We are as well. Seems they're having some sort of trouble.
| -Original Message-
| From: Kris Pilles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 9:50 AM
| To: CF-Talk
| Subject: OT: AOL?
|
|
| Is anyone having any difficulty sending mail to AOL??? I
| have been u
Has anyone resolved the issue with AOL? We are still completely unable
to send email to any AOL addresses. Our servers are not on any lists
that we can find, and we RDNS perfectly.
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_l
I am clueless about it
I called AOL and their tech advised me to make RDNS entries for every
domain then wait 24 hours and try again
-Original Message-
From: Lee Fuller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 2:26 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: AOL? (Resolved
nsane
| -Original Message-
| From: Kris Pilles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:30 AM
| To: CF-Talk
| Subject: RE: AOL? (Resolved?)
|
|
| I am clueless about it
|
| I called AOL and their tech advised me to make RDNS entries
| for every domain then wa
ber 19, 2002 1:42 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: AOL? (Resolved?)
Did they say that they had implemented a change, or what they're doing?
This is completely irresponsible of a network administration to simply
implement something that could effect millions, without so much as a
warning, URL as
t;Again, I did not verify that this works or if it was just a rumor.
>
>Mark W. Breneman
>-Macromedia Certified ColdFusion Developer
>-Network / Web Server Administrator
> Vivid Media
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> www.vividmedia.com
> 608.270.9770
>
>-----Original Message-
>
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 3:04 PM
Subject: RE: AOL? (Resolved?)
> Is this a new issue?
>
> I remember an AOL issue almost a year ago about cfmail being blocked by
AOL
> due to CF could be used as a Spam
Oh AOL, so popular. My problems with AOL related to their dynamic proxy
system, if this is still the same what happens is that the user IP Address
changes several times during a single-user-browser session hope that makes
sense. So if any part of your application uses large amounts of client
ide
Could be an obsolete version of AOL, which:
*may have problems with JPGs that have extra info, such as thumbnails
embedded
*may not like your HTML. Have you flattened the page and run a
validator? Look for stray table tags.
Jamie
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002 09:02:07 -0700, in cf-talk you wrote:
>Hi,
Probably an HTML rendering error.
Have you validated the code? You might've forgotten to close something
somewhere... The AOL browser is extremely finicky about that stuff,
especially depending on the version he's uses. (AOL users, as a whole, do
not upgrade their browsers. ever.)
.. now, proble
>Oh AOL, so popular. My problems with AOL related to their dynamic proxy
>system, if this is still the same what happens is that the user IP Address
>changes several times during a single-user-browser session hope that makes
>sense. So if any part of your application uses large amounts of client
I believe that the newest version of AOL is using a Gecko
browser...We all know how that is. Anyhow, I would check over
the code very well and make sure their are no unclosed tags and
the such, I miss them sometimes myself. Have you tried your app
in all version of NS
Douglas Brown
Email: [EMA
- Original Message -
From: Eric Homa
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 12:02 PM
Subject: AOL Problems
Hi,
Does anyone out there have experience with an AOL client? I have a customer
whose site works fine for him at his office and also for the many other
cli
:37
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: AOL Problems
- Original Message -
From: Eric Homa
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 12:02 PM
Subject: AOL Problems
Hi,
Does anyone out there have experience with an AOL client? I have a
customer
whose site works fine for him at
ginal Message -
From: "Kreig Zimmerman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:36 AM
Subject: Re: AOL Problems
> - Original Message -
> From: Eric Homa
> To: CF-Talk
> Sent: Thursday,
m: Kreig Zimmerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 June 2002 16:37
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: AOL Problems
- Original Message -
From: Eric Homa
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 12:02 PM
Subject: AOL Problems
Hi,
Does anyone out there have experience with an AOL c
I thought AOL used IE?
-Original Message-
From: Randell B Adkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 June 2002 17:12
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: AOL Problems
Well my first thought is considering AOL is backed with the Netscape
technology and I am pretty sure they have incorporate their
AOL has now started using Gecko as it's new browser...
Douglas Brown
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Adrian Lynch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 9:31 AM
Subject: RE: A
AOL used Motzilla engine aka nutscrape, altho the latest version I
dunno
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Lynch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 17:32
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: AOL Problems
I thought AOL used IE?
-Original Message-
From: Randell B
Actually check out this site - may be of some help:
http://webmaster.info.aol.com/
J
-Original Message-
From: James Maltby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 17:46
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: AOL Problems
AOL used Motzilla engine aka nutscrape, altho the latest
http://www.epilepsyfoundation.org
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Lynch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 12:32 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: AOL Problems
I thought AOL used IE?
