On 2003-02-13(Thu) 07:45:27 +0100, Austin Acton wrote:
> [Contrib-RPM]
> Name: csound Relocations: (not relocateable)
> Version : 4.23.4.2 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
> Release : 2mdk Build Date: Thu Feb 13 06:36:26 20
On 2003-01-24(Fri) 15:45:01 -0800, George Mitchell wrote:
> I am trying look over the latest version of Xfree but my system requires
> XFree-devel which in turn requires fontconfig-devel which is not
> currently available on the mirrors. Anyone know what is going on with
> this package?
[root@
On 2003-01-23(Thu) 18:35:36 -0800, Quel Qun wrote:
> Hi,
> New rpm are coming through but the old ones are not deleted (at least
> from uninett) so it's only a matter of time before they run out of
> space.
As an Mandrake employee (I think it's either warly or gc) said, Mandrake has
absolutely no
On 2003-01-22(Wed) 17:35:34 +0100, Frederic Crozat wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 11:14:50 -0500, Tim Lee wrote:
>
> >>
> >>Are you, by any chance, having a high security level ?
> >
> > I don't think so. In /etc/sysconfig/msec, SECURE_LEVEL is set at 2. What
> > file or directory would affect FAM
On 2003-01-20(Mon) 16:06:17 +0100, Benjamin Pflugmann wrote:
> I can see it, too. AFAICT, it's the border of the shadow. Both parts,
> the cursor itself and the shadow have their own transparency.
> Therefore, the left part of the cursor (without the shadow) is more
> transparent then the right par
On 2003-01-20(Mon) 11:39:43 +0100, Pascal Terjan wrote:
> >XFree86 only has shadow cursors shipped by default, AFAIK.
> >Besides, if non-shadowed version of cursor is used in Mandrake,
> >I'm afraid hundreds of complaint will pop up instead of this
> >one. :)
>
> BTW Is this a problem here or as t
On 2003-01-20(Mon) 11:11:35 +0100, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
> "[Bug 795]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-01-18 23:42 ---
> > Still not fixed in Beta 2.
>
> this is a feature request not a 'fix to be done' !!
XFree86 only has shadow c
On 2003-01-19(Sun) 21:00:36 -0500, Austin Acton wrote:
> I don't see any advantage of packaging the three icons as one archive.
> I use the following...
[]
> I don't see how that's any worse than one tarball. While it is longer,
> I don't think clarity should take a back-seat to brevity.
On 2003-01-16(Thu) 09:14:25 +, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > So you should know that these stupid requires are used to mimic what
> > David wants, but not what *I* want.
>
> That's simply not true, though. David said that Geramik shouldn't be
> *used* by people who use GNOME, which is perfectly t
On 2003-01-16(Thu) 09:14:32 +0100, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
> i have read the above thread and i agree on the stupid scripts
> destruction but i strongly disagree with these stupid requires as i
> did use geramik theme even if some think "it's just not another gtk
> theme"
So you should know that th
On 2003-01-16(Thu) 07:11:43 +0100, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
> "R.I.P. Deaddog" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > Is this possible?
> >
> > The simplest way I can think of is:
> >
> > Requires: kdebase
> > Conflicts: gnome-desktop gno
On 2003-01-15(Wed) 10:57:06 -0800, David Walser wrote:
> > That means you need to make Geramik cope with
> > people's
> > change in behavoir.
>
> Still doesn't make sense. I'll agree with one point
> you've made...if there were a way to have it install
> itself by default, but only activate for u
On 2003-01-14(Tue) 16:48:46 -0800, David Walser wrote:
> > Now I see the point. Geramik is trying to do what
> > Bluecurve did, right?
>
> Basically. More specifically, the color, font, and
> related settings that you configure for Keramik in KDE
> Control Center are what Geramik uses, rather tha
On 2003-01-14(Tue) 07:11:34 -0800, David Walser wrote:
> --- Frederic Crozat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This is right.. Theme packages should not screw up
> > default theme.. There
> > is no point for discussion on that..
>
> Geramik is not a normal theme. The only useful
> purpose it serves
On 2003-01-14(Tue) 06:33:17 -0800, David Walser wrote:
> > I think that this is not only broken, but *abusive*
> > too. Theme is a
> > per-user setting, why is it trying to make itself as
> > a global theme by
> > default?
