Alan C
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
-Original Message-
From: Alan C
Sent: 20 May, 2018 11:57 AM
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Test
Brian
I'm having e-mail problems.
I can send using Windows Live Mail which I've always used but the e-mails
just vanish.
The one you replied to was send directly from Vox Telecoms
test, a test, oh man i forgot to study.
Dave
On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 8:00 AM, Daniel J. Matyola <danmaty...@gmail.com> wrote:
> transmission received.
>
> 10-4 good buddy.
>
>
> Dan Matyola
> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
>
> On Sun, May 20,
transmission received.
10-4 good buddy.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 1:00 AM, wrote:
>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
OK
Cheers
Brian
> On 20 May 2018 at 15:00 c...@lantic.net wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
> the directions.
--
PDML
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
I behaved. I was this close [] to making that reference. :D
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 2:17 PM, John wrote:
> On 3/1/2018 08:19, David J Brooks wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 8:28 PM, John Sessoms
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Setting up the email client on
On 3/1/2018 08:19, David J Brooks wrote:
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 8:28 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
Setting up the email client on my new laptop and want to see if I can
communicate with the PDML list.
Can you see me now?
No but i can see my house though
But can you
Funny, I can see Dave's house too...
On 3/1/2018 8:19 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 8:28 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
Setting up the email client on my new laptop and want to see if I can
communicate with the PDML list.
Can you see me now?
No but i
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 8:28 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
> Setting up the email client on my new laptop and want to see if I can
> communicate with the PDML list.
>
> Can you see me now?
No but i can see my house though
Dave
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>
You shouldn't need to keep them. The unpacking process before
installing may leave behind a number of intermediate temporary files you
don't need either.
On 2/28/2018 8:37 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
After I install the web browser & email client, do I need to keep the
installer EXE files that
As Igor said, you don't need to keep them but I usually do in case I need to go
back to that version if a future update doesn't work. eg. about a year ago I
updated Firefox and found it wouldn't load on my PC so I reinstalled the earlier
version from the saved installer.
Cheers
Brian
> On
No. You don't need to keep them.
But I typically do keep all the installer files.
It was only ones or twice in the 21st century that I went back to them on
the same computer. (I've went to them for a different computer, - but not
for such frequently updated software as web browser and
After I install the web browser & email client, do I need to keep the
installer EXE files that I downloaded?
Specifically: palemoon-27.7.2.win64.installer dotexe
Thunderbird Setup 52.6.0 dotexe
Do I need to keep them?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On February 28, 2018 5:28:38 PM PST, John Sessoms
wrote:
>Setting up the email client on my new laptop and want to see if I can
>communicate with the PDML list.
>
>Can you see me now?
Yup, you're as handsome as Bill
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail.
Setting up the email client on my new laptop and want to see if I can
communicate with the PDML list.
Can you see me now?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
Past!
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 13, 2018, at 11:21 AM, Rick Womer <rickpic...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 11:13 P. J. Alling <webstertwenty...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> test
>>
>> --
>> America wasn't founded so that w
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 11:13 P. J. Alling <webstertwenty...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> test
>
> --
> America wasn't founded so that we could all be better.
> America was founded so we could all be anything we damn well please.
> - P.J. O'Rourke
>
>
> --
>
test
--
America wasn't founded so that we could all be better.
America was founded so we could all be anything we damn well please.
- P.J. O'Rourke
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit
A+
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Carry on!
Sent from my iPad
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Unfortunately you are correct. Sorry, this was less of an even test than I had
wanted!
I just went back to the original files and did a careful look. I was using
Liveview as my focus aid for all three lenses. My intent was to focus on the
old fallen tree behind the collected river debris
Interesting,
How did you focus the The 150mm? The intruding branches above the water
seems very sharp indeed.
Jostein
Den 07.12.2017 20:04, skrev Stanley Halpin:
So my father-in-law did a lot of photography and had a lot of gear. Many years
ago I was visiting, I was doing some shots with my
So my father-in-law did a lot of photography and had a lot of gear. Many years
ago I was visiting, I was doing some shots with my Pentax 645. He pulled out
his Hasselblad and played with it a bit (but no shots.) I commented that I knew
of an adapter would let me use his lenses on my camera. No
Indeed!
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 4:02 AM, Jostein wrote:
>
>
> Den 24.11.2017 23:38, skrev Daniel J. Matyola:
>
>> Wow, that is a hell of a rig!