-Original Message-
From: Randell B Adkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
org
j> email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
j> -Original Message-
j> From: Adrian Lynch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
j> Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 12:32 PM
j> To: CF-Talk
j> Subject: RE: AOL Problems
j> I thought AOL used IE?
j> -Original Message-
j> From: Randell B Adkins [m
t imagined it...
At any rate, I could be totally confused here.
-- jon
-Original Message-
From: Jon Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 1:35 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: AOL Problems
Where did you get that information?
AOL 8.0 is in public beta right now
ginal Message -
From: "jon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 2:13 PM
Subject: RE: AOL Problems
> Are you sure about that?
>
> Here's an article that mentions that AOL's beta uses IE.
> http:
ServerID shows up in the header. AOL has blocked this...
- Original Message -
From: Ryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 8:20 AM
Subject: Re: AOL mayheim
> At 07:58 10/10/00 -0600, you wrote:
> >You cannot email
Hey Brian,
For those of us (such as myself) who apparently need new glasses, could you help us
out with a link to that info you're talking about?
---mark
--
Mark Warrick
Phone: (714) 547-5386
Efax.com Fax: (801) 730-7289
Personal Ema
copies of
dynamic sites on their network.From AOL's standpoint, the statement that
they are not "ColdFusion" friendly makes sense.
~Simon
-Original Message-
From: Warrick, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 2:34 PM
To: CF-Talk
Cc: [EMAIL PR
Subject: RE: AOL mayheim
10/10/2000
01:51 PM
em know you're working on it. Of course,
the best thing for you to do is to download and install a free AOL trial
membership, and view your site the way other AOL user would.
~Simon
-Original Message-
From: John Allred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2000 9:58 AM
>Can you or anyone else shed some light on just how far behind AOL's caching
>is? For instance, if I have info on a site that changes daily, how long
>will AOL users go between snapshots? This would help me explain to AOL
>users what they're not seeing.
They have an FAQ on the mentioned developer
tlanta, Ga [ -=.]
===:0~
"Ah, I see!", said the blind man to the deaf mute. -Unknown
-Original Message-
From: Simon Horwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2000 10:20 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: AOL mayheim
Boy, that's a tough one. I'
so you'd want to do this then? (this is how they have it set up on the
webmaster.info.aol.com)
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Queen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2000 9:34 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: AOL mayheim
OK, I have watched this thread for the
On 10/11/00, Simon Horwith penned:
>Boy, that's a tough one. I'd ask the folks at AOL, to be honest.
LOL
They're not even honest with their own webmaster, who is (or was)
active on this list. I remember him swearing up and down that AOL
doesn't cache anything with a ? in the URL. He even says
I think AOL might be doing something funky with their caching servers where
dynamic content is concerned, anyway. AOL is hitting our server every three
seconds. Now, we're not that popular of a site, and it's used mostly by
internal folks (who do not have AOL accounts). AOL said it's because we ha
on 10/12/00 12:51 AM, Gavin Myers at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> OK, I have watched this thread for the past two days and am now going to
> magically solve the AOL caching issues for everybody.
Or you could use what I use, which is to append a random number as a dummy
argument to all urls, thus t
riginal Message-
From: Gavin Myers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2000 9:51 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: AOL mayheim
so you'd want to do this then? (this is how they have it set up on the
webmaster.info.aol.com)
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Queen [mai
> the best thing for you to do is to download and install a free AOL trial
> membership, and view your site the way other AOL user would.
Don't do this part!! They will require your credit card number, you'll
cancel the account before the trial is over, and then your credit card will
be billed un
Granted that at a former job, a big majority of customers for a website were AOL
people, we decided that to test our sites, we'd bite the bullet, pay the $21.95/month
and see how our sites looked through AOL's eyes. It wasn't pretty, especially when
that test account was actually hacked once,
.
tom
- Original Message -
From: "Gregory Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2000 1:21 PM
Subject: Re: AOL mayheim
Granted that at a former job, a big majority of customers for a website were AOL
peo
> the best thing for you to do is to download and install a free AOL trial
> membership, and view your site the way other AOL user would.
Don't do this part!! They will require your credit card number, you'll
cancel the account before the trial is over, and then your credit card will
be billed un
> We are running some tests over here, trying to get AOL to cache *anything*
> of ours. We can't do it. Once the client-side caching in the browser is
> disabled, every request made through AOL comes to our servers.
