I still can't get the zoom to work. I may have to order two manuals.
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, you wrote:
> Do they still charge $4 for bipedal manual? :)
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 9:32 PM
> Subject
> >What do you usually use a 50mm for? It seems too long
> >for a nice landscape and too short for a portrait. I
> >would love to get the lens (been rated too well to
> >ignore it) but I really don't know how useful it can
> >be. It would be nice if other readers could contribute
> >what they woul
At 11:16 PM 3/12/2001 -0600, Ken Archer wrote:
>It's only paranoia when you just think they're out to get you. In your case,
>they real are out to get you.
>
>On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, you wrote:
> > Good paranoia is never truly wasted ...
> >
> > Tom Rittenhouse obsessed:
> >
> > > Darn! You mean I w
It's only paranoia when you just think they're out to get you. In your case,
they real are out to get you.
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, you wrote:
> Good paranoia is never truly wasted ...
>
> Tom Rittenhouse obsessed:
>
> > Darn! You mean I wasted all that paranoia?
> >
--
Kenneth Archer + San Anto
Cesar asks:
> PENTAX & SINGLE-LENS REFLEX PHOTOGRAPHY
> by Robert Fuhring
> Anyone else come across this book?
I have the fifth edition featuring the Spotmatic and have been
through it a couple of times. It's encouraging (for us manual
focus users) to read the older literature when these camer
Hi César,
As my travel continues in Utah, I stopped in a
>book store
Was this Sam Weller's? If you like books, this is the
place.
as I was
>walking around taking photos. Of course I had to
>peruse the photo section,
>talk about old books! I found an interesting small
>photo book wi
Do they still charge $4 for bipedal manual? :)
- Original Message -
From: "tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 9:32 PM
Subject: Re: When does a 35-135 zoom have a 10:1 range?
> Ken Archer wrote:
> >
> > I did and I'm still trying to figure ou
Except for the FA 28-70/4 AL, probably among the best of the 'standard' 28-70 out
there..Also, the F 28-80 is also a good lens as well. I've never used the F
28-80 but do have the 28-70/4 and for the money, you'll not find a better lens in its
class, IMHO.
John
- Original Messa
>> it shouldn't be too tough to fix if what Alan Chan says about the dirty
contact is true. <<
I sure hope that's the case. My self timer ceased functioning many years ago
on my Super Program of nearly 18 years vintage. I also had the film counter
fail to reset when the camera was new but got t
As my travel continues in Utah, I stopped in a book store as I was
walking around taking photos. Of course I had to peruse the photo section,
talk about old books! I found an interesting small photo book with a
Honeywell Pentax on the cover.
PENTAX & SINGLE-LENS REFLEX PHOTOGRAP
Yes - at http://www.mail-archive.com/pentax-discuss%40pdml.net/
Maris Lidaka
- Original Message -
From: "Robertson, Alastair" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 10:35 PM
Subject: old archive
| Hi
|
| is the old pentax disc
Good paranoia is never truly wasted ...
Tom Rittenhouse obsessed:
> Darn! You mean I wasted all that paranoia?
>
>
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http
I shot a whole roll of KodaColor 400 inside the USAF museum in Dayton,
OH in the early 80's. All of it was with my 50/1.4 and available
light. I was more than pleased with the results. I relied mostly with
the camera's meter. I don't remember if I used my K-1000 or MX. I
don't think I had an
Well I shot a picture with a film grained Fuji slide film with my Pentax
camera, tripod, and FA* glass, and got a nice Ilfochrome made from it, then
I a picture with my Barbiecam from a moving car and printed it out on my
dot matrix printer. The film picture is way better so obviously everything
Hi
is the old pentax discussion list archived somewhere - discuss.pentax.com
My search engine keeps teasing me with references to the old list that look
interesting!
Alastair Robertson
Dr Alastair W. Robertson, Senior Lecturer
Ecolog
Darn! You mean I wasted all that paranoia?
Doug Brewer wrote:
>
> Well, I'm not usually one to let a good conspiracy theory die on the vine, but in
>this case it was Ken's ISP. They had cached a bunch of messages, and then instead of
>forwarding, they reversed them back into the pdml server.
I bookmarked his page earlier. I would sure be interested in how things turn
out for you. Now I know why there is protection in large groups.