>>
>
> Well... you know how projects tend to accumulate mass over
Den 24.11.2017 23:38, skrev Daniel J. Matyola:
Wow, that is a hell of a rig!
Well... you know how projects tend to accumulate mass over time... :-)
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
Wow, that is a hell of a rig!
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Jostein wrote:
>
>
> Den 23.11.2017 23:14, skrev John:
>
>> It's pretty cool, but I'd also be interested in seeing what the equipment
>> setup looks
Den 24.11.2017 20:26, skrev Larry Colen:
If you weren't capable of such amazing work, we wouldn't hold you to
such high standards.
In humble gratitude, that's bollocks. :-)
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
Jostein wrote:
Den 23.11.2017 23:14, skrev John:
It's pretty cool, but I'd also be interested in seeing what the
equipment setup looks like.
Last time I posted pics of the setup looks like, it was all about the
results. You guys are hard to please. :-)
If you weren't capable of such
Den 23.11.2017 23:23, skrev mike wilson:
There's a full version (38 MB) on my website if anyone wish to peep some
pixels, I'll leave it there for a week or so.
http://www.alunfoto.no/temp/20171123-0001-0101%20ZS%20PMax-full.jpg
The full size one is pretty impressive. How many layers?
Den 23.11.2017 23:14, skrev John:
It's pretty cool, but I'd also be interested in seeing what the
equipment setup looks like.
Last time I posted pics of the setup looks like, it was all about the
results. You guys are hard to please. :-)
http://www.alunfoto.no/temp/20171124-0001-pdml.jpg
> On 23 November 2017 at 20:17 Jostein <p...@alunfoto.no> wrote:
>
>
> William Robb recently helped me aquire a bellows for the 645 system.
> Today I did a test run with stacking, and am a very happy camper.
>
> The bellows is a very nicely constructed piece of ki
It's pretty cool, but I'd also be interested in seeing what the equipment setup
looks like.
On 11/23/2017 15:17, Jostein wrote:
William Robb recently helped me aquire a bellows for the 645 system. Today I
did a test run with stacking, and am a very happy camper.
The bellows is a very nicely
Looks like a alien speeding through space!
fun :-)
ann
On 11/23/2017 3:17 PM, Jostein wrote:
William Robb recently helped me aquire a bellows for the 645 system.
Today I did a test run with stacking, and am a very happy camper.
The bellows is a very nicely constructed piece of kit. Very
William Robb recently helped me aquire a bellows for the 645 system.
Today I did a test run with stacking, and am a very happy camper.
The bellows is a very nicely constructed piece of kit. Very stable, and
over all well machined. Pentax really knows how to make good bellows.
My test run
Test #3 - "Reply All" goes
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
... same as "Reply" did.
Again, this works with ver. 45.8.0
On 7/3/2017 12:47, John Francis wrote:
On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 08:55:53AM +0200, Alan C wrote:
Correct me if I am wrong. If an email is sent to a li
Second Test - ver 45.8.0 "Reply goes
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On 7/3/2017 12:47, John Francis wrote:
On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 08:55:53AM +0200, Alan C wrote:
Correct me if I am wrong. If an email is sent to a list (such as the PDML),
& you use "Reply List" or "Re
First Test - I'm still on 45.8.0 so this may not hold for 52.2.1
Reply List goes To: pdml-at-pdml.net
On 7/3/2017 12:47, John Francis wrote:
On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 08:55:53AM +0200, Alan C wrote:
Correct me if I am wrong. If an email is sent to a list (such as the PDML),
& you use &q
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 7:04 PM, John wrote:
> On 5/22/2017 14:04, Bruce Walker wrote:
>>
>> Wow is my reaction to this article. Author carefully tests the light
>> quality from 28 available LED products and also thoroughly explains
>> his measuring criteria, methods, and
On 5/22/2017 14:04, Bruce Walker wrote:
Wow is my reaction to this article. Author carefully tests the light
quality from 28 available LED products and also thoroughly explains
his measuring criteria, methods, and baseline sources, like the sun.
Especially interesting is how he shows that CRI
On 22/5/17, Larry, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Sorry, I was busy reading the article.
That's my boy
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Production
--
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On May 22, 2017 11:10:45 AM PDT, Mark Roberts
wrote:
>Bruce Walker wrote:
>
>>For all the engineering and technically minded, possibly anally
>>retentive, nit-picky, attention-to-details oriented list members, this
>>is the article of the month for you ...
