On 1/31/07, S Destika <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I agree with some of your post, but the rest is
> simply untrue. There are plenty of design and
> implementation discussions. There have been plenty of
> good and bad words exchanged as well about particular
> features, etc. There have been dis
On 1/31/07, Stephen Harpster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm the first to agree that the transition to Mercurial, getting the
source outside Sun's firewall, is going slower than I want.
How do you want to stimulate the growth of the Opensolaris community?
That may be more important right now. Op
.6 with SMTP id t6mr1425644ugg.1170270097449;
Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:01:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.67.16.16 with HTTP; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:01:37 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 20:01:37 +0100
From: "Josh Hurst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 1/31/07, Glynn Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey,
Josh Hurst wrote:
> On 1/31/07, Stephen Harpster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm the first to agree that the transition to Mercurial, getting the
>> source outside Sun's firewall, is going slowe
On 2/2/07, Stephen Harpster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you want it to go faster, then participate.
Many of us are waiting that the first community project integrates.
We'd like to see that Opensolaris.org is really an Open organisation
where community projects can succeed. So far you lack a
On 2/2/07, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Josh Hurst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/2/07, Stephen Harpster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you want it to go faster, then participate.
>
> Many of us are waiting that the first commu
On 2/2/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>And how far have the star or ksh projects progressed? The last one
>appears to be in serious trouble now because Sun has to complain about
>every little detail and the star project makes either zero progress or
>no progress announcements.
On 2/5/07, James C. McPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Josh Hurst wrote:
> On 2/2/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> >And how far have the star or ksh projects progressed? The last one
>> >appears to be in serious trouble now beca
On 2/5/07, Doug Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/2/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > >And how far have the star or ksh projects
> progressed? The last one
> > >appears to be in serious trouble now because Sun
> has to complain about
> > >every little detail and the
On 2/5/07, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Josh Hurst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hmmm, how did JDS/gnome come up here??? Since it has, I assume
> > you don't like the look & feel of JDS, and would prefer Gnome. This
> > is a subj
On 2/16/07, Alan Coopersmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Girts Zeltins wrote:
> Sorry, but I am talking again about CDE.
> I want to know if founded CDE errors will be reported to bug database, will
they be fixed? Is there any chance to see them fixed?
If they are serious bugs, then they may be
On 2/23/07, Ghee Teo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Josh Hurst wrote:
> On 2/16/07, Alan Coopersmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Girts Zeltins wrote:
>> > Sorry, but I am talking again about CDE.
>> > I want to know if founded CDE errors will be reported to
On 6/14/07, Gaopeng Chen - Sun China <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Fingerprint Authentication
==
Project Overview:
-
The biometrics technology grows fast. Fingerprint authentication is
widely used in many situations. It's a valuable feature to support
finge
On 2/6/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >1) *NOT* POSIX compliant
> >7) Continues to cause issues for users and developers when dealing
> >with multiple systems
>
> 7, unfortunately, is not as it requires replacing /bin/sh with /bin/bash
> and that, I think, it something few wou
On 2/6/08, Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 6, 2008 12:30 PM, Kyle McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Shawn Walker wrote:
> > > On Feb 6, 2008 11:59 AM, Kyle McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> "Shawn Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2/6/08, Bruno Jargot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/6/08, Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Feb 6, 2008 11:23 AM, Joerg Schilling
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > "Shawn Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Feb 6, 2008 11:08 AM, Joerg Schilling
> > > > <[EMAIL
On 7/31/06, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Martin Schaffstall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Formal Proposal : Port OpenSolaris to PowerPC
>
> +1
>
> I suggest to make /bin/ksh ksh93 from the beginning that you don't
> have to deal with any backwards compatibility fuzz
On 7/31/06, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Martin Schaffstall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Formal Proposal : Port OpenSolaris to PowerPC
>
> +1
>
> I suggest to make /bin/ksh ksh93 from the beginning that you don't
> have to deal with any backwards compatibility fuzz
Just a notification: Debian and Ubuntu are going to removal **ALL**
CDDL licensed materials from their distribution, stating that the
license is non-free and "illegal" (not GPL compatible).
-- Forwarded message --
From: Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Aug 11, 2006 10:51 PM
On 8/17/06, Richard Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Josh Hurst wrote:
> Just a notification: Debian and Ubuntu are going to removal **ALL**
> CDDL licensed materials from their distribution, stating that the
> license is non-free and "illegal" (not GPL compatible).
>
On 8/30/06, Alan Coopersmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Josh Hurst wrote:
> I agree with you that the discussion should end here and how, however
> only if Sun (including Dan Price) is willing to honor what I call "the
> original deal" which includes the integration int
On 10/17/06, maoyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I want to post my 4over6 code.How?
4over6 is a project that makes ipv4 packets go through ipv6 network.
I suggest that you wait until the ksh93 integration project is done
with it's work. The project suffers from excessive bureaucracy
overhead and
On 10/18/06, James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Josh Hurst writes:
> On 10/17/06, maoyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I want to post my 4over6 code.How?
