On 04/06/2024 02:08, Chris M wrote:
I am needing a "refresher course" on mail clients that use the .mbox
format to store emails.
It's been years since I've used this kind of mail client.
You may configure local IMAP server (e.g. dovecot) to store your
archive. It allows
On Mon 03 Jun 2024 at 14:08:46 (-0500), Chris M wrote:
> I am needing a "refresher course" on mail clients that use the .mbox
> format to store emails.
> It's been years since I've used this kind of mail client.
>
> Is there any "dangers" I need
Felix Miata wrote:
As I'm up 24/7, I never bother going "offline" in SM.
What I meant was, I always click in SM:
File > Offline > Work Offline
That way SM isn't doing anything in the background while I am compacting
folders. OLD bad habit, I know.
Chris M composed on 2024-06-03 14:08 (UTC-0500):
> Is there any "dangers" I need to know about? Like, keeping the mailbox a
> certain size?
> or a certain amount of emails per folder etc?
...
> I always go offline, and then compact my folders after I get done
> reading emails.
In SM at least, s
I am needing a "refresher course" on mail clients that use the .mbox
format to store emails.
It's been years since I've used this kind of mail client.
Is there any "dangers" I need to know about? Like, keeping the mailbox a
certain size?
or a certain amount of em
Andrei POPESCU writes:
> Here's the snippet I use:
>
>
> # Use everything that looks like a mailbox in ~/Maildir/
> # except the ones explicitely excluded
> mailboxes ! + `\
> for file in ~/Maildir/.*; do \
> box=$(basename "$file"); \
> if [ ! "$box" = '.' -a ! "$box" = '..' \
>
On Lu, 22 oct 12, 15:41:48, lee wrote:
>
> Have you looked at the documentation of mutt? It talks about mail
> folders. It also talks about directories. It cannot rename folders or
> directories and it cannot (re-)move them (the argument is that mutt
> isn't a file manager), and it doesn't real
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:10:09AM +0200, Erwan David wrote:
> On 21/10/12 10:51, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> >
> > Could you please elaborate on that? As far as I can tell it's just a
> > matter of configuring mutt correctly (the defaults are not really
> > optimal). Mutt + Gmail, now that is a cha
Chris Bannister writes:
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 05:58:59PM +0200, lee wrote:
>> Mutt isn't designed with the concept of folders in mind. It merely
>> acknowledges the concept because the mails need to be stored
>> /somewhere/.
>
> You mean it doesn't work out of the box and requires some confi
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 05:58:59PM +0200, lee wrote:
> Mutt isn't designed with the concept of folders in mind. It merely
> acknowledges the concept because the mails need to be stored
> /somewhere/.
You mean it doesn't work out of the box and requires some configuration?
Hey, JFYI most good soft
Andrei POPESCU writes:
> On Sb, 20 oct 12, 06:54:21, lee wrote:
>>
>> Wally wants to learn some C programming, thus I suggested he learn emacs
>> and might use gnus and try out vim and/or joe, whatever he likes best.
>> Perhaps I should have mentioned mutt as well, but mutt with imap can be
>> r
On Du, 21 oct 12, 11:10:09, Erwan David wrote:
> On 21/10/12 10:51, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > Mutt + Gmail, now that is a challenge!
> >
> Not really, the challenge is mutt + heavy html emails...
> GMail is easy once you activate imap and use mutt as an imap reader (in
> that case it's better to u
On 21/10/12 10:51, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Sb, 20 oct 12, 06:54:21, lee wrote:
>>
>> Wally wants to learn some C programming, thus I suggested he learn emacs
>> and might use gnus and try out vim and/or joe, whatever he likes best.
>> Perhaps I should have mentioned mutt as well, but mutt with i
On Sb, 20 oct 12, 06:54:21, lee wrote:
>
> Wally wants to learn some C programming, thus I suggested he learn emacs
> and might use gnus and try out vim and/or joe, whatever he likes best.
> Perhaps I should have mentioned mutt as well, but mutt with imap can be
> rather awkward.
Could you please
On Fri, 5 Nov 2010 07:01:28 + (UTC)
Camaleón wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 16:35:31 -0400, Celejar wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 15:48:30 + (UTC) Camaleón wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> >> with mbox and searching strings in Icedove is bit slow if mbox files
> >> are big (measured in GiB :-
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 16:35:31 -0400, Celejar wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 15:48:30 + (UTC) Camaleón wrote:
>
> ...