>
> The idea is if you install this you *want* that. BUT,
^^
On 2003-01-14(Tue) 09:08:48 -0500, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 03:03:51PM +0100, Mandrakesoft packages database wrote:
> > better tool in e2fsprogs
>
> Which tool is it that is better?
I guess it is refering to /sbin/resize2fs.
Abel
--
Abel Cheung
GPG Key: (0xC67186FF) htt
On 2003-01-14(Tue) 05:17:05 -0800, David Walser wrote:
> --- Frederic Crozat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Name: Geramik
> > Version : 0.17
> > * Tue Jan 14 2003 Frederic Crozat
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 0.17-2mdk
> >
> > - Drop the gtkr
On 2003-01-14(Tue) 15:07:53 +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
> Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> > I'd like to have other people feedback on this point. If everyone agrees, the
> > plf package could be dropped.
>
> For >=9.0 yes.
Yup, even multibyte TTF work well here.
Abel
--
Abel Cheung
GPG Key: (0xC67186
On 2003-01-13(Mon) 22:13:32 +0100, Steffen Barszus wrote:
> urpmi kde-desktop would installs a bunch of kde-packages
> urpmi mandrake-development installs gcc / gcc-c++ kernel-header and so on.
> urpmi mandrake-simple-desktop could provide an small kde-desktop with only
> one programm for each ta
On 2003-01-02(Thu) 21:47:42 -0500, Quel Qun wrote:
> Is there any reason why the last 0.9.0 version is not used in
> cooker instead of the old version. It seems that only gnumeric
> requires libgda0, but nothing prevents libgda2 to be installed
> besides it.
>
> As a side note, libgnomedb2 should
On 2003-01-02(Thu) 16:48:11 -0500, Yura Gusev wrote:
> Stefan van der Eijk said:
> > --=-=-=
> > Name: automake1.6
> > Version : 1.7.2
> > URL : http://sources.redhat.com/automake/
> > --=-=-=
>
> Please update URL http://www.gnu.org/directory/GNU/automake.html
Bugzilla can be
grows:
* GXedit
* SVGATextMode
Anymore?
> R.I.P. Deaddog wrote:
[..]
> >Another good candidate to be removed is GXedit, which is unmaintained
> >since Jan 2000. I suppose nobody is using it?
--
Abel Cheung
GPG Key: (0xC67186FF) http://deaddog.org/gpg.asc
msg84525/pgp
On 2002-12-26(Thu) 07:04:45 -0500, Charles A Edwards wrote:
> > I suppose nobody is using it?
>
> I use it almost exclusively.
> It is mush faster to load than gedit.
>
> Even so, since the project itself is no longer being maintained and the
> URL for it no longer exists (only the 1998 sf dl p
Hi all,
Lately some packages were nuked from cooker (was it gc or warly who
did it?), so I may miss the boat.
Another good candidate to be removed is GXedit, which is unmaintained
since Jan 2000. I suppose nobody is using it?
--
Abel Cheung
GPG Key: (0xC67186FF) http://deaddog.org/gpg.asc
ms
On 2002-12-25(Wed) 04:16:21 -0600, Lonnie Borntreger wrote:
> > When I give the command:
> > rpmbuild --rebuild --target=athlon kernel-2.4.20.2mdk-1-1mdk.src.rpm
> > the process crashes after a couple of minutes...
> > Is this the correct command? I have also tried using
> > --target=athlo
On 2002-12-19(Thu) 10:22:51 +0100, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
> > I had this problem with gstreamer-plugins, without an explicit
> > libtoolize call the C++ plugins wouldn't link to libstdc++.
>
> Well, what we do in libtool is simply a workaround. You have to fix
> gstream-plugins there too. ;-)
On 2002-10-28(Mon) 16:06:55 +0100, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> > > ac-wrapper: ouch, couldn't call binary (/usr/bin/autom4te-2.13).
