On Tue 18 November 2003 23:22, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
> > > I can't. xcdroast doesn't recognize non-SCSI devices, that's
> > > why I've switched to SCSI
> >
> > Hmm, and neither does readcd on inspection.
>
> readcd pretty much supports the same device specification as
> cdrecord, which means IDE d
On Tue 18 November 2003 21:15, obarrot wrote:
> >Random thoughts:
> >
> >- Try getting the latest version of cdrtools, and compile and
> >install them from source
>
> I'll try what you suggest
Okay. I'm starting to suspect the kernel and/or setup though, so
this is probably not top priority.
> >
On Tue 18 November 2003 21:15, obarrot wrote:
> >Random thoughts:
> >
> >- Try getting the latest version of cdrtools, and compile and
> >install them from source
>
> I'll try what you suggest
Okay. I'm starting to suspect the kernel and/or setup though, so
this is probably not top priority.
> >
On Mon 17 November 2003 22:50, obarrot wrote:
> Hi, I can't use my CD-ATAPI cdrom with xcdroast + the ide-scsi.o
> module
>
> I had to disable DMA on this CD drive as any operation on the
> device freezed totally the
> machine!
> now I can mount & acccess this /dev/sg1 device ok but readcd does
> d
On Mon 17 November 2003 22:50, obarrot wrote:
> Hi, I can't use my CD-ATAPI cdrom with xcdroast + the ide-scsi.o
> module
>
> I had to disable DMA on this CD drive as any operation on the
> device freezed totally the
> machine!
> now I can mount & acccess this /dev/sg1 device ok but readcd does
> d
On Mon 17 November 2003 15:37, Jose Casasnovas wrote:
> Which double format DVD writers can be used under Linux?? Is Sony
> supported?? I was wondering on drivers and software to run those
> writers under Linux. In case of a single format DVD writer, which
> format (+R or -R) is recommended to be r
On Mon 17 November 2003 15:37, Jose Casasnovas wrote:
> Which double format DVD writers can be used under Linux?? Is Sony
> supported?? I was wondering on drivers and software to run those
> writers under Linux. In case of a single format DVD writer, which
> format (+R or -R) is recommended to be r
On Wed 12 November 2003 11:33, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
>
> I can't remember the version, but I'm quite sure it was a 2.01a*
> version.
> I'll try to use the driver under Win2K first, to check if it's a
> hardware problem.
Okay. How do you compare the CD to the original? Read it out with
readcd and
On Wed 12 November 2003 11:16, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a seldomly used PlexWriter 24/10/40A .
> Using cdrtools-2.01a19 and different media I always
> get strange errors:
> The cd is written without any error messages. But comparing
> it to the orignal I get mismatches always at a by
On Wed 12 November 2003 11:33, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
>
> I can't remember the version, but I'm quite sure it was a 2.01a*
> version.
> I'll try to use the driver under Win2K first, to check if it's a
> hardware problem.
Okay. How do you compare the CD to the original? Read it out with
readcd and
On Wed 12 November 2003 11:16, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a seldomly used PlexWriter 24/10/40A .
> Using cdrtools-2.01a19 and different media I always
> get strange errors:
> The cd is written without any error messages. But comparing
> it to the orignal I get mismatches always at a by
On Sat 8 November 2003 22:22, Maciek Kozyrczak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am wondering if any 'growisofs' users have upgraded their
> distros to Fedora 1.0. I have a Sony DRU-510A drive that I had
> working under Red Hat 9.0. After upgrading to Fedora 1.0, I
> recompiled the dvd tool chain, just to ensur
On Sat 8 November 2003 22:22, Maciek Kozyrczak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am wondering if any 'growisofs' users have upgraded their
> distros to Fedora 1.0. I have a Sony DRU-510A drive that I had
> working under Red Hat 9.0. After upgrading to Fedora 1.0, I
> recompiled the dvd tool chain, just to ensur
On Mon 3 November 2003 00:06, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
> > But can a file span multiple extents? The way I read the
> > comment Gary quoted, it's legal to have an image that is over
> > 2GB in size, as long as each file inside that image is no
> > larger than 2GB.