>
>> with mbox and searching strings in Icedove is bit slow if mbox files
>> are big (measured in GiB :-P).
>
> If you're still doing on-demand searching, have you considered us
On Tuesday 23 March 2010 03:29:05 Ron Johnson wrote:
> Next time you attach such a file, I suggest that you add a ".txt" so
> that your email/webmail app knows that it is a text file, instead of
> base64 encoded application/octet-stream.
>
> (Iceweasel/Thunderbird seems to "peek" into it, probably
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:29:05PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 2010-03-22 21:56, Mike Viau wrote:
>> Attached for you convenience!
>> sourced from: Debian Lenny
>
> Next time you attach such a file, I suggest that you add a ".txt" so
> that your email/webmail app knows that it is a text file,
Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:29:05 -0500 wrote:
>
> On 2010-03-22 21:56, Mike Viau wrote:
> > Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:29:01 -0400 wrote:
> > >
> > > On 23:37 Fri 19 Mar , Mike Viau wrote:
> > > > > > My output with the suggestion above.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > debian:~# dpkg --dry-run --pu
On 2010-03-22 21:56, Mike Viau wrote:
Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:29:01 -0400 wrote:
>
> On 23:37 Fri 19 Mar , Mike Viau wrote:
> > > > My output with the suggestion above.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > debian:~# dpkg --dry-run --purge $(join -v2 <(awk '{if
($2=="install")
> > > > print $1}' < debian-
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 12:22:38PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Mail clients known to reply funky:
>
> Outlook, Outlook Express (top posted by default, no viable fix except
> switching)
>
> GMail (breaks threading, any workarounds??).
SMTP ;)
Regards,
Andrei
--
If yo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Arafangion wrote:
> George Borisov wrote:
>
>> Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
>>
[snip]
> You may be required to use the proprietary "Ximian Evolution" which is
> the same as the free version, but it contains a module that allows it to
> talk to Exchan
George Borisov wrote:
>Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
>
>
>>Hi,
>>Which other e-mail clients, other than Evolution, can I access
>>MS-exchange accounts with? I tried and failed with Thunderbird.
>>
>>
>
>I use Thunderbird with our Exchange through
Dmitri Minaev wrote:
>
> And both Evolution and Thunderbird as IMAP clients are PITA to work
> with . Thunderbird sometimes can't copy the outgoing message into Sent
> Items folder [1].
Yup, but this seems to be more of a problem with Exchange IMAP
component. In the same client I am connected to m
Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> Hi,
> Which other e-mail clients, other than Evolution, can I access
> MS-exchange accounts with? I tried and failed with Thunderbird.
I use Thunderbird with our Exchange through IMAP. Depends if your server
has it enabled.
Hope this helps,
--
George Bori
Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> Hi,
> Which other e-mail clients, other than Evolution, can I access
> MS-exchange accounts with? I tried and failed with Thunderbird.
I use Thunderbird with our Exchange through IMAP. Depends if your server
has it enabled.
Hope this helps,
--
Georg
Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> Hi,
> Which other e-mail clients, other than Evolution, can I access
> MS-exchange accounts with? I tried and failed with Thunderbird.
MS Outlook on Wine ?
Ace.
--
Random Quotes From Megas XLR
Coop: You see? The mysteries of the Universe are revealed
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 07:25:32PM +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
>Which other e-mail clients, other than Evolution, can I access
>MS-exchange accounts with? I tried and failed with Thunderbird.
If the Exchange server is recent enough it supports IMAP. Talk to your
system admin and ask
desktop. There was a commercial solution from HP, called
OpenMail, but it is not available anymore.
You may find something useful on this page, though:
http://dcs.nac.uci.edu/~strombrg/exchange.html
On 5/23/06, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Which other e-mail clients, othe
Hi,
Which other e-mail clients, other than Evolution, can I access
MS-exchange accounts with? I tried and failed with Thunderbird.
malebo
Hi,
Which other e-mail clients, other than Evolution, can I access
MS-exchange accounts with? I tried and failed with Thunderbird.
malebo
Tom Allison wrote:
I've been using squirrelmail as my web-mail interface.
But I'm wondering what else it out there in Debian packages.
Horde is 'da bomb. In addition to webmail, it also has a password
changer (no need for shell access to change password),
addressbook/contact manager (can connect
Take a look at http://turtle.ee.ncku.edu.tw/openwebmail/
It's pretty full-featured, and runs fairly nicely there's an online
demo on that page somewhere that you can try out to get a feel for it.
