RE: (313) Fw: Dex and FX with Kirk Degiorgio

2003-05-28 Thread yussel
it has nothing to do with djs. in fact, the 'rave act' is no longer even
called that. its now the 'illicit drug anti-proliferation act'.

the law has to do with venue operations and ownership.

if someone does drugs in a club, arena, ampitheater, bar, resturaunt,
hotel... then the owner of said establishment as well as the operator,
leasee or temporary promoter can be found guilty of providing a place for
drug usage, similar in legal terms to running a crack house.

more info at-

www.drugpolicy.org  and  www.emdef.org




On Fri, 23 May 2003, robin pinning wrote:


 yeah that's what i'm getting at. in fact track selection (brendan
 mentions it at the end of the below post) is more important
 to the hi-tech dj.

 another thought:

 from what i can gather the Rave Act in the US classifies a party with no
 djs and just live acts as something other than a rave and the law is less
 stringent (please correct if wrong). So is a DJ with a powerbook and
 ableton live now a live act and not dj?

 will this change things?

 robin...


  I would agree that traditional DJs listening to mixes done in things
  like Ableton will try to copy some of the techniques they hear, and that
  this will also help the traditional form of mixing to progress and
  absorb new ideas. For example, the first time I heard proper booty music
  was back in 1996 when I got a tape from 12 Tech Mob - the tape had been
  recorded using multitracking and various other tricks, but at the time I
  didn't know - I thought it was a straight mix.
 
  So off I went, spending the next few years gathering booty and
  ghetto-tech records and attempting to emulate the frenetic multi-layered
  action you get on the mix tape. When I eventually found out that the mix
  was not recorded live, of course, I realised I'd been wasting my time,
  but in the process of trying to do the whole thing live I'd learnt a
  whole bunch of new tricks and had generally upped the standard of my
  mixing, which was a good thing. And did it make me value the tape any
  less? No! It was just as enjoyable a listening experience, whether it
  had been put together by NASA or by a demented child with sticky tape.
 
  I definitely don't think straight-turntable mixing is dead, and won't be
  for a long time. And when I say long time, I'm speaking in
  generational terms, not the next few years. Even if the future sees us
  all with ableton/final scratch and so on within about a five years, the
  fact of the matter will remain that if your basic track selection skills
  are lacking then you won't do very well.
 
  Brendan




Re: (313) Fw: Dex and FX with Kirk Degiorgio

2003-05-23 Thread robin pinning

wow i look forward to this, i'm surprised we've not seen more of this type
of mix (there's scion and de2 and that 2 many djs) around as there's
several packages that can do this now.

so is this approach the logical progression of the megamix wher you use a
multitrack tape?

and is this likely to encourage new ways of djing live?

it's friday i fancy discussing something :)

cheers

robin...

 ARTIST: VARIOUS
 MIXED BY : KIRK DEGIORGIO
 TITLE: F.X.MIX.01.
 LABEL: KEEP DIGGIN
 FORMAT: CD
 RELEASE DATE: 21 JULY 2003

 FEATURING: JOHN BELTRAN, PHIL ASHER, PANOPTICA, KYOTO JAZZ MASSIVE,
 RED NOSE DISTRICT, TROUBLE MAN (AKA MARK PRITCHARD) + + +

 Kirk Degiorgio - Master of the electronic beat, delves into his box of
 trickery with Ableton's new software package to create a unique mix of Latin
 house, broken beats and techno. This is a mix compilation, but not as we
 know it!

 Using Ableton's new 'Live' software has enabled Kirk to loop/edit/remix
 parts of each track live, inducing unique and twisted mixes of each
 individual track whilst in the mix. ultimately making this a highly
 individual audio highlight from start to finish. All this and more, and we
 haven't even approached the track listing yet!

 So, lets start with the labels involved here: Compost, JCR, Versatile,
 Ubiquity, Far Out, Mantis and Certificate 18. All leading labels in their
 chosen fields. We move on to the artists and remixers: Kyoto Jazz Massive, 4
 Hero, Phil Asher presents Focus, Magic Number, Victor Davies, John Arnold
 and Jimpster. All leading pioneers in their chosen sound. There are two
 exclusive tracks courtesy of Kirk Degiorgio himself - Exclusively
 commissioned for this project only.

 Kirk Degiorgio, Ableton's 'Live' box of effects and Keep Diggin welcome you
 to the future.

 TRACKLIST
 (Please note that due to the nature of this mix, the tracks are in no
 particular order)

 Clashing Egos - Brightness In The Morning (Kirk Degiorgio remix)
 Dutch techno (Max404) meets broken beats compliments of Kirk Degiorgio's
 classy reworking..

 Kyoto Jazz Massive - The Brightness of These Days (Quantic remix)
 Released on the mighty Compost label, this is arguably Quantic's best work
 to date - Tempo shifting, foot stomping, sweaty afro-jazz.

 Magic Number - Sorry
 Frantically paced Latin number from the Mantis stables.

 Ourtime - Slack
 Minimal techno from UK underground label Ourtime.

 Panoptica - She's in Fiesta's (Bauhaus remix)
 Dubby tech-house shocker on drum  bass label Certificate 18!

 Red Nose Distrikt - NYB
 Carl Craig style breakbeats from Holland's Rush Hour label.

 Phil Asher presents Focus - Having Your Fun (4 Hero remix)
 Excellent track from the ever consistent Phil Asher remixed by the mighty 4
 Hero compliments of Versatile records.

 John Beltran - Felicidad Nova (Jimpster remix)
 Latin house hero John Beltran's original uplifting anthem remixed by the
 mighty Jimpster on Ubiquity records..

 John Arnold - Fabric
 Nu-jazz techno stylee from Ubiquity's John Arnold.Cool as!

 Victor Davies - Lady Luck (Procreation remix)
 Highly percussive nu-jazz vocal number from the ever consistent
 Jazzanova-Compost Records camp.

 Trouble Man - Where We Stand
 Troubleman - Also known as one Mr Mark Pritchard, one half of Global
 Communications, releasing his debut under a new alter ego guise on Far Out
 Recordings.

 Filta Facta - Electrik Shok
 Filtered jazz/funk/disco house number..Not your usual house music by numbers
 though - This is much more intelligent.Summers here!

 Blue Binary - Crescendo
 Stripped down and looped grooves exclusive to this album.

 Family Affairs - Open Values
 More stripped down and looped grooves exclusive to this album.




RE: (313) Fw: Dex and FX with Kirk Degiorgio

2003-05-23 Thread Brendan Nelson
I look forward to it too - well done to Alex, by the way, who I notice
has one of his OurTime tracks on the compilation! :)

Anyway, on the point of this being a new form of mix - I think it is the
logical progression on from the Hotmix 5 style megamix, and I am
prepared to argue the point.

First off, the argument that a mix is only really valid if it's made
on purely two turntables and mixer - I can see the point of view, but am
reminded when I hear this argument of people who once said that music
wasn't valid unless it was played live, on real instruments. It seems
to me that since the very early days of our strand of music (Ron Hardy
at the Music Box, etc) the best DJs have basically used the technology
they have available, to the fullest extent possible, to give people an
enriching and fresh experience on the dancefloor. Using technology to
augment the basic components of traditional DJing is actually not a new
idea; it's older than house music itself.