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, you wrote:
> Hello all;
> I was just wondering if anyone has heard anything good or
> bad about him. If not, perhaps I will play g
Over on rec.photo.? a gentle man has compared film v digital and
concluded that digital is better. He did this by scanning a 4x6
photo and printing it out as a 8x12 and printing an 8x12 taken
with his 3 megapixel camera. He says the digital picture was
definitely the better of the two.
???
--To
On Ebay they call them unused old stock. As far as I know there
is only one company in the world currently making flash bulbs.
There is/was supposed to be another one in China but I have
never found any information on them. Megaflash in Ireland does
not make FP rated bulbs as far as I know.
Now
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001 21:15:26 -0600, Dan Scott wrote:
>I would've, but I'd just made a great deal on a slightly used bridge in
>Brooklyn, and din't have any money left.
ROTFLMAO!! :-)
Way to go, Dan!
Later,
Gary
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001 20:31:13 -0600, Ken Archer wrote:
>I did and I'm still trying to figure out how to make it zoom ;-)
Use a reversing ring! :-)
Later,
Gary
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't fo
A ("normal") 50mm f1.4?? (Or f1.7, f1.8, f1.9, f2.0...)
I find a 50 ideal for those scenes that are "busy"; scenes that have a lot
in them (like city street scenes), where you might not want to use a WA lens
because the shot would then become cluttered.
IMO it's good for landscapes in that partic
>On Mon, 12 Mar 2001 20:12:27 -0600, Dan Scott wrote:
>
>>I saw a "50/1.7 Zoom Lens" yesterday. :-)
>
>Man, you should have grabbed that sucker! Talk about RARE! :-))
>
>
>
>
>Later,
>Gary
I would've, but I'd just made a great deal on a slightly used bridge in
Brooklyn, and din't have any money
Ken Archer wrote:
>
> I did and I'm still trying to figure out how to make it zoom ;-)
It employs the advanced and complicated bipedal zoom mechanism.
You may need to get a manual from Pentax.
tv
>
> On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, you wrote:
> > On Mon, 12 Mar 2001 20:12:27 -0600, Dan Scott wrote:
> >
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Larson" <> Steve Larson
> Redondo Beach, California
> Never under any circumstances take a sleeping pill and a
laxative
> on the same night.
Is that what I am doing wrong
Jeeze, now I feel dumb.
Wheatfield
-
This message is from the Pentax
I did and I'm still trying to figure out how to make it zoom ;-)
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, you wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Mar 2001 20:12:27 -0600, Dan Scott wrote:
>
> >I saw a "50/1.7 Zoom Lens" yesterday. :-)
>
> Man, you should have grabbed that sucker! Talk about RARE! :-))
>
>
>
>
> Later,
> Gary
Hi,
Thanks for that, it was pretty much as i thought. i was just confirming :)
Thanks
- Original Message -
From: "tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 1:05 PM
Subject: Re: Neutral Density Filter
> Paul Jones wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am wond
Hi all,
Has anyone ever seen or own a 1.4X or 1.5X teleconvertor in screw mount?
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
Never under any circumstances take a sleeping pill and a laxative
on the same night.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to htt
Sorry guys, you're going to be inundated
http://www.bigdayphoto.com/tom/balto_tower_10030001.html
FA 645 120/4 Macro, Pan F+, 25 filter
tv
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pen
Hello all;
I have been in contact with a guy named Klaus
Garcia who has offered to fix my Me Super for
what I consider to be a small sum. My Me Super
does not advance the film at first, and then,
after retrying about 50 times, it will advance it
every third time, then every other time, then
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001 20:12:27 -0600, Dan Scott wrote:
>I saw a "50/1.7 Zoom Lens" yesterday. :-)
Man, you should have grabbed that sucker! Talk about RARE! :-))
Later,
Gary
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the direct
Hi Gianfranco,
Congrats on the Spotmatic! I`m glad it cleaned up OK for you. I think
you will like it.
I can`t answer the question, yet. I picked up a Super Tak 50 1.4, but have
not
used it yet.
I did`nt know there were two versions of the 50mm 1.4 Super Tak. How do you
tell them apart? Peter Jo
>When it's described on EBay, of course:
>http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1221346392
>
>
>Paul Franklin Stregevsky
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>W: (703) 834-4648
Ha! That's nothing.
I saw a "50/1.7 Zoom Lens" yesterday. :-)
Dan Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the
Baron Wolman just recently started using a Pentax 928 P&S for some
of his everyday shooting. He LOVES the camera. To hear him talk,
he's more excited about it than his Nikon gear ... I kid you not.