Tom Allison wrote:
I've been using squirrelmail as my web-mail interface.
But I'm wondering what
I've been using squirrelmail as my web-mail interface.
But I'm wondering what else it out there in Debian packages.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 22 Dec 2002, Shawn Lamson wrote:
> Did you right click on "Mailbox (MH)" folder and "rebuild folder tree" ?
No, but that does seem to fix it. I wonder why it keeps getting off in
its counts.
> >http://hank.org/images/sylpheed.png
> That image looks just like mine - it looks lik
On Sat, 21 Dec 2002 21:12:41 -0800
Bill Moseley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 08:31 AM 12/18/02 +, Carlos Sousa wrote:
>
> Sorry for taking so long to get back to this -- it's been one of those weeks.
>
> >On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 18:00:25 -0800 Bill Moseley wrote:
> >> That version of Sylpheed
At 08:31 AM 12/18/02 +, Carlos Sousa wrote:
Sorry for taking so long to get back to this -- it's been one of those weeks.
>On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 18:00:25 -0800 Bill Moseley wrote:
>> That version of Sylpheed doesn't seem to deal well with counting new
>> messages, and when I use the threaded vi
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 18:00:25 -0800 Bill Moseley wrote:
> That version of Sylpheed doesn't seem to deal well with counting new
> messages, and when I use the threaded view I seem to miss new
> messages. I need to figure out how to show messages in *received*
> order.
Must be a temporary breakage.
At 06:33 PM 12/17/02 -0500, Shawn Lamson wrote:
>Short answer yes it can be used withouth KDE; as to your particular
problem I don't know... have you tried sylpheed-claws as a mail agent? It
is a lot lighter than say Evolution.
I have tried sylpheed-claws -- I've tried using it a few times, quite
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 08:37:06PM -0800, Craig Dickson wrote:
> begin Alan James quotation:
>
> > I'd like to give maildir a go, so how do I convert MH to MailDir ?
>
> If you use procmail, just set up new empty maildir folders corresponding
> to each of your old MH folders, edit .procmailrc t
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 12:25:31AM -0500, Chris Hilts wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 08:37:06PM -0800, Craig Dickson wrote:
> > (and to know that they're in maildir format), then run all your old
> > messages back through procmail again.
>
> I believe procmail comes with a utility called 'formai
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 08:37:06PM -0800, Craig Dickson wrote:
> (and to know that they're in maildir format), then run all your old
> messages back through procmail again.
I believe procmail comes with a utility called 'formail' which you might
find useful for this.
Chris Hilts
[EMAIL PROTECTED
begin Alan James quotation:
> I'd like to give maildir a go, so how do I convert MH to MailDir ?
If you use procmail, just set up new empty maildir folders corresponding
to each of your old MH folders, edit .procmailrc to use the new folders
(and to know that they're in maildir format), then ru
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 12:59:15PM -0800, Craig Dickson wrote:
> begin Alan James quotation:
>
> > Are you still using MH folders ? How'd you get mutt to show a list of MH
> > folders with the new message count for each ?
>
> I converted my MH folders to maildir and now I use that. Mutt seems
begin Alan James quotation:
> Are you still using MH folders ? How'd you get mutt to show a list of MH
> folders with the new message count for each ?
I converted my MH folders to maildir and now I use that. Mutt seems to
handle maildir better, and it's a better format in general (you don't
h
sic question, why do I need two different
> mail clients? Aside from the lack of point-and-click to select messages,
> mutt has a pretty decent UI, and it's customizable enough that I was
> able to work around the things that annoyed me the most about it. So
> now I just use
last time i ran mutt, and Sylpheed shows
> whats new since I last ran sylpheed.
>
> This is only a very minor annoyance though, and I think I'll stick
> with this configuration for a while.
I found it a major annoyance, but maybe I just receive a lot more mail
than you do.
To me, also,
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 21:36:18 -0500
Bob Thibodeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I thought I'd try Sylpheed after seing mention of it on this
> list, but never felt like configuring another client. Now that
> I've read it doesn't play nice with mutt, I'll just remove it.
