Re: [AFMUG] Refurb UPS dealers?

2016-04-04 Thread George Skorup
I've had two of these running in the NOC for about two years. TRIPP LITE 
SMART3000RMXL2U. Just using the internal batteries. They have a blue 
(48v) external connector too. Not even on-line/dual-conversion. The AVR 
seems to handle our crappy utility power just fine. Sensitivity set to 
medium for our generator also works fine. I think we got them on promo 
w/ management card from Provantage for like $900 at the time. Can't say 
there's anything I really hate about them, other than one management 
card came with the newer firmware that has the stupid java web GUI and 
all of the SNMP data of interest returns *1000 (40% load shows 400, 
etc), just an annoyance though. I can probably downgrade that one, but 
that's like # 176 on my list of shit.


On 4/5/2016 12:01 AM, Jason Wilson wrote:

A few guys swear by these
APS750  Tripp Lite  $282Provantage


​The drawback is no snmp monitoring, but that could be overcome. You 
add the battery combination to suit your environment 12vdc bank.


Jason​



Jason Wilson
Remotely Located
Providing High Speed Internet to out of the way places.
530-651-1736
530-748-9608 Cell
www.remotelylocated.com 

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 8:21 PM, Lewis Bergman > wrote:


I don't know about other's experience but tripplite seems to make
a better product across the board.


On Mon, Apr 4, 2016, 9:53 PM Eric Kuhnke > wrote:

Yeah. At scale it is necessary to be able to buy the same
model (or very close) for consistent deployment and
maintenance. Same battery trays, same batteries, same
management interface. That is why I'm specifically only
looking at Tripplite and APC.

After doing some more research it appears there are at least a
half dozen reputable vendors. As more enterprise type
customers move their server stuff to the cloud (err, butt?) a
lot of used UPS end up going to electronics recycling places.

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 7:14 PM, Lewis Bergman
> wrote:

Of course i am not a dealer but i have an unused 2U Eaton.
I think it is 1500 but i would have to check. Sounds like
you need more than one.


On Mon, Apr 4, 2016, 8:24 PM Jason Wilson
> wrote:

Try this guy on Ebay from Carson City Nevada.  I have
done buisness with him before.

http://www.ebay.com/sch/m.html?_sop=10&_ssn=uspowerups&_pgn=2&_skc=50=nc

Jason



Jason Wilson
Remotely Located
Providing High Speed Internet to out of the way places.
530-651-1736 
530-748-9608  Cell
www.remotelylocated.com 


On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 6:00 PM, Eric Kuhnke
>
wrote:

Because I don't want to buy a bunch of cheap and
used, for example SUA1500RM2U UPS, and discover
their charge controller or inverter are messed up.
Or it's had a battery swell and leak all over insides.

something like this, plus $25 100BaseTX IP
management card:


http://www.ebay.com/itm/APC-SUA1500RM2U-SMART-UPS-1500VA-980W-120V-USB-RACKMOUNT-BACKUP-NEW-BATTERIES-/291583017738?hash=item43e3b3c30a:g:tEsAAOSwoydWnp79



On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 5:57 PM,
can...@believewireless.net

> wrote:

Why not buy the batteries on your own?








Re: [AFMUG] Refurb UPS dealers?

2016-04-04 Thread Jason Wilson
A few guys swear by these
APS750 Tripp Lite $282 Provantage
​The drawback is no snmp monitoring, but that could be overcome.  You add
the battery combination to suit your environment 12vdc bank.

Jason​



Jason Wilson
Remotely Located
Providing High Speed Internet to out of the way places.
530-651-1736
530-748-9608 Cell
www.remotelylocated.com

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 8:21 PM, Lewis Bergman 
wrote:

> I don't know about other's experience but tripplite seems to make a better
> product across the board.
>
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016, 9:53 PM Eric Kuhnke  wrote:
>
>> Yeah. At scale it is necessary to be able to buy the same model (or very
>> close) for consistent deployment and maintenance. Same battery trays, same
>> batteries, same management interface. That is why I'm specifically only
>> looking at Tripplite and APC.
>>
>> After doing some more research it appears there are at least a half dozen
>> reputable vendors. As more enterprise type customers move their server
>> stuff to the cloud (err, butt?) a lot of used UPS end up going to
>> electronics recycling places.
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 7:14 PM, Lewis Bergman 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Of course i am not a dealer but i have an unused 2U Eaton. I think it is
>>> 1500 but i would have to check. Sounds like you need more than one.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016, 8:24 PM Jason Wilson 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>> Try this guy on Ebay from Carson City Nevada.  I have done buisness with
 him before.
 http://www.ebay.com/sch/m.html?_sop=10&_ssn=uspowerups&_pgn=2&_skc=50=nc

 Jason

>>>

 Jason Wilson
 Remotely Located
 Providing High Speed Internet to out of the way places.
 530-651-1736
 530-748-9608 Cell
 www.remotelylocated.com

>>>
 On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 6:00 PM, Eric Kuhnke 
 wrote:

> Because I don't want to buy a bunch of cheap and used, for example
> SUA1500RM2U UPS, and discover their charge controller or inverter are
> messed up. Or it's had a battery swell and leak all over insides.
>
> something like this, plus $25 100BaseTX IP management card:
>
>
> http://www.ebay.com/itm/APC-SUA1500RM2U-SMART-UPS-1500VA-980W-120V-USB-RACKMOUNT-BACKUP-NEW-BATTERIES-/291583017738?hash=item43e3b3c30a:g:tEsAAOSwoydWnp79
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 5:57 PM, can...@believewireless.net <
> p...@believewireless.net> wrote:
>
>> Why not buy the batteries on your own?
>>
>
>



Re: [AFMUG] Refurb UPS dealers?

2016-04-04 Thread Lewis Bergman
I don't know about other's experience but tripplite seems to make a better
product across the board.

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016, 9:53 PM Eric Kuhnke  wrote:

> Yeah. At scale it is necessary to be able to buy the same model (or very
> close) for consistent deployment and maintenance. Same battery trays, same
> batteries, same management interface. That is why I'm specifically only
> looking at Tripplite and APC.
>
> After doing some more research it appears there are at least a half dozen
> reputable vendors. As more enterprise type customers move their server
> stuff to the cloud (err, butt?) a lot of used UPS end up going to
> electronics recycling places.
>
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 7:14 PM, Lewis Bergman 
> wrote:
>
>> Of course i am not a dealer but i have an unused 2U Eaton. I think it is
>> 1500 but i would have to check. Sounds like you need more than one.
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016, 8:24 PM Jason Wilson 
>> wrote:
>>
> Try this guy on Ebay from Carson City Nevada.  I have done buisness with
>>> him before.
>>> http://www.ebay.com/sch/m.html?_sop=10&_ssn=uspowerups&_pgn=2&_skc=50=nc
>>>
>>> Jason
>>>
>>
>>>
>>> Jason Wilson
>>> Remotely Located
>>> Providing High Speed Internet to out of the way places.
>>> 530-651-1736
>>> 530-748-9608 Cell
>>> www.remotelylocated.com
>>>
>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 6:00 PM, Eric Kuhnke 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Because I don't want to buy a bunch of cheap and used, for example
 SUA1500RM2U UPS, and discover their charge controller or inverter are
 messed up. Or it's had a battery swell and leak all over insides.

 something like this, plus $25 100BaseTX IP management card:


 http://www.ebay.com/itm/APC-SUA1500RM2U-SMART-UPS-1500VA-980W-120V-USB-RACKMOUNT-BACKUP-NEW-BATTERIES-/291583017738?hash=item43e3b3c30a:g:tEsAAOSwoydWnp79



 On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 5:57 PM, can...@believewireless.net <
 p...@believewireless.net> wrote:

> Why not buy the batteries on your own?
>


>>>


Re: [AFMUG] Refurb UPS dealers?