Second off, the argument that it's cheating - I agree with this
argument, but *only if* the DJ in question is presenting his
digitally-assembled mix as if it had been recorded live. The only way
someone can do this is to deliberately create some slightly dodgy
mixes and transitions in order to have that air of authenticity, to
avoid using the more advanced functionality of the software in question,
and to also put in artifically long breaks between mixes, projecting the
illusion that they are flipping through records while in fact their
mouse is simply hovering over the next track the whole time. So, yes,
people are cheating if they go to the effort of hobbling their digital
mixes so that they sound real, and if they then present these mixes to
people as though they are real.

However, anyone who used something like Ableton in this way - going to
all that effort to hide the fact that they've done a digital mix - would
be seriously missing the point, IMHO. Ableton enables people to do
things that you could never even hope to achieve on a traditional decks
setup, and it's with this in mind that people should approach doing
mixes in Ableton. Basically, Ableton gives you the potential to make
something that's less a mix, more a bizarre hybrid between mixing,
sampling and composition. So we should think of Ableton-produced mixes
and traditional decks'n'mixer mixes as two completely different
entities. 

The DJ making a mix with Ableton has a much higher bar, so to speak,
than the person making a mix with decks. They can't just segue from one
track to another and expect praise. They need to use Ableton to its full
extent, and give us listeners an experience that we could never get from
a person (no matter how skilled) with just a pair of Technics. And if
they do, then they deserve respect for that, and don't deserve to be
shouted down for not having used decks.

I can well imagine that if someone took a laptop with Ableton to a club
and started DJing out with it, a lot of people would go up to them and
slate them for not using decks. But a skilled user of Ableton would
quite quickly, I think, be able to silence the haters by showing them
exactly what they can do with it. 

So my message is - digital mixing is indeed crap and cheating if the
person involved is just making mixes that could be made on decks; but it
allows people to go much further than just that, and the more people who
come out and show just what this technology can do will, IMHO, go on to
create a sort of hybrid art form which will probably change the way we
listen to music, both at home and out in the clubs.

Brendan

 -Original Message-
 From: robin pinning [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 23 May 2003 11:21
 To: 313@hyperreal.org
 Subject: Re: (313) Fw: Dex and FX with Kirk Degiorgio
 
 
 
 wow i look forward to this, i'm surprised we've not seen more 
 of this type
 of mix (there's scion and de2 and that 2 many djs) around as there's
 several packages that can do this now.
 
 so is this approach the logical progression of the megamix 
 wher you use a
 multitrack tape?
 
 and is this likely to encourage new ways of djing live?
 
 it's friday i fancy discussing something :)
 
 cheers
 
 robin...
 
  ARTIST: VARIOUS
  MIXED BY : KIRK DEGIORGIO
  TITLE: F.X.MIX.01.
  LABEL: KEEP DIGGIN
  FORMAT: CD
  RELEASE DATE: 21 JULY 2003
 
  FEATURING: JOHN BELTRAN, PHIL ASHER, PANOPTICA, KYOTO JAZZ MASSIVE,
  RED NOSE DISTRICT, TROUBLE MAN (AKA MARK PRITCHARD) + + +
 
  Kirk Degiorgio - Master of the electronic beat, delves into 
 his box of
  trickery with Ableton's new software package to create a 
 unique mix of Latin
  house, broken beats and techno. This is a mix compilation, 
 but not as we
  know it!
 
  Using Ableton's new 'Live' software has enabled Kirk to 
 loop/edit/remix
  parts of each track live, inducing unique and twisted mixes of each
  individual track whilst in the mix. ultimately making this a highly
  individual audio highlight from start to finish. All this 
 and more

RE: (313) Fw: Dex and FX with Kirk Degiorgio

2003-05-23 Thread Odeluga, Ken
For me, I don't feel we've even scratched the surface of what could be done
live with ableton or final-scratch.

People are still more or less mp3-ing doing whole tracks, not really messing
with interesting short elements in themselves, which could be used to create
something different in themselves, not really using the effects at all!

But maybe I just haven't heard it done and it has been! I didn't hear the
legendary Surgeon set at ATP ferinstance.

k
-Original Message-
From: robin pinning [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2003 11:21 AM
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) Fw: Dex and FX with Kirk Degiorgio



wow i look forward to this, i'm surprised we've not seen more of this type
of mix (there's scion and de2 and that 2 many djs) around as there's
several packages that can do this now.

so is this approach the logical progression of the megamix wher you use a
multitrack tape?

and is this likely to encourage new ways of djing live?

it's friday i fancy discussing something :)

cheers

robin...

 ARTIST: VARIOUS
 MIXED BY : KIRK DEGIORGIO
 TITLE: F.X.MIX.01.
 LABEL: KEEP DIGGIN
 FORMAT: CD
 RELEASE DATE: 21 JULY 2003

 FEATURING: JOHN BELTRAN, PHIL ASHER, PANOPTICA, KYOTO JAZZ MASSIVE,
 RED NOSE DISTRICT, TROUBLE MAN (AKA MARK PRITCHARD) + + +

 Kirk Degiorgio - Master of the electronic beat, delves into his box of
 trickery with Ableton's new software package to create a unique
mix of Latin
 house, broken beats and techno. This is a mix compilation, but not as we
 know it!

 Using Ableton's new 'Live' software has enabled Kirk to loop/edit/remix
 parts of each track live, inducing unique and twisted mixes of each
 individual track whilst in the mix. ultimately making this a highly
 individual audio highlight from start to finish. All this and
more, and we
 haven't even approached the track listing yet!

 So, lets start with the labels involved here: Compost, JCR, Versatile,
 Ubiquity, Far Out, Mantis and Certificate 18. All leading labels in their
 chosen fields. We move on to the artists and remixers: Kyoto
Jazz Massive, 4
 Hero, Phil Asher presents Focus, Magic Number, Victor Davies, John Arnold
 and Jimpster. All leading pioneers in their chosen sound. There are two
 exclusive tracks courtesy of Kirk Degiorgio himself - Exclusively
 commissioned for this project only.

 Kirk Degiorgio, Ableton's 'Live' box of effects and Keep Diggin
welcome you
 to the future.

 TRACKLIST
 (Please note that due to the nature of this mix, the tracks are in no
 particular order)

 Clashing Egos - Brightness In The Morning (Kirk Degiorgio remix)
 Dutch techno (Max404) meets broken beats compliments of Kirk Degiorgio's
 classy reworking..

 Kyoto Jazz Massive - The Brightness of These Days (Quantic remix)
 Released on the mighty Compost label, this is arguably Quantic's
best work
 to date - Tempo shifting, foot stomping, sweaty afro-jazz.

 Magic Number - Sorry
 Frantically paced Latin number from the Mantis stables.

 Ourtime - Slack
 Minimal techno from UK underground label Ourtime.

 Panoptica - She's in Fiesta's (Bauhaus remix)
 Dubby tech-house shocker on drum  bass label Certificate 18!

 Red Nose Distrikt - NYB
 Carl Craig style breakbeats from Holland's Rush Hour label.