I've got it working reasonab
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002 02:00:03 -0600
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I dunno. Don't have it installed anymore. Pretty recent version
> > > of the non-claws version (last month or so). The memory leak was
> > > a slow but substantial one. I was often leaving Sylpheed running
> > > for
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002 04:53:02 -0300 Gustavo Noronha Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 14:06:10 -0800
> "Eric G. Miller" wrote:
>
> > I dunno. Don't have it installed anymore. Pretty recent version
> > of the non-claws version (last month or so). The memory leak was
> > a s
On 24 Feb 2002 20:28:56 +
Patrick Kirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-02-24 at 19:55, Bill Moseley wrote:
> > At 11:25 AM 02/24/02 -0800, Eric G. Miller wrote:
>
> >
> > Although I read that IMAP can be slow if you have many mailboxes (I have
> > almost 100), and hundreds of messa
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 14:06:10 -0800
"Eric G. Miller" wrote:
> I dunno. Don't have it installed anymore. Pretty recent version
> of the non-claws version (last month or so). The memory leak was
> a slow but substantial one. I was often leaving Sylpheed running
> for days, but after a couple it w
swimming a bit trying to limit my choices of mail clients to test.
>
> I'm wondering if someone can help narrow my choices.
>
> Background: Like many, I'm coming from a Windows environment. I've got
> three linux machines under my desk and for a year now I've boot
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 06:30:17PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 21:56:23 -0800
> "Eric G. Miller" wrote:
>
> > Possibly dead?
> >
> > > Sylpheed: (which I just read about on this list).
> >
> > Works pretty well. Is fairly lightweight. I noticed it leaks a
> >
On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 21:56:23 -0800
"Eric G. Miller" wrote:
> Possibly dead?
>
> > Sylpheed: (which I just read about on this list).
>
> Works pretty well. Is fairly lightweight. I noticed it leaks a
> significant amount of memory over time (days). No idea about
> IMAP support (think
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 09:41:54 -0800
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 09:33:55AM -0800, Craig Dickson wrote:
> >
> > Sylpheed is quite nice. I don't use it myself because I don't want to be
> > dependent on an X app to read my mail (I use mutt), but my wife switched
> > to Sylphee
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 09:22:22 -0800
Craig Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> begin Michael P. Soulier quotation:
>
> > Sylpheed is excellent I'm told.
>
> Sylpheed is quite nice. I don't use it myself because I don't want to be
> dependent on an X app to read my mail (I use mutt), but my
On Sun, 2002-02-24 at 14:28, Patrick Kirk wrote:
> Evolution is a heavy application and has some quirks. but it is a very
> good IMAP client in that it allows shortcuts to your frequently used
> mailboxes and only asks you to select from mailboxes as opposed to all
> files.
I run an IMAP server
On Sun, 2002-02-24 at 19:55, Bill Moseley wrote:
> At 11:25 AM 02/24/02 -0800, Eric G. Miller wrote:
>
> Although I read that IMAP can be slow if you have many mailboxes (I have
> almost 100), and hundreds of messages a day.
>
>
I have the same problem. The truth is that most mail cleints that
At 11:25 AM 02/24/02 -0800, Eric G. Miller wrote:
>I believe nmh uses .mh_sequences or some such. So, that would probably
>be the "standard" way. Sylpheed uses it's own sequence file, so it
>won't even jibe with the mh way of managing mail. This is something
>the Sylpheed folks should fix. I tr
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 01:00:15PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 10:05:13 -0800 Craig Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > begin [EMAIL PROTECTED] quotation:
> >
> > > Is there a debian package for Sylpheed?
> >
> > Yes, in Woody and Sid.
> >
> > > BTW -- why would using
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 10:05:13 -0800 Craig Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> begin [EMAIL PROTECTED] quotation:
>
> > Is there a debian package for Sylpheed?
>
> Yes, in Woody and Sid.
>
> > BTW -- why would using an X mail application exclude you from also
> > running mutt?
>
> It's not so
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 09:41:54 -0800
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 09:33:55AM -0800, Craig Dickson wrote:
> >
> > Sylpheed is quite nice. I don't use it myself because I don't want to be
> > dependent on an X app to read my mail (I use mutt), but my wife switched
> > to Sylphee
begin [EMAIL PROTECTED] quotation:
> Is there a debian package for Sylpheed?
Yes, in Woody and Sid.
> BTW -- why would using an X mail application exclude you from also
> running mutt?