>
> Careful - the comment was about
On Mon 3 November 2003 00:06, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
> > But can a file span multiple extents? The way I read the
> > comment Gary quoted, it's legal to have an image that is over
> > 2GB in size, as long as each file inside that image is no
> > larger than 2GB.
>
> Careful - the comment was about
On Sun 2 November 2003 19:03, ljknews wrote:
> At 5:27 PM + 11/2/03, Gary Houston wrote:
> >I have been using dvd+rw-tools (5.13.4.7.4) and mkisofs
> > (cdrtools 1.11a29) to write backups to DVD. This generally
> > works. However I encountered a problem when one of the files
> > was 235167943
On Sun 2 November 2003 19:03, ljknews wrote:
> At 5:27 PM + 11/2/03, Gary Houston wrote:
> >I have been using dvd+rw-tools (5.13.4.7.4) and mkisofs
> > (cdrtools 1.11a29) to write backups to DVD. This generally
> > works. However I encountered a problem when one of the files
> > was 235167943
On Wed 29 October 2003 19:58, Dani wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm netinstalling Debian Sarge from a minimal CD. I boot the CD
> and it fails to autodetect the CD drive, maybe because it's a
> CD-RW. It's Sony CRX175A1. The installation show me the
> following list of kernel modules: aztcd, cdu31a, cm206,
On Wed 29 October 2003 19:58, Dani wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm netinstalling Debian Sarge from a minimal CD. I boot the CD
> and it fails to autodetect the CD drive, maybe because it's a
> CD-RW. It's Sony CRX175A1. The installation show me the
> following list of kernel modules: aztcd, cdu31a, cm206,
On Fri 24 October 2003 18:28, Ashish Rangole wrote:
> I am trying to read a CD that I burnt on a ATAPI CD writer.
> The cdrecord dev=ATAPI: -scanbus tells me that the writer
> device is: 0,0,0 'HL-DT-ST' 'RW/DVD GCC-4240N' 'E112' Removable
> CD-ROM
>
> When I run readcd:
>
> readcd dev=ATAPI:0,0,0
On Fri 24 October 2003 18:28, Ashish Rangole wrote:
> I am trying to read a CD that I burnt on a ATAPI CD writer.
> The cdrecord dev=ATAPI: -scanbus tells me that the writer
> device is: 0,0,0 'HL-DT-ST' 'RW/DVD GCC-4240N' 'E112' Removable
> CD-ROM
>
> When I run readcd:
>
> readcd dev=ATAPI:0,0,0
On Wed 15 October 2003 16:19, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From: Andy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
[...]
>
> 75 blocks exist nowhere in a seek related paper
>
>
> The basic position accuracy (without starting to read!) for a CD
> player must be < 2 seconds (150 sectors). This is why at least
> 150 se
On Wed 15 October 2003 16:19, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From: Andy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
[...]
>
> 75 blocks exist nowhere in a seek related paper
>
>
> The basic position accuracy (without starting to read!) for a CD
> player must be < 2 seconds (150 sectors). This is why at least
> 150 se
On Tue 14 October 2003 12:30, Andy Polyakov wrote:
> Meet the players in the field:
>
> - block buffer which provides for read-ahead, I/O requests'
> slicing and coalescing;
> - value returned by READ CAPACITY command, hereafter simply READ
> CAPACITY;
> - actual lead-out position;
>
> Rules of the
On Tue 14 October 2003 12:30, Andy Polyakov wrote:
> Meet the players in the field:
>
> - block buffer which provides for read-ahead, I/O requests'
> slicing and coalescing;
> - value returned by READ CAPACITY command, hereafter simply READ
> CAPACITY;
> - actual lead-out position;
>
> Rules of the
On Wed 8 October 2003 20:28, Gregoire Favre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> a DVD burn ended like this:
>
> Track 01: 4387 of 4449 MB written (fifo 99%) [buf 100%]
> 2.0x.
See below.
> Total translation table size: 0
> Total rockridge attributes bytes: 0
> Total directory bytes: 0
> Path table size(bytes)
On Wed 8 October 2003 20:28, Gregoire Favre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> a DVD burn ended like this:
>
> Track 01: 4387 of 4449 MB written (fifo 99%) [buf 100%]
> 2.0x.