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List
I find that a 50mm lens is frequently a good choice to frame a
full-figure portrait, a small group of people or a street scene. (My
current PUG submission is a street scene that was shot with a 50.) The
50 works well for photographing some indoor activities. I've used it on
a couple of occasions t
Todd Stanley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Nice find. If the meter works you really got a good deal. As for the lens
> I believe it's the same optically as the SMC Tak, K and M series F1.4 lens,
> except there is no SMC of course. It's an excellent performer. Enjoy!
>
> BTW, where did you pick up
Silver, yuck They need to start making the black models again.. Even
on the MZ/ZX series they look better
l8r,
Douglas E Harmon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://personal.mia.bellsouth.net/~genius91/
- Original Message -
From: Arne Lie (f) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Se
No they have several. I think they have in K mount a non-macro, a macro,
and a macro with KA contacts. The last two are the ones to get.
Todd
At 09:55 AM 3/12/01 +0800, you wrote:
>Yes, one of the lens is Sears 135mm but I don't know whether it has macro
>feature because I have not got it. Do
You can't beat the combo of the MZ/ZX with the 28-70 F4... Lite and
realatively fast, it is definately great for casual shots walking around
The lense gets a little crazy(distortion) at the wide end... Even more so
than the newer 28-80 consumer lens sold in the kits...
l8r,
Douglas E Harmon
[
Well, that's good to know. Have fun with it, and if you don't like it I'll
take it off your hands for $100 :)
Todd
At 09:11 PM 3/11/01 EST, you wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
><< http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1221287672
>
> $99?!?!? ARRGHHH >>
>
>Todd,
>
>I
Looks to me like the hose that goes between a bicycle pump and the tyre
valve.
Peter
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Johan Schoone
> Sent: 12 March 2001 15:00
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Accessory hose for sale!
>
>
> X -
Kelvin Ang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Skip,
>
> What do you usually use a 50mm for? It seems too long
> for a nice landscape and too short for a portrait. I
> would love to get the lens (been rated too well to
> ignore it) but I really don't know how useful it can
> be. It would be nice i
Auction ends when time runs out. Item goes to the highest bidder, whatever
the price.
Frits
>
>
> I 'spose since a reserve price not met constitutes a non-auction.
> How does it
> work on a non-reserve auction (like most of mine)?
>
> Steve S.
> http://people.mn.mediaone.net/sscott2
>
> Tiger Mo
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001 08:39:10 -0800, Mark Roberts wrote:
>He must be one of those guys from Texas :-)
Yup! It's legal here =all= the time! :-)
Later,
Gary
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget
Dan Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I love the solitude, the focus, the hunt, the subjects, the gear, and the
> photographs. I love tracking down the ID of my latest find and picking up
> anything I can on its history or the origin of the name. I love sitting
> over my photos, trying to figure
Hello Skip,
What do you usually use a 50mm for? It seems too long
for a nice landscape and too short for a portrait. I
would love to get the lens (been rated too well to
ignore it) but I really don't know how useful it can
be. It would be nice if other readers could contribute
what they would use
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kelvin Ang
> Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 6:23 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Re[2]: FA 50mm f/1.4
>
>
> Hi there,
>
> Thanks for the clarification. I believe I got what you
> mean. Does
Hi there,
Thanks for the clarification. I believe I got what you
mean. Does it then make good portraits wide opened? I
guess the 50mm focal length is too short for
comfortable distance between the photographer and the
subject.
Kelvin
--- Alin Flaider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>By local
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tiger Moses
> Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 4:48 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Ebay - Buy it Now!
>
>
> When did they modifiy the feature, over the weekend.
> First bid used to kill the optio
Hi,
actually, I'm completely wrong about this, and I apologise for
spreading my shameful ignorance around the world like a farmyard
disease :o(
It is, in fact, slide film.
---
Bob
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Monday, March 12, 2001, 9:55:31 PM, you wrote:
> Hi,
> rev
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Johnston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: March 12, 2001 11:20 AM
Subject: Re: See ya!
> Bill,
> Thanks.
> Listen, I've already unsubscribed, but I had one last message
in my out box
> that I forgot to post. I guess I can
Except for the new commemorative edition that came out last year.
Raimo Korhonen wrote:
> Apparently the last Nikon rangefinders were the special batch of 2000 units of S3 in
>black made for the Tokyo Olympics in 1964. Otherwise the Nikon RF production seems to
>have ended in 1961.
