acronym Abuse)

Born to be Wild. Sentenced to Sedation.

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org

Re: Spell Checker Annoyance?

[Januk Aggarwal]

Hello dMb,


On  Saturday, July 29, 2000  at  20:57:16 GMT -0400 (which was 5:57 PM
where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:


> Just how does the Auto Correction Feature work.

> It's my understanding that if I type the word "teh", it should
> automatically correct it to "the" if it appears in the dictionary.

 If you notice, some misspelled words are underlined with triangular
waves, and others with square waves.  If you double right click on the
square wave words, then they change.  This is a plus and a minus.  It
is a plus when you intentionally want to misspell a word, like in your
example above.  It has the obvious disadvantage that it is not
intuitive. This is especially true if one is used to MS Word's
implementation of "autocorrection."


 


-- 
Thanks for writing,
 Januk Aggarwal
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Using The Bat! 1.45 S/MIME
 under Windows 98 4.10 Build   A 

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org

Re: Spell Checker Annoyance?

[Curtis]

On Sat, 29 Jul 2000 20:57:16 -0400, dMb wrote:

d> Just how does the Auto Correction Feature work.

d> It's my understanding that if I type the word "teh", it should
d> automatically correct it to "the" if it appears in the dictionary.

Nope. It will indicate that the word is spelt incorrectly as you
type, indicating this through a squiggly line under the word involved.
If you type obvious typos, then the appearance of the squiggly line is
different and in that instance double right-clicking on the word will
lead to an auto-correction. The change in appearance will appear with
mistypes as 'recieve' or 'teh' or 'yuo'. Double right click and the
correction will be made without your having to select from a drop down
list.

-- 
-=A.C. Martin=-   [ TB! v1.45 S/MIME | Win2k Pro ]
PGP Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendAlliePGPKey

"Never trust a woman who tells her real age. " 

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org

Re: Spell Checker Annoyance?

[dMb]

Januk wrote:


>> It's my understanding that if I type the word "teh", it should
>> automatically correct it to "the" if it appears in the dictionary.

>  If you notice, some misspelled words are underlined with triangular
> waves, and others with square waves.

I do now.  :)

> If you double right click on the square wave words, then they change.

So they do.  Interesting.

> This is a plus and a minus.  It
> is a plus when you intentionally want to misspell a word, like in your
> example above.  It has the obvious disadvantage that it is not
> intuitive. This is especially true if one is used to MS Word's
> implementation of "autocorrection."

Agreed.  So what are all the options on the right for when adding a
word to the dictionary.  I see that I can autocorrect words that don't
appear in there.  Are those words for "special" auto correcting
features?

I've experimented with them a little but I still don't fully
understand the logic.

Thanks.

Derek

 





-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -'95 Concours
DoD #1359  COG #2103  SR #772  AEE #036025  ASHRAE #5106329  
PADI NRA LF-FL A (American Association Against Acronym Abuse)

Born to be Wild. Sentenced to Sedation.



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org

Re: Spell Checker Request

[Roelof Otten]

Hallo Bill,

On Sat, 6 Nov 2004 14:53:50 -0600GMT (6-11-2004, 21:53 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:

BM> Two minor enhancements would make the spell checker
BM> more user friendly:

Why not set the spell checker for "automatic checking", it'll give you
some coloured lines, but it won't bother you with dialogues.

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

What youth deemed crystal, age finds was dew.

The Bat! 3.0.2.4 Rush
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
1 pop3 account, server on LAN



pgp9lDFH7d1x8.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Spell Checker Request

[Bill McCarthy]

On Sat 6-Nov-04 6:25pm -0400, Roelof Otten wrote:

> Why not set the spell checker for "automatic
> checking", it'll give you
> some coloured lines, but it won't bother you with dialogues.

It is set for automatic checking.  That doesn't stop
the dialog OK box.  I type fast enough that I often
plan to go back but don't always make it before
clicking on Send - that's why I have `Check before
Send/Queue` set also.

-- 
Best regards,
Bill

Beta 3.0.2.5 Pro  BayesIt! 0.7.3  XMP 0.9.6  XP Pro SP2  POP3




Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Spell Checker Request

[Roelof Otten]

Hallo Bill,

On Sat, 6 Nov 2004 23:19:07 -0600GMT (7-11-2004, 6:19 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:

BM> It is set for automatic checking.  That doesn't stop
BM> the dialog OK box.  I type fast enough that I often
BM> plan to go back but don't always make it before
BM> clicking on Send - that's why I have `Check before
BM> Send/Queue` set also.