>
>Larry?
Bruce Walker wrote:
>For all the engineering and technically minded, possibly anally
>retentive, nit-picky, attention-to-details oriented list members, this
>is the article of the month for you ...
Larry? Larry? You out there?
>http://nofilmschool.com/2017/04/2017-led-light-shootout
;-)
--
Wow is my reaction to this article. Author carefully tests the light
quality from 28 available LED products and also thoroughly explains
his measuring criteria, methods, and baseline sources, like the sun.
Especially interesting is how he shows that CRI is actually very
misleading when comparing
> On May 3, 2017, at 3:00 PM, Paul Sorenson wrote:
>
> Made it to MKE
Thanks, and it came back on both of my accounts.
I wonder if my last two weeks of email will suddenly show up.
>
> -p
>
> On May 3, 2017, 4:58 PM -0500, Larry Colen , wrote:
>>
Made it to MKE
-p
On May 3, 2017, 4:58 PM -0500, Larry Colen , wrote:
> I’m seeing mail coming in here, Let’s see if it also goes out.
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
I’m seeing mail coming in here, Let’s see if it also goes out.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
On 03/04/17 01:00, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
Test. This is simply a test.
And if you actually reading this, boy, are you bored.
It actually ended up in my "Spam" folder (blame Google), and I still read
it. I wonder what that says about by boredness (is that a word??)
- T
Marni
If it were a real emergency, we should get out our cameras and check the
settings…
stan
> On Apr 2, 2017, at 7:00 PM, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
>
> Test. This is simply a test.
>
>
>
> And if you actually reading this, boy, are you bored.
>
> Marnie (aka Doe)
Test. This is simply a test.
And if you actually reading this, boy, are you bored.
Marnie (aka Doe)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
Test. This is simply a test.
And if you actually reading this, boy, are you bored.
Marnie (aka Doe)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Apparently
Cheers
Brian
+
Brian Walters
Webmaster
Australian Native Plants Society (Australia)
http://anpsa.org.au
https://www.facebook.com/anpsa
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017, at 04:42 AM, John wrote:
> Just had a reply returned as 550-"JunkMail
Drat! Guess I'll have to try again.
On 2/22/2017 1:58 PM, Zos Xavius wrote:
Can't see it. ;)
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 12:42 PM, John wrote:
Just had a reply returned as 550-"JunkMail rejected apparently by
http://spameatingmonkey.com/lookup/209.86.89.63
The IP address
Can't see it. ;)
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 12:42 PM, John wrote:
> Just had a reply returned as 550-"JunkMail rejected apparently by
> http://spameatingmonkey.com/lookup/209.86.89.63
>
> The IP address appears to be one of Earthlink's mail servers.
>
> Thread was: What can
Just had a reply returned as 550-"JunkMail rejected apparently by
http://spameatingmonkey.com/lookup/209.86.89.63
The IP address appears to be one of Earthlink's mail servers.
Thread was: What can Pentax do to convince Sigma to make K mount lenses.
--
Science - Questions we may never find
Where did you go? Someplace warm I hope…
stan
> On Jan 6, 2017, at 6:23 PM, ann sanfedele wrote:
>
>
> sigh...
>
> ann
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit
You're here...=-O
-p
On 1/6/2017 5:23 PM, ann sanfedele wrote:
sigh...
ann
--
Being old doesn't seem so old now that I'm old.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
but with
increased detail. This contrasts with the Olympus implementation which
produces images about 4 times (in area) that of the 'normal' file. I
just bought an E-M5 MkII but I'm yet to test its pixel shift capability.
I'm not sure it's something I'd use often anyway.
I'm not sure about the Olympus
for K mount, I shot
some of the images with pixel shift turned ON.
Following a recent discussion on a Facebook pentax group, I did a bit
more and a comparison.
1. Pixel shift does seem to make a difference in resolution. My test
was not the best. 2. Pixel shift -> files about 3.5 times the s
sigh...
ann
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Larry Colen wrote:
Or you could pretend that it's the 21st century and just download the
software from here:
http://www.ricoh-imaging.co.jp/english/support/download_digital.html
Oops my bad, those seem to be only for the Q
Mac:
some of the images with pixel shift turned ON.
Following a recent discussion on a Facebook pentax group, I did a bit
more and a comparison.
1. Pixel shift does seem to make a difference in resolution. My test
was not the best.