 Phil Asher presents Focus - Having Your Fun (4 Hero remix)
 Excellent track from the ever consistent Phil Asher remixed by
the mighty 4
 Hero compliments of Versatile records.

 John Beltran - Felicidad Nova (Jimpster remix)
 Latin house hero John Beltran's original uplifting anthem remixed by the
 mighty Jimpster on Ubiquity records..

 John Arnold - Fabric
 Nu-jazz techno stylee from Ubiquity's John Arnold.Cool as!

 Victor Davies - Lady Luck (Procreation remix)
 Highly percussive nu-jazz vocal number from the ever consistent
 Jazzanova-Compost Records camp.

 Trouble Man - Where We Stand
 Troubleman - Also known as one Mr Mark Pritchard, one half of Global
 Communications, releasing his debut under a new alter ego guise
on Far Out
 Recordings.

 Filta Facta - Electrik Shok
 Filtered jazz/funk/disco house number..Not your usual house
music by numbers
 though - This is much more intelligent.Summers here!

 Blue Binary - Crescendo
 Stripped down and looped grooves exclusive to this album.

 Family Affairs - Open Values
 More stripped down and looped grooves exclusive to this album.





RE: (313) Fw: Dex and FX with Kirk Degiorgio

2003-05-23 Thread Remco . Doorewaard

Another question, a few years ago ( i think around 1994/1995) I had a tape
with a mix cd from Kirk Degeorgio on it, with tracks from Herbie Hancock
f.i..


I lost this tape and don't know the title anymore, can anybody help me with
this?


Remco




RE: (313) Fw: Dex and FX with Kirk Degiorgio

2003-05-23 Thread Robert Taylor
It was called Check One and, IMNSHO is absolutely stunning in the way it mixes 
jazz with techno - you can appreciate the comparisons after hearing that!

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2003 10:50 AM
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: (313) Fw: Dex and FX with Kirk Degiorgio



Another question, a few years ago ( i think around 1994/1995) I had a tape
with a mix cd from Kirk Degeorgio on it, with tracks from Herbie Hancock
f.i..


I lost this tape and don't know the title anymore, can anybody help me with
this?


Remco


#
Note:

Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent 
those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically stated. This 
email 
and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the 
individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this 
email in 
error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thank You.
#



Re: (313) Fw: Dex and FX with Kirk Degiorgio

2003-05-23 Thread Martin
Surgeon played at Tfunkshun a couple of weeks ago, and I know Scott is on
this list, any chance of a report Scott?

23/5/03 10:49 AM Odeluga, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 For me, I don't feel we've even scratched the surface of what could be done
 live with ableton or final-scratch.
 
 People are still more or less mp3-ing doing whole tracks, not really messing
 with interesting short elements in themselves, which could be used to create
 something different in themselves, not really using the effects at all!
 
 But maybe I just haven't heard it done and it has been! I didn't hear the
 legendary Surgeon set at ATP ferinstance.
 
 k
 -Original Message-
 From: robin pinning [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, May 23, 2003 11:21 AM
 To: 313@hyperreal.org
 Subject: Re: (313) Fw: Dex and FX with Kirk Degiorgio
 
 
 
 wow i look forward to this, i'm surprised we've not seen more of this type
 of mix (there's scion and de2 and that 2 many djs) around as there's
 several packages that can do this now.
 
 so is this approach the logical progression of the megamix wher you use a
 multitrack tape?
 
 and is this likely to encourage new ways of djing live?
 
 it's friday i fancy discussing something :)
 
 cheers
 
 robin...
 
 ARTIST: VARIOUS
 MIXED BY : KIRK DEGIORGIO
 TITLE: F.X.MIX.01.
 LABEL: KEEP DIGGIN
 FORMAT: CD
 RELEASE DATE: 21 JULY 2003
 
 FEATURING: JOHN BELTRAN, PHIL ASHER, PANOPTICA, KYOTO JAZZ MASSIVE,
 RED NOSE DISTRICT, TROUBLE MAN (AKA MARK PRITCHARD) + + +
 
 Kirk Degiorgio - Master of the electronic beat, delves into his box of
 trickery with Ableton's new software package to create a unique
 mix of Latin
 house, broken beats and techno. This is a mix compilation, but not as we
 know it!
 
 Using Ableton's new 'Live' software has enabled Kirk to loop/edit/remix
 parts of each track live, inducing unique and twisted mixes of each
 individual track whilst in the mix. ultimately making this a highly
 individual audio highlight from start to finish. All this and
 more, and we
 haven't even approached the track listing yet!
 
 So, lets start with the labels involved here: Compost, JCR, Versatile,
 Ubiquity, Far Out, Mantis and Certificate 18. All leading labels in their
 chosen fields. We move on to the artists and remixers: Kyoto
 Jazz Massive, 4
 Hero, Phil Asher presents Focus, Magic Number, Victor Davies, John Arnold
 and Jimpster. All leading pioneers in their chosen sound. There are two
 exclusive tracks courtesy of Kirk Degiorgio himself - Exclusively
 commissioned for this project only.
 
 Kirk Degiorgio, Ableton's 'Live' box of effects and Keep Diggin
 welcome you
 to the future.
 
 TRACKLIST
 (Please note that due to the nature of this mix, the tracks are in no
 particular order)
 
 Clashing Egos - Brightness In The Morning (Kirk Degiorgio remix)
 Dutch techno (Max404) meets broken beats compliments of Kirk Degiorgio's
 classy reworking..
 
 Kyoto Jazz Massive - The Brightness of These Days (Quantic remix)
 Released on the mighty Compost label, this is arguably Quantic's
 best work
 to date - Tempo shifting, foot stomping, sweaty afro-jazz.
 
 Magic Number - Sorry
 Frantically paced Latin number from the Mantis stables.
 
 Ourtime - Slack
 Minimal techno from UK underground label Ourtime.
 
 Panoptica - She's in Fiesta's (Bauhaus remix)
 Dubby tech-house shocker on drum  bass label Certificate 18!
 
 Red Nose Distrikt - NYB
 Carl Craig style breakbeats from Holland's Rush Hour label.
 
 Phil Asher presents Focus - Having Your Fun (4 Hero remix)
 Excellent track from the ever consistent Phil Asher remixed by
 the mighty 4
 Hero compliments of Versatile records.
 
 John Beltran - Felicidad Nova (Jimpster remix)
 Latin house hero John Beltran's original uplifting anthem remixed by the
 mighty Jimpster on Ubiquity records..
 
 John Arnold - Fabric
 Nu-jazz techno stylee from Ubiquity's John Arnold.Cool as!
 
 Victor Davies - Lady Luck (Procreation remix)
 Highly percussive nu-jazz vocal number from the ever consistent
 Jazzanova-Compost Records camp.
 
 Trouble Man - Where We Stand
 Troubleman - Also known as one Mr Mark Pritchard, one half of Global
 Communications, releasing his debut under a new alter ego guise
 on Far Out
 Recordings.
 
 Filta Facta - Electrik Shok
 Filtered jazz/funk/disco house number..Not your usual house
 music by numbers
 though - This is much more intelligent.Summers here!
 
 Blue Binary - Crescendo
 Stripped down and looped grooves exclusive to this album.
 