--
Shel Be
WRONG!
-Original Message-
From: Bob Walkden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 3:56 PM
To: Ramesh Kumar_C
Subject: Re: color reversal film?
Hi,
reversal film is negative film, ie it is reversed.
Another name for slide film is transparency film.
Bob
Monday, M
You might want to consider the old FA Power Zoom 28-105/f4-5.6. It's
heavy (with relatively useless power zoom that you can turn off), but is
also a sharp lens in its class and quite highly regarded. It was
designed for the 1p. This is the standard lens on my 1p. I don't know if
it's still being p
I 'spose since a reserve price not met constitutes a non-auction. How does it
work on a non-reserve auction (like most of mine)?
Steve S.
http://people.mn.mediaone.net/sscott2
Tiger Moses wrote:
> When did they modifiy the feature, over the weekend.
> First bid used to kill the option, you hav
On 12 Mar 2001, at 17:25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> My thanks to Gabor, Jens, and Evan for clarifying the mount arrangement in
> CZJ lenses. Because of my aversion to dimmed viewfinders, I no longer
> regret that I recently missed picking up a "K-mount" CZJ 20/2.8 for $200 by a
> few hours.
Hi
Will it be delivered? That is the question.
Otis Wright
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David,
K1000 for $10...no I don't think you can lose on this one! Even
if the lens
doesn't work!
Regards, Bob S.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1221445625
On 13 Mar 2001, at 0:15, dave o'brien wrote:
> If you look at the press release, they make a big play over the fact
> that you can use 6x7 and 645 lenses on it. Not news to serious
> pentaxians, but the kind of thing which might grab the attention of
> someone used to a different system.
Hi Dav
Shot wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Today one of my friends offered to sell me a flash - it's Achiever
> 630AF (with added below "for Pentax Z10"). His friend is selling one
> and he was asking if I'm interested. This flash has a GN of 30 and AF
> beam.
>
> Does anybody have any info about this flash?
>
> I
Hi everybody,
This afternoon, while heading home, I've been attracted by a "bargain"
Spotmatic SP offered at a very nice price. The camera had some corrosion on
the top and around the mount. It worked fine, though (I couldn't test the
meter - dead battery) and had its original case (in very good
My thanks to Gabor, Jens, and Evan for clarifying the mount arrangement in
CZJ lenses. Because of my aversion to dimmed viewfinders, I no longer
regret that I recently missed picking up a "K-mount" CZJ 20/2.8 for $200 by
a few hours.
But Gabor also wrote:
Some old teles (2.8/120, 2.8/180) are a
On Sat, 10 Mar 2001, aimcompute wrote:
> " El Rastro, December 2000 " by Juan Buhler
> I love the expressions captured on the faces. This is not my type of
> photography, but this shot strikes me as very well executed and outstanding.
Thanks very much.
Also, thanks to the other people who com
Hi,
reversal film is negative film, ie it is reversed.
Another name for slide film is transparency film.
Bob
Monday, March 12, 2001, 9:08:52 PM, you wrote:
> Hi
> In the following link there is reference to "color reversal film".
> https://www.thecamerazone.com/productdetails
When did they modifiy the feature, over the weekend.
First bid used to kill the option, you have buy it now upto when the reserve
has been met now apparently!
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
Yes!
Jens
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]På; vegne af Ramesh Kumar_C
Sendt: 12. marts 2001 22:09
Til: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Emne: color reversal film?
Hi
In the following link there is reference to "color reversal film".
https://w
In a word...yes
Jerry in Houston
-Original Message-
From: Ramesh Kumar_C [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 3:09 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: color reversal film?
Hi
In the following link there is reference to "color reversal film".
https://
Apparently the last Nikon rangefinders were the special batch of 2000 units of S3 in
black made for the Tokyo Olympics in 1964. Otherwise the Nikon RF production seems to
have ended in 1961.
All the best!