In that case the thing you can do is to add a formal wish to the wish
list. Posting the wish here doesn't do you any good, except for
getting people who agree with to add their support to your wish.

You can insert wishes in the wish list, by logging in to:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/main_page.php
Choose 'The Bat! wishes' and add a new item.
First check whether someone has made the same wish, then you can
support that wish.
Wishes that are supported by more users are more likely to be granted
than wishes by one. And the system isn't smart enough to understand
that wishes might be the same.
And add just one wish per entry. Makes everything easier, both for
other users who want to add support and for the developers.

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

When you're a little rabbit,  carry a big gun.

The Bat! 3.0.2.4 Rush
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
1 pop3 account, server on LAN



pgp2ONCLvvRyE.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Spell checker-Language

[Geoff Lane]

Sunday, January 27, 2002, 6:48:23 AM, Paul Berger wrote:

> There is a small problem. I cannot change from American English to Australian or 
>British English.

> If I do, all the actions are greyed out:
> Automatic checking
> Check entire text
> Options
> Dictionary

> Is there a way to set this choice?
---

I had the same problems when I first selected British English as my
proofing language. In my case, it was because I hadn't installed the
international language pack (separate download from RitLabs). Once I'd
installed that pack, it all worked.

HTH,

-- 
Geoff Lane
Cornwall, UK
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
--
Using The Bat! v1.53d on Windows NT 4.0 Build 1381 Service Pack 6
Press any button to continue, any other button to quit


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 

Re: Spell checker-Language

[John Phillips]

Hello Paul
You wrote  On Sun, 27 Jan 2002, at 17:48:23 [GMT +1100] (17:48 Australian Eastern 
Time,Sunday):

> Is there a way to set this choice?


I think the writer may be talking about the CSAPI directories.  I also have this
problem.

-- 
Regards
John Phillips   Sydney, Australia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HTML mail & spam not welcome.
Bat! 1.53d Windows 98 4.10 Build   ASony Vaio Notebook PCG-505TS Pentium 300 
64meg ram


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 

Re: Spell checker & Office XP

[Dieter Hummel]

Good afternoon List Members,

On Sat, 13 Apr 2002 at 10:52:12 [GMT +0200] Tomasz2D wrote:

> In The Bat! 1.60c capable already to use Office XP spell checker
> dictionaries (SCAPI)?

No.  Microsoft  changed  their  policy to not let other apps use their
property.

-- 
Regards
Dieter

MUA: Ritlabs TheBat! 1.60d [2E7F60DA]
 OS: Windows v5.1 Build 2600 | Northwood P4/2.2G


- Outgoing mail with  possible attachments is found to  be virus free -
- Checked by  AVP 4.0.1.54, using  database update from  Apr 12, 2002 -
- All unannounced attachments will be automatically deleted by system -




Current Ver: 1.60c
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Spell checker & Office XP

[Michal Kozusznik]

> > In The Bat! 1.60c capable already to use Office XP spell checker
> > dictionaries (SCAPI)?
>
> No.  Microsoft  changed  their  policy to not let other apps use their
> property.

So, is there any other way to get spell checking in TB! with latest
systems/software?

Michal Kozusznik



Current Ver: 1.60c
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Spell checker & Office XP

[Michal Kozusznik]

> > In The Bat! 1.60c capable already to use Office XP spell checker
> > dictionaries (SCAPI)?
>
> No.  Microsoft  changed  their  policy to not let other apps use their
> property.

So, is there any other way to get spell checking in TB! with latest
systems/software?

Michal Kozusznik




Current Ver: 1.60c
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Spell checker & Office XP

[Jernej Simonèiè]

Hello Michal,

15. april 2002, 14:29:13, you wrote:

> So, is there any other way to get spell checking in TB! with latest
> systems/software?

The Bat has it's own dictionaries for some languages.

-- 
Jernej Simoncic, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www2.arnes.si/~sopjsimo/
ICQ: 26266467

[The Bat! v1.60d on Windows 98 4.10.. A ]

If you're feeling good, don't worry. You'll get over it.
   -- Boling's Postulate



Current Ver: 1.60c
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Spell checker & Office XP

[Miguel A. Urech]

Hola Ricardo,

> Any chance of geting an Spanish dictionary?

Download and install the International Pack from:

  http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/download.html

It includes a Spanish dictionary.

Un cordial saludo :)

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.60c



Current Ver: 1.60c
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Spell Checker - Change ALL function

[Januk Aggarwal]

Hello Guy,

It was Wednesday, August 14, 2002 at 8:47 AM, when Guy Prince [GP]
wrote:

GP> I find that when I am replying, forwarding or a new email and open
GP> up the spell checker, the CHANGE ALL function doesn't change all.