> > > autoheader-2.5x: /usr/bin/autom4te failed with exit status: 2
> >
> > I've had this problem before. Not sure what causes the problem. Try
>
> When my scrip
On 2002-12-12(Thu) 13:18:02 +0100, G?tz Waschk wrote:
> I think the %configure2_5x macro should be fixed. ATM it expands to:
> [goetz@klama SRPMS]$ rpm --eval %configure2_5x
>
> CONFIGURE_TOP="${CONFIGURE_TOP:-.}";
> CFLAGS="${CFLAGS:--O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -march=i586 -mcpu=pentiumpro
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Borsenkow Andrej wrote:
> > > In addition to the failure caused by the config bundled
> > > inside RPM :(
>
> Oh, I forgot to ask - what is the problem with distributed config?
> Without detailed study it looks more or less O.K.
>
> -andrej
It's this line:
source remote {
On 28 Apr 2002, Steve Fox wrote:
> Any idea why gconf-editor wouldn't be on my system? It used to be. I
> noticed something on one of the gnome lists about a build fix, so maybe
> that's why it's not in the current packages?
>
> libGConf2_4-1.1.9-2mdk
> libGConf1-devel-1.0.9-2mdk
> pkgconfig-0.1
On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 09:45:24PM +0200, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> >
> > The user or any script or something..
>
> In my case anyway, no. Nothing has edited these config files for
> which .rpmnew files are being created.
>
> Next time I do a
On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> When starting Gnome 2, I've got close to no menu items in the Gnome
> menu. That's with a "blank" user I created for testing.
>
> Is this expected?
>
> Alexander Skwar
Yes, I think fcrozat has posted many times on cooker list that
at least a compl
On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Geoffrey Lee wrote:
> There is some documentation here :
>
> http://www.balabit.hu/static/syslog-ng/reference/book1.html
>
> But it's not written in an easy-to-undertand format .. it seems to be
> quite technical.
>
> -- Geoff.
This reference is created around the t
On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Geoffrey Lee wrote:
> > > some known cases.
> >
> > http://www.balabit.hu/en/products/syslog-ng/
> >
> > There are also packages which will watch output from (ordinary or NG) syslog
> > and trigger on what they see.
>
> Better if you list out the available of the RPM
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
> >>Any idea's?
> >
> >Build fine here..
> >
> >Try look better at errors during compilation (errors you posted are not
> >causing any problem..
> >
> Doesn't build on my system either.
>
>http://eijk.homelinux.org/build/cooker/i586/problem/scrollk
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Goetz Waschk wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 23. April 2002, 17:10:08 Uhr MET, schrieb R.I.P. Deaddog:
> > On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Alan wrote:
> > > > extrusion: gle is in contrib (and things on main
[...]
> Why hasn't anyone of you looked at the spe
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Alan wrote:
> > xmatrix: of course it's the stupid copyright
>
> If this is correct, then someone is stretching copyright paranoia a little too
> far.
During the old days, it's pretty dangerous. When things
settle down, people tend to ignore it. But if it's brought
out a
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Alan wrote:
> > > In looking at the spec file for xscreensaver I notice that xmatrix and
> > > extrusion are set not to build.
> > >
> > > extrusion I can understand because it requires a specialized GL extrusion
> > > library.
> >
> > As a matter of fact, the gle library is
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Alan wrote:
> In looking at the spec file for xscreensaver I notice that xmatrix and
> extrusion are set not to build.
>
> extrusion I can understand because it requires a specialized GL extrusion
> library.
As a matter of fact, the gle library is in cooker too.
Abel
>
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
> Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> here is a temporary fix:
[...]
> > While on this topic: could you please decomment /usr/lib/perl5/man line in
> > /etc/man.conf ?
>
> too late for 2mdk.
> now, export LESSCHARSET=latin1 and le
On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Charles A Edwards wrote:
> > > > Regards.
> > > >
> > > Or you can get an unofficial mandrake based rpm at :
> > >
> > > ftp://ftp.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/distributions/contrib/texstar/Mandrake-8.2-i586
> >
> > nautilus-mozilla needs to be updated for a successful texstar upg
On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Han wrote:
> file /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libgail.so from install of libgail13-0.13-1mdk
>conflicts with file from package libgail11-0.11-1mdk
Please search cooker archive, there has been discussion on this problem.