Raimo
Personal photography homepage at http://personal.inet.fi/private/raimo.korhonen
>Unfortunately the focus direction is wrong way in Pentax and Nikon
>mount. Ralf
I would say the Tamron's got the "right" way focus direction. All my old
lenses (the lenses which made SLR concept - Exakta lenses. Granddads of all
SLR lenses ) turn the way as Tamron (and opposite the way of F 1.4
*** My reply to Ralf:
Unfortunately, Tamron's SP series is not so good now as it used to be. I
wouldn't rate it "FA* so to say". Normal Tamron zooms are cheapish consumer
zooms, while the SP series has the pro lenses, but similar to other
third-party's pro lenses. I think the * Pentax lenses are a
I have had one for about 3 years, using it on my PZ-70 and PZ-20. It has
functioned perfectly and I have no complaints. The tilting and rotating
head is really nice for bounce flash. I bought mine, NIB, on ebay for about
$85 and I consider it a good buy. I would expect it to be in excellent
co
Nick wrote:
>I am looking for a zoom to replace my old 35-80 and I am casting my eyes
>over the new Tamron 24-135 SP. Has anyone seen any reviews of this lens? I
>am going to use it on my PZ1p. I suspect it will be quite a bit cheaper than
>the Pentax 24-90 and has a more range but I have no idea
Brent wrote:
>The exact same situation occurs if the ISO is 100 and the shutter
>is set to "B". It does not however occur at a "B" when the ISO is
>50...but it does if the dial is set to the blank space between "B"and
>1/1000 sec.
Hi Brent,
The combination of ASA 100 film speed setting and B
i wondered if someone would say something about that wording. i am sure
everyone knew what i was talking about.
"Gary L. Murphy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Sun, 11 Mar 2001 17:47:35 -0500 (EST), Harry Baughman wrote:
>
>> i like to shoot people.
>
>I thought that was illegal in most plac
Hi
In the following link there is reference to "color reversal film".
https://www.thecamerazone.com/productdetails2.cfm?Product_ID=RAP120
Could anybody tell what is "color reversal film"?
Is "reversal film" another name to "Slide film"?
Thanks
Ramesh
-
This mess
"Juan J. Buhler" wrote:
> MWAH HA HA...
>
> All your LX are belong to us!
*snicker* http://www.geocities.com/driseog/ayb.html
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Use
Hello.
Today one of my friends offered to sell me a flash - it's Achiever
630AF (with added below "for Pentax Z10"). His friend is selling one
and he was asking if I'm interested. This flash has a GN of 30 and AF
beam.
Does anybody have any info about this flash?
Is $50 about right price for
Many years ago I purchased a Tamron (I believe) 500 mirror for my M series bodies and
K-1000. There was noticable loss of sharpess but contrast really took the big hit.
It eventually was stolen from my car while
on a trip (along with a Vivitar 283 flash and SMC-M 135/3.5 lens). I replaced the
Hello
I hold last thursday a sample of the MZ-S!!!
It is very special event but its price gives a bad taste of it
See you
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
-
This message is from
Nick Snowdon wrote:
I am looking for a zoom to replace my old 35-80 and I
am casting my eyes over the new Tamron 24-135 SP. Has
anyone seen any reviews of this lens? I am going to
use it on my PZ1p. I suspect it will be quite a bit
cheaper than the Pentax 24-90 and has a more range but
I have no
Some goodies I picked up today that'll go cheap here.
I'll pay US shipping on these items.
Collin
#1. Case $25
Metal construction and good foam inside.
http://www.integrityonline21.com/dpconsult/ebay/case.jpg
http://www.integrityonline21.com/dpconsult/ebay/caseb.jpg
#2 50mm Filte
>Dan,
>
>I heard that if you pee on it, it will straighten right out. Wouldn't hurt
>to try. It supposed to cure athlete's foot and keep the pests of off roses.
>:-)
>
>Tom C.
Thanks Tom. I'll let the volunteer PUG critics handle that.
(FWIW, it's extremely efficacious on cats.)
Dan Scott
[E
People ... I love working with all sorts of people in many types of
environments. Kids are great, especially when I can capture the
relationship between kids and their parents. I love catching a hug
or a kiss, a touch or a glance, or some other indication of
closeness and the love and bond betwee
The 2.8/180 mm is the original & legendary Olympia Sonnar of 1936 designed for the
Contax II rangefinder.
All the best!
Raimo
Personal photography homepage at http://personal.inet.fi/private/raimo.korhonen
-Alkuperäinen viesti-
Lähettäjä: Sas Gabor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Vastaanottaja: [EMA
Yeh, I realize I'm probably wrong now (Head hung ashamed) and that Tom R.
was being funny. Where I came from an A was anything between 90 - 100. If
the teacher was particularly impressed by some ungradeable aspect of the
paper you got an A+. It's likely the original poster was not rating thing
Dan wrote:
> >
> > I dropped a roll of print film off at a new lab for processing and
> > sleeving, and, instead of sleeving, they rolled the film and put it into
> > the canister the film cartridge was in. I've cut it into 5 frame strips,
> > but I'm having a heck of a time trying to uncurl the
Hi Boz,
I confirmed it with Pentax Lenses catalogue as of June 2000.