I can't confirm.  I just typed the line: dgo dgo dgo

I then ran the spell checker, selected dog from the suggestion box and
hit Change All.  All three were changed to dog.

GP> It changes that ONE misspelling and then goes onto the next
GP> misspelling.

Are you sure they have been misspelt the same way?  Is it possible
you've misunderstood the function?  Perhaps I'm misunderstanding
you.  Could you please post an example paragraph where the function
failed to perform for you?

By the way, you may have noticed you got no replies in a timely
manner.  That is because you started a new subject by simply replying
to another message and changing the subject.  TB offers threading to
read related messages together in a logical order.  The best threading
method is by References (View -> View Threads by -> References) and
your method of posting does not destroy that information.  That means
your post was lost in a rather obscure thread that few probably read
(I didn't until today).

To avoid being accidentally ignored, please start new topics by
creating a new message, not by replying to another message.


-- 
Thanks for writing,
 Januk Aggarwal

I'm really easy to get along with once you people learn to worship me.



 Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information: 
 http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Spell Checker - Change ALL function

[Jonathan Angliss]

Hi Januk,
On Sat, 17 Aug 2002 16:51:33 -0700, you wrote:

> Are you sure they have been misspelt the same way?  Is it possible
> you've misunderstood the function?  Perhaps I'm misunderstanding
> you.  Could you please post an example paragraph where the function
> failed to perform for you?

It may also be case-sensitive matching as well, in which case Dgo would not
match dgo, and therefore the function would also fail.  I've not tried using the
spell checker in that method as I have the check on type set, so I can see when
I type something wrong as I am going along... saves me having to run another
function before I do anything, as I can see straight away my mistakes.

-- 
Jonathan Angliss
([EMAIL PROTECTED])


 Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information: 
 http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Spell Checker - Change ALL function

[Luc]

 Good night Jonathan,
  
It was foretold that on 18-8-2002 @ 19:11:47 GMT-0500 (which was
2:11:47 where I live) Jonathan Angliss spread these wise comments:
  

JA> It may also be case-sensitive matching as well, in which case Dgo would not
JA> match dgo, and therefore the function would also fail.
Tried it with dgo dgo dgo and it worked. But indeed, if you type Dgo
dgo dgo it changes the first and then goes onto the next so it's
case-sensitive.

JA> I've  not  tried  using the spell checker in that method as I have
JA> the check on type set,
I'm sure you know this but you can still use the "check entire text"
option as well in that case.

-- 
Best regards,
 Luc
---
Powered by The Bat! version 1.61 with Windows 2000 (build 2195),
version 5.0 and using the best browser: Opera.

"The church is near but the road is icy; the tavern is far away but I
will walk carefully." - Russian proverb.




 Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information: 
 http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Spell Checker - Change ALL function

[Dwight A Corrin]

On Saturday, August 17, 2002, 8:00:55 PM, Luc wrote:

>  so it's case-sensitive.

shouldn't it be? you don't want to change both

> Now, taht is it
and
> Taht is it

the same way.
-- 
Dwight A. Corrin
P O Box 47828
Wichita KS 67201-7828
316.263.9706  fax 316.263.6385
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! 1.60i on Windows XP version 5,1




 Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information: 
 http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Spell Checker - Change ALL function

[Luc]

 Good morning Dwight,
  
It was foretold that on 18-8-2002 @ 20:50:22 GMT-0500 (which was
3:50:22 where I live) Dwight A Corrin spread these wise comments:
  

DAC> shouldn't it be?
  
 Of course, i was just replying to Jonathans' remark that it might be
 case-sensitive. The case-sensivity makes sense to me :-)

-- 
Best regards,
 Luc
---
Powered by The Bat! version 1.61 with Windows 2000 (build 2195),
version 5.0 and using the best browser: Opera.






 Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information: 
 http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: spell checker - three usage questions / difficulties

[Eric]

Dear list,
Mile mentioned having

MeTB>  American-style "-ize" endings on
MeTB>   words instead of the British "-ise" ending.

Personally, I regard the -ize form as British. It's
certainly the suffix preferred by the Oxford English
Dictionary and the OUP.

-- 
Eric

Using TB! v2.11.02 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1




Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Spell Checker after the cut sign

[DG Raftery Sr.]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Sunday, October 05, 2003
9:39:01 AM (GMT -05:00)
RE: "Spell Checker after the cut sign"

Greetings Edgar,

On Sunday, October 5, 2003, 9:12:52 AM, you wrote:

Edgar> Is there a way to let the spell checker stop checking after the cut
Edgar> sign?