> This must be an error:
> file /usr/share/vim/lang/fr
On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Charles A Edwards wrote:
> > --=-=-=
> > Name: scrollkeeper Relocations: (not relocateable)
> > Version : 0.3.7 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
> > Release : 1mdk Build Date: Fri Apr 19 15:16:24 2002
>
On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Frederic Crozat wrote:
> gail will be freezed for GNOME 2.0 release since it is part of the
> platform..
Oh, I have thought that it is similar to libgda etc -- won't freeze.
If it's freezing like other components do, then it's worthy to wait.
Then no more fix is necessary :
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Frederic Crozat wrote:
> I don't plan to split gail more : gail is not yet API/ABI frozen but it
> will be frozen for GNOME 2 release.. So, it won't add anything good to
> split gail now.. I'll wait for gail 1.0 and after, I'll see if we really
> need to slip it..
>
> In the
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Charles A Edwards wrote:
> > --=-=-=
> > Name: vim Relocations: (not relocateable)
> > Version : 6.1 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
> > Release : 5mdk Build Date: Thu Apr 18 14:51:39 2002
>
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Goetz Waschk wrote:
> > >> - Obsoletes nautilus-mozilla
> > > Why? Is the current nautilus-mozilla package too unstable?
> >
> > Is it not unstable, it doesn't work with nautilus 1.1.x ... (GNOME 1 vs
> > GNOME 2 ...)
> I thought I saw a Gnome2 package named nautilus-mozilla
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Goetz Waschk wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 18. April 2002, 15:45:30 Uhr MET, schrieb Frederic Crozat:
> > - Obsoletes nautilus-mozilla
> Why? Is the current nautilus-mozilla package too unstable?
nautilus-mozilla is a Gnome 1.x thing, and
nautilus-gtkhtml is a Gnoem 2.x thing.
--
.3-1mdk
cups-common-1.1.4-3mdk
libgimpprint1-4.2.1-5.pre5.1mdk
Abel
> R.I.P. Deaddog wrote:
>
> >
> >That means the above packages try to own /usr/share/locale/*,
> >which should belong to locales-* packages instead. I'm not
> >sure if KDE people will f
On 18 Apr 2002, Brice Figureau wrote:
> Installed it a few minutes ago, and it seems to work now.
> Another question: it seems that the bonobo-activation and the gconf2
> servers are not stopped when I log out, is it normal ?
Yes, just like what oafd and gconfd behave for Gnome 1.x. :/
--
Abel
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Geoffrey Lee wrote:
> > Attached a patch to check carefully whether $datadir/vim/lang
> > is a real directory before removing it.
> >
> > Besides, I remembered somebody suggested to keep /bin/vi link
> > to /bin/vim-minimal forever, so that one can still use vi if
> > /usr i
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Pascal Terjan wrote:
> Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> > Installing vim-common-6.1-4mdk screwed up all my
> > /usr/share/locale directory (thx Titi).
>
> Didn't it conflict with anything ?
>
> Here I got file conflicts with :
>
> kde-i18n-fr-2.2.2-1mdk
> koffice-i18n-fr-1.
On 18 Apr 2002, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> Since:
>
> [gc@bi ~] ls -l /usr/share/vim/lang
> lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 17 Apr 3 05:22 /usr/share/vim/lang ->
>/usr/share/locale/
>
> And now:
>
> [gc@bi ~] rpm -qplv /RPMS/vim-common-6.1-4mdk.i586.rpm | grep /usr/share/vim/lang$
On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, civileme wrote:
> >Not trying to start a flame war I would really like to find a good mta
> >and that doesn't include sendmail.
> >
> >First I would like to know if this vulnerability still exists or if it
> >has been fixed in mandrake?
