Am 2009-07-28 04:07:23, schrieb snowweb:
>
> I don't know about anyone else, but I'm getting a bit hacked of with this
> 1980's style forum. I'm trying to get to the bottom of an SA issue and this
> list/forum thing is giving me a bigger headache than SA!
It is NOT a forum but a Mailinglist which
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 09:15:05AM +1200, Spiro Harvey wrote:
>
> You'll see giant, colourful, often flashing banners in sigs, and sometimes
> animated avatars if the forum software allows it.
It's not like the administrator has anything to do with it. A more
"technical" forum most likely would h
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009, RW wrote:
Why? Thats a dangerous recommendation, the number of times googles
mail servers get periodically blocked is funny.
I've been using gmail for about six months, and it's not happened to
me. OTOH gmail publishes SPF records, so it would be unwise to use ISP
servers
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 10:01:43 +1000 (EST)
Res wrote:
> > If he sends mail with gmail.com address, he should use gmail's SMTP
> > servers no matter which ISP he's connecting through.
>
> Why? Thats a dangerous recommendation, the number of times googles
> mail servers get periodically blocked is
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 13:27 -0400, Charles Gregory wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, John Hardin wrote:
> >> Yeah, thanks! I'm always forgetting to fix the To line in my replies!
> >> Procmail/Formail will do nicely!
> > Post your snippet when it's working, plz. Thanks.
>
> :0fw
> * ^(To|Cc):.*(use.
**head-note: I know youve not mentioned it to me, but i'll remove your
address only once more, if you got a bitch about any further replies that
will be CC'd to you, bitch to apache org for not having reply-to set.
I'm sick of deleting them :)
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On Tue, July 28, 2009 13:54, RW wrote:
> What exactly do you want that a mailing list can't provide? Avatars,
> pretty colours, banner adverts? Most forum software doesn't even
> support decent threading.
smf does
> And if you think email is obsolete, what are you doing here in the
> first place
On Tue, July 28, 2009 13:07, snowweb wrote:
> I don't know about anyone else, but I'm getting a bit hacked of with this
> 1980's style forum. I'm trying to get to the bottom of an SA issue and this
> list/forum thing is giving me a bigger headache than SA!
if email/sa gives you so much problems w
At 03:17 PM 7/28/2009, you wrote:
Funny that a request for forums would come from nabble... If nabble
users are any indication of what a forum would be like, I think it's
pretty obvious that posting quality would be crap.
Agreed 100%. I've told Nabble they have no permission to archve my pos
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 7:07 AM, snowweb wrote:
>
> I don't know about anyone else, but I'm getting a bit hacked of with this
> 1980's style forum. I'm trying to get to the bottom of an SA issue and this
> list/forum thing is giving me a bigger headache than SA!
>
> Spamassassin has more than one o
Mike Cardwell a écrit :
> Henrik K wrote:
>
>>
>> Good for you. I've signed up for many mailing lists AND forums. There is
>> nothing inherently better or worse in either of them,
>
> No that's wrong, they're quite different and both have advantages and
> disadvantages.
>
so, it's YES, not NO.
snowweb a écrit :
> I don't know about anyone else, but I'm getting a bit hacked of with this
> 1980's style forum. I'm trying to get to the bottom of an SA issue and this
> list/forum thing is giving me a bigger headache than SA!
>
> Spamassassin has more than one or two users now and I personall
Steven W. Orr a écrit :
> On 07/26/09 20:01, quoth RW:
>> On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 18:07:12 -0400
>> "Michael W. Cocke" wrote:
>
>>> There doesn't seem to be a web interface to subscribe/unscribe from
>>> this list. The email address
>>> "users-unsubscr...@spamassassin.apache.org" complains that my
I haven't read all the posts here yet, but I'll give you my experience
with boards. I've been using message boards since the dial up days in
the 80's, and it should be noted I don't speak for SA or its
developers..