Sorry. Not that I know of.

- --
Regards,
 DG Raftery Sr.

FOR SALE: 1 set of morals, never used, will sell cheap.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 9.0b1
Comment: KeyID: 0xECFE3F95
Comment: Fingerprint: 8ABE 6728 1CB9 E231 B2C8  C29D BC22 D3D1 ECFE 3F95

iQA/AwUBP4AfIbwi09Hs/j+VEQK3GgCeJmyzNnmv4YaSLEPMPgRLwpSWGzoAnjR9
1Bn6q2+5dJiulQXgsy+KIx8Q
=qTqQ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current version is 2.00.6 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Spell checker: hoe to activate international one

[Gerard]

ON Thursday, October 10, 2002, 1:59:41 PM, you wrote:

AAG> Hello Batmans,

AAG>   I've just moved The Bat under other copy of OS (from win2k to
AAG>   WinXP). Well... It's not first time for me, but may be i'v missed
AAG>   something, while copying just HKLM-Software-RIT and
AAG>   HKCU-Software-RIT to new OS... Anyway i can't see additional native
AAG>   Language in Spell Checker-Language Menu (while replying for example)

AAG>   Any ideas would be appreciable, guys.

Hi Alexander,
   You need to install the International Pack.

-- 
Best regards,
 Gerard 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!


 Using The Bat! v1.61 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3



Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Spell checker: hoe to activate international one

[Thomas F.]

Hello Alexander,

On Thu, 10 Oct 2002 17:59:41 +0600 GMT (10/10/02, 18:59 +0700 GMT),
Alexander A. Gomanyuk wrote:

AAG> while copying just HKLM-Software-RIT

This one is obsolete. You can delete it.

AAG> and HKCU-Software-RIT to new OS...

This is the only one you need to copy.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.

Fettflecken werden wie neu, wenn man sie regelmaessig mit Butter
beschmiert.

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.62/Beta1
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build  A 
using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM



Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Spell checker: hoe to activate international one

[Allie C Martin]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Alexander A. Gomanyuk [AAG] wrote:'

>> This is the only one you need to copy.

AAG> clear... but what's about my question ?

Have you tried reinstalling the language pack? Or did you forget to
install it on the new system?

- -- 
Allie C Martin \  TB! v1.62/Beta5 & WinXP Pro (SP1)
 List Moderator/   PGP Key - http://pub-key.ac-martin.com
 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1-cvs (Win32) - GPGshell v2.60

iD8DBQE9qb50V8nrYCsHF+IRAlRCAKCAcbty01PqkwqfgJsmAgVppfwDbwCg/Yy7
UbIIuzcCIIhkycNn1a2oZEw=
=vk8/
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Spell checker: hoe to activate international one

[Thomas F.]

Hello Alexander,

On Fri, 11 Oct 2002 09:09:19 +0600 GMT (11/10/02, 10:09 +0700 GMT),
Alexander A. Gomanyuk wrote:

AAG> clear... but what's about my question ?

I don't know. Over here in the editor window, Spell Checker / Language
works fine.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.

I know you think you understood what I said, but what you heard was
not what I meant.

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.62/Beta1
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build  A 
using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM



Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Spell checker: hoe to activate international one

[Gerard]

ON Friday, October 11, 2002, 5:08:53 AM, you wrote:


AAG> done... hothing changed :(((

Alexander,

Under options|language are there any choices there?

-- 
Best regards,
 Gerard 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
He didn't administer the reign of terror, just the occasional light
shower. -- Sourcery


 Using The Bat! v1.61 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3



Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Spell Checker (was Re: From WIN 95 to Win2K)

[Ming-Li]

On Sat, 14 Apr 2001 at 10:42:36 -0400 dMb wrote:

> I'm happy to report that moving from my Win 95 to Win2k machine was
> very easy.

Good.

> All I did was back up the registry settings and then copied the
> entire TB! directory structure onto a zip disk.

> Insert zip disk into new machine, copy to same directory structure
> and restore the registry settings.

Wait a minute. You didn't mention installing TB on the new machine.
Did you do that? Or did you just copy the whole thing (program and
mail base) over?

The difference? Upon installation, TB make changes/additions to the
registry. Most, *but not all*, of them are under the HKCU...\RIT
tree, as explained several times on the list.

Those not under the tree are not user-specific or system-specific,
so there's no need to move those settings when you move a TB
configuration from one machine to another. But that doesn't mean you
don't need those settings. If you haven't installed TB on the new
machine, therefore, it's wise to do it now.

> The only thing that has stopped working is the spell checker.

I'm not sure it's related to what's said above. Why don't you try it
(unless you've installed TB; just didn't mention it) and see if it
helps.