See below.
> Total translation table size: 0
> Total rockridge attributes bytes: 0
> Total directory bytes: 0
> Path table size(bytes)
On Wed 8 October 2003 13:41, Lourens Veen wrote:
> On Wed 8 October 2003 13:03, Rob Bogus wrote:
> > Well, it could be a bad CD ;-) I just tried using dd on my old
> > burner (real SCSI), my recent burner (ATAPI+ide-scsi), and the
> > 52x reader only (ATAPI+ide-cd) and a
On Wed 8 October 2003 13:41, Lourens Veen wrote:
> On Wed 8 October 2003 13:03, Rob Bogus wrote:
> > Well, it could be a bad CD ;-) I just tried using dd on my old
> > burner (real SCSI), my recent burner (ATAPI+ide-scsi), and the
> > 52x reader only (ATAPI+ide-cd) and a
On Wed 8 October 2003 13:03, Rob Bogus wrote:
>
> Well, it could be a bad CD ;-) I just tried using dd on my old
> burner (real SCSI), my recent burner (ATAPI+ide-scsi), and the
> 52x reader only (ATAPI+ide-cd) and a Redhat 2.4.18-24.8.0 kernel,
> and no error on any of them. I can't try a 2.6 kern
On Wed 8 October 2003 13:03, Rob Bogus wrote:
>
> Well, it could be a bad CD ;-) I just tried using dd on my old
> burner (real SCSI), my recent burner (ATAPI+ide-scsi), and the
> 52x reader only (ATAPI+ide-cd) and a Redhat 2.4.18-24.8.0 kernel,
> and no error on any of them. I can't try a 2.6 kern
On Wed 8 October 2003 05:09, Rob Bogus wrote:
> Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
> >Esteemed gurus,
> >
> >if anyone is able to shed some more light on this kernel problem
> > I'd appreciate it. It's been going on for years.
> >
> >When reading the whole of an iso9660 filesystem from a cd or
> > dvd, I often
On Wed 8 October 2003 05:09, Rob Bogus wrote:
> Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
> >Esteemed gurus,
> >
> >if anyone is able to shed some more light on this kernel problem
> > I'd appreciate it. It's been going on for years.
> >
> >When reading the whole of an iso9660 filesystem from a cd or
> > dvd, I often
On Tue 7 October 2003 00:06, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
> Esteemed gurus,
>
> if anyone is able to shed some more light on this kernel problem
> I'd appreciate it. It's been going on for years.
>
> This state of affairs is not really acceptable. Does anyone know
> what the problem is caused by, and wh
On Tue 7 October 2003 00:06, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
> Esteemed gurus,
>
> if anyone is able to shed some more light on this kernel problem
> I'd appreciate it. It's been going on for years.
>
> This state of affairs is not really acceptable. Does anyone know
> what the problem is caused by, and wh
On Tue 23 September 2003 07:19, Matthew Beale wrote:
> ps, i dont think i'm actually on this list, so please CCthe
> webpage isnt very helpful in contacting the list..
You men the page at
http://www.fokus.gmd.de/research/cc/glone/employees/joerg.schilling/private/cdrecord.html
right?
On Tue 23 September 2003 07:19, Matthew Beale wrote:
> ps, i dont think i'm actually on this list, so please CCthe
> webpage isnt very helpful in contacting the list..
You men the page at
http://www.fokus.gmd.de/research/cc/glone/employees/joerg.schilling/private/cdrecord.html
right?
On Sat 19 July 2003 15:20, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 18 18:22:22 2003
>
> >> >http://www.securiteam.com/exploits/5ZP0C2AAAC.html
> >
> >So, what we have here is someone installing an old version with
> > a=20 known vulnerability, writing an exploit for it, and
> > brag
On Fri 18 July 2003 17:35, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> >Old-Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >http://www.securiteam.com/exploits/5ZP0C2AAAC.html
>
> This is just a very very old one that has been fixed on May 3th
> (3.5 months before the posting you you refer has been made).