It's not so much "prevented" as "made sufficiently painful". I tried
using Sylpheed and mutt together severa
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 09:33:55AM -0800, Craig Dickson wrote:
>
> Sylpheed is quite nice. I don't use it myself because I don't want to be
> dependent on an X app to read my mail (I use mutt), but my wife switched
> to Sylpheed after we decided that Outlook Express was too dangerous, and
> she's
At 08:46 AM 02/24/02 -0800, Wendell Cochran wrote:
>> So, to start off with, I'm looking to make the transition to full-time
>Linux easy by finding similar tools to I'm used to using.
>[snip]
>
>Similarities can be confusing. Maybe -- maybe -- you'd do better
>to accept differences, even seek them
begin Michael P. Soulier quotation:
> Sylpheed is excellent I'm told.
Sylpheed is quite nice. I don't use it myself because I don't want to be
dependent on an X app to read my mail (I use mutt), but my wife switched
to Sylpheed after we decided that Outlook Express was too dangerous, and
s
> Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 21:38:37 -0800
> From: Bill Moseley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[snip]
> . . . Like many, I'm coming from a Windows environment. I've got
> three linux machines under my desk and for a year now I've booted Win98
> used basically only browsers and Eudora (3.0) on my Win9
On 23/02/02 Bill Moseley did speaketh:
> My head is swimming a bit trying to limit my choices of mail clients to test.
My personal preference is Mutt, but coming from browsers and Eudora, you
might want to try something simpler to begin with.
Evolution is not ready, IMHO. Even at
On Sun, 2002-02-24 at 05:55, Timothy R. Butler wrote:
>
> > I was using RedHat 7.2 for a while and I actually liked the KDE setup,
> > although a bit heavy weight. But I also like how light-weight of a setup I
> > now have with Debian. (I suppose I'll need a desktop environment at some
> > point
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 09:38:37PM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
> And not related to email, anyone have a replacement suggestion (other than
> Emacs ;) for my old basic friend on the windows side of Program File Editor
> (pfe)?
Don't waste time with emacs and vi. Try jed. It's the best console
editor
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 09:38:37PM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
> I was using RedHat 7.2 for a while and I actually liked the KDE setup,
> although a bit heavy weight. But I also like how light-weight of a setup I
> now have with Debian. (I suppose I'll need a desktop environment at some
> point.)
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 09:38:37PM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
> Evolution:
No comment other than lots of eye candy and resource demands.
Several like it. It and its brethren nautilus are just to
resource intensive for my old hardware.
> Mahogany:
No idea.
> Aethera:
No idea.
) a try. It feels much lighter in
Debian than RedHat. The nice thing is you could stick to a very light weight
KDE here - maybe just kdebase, konqueror, and konsole - or something like
that.
> So, for graphical mail clients: Knowing that I'm coming from a simple life
> with Eudora (
My head is swimming a bit trying to limit my choices of mail clients to test.
I'm wondering if someone can help narrow my choices.
Background: Like many, I'm coming from a Windows environment. I've got
three linux machines under my desk and for a year now I've booted Win98
on Tue, Dec 25, 2001 at 11:53:42AM +, Phillip Deackes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> On 24 Dec 2001 17:44:44 -0500
>
> > Erik Steffl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > No, but when a business chooses degenerate mail and forces everyone to
> > use it, I'd be pretty suspicious of high-level idioc
On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Carel Fellinger wrote:
I now there is gnupop-3d.
I used it and it worked quite good
> On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 08:22:29PM -0500, Dwight Johnson wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Dec 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ...
> > What is the name of the debian pop package? I do not see on
On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 08:22:29PM -0500, Dwight Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Dec 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
> What is the name of the debian pop package? I do not see one in the list
> of packages. I do not want imap.
"apt-cache search pop" will give pages full of packages,
you'll have a li
On Mon, 11 Dec 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for your reply.
> On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 03:33:58PM -0500, Dwight Johnson wrote:
> ...
> > When she tries to read her mail using Eudora, she gets a message that
> > her connection has been refused. When she tries to send mail, she gets
> > a m
Hi Dwight,
read this on debian-user, but there was a different mailing-list
refered to in the To: header, so I'm cc-ing you/debian-user instead.
On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 03:33:58PM -0500, Dwight Johnson wrote:
...
> When she tries to read her mail using Eudora, she gets a message that
> her connec
I must configure my debian box so my wife can read and send her mail
using Eudora from her Win95 box which is delivered to her mailbox
(/var/mail/user) on the debian box using fetchmail/procmail/exim.