The advantage of a mailing list is that the messages are delivered to
your inbox di
2009/7/28 LuKreme :
> On Jul 28, 2009, at 9:01 AM, Lesley Binks wrote:
>>
>> I use a google mail account.
>> That threads messages well
>
> Actually, gmail threads messages very poorly. Threading is a lot more than
> 'put all the messages with one topic into a time-ordered list'.
>
> That said, som
At 01:23 PM 7/28/2009, you wrote:
I've subscribed to the email list. This is, for my purposes, and IMHO,
much superior to any forum.
Why? Because I am subscribed to somewhere over 20 technical and
security lists (I stopped counting long ago - it could be more than 50
by now), and they all come
* snowweb :
> I don't know about anyone else, but I'm getting a bit hacked of with this
> 1980's style forum. I'm trying to get to the bottom of an SA issue and this
> list/forum thing is giving me a bigger headache than SA!
>
> Spamassassin has more than one or two users now and I personally thin
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 04:07, snowweb wrote:
>
> I don't know about anyone else, but I'm getting a bit hacked of with this
> 1980's style forum. I'm trying to get to the bottom of an SA issue and this
> list/forum thing is giving me a bigger headache than SA!
>
> Spamassassin has more than one or
LuKreme wrote:
On Jul 28, 2009, at 9:20 AM, John Rudd wrote:
Besides, usenet/nntp is getting to be a vanishing backwater of the net
these days ... and the only _decent_ nntp reader was "nn", which never
really made its way to the GUI era, much less the web era. In fact,
if you know much about n
On Jul 27, 2009, at 7:51 AM, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
http://pastebin.com/m2cbc0965
Content analysis details: (7.0 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
--
--
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE
LuKreme wrote:
I have in the past looked for stuff that bridges between forums and
mailing lists (or news groups) but it doesn't seem to exist :(
Mailman has a news-gateway module. No idea how/if it works.
I have used it myself. It works very well. Does exactly what it says on
the tin, bid
On Jul 28, 2009, at 9:20 AM, John Rudd wrote:
Besides, usenet/nntp is getting to be a vanishing backwater of the net
these days ... and the only _decent_ nntp reader was "nn", which never
really made its way to the GUI era, much less the web era. In fact,
if you know much about nn, you can proba
On Jul 28, 2009, at 9:01 AM, Lesley Binks wrote:
I use a google mail account.
That threads messages well
Actually, gmail threads messages very poorly. Threading is a lot more
than 'put all the messages with one topic into a time-ordered list'.
That said, some thread support is much better t
On Jul 28, 2009, at 7:25 AM, Dave Walker wrote:
John Rudd wrote:
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Any-one-interested-in-using-a-proper-forum--tp24697144p24697144.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com
.
Any help/suggestions on better RSS
On Jul 28, 2009, at 6:31 AM, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
I have in the past looked for stuff that bridges between forums and
mailing lists (or news groups) but it doesn't seem to exist :(
Mailman has a news-gateway module. No idea how/if it works.
--
If there's a bustle in your hedgerow don't be a
At 10:27 28-07-2009, Charles Gregory wrote:
:0fw
* ^(To|Cc):.*(use...@spamassassin|spamassassin.users)
| /usr/bin/formail -I"Reply-To: users@spamassassin.apache.org"
Match on the List-Id: header instead of the To: or Cc:.
Regards,
-sm
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, John Hardin wrote:
Yeah, thanks! I'm always forgetting to fix the To line in my replies!
Procmail/Formail will do nicely!
Post your snippet when it's working, plz. Thanks.
:0fw
* ^(To|Cc):.*(use...@spamassassin|spamassassin.users)
| /usr/bin/formail -I"Reply-To: users@sp
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, Charles Gregory wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, Dave Walker wrote:
The only criticism i have with the SA list is that the "Reply-To" header
isn't set, meaning most mail clients will reply directly to the person -
rather than the list. Perhaps I should add some procmail foo,
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, Dave Walker wrote:
The only criticism i have with the SA list is that the "Reply-To" header
isn't set, meaning most mail clients will reply directly to the person -
rather than the list. Perhaps I should add some procmail foo, but ho hum.