> Whether it's
> cfm pages with no-cache headers, .cfm pages w/o no-cache headers
You might want to start here:
http://postmaster.info.aol.com/
HTH,
--
Howie Hamlin - inFusion Project Manager
On-Line Data Solutions, Inc. - www.CoolFusion.com - 631-737-4668 x101
inFusion Mail Server (iMS) - The Award-winning, Intelligent Mail Server
>>> Find out how iMS Stacks up to the comp
You might try http://postmaster.info.aol.com/
--
jon
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wednesday, August 21, 2002, 12:49:31 PM, you wrote:
JM> I know this has been posted here 1000 times, but I can't seem to find
JM> any information in the mail archives ...
JM> Where can I find guidelines for sending
b Development LLC
www.eaglewd.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(304) 622-5676 (Clarksburg Office)
(304) 456-4942 (Home Office)
-Original Message-
From: Jon Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 1:18 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: AOL Email Guidelines?
You might try http://postmaster.info.
: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 2:11 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: AOL Email Guidelines?
Thanks for the link ... By the way, notice what that site says when you
start clicking around?
http://postmaster.info.aol.com/index.cfm?article=13&expand=0&sitenum=7&m
enuid=14
INDEX.CFM ... That's b
ou
must upgrade immediately!!
That sucks.. I *really* don't want to have to uninstall 5.0, reinstall,
test a few times, then uninstall, reinstall, ad nauseaum...
-Original Message-
From: Jon Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 1:18 PM
To: CF-Talk
Su
, August 21, 2002 4:20 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: AOL Email Guidelines?
I just installed AOL 5.0 on Windows XP pro to test the text/x-aol mime
type for sending "rich text" compatible mail, and when I logged on to
AO-Hell was notified I can only use version 5.0 two more times because
(pa
Robert Everland wrote:
> Does anyone know where there is a place that I can view the percentage of
> people on different versions of aol?
http://webmaster.aol.com/
Jochem
__
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support
er 17, 2002 3:12 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: AOL Browser statistics
Robert Everland wrote:
> Does anyone know where there is a place that I can view the percentage
> of people on different versions of aol?
http://webmaster.aol.c
Quoting Robert Everland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I have been here before, where exactly do they list statisitcs, I
> haven't seen any.
Match the listed browser identification (sub)strings against your
webserver logs. I can tell you how many AOL browsers of each sort I see
on my site, but that
, September 17, 2002 9:02 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: AOL Browser statistics
Quoting Robert Everland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I have been here before, where exactly do they list statisitcs, I
> haven't seen any.
Match the listed browser identification (sub)strings against your
w
> I was hoping I would be able to see statistics for the aol versions for an
> email app I am making.
If it's because of DOM or other client side sripting issues:
The AOL browser is bascily just IE5.5, but may be Gecko on some platforms.
Write good complient HTML and you'll be fine.
Thomas Chive
> I was hoping I would be able to see statistics for the aol versions for an
> email app I am making.
>
There's a quick and easy way to fix that problem..
Any visiter with a UserAgent that contains AOL should be sent to a random
URL of any ISP in the world as long as its not AOL, BT or Compu
No I want aol versions, not browser versions.
Robert Everland III
Web Developer Extraordinaire
Dixon Ticonderoga Company
http://www.dixonusa.com
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Chiverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 9:13 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: AOL
40 AM >>>
No I want aol versions, not browser versions.
Robert Everland III
Web Developer Extraordinaire
Dixon Ticonderoga Company
http://www.dixonusa.com
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Chiverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 9:13 AM
To: CF-T
There could be many reasons. You'd need to check the logs of the mail server to get a
good idea of what's happening.
Regards,
Howie
- Original Message -
From: "Jeff Beer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 2:28 PM
Subject: AOL and CF
While we're at it...
Anybody know of a way to install the AOL browser and ABSOLUTELY nothing else
that AOL installs so you can locally test sites without having to have an
AOL account?
--
Les Mizzell
"People need to realize that every time
they mention about how "fragile" our
planet is, it's
- Original Message -
From: "Les Mizzell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 6:46 PM
Subject: Re: AOL and CFMAIL
> While we're at it...
>
> Anybody know of a way to install the AOL browser and ABSOLU
> Anybody know of a way to install the AOL browser and
> ABSOLUTELY nothing else that AOL installs so you can
> locally test sites without having to have an AOL account?
I don't know if that's possible, and I don't know how useful that kind of
test would be anyway. To ensure that something work
You can get AOL for $4.95 a month if you limit your online activity to 3
hours a month. That's usually enough for testing.
tom
> I don't know if that's possible, and I don't know how useful that kind of
> test would be anyway. To ensure that something works acceptably through
AOL,
> you'd real
Old News.
- Original Message -
From: "Philip J. Kaplan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, April 30, 2000 3:48 PM
Subject: AOL uses CF!