>
>
> It could thus
On Wed 16 July 2003 16:19, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 16 15:36:51 2003
>
> >> Linus Torvalds usually blocks them :-(
> >
> >May I make a suggestion? Joerg! Next time you feel like claiming
> > that Linus Torvalds (or anybody else in person, Alan Cox
> > maybe?) is so to
On Fri 20 June 2003 14:45, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 19 14:35:41 2003
>
> The main point is that with e.g. dvdrecord, you do not have the
> freedom to use the program for the announced purpose because it
> only works for outdated drives and there is no support.
Surely
On Thu 19 June 2003 14:25, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 01:14:34PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 18 16:03:00 2003
> > >
> > >> Well, cdrecord-ProDVD definitely is free for private and
> > >> research/educational use.
> > >
> > >s/free/libre/
> >
On Thu 19 June 2003 13:14, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 18 16:03:00 2003
>
> >> Well, cdrecord-ProDVD definitely is free for private and
> >> research/educational use.
> >
> >s/free/libre/
>
> Do you really belive that the context changes if you only
> translate from engl
On Tue 10 June 2003 15:32, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >The system is dedicated for writing...
> >
> >Both the writer and media are 52x capable, but when cdrecord
> > displays progress it only comes up to 25x. All the drives have
> > UDMA enabled and each has it's own IDE b
On Sun 1 June 2003 11:58, Karl-Heinz Herrmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I wanted to upgrade to a recent cdrtools on linux 2.4.16 (and
> 21-rc6, SuSE7.x+new kernel) PIII Dell I8k laptop and ran into
> following problem:
>
> cdrecord is unable to set RR-scheduler (permission denied)
Could be me, but don't
On Thu 29 May 2003 09:29, Bob Buick wrote:
> I'm a bit of a newbie and have been getting the following message
> whenever I try to write, or blank a CD-RW in xcdroast with
> Mandrake 9.0.
>
> cdrecord: Warning: controller returns wrong size for CD
> capabilities page.
>
> I read the man file an hun
On Wed 28 May 2003 17:36, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From: Lourens Veen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >Yes, not having the build system in the printed header is
> > really=20
>
> ^^
> ?
On Wed 28 May 2003 12:45, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 28 11:06:54 2003
>
> >> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] alpha]# uname -a
> >> >Linux alfonz.agenda.si 2.4.19 #1 pon avg 12 14:49:02 CEST
> >> > 2002 alpha unknown
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >cdrtools were compiled on this system using RPM
On Wed 26 March 2003 13:23, ehab samir aziz wrote:
> I have read README and README.compile adn I do not
> know which one I should follow first ?
> I need smake to compile install file as written in
> section how to compile in README.compile there is no
> file called install in cdrtool driectory but
On Mon 24 March 2003 21:36, ehab samir aziz wrote:
> I tried to install cdrecord after tar -xvf
> cdrtools-2.0 but it seems that I should have gcc
> compiler to compiler some files . Really I do not have
That would surprise me. Jörg uses Solaris himself, and
README.solaris (did you follow the ins
On Sun 23 March 2003 22:18, ehab samir aziz wrote:
> I can not find ver 2 in this folder the maximum I can
> find cdrecord-1.09.tar.gz .
cdrecord is now part of the cdrtools package. You'll want to use
ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/cdrtools-2.0.tar.gz
HTH,
Lourens
--
GPG public key: http:/
Jörg,
(short synopsis at the bottom if you're very much in a hurry)
I've been looking at the cdrecord website for a bit, and noticed
that it is quite chaotic. Specific information is hard to find, and
everything is thrown together on one page in random order. Also
several pieces of information
On Sat 22 March 2003 17:43, ehab samir aziz wrote:
> how to chose the right version of cdrecord for my
> cd-writable ASUS 24x10x40x . and where can I find the
> tutorial of using cdrcord for my Solaris 8
The latest stable version (2.0, available from
ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/) should wor
On Fri 21 March 2003 23:29, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 21 22:32:42 2003
>
> >> A much more realistic idea is why there is no source for
> >> cdrecord-ProDVD:
> >>
> >> =09Commercial companies steel my work and sell it secretly.