Oh! (smack forehead)
Yeah, thanks
rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 07:31 -0700, snowweb wrote:
>> spamassassin-forum
>
> One way to get that included in web filter block lists.
>
> Registered through: GoDaddy.com, Inc.
>
> Then I noted;
>
>Administrative Contact:
> Snow, Peter pe...
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 09:01 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, Martin Gregorie wrote:
>
> > Finally a personal point: PLEASE don't implement smilies/emoticons as
> > part of the forum. The WINE mailing list often contains messages from
> > the linked forum that end like this:
> >
>
Mike Cardwell wrote:
Hi,
I just started using the SOUGHT rules for the first time. They seem to
be triggering on emails now, but the default score for hits against the
rules seems to be 3.0 and 4.0. That seems quite high to me. Are these
rules considered to have an extremely low false positiv
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, Martin Gregorie wrote:
Finally a personal point: PLEASE don't implement smilies/emoticons as
part of the forum. The WINE mailing list often contains messages from
the linked forum that end like this:
I find the bit in square brackets, which is an e-mail representation of
Let me see if I follow you correctly there . . . you are administrator of an
email server, but you do not like to read and write email?
Also, I am not a lawyer, but I think I read something somewhere a while ago
that there is some intellectual property rights ownership associated with
'spamassa
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 04:45:31PM +0100, Mike Cardwell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just started using the SOUGHT rules for the first time. They seem to
> be triggering on emails now, but the default score for hits against the
> rules seems to be 3.0 and 4.0. That seems quite high to me. Are these
> r
Hi,
I just started using the SOUGHT rules for the first time. They seem to
be triggering on emails now, but the default score for hits against the
rules seems to be 3.0 and 4.0. That seems quite high to me. Are these
rules considered to have an extremely low false positive impact?
--
Mike Ca
> I have now registered http://www.spamassassin-forum.com
> spamassassin-forum.com and I will make sure that the first sticky thread
> on the forum to be, contains a link to your list, so that our users are free
> to choose. I'm not doing this to compete but to complement. I hope you
> understan
2009/7/28 rich...@buzzhost.co.uk :
> On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 07:31 -0700, snowweb wrote:
>> spamassassin-forum
>
> One way to get that included in web filter block lists.
>
> Registered through: GoDaddy.com, Inc.
>
> Then I noted;
>
> Administrative Contact:
> Snow, Peter pe...@snowwe
> > On 28.07.09 09:19, Curtis LaMasters wrote:
> >> I could understand if you saved every email from the start of the
> >> mailing list as an archive but I would say many of us are "new" to the
> >> list and need support. Therefore we have to rely on search engines to
> >> deliver the content we
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 07:09, RW wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 06:16:38 -0700
> John Rudd wrote:
>
>
>> Personally, when I'm so lightly involved in a message stream that I
>> don't want to be subscribed to the entire list, I prefer to use the
>> RSS interface to a forum (or, an RSS feed into a for
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, snowweb wrote:
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
What kind of a forum do you see?
I use this as an email list, straight from my email application. I don't
use Nabble or Google Groups (whatever those might be..).
Quite convenient. Just subscribe and enjoy.
I wouldn't have inter
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 07:31 -0700, snowweb wrote:
> spamassassin-forum
One way to get that included in web filter block lists.
Registered through: GoDaddy.com, Inc.
Then I noted;
Administrative Contact:
Snow, Peter pe...@snowweb.co.uk
20 Neville Gardens
Emsworth, H
2009/7/28 Matus UHLAR - fantomas :
> On 28.07.09 09:19, Curtis LaMasters wrote:
>> One does already exist though it isn't just Spamassassin.
>> http://www.freespamfilter.org/
>>
>> I'm with snowweb here; mailing list support "seems" very outdated IMO.
>
> No, it is not. It's still perfectly usable.
On 28.07.09 09:19, Curtis LaMasters wrote:
> One does already exist though it isn't just Spamassassin.