2016-04-04 Thread Eric Kuhnke
Yeah. At scale it is necessary to be able to buy the same model (or very
close) for consistent deployment and maintenance. Same battery trays, same
batteries, same management interface. That is why I'm specifically only
looking at Tripplite and APC.

After doing some more research it appears there are at least a half dozen
reputable vendors. As more enterprise type customers move their server
stuff to the cloud (err, butt?) a lot of used UPS end up going to
electronics recycling places.

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 7:14 PM, Lewis Bergman 
wrote:

> Of course i am not a dealer but i have an unused 2U Eaton. I think it is
> 1500 but i would have to check. Sounds like you need more than one.
>
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016, 8:24 PM Jason Wilson 
> wrote:
>
>> Try this guy on Ebay from Carson City Nevada.  I have done buisness with
>> him before.
>> http://www.ebay.com/sch/m.html?_sop=10&_ssn=uspowerups&_pgn=2&_skc=50=nc
>>
>> Jason
>>
>>
>> Jason Wilson
>> Remotely Located
>> Providing High Speed Internet to out of the way places.
>> 530-651-1736
>> 530-748-9608 Cell
>> www.remotelylocated.com
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 6:00 PM, Eric Kuhnke 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Because I don't want to buy a bunch of cheap and used, for example
>>> SUA1500RM2U UPS, and discover their charge controller or inverter are
>>> messed up. Or it's had a battery swell and leak all over insides.
>>>
>>> something like this, plus $25 100BaseTX IP management card:
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.ebay.com/itm/APC-SUA1500RM2U-SMART-UPS-1500VA-980W-120V-USB-RACKMOUNT-BACKUP-NEW-BATTERIES-/291583017738?hash=item43e3b3c30a:g:tEsAAOSwoydWnp79
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 5:57 PM, can...@believewireless.net <
>>> p...@believewireless.net> wrote:
>>>
 Why not buy the batteries on your own?

>>>
>>>
>>


Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

2016-04-04 Thread Eric Kuhnke
Try aiming a 500 meter 60 GHz link and then aim a 3km 80 GHz link

It most certainly does affect ease of aiming for new hires/new technicians
when dealing with things way less than 1 degree wide in the sweet spot of
best RSL.

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 7:21 PM, Josh Luthman 
wrote:

> But the distance of a link makes no difference in terms of aiming...
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
> On Apr 4, 2016 9:47 PM, "Harold Bledsoe"  wrote:
>
>> It makes fine tuning longer links easier.
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016, 9:06 PM Josh Luthman 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Why would the distance matter?
>>>
>>>
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 8:41 PM, Harold Bledsoe 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 The standard mount is being improved a bit (same cost) as well as an
 optional LR upgraded mount for longer distances.

 Thanks,
 -Hal

 On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 7:49 PM Josh Reynolds 
 wrote:

>>> I thought they were releasing a 2nd gen mount?
> On Apr 4, 2016 6:35 PM, "Ken Hohhof"  wrote:
>
>> Wasn’t there a post from them saying for a few bucks more there is a
>> better mount?
>>
>>
>
>> *From:* Cassidy B. Larson 
>> *Sent:* Monday, April 04, 2016 6:18 PM
>>
> *To:* af@afmug.com
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
>>
> FWIW on these IgniteNet 60GHz, the mounts are horrendous. We got a
>> couple of pairs and my installers are saying they’re worse than a nano
>> bridge mount.. For the stability one would need to keep these locked on
>> during a breeze, we were expecting a much heavier duty mount.
>>
>>
> Chuck, another product idea for ya :)
>>
>> -c
>>
> On Apr 4, 2016, at 4:40 PM, Ken Hohhof  wrote:
>>
>>
>> I thought that was Trump’s plan to eliminate the national debt in 8
>> years!
>>
>> Or a new reality TV show:  Naked and Unshod.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Faisal Imtiaz 
>> *Sent:* Monday, April 04, 2016 5:31 PM
>>
>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
>>
>> I often tell my wife
>>
>>
>> If the women of the world stopped buying shoes and clothes for 3
>> months, there will be a total world wide economic collapse !
>>
>>
>>
>> :)
>>
>> Faisal Imtiaz
>> Snappy Internet & Telecom
>> 7266 SW 48 Street
>> Miami, FL 33155
>> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
>>
>> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
>> 
>>
>> --
>>
>> *From: *"Jaime Solorza" 
>> *To: *"Animal Farm" 
>> *Sent: *Monday, April 4, 2016 3:58:01 PM
>>
>>
>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
>>
>> Ha
>>
>> On Apr 4, 2016 1:53 PM, "Chuck McCown"  wrote:
>>
>> I told my wife this morning that I am going to have to find a rehab
>>> center for an Amazon addict.
>>>
>> *From:* Jaime Solorza 
>>> *Sent:* Monday, April 04, 2016 1:47 PM
>>> *To:* Animal Farm 
>>>
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
>>>
>> My wife always complains that I don't need more tools   I respond...
>>> when you stop buying shoes, I will stop buying tools...she gives me the
>>> death stare.
>>>
>> On Apr 4, 2016 1:44 PM, "Faisal Imtiaz" 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>> Chuck, somehow you remind me of my business partner who goes
 looking for projects, cause they are a perfect opportunity to collect 
 (buy)
 more tools... one can never have enough tools !

 (He is more into power tools, construction, mechanical etc ...)


>>> :)

 Faisal Imtiaz
 Snappy Internet & Telecom
 7266 SW 48 Street
 Miami, FL 33155
 Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 <305%20663%205518%20x%20232>

 Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email:
 supp...@snappytelecom.net 

 --

>>> *From: *"Chuck McCown" 
 *To: *af@afmug.com
 *Sent: *Monday, April 4, 2016 3:36:59 PM


 *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

 I just tested a cable tester from Ideal that qualifies GigE
 circuits.

Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

2016-04-04 Thread Josh Luthman
But the distance of a link makes no difference in terms of aiming...

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Apr 4, 2016 9:47 PM, "Harold Bledsoe"  wrote:

> It makes fine tuning longer links easier.
>
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016, 9:06 PM Josh Luthman 
> wrote:
>
>> Why would the distance matter?
>>
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 8:41 PM, Harold Bledsoe 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> The standard mount is being improved a bit (same cost) as well as an
>>> optional LR upgraded mount for longer distances.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> -Hal
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 7:49 PM Josh Reynolds 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>> I thought they were releasing a 2nd gen mount?
 On Apr 4, 2016 6:35 PM, "Ken Hohhof"  wrote:

> Wasn’t there a post from them saying for a few bucks more there is a
> better mount?
>
>