2. Pixel shift -> files about 3.5 times the size of a “normal” K-1
implementation which
produces images about 4 times (in area) that of the 'normal' file. I
just bought an E-M5 MkII but I'm yet to test its pixel shift capability.
I'm not sure it's something I'd use often anyway.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney
Ya' past, Ann! Congrats!
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 6, 2017, at 8:23 AM, ann sanfedele <ann...@nyc.rr.com> wrote:
>
> test
>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRI
On 1/6/2017 11:23 AM, ann sanfedele wrote:
test
echo
--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
test
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
with pixel shift turned ON.
Following a recent discussion on a Facebook pentax group, I did a bit more and
a comparison.
1. Pixel shift does seem to make a difference in resolution. My test was not
the best.
2. Pixel shift -> files about 3.5 times the size of a “normal” K-1 DNG.
3. Lightroom d
Those tests are based upon a 35mm 6mp sensor monochrome astro sensor.
I think they are suspect. How can we know focus was perfect with each
one with no live view? I think the 67 lenses should do a little better
here. They might not be enough for a 36mp sensor, but they should be
resolving more
www.narrowbandimaging.com/images/pentax_67_lens_tests.pdf
Just in case you want to put one on your K1.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Well, there you go screwing up my beautiful theory, with pesky facts.
On 10/23/2016 10:18 AM, Alex Sarbu wrote:
I've done some pseudo-investigation (actually, just opened a 1:1 RAW
in Silkypix and Pentax DCU).
They're saving the entire 3:2 frame, but with a tag for 1:1 cropping;
so you can
Probably has more value for those shooting jpegs and not wanting to do any
perfecting after capture.
-Original Message-
>From: Larry Colen <l...@red4est.com>
>Subject: k-1 square crop test
>
>When I was photographing a seminar at the dojo today, I tried
>photogr
I came to following observations:
1. With FF lens and K1 in 1:1 cropmode makes little sense as indicated
by others.
2. With APS-C lens and K1 in 1:1 cropmode, there can be the advantage
of using the whole image circle.
3. However, many lenses do not offer the whole image circle to the
I've done some pseudo-investigation (actually, just opened a 1:1 RAW
in Silkypix and Pentax DCU).
They're saving the entire 3:2 frame, but with a tag for 1:1 cropping;
so you can recover the "extra" data - assuming your preferred image
processing software's crop tool supports this operation.
I'm sorry, I may have slandered the wrong group of idiots, the thread
that gave me a headache was on dpReview, the Pentax Fora thread was
slightly less, err, horrible...
On 10/23/2016 8:06 AM, P.J. Alling wrote:
I know nothing about the 1:1 crop mode, so I decided to do a little
research...
I know nothing about the 1:1 crop mode, so I decided to do a little
research...
After reading the first few posts on a Pentax Fora thread, I wanted to
yell at my computer screen: "IT'S CALLED AN IMAGE CIRCLE!"; idiots.
Like reading arguments by theologians about how many angels can dance on
When I was photographing a seminar at the dojo today, I tried
photographing in square crop mode.
On the bright side, it worked great for the photos that I was taking.
two people practicing Aikido can nearly fill a square composition, where
they leave a lot of the 3:2 frame empty.
On the down
Larry Colen wrote:
> Test link 2: http://flic.kr/p/MEp6SQ
You're still keeping the critics at bay.
Another nice shot.
Thank you Larry. Just pleased at the moment that links work as they should.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listi
Malcolm Smith wrote:
Larry Colen wrote:
That's a real chestnut!
Very much so.
Test link 2: http://flic.kr/p/MEp6SQ
You're still keeping the critics at bay.
Another nice shot.
Trying to shorten links as the long ones have a habit of breaking up when
sent. Hopefully this also works
Good to hear Malcolm.
-Original Message-
>From: Malcolm Smith <rrve...@virginmedia.com>
>Subject: RE: Test
>
>Ken Waller wrote:
>
>Essay, Q and A or multiple choice ?
>
>
>At long last sorted, but I've had no outgoing e-mail since the end of
>August!
&
Stanley Halpin wrote:
Works fine from this end.
Thanks!
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Works fine from this end.
stan
> On Oct 3, 2016, at 7:22 AM, Malcolm Smith <rrve...@virginmedia.com> wrote:
>
> Larry Colen wrote:
>
> That's a real chestnut!
>
> Very much so.