 Family Affairs - Open Values
 More stripped down and looped grooves exclusive to this album.
 
 
 
 



RE: (313) Fw: Dex and FX with Kirk Degiorgio

2003-05-23 Thread Robert Taylor
Here is the tracklisting:
1 T'Raenon (Version) Photek Photek 00:07:17  
 
2 Air Bag Local Zero 
 
3 Solina Jedi Knights  00:11:04  
 
4 Utopia Planetia Stasis  00:08:28  
 
5 Las Palmas Joe Henderson  00:00:27  
 
6 Prologue / Love, Love Julian Priester / Pepo Mtoto  00:19:12  
 
7 Veil Blue Binary 
 
8 Id Clones Shake  00:09:26  
 
9 Vortex Sean Deason  00:06:55  
 
10 Meditative Fusion Silent Phase  00:06:07  
 
11 Nuron Neau Rouge 
 
12 Microlovr 69  00:08:02  
 
13 Attention Please 4th Wave  00:07:59  
 
14 Flights of Fantasy Elegy  00:08:02  
 
15 Terra Firma Joe Henderson 
 
16 Inner Space Bobby Lyle 
 
17 Non-Stop Home Weather Report  00:03:52  
 
18 Epic As One  00:12:59  
 
19 Nobu Herbie Hancock  00:07:39  
 
20 Olivine The Black Dog  00:06:14  
 
21 The Third Ear Ballet Mechanique 
 
22 Everlast Phenomyna 
 
23 Soon Repeat 
 

-Original Message-
From: Robert Taylor 
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2003 11:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: (313) Fw: Dex and FX with Kirk Degiorgio


It was called Check One and, IMNSHO is absolutely stunning in the way it mixes 
jazz with techno - you can appreciate the comparisons after hearing that!

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2003 10:50 AM
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: (313) Fw: Dex and FX with Kirk Degiorgio



Another question, a few years ago ( i think around 1994/1995) I had a tape
with a mix cd from Kirk Degeorgio on it, with tracks from Herbie Hancock
f.i..


I lost this tape and don't know the title anymore, can anybody help me with
this?


Remco


#
Note:

Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent 
those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically stated. This 
email 
and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the 
individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this 
email in 
error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thank You.
#


#
Note:

Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent 
those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically stated. This 
email 
and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the 
individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this 
email in 
error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thank You.
#



RE: (313) Fw: Dex and FX with Kirk Degiorgio

2003-05-23 Thread Robert Taylor
Weird - this appeared in my box twice but I only sent it once.
Herbie Hancock's Nobu is on this - now that is techno!

-Original Message-
From: Robert Taylor 
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2003 12:02 PM
To: Robert Taylor; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: (313) Fw: Dex and FX with Kirk Degiorgio


Here is the tracklisting:
1 T'Raenon (Version) Photek Photek 00:07:17  
 
2 Air Bag Local Zero 
 
3 Solina Jedi Knights  00:11:04  
 
4 Utopia Planetia Stasis  00:08:28  
 
5 Las Palmas Joe Henderson  00:00:27  
 
6 Prologue / Love, Love Julian Priester / Pepo Mtoto  00:19:12  
 
7 Veil Blue Binary 
 
8 Id Clones Shake  00:09:26  
 
9 Vortex Sean Deason  00:06:55  
 
10 Meditative Fusion Silent Phase  00:06:07  
 
11 Nuron Neau Rouge 
 
12 Microlovr 69  00:08:02  
 
13 Attention Please 4th Wave  00:07:59  
 
14 Flights of Fantasy Elegy  00:08:02  
 
15 Terra Firma Joe Henderson 
 
16 Inner Space Bobby Lyle 
 
17 Non-Stop Home Weather Report  00:03:52  
 
18 Epic As One  00:12:59  
 
19 Nobu Herbie Hancock  00:07:39  
 
20 Olivine The Black Dog  00:06:14  
 
21 The Third Ear Ballet Mechanique 
 
22 Everlast Phenomyna 
 
23 Soon Repeat 
 

-Original Message-
From: Robert Taylor 
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2003 11:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: (313) Fw: Dex and FX with Kirk Degiorgio


It was called Check One and, IMNSHO is absolutely stunning in the way it mixes 
jazz with techno - you can appreciate the comparisons after hearing that!

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2003 10:50 AM
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: (313) Fw: Dex and FX with Kirk Degiorgio



Another question, a few years ago ( i think around 1994/1995) I had a tape
with a mix cd from Kirk Degeorgio on it, with tracks from Herbie Hancock
f.i..


I lost this tape and don't know the title anymore, can anybody help me with
this?


Remco


#
Note:

Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent 
those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically stated. This 
email 
and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the 
individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this 
email in 
error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thank You.
#


#
Note:

Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent 
those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically stated. This 
email 
and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the 
individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this 
email in 
error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thank You.
#



RE: (313) Fw: Dex and FX with Kirk Degiorgio

2003-05-23 Thread Alex Bates
oh my god my 2nd favourite photek tune of all time!

i thought this was the 313 list!

ab

-Original Message-
From: Robert Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2003 9:32 PM
To: Robert Taylor; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: (313) Fw: Dex and FX with Kirk Degiorgio


Here is the tracklisting:
1 T'Raenon (Version) Photek Photek 00:07:17  
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 1/27/2003



RE: (313) Fw: Dex and FX with Kirk Degiorgio

2003-05-23 Thread robin pinning

i agree with brendans post below. the software approach only becomes
invalid when the mix is presented in a trad 2x1200 and a mixer way (like a
lot of these main stream protooled juke-box style mixes)

i was listening to the megamix on the techno 1 - the new dance sound
compilation the other day and noticed (over)use of the spin back which i
guess made a lot of people see that this could be used when mixing in a live 
(not
megamix) setting.

so when a dj hears some interesting approach done in software is he/she
more likely to try and reproduce this sort of this on decks?

i think he/she is, so i'm quite excited by all this. it's amazing what can
be done with a simple sampler, decent eqs and a delay live...this all
bodes well for the future of djing (as does the use of FS, so adding your
own edits into the mix).

i see there's another article in Jockey Slut this month saying that mixing
records together is an out of date approach. i beg to differ.


robin...

 I look forward to it too - well done to Alex, by the way, who I notice
 has one of his OurTime tracks on the compilation! :)

 Anyway, on the point of this being a new form of mix - I think it is the
 logical progression on from the Hotmix 5 style megamix, and I am
 prepared to argue the point.

 First off, the argument that a mix is only really valid if it's made
 on purely two turntables and mixer - I can see the point of view, but am
 reminded when I hear this argument of people who once said that music
 wasn't valid unless it was played live, on real instruments. It seems
 to me that since the very early days of our strand of music (Ron Hardy
 at the Music Box, etc) the best DJs have basically used the technology
 they have available, to the fullest extent possible, to give people an
 enriching and fresh experience on the dancefloor. Using technology to
 augment the basic components of traditional DJing is actually not a new
 idea; it's older than house music itself.