> I found a section of AOL.COM that is driven by CF. This section is linked
> from almost every page on AOL.COM ("webmaster in
Didn't your mother teach you any Manners? Postings another sites
vulnerability to a list of people you don't know? hmm..did you email the
webmaster at AOL, that would have been a better idea. Do you have a
website? What's the url? Can I look for hacks and post the results to a
list your not a
ROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, April 30, 2000 6:31 PM
Subject: Re: AOL uses CF!
> Didn't your mother teach you any Manners? Postings another sites
> vulnerability to a list of people you don't know? hmm..did you email the
> webmaster at AOL, that wou
>As a community that promotes the use of CF as a scaleable, viable solution
>for web applications, we should all hail Brook for making an excellent
>point. Drawing attention to CF vulnerable sites is only killing our plight.
I can't say I agree wholeheartedly with this statement. The sooner the
> Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2000 15:31:00 -0700
> From: Brook Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: AOL uses CF!
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Didn't your mother teach you any Manners? Postings another sites
> vulnerability to
CTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 01, 2000 2:02 AM
Subject: Re: AOL uses CF!
> > Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2000 15:31:00 -0700
> > From: Brook Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: AOL uses CF!
> > Message-ID: <[
I believe it's specific to SQL...CF or probably ANY other scripting backend
using ODBC as a transport would be vulnerable
> Now, to switch topics, what exactly is this "SQL Server exposed URL
> parameter hack"? This term doesn't ring any bells. Is this a CF specific
> issue?
-
Fred T. Sanders [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 01, 2000 1:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: AOL uses CF!
That's fine Philip so post it to a list/group that specializes in this sort
of thing and let them do it.
I think everyone (not everyone) is trying to say this type o
The following has worked for me in preventing AOL from caching dynamic
pages. Note that this must be included in ALL pages you do not wish to be
cached. (I like to put it in Application.cfm)
Michael J. Sheldon
Internet Applications Developer
Phone: 480.699.1084
http://
That is how AOL worksit can change every 15 mins. It is also fecking
annoying - especially when you have a Load Balancer working off sticky
sessions.
AOL has a proxy farm which changes its IP addresses frequently
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Some more info
http://webmaster.info.aol.com/proxyinfo.html
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 February 2005 16:27
To: CF-Talk
Subject: SOT: AOL and IPs
Hey All,
I just found something kind of odd in the web logs for one of our clients
and I'm
Can some one explain what the /number means at the end of the IP
addresses? I read the page but I didn't see anything that would
explain it. I thought they were trying to show the IP range but I have
AOL traffic out side of those ranges.
152.163.240.0/21
152.163.248.0/22
152.163.252.0/23
152.163.9
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 24 February 2005 8:49 a.m.
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: AOL and IPs
Can some one explain what the /number means at the end of the IP
addresses? I read the page but I didn't see anything that would
explain it. I thought they were trying to show the IP range but I
I found the solution - sorry for the "spam" :)
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Beer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 2:29 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: AOL and CFMAIL
Anyone know why AOL doesn't receive mail sent by CFMail (CF ver. 5.0). is
there a header issue I need
From: Jeff Beer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 11:37 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: AOL and CFMAIL - Disregard:
I found the solution - sorry for the "spam" :)
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Beer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001
iday, December 14, 2001 11:41 AM
Subject: RE: AOL and CFMAIL - Disregard:
> Hey Jeff,
>
> I am currently working on a project that might be impacted by AOL users
> (they are a big audience). Could you share the problem and solution in
> entirety? I haven't tested my app yet on t
asn't failed yet.
I tried harcoding the MAILERID to "Binford Mailblaster 2000" and never
received the message :)
-Original Message-
From: Douglas Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 2:56 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: AOL and CFMAIL - Disregard:
TED]]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 3:27 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: AOL and CFMAIL - Disregard:
It's actually an old problem. I remembered reading about it when using CF
3.0+. AOL has listed the CFMail X-header as a spam signature
X-Mailer: Allaire ColdFusion Application Server
One eas
>> .poor SOBs.
I am one of them :-)... I don't grumble with a pretty good broadband
connection that stays up forever.
Serious question tho... One benefit is that I can at least test my apps
on an AOL browser... how do you do that if you are not a member of AOL?
Is there another way of doing this
AOL does not cache objects containing a Question Mark. This is checked first,
regardless of file extension / mime type. Most CFM's fall under this category
... however, your root page will probably not: ie: http://www.company.com/
Other than that, you can use those Cache-Control Headers M
From: MATTHEW EHRENS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2000 15:18
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [RE: AOL and Caching]
AOL does not cache objects containing a Question Mark. This is checked
first,
regardless of file extension / mime type. Most CFM's fall under thi
Mike,
Should there be some visible output in the view source of pages including
this?