> >
> > 4over6 is a project that makes ipv4 packets go through ipv6 network.
> I suggest that
On 10/18/06, Josh Hurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/18/06, James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Josh Hurst writes:
> > On 10/17/06, maoyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I want to post my 4over6 code.How?
> > >
> > > 4over6
On 10/18/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 10/18/06, Josh Hurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 10/18/06, James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Josh Hurst writes:
>> > > On 10/17/06, maoyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Original message -
Received: by 10.35.129.1 with SMTP id g1mr6053080pyn.1163008714367;
Wed, 08 Nov 2006 09:58:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.35.45.19 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 09:58:34 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 18:58:34 +0100
From: "Josh H
On 11/8/06, Rich Teer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 8 Nov 2006, Josh Hurst wrote:
> Why have all lists at opensolaris.org a -discuss ending? Its confusing.
They're not, hence opensolaris-code et al. The -discuss lists are
intended for general discussion about the bit befo
On 11/28/06, Stephen Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Planet OpenSolaris is now an official part of the OpenSolaris family,
and can now be found in its new home at:
http://planet.opensolaris.org
Roland, could you add Planet OpenSolaris to your rss reader?
Josh
__
On 12/29/06, Dennis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What do we have for SPAM filters ? Just curious.
The whole list system appears to be damaged. The whole ksh93 list
archive is gone. Maybe a hack?
Josh
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
openso
How can I boot (Open)Solaris into the Trusted Solaris mode?
Josh
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 1/5/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Peter Tribble wrote:
>> On 1/1/07, wb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > I have a /tmp FS for swap, and a really big file crout*
>> > inside. The /tmp was 95% up.
>> > I decided to remove the crout file.
>> > The problem, is the /tmp is n
On 1/5/07, Frank Hofmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Martin Bochnig wrote:
I think Sun has to overcome both "not invented here" and the instinctive
reject via "not perfect, therefore not 'good enough' no matter what the
users say", before lsof goes into mainstream Solaris.
If
On 12/30/06, Boyd Adamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 30/12/2006, at 5:08 AM, Josh Hurst wrote:
> How can I boot (Open)Solaris into the Trusted Solaris mode?
>
> Josh
It's not as simple as "booting into Trusted Solaris mode". You need
to install and configure the
On 1/5/07, Rich Teer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Note that lsof doesn't have to do kmem craling. For example on Linux
> it only uses proper procfs interfaces. As such proper interfaces seem
> to exist on Solaris as well for use with pfiles it shoul
On 1/5/07, Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just because /bin/sh isn't your shell of choice doesn't make it crappy.
Really?
Take 1:
/bin/sh < /dev/urandom
Illegal Instruction (core dumped)
Take 2-29:
cat /var/adm/messages* | grep -F core.sh | sort
Dec 10 11:09:41 fido genunix: [ID 6
On 7/7/09, Henk Langeveld wrote:
> Roland Mainz wrote:
>
> > [1]=Actually... what is the current stock ticker symbol of AT&T right now
> ?
> >
>
> That'd be a bit confusing. Even though AT&T was acquired some years back,
> it was a kind of reverse takeover.
>
> Anyhow, AT&T's stock ticker is s
On 3/25/09, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>
> > On 3/25/09, Ignacio Marambio Catán wrote:
>
> >> This isnt very constructive either, it is also not true,
>
>
> < Noises deleted >
>
>
> > If Jörg continues this path I'd propose to throw Mr. Jörg out of
> > opensolaris.
>
>
> I agree that *someone* shoul
On 3/25/09, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Jennifer Pioch wrote:
>
>
> > On 3/25/09, Ignacio Marambio Catán wrote:
> > > And what happened after the review was aprobed exactly? were test
> > > packages provided? someone at sun checked them for compliance and code
> > > review? why? why not?
> >
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Nicholas George
wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> we wish to have the bug below handled ASAP and are looking for at
> least a year of full support for our existing Sun hardware running
> Opensolaris.
> Which support options does Oracle provide for Opensolaris?
> How can we
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 12:53 AM, Erik Trimble wrote:
> You'll have to talk to a Oracle Sales Rep directly to get information
> about Support options for OpenSolaris. This has been changing over the
> past month(s), so please talk to the SaleReps - the various
> @opensolaris.org lists can't give
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 5:17 AM, Alan DuBoff wrote:
> On Thu, 20 May 2010, Erik Trimble wrote:
>
>> Be *very* careful what you wish for. One of the problems with OpenSolaris
>> (from a PR standpoint) has been the lack of real emphasis on the GOAL for
>> OpenSolaris. Is it a general-purpose, use-
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 6:51 AM, Alan DuBoff wrote:
>> The comment about GNU is IMO unjustified. The ksh93-integration and
>> AT&T team have done a much better technical job than GNU in the last
>> four years. We got ksh93, a lot of modernized tools, even more in the
>> work, with GNU *and* BSD ex
42 matches
Mail list logo