 Second off, the argument that it's cheating - I agree with this
 argument, but *only if* the DJ in question is presenting his
 digitally-assembled mix as if it had been recorded live. The only way
 someone can do this is to deliberately create some slightly dodgy
 mixes and transitions in order to have that air of authenticity, to
 avoid using the more advanced functionality of the software in question,
 and to also put in artifically long breaks between mixes, projecting the
 illusion that they are flipping through records while in fact their
 mouse is simply hovering over the next track the whole time. So, yes,
 people are cheating if they go to the effort of hobbling their digital
 mixes so that they sound real, and if they then present these mixes to
 people as though they are real.

 However, anyone who used something like Ableton in this way - going to
 all that effort to hide the fact that they've done a digital mix - would
 be seriously missing the point, IMHO. Ableton enables people to do
 things that you could never even hope to achieve on a traditional decks
 setup, and it's with this in mind that people should approach doing
 mixes in Ableton. Basically, Ableton gives you the potential to make
 something that's less a mix, more a bizarre hybrid between mixing,
 sampling and composition. So we should think of Ableton-produced mixes
 and traditional decks'n'mixer mixes as two completely different
 entities.

 The DJ making a mix with Ableton has a much higher bar, so to speak,
 than the person making a mix with decks. They can't just segue from one
 track to another and expect praise. They need to use Ableton to its full
 extent, and give us listeners an experience that we could never get from
 a person (no matter how skilled) with just a pair of Technics. And if
 they do, then they deserve respect for that, and don't deserve to be
 shouted down for not having used decks.

 I can well imagine that if someone took a laptop with Ableton to a club
 and started DJing out with it, a lot of people would go up to them and
 slate them for not using decks. But a skilled user of Ableton would
 quite quickly, I think, be able to silence the haters by showing them
 exactly what they can do with it.

 So my message is - digital mixing is indeed crap and cheating if the
 person involved is just making mixes that could be made on decks; but it
 allows people to go much further than just that, and the more people who
 come out and show just what this technology can do will, IMHO, go on to
 create a sort of hybrid art form which will probably change the way we



Re: (313) Fw: Dex and FX with Kirk Degiorgio

2003-05-23 Thread ::\)
because you sent it to yourself and the list :)

- Original Message - 
From: Robert Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Robert Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2003 8:03 AM
Subject: RE: (313) Fw: Dex and FX with Kirk Degiorgio


Weird - this appeared in my box twice but I only sent it once.
Herbie Hancock's Nobu is on this - now that is techno!

-Original Message-
From: Robert Taylor
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2003 12:02 PM
To: Robert Taylor; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: (313) Fw: Dex and FX with Kirk Degiorgio


Here is the tracklisting:
1 T'Raenon (Version) Photek Photek 00:07:17

2 Air Bag Local Zero

3 Solina Jedi Knights  00:11:04

4 Utopia Planetia Stasis  00:08:28

5 Las Palmas Joe Henderson  00:00:27

6 Prologue / Love, Love Julian Priester / Pepo Mtoto  00:19:12

7 Veil Blue Binary

8 Id Clones Shake  00:09:26

9 Vortex Sean Deason  00:06:55

10 Meditative Fusion Silent Phase  00:06:07

11 Nuron Neau Rouge

12 Microlovr 69  00:08:02

13 Attention Please 4th Wave  00:07:59

14 Flights of Fantasy Elegy  00:08:02

15 Terra Firma Joe Henderson

16 Inner Space Bobby Lyle

17 Non-Stop Home Weather Report  00:03:52

18 Epic As One  00:12:59

19 Nobu Herbie Hancock  00:07:39

20 Olivine The Black Dog  00:06:14

21 The Third Ear Ballet Mechanique

22 Everlast Phenomyna

23 Soon Repeat


-Original Message-
From: Robert Taylor
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2003 11:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: (313) Fw: Dex and FX with Kirk Degiorgio


It was called Check One and, IMNSHO is absolutely stunning in the way it
mixes jazz with techno - you can appreciate the comparisons after hearing
that!

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2003 10:50 AM
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: (313) Fw: Dex and FX with Kirk Degiorgio



Another question, a few years ago ( i think around 1994/1995) I had a tape
with a mix cd from Kirk Degeorgio on it, with tracks from Herbie Hancock
f.i..


I lost this tape and don't know the title anymore, can anybody help me with
this?


Remco



#
Note:

Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent
those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically stated.
This email
and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for the use
of the
individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this
email in
error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thank You.

#



#
Note:

Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent
those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically stated.
This email
and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for the use
of the
individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this
email in
error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thank You.

#



RE: (313) Fw: Dex and FX with Kirk Degiorgio

2003-05-23 Thread Robert Taylor
Doh!
Anyway - it was worth posting twice cos that listing is phenomenal!
That Jedi Nights track is beautiful

-Original Message-
From: ::) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2003 11:13 AM
To: Robert Taylor; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) Fw: Dex and FX with Kirk Degiorgio


because you sent it to yourself and the list :)

- Original Message - 
From: Robert Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Robert Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2003 8:03 AM
Subject: RE: (313) Fw: Dex and FX with Kirk Degiorgio


Weird - this appeared in my box twice but I only sent it once.
Herbie Hancock's Nobu is on this - now that is techno!

-Original Message-
From: Robert Taylor
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2003 12:02 PM
To: Robert Taylor; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: (313) Fw: Dex and FX with Kirk Degiorgio


Here is the tracklisting:
1 T'Raenon (Version) Photek Photek 00:07:17

2 Air Bag Local Zero

3 Solina Jedi Knights  00:11:04

4 Utopia Planetia Stasis  00:08:28

5 Las Palmas Joe Henderson  00:00:27

6 Prologue / Love, Love Julian Priester / Pepo Mtoto  00:19:12

7 Veil Blue Binary

8 Id Clones Shake  00:09:26

9 Vortex Sean Deason  00:06:55

10 Meditative Fusion Silent Phase  00:06:07

11 Nuron Neau Rouge

12 Microlovr 69  00:08:02

13 Attention Please 4th Wave  00:07:59

14 Flights of Fantasy Elegy  00:08:02

15 Terra Firma Joe Henderson

16 Inner Space Bobby Lyle

17 Non-Stop Home Weather Report  00:03:52

18 Epic As One  00:12:59

19 Nobu Herbie Hancock  00:07:39

20 Olivine The Black Dog  00:06:14

21 The Third Ear Ballet Mechanique

22 Everlast Phenomyna

23 Soon Repeat


-Original Message-
From: Robert Taylor
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2003 11:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: (313) Fw: Dex and FX with Kirk Degiorgio


It was called Check One and, IMNSHO is absolutely stunning in the way it
mixes jazz with techno - you can appreciate the comparisons after hearing
that!

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2003 10:50 AM
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: (313) Fw: Dex and FX with Kirk Degiorgio



Another question, a few years ago ( i think around 1994/1995) I had a tape
with a mix cd from Kirk Degeorgio on it, with tracks from Herbie Hancock
f.i..


I lost this tape and don't know the title anymore, can anybody help me with
this?


Remco



#
Note:

Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent
those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically stated.
This email
and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for the use
of the
individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this
email in
error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thank You.

#



#
Note:

Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent
those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically stated.
This email
and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for the use
of the
individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this
email in
error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thank You.