It says "Two aspherical lenses, glass mold and hybrid, are
adopted. Various technologies such as floating zoom and
GHOSTLESS COATING enable this lens to perform very well at
all focal length and perspective."
Sincerely,
**
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001 17:59:37 +1300, David A. Mann wrote:
>> The digital SLR (MZ-D ?) will heve a 24x36 mm sensor, equal in size to
>> the 35mm system FILM camera's.
>
> I am fully aware of that. I was aiming my post at the "other" brands who use
>those puny little APS-size sensors (are we allow
Yes. Although the DOF, [the part of the picture available just in front of,
or just behind, the focused upon subject] is greatly limited as far as what
one can include in a close-up f1.4 shot.
But this is true with every fast, wide open lens...
And at least the FA 50/1.4 focuses sharp as a tack [a
A scroll of mail from Tom Rittenhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on
Sun, 11 Mar 2001 15:57:55 -0500
Read it? y
>I don't know how well it will sell, but what list members are
>missing is this camera won't be competing with 3 mega-pixel
>amateur cameras but with cameras that are now selling for about
>$25,
A scroll of mail from Pål Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 12
Mar 2001 12:25:08 +0100
Read it? y
>I wrote:
>
>> A company that doesn't reply to e-mails is certainly suspect.
>
>
>Well, they finally replied today after three weeks. So they don't seem that suspect
>after all.
An online comp
Hi,
Thanks for your reply. You mention that it displays a
softening effect around the _local edges_. Can you
explain what you mean by local edges? And, how does
local contrast differ from overall contrast? I'm quite
new to photography but I'm eager to learn more.
Thanks again,
Kelvin
--- Alin F
Hi,
Recently Alin Flaider wrote:
>
>It was mentioned on the FA 35/2 press release and possibly for the
> FA 20-45/4 too. For sure ghostless coatings is associated with the new
> 24-90/3.5-4.5.
It was also mentioned in the press release of the 28-105/3,2-4,5. Can
anyone confirm for the 20-3
>> Those Kodak instant print cameras are really valuable. Remember
them?
>> After Polaroid won their patent case, those Kodak gems really became
>> collectable. I've seen a few at thrift stores. No one wants them
-yet!
>> Jim A.
Really? I was just looking at my wife's old Kodak. She lost out
X - A scroll of news from
Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Read it? [yn] y
>http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1220636208
>
>Damned if *I* know what it is... ;)
It is a bit short to connect a pneumatic tool to an air compressor.
ObPhoto: Check out
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-
I own both and like both. When I bought a camera for my daughter I gave her
the 28-70 because my instincts (and photos) indicated that I had more
confidence in the 28-105. However, the28-105 is heavier, larger and I
have recently bought another 28-70. I like the 28-70 on my ZX5n w/o battery
I bought mine about a year ago for $565. It is the most exciting thing I
have done in 35mm photography. Imagine a 300mm lens that gives results like
shooting with a 50mm lens. I almost wept on seeing the first pictures I
took. I couldn't believe the sharpness. I will always have a Pentax camera
>"Gary L. Murphy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >On Sun, 11 Mar 2001 17:47:35 -0500 (EST), Harry Baughman wrote:
> >
> >> i like to shoot people.
> >
> >I thought that was illegal in most places... :-)))
>
>He must be one of those guys from Texas :-)
>-
It's only legal in Texas MOST of the time.
Hi Boz ..
It reads: SMC PENTAX-A* 1:2.8 200mm ED
Bojidar Dimitrov wrote:
> I need to know the exact name that appears on the barrel of the A* 200/2.8
> ED lens.
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
There are no rules for good photographs,
there are only good photographs.
-
This message
Hope nobody minds the post. Just thought that some may find this helpful
since it seems there are a few people on the list who are using inkjet
printers to make prints.
==
50 sheets of high-gloss inkjet photo paper for $12
--
Looks like coax cable to me.
Doug
Quoting Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?
ViewItem&item20636208
>
> Damned if *I* know what it is... ;)
Ashwood Lake Photography
http://www.alphoto.com
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To uns
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