> *From:* Cassidy B. Larson 
> *Sent:* Monday, April 04, 2016 6:18 PM
>
 *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
>
 FWIW on these IgniteNet 60GHz, the mounts are horrendous. We got a
> couple of pairs and my installers are saying they’re worse than a nano
> bridge mount.. For the stability one would need to keep these locked on
> during a breeze, we were expecting a much heavier duty mount.
>
>
 Chuck, another product idea for ya :)
>
> -c
>
 On Apr 4, 2016, at 4:40 PM, Ken Hohhof  wrote:
>
>
> I thought that was Trump’s plan to eliminate the national debt in 8
> years!
>
> Or a new reality TV show:  Naked and Unshod.
>
>
>
> *From:* Faisal Imtiaz 
> *Sent:* Monday, April 04, 2016 5:31 PM
>
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
>
> I often tell my wife
>
>
> If the women of the world stopped buying shoes and clothes for 3
> months, there will be a total world wide economic collapse !
>
>
>
> :)
>
> Faisal Imtiaz
> Snappy Internet & Telecom
> 7266 SW 48 Street
> Miami, FL 33155
> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
>
> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
> 
>
> --
>
> *From: *"Jaime Solorza" 
> *To: *"Animal Farm" 
> *Sent: *Monday, April 4, 2016 3:58:01 PM
>
>
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
>
> Ha
>
> On Apr 4, 2016 1:53 PM, "Chuck McCown"  wrote:
>
> I told my wife this morning that I am going to have to find a rehab
>> center for an Amazon addict.
>>
> *From:* Jaime Solorza 
>> *Sent:* Monday, April 04, 2016 1:47 PM
>> *To:* Animal Farm 
>>
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
>>
> My wife always complains that I don't need more tools   I respond...
>> when you stop buying shoes, I will stop buying tools...she gives me the
>> death stare.
>>
> On Apr 4, 2016 1:44 PM, "Faisal Imtiaz" 
>> wrote:
>>
> Chuck, somehow you remind me of my business partner who goes
>>> looking for projects, cause they are a perfect opportunity to collect 
>>> (buy)
>>> more tools... one can never have enough tools !
>>>
>>> (He is more into power tools, construction, mechanical etc ...)
>>>
>>>
>> :)
>>>
>>> Faisal Imtiaz
>>> Snappy Internet & Telecom
>>> 7266 SW 48 Street
>>> Miami, FL 33155
>>> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 <305%20663%205518%20x%20232>
>>>
>>> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email:
>>> supp...@snappytelecom.net 
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>> *From: *"Chuck McCown" 
>>> *To: *af@afmug.com
>>> *Sent: *Monday, April 4, 2016 3:36:59 PM
>>>
>>>
>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
>>>
>>> I just tested a cable tester from Ideal that qualifies GigE circuits.
>>>
>>>
>>> Nice thing is, it will do a data test without cable continuity.
>>> (It also does the actual cable continuity tests too).
>>>
>>> I wonder what it would show on a less than 1Gbps radio.  $1325
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Harold Bledsoe 
>>> *Sent:* Monday, April 04, 2016 1:32 PM
>>>
>>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
>>>
>>> Sorry to be late to the 

Re: [AFMUG] Drug Testing

2016-04-04 Thread Sean Heskett
Um we operate in Colorado *cough cough* I don't think anyone in the state
would pass that kind of test lol

-Sean


On Monday, April 4, 2016, Keefe John  wrote:

> Just curious who here drugs tests employees.
>
> Our insurance company is making us do a sweep on drivers.
>
> Keefe
>


Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

2016-04-04 Thread Harold Bledsoe
It makes fine tuning longer links easier.

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016, 9:06 PM Josh Luthman 
wrote:

> Why would the distance matter?
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 8:41 PM, Harold Bledsoe 
> wrote:
>
>> The standard mount is being improved a bit (same cost) as well as an
>> optional LR upgraded mount for longer distances.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Hal
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 7:49 PM Josh Reynolds 
>> wrote:
>>
> I thought they were releasing a 2nd gen mount?
>>> On Apr 4, 2016 6:35 PM, "Ken Hohhof"  wrote:
>>>
 Wasn’t there a post from them saying for a few bucks more there is a
 better mount?


>>>
 *From:* Cassidy B. Larson 
 *Sent:* Monday, April 04, 2016 6:18 PM

>>> *To:* af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

>>> FWIW on these IgniteNet 60GHz, the mounts are horrendous. We got a
 couple of pairs and my installers are saying they’re worse than a nano
 bridge mount.. For the stability one would need to keep these locked on
 during a breeze, we were expecting a much heavier duty mount.


>>> Chuck, another product idea for ya :)

 -c

>>> On Apr 4, 2016, at 4:40 PM, Ken Hohhof  wrote:


 I thought that was Trump’s plan to eliminate the national debt in 8
 years!

 Or a new reality TV show:  Naked and Unshod.



 *From:* Faisal Imtiaz 
 *Sent:* Monday, April 04, 2016 5:31 PM

 *To:* af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

 I often tell my wife


 If the women of the world stopped buying shoes and clothes for 3
 months, there will be a total world wide economic collapse !



 :)

 Faisal Imtiaz
 Snappy Internet & Telecom
 7266 SW 48 Street
 Miami, FL 33155
 Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

 Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
 

 --

 *From: *"Jaime Solorza" 
 *To: *"Animal Farm" 
 *Sent: *Monday, April 4, 2016 3:58:01 PM


 *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

 Ha

 On Apr 4, 2016 1:53 PM, "Chuck McCown"  wrote:

 I told my wife this morning that I am going to have to find a rehab
> center for an Amazon addict.
>
 *From:* Jaime Solorza 
> *Sent:* Monday, April 04, 2016 1:47 PM
> *To:* Animal Farm 
>
 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
>
 My wife always complains that I don't need more tools   I respond...
> when you stop buying shoes, I will stop buying tools...she gives me the
> death stare.
>
 On Apr 4, 2016 1:44 PM, "Faisal Imtiaz" 
> wrote:
>
 Chuck, somehow you remind me of my business partner who goes
>> looking for projects, cause they are a perfect opportunity to collect 
>> (buy)
>> more tools... one can never have enough tools !
>>
>> (He is more into power tools, construction, mechanical etc ...)
>>
>>
> :)
>>
>> Faisal Imtiaz
>> Snappy Internet & Telecom
>> 7266 SW 48 Street
>> Miami, FL 33155
>> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 <305%20663%205518%20x%20232>
>>
>> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
>> 
>>
>> --
>>
> *From: *"Chuck McCown" 
>> *To: *af@afmug.com
>> *Sent: *Monday, April 4, 2016 3:36:59 PM
>>
>>
>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
>>
>> I just tested a cable tester from Ideal that qualifies GigE circuits.
>>
>>
>> Nice thing is, it will do a data test without cable continuity.
>> (It also does the actual cable continuity tests too).
>>
>> I wonder what it would show on a less than 1Gbps radio.  $1325
>>
>>
>> *From:* Harold Bledsoe 
>> *Sent:* Monday, April 04, 2016 1:32 PM
>>
>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
>>
>> Sorry to be late to the party.  ;-)
>>
>> I have a few comments on iperf though.  Iperf2 is not very reliable
>> at high speeds.  For high speeds, iperf3 tends to do a little better
>> assuming you have enough computer to push the required speeds.  However
>> iperf3 cannot yet do bi-di tests.
>>
>> For affordable testing, we've found Mikrotik's traffic generator to
>> be pretty good.  It's a 

[AFMUG] Kodi / http media streams

2016-04-04 Thread Andreas Wiatowski
I’m not sure if you run into this in the USA…. But it seems that KODI / XBMC 
traffic is almost on par with Netflix on our network (About a 100Mbps 
difference in favour of Netflix.).  Are others here seeing this trend? Or is 
this just a Canadian problem?


Cheers,

Andreas Wiatowski, CEO
Silo Wireless Inc.
519-449-5656 x-600



Re: [AFMUG] Refurb UPS dealers?

2016-04-04 Thread Jason Wilson
Try this guy on Ebay from Carson City Nevada.  I have done buisness with
him before.
http://www.ebay.com/sch/m.html?_sop=10&_ssn=uspowerups&_pgn=2&_skc=50=nc

Jason


Jason Wilson
Remotely Located
Providing High Speed Internet to out of the way places.
530-651-1736
530-748-9608 Cell
www.remotelylocated.com

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 6:00 PM, Eric Kuhnke  wrote:

> Because I don't want to buy a bunch of cheap and used, for example
> SUA1500RM2U UPS, and discover their charge controller or inverter are
> messed up. Or it's had a battery swell and leak all over insides.
>
> something like this, plus $25 100BaseTX IP management card:
>
>
> http://www.ebay.com/itm/APC-SUA1500RM2U-SMART-UPS-1500VA-980W-120V-USB-RACKMOUNT-BACKUP-NEW-BATTERIES-/291583017738?hash=item43e3b3c30a:g:tEsAAOSwoydWnp79
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 5:57 PM, can...@believewireless.net <
> p...@believewireless.net> wrote:
>
>> Why not buy the batteries on your own?
>>
>
>


Re: [AFMUG] Drug Testing

2016-04-04 Thread Josh Luthman
Ohio BWC gives you a benefit for random drug tests or something like that.
I'm not sure what the extent is...