#

#
Note:

Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent 
those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically stated. This 
email 
and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the 
individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this 
email in 
error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thank You.
#



RE: (313) Fw: Dex and FX with Kirk Degiorgio

2003-05-23 Thread alex . bond

Robin
i see there's another article in Jockey Slut this month saying that mixing
records together is an out of date approach. i beg to differ.

I beg to differ too. Of course the advent of Final Scratch and Ableton Live
is exciting, but for f**ks sake.
More than 75% of the punters in the club don't even know the tracks anyway,
so why do they give a s**t about some mad version of a track that they
don't even know the original of. If mixing together two records is out of
date, then f**k me, lets all pack in playing music altogether in night
clubs.

I couldn't give two hoots about the quality of anybodys mixing - as long as
its obviously not train wrecks all the way. Just simple selection that
flows well is fine for me. Anyone care to tell me David Mancuso isn't a dj?

IT'S ALL IN THE SELECTION FOLKS.

Listen to Derrick May's quotes in the recent technotourist article. Ron
Hardy wasn't a dj, he was some kind of musical shaman

f**king amen to that I say. (not that I ever saw him, ha ha ha)

OK, what I'm trying to say in a round-a-bout sort of way, is that Joe
Bloggs could be the best technical dj in the world - or the surgeon for
example, but if anyone is just going to play 3 hrs of nonsense just because
they find it hard to mix anything else (or that it might make their mixing
sound 'bad'), it just doesn't interest me in the slightest. It also
explains why the vast majority of clubs and parties are boring as f**k, and
why kids don't want to go out anymore. If you listen to all those Hardy
tapes, you can almost feel the vibe *even on the tape* - they're just
electric - there's no other word for them. Its the way he played the
tracks, and what he did with the tracks that create the vibe, not the
mixing. Theo Parrish is the same, although it's fairly obvious where his
style comes from (although he has his own slant).

Rant Over. and I really hope Tom Magic feet didn't write that quote from
Jockey Slut, otherwise I'm going to feel a right tit.

Alex.

Alex

_

- End of message text 

This e-mail is sent by the above named in their
individual, non-business capacity and is not on
behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers.

PricewaterhouseCoopers may monitor outgoing and incoming
e-mails and other telecommunications on its e-mail and
telecommunications systems. By replying to this e-mail you
give your consent to such monitoring





Re: (313) Fw: Dex and FX with Kirk Degiorgio

2003-05-23 Thread Stuart Thompson
i'll be seeing Surgeon tomorrow night at house of god, birmingham. hopefully 
it'll be a final scratch set.
If i'm in a fit state i'll post some feedback but the highlight will be 
seeing Scion arrange and process tomorrow, I am seriously looking forward to 
this :-)


Stuart




Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 11:53:52 +
To: Odeluga, Ken [EMAIL PROTECTED],
313 Hyperreal. Org 313@hyperreal.org
From: Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: (313) Fw: Dex and FX with Kirk Degiorgio
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Surgeon played at Tfunkshun a couple of weeks ago, and I know Scott is on
this list, any chance of a report Scott?


_
Hotmail messages direct to your mobile phone http://www.msn.co.uk/msnmobile



RE: (313) Fw: Dex and FX with Kirk Degiorgio

2003-05-23 Thread Robert Taylor
Scion - dribble!

-Original Message-
From: Stuart Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2003 11:38 AM
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) Fw: Dex and FX with Kirk Degiorgio


i'll be seeing Surgeon tomorrow night at house of god, birmingham. hopefully 
it'll be a final scratch set.
If i'm in a fit state i'll post some feedback but the highlight will be 
seeing Scion arrange and process tomorrow, I am seriously looking forward to 
this :-)

Stuart



Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 11:53:52 +
To: Odeluga, Ken [EMAIL PROTECTED],
   313 Hyperreal. Org 313@hyperreal.org
From: Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: (313) Fw: Dex and FX with Kirk Degiorgio
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Surgeon played at Tfunkshun a couple of weeks ago, and I know Scott is on
this list, any chance of a report Scott?

_
Hotmail messages direct to your mobile phone http://www.msn.co.uk/msnmobile

#
Note:

Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent 
those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically stated. This 
email 
and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the 
individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this 
email in 
error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thank You.
#



Re: (313) Fw: Dex and FX with Kirk Degiorgio

2003-05-23 Thread Martin

 
 i see there's another article in Jockey Slut this month saying that mixing
 records together is an out of date approach. i beg to differ.

I know a couple of DJ's who don't mix and I find it OK actually. Take The
Pho-KU Sound System for example, Ian doesn't mix but his programming is
brilliant and makes for an interesting night.

JS are just having a pop for the sake of it :)

Martin



RE: (313) Fw: Dex and FX with Kirk Degiorgio

2003-05-23 Thread robin pinning

we have two extremes here. looped bangers all night, same tempo, boring as
hell. and then we have the approach where selection rules and there is a
lot more variety and mixing is secondary...(if there is just one or the
other i prefer the second, simply because this approach allows a dj to
read the floor and respond with a moodron hardy/shaman style)

what i'm saying is there is now a middle way between the two where the dj
plays a hugely varied selection with a brilliantly mixed flow...(imagine
this: genuinely a dj that can pull the bassline out of one track and lay
the highs and mids over the top of it all live in response to what
the crowd go metal over...)

to illustrate my point will mean me finally getting off me arse, smoking
less and recording all the ideas i have in me head :) (if i can, heh)


robin...


 Robin
 i see there's another article in Jockey Slut this month saying that mixing
 records together is an out of date approach. i beg to differ.

 I beg to differ too. Of course the advent of Final Scratch and Ableton Live
 is exciting, but for f**ks sake.
 More than 75% of the punters in the club don't even know the tracks anyway,
 so why do they give a s**t about some mad version of a track that they
 don't even know the original of. If mixing together two records is out of
 date, then f**k me, lets all pack in playing music altogether in night
 clubs.

 I couldn't give two hoots about the quality of anybodys mixing - as long as
 its obviously not train wrecks all the way. Just simple selection that
 flows well is fine for me. Anyone care to tell me David Mancuso isn't a dj?

 IT'S ALL IN THE SELECTION FOLKS.

 Listen to Derrick May's quotes in the recent technotourist article. Ron
 Hardy wasn't a dj, he was some kind of musical shaman

 f**king amen to that I say. (not that I ever saw him, ha ha ha)

 OK, what I'm trying to say in a round-a-bout sort of way, is that Joe
 Bloggs could be the best technical dj in the world - or the surgeon for
 example, but if anyone is just going to play 3 hrs of nonsense just because
 they find it hard to mix anything else (or that it might make their mixing
 sound 'bad'), it just doesn't interest me in the slightest. It also
 explains why the vast majority of clubs and parties are boring as f**k, and
 why kids don't want to go out anymore. If you listen to all those Hardy
 tapes, you can almost feel the vibe *even on the tape* - they're just
 electric - there's no other word for them. Its the way he played the
 tracks, and what he did with the tracks that create the vibe, not the
 mixing. Theo Parrish is the same, although it's fairly obvious where his
 style comes from (although he has his own slant).

 Rant Over. and I really hope Tom Magic feet didn't write that quote from
 Jockey Slut, otherwise I'm going to feel a right tit.