> >
> >http://cr.yp.to/maildisasters/p
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Frederic Crozat wrote:
> --=-=-=
> Name: gnome-games Relocations: (not relocateable)
> Version : 1.90.2Vendor: MandrakeSoft
> Release : 1mdk Build Date: Thu Apr 11 11:36:49 2002
> --=-=-=
>
On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Charles A Edwards wrote:
> file /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libgail.so from install of
> libgail13-0.13-1mdk conflicts with file from package libgail11-0.11-1mdk
fcrozat, probably it's appropriate to split out
/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/lib{ferret,gail}.so into
another subpackag
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Todd Lyons wrote:
> A couple of rpms produced some strange output:
> scrollkeeperwarning: /etc/scrollkeeper.conf created as
> /etc/scrollkeeper.conf.rpmnew
> ##
> /usr/share/gnome/help/mailcheck/C/mailcheck.xml:3
On Sat, 13 Apr 2002, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> gnome-applets ##
> warning: failed to load external entity
>"/etc/gconf/schemas/{battstat*,cdplayer*,charpick*,drivemount*,geyes*,gkb*,gtik*,gweather*,mini-commander*,"
>
>»/etc/gconf/sch
On Sat, 13 Apr 2002, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> »Alexander Skwar« sagte am 2002-04-13 um 01:18:30 +0200 :
> > /usr/bin/scrollkeeper-update: /usr/local/share/omf: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht
>gefunden
> > /usr/bin/scrollkeeper-update: /opt/gnome/share/omf: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht
>gefunden
>
On Sat, 13 Apr 2002, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> I just got this when installing scrollkeeper-0.3.6-1mdk:
>
> scrollkeeper##
> /usr/share/gnome/help/mailcheck/C/mailcheck.xml:308: error: End tag : expected '>'
>
>
On Sat, 13 Apr 2002, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> gnome-media ##
> /usr/bin/scrollkeeper-update: /usr/local/share/omf: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht
>gefunden
> /usr/bin/scrollkeeper-update: /opt/gnome/share/omf: Datei oder Verzeichnis n
On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, Frederic Crozat wrote:
> > No way because GTK+ team has not said it is supported yet or no way for
> > some other reason, like you don't like gtk-x11 and gtk-linux-fb
> > conflicting with each other?
>
> Because it is not supported yet..
>
> > And why wait until it is "off
On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Frederic Crozat wrote:
> here is a quick status about GNOME 2 integration in cooker :
>
> the latest part of GNOME 2 main desktop package has been uploaded
> (gnome-panel) which replace the old gnome-core package...
Actually the situation is: gnome-core has been splitted in
On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> http://www.linux-mandrake.com/howtos/mdk-rpm/advanced.html#PREVERSIONS-NAMING
> but they are actually plenty of counter-examples in distro:
> openssh-3.1p1
> openssl-0.9.6c
> libhdf5_0-1.4.2p1
> etc...
No, the aforementioned problem only applies to
On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> > > >> openssh-3.1p1
> > > >> openssl-0.9.6c
> > > >> libhdf5_0-1.4.2p1
> > > >
> > > >These are not preversion : p is for patch level ... (ie openssh 3.1
> > > > patch level 1..)
> > >
> > > Nope.
> > > p for portable, http://www.openssh.org/portabl
On 29 Mar 2002, [ISO-8859-1] Frédéric Crozat wrote:
> > > > In /usr/share/aclocal/libxml.m4 one can find "#include "
> > > > two times. This is wrong, it has to be "#include
> > > ".
> > > For libxml2, when using AM_PATH_XML macro, xml2-config --cflags is used
> > > and add -I/usr/include/libxml
On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, Charles A Edwards wrote:
> urpmi is not handling all the depends needed to install, or more exactly the depend
>have depend which urpmi is not handling.
>
> # urpmi libgnomeprintui2.0_0 libgnomeprintui2.0_0-devel
> To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going
On Sat, 23 Mar 2002, Todd Lyons wrote:
> I'm getting errors uploading/downloading keys to *.keyserver.net with
> gnupg. The same keys work just fine with *.pgp.net (which eliminates
> variables like firewalls, diskspace, mailer configuration, etc).
> Running in debug mode, it works successfully
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, David Relson wrote:
> With the new Mandrake 8.2, gnome-core-1.4.0.6-12mdk.i586.rpm has a
> dependency on gnome-desktop - which doesn't exist.
>
> Here's the "failed dependencies" message:
>
> [root@walnut installed]# rpm -iv gnome-core-1.4.0.6-12mdk.i586.rpm
> error: faile
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Frederic Crozat wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 07:47:55PM +0100, Frederic Crozat wrote:
> >> Name: gtk+2.0 Relocations: (not
> >> relocateable) Version : 2.0.0 Vendor:
> >> MandrakeSoft Release : 1mdk
On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 04:21:27AM +0800, R.I.P. Deaddog wrote:
> > On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> >
> > Have you checked the CDs? 0.98.2 is already present in CD#2...