> http://www.freespamfilter.org/
>
> I'm with snowweb here; mailing list support "seems" very outdated IMO.
No, it is not. It's still perfectly usable.
> I could understand if you saved every
OK! Thanks guys for all your inputs, regardless off which side of the
discussion you're leaning towards. I read and considered all your pro's and
con's carefully. I'm not trying to pry anyone away from your list (and I'm
sure I won't). I'm just trying to reach out to those who don't want to be a
p
One does already exist though it isn't just Spamassassin.
http://www.freespamfilter.org/
I'm with snowweb here; mailing list support "seems" very outdated IMO.
I could understand if you saved every email from the start of the
mailing list as an archive but I would say many of us are "new" to the
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 06:16:38 -0700
John Rudd wrote:
> Personally, when I'm so lightly involved in a message stream that I
> don't want to be subscribed to the entire list, I prefer to use the
> RSS interface to a forum (or, an RSS feed into a forum). Especially
> if the RSS feed only posts 1 me
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 06:29, McDonald,
Dan wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 06:16 -0700, John Rudd wrote:
>
>> Though ... it'd be nice if there was a direct RSS feed for the users
>> list. Hopefully Nabble isn't my only choice for an RSS feed :-}
>> (esp. since it posts 1 RSS message per email mes
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 06:29, McDonald,
Dan wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 06:16 -0700, John Rudd wrote:
>
>> Though ... it'd be nice if there was a direct RSS feed for the users
>> list. Hopefully Nabble isn't my only choice for an RSS feed :-}
>> (esp. since it posts 1 RSS message per email mes
Le 28/07/2009 15:31, Mike Cardwell a écrit :
For those using Thunderbird, I have an addon installed named "Reply to
mailing list" which adds a button "Reply list" inbetween "Reply" and
"Reply All" which has been very useful.
For that matter, for those using Thunderbird 3.0b3, this feature is
b
Dave Walker wrote:
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Any-one-interested-in-using-a-proper-forum--tp24697144p24697144.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Any help/suggestions on better RSS feeds for this list would be appreciated :-)
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 06:16 -0700, John Rudd wrote:
> Though ... it'd be nice if there was a direct RSS feed for the users
> list. Hopefully Nabble isn't my only choice for an RSS feed :-}
> (esp. since it posts 1 RSS message per email message, and only appears
> to do periodic RSS updates, not m
John Rudd wrote:
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/Any-one-interested-in-using-a-proper-forum--tp24697144p24697144.html
>> Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> Any help/suggestions on better RSS feeds for this list would be appreciated
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Any-one-interested-in-using-a-proper-forum--tp24697144p24697144.html
> Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
He's clearly using Nabble, and thinks that's the primary interface for
the list ...
So, Peter, if
- "Stefan" wrote:
> --[ UxBoD ]--:
> > - "Matus UHLAR - fantomas" wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 11:20 +0100, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
> > > > > > Would somebody please let me know what is required to get it
> to
> > > work
> > >
> > > > > :) I have installed the Perl module and ena
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, snowweb wrote:
> I'm trying to view these threads online, it's obvious that this is
> more orientated to mailing list users, buy the two minutes effort
> that they spent building the online 'forum' type interface. I notice
> that when you compare the install base of SpamAssassi
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 04:50 -0700, snowweb wrote:
>
>
> Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> >
> >
> > What kind of a forum do you see?
> >
> > I use this as an email list, straight from my email application. I don't
> > use Nabble or Google Groups (whatever those might be..).
> >
> > Quite convenient.
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 04:50 -0700, snowweb wrote:
> Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> > What kind of a forum do you see?
> >
> > I use this as an email list, straight from my email application. I don't
> > use Nabble or Google Groups (whatever those might be..).