RE: (313) Fw: Dex and FX with Kirk Degiorgio

2003-05-23 Thread Brendan Nelson
I would agree that traditional DJs listening to mixes done in things
like Ableton will try to copy some of the techniques they hear, and that
this will also help the traditional form of mixing to progress and
absorb new ideas. For example, the first time I heard proper booty music
was back in 1996 when I got a tape from 12 Tech Mob - the tape had been
recorded using multitracking and various other tricks, but at the time I
didn't know - I thought it was a straight mix.

So off I went, spending the next few years gathering booty and
ghetto-tech records and attempting to emulate the frenetic multi-layered
action you get on the mix tape. When I eventually found out that the mix
was not recorded live, of course, I realised I'd been wasting my time,
but in the process of trying to do the whole thing live I'd learnt a
whole bunch of new tricks and had generally upped the standard of my
mixing, which was a good thing. And did it make me value the tape any
less? No! It was just as enjoyable a listening experience, whether it
had been put together by NASA or by a demented child with sticky tape.

I definitely don't think straight-turntable mixing is dead, and won't be
for a long time. And when I say long time, I'm speaking in
generational terms, not the next few years. Even if the future sees us
all with ableton/final scratch and so on within about a five years, the
fact of the matter will remain that if your basic track selection skills
are lacking then you won't do very well.

Brendan

 -Original Message-
 From: robin pinning [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 23 May 2003 12:05
 To: Brendan Nelson
 Cc: 313@hyperreal.org
 Subject: RE: (313) Fw: Dex and FX with Kirk Degiorgio
 
 
 
 i agree with brendans post below. the software approach only becomes
 invalid when the mix is presented in a trad 2x1200 and a 
 mixer way (like a
 lot of these main stream protooled juke-box style mixes)
 
 i was listening to the megamix on the techno 1 - the new dance sound
 compilation the other day and noticed (over)use of the spin 
 back which i
 guess made a lot of people see that this could be used when 
 mixing in a live (not
 megamix) setting.
 
 so when a dj hears some interesting approach done in software 
 is he/she
 more likely to try and reproduce this sort of this on decks?
 
 i think he/she is, so i'm quite excited by all this. it's 
 amazing what can
 be done with a simple sampler, decent eqs and a delay live...this all
 bodes well for the future of djing (as does the use of FS, so 
 adding your
 own edits into the mix).
 
 i see there's another article in Jockey Slut this month 
 saying that mixing
 records together is an out of date approach. i beg to differ.
 
 
 robin...


RE: (313) Fw: Dex and FX with Kirk Degiorgio

2003-05-23 Thread Langsman, Marc

Similarly when I first listened to the derrick may mayday mix I thought it
was live but soon found out it wasn't - as it happens tho I can pull off
quite a few of those tricks live now and Ive always kinda strived to push
the live mixing thing a far as I can.

Peace-out
Marc

 -Original Message-
 From: Brendan Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Friday, May 23, 2003 2:27 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: 313@hyperreal.org
 Subject: RE: (313) Fw: Dex and FX with Kirk Degiorgio
 
 
 I would agree that traditional DJs listening to mixes done 
 in things like Ableton will try to copy some of the 
 techniques they hear, and that this will also help the 
 traditional form of mixing to progress and absorb new ideas. 
 For example, the first time I heard proper booty music was 
 back in 1996 when I got a tape from 12 Tech Mob - the tape 
 had been recorded using multitracking and various other 
 tricks, but at the time I didn't know - I thought it was a 
 straight mix.
 
 So off I went, spending the next few years gathering booty 
 and ghetto-tech records and attempting to emulate the 
 frenetic multi-layered action you get on the mix tape. When I 
 eventually found out that the mix was not recorded live, of 
 course, I realised I'd been wasting my time, but in the 
 process of trying to do the whole thing live I'd learnt a 
 whole bunch of new tricks and had generally upped the 
 standard of my mixing, which was a good thing. And did it 
 make me value the tape any less? No! It was just as enjoyable 
 a listening experience, whether it had been put together by 
 NASA or by a demented child with sticky tape.
 
 I definitely don't think straight-turntable mixing is dead, 
 and won't be for a long time. And when I say long time, I'm 
 speaking in generational terms, not the next few years. 
 Even if the future sees us all with ableton/final scratch and 
 so on within about a five years, the fact of the matter will 
 remain that if your basic track selection skills are lacking 
 then you won't do very well.
 
 Brendan
 
  -Original Message-
  From: robin pinning [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: 23 May 2003 12:05
  To: Brendan Nelson
  Cc: 313@hyperreal.org
  Subject: RE: (313) Fw: Dex and FX with Kirk Degiorgio
  
  
  
  i agree with brendans post below. the software approach 
 only becomes 
  invalid when the mix is presented in a trad 2x1200 and a mixer way 
  (like a lot of these main stream protooled juke-box style mixes)
  
  i was listening to the megamix on the techno 1 - the new 
 dance sound 
  compilation the other day and noticed (over)use of the spin 
 back which 
  i guess made a lot of people see that this could be used when
  mixing in a live (not
  megamix) setting.
  
  so when a dj hears some interesting approach done in software
  is he/she
  more likely to try and reproduce this sort of this on decks?
  
  i think he/she is, so i'm quite excited by all this. it's
  amazing what can
  be done with a simple sampler, decent eqs and a delay 
 live...this all
  bodes well for the future of djing (as does the use of FS, so 
  adding your
  own edits into the mix).
  
  i see there's another article in Jockey Slut this month
  saying that mixing
  records together is an out of date approach. i beg to differ.
  
  
  robin...
 

--
This message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the 
designated recipient(s) named above.  If you are not the intended recipient of 
this message you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited.  This 
communication is for information purposes only and should not be regarded as an 
offer to sell or as a solicitation of an offer to buy any financial product, an 
official confirmation of any transaction, or as an official statement of Lehman 
Brothers.  Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free.  
Therefore, we do not represent that this information is complete or accurate 
and it should not be relied upon as such.  All information is subject to change 
without notice.




RE: (313) Fw: Dex and FX with Kirk Degiorgio

2003-05-23 Thread robin pinning

yeah that's what i'm getting at. in fact track selection (brendan
mentions it at the end of the below post) is more important
to the hi-tech dj.

another thought:

from what i can gather the Rave Act in the US classifies a party with no
djs and just live acts as something other than a rave and the law is less
stringent (please correct if wrong). So is a DJ with a powerbook and
ableton live now a live act and not dj?

will this change things?

robin...


 I would agree that traditional DJs listening to mixes done in things
 like Ableton will try to copy some of the techniques they hear, and that
 this will also help the traditional form of mixing to progress and
 absorb new ideas. For example, the first time I heard proper booty music
 was back in 1996 when I got a tape from 12 Tech Mob - the tape had been
 recorded using multitracking and various other tricks, but at the time I
 didn't know - I thought it was a straight mix.