>
> Oh wow. There it is.
>
&g
On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> OK, so now that 8.2 out and Cooker is cooking again can we get
> GnomeICU updated to the 0.98.2 release?
Have you checked the CDs? 0.98.2 is already present in CD#2...
Abel
--
GPG Key: (0xC67186FF) http://deaddog.org/gpg.asc
On 21 Mar 2002, William Kenworthy wrote:
> Which cooker SRPM contains popt ? a dir *popt* on uio shows nothing,
> but popt* binary rpm's exist.
>
> BillK
It's the rpm-4.0.x source RPM.
Abel
On Sun, 17 Mar 2002, Warly wrote:
> So the datum is: "release date is March the 15th".
>
> Now we need to do it in this timeframe (and we are the 17th), and
> we have no other choice.
>
> In a few days 8.2 updates will be released, and them you will have
> the real stable and polished distro yo
On Sat, 16 Mar 2002, Hoyt wrote:
> When installed, gives message that "group nobody does not exist, running as
> root."
Yes, nobody has already been replaced with nogroup, I assume. You
can have a look at setup-2.2.0 changelog.
BTW, I'd want to ask if you can help me test a new junkbuster.
My
New gcal source RPM is uploaded to /incoming:
===
Name: gcal Relocations: (not relocateable)
Version : 3.01 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
Release : 5mdk
The following signed package is uploaded to /incoming.
=
Name: jasper Relocations: (not relocateable)
Version : 1.500.4 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
Release : 1mdk
On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Frederic Crozat wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> > what about GNOME 2.0 ?! Shall it be included in MDK8.2 it is
> > currently Beta2
>
> And final version will be May 1st 2002 ...
>
> No comment..
Please blame me here, I promised fcrozat that I can package it,
but not delivered a
On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Kimmo Hovi wrote:
> I just uploaded AfterStep 1.8.11-2mdk source rpm.
>
> Working on updating the default start menu. Sadly none of the
> active developers use the default menu (wonder why ;), so
> it's ages old. Wonder if this will be included in 8.2
Better yet, provide it
On 12 Mar 2002, Bryan Paxton wrote:
> locales: localedef is hrm broken (at least from my end), segfaults,
> reason unknown.
> Search the mail archives, I made a few posts about this.
>
> armagetron: eh, bad code or patch iirc
>
> ImageMagick: Compiles fine, but there's some wierd perl rege
On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Vincent Meyer, MD wrote:
> Why does apache need lynx? Trying to unselect lynx during package selection
> in RC1 says it will de-select about a dozen packages, including apache,
> apache-conf, apache-mod-perl, etc.
excerpt from /etc/init.d/apache:
LYNX="lynx -dum
On Sat, 9 Mar 2002, Warly wrote:
> Tomorrow we will be in deep freeze.
>
> That's mean that no package upload will be allowed
> except for severe showstoppers.
>
> RC1 contains 2 important pbs that are now nearly fixed,
> symlinks are broken on CDs with supermount enable (fixed in
> the latest
On Sat, 9 Mar 2002, huug wrote:
> > is it possible to remove a wrong dependency from a rpm package?
> >
> > I'd like to test further but can't install KDE because
> > kdeutils-2.2.2-24mdk.i586.rpm misses lha and I won't wait for the
> > update. ;-)
>
> Well, LHA ain't that big:
The point is, *w
On 9 Mar 2002, Borsenkow Andrej wrote:
> I can complete list of previous URLs by hitting TAB in URL input field.
> I can also select one of them with ENTER but Galeon starts download
> immediately. How can I "select for editing", so that I can change it.
A quick workaround is to press ESC quick
On 9 Mar 2002, Bryan Paxton wrote:
> > It perhaps might be the latest gcc, specifically libstdc++, but it
> > could be my optimizations that made something in libstdc++ fubar...