Normal TCP/IP networking is already working on the network. The debian
box is configured as an I
Well,
there is one email client that will do most of what Outlook Express does.
XFmail. Not used alone though, but together with exim and fetchmail it works
great for me. I have two accounts dealt with fine using XFmail. Using filters,
and the option to set a custom "From" for every folder it is v
Sorry. Your message could not be delivered to:
Jorge Araya (Mailbox or Conference is full.)
Sorry. Your message could not be delivered to:
Jorge Araya (Mailbox or Conference is full.)
Stephen Pitts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> See /usr/doc/exim/filter.txt.gz
> It answered all of my questions.
See also "info exim-filter".
--
Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP=E80E0D04F521A094 532B97F5D64E3930
>> "SP" == Stephen Pitts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SP> Windows is designed for the causal user. That's great,
SP> initially. There is no learning curve,
Hahahahahahah.
Sorry. I work parttime on phone support to pay for my studies. I can
assure you, that a current Linux is no more complicated
>> "JB" == Jim B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dispite some vocal mails from other users, I have a simple solution
for you.
JB> Someone sends to joe and the mail is filtered into his
JB> mailbox... meanwhile, tom's mail is filtered into his mailbox.
No problem. postilion does this without any pro
On Sun, May 23, 1999 at 02:25:47AM -0400, Sean wrote:
> I've been wanting to set up fetchmail/exim/mutt but I've been having a
> hell of a time figuring out the syntax for the .forward file. The docs
> talk about using the .forward file, but nowhere is there an example of
> what one should look li
u believe that you can't work any other way. Don't yell, I'm
> > not responsible for your problems. In the past, Linux users faced
> > with a problem have programmed around it. Thus, we have a dozen
> > different window managers and a dozen different mail clients. B
John Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't want to break up this lively discourse but has anyone here
> tried
> the IshMail Mail client? I am about to try it but want to know if
> there
> are homemade .debs around or if I will have to make them myself.
Yes, I use it all the time. I posted h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 23 May 1999 05:06:47 -0400, Jan Muszynski wrote:
>Have you tried running this under Wine?
Yes, doesn't install, doesn't run.
- --
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343
On 22 May 99, at 19:03, Steve Lamb
wrote about Re: mail clients:
[snipped to conserve bandwidth]
>
> A perfect example of this is PMMail98 on OS/2 & Windows. Yeah, I know,
> Windows, GUI, ick. But my point is not the GUI, not the mouse, not the
> keyboard, not
I don't want to break up this lively discourse but has anyone here tried
the IshMail Mail client? I am about to try it but want to know if there
are homemade .debs around or if I will have to make them myself.
--
John Foster
AdVance-Computing Systems
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 22 May 1999 23:16:10 -0700 (PDT), George Bonser wrote:
>In this case, I don't think you know what you are talking about. CNC does
Whoops, you're right. I misunderstood what a friend of mine was showing
me. :)
- --
Steve C. La
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 23 May 1999 02:06:13 -0400, Allan M. Wind wrote:
>2 is the better option, it doesn't look like mutt likes remote smtp
>servers but I could be wrong (just skimmed the docs). There are other
>MUA that does (communicator for instance).
Now
On 1999-05-22 23:45, Stephen Pitts wrote:
> Why not just have multiple instances of Communicator?
That's trouble. To my understanding there is only one lock file for
the .netscape directory which would render concurrent access either
inoperable or a disaster.
> Linux users faced with a problem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 22 May 1999 22:23:24 -0700 (PDT), George Bonser wrote:
>I think Concentric is in your area and their DSL will allow you to do
>this.
Concentric gets their DSL through another company which does not. Need
at least the 4th tier up at abou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 22 May 1999 22:07:56 -0700 (PDT), George Bonser wrote:
>Are you in the SF Bay area? (That Netcom comment led me to think so).
>idiom.com will sell you a clean pipe and a block of IP addresses. They
>were one of the few companies I found in the
On 23-May-99 George Bonser wrote:
>
> xfmail handles multiple pop3 accounts at the same time. I just tried that
> mahogany program ... caused me to loose about 2000 old messages ... gone,
> evaporated, dead.
>
> It does not work well with any large mailboxes.
I am using xfmail too. I tried Mah
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 23 May 1999 00:09:23 -0400, Jim B wrote:
>This is not about "what OS is for whom," "who is what kind of user," or
>anything like that. The question is: "Does a client with these features
>exist for the Linux platform?"
No.
>If one does
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