 So off I went, spending the next few years gathering booty and
 ghetto-tech records and attempting to emulate the frenetic multi-layered
 action you get on the mix tape. When I eventually found out that the mix
 was not recorded live, of course, I realised I'd been wasting my time,
 but in the process of trying to do the whole thing live I'd learnt a
 whole bunch of new tricks and had generally upped the standard of my
 mixing, which was a good thing. And did it make me value the tape any
 less? No! It was just as enjoyable a listening experience, whether it
 had been put together by NASA or by a demented child with sticky tape.

 I definitely don't think straight-turntable mixing is dead, and won't be
 for a long time. And when I say long time, I'm speaking in
 generational terms, not the next few years. Even if the future sees us
 all with ableton/final scratch and so on within about a five years, the
 fact of the matter will remain that if your basic track selection skills
 are lacking then you won't do very well.

 Brendan



RE: (313) Fw: Dex and FX with Kirk Degiorgio

2003-05-23 Thread Brendan Nelson
Yes, track selection is definitely more important - while the
traditional DJ might cock up track selection sometimes (by simply not
being able to find the right record in time, or having had to limit the
number of records brought to a gig for weight reasons), a high-tech DJ
has no excuse for picking the wrong track. 

And while a traditional DJ might argue that his/her crap track selection
is compensated for by their impeccable mixing (I myself wouldn't agree
with them, but there you go), a high-tech DJ can't really say the same.
So track selection is more crucial, if anything, to someone using
digital technology.

That's an interesting observation about the DJ/live set thing! I think
new legislation might have to come into place to differentiate between
the two - at what point does asemblage become composition? When Jeff
Mills hooks up a TR-909 to his mixer, does he become a live PA or is he
still technically a DJ? It'll be interesting to see how the law manages
to cope with this... what is the current legal distinction between a DJ
and a live act under US law?

Brendan

 -Original Message-
 From: robin pinning [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 23 May 2003 14:53
 To: 313@hyperreal.org
 Subject: RE: (313) Fw: Dex and FX with Kirk Degiorgio
 
 
 
 yeah that's what i'm getting at. in fact track selection (brendan
 mentions it at the end of the below post) is more important
 to the hi-tech dj.
 
 another thought:
 
 from what i can gather the Rave Act in the US classifies a 
 party with no
 djs and just live acts as something other than a rave and the 
 law is less
 stringent (please correct if wrong). So is a DJ with a powerbook and
 ableton live now a live act and not dj?
 
 will this change things?
 
 robin...
 
 
  I would agree that traditional DJs listening to mixes 
 done in things
  like Ableton will try to copy some of the techniques they 
 hear, and that
  this will also help the traditional form of mixing to progress and
  absorb new ideas. For example, the first time I heard 
 proper booty music
  was back in 1996 when I got a tape from 12 Tech Mob - the 
 tape had been
  recorded using multitracking and various other tricks, but 
 at the time I
  didn't know - I thought it was a straight mix.
 
  So off I went, spending the next few years gathering booty and
  ghetto-tech records and attempting to emulate the frenetic 
 multi-layered
  action you get on the mix tape. When I eventually found out 
 that the mix
  was not recorded live, of course, I realised I'd been 
 wasting my time,
  but in the process of trying to do the whole thing live I'd learnt a
  whole bunch of new tricks and had generally upped the standard of my
  mixing, which was a good thing. And did it make me value 
 the tape any
  less? No! It was just as enjoyable a listening experience, 
 whether it
  had been put together by NASA or by a demented child with 
 sticky tape.
 
  I definitely don't think straight-turntable mixing is dead, 
 and won't be
  for a long time. And when I say long time, I'm speaking in
  generational terms, not the next few years. Even if the 
 future sees us
  all with ableton/final scratch and so on within about a 
 five years, the
  fact of the matter will remain that if your basic track 
 selection skills
  are lacking then you won't do very well.
 
  Brendan
 
 


(313) Third Wave DJ was RE: (313) Fw: Dex and FX with Kirk Degiorgio

2003-05-23 Thread robin pinning

another point:

the hi-tech dj (third wave dj?, have i been reading too much? :)) has
to approach selection in a similar way to a ghetto-tech dj. using two
copies to do your own edit/effects, using just small snippets of some
tracks juggled over the top of a beat track to create a new one, that kind
of thing. and of course a lot of recorded ghetto-tech mixes are done
hotmix style.

i've just realised i'm wittering on too much and a lot of the US people
are prepping to go to Movement. Lucky B**s! :)

i'll shut up now

robin...





(313) RE: Third Wave DJ was RE: (313) Fw: Dex and FX with Kirk Degiorgio

2003-05-23 Thread Brendan Nelson
I like the term third wave dj actually! :)

Lots of recorded ghetto-tech mixes are done in hotmix style, that's
true, but it kind of remains that the ghetto-tech scene is probably the
most hostile to new techniques and methods for DJing. You can just
imagine the chorus of disapproval on the ghettotech.de forum if, god
forbid, Godfather was spotted with a laptop hidden behind the decks! But
at the same time the overwhelming majority of ghetto-tech mixes are made
digitally.

When you are doing a high-tech mix, though, you do have to think like a
ghetto-tech DJ - what noise can I put in *right here* that will make
this a bit better? What can I personally do to keep the listener
interested during this rather boring bridge part of a track? Should I
just let this whole track play out, or shall I whip out a second copy
and cut straight to the good bit at the end? 

That sort of thing needs to be going through your head all the time if
you're using digital technology, I would say. If you find yourself just
sitting there with mouse hovering over track title for five minutes,
waiting for the tune to play out, you're not really getting into the
spirit of things...

This thread is a bit on the waffly side, but f*ck it; with everyone
going to Movement this weekend, the list would just die on its feet if
there weren't a few us prepared to step into the breach and start
talking bo**ocks!

Brendan

 -Original Message-
 From: robin pinning [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 23 May 2003 15:33
 To: Brendan Nelson
 Cc: 313@hyperreal.org
 Subject: Third Wave DJ was RE: (313) Fw: Dex and FX with Kirk 
 Degiorgio
 
 
 
 another point:
 
 the hi-tech dj (third wave dj?, have i been reading too 
 much? :)) has
 to approach selection in a similar way to a ghetto-tech dj. using two
 copies to do your own edit/effects, using just small snippets of some
 tracks juggled over the top of a beat track to create a new 
 one, that kind
 of thing. and of course a lot of recorded ghetto-tech mixes are done
 hotmix style.
 
 i've just realised i'm wittering on too much and a lot of the 
 US people
 are prepping to go to Movement. Lucky B**s! :)
 
 i'll shut up now
 
 robin...
 
 
 
 


Re: (313) Third Wave DJ was RE: (313) Fw: Dex and FX with Kirk Degiorgio

2003-05-23 Thread alex . bond

a lot of the US people
are prepping to go to Movement

Oh, Movement.

Cor - looks rubbish that.
ESG, Amp Fiddler, Theo Parrish, MM, Juan? load of rubbish

You wanna come down my pub in Salford, thats where its at this weekend.
Sometimes they play the Smiths on a saturday night and everything.

Alex

*who is gutted*
_

- End of message text 

This e-mail is sent by the above named in their
individual, non-business capacity and is not on
behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers.

PricewaterhouseCoopers may monitor outgoing and incoming
e-mails and other telecommunications on its e-mail and
telecommunications systems. By replying to this e-mail you
give your consent to such monitoring