> >
> >Two observations:
> >
> >1) Apparen
On Fri 21 March 2003 17:04, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 19 05:11:22 2003
>
> >> You definitely completely missunderstood the spirit of free
> >> software.
> >
> >The issue, at least for me, is not "free" it's open source. It's
> > software= =20
> >which can not be just p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri 28 February 2003 23:13, Wai Lui Fung wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I have RedHat with kernel 2.3. I just installed a plextor CDRW
> (shown below). But whenever I try to burn CDs with the command
> "cdrecord file.iso" the following error shows up. It perplex
On Fri 7 February 2003 04:08, Maxx Excaliber wrote:
> I have a Yamaha CRW4416S, with the latest firmware (1.0j) and I
> have been unable to make CDs on this computer since I upgraded
> the kernel back when I was running RedHat 7.1. I stopped using
> the updated kernel because of these problems. I h
On Sun 2 February 2003 19:04, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From: Lourens Veen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >Isn't that CD supposed to be copy protected? I think I heard=20
> >something about that. Anyway, I did a little search, and there
> > are=20
>
> There is no
On Sun 2 February 2003 03:25, Rob van Nieuwkerk wrote:
> Hi Jörg,
>
> Jörg wrote:
> > cdda2wav is the best currently known DAE tool.
> > People report even better quality than with EAC.
> >
> > In contrary to cdrdao, cdda2wav handles nearly 100% of even all
> > play protected disks. Just use cdda2w
On Mon 13 January 2003 17:52, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From: Matthias Riese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >> >Disesteeming the work of other people does not prove anything
> >> > you claim. And the interest of lost of people in the
> >> > project proves the contrary wrt to the need for the project.
It
On Sat 11 January 2003 21:28, Casey Scott wrote:
> I am using kernel 2.5.56 currently, and cdrecord is behaving
> strangely. For example, when blanking a disk, the system because
> totally unresponsive until the blanking is complete. Also, when
> actually burning a disk, the system completely freez
On Thu 9 January 2003 22:21, Matthias Riese wrote:
> Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >From: Matthias Riese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > >> >> I would never recommend unmaintained software that is
> > >> >> known not to work correctly for many drives - see the
> > >> >> mailing list
On Sun 1 December 2002 23:42, Hanspeter Roth wrote:
> Hello,
>
> what is the difference of an `audio-CD' compared to a `data-CD'?
> Does it have something to do with the `restricted' attribute?
Not directly. The difference between a data and an audio CD is the
way the bits are laid out on the dis
On Tue 19 November 2002 23:02, Robert Timm wrote:
> hallo. i have a problem:
>
> when ever i try to write on a cd i get the following output:
>
> bash-2.05a# cdrecord dev=0,0,0 -data
> /mnt/data/media/mp3/Incubus/*
>
> Cdrecord 1.9 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Copyright (C) 1995-2000 Jörg
Upgrade to the la
On Friday 01 Nov 2002 10:42 pm, Tom Crane wrote:
>
> I followed up Jorg's suggestion of firmware updates for the Aopen
> but there appear to be none for that drive. Any suggestions for a
> workaround to force readcd to read only the true data/2048
> sector-size?
Failing that, perhaps you could cre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 29 Oct 2002 9:18 am, Isidro Cachadiña Gutiérrez wrote:
> Hi all:
>
> This is a wish. Why the burnfree option is disabled by default?.
> Why is not enabled by default?
>
> Bye.
Because it increases the chance of bad CDs. No, I don't know ho
On Monday 28 Oct 2002 3:59 pm, Basile, Greg wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a large wav file that I want to break into several tracks
> without 2 secs of a silence between tracks ( i.e. continuous
> audio). I know how to do the job with goldenhawk. Can anyone
> point me to where this is documented
On Monday 28 Oct 2002 1:21 pm, satan wrote:
> I have problems with BTC BCE1610IM burner under linux.
>
> My software version is: Cdrecord 1.10 (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
> Copyright (C) 1995-2001 J?rg Schillin on Linux 2.4.18.
>
> I have try with cdrecord 1.11 but I have a same result.