>
> Test link 2: http://flic.kr/p/MEp6SQ
>
> Trying to shorten links as th
Larry Colen wrote:
That's a real chestnut!
Very much so.
Test link 2: http://flic.kr/p/MEp6SQ
Trying to shorten links as the long ones have a habit of breaking up when
sent. Hopefully this also works, if so, last of the tests and normal PDML
viewing returns.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
t things going, I've opened a Flickr account
>to
>post things day to day.
>
>
>
>First image as a test:
>
>
>
>https://www.flickr.com/photos/143966226@N06/29970588752/in/dateposted-public
>/
That's a real chestnut!
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Pleas
Whilst in the electronic wilderness of no e-mail, I have been working slowly
on a website. Following advice here, I opted for Smugmug account.
In the meantime whilst I get things going, I've opened a Flickr account to
post things day to day.
First image as a test:
https
Ken Waller wrote:
Essay, Q and A or multiple choice ?
At long last sorted, but I've had no outgoing e-mail since the end of
August!
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
Essay, Q and A or multiple choice ?
-Original Message-
>From: Malcolm Smith <rrve...@virginmedia.com>
>Sent: Oct 2, 2016 2:07 PM
>To: PDML@pdml.net
>Subject: Test
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
t
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
You pass.
Finally!
Thanks Dan.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
You pass.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Malcolm Smith
wrote:
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
I tested crop mode as follows:
K-1 with Sigma APS-C lens 8-16mm @ 16 mm
(@ 16mm the Sigma covers FF)
3 pictures of bookshelves filled with books:
FF gives 44.5 MB
APS-C mode gives 22.2 MB
1:1 mode gives 45 MB
So Mark Roberts suggestion is right: the camera adds just a cropping
specification
gt;<bori...@gmail.com>:
>>>The sad part about these tests is that they don't help me to improve
>>>on my bloody Russian accent... Thick and heavy as it is... Jostein
>>>wins hands down here... :-)
>>>
>>>On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 8:09 PM, mike wilson
><m.9.w
y bloody Russian accent... Thick and heavy as it is... Jostein
>>> wins hands down here... :-)
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 8:09 PM, mike wilson <m.9.wil...@ntlworld.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> I managed 40,100 on the academic test. I deny all knowledge of
>>>
ese tests is that they don't help me to improve
>> on my bloody Russian accent... Thick and heavy as it is... Jostein
>> wins hands down here... :-)
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 8:09 PM, mike wilson <m.9.wil...@ntlworld.com>
>> wrote:
>>> I managed 40,100 on
ese tests is that they don't help me to improve
>>on my bloody Russian accent... Thick and heavy as it is... Jostein
>>wins hands down here... :-)
>>
>>On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 8:09 PM, mike wilson <m.9.wil...@ntlworld.com>
>>wrote:
>>> I managed 40,100 on the a
gt;>On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 8:09 PM, mike wilson <m.9.wil...@ntlworld.com>
>>wrote:
>>> I managed 40,100 on the academic test. I deny all knowledge of
>>diddling Mrs
>>> Slocombe's pussy. I am also impressed (but not surprised) by Boris
>>and
That's absolutely natural in such a huge metropolitan city...
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 1:34 AM, Bill wrote:
> On 7/13/2016 12:14 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
>>
>> The sad part about these tests is that they don't help me to improve
>> on my bloody Russian accent...
Says my total vocabulary is about 37,000 words.
John in Brisbane
-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Bob W-PDML
Sent: Wednesday, 13 July 2016 9:14 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: OT English test
Those are very impressive numbers
On 7/13/2016 12:14 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
The sad part about these tests is that they don't help me to improve
on my bloody Russian accent... Thick and heavy as it is... Jostein
wins hands down here... :-)
If it hadn't been for the Russian accent and the Pentax, I wouldn't have
recognized
mike wilson wrote:
It's actually an American test but we can forgive a few spelling mistakes...
I'm not sure that some of the options are the best syn/antonyms to offer and
I've no idea what the scoring system is but it's reasonable fun.
http://www.arealme.com/vocabulary-size-test/en/
I'm
30,500. The website chastised me; it instructed me to slow down.
Yonnie
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Steve Cottrell wrote:
> 29100
>
> harumph
>
> --
>
>
> Cheers,
> Cotty
>
>
> ___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
> || (O) |Web Video Production
> --
>
301 - 400 of 5007 matches
Mail list logo