> I'm
> > going to compile for i686, but with the default rpm opt flags and see
> > what's what : )
> >
> > I'll em
> --=-=-=
> Name: textutilsRelocations: (not relocateable)
> Version : 2.0.17Vendor: MandrakeSoft
> Release : 5mdk Build Date: Thu Mar 7 15:54:46 2002
> --=-=-=
>
> * Thu Mar 07 2002 Thierry Vignaud <[EMAIL
On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Borsenkow Andrej wrote:
> install-info: warning: no entries found for
> `/usr/share/info/coreutils.info.bz2'; nothing deleted
> install-info: menu item `yes' already exists, for file `sh-utils'
> install-info: menu item `yes' already exists, for file `sh-utils'
Yes, confirmed
On 5 Mar 2002, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> > > > $ rpm -qa | grep libwmf0.2
> > > >
> > > > libwmf0.2_1-0.2.1-1mdk
> > > > libwmf0.2_2-0.2.2-1mdk
> > >
> > > That's the point of the "new lib policy".
> >
> > So we just get more and more and more libs forever? Is this why I have
>
> Yes, we
On 4 Mar 2002, andre wrote:
> > There are many cases that, even though a brand name has an official
> > translation, people just ignore the translation and uses English
> > brand name.
> >
> > On the contrary, I've seen other cases that, once a name has a
> > translation, nobody uses the origina
On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, Keld [iso-8859-1] Jørn Simonsen wrote:
> > > The gettext version delivered with beta3 was 0.10.40
> > > It would be nice if the new gettext version was delivered instead.
> > > The recent version is 0.11.something, pablo would know more.
> >
> > I guess nobody would like such
On 4 Mar 2002, andre wrote:
> > > Is it *really* necessary to translate 'frozen bubble' to 'bulle glacées' in
> > > menu :-) ?
> >
> > That really depends on the translator's taste or translation
> > team's policy. If you really dislike it, you can talk to the
> > translator of menu-messages...
On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, Keld [iso-8859-1] Jørn Simonsen wrote:
> The gettext version delivered with beta3 was 0.10.40
> It would be nice if the new gettext version was delivered instead.
> The recent version is 0.11.something, pablo would know more.
>
> keld
I guess nobody would like such change in
On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> Is it *really* necessary to translate 'frozen bubble' to 'bulle glacées' in
> menu :-) ?
>
That really depends on the translator's taste or translation
team's policy. If you really dislike it, you can talk to the
translator of menu-messages.
A
On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, Keld [iso-8859-1] Jørn Simonsen wrote:
> Nice to have: I see that there are a number of different
> supports for different file types with vim. It would be nice
> if the .po macros were also supported out of the box.
> Pablo even advertises the .po-macros on the Mandrake
> tr
On 2 Mar 2002, Bryan Paxton wrote:
> This patch changes part of the buildrequires in the latest xmms.spec.
[...]
> Anyway, here's the patch, nice and small : )
> -BuildRequires: libpanel_applet-devel libglib-devel libgtk+-devel libxml-devel
>libvorbis-devel libogg-devel
> +BuildRequires:
On 24 Feb 2002, Daouda LO wrote:
> > > > > Name: libgtop Relocations: (not relocateable)
> > > > > Version : 1.0.13Vendor: MandrakeSoft
> > > > > Release : 2mdk Build Date: Sat Feb 23 05:12:26
>2002
> > > >
On 23 Feb 2002, Daouda LO wrote:
> > > Name: libgtop Relocations: (not relocateable)
> > > Version : 1.0.13Vendor: MandrakeSoft
> > > Release : 2mdk Build Date: Sat Feb 23 05:12:26 2002
> > > --=-=-=
> > > *
On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Schlomo Schwartz wrote:
> > surely libmysql10-devel-3.23.47-4mdk.i586.rpm
>
> Why has this package been renamed? Even Red Hat's
> rawhide still calls it mysql-devel (not to mention
> what RPMs you can download from mysql.com). I just
> don't understand why these package na
My email was rejected. This is a re-send.
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> > Because common-licenses is required by basesystem. It should always be
> > on your system, so there is really no need to list it.
>
> Well, if I remove basesystem (which is required by nothing), I could
My mail was rejected before. This is a re-send.
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
> These are the BR for the current (1.3.12-1mdk) package:
[..]
> gdk-pixbuf-devel >= 0.7.0
> gtk+-devel >= 1.2.5
> gnome-libs-devel >= 1.0.59
>
> Unless there is a REAL need to specify the requi
101 - 200 of 648 matches
Mail list logo