What is the probl
On Monday 28 Oct 2002 7:07 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Lourens Veen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> Well, this kind of crash handler is just a signal handler - some
> code which is executed when the operating system tells a process
> (a program being executed) that i
Yesterday, MPlayer crashed on me. In itself that's not so
interesting, but what was interesting was their crash handler. A
message popped up explaining that MPlayer had crashed, and that
that was a bug. Then it proceeded to explain how to get basic
debugging info, with a reference to a web page
On Thursday 24 October 2002 16:59, Marcos Lorenzo wrote:
> Is there any graphical frontend for cdrecord? I mean apart from
> xcdroast or gcdmaster. Just something like Nero for linux because
> I want to turn on my PC only on Linux xD
>
> Which one(s) do you like/use and why?
I like K3B a lot. XCDR
On Monday 21 October 2002 16:50, Markus Wagner wrote:
> This was the first time I really needed help with cdrecord, and I
> am sure I described my problem detailed enough, so that other
> people can understand it. Especially the second question should
> be of great interest, because it reveals som
On Sunday 06 October 2002 21:53, Andreas Mueller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> cdrdao-1.1.7 is available from:
>
> http://sf.net/projects/cdrdao
>
>
> This release is mainly triggered by the libedc_ecc license issue
> that recently came up. The affected code has been replaced by a
> GPL compliant implementat
On Tuesday 24 September 2002 13:25, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From: Lourens Veen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >> [...] explanation
> >
> >I've just re-read the LICENSE file in the libedc directory of=20
> >cdrtools, and it doesn't mention distribution
On Monday 23 September 2002 12:03, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Preface: I am sorry, but it seems that you don't know much about
> Copyright issues :-( Many of your statements are completely
> wrong and none of your mails from the last night has been
> helpful.
>
> For a decent discussion
On Monday 23 September 2002 12:03, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Preface: I am sorry, but it seems that you don't know much about
> Copyright issues :-( Many of your statements are completely
> wrong and none of your mails from the last night has been
> helpful.
>
> For a decent discussion
On Sunday 22 September 2002 22:30, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From: Lourens Veen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >Erm, the GPL puts your program under what's known as a
> > "strong=20 copyleft". This forbids linking with
> > non-GPL-compatible code. I=20 q
On Sunday 22 September 2002 23:15, Andreas Mueller wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-09-22 at 22:47, Lourens Veen wrote:
> > On Sunday 22 September 2002 22:30, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > > From: Lourens Veen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > How
On Sunday 22 September 2002 22:30, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From: Lourens Veen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >Erm, the GPL puts your program under what's known as a
> > "strong=20 copyleft". This forbids linking with
> > non-GPL-compatible code. I=20 q
On Sunday 22 September 2002 22:06, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From: Andreas Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >> You can't GPL part of your program however, and have GPL
> >> incompatible code linked into it.
>
> This statement is not correct
Erm, the GPL puts your program under what's known as a "st
On Sunday 22 September 2002 21:46, Andreas Mueller wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-09-22 at 19:01, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > >Therefore, I will restrict the GPL license for cdrdao so that
> > > section 2 of the GPL will not apply to the libedc_ecc code. I
> > > will shortly prepare a new cdrda
On Sunday 22 September 2002 19:01, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> On 22 Sep 2002, Andreas Mueller wrote:
> >Date: 22 Sep 2002 13:15:57 +0200
>
> From: Andreas Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >To: cdwrite list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Content-Type: text/plain
> >Subject: License of cdrdao will be changed
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 13 June 2002 12:09, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
> Please be more polite to other people!
>
> Why did you choose to introduce these harsh words? I never used
> them!
>
>
> The main problem with most (maybe all???) Linux developers is
> that th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 13 June 2002 01:20, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 12 22:27:50 2002
>
> >Maybe there's a communication gap because english isn't your
> > primary language. Your arguments are not making any sense to
> > me...
>
> I
On Monday 10 June 2002 21:37, Art wrote:
> Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > >From: Art <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > >The system will produce copies using CloneCD under Win95,
> > >so we know that there is no problem with the hardware.
> > >
> > >
> > >Then we get a bunch of error messages:
> > >
> > >
101 - 185 of 185 matches
Mail list logo