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 9:18 PM, Keefe John  wrote:

> Just curious who here drugs tests employees.
>
> Our insurance company is making us do a sweep on drivers.
>
> Keefe
>


Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

2016-04-04 Thread Mike Hammett
I gotta see when the next Ideal sale is. :-) 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 




- Original Message -

From: "Chuck McCown"  
To: af@afmug.com 
Sent: Monday, April 4, 2016 2:36:59 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests? 




I just tested a cable tester from Ideal that qualifies GigE circuits. 

Nice thing is, it will do a data test without cable continuity. 
(It also does the actual cable continuity tests too). 

I wonder what it would show on a less than 1Gbps radio. $1325 




From: Harold Bledsoe 
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 1:32 PM 
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests? 


Sorry to be late to the party. ;-) 

I have a few comments on iperf though. Iperf2 is not very reliable at high 
speeds. For high speeds, iperf3 tends to do a little better assuming you have 
enough computer to push the required speeds. However iperf3 cannot yet do bi-di 
tests. 

For affordable testing, we've found Mikrotik's traffic generator to be pretty 
good. It's a little complicated to setup the first time but then it is better. 
Beware using btest - it uses a single core and can't keep up especially if you 
try random data. 

Then there's RFC testers like Exfo, Smartbits, etc. We use Smartbits. 

Thanks, 
-Hal 


On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 9:15 AM Stefan Englhardt < s...@genias.net > wrote: 





Every new gear is suspicious in regards of holding up to the promises made. 

We’ve heard so many promises in the past and very often the truth does not meet 
marketing. 

So there is nothing aggressive if someone wants to see iperf testing. Seeing is 
believing. 




Von: Af [mailto: af-boun...@afmug.com ] Im Auftrag von Ken Hohhof 
Gesendet: Montag, 4. April 2016 15:08 
An: af@afmug.com 
Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests? 








By comparison to the presidential contest, the tone was very mild! Did you see 
Jimmy Kimmel’s American Girl & Boy Dolls Presidential Collection? 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded=FYHPr7TL2AY 










From: Faisal Imtiaz 

Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 8:03 AM 

To: af@afmug.com 








Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests? 









I am not being defensive about Ignite, as I stated in my email I am having 
a reaction to the tone of your question. If you were to look at my posts you 
will also see that I have expressed similar feelings to others in regards to 
how they ask the question... irrespective of who they are asking about. I also 
apologized for this being a personality defect in myself. 



The Cut & Paste was not for your benefit, but for others who lurk in the 
forums. 



There is nothing wrong with running an iperf test.. but you specifically asked 
for the test to be run in a very particular way, from very particular pieces of 
equipment. 



My apologies if I am over reacting WISP's have many many great attributes, 
however there is one attribute which would be nice to change for the better 
Our Attitudes towards the mfg. and the default presumption of a 'conspiracy' or 
'they are trying to pull a fast one on us'. along with it also having 
enough fortitude to asking the MFG and or their representatives the technical 
questions before coming to the open forums and taking an opinion poll 



ok, I will now get off my soap box. 







Regards 





Faisal Imtiaz 
Snappy Internet & Telecom 
7266 SW 48 Street 
Miami, FL 33155 
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 

Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net 







From: "Eric Kuhnke" < eric.kuh...@gmail.com > 
To: af@afmug.com 
Sent: Sunday, April 3, 2016 11:52:00 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests? 






For somebody who doesn't own a piece of the company and doesn't work there, 
you're extremely defensive. I don't need a copied and pasted explanation of 
what FDD and TDD are. 

How in any way whatsoever is it inappropriate to run iperf tests on a newly 
released PTP bridge radio? 




On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 8:31 PM, Faisal Imtiaz < fai...@snappytelecom.net > 
wrote: 







like I said before.. ask the question directly... no need for the cloak and 
dagger ... 



--- 

Frequency-division duplexing (FDD) is a method for establishing a full-duplex 
communications link that uses two different radio frequencies for transmitter 
and receiver operation. The transmit direction and receive direction 
frequencies are separated by a defined frequency offset. In the microwave 
realm, the primary advantages of this approach are: 

- 

NO THEY ARE NOT FDD. 



 

Time-division duplexing (TDD) is a method for emulating full-duplex 
communication over a half-duplex communication link. The transmitter and 
receiver both use the same frequency but transmit and receive traffic is 
switched in time. The primary advantages of this approach as it 

[AFMUG] Drug Testing

2016-04-04 Thread Keefe John

Just curious who here drugs tests employees.

Our insurance company is making us do a sweep on drivers.

Keefe


Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

2016-04-04 Thread Josh Luthman
Why would the distance matter?


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 8:41 PM, Harold Bledsoe  wrote:

> The standard mount is being improved a bit (same cost) as well as an
> optional LR upgraded mount for longer distances.
>
> Thanks,
> -Hal
>
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 7:49 PM Josh Reynolds  wrote:
>
>> I thought they were releasing a 2nd gen mount?
>> On Apr 4, 2016 6:35 PM, "Ken Hohhof"  wrote:
>>
>>> Wasn’t there a post from them saying for a few bucks more there is a
>>> better mount?
>>>
>>>
>>
>>> *From:* Cassidy B. Larson 
>>> *Sent:* Monday, April 04, 2016 6:18 PM
>>>
>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
>>>
>> FWIW on these IgniteNet 60GHz, the mounts are horrendous. We got a couple
>>> of pairs and my installers are saying they’re worse than a nano bridge
>>> mount.. For the stability one would need to keep these locked on during a
>>> breeze, we were expecting a much heavier duty mount.
>>>
>>>
>> Chuck, another product idea for ya :)
>>>
>>> -c
>>>
>> On Apr 4, 2016, at 4:40 PM, Ken Hohhof  wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I thought that was Trump’s plan to eliminate the national debt in 8
>>> years!
>>>
>>> Or a new reality TV show:  Naked and Unshod.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Faisal Imtiaz 
>>> *Sent:* Monday, April 04, 2016 5:31 PM
>>>
>>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
>>>
>>> I often tell my wife
>>>
>>>
>>> If the women of the world stopped buying shoes and clothes for 3 months,
>>> there will be a total world wide economic collapse !
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> :)
>>>
>>> Faisal Imtiaz
>>> Snappy Internet & Telecom
>>> 7266 SW 48 Street
>>> Miami, FL 33155
>>> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
>>>
>>> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
>>> 
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> *From: *"Jaime Solorza" 
>>> *To: *"Animal Farm" 
>>> *Sent: *Monday, April 4, 2016 3:58:01 PM
>>>
>>>
>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
>>>
>>> Ha
>>>
>>> On Apr 4, 2016 1:53 PM, "Chuck McCown"  wrote:
>>>
>>> I told my wife this morning that I am going to have to find a rehab
 center for an Amazon addict.

>>> *From:* Jaime Solorza 
 *Sent:* Monday, April 04, 2016 1:47 PM
 *To:* Animal Farm 

>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

>>> My wife always complains that I don't need more tools   I respond...
 when you stop buying shoes, I will stop buying tools...she gives me the
 death stare.