Or see if others have better clues.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.52 Beta/4 | Win2k SP1



-- 
__
Archives   : 
Moderators : 
TBTech List: 
Unsubscribe: 

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org

Re: Spell Checker (was Re: From WIN 95 to Win2K)

[Nick Andriash]

On April 15, 2001, at 8:53:22 AM, Ming-Li wrote:

>> Insert zip disk into new machine, copy to same directory structure and
>> restore the registry settings.

I've performed that same routine a number of times, and have yet to run
into any kind of problem. :o)

> Wait a minute. You didn't mention installing TB on the new machine.
> Did you do that? Or did you just copy the whole thing (program and
> mail base) over?

> The difference? Upon installation, TB make changes/additions to the
> registry. Most, *but not all*, of them are under the HKCU...\RIT
> tree, as explained several times on the list.

Yes, but he did mention that he restored the Registry entries.

> Those not under the tree are not user-specific or system-specific,
> so there's no need to move those settings when you move a TB
> configuration from one machine to another. But that doesn't mean you
> don't need those settings. If you haven't installed TB on the new
> machine, therefore, it's wise to do it now.

Why? What would installing TB! change? Simply moving over the entire
Program Files/The Bat! Folder along with restoration of the Registry
entries will/should suffice. The only advantage to actually *installing*
TB!, is that it would create an entry in the Add/Remove List of Control
Panel... but then again I've heard from others that TB!'s uninstall
routine does not work anyway. ;o)

>> The only thing that has stopped working is the spell checker.

Are there any error messages given? What exactly do you mean by "stopped
working"? It shouldn't have if you moved the entire Folder structure over
to the new machine.


Nick

  ___
-=N.J. Andriash | Vancouver, B.C. Canada=- 
  [ TB! v1.52 Beta 1 | Win 98 SE 4.10  A ] 
   [ PGP 7.0.4 | Key ID: 0x7BA3FDCE ]  
  ___


-- 
__
Archives   : 
Moderators : 
TBTech List: 
Unsubscribe: 

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org

Re: Spell Checker (was Re: From WIN 95 to Win2K)

[Dierk Haasis]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Nick!

On Sunday, April 15, 2001 at 6:17:33 PM you wrote:

>>> The only thing that has stopped working is the spell checker.

> Are there any error messages given? What exactly do you mean by "stopped
> working"? It shouldn't have if you moved the entire Folder structure over
> to the new machine.

I was wondering about it, too. Maybe he did use the MS Office spell
checker files, which he may not have carried over?

- --
Dierk Haasis

PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys

The Bat 1.52 Beta/3

Windows 95 4.0 1212 C

Die meisten Leute machen sich selbst bloß durch übertriebene
Forderungen an das Schicksal unzufrieden. (Wilhelm von Humboldt)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8ckt
Comment: Privacy is the core element of freedom!

iQA/AwUBOtnD5PTo1oA8g8dLEQJ/ZACgij0O2zBNRM451VosTg+7oCWwHdoAoONQ
4nKsknB6H78k/7ytIghPQutY
=DGEU
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
__
Archives   : 
Moderators : 
TBTech List: 
Unsubscribe: 

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org

Re: Spell Checker (was Re: From WIN 95 to Win2K)

[Ming-Li]

On Sun, 15 Apr 2001 at 09:17:33 -0700 Nick Andriash wrote:

>> The difference? Upon installation, TB make changes/additions to
>> the registry. Most, *but not all*, of them are under the
>> HKCU...\RIT tree, as explained several times on the list.

> Yes, but he did mention that he restored the Registry entries.

Yes, but what did he restore? The registry export/saving technics
commonly taught on the list is only about the branch under
[HKCU...\RIT], or at most with the addition of the now defunct
[HKLM...\RIT] tree. Upon installation, TB makes registry
additions/changes beyond those places. That's what I was talking
about.

Missing those settings probably won't have any effect on TB's
regular operation, but might be the source of such problems like
"can't launch TB when clicking on a mailto link in the browser" or
"no action when clicking on a .eml file", etc.

The registry settings TB amends during installation include:

* additional file classes (including protocol classes)
* redefine some existing file classes and/or their associated actions
* registering TB as a system-wide (and default) email client

These settings won't be ported over if you simply save the
[HKCU...\RIT] tree and imported into another machine.

Now, TB may have builtin checking routine that would check those
settings when you launch it, but I don't know how complete it is.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.52 Beta/4 | Win2k SP1



-- 
__
Archives   : 
Moderators : 
TBTech List: 
Unsubscribe: 

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org