> >
> > Quite convenient. Just subscribe a
--[ UxBoD ]--:
> - "Matus UHLAR - fantomas" wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 11:20 +0100, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
> > > > > Would somebody please let me know what is required to get it to
> > work
> >
> > > > :) I have installed the Perl module and enabled the plugin but
> > it never appears
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 06:28:39 -0700
jd wrote:
> Neil Schwartzman さんは書きました:
> >
> > This is a tough row to ho, and I've not gone down this road in a
> > while but cunillingus is misspelt, potentially leading to the lack
> > of reaction. By your rules.
>
> What's wrong with "whore"? Why is it "ho
Henrik K wrote:
Mailing lists are much better. I'm signed up for a couple of dozen
mailing lists and they pretty much all work exactly the same. I don't
want to learn a couple of dozen different types of web based forum
software.
When I send a message to a mailing list, it gets pushed out
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 12:54 +0100, RW wrote:
> > I don't know about anyone else, but I'm getting a bit hacked of with
> > this 1980's style forum. I'm trying to get to the bottom of an SA
> > issue and this list/forum thing is giving me a bigger headache than
> > SA!
[...]
> And if you think email
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 04:07:23 -0700 (PDT)
snowweb wrote:
>
> I don't know about anyone else, but I'm getting a bit hacked of with
> this 1980's style forum. I'm trying to get to the bottom of an SA
> issue and this list/forum thing is giving me a bigger headache than
> SA!
>
> Spamassassin has m
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 11:29:26 +0100 (BST)
"--[ UxBoD ]--" wrote:
> - "Mariusz Kruk" wrote:
>
> > The plugin itself only adds metadata to the message. You need to
> > configure SA to use this metadata.
> > http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RelayCountryPlugin
> >
> > --
> Thats the issue
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 12:29:53PM +0100, Mike Cardwell wrote:
> Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>
>>> I don't know about anyone else, but I'm getting a bit
>>> hacked of with this 1980's style forum. I'm trying to get
>>> to the bottom of an SA issue and this list/forum thing is
>>> giving me a bigger hea
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>
>
> What kind of a forum do you see?
>
> I use this as an email list, straight from my email application. I don't
> use Nabble or Google Groups (whatever those might be..).
>
> Quite convenient. Just subscribe and enjoy.
>
>
I'm trying to view these threads onlin
snowweb wrote:
I don't know about anyone else, but I'm getting a bit hacked of with this
1980's style forum. I'm trying to get to the bottom of an SA issue and this
list/forum thing is giving me a bigger headache than SA!
Spamassassin has more than one or two users now and I personally think tha
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 12:29 +0100, Mike Cardwell wrote:
> Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> > Snoweb wrote:
>
> >> I don't know about anyone else, but I'm getting a bit
> >> hacked of with this 1980's style forum. I'm trying to get
> >> to the bottom of an SA issue and this list/forum thing is
> >> giving
On Jul 28, 2009, at 5:07 AM, snowweb wrote:
I know it's free and all that, but even so, if this is the only form
of
support they provide, I'm thinking that I'll just start an alternative
support forum, using standard, full featured forum software (like
SMF).
Good luck with that. HTML/WWW i
- "snowweb" wrote:
> I don't know about anyone else, but I'm getting a bit hacked of with
> this
> 1980's style forum. I'm trying to get to the bottom of an SA issue and
> this
> list/forum thing is giving me a bigger headache than SA!
>
> Spamassassin has more than one or two users now and
Neil Schwartzman さんは書きました:
>
> This is a tough row to ho, and I've not gone down this road in a while but
> cunillingus is misspelt, potentially leading to the lack of reaction. By
> your rules.
What's wrong with "whore"? Why is it "ho" now?
How do you "ho" a row anyways?
Mixed metaphors, no e
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
I don't know about anyone else, but I'm getting a bit
hacked of with this 1980's style forum. I'm trying to get
to the bottom of an SA issue and this list/forum thing is
giving me a bigger headache than SA!
Spamassassin has more than one or two users now and I
personal
> I don't know about anyone else, but I'm getting a bit
> hacked of with this 1980's style forum. I'm trying to get
> to the bottom of an SA issue and this list/forum thing is
> giving me a bigger headache than SA!