>>> On Apr 4, 2016 1:44 PM, "Faisal Imtiaz" 
 wrote:

>>> Chuck, somehow you remind me of my business partner who goes looking
> for projects, cause they are a perfect opportunity to collect (buy) more
> tools... one can never have enough tools !
>
> (He is more into power tools, construction, mechanical etc ...)
>
>
 :)
>
> Faisal Imtiaz
> Snappy Internet & Telecom
> 7266 SW 48 Street
> Miami, FL 33155
> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 <305%20663%205518%20x%20232>
>
> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
> 
>
> --
>
 *From: *"Chuck McCown" 
> *To: *af@afmug.com
> *Sent: *Monday, April 4, 2016 3:36:59 PM
>
>
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
>
> I just tested a cable tester from Ideal that qualifies GigE circuits.
>
>
> Nice thing is, it will do a data test without cable continuity.
> (It also does the actual cable continuity tests too).
>
> I wonder what it would show on a less than 1Gbps radio.  $1325
>
>
> *From:* Harold Bledsoe 
> *Sent:* Monday, April 04, 2016 1:32 PM
>
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
>
> Sorry to be late to the party.  ;-)
>
> I have a few comments on iperf though.  Iperf2 is not very reliable at
> high speeds.  For high speeds, iperf3 tends to do a little better assuming
> you have enough computer to push the required speeds.  However iperf3
> cannot yet do bi-di tests.
>
> For affordable testing, we've found Mikrotik's traffic generator to be
> pretty good.  It's a little complicated to setup the first time but then 
> it
> is better.  Beware using btest - it uses a single core and can't keep up
> especially if you try random data.
>
> Then there's RFC testers like Exfo, Smartbits, etc.  We use Smartbits.
>
> Thanks,
> -Hal
>

Re: [AFMUG] Refurb UPS dealers?

2016-04-04 Thread can...@believewireless.net
Why not buy the batteries on your own?


[AFMUG] Refurb UPS dealers?

2016-04-04 Thread Eric Kuhnke
Looking for updated pricing on 1200VA to 2200VA sized, 2U rackmount UPS.

I know there are some refurb dealers out there which take older APC and
TrippLite units and refurbish them with new AGM batteries. Any
recommendations?


Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

2016-04-04 Thread Josh Reynolds
I thought they were releasing a 2nd gen mount?
On Apr 4, 2016 6:35 PM, "Ken Hohhof"  wrote:

> Wasn’t there a post from them saying for a few bucks more there is a
> better mount?
>
>
> *From:* Cassidy B. Larson 
> *Sent:* Monday, April 04, 2016 6:18 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
>
> FWIW on these IgniteNet 60GHz, the mounts are horrendous. We got a couple
> of pairs and my installers are saying they’re worse than a nano bridge
> mount.. For the stability one would need to keep these locked on during a
> breeze, we were expecting a much heavier duty mount.
>
> Chuck, another product idea for ya :)
>
> -c
>
>
> On Apr 4, 2016, at 4:40 PM, Ken Hohhof  wrote:
>
> I thought that was Trump’s plan to eliminate the national debt in 8 years!
>
> Or a new reality TV show:  Naked and Unshod.
>
>
> *From:* Faisal Imtiaz 
> *Sent:* Monday, April 04, 2016 5:31 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
>
> I often tell my wife
>
> If the women of the world stopped buying shoes and clothes for 3 months,
> there will be a total world wide economic collapse !
>
>
> :)
>
> Faisal Imtiaz
> Snappy Internet & Telecom
> 7266 SW 48 Street
> Miami, FL 33155
> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
>
> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
> 
>
> --
>
> *From: *"Jaime Solorza" 
> *To: *"Animal Farm" 
> *Sent: *Monday, April 4, 2016 3:58:01 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
>
> Ha
> On Apr 4, 2016 1:53 PM, "Chuck McCown"  wrote:
>
>> I told my wife this morning that I am going to have to find a rehab
>> center for an Amazon addict.
>>
>> *From:* Jaime Solorza 
>> *Sent:* Monday, April 04, 2016 1:47 PM
>> *To:* Animal Farm 
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
>>
>> My wife always complains that I don't need more tools   I respond... when
>> you stop buying shoes, I will stop buying tools...she gives me the death
>> stare.
>> On Apr 4, 2016 1:44 PM, "Faisal Imtiaz"  wrote:
>>
>>> Chuck, somehow you remind me of my business partner who goes looking
>>> for projects, cause they are a perfect opportunity to collect (buy) more
>>> tools... one can never have enough tools !
>>>
>>> (He is more into power tools, construction, mechanical etc ...)
>>>
>>> :)
>>>
>>> Faisal Imtiaz
>>> Snappy Internet & Telecom
>>> 7266 SW 48 Street
>>> Miami, FL 33155
>>> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 <305%20663%205518%20x%20232>
>>>
>>> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
>>> 
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> *From: *"Chuck McCown" 
>>> *To: *af@afmug.com
>>> *Sent: *Monday, April 4, 2016 3:36:59 PM
>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
>>>
>>> I just tested a cable tester from Ideal that qualifies GigE circuits.
>>>
>>> Nice thing is, it will do a data test without cable continuity.
>>> (It also does the actual cable continuity tests too).
>>>
>>> I wonder what it would show on a less than 1Gbps radio.  $1325
>>>
>>> *From:* Harold Bledsoe 
>>> *Sent:* Monday, April 04, 2016 1:32 PM
>>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
>>>
>>> Sorry to be late to the party.  ;-)
>>>
>>> I have a few comments on iperf though.  Iperf2 is not very reliable at
>>> high speeds.  For high speeds, iperf3 tends to do a little better assuming
>>> you have enough computer to push the required speeds.  However iperf3
>>> cannot yet do bi-di tests.
>>>
>>> For affordable testing, we've found Mikrotik's traffic generator to be
>>> pretty good.  It's a little complicated to setup the first time but then it
>>> is better.  Beware using btest - it uses a single core and can't keep up
>>> especially if you try random data.
>>>
>>> Then there's RFC testers like Exfo, Smartbits, etc.  We use Smartbits.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> -Hal
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 9:15 AM Stefan Englhardt  wrote:
>>>
 Every new gear is suspicious in regards of holding up to the promises
 made.


 We’ve heard so many promises in the past and very often the truth does
 not meet marketing.


 So there is nothing aggressive if someone wants to see iperf testing.
 Seeing is believing.




 *Von:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *Im Auftrag von *Ken Hohhof
 *Gesendet:* Montag, 4. April 2016 15:08
 *An:* af@afmug.com
 *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?



 By comparison to the presidential contest, the tone was very mild!  Did
 you see Jimmy Kimmel’s American Girl & Boy Dolls Presidential 

Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

2016-04-04 Thread Eric Kuhnke
I realize it would be very costly for inexpensive products, but if anyone
has ever installed and aimed a 1' size (30cm) Radiowaves high performance
dish for licensed bands, those are great mounts...

Swappable between left hand or right hand orientation off a pole, screw
drive for fine tuning elevation adjustment, and you can use a box-end
ratcheting wrench to creep the azimuth across while aiming.

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 4:35 PM, Ken Hohhof  wrote:

> Wasn’t there a post from them saying for a few bucks more there is a
> better mount?
>
>
> *From:* Cassidy B. Larson 
> *Sent:* Monday, April 04, 2016 6:18 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
>
> FWIW on these IgniteNet 60GHz, the mounts are horrendous. We got a couple
> of pairs and my installers are saying they’re worse than a nano bridge
> mount.. For the stability one would need to keep these locked on during a
> breeze, we were expecting a much heavier duty mount.
>
> Chuck, another product idea for ya :)
>
> -c
>
>
> On Apr 4, 2016, at 4:40 PM, Ken Hohhof  wrote:
>
> I thought that was Trump’s plan to eliminate the national debt in 8 years!
>
> Or a new reality TV show:  Naked and Unshod.
>
>
> *From:* Faisal Imtiaz 
> *Sent:* Monday, April 04, 2016 5:31 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
>
> I often tell my wife
>
> If the women of the world stopped buying shoes and clothes for 3 months,
> there will be a total world wide economic collapse !
>
>
> :)
>
> Faisal Imtiaz
> Snappy Internet & Telecom
> 7266 SW 48 Street
> Miami, FL 33155
> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
>
> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
> 
>
> --
>
> *From: *"Jaime Solorza" 
> *To: *"Animal Farm" 
> *Sent: *Monday, April 4, 2016 3:58:01 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
>
> Ha
> On Apr 4, 2016 1:53 PM, "Chuck McCown"  wrote:
>
>> I told my wife this morning that I am going to have to find a rehab
>> center for an Amazon addict.
>>
>> *From:* Jaime Solorza 
>> *Sent:* Monday, April 04, 2016 1:47 PM
>> *To:* Animal Farm 
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
>>
>> My wife always complains that I don't need more tools   I respond... when
>> you stop buying shoes, I will stop buying tools...she gives me the death
>> stare.
>> On Apr 4, 2016 1:44 PM, "Faisal Imtiaz"  wrote:
>>
>>> Chuck, somehow you remind me of my business partner who goes looking
>>> for projects, cause they are a perfect opportunity to collect (buy) more
>>> tools... one can never have enough tools !
>>>
>>> (He is more into power tools, construction, mechanical etc ...)
>>>
>>> :)
>>>
>>> Faisal Imtiaz
>>> Snappy Internet & Telecom
>>> 7266 SW 48 Street
>>> Miami, FL 33155
>>> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 <305%20663%205518%20x%20232>
>>>
>>> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
>>> 
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> *From: *"Chuck McCown" 
>>> *To: *af@afmug.com
>>> *Sent: *Monday, April 4, 2016 3:36:59 PM
>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
>>>
>>> I just tested a cable tester from Ideal that qualifies GigE circuits.
>>>
>>> Nice thing is, it will do a data test without cable continuity.
>>> (It also does the actual cable continuity tests too).
>>>
>>> I wonder what it would show on a less than 1Gbps radio.  $1325
>>>
>>> *From:* Harold Bledsoe 
>>> *Sent:* Monday, April 04, 2016 1:32 PM
>>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
>>>
>>> Sorry to be late to the party.  ;-)
>>>
>>> I have a few comments on iperf though.  Iperf2 is not very reliable at
>>> high speeds.  For high speeds, iperf3 tends to do a little better assuming
>>> you have enough computer to push the required speeds.  However iperf3
>>> cannot yet do bi-di tests.
>>>
>>> For affordable testing, we've found Mikrotik's traffic generator to be
>>> pretty good.  It's a little complicated to setup the first time but then it
>>> is better.  Beware using btest - it uses a single core and can't keep up
>>> especially if you try random data.
>>>
>>> Then there's RFC testers like Exfo, Smartbits, etc.  We use Smartbits.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> -Hal
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 9:15 AM Stefan Englhardt  wrote:
>>>
 Every new gear is suspicious in regards of holding up to the promises
 made.


 We’ve heard so many promises in the past and very often the truth does
 not meet marketing.


 So there is nothing aggressive if someone wants to see iperf testing.
 Seeing is believing.





Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

2016-04-04 Thread Ken Hohhof
Wasn’t there a post from them saying for a few bucks more there is a better 
mount?


From: Cassidy B. Larson 
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 6:18 PM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

FWIW on these IgniteNet 60GHz, the mounts are horrendous. We got a couple of 
pairs and my installers are saying they’re worse than a nano bridge mount.. For 
the stability one would need to keep these locked on during a breeze, we were 
expecting a much heavier duty mount.  

Chuck, another product idea for ya :) 

-c

  On Apr 4, 2016, at 4:40 PM, Ken Hohhof  wrote:

  I thought that was Trump’s plan to eliminate the national debt in 8 years!

  Or a new reality TV show:  Naked and Unshod.


  From: Faisal Imtiaz 
  Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 5:31 PM
  To: af@afmug.com 
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

  I often tell my wife 

  If the women of the world stopped buying shoes and clothes for 3 months, 
there will be a total world wide economic collapse !


  :)

  Faisal Imtiaz
  Snappy Internet & Telecom
  7266 SW 48 Street
  Miami, FL 33155
  Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

  Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net


--

From: "Jaime Solorza" 
To: "Animal Farm" 
Sent: Monday, April 4, 2016 3:58:01 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

Ha
On Apr 4, 2016 1:53 PM, "Chuck McCown"  wrote:

  I told my wife this morning that I am going to have to find a rehab 
center for an Amazon addict. 

  From: Jaime Solorza
  Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 1:47 PM
  To: Animal Farm
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

  My wife always complains that I don't need more tools   I respond... when 
you stop buying shoes, I will stop buying tools...she gives me the death stare.
  On Apr 4, 2016 1:44 PM, "Faisal Imtiaz"  wrote:

Chuck, somehow you remind me of my business partner who goes 
looking for projects, cause they are a perfect opportunity to collect (buy) 
more tools... one can never have enough tools !

(He is more into power tools, construction, mechanical etc ...)

:)

Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet & Telecom
7266 SW 48 Street
Miami, FL 33155
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net




  From: "Chuck McCown" 
  To: af@afmug.com
  Sent: Monday, April 4, 2016 3:36:59 PM
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

  I just tested a cable tester from Ideal that qualifies GigE circuits.

  Nice thing is, it will do a data test without cable continuity.
  (It also does the actual cable continuity tests too).

  I wonder what it would show on a less than 1Gbps radio.  $1325

  From: Harold Bledsoe
  Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 1:32 PM
  To: af@afmug.com
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

  Sorry to be late to the party.  ;-) 

  I have a few comments on iperf though.  Iperf2 is not very reliable 
at high speeds.  For high speeds, iperf3 tends to do a little better assuming 
you have enough computer to push the required speeds.  However iperf3 cannot 
yet do bi-di tests.

  For affordable testing, we've found Mikrotik's traffic generator to 
be pretty good.  It's a little complicated to setup the first time but then it 
is better.  Beware using btest - it uses a single core and can't keep up 
especially if you try random data.

  Then there's RFC testers like Exfo, Smartbits, etc.  We use Smartbits.

  Thanks,
  -Hal

  On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 9:15 AM Stefan Englhardt  
wrote:

Every new gear is suspicious in regards of holding up to the 
promises made.

 
We’ve heard so many promises in the past and very often the truth 
does not meet marketing.

 
So there is nothing aggressive if someone wants to see iperf 
testing. Seeing is believing.

 

 
Von: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] Im Auftrag von Ken Hohhof
Gesendet: Montag, 4. April 2016 15:08
An: af@afmug.com
Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

 

By comparison to the presidential contest, the tone was very mild!  
Did you see Jimmy Kimmel’s American Girl & Boy Dolls Presidential Collection?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded=FYHPr7TL2AY

 
From: Faisal Imtiaz 

Sent: 

Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

2016-04-04 Thread Cassidy B. Larson
FWIW on these IgniteNet 60GHz, the mounts are horrendous. We got a couple of 
pairs and my installers are saying they’re worse than a nano bridge mount.. For 
the stability one would need to keep these locked on during a breeze, we were 
expecting a much heavier duty mount.

Chuck, another product idea for ya :)

-c

> On Apr 4, 2016, at 4:40 PM, Ken Hohhof  wrote:
> 
> I thought that was Trump’s plan to eliminate the national debt in 8 years!
> 
> Or a new reality TV show:  Naked and Unshod.
> 
> 
> From: Faisal Imtiaz 
> Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 5:31 PM
> To: af@afmug.com 
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
> 
> I often tell my wife
> 
> If the women of the world stopped buying shoes and clothes for 3 months, 
> there will be a total world wide economic collapse !
> 
> 
> :)
> 
> Faisal Imtiaz
> Snappy Internet & Telecom
> 7266 SW 48 Street
> Miami, FL 33155
> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
> 
> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
> 
>> From: "Jaime Solorza" 
>> To: "Animal Farm" 
>> Sent: Monday, April 4, 2016 3:58:01 PM
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
> 
>> Ha
>> On Apr 4, 2016 1:53 PM, "Chuck McCown" > > wrote:
>>> I told my wife this morning that I am going to have to find a rehab center 
>>> for an Amazon addict.
>>> 
>>> From: Jaime Solorza 
>>> Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 1:47 PM
>>> To: Animal Farm 
>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
>>> 
>>> My wife always complains that I don't need more tools   I respond... when 
>>> you stop buying shoes, I will stop buying tools...she gives me the death 
>>> stare.
>>> On Apr 4, 2016 1:44 PM, "Faisal Imtiaz" >> > wrote:
 Chuck, somehow you remind me of my business partner who goes looking 
 for projects, cause they are a perfect opportunity to collect (buy) more 
 tools... one can never have enough tools !
 