All I get is a bunch of carriage returns that I have to cfsetting out.
-Ben M.
>"Mike Sheldon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The following has worked for me in preventing AOL from caching dynamic
>pages. Note
ael J. Sheldon
Internet Applications Developer
Phone: 480.699.1084
http://www.desertraven.com/
PGP Key Available on Request
-Original Message-
From: MATTHEW EHRENS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2000 15:18
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [RE: AOL and Caching]
AOL
I looked that page over...and notice that they don't cache ASP pages...so
why special treatment for ASP pages and not for CF, iHTML, PHP, and other
scripting engines?
>
> AOL does not cache objects containing a Question Mark. This is checked
first,
> regardless of file extension / mime type.
Key Available on Request
>
>-Original Message-
>From: MATTHEW EHRENS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2000 15:18
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [RE: AOL and Caching]
>
>
>
>AOL does not cache objects containing a Question Mark. This is
>c
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2000 18:03
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [RE: AOL and Caching]
Mike,
Should there be some visible output in the view source of pages including
this?
All I get is a bunch of carriage returns that I have to cfsetting out.
-Ben M.
>&q
er [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2000 18:06
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [RE: AOL and Caching]
If this is true, this is a huge problem. How do we get this
addressed?
Kevin
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/03/00 04:02PM >>>
What AOL says, an
At 08:29 PM 12/1/00 -0500, you wrote:
>Hey Gang,
>
>A friend of mine just asked me to post this question. Would
>anybody know why, only on AOL 5 a site would be "loosing"
>it's session var's. They use a session var to track when a
>user logs in. On AOL 4 and AOL 6 they tell me that it works
>ju
Bill:
That really doesn't make too much sense too me either because AOL actually
uses the IE browser and have been since 4.0. They might have their cookies
turned off in the AOL 5 settings or something like that, so that the CFID
and CFTOKEN are lost. But since you said you have passed cfid and
> Anyone have any experience with this server? Good or bad. Know issues.
I personally haven't used it but I've heard rave reviews on its scalability. AOL
uses it and look how much traffic they get :-)
: David Nesbitt
: Web Production Specialist
: (e) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have been a huge fan of AOLServer for quite some time now. Unfortunately,
I am no longer running it in production :( I've included a couple of links
for information about the server. Talking about scalability, AOL receives
about 28000 hits per/second, and they use AOLserver.
http://www.photo.
if you use cfmailparam to change the x-mailer param you'll probably
get the messages through.
By default CFMX sets xmailer to:
X-Mailer: ColdFusion MX Application Server
which is probably what is being caught by AOL as spam. Change it to
appear as MS Outlook with "Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.7
There could be more to it than that. I've personally never altered
the X-Mailer, and many of my clients email thousands of pieces to AOL
members daily without trouble. However CF used to have at least one
problem that needed a param to prop it up, which I still use (not sure
if MX fixes it but I
Thank you all for your suggestions. I have implemented both the mailer-id and x-mailer
and will see what happens.
Strange thing is that I am not sending large amounts. Each day only about 850 emails
are being sent and out of that only a percentage is AOL.
Sebastian
Hey..
If the error is not resolved.. checkout the following..
http://postmaster.aol.com/guidelines/sender.html
Also if you run your own SMTP server.. good idea to sign up.. for AOL
white list.. so you get a report every time.. someone reports.. one of
your messages as spam.. and track
i seem to recall that your server must conform too their standards as well, typical
aol crap or they will blacklist u or if someone else thats on your server (in a shared
enviroment) gets the bl then so do u. I have always heard to only shoot mail out in
lots of like 10-12 at a time so that u do
Reverse DNS would seem to be the most important factor, make sure your
mail server has RDNS setup.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 October 2004 01:28
To: CF-Talk
Subject: AOL and spam filtering
I use the CFMX cfmail tag to
I've recently had to go through the whole AOL white listing process. Our
mail server was experiencing a temporary block at AOL's mail servers. I
phoned AOL and they explained that this temporary block was due to the fact
that a certain percentage of the mail we were sending was being reported as
sp
OTECTED]
> Sent: 25 October 2004 12:35
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: AOL and spam filtering
>
> I've recently had to go through the whole AOL white listing
> process. Our mail server was experiencing a temporary block
> at AOL's mail servers. I phoned AOL and they
Yea, tell her to stop using aol... Even if you're using aol for dialup, you
can still use an external browser. Teach her how to start up an external
internet explorer, or better yet firefox.
Russ
-Original Message-
From: Andy Matthews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