What kind of a forum do you see?
I use this as an email list, straight from my em
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 04:07 -0700, snowweb wrote:
> I don't know about anyone else, but I'm getting a bit hacked of with this
> 1980's style forum. I'm trying to get to the bottom of an SA issue and this
> list/forum thing is giving me a bigger headache than SA!
If you have difficulty with an email
> I don't know about anyone else, but I'm getting a bit
> hacked of with this 1980's style forum. I'm trying to get
> to the bottom of an SA issue and this list/forum thing is
> giving me a bigger headache than SA!
>
> Spamassassin has more than one or two users now and I
> personally think that
I don't know about anyone else, but I'm getting a bit hacked of with this
1980's style forum. I'm trying to get to the bottom of an SA issue and this
list/forum thing is giving me a bigger headache than SA!
Spamassassin has more than one or two users now and I personally think that
it should have
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 11:49 +0100, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
> > You say that you installed the Perl module - you mean the
> > RelayCountry
> > plugin or the IP::Country::Fast module? (needed by the RC module)
> IP::Country::Fast as defined in the requirements.
Does `spamassassin --lint --debug' say a
- "Matus UHLAR - fantomas" wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 11:20 +0100, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
> > > > Would somebody please let me know what is required to get it to
> work
> > > :) I have installed the Perl module and enabled the plugin but
> it
> > > never appears to hit :(
>
> > -
> > On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 11:20 +0100, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
> > > Would somebody please let me know what is required to get it to work
> > :) I have installed the Perl module and enabled the plugin but it
> > never appears to hit :(
> - "Mariusz Kruk" wrote:
> > The plugin itself only adds m
snowweb wrote:
What makes you think anyone can answer that? The message you posted to
pastebin for us to test and review was nonexistent.
What is 'pastebin' and how do I use it?
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=pastebin
--
Mike Cardwell - IT Consultant and LAMP developer
Cardwell IT Ltd. (UK Reg'd Comp
- "Mariusz Kruk" wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 11:29 +0100, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
> > - "Mariusz Kruk" wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 11:20 +0100, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Would somebody please let me know what is required to get it to
> work
> > > :) I
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>
>
> What makes you think anyone can answer that? The message you posted to
> pastebin for us to test and review was nonexistent.
>
>
What is 'pastebin' and how do I use it?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Many-rules-not-being-used--tp246961
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 11:29 +0100, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
> - "Mariusz Kruk" wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 11:20 +0100, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Would somebody please let me know what is required to get it to work
> > :) I have installed the Perl module and enabled the
> The following is the spam headers of a message received:
>
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01)
> on s1.snowweb.info X-Spam-Level:
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.6 required=4.7
>tests=HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY, RELAYCOUNTRY_FR
> autolearn=no version=3.2.4
> X-S
- "Mariusz Kruk" wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 11:20 +0100, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Would somebody please let me know what is required to get it to work
> :) I have installed the Perl module and enabled the plugin but it
> never appears to hit :(
>
> The plugin itself only ad
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 11:20 +0100, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Would somebody please let me know what is required to get it to work :) I
> have installed the Perl module and enabled the plugin but it never appears to
> hit :(
The plugin itself only adds metadata to the message. You need to
Hi,
Would somebody please let me know what is required to get it to work :) I have
installed the Perl module and enabled the plugin but it never appears to hit :(
Best Regards,
--
SplatNIX IT Services :: Innovation through collaboration
The following is the spam headers of a message received:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on s1.snowweb.info
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.6 required=4.7 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,
RELAYCOUNTRY_FR autolearn=no version=3.2.4
X-Spam-Relay-Count
>> On 26.07.09 22:09, r...@ausics.net wrote:
>>> If you are sending out from your dynamic home connection, you are going to
>>> have bigger problems, most of the big ISP's and many many many others
>>> block at MTA level for your type of connections, either get a static IP
>>> *and* a real PTR entr
89 matches
Mail list logo