 (He is more into power tools, construction, mechanical etc ...)
 
 :)
 
 Faisal Imtiaz
 Snappy Internet & Telecom
 7266 SW 48 Street
 Miami, FL 33155
 Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 
 
 Help-desk: (305)663-5518  Option 2 or Email: 
 supp...@snappytelecom.net
 
> From: "Chuck McCown" >
> To: af@afmug.com 
> Sent: Monday, April 4, 2016 3:36:59 PM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
 
> I just tested a cable tester from Ideal that qualifies GigE circuits.
> 
> Nice thing is, it will do a data test without cable continuity.
> (It also does the actual cable continuity tests too).
> 
> I wonder what it would show on a less than 1Gbps radio.  $1325
> 
> From: Harold Bledsoe 
> Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 1:32 PM
> To: af@afmug.com 
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
> 
> Sorry to be late to the party.  ;-)
> 
> I have a few comments on iperf though.  Iperf2 is not very reliable at 
> high speeds.  For high speeds, iperf3 tends to do a little better 
> assuming you have enough computer to push the required speeds.  However 
> iperf3 cannot yet do bi-di tests.
> 
> For affordable testing, we've found Mikrotik's traffic generator to be 
> pretty good.  It's a little complicated to setup the first time but then 
> it is better.  Beware using btest - it uses a single core and can't keep 
> up especially if you try random data.
> 
> Then there's RFC testers like Exfo, Smartbits, etc.  We use Smartbits.
> 
> Thanks,
> -Hal
> 
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 9:15 AM Stefan Englhardt  > wrote:
>> Every new gear is suspicious in regards of holding up to the promises 
>> made.
>> 
>> We’ve heard so many promises in the past and very often the truth does 
>> not meet marketing.
>> 
>> So there is nothing aggressive if someone wants to see iperf testing. 
>> Seeing is believing.
>> 
>> 
>> Von: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com ] Im 
>> Auftrag von Ken Hohhof
>> Gesendet: Montag, 4. April 2016 15:08
>> An: af@afmug.com 
>> Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
>> 
>> 
>> By comparison to the presidential contest, the tone was very mild!  Did 
>> you see Jimmy Kimmel’s American Girl & Boy Dolls Presidential Collection?
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded=FYHPr7TL2AY 
>> 

Re: [AFMUG] we have a bottleneck...

2016-04-04 Thread That One Guy /sarcasm
This is a good opportinty for PR. if its a certainty that you can deliver
the speed reliably and this is just a hiccup, throw him the difference
betweent he two packages as a discount for the month, maybe even a second
month for his trouble. Let them know you identified the issue, thank them
for bringing it to your attention, resolve it, and verify its resolved.
Just make sure the issue actually exists for the customer first and its not
just some dumb issue on his end, that could be a disaster for PR if thats
not resolved first

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 5:48 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller 
wrote:

>
> Temp, hope to relieve it tomorrow.  A customer who just upgraded to faster
> service says slow it back down - not getting any faster speed (he probably
> did before the bottleneck happened)
>
> would you:
>
> a) give him some money back on his last bill and ask him to stick it out
> another month?
> b) go ahead and lower his speed back to the former package?
>
> i'd certainly like to explain what happened but the customer isn't going
> to care much for technobabble anyway.
>
> i'm pretty sure i know how i'm going to handle this but - say - for
> example - i know a certain brand of radio (actually TWO brands) can get
> stuck on the wrong ethernet duplex...so i'm sure this has happened in
> another network before.  just curious how you'd handle it.
>
> thanks :)
>
>
>



-- 
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as
part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.


Re: [AFMUG] we have a bottleneck...

2016-04-04 Thread Jim Bouse [Brazos WiFi]
We had a similar situation. We apologized and lowered the speed/price with the 
promise that we would call him back after the upgrade was fixed.

A month later, we called back and he moved up again and was pleasantly suprised 
with the improvement. He then went on to brag on his NextDoor app about our 
transparency and how great it was.



Jim Bouse
Owner
Brazos WiFi
979-985-5912
j...@brazoswifi.com


 Original message 
From: CBB - Jay Fuller 
Date: 04/04/2016 5:48 PM (GMT-06:00)
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] we have a bottleneck...


Temp, hope to relieve it tomorrow.  A customer who just upgraded to faster 
service says slow it back down - not getting any faster speed (he probably did 
before the bottleneck happened)

would you:

a) give him some money back on his last bill and ask him to stick it out 
another month?
b) go ahead and lower his speed back to the former package?

i'd certainly like to explain what happened but the customer isn't going to 
care much for technobabble anyway.

i'm pretty sure i know how i'm going to handle this but - say - for example - i 
know a certain brand of radio (actually TWO brands) can get stuck on the wrong 
ethernet duplex...so i'm sure this has happened in another network before.  
just curious how you'd handle it.

thanks :)




[AFMUG] we have a bottleneck...

2016-04-04 Thread CBB - Jay Fuller

Temp, hope to relieve it tomorrow.  A customer who just upgraded to faster 
service says slow it back down - not getting any faster speed (he probably did 
before the bottleneck happened)

would you:

a) give him some money back on his last bill and ask him to stick it out 
another month?
b) go ahead and lower his speed back to the former package?

i'd certainly like to explain what happened but the customer isn't going to 
care much for technobabble anyway.

i'm pretty sure i know how i'm going to handle this but - say - for example - i 
know a certain brand of radio (actually TWO brands) can get stuck on the wrong 
ethernet duplex...so i'm sure this has happened in another network before.  
just curious how you'd handle it.

thanks :)



Re: [AFMUG] New installer tool for tree problems

2016-04-04 Thread That One Guy /sarcasm
yeah, i think the gun kid ended up getting investigated because of some
technicality about altering a weapon to be automated since it was
physically disconnected from the operator


On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Mathew Howard  wrote:

> yeah, there didn't appear to be any mechanism to rotate it, and all of
> those shots would be easily faked... that was pretty awesome how easily
> those balloons took it down though.
>
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 4:08 PM, James Howard  wrote:
>
>> Looked to me that they faked the parts where the saw was actually
>> cutting.  I doubt that crappy McCulloch chainsaw would run very long upside
>> down anyway but every time they show it cutting anything the bar was
>> cutting horizontal and it was always vertical when they showed shots from
>> the other drone or the ground? Didn’t look like it was setup to rotate the
>> chainsaw sideways and the only stuff I could see attached to the chainsaw
>> was the camera on the front of it, nothing to run the throttle.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Robert Andrews
>> *Sent:* Monday, April 04, 2016 2:55 PM
>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] New installer tool for tree problems
>>
>>
>>
>> Makes you realize how easy it is to get rid of that pesky drone that
>> keeps showing up over your back yard. A bag of 10 cent balloons, a
>> tank of helium and a roll of kite string... Instant barrage balloons
>> protection..
>>
>> On 04/04/2016 12:18 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
>> > LOL :)
>> >
>> > On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Jaime Solorza <
>> losguyswirel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Balloon 1 Drone 0
>> >>
>> >> On Apr 4, 2016 1:03 PM, "Randy Cosby"  wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> http://video.dailymail.co.uk/video/mol/2016/04/03/8869074933904817371/640x360_8869074933904817371.mp4
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Randy Cosby
>> >>>
>> >>> Vice President
>> >>>
>> >>> InfoWest, Inc
>> >>>
>> >>> 435-674-0165
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >
>>
>> --
>>
>> *Total Control Panel*
>>
>> Login 
>>
>> To: ja...@litewire.net
>> 
>>
>> From:
>> 01000153e2d7e913-0aeeca62-4a7e-4eef-b733-b13c1b4f802e-000...@amazonses.com
>>
>> Remove
>> 
>> amazonses.com from my allow list
>>
>> *You received this message because the domain amazonses.com
>>  is on your allow list.*
>>
>>
>>
>
>


-- 
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as
part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.


Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

2016-04-04 Thread Ken Hohhof
I thought that was Trump’s plan to eliminate the national debt in 8 years!

Or a new reality TV show:  Naked and Unshod.


From: Faisal Imtiaz 
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 5:31 PM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

I often tell my wife 

If the women of the world stopped buying shoes and clothes for 3 months, there 
will be a total world wide economic collapse !


:)

Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet & Telecom
7266 SW 48 Street
Miami, FL 33155
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net




  From: "Jaime Solorza" 
  To: "Animal Farm" 
  Sent: Monday, April 4, 2016 3:58:01 PM
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

  Ha

  On Apr 4, 2016 1:53 PM, "Chuck McCown"  wrote:

I told my wife this morning that I am going to have to find a rehab center 
for an Amazon addict. 

From: Jaime Solorza
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 1:47 PM
To: Animal Farm
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

My wife always complains that I don't need more tools   I respond... when 
you stop buying shoes, I will stop buying tools...she gives me the death stare.

On Apr 4, 2016 1:44 PM, "Faisal Imtiaz"  wrote:

  Chuck, somehow you remind me of my business partner who goes looking 
for projects, cause they are a perfect opportunity to collect (buy) more 
tools... one can never have enough tools !

  (He is more into power tools, construction, mechanical etc ...)

  :)

  Faisal Imtiaz
  Snappy Internet & Telecom
  7266 SW 48 Street
  Miami, FL 33155
  Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

  Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net


--

From: "Chuck McCown" 
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Monday, April 4, 2016 3:36:59 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

I just tested a cable tester from Ideal that qualifies GigE circuits.

Nice thing is, it will do a data test without cable continuity.
(It also does the actual cable continuity tests too).

I wonder what it would show on a less than 1Gbps radio.  $1325

From: Harold Bledsoe
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 1:32 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

Sorry to be late to the party.  ;-) 

I have a few comments on iperf though.  Iperf2 is not very reliable at 
high speeds.  For high speeds, iperf3 tends to do a little better assuming you 
have enough computer to push the required speeds.  However iperf3 cannot yet do 
bi-di tests.

For affordable testing, we've found Mikrotik's traffic generator to be 
pretty good.  It's a little complicated to setup the first time but then it is 
better.  Beware using btest - it uses a single core and can't keep up 
especially if you try random data.

Then there's RFC testers like Exfo, Smartbits, etc.  We use Smartbits.

Thanks,
-Hal

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 9:15 AM Stefan Englhardt  wrote:

  Every new gear is suspicious in regards of holding up to the promises 
made.



  We’ve heard so many promises in the past and very often the truth 
does not meet marketing.



  So there is nothing aggressive if someone wants to see iperf testing. 
Seeing is believing.





  Von: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] Im Auftrag von Ken Hohhof
  Gesendet: Montag, 4. April 2016 15:08
  An: af@afmug.com
  Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?




  By comparison to the presidential contest, the tone was very mild!  
Did you see Jimmy Kimmel’s American Girl & Boy Dolls Presidential Collection?

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded=FYHPr7TL2AY



  From: Faisal Imtiaz 

  Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 8:03 AM

  To: af@afmug.com 

  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?



  I am not being defensive about Ignite, as I stated in my email I 
am having a reaction to the tone of your question. If you were to look at my 
posts you will also see that I have expressed similar feelings to others in 
regards to how they ask the question... irrespective of who they are asking 
about.  I also apologized for this being a personality defect in myself.



  The Cut & Paste was not for your benefit, but for others who lurk in 
the forums.



  There is nothing wrong with running an iperf test.. but you 
specifically asked for the test to be run in a very particular way, from very 
particular pieces of equipment. 



  My 

Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

2016-04-04 Thread Daniel White
Even when I had my manufacturer hat on… it’s hard to dismiss that many 
manufacturers put too heavy of a marketing spin on stuff.  And new companies 
are hard to judge one way or another.



Also most manufacturers cringe at iPerf testing since there are so many 
variables.



Daniel White

Managing Director – Hardware Distribution Sales

ConVergence Technologies

Cell: +1 (303) 746-3590

  dwh...@converge-tech.com



From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Stefan Englhardt
Sent: Monday, April 4, 2016 8:15 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?



Every new gear is suspicious in regards of holding up to the promises made.



We’ve heard so many promises in the past and very often the truth does not meet 
marketing.



So there is nothing aggressive if someone wants to see iperf testing. Seeing is 
believing.





Von: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] Im Auftrag von Ken Hohhof
Gesendet: Montag, 4. April 2016 15:08
An: af@afmug.com 
Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?



By comparison to the presidential contest, the tone was very mild!  Did you see 
Jimmy Kimmel’s American Girl & Boy Dolls Presidential Collection?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded 
 
=FYHPr7TL2AY





From: Faisal Imtiaz 

Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 8:03 AM

To: af@afmug.com 

Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?



I am not being defensive about Ignite, as I stated in my email I am having 
a reaction to the tone of your question. If you were to look at my posts you 
will also see that I have expressed similar feelings to others in regards to 
how they ask the question... irrespective of who they are asking about.  I also 
apologized for this being a personality defect in myself.



The Cut & Paste was not for your benefit, but for others who lurk in the forums.



There is nothing wrong with running an iperf test.. but you specifically asked 
for the test to be run in a very particular way, from very particular pieces of 
equipment.



My apologies if I am over reacting WISP's have many many great attributes, 
however there is one attribute which would be nice to change for the better 
Our Attitudes towards the mfg. and the default presumption of a 'conspiracy' or 
'they are trying to pull a fast one on us'. along with it also having 
enough fortitude to asking the MFG and or their representatives the technical 
questions before coming to the open forums and taking an opinion poll



ok, I will now get off my soap box.







Regards





Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet & Telecom
7266 SW 48 Street
Miami, FL 33155
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net 




  _

From: "Eric Kuhnke"  >
To: af@afmug.com 
Sent: Sunday, April 3, 2016 11:52:00 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

For somebody who doesn't own a piece of the company and doesn't work there, 
you're extremely defensive. I don't need a copied and pasted explanation of 
what FDD and TDD are.

How in any way whatsoever is it inappropriate to run iperf tests on a newly 
released PTP bridge radio?



On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 8:31 PM, Faisal Imtiaz  > wrote:

like I said before..  ask the question directly... no need for the cloak and 
dagger ...



---

Frequency-division duplexing (FDD) is a method for establishing a full-duplex 
communications link that uses two different radio frequencies for transmitter 
and receiver operation. The transmit direction and receive direction 
frequencies are separated by a defined frequency offset. In the microwave 
realm, the primary advantages of this approach are:

-

NO THEY ARE NOT FDD.





Time-division duplexing (TDD) is a method for emulating full-duplex 
communication over a half-duplex communication link. The transmitter and 
receiver both use the same frequency but transmit and receive traffic is 
switched in time. The primary advantages of this approach as it applies to 
microwave communication are:

--

YES They are TDD. ( The notation of 1gig aggregate should have give this away ! 
)



Like all new products, they are making improvements with firmware updates. The 
published specs are 'conservative'.



These are the first radios of their kind in the market place... I think you 
will need to modify your thinking about them, cause you keep comparing them to 
the other existing (much more expensive) radios in the market place.



Anything else you would like to know ?



Feel free to ask..



BTW, FWIW, I don't work for Ignite, nor do I 

Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

2016-04-04 Thread Jaime Solorza
For sure
On Apr 4, 2016 4:31 PM, "Faisal Imtiaz"  wrote:

>  I often tell my wife
>
> If the women of the world stopped buying shoes and clothes for 3 months,
> there will be a total world wide economic collapse !
>
>
> :)
>
> Faisal Imtiaz
> Snappy Internet & Telecom
> 7266 SW 48 Street
> Miami, FL 33155
> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
>
> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
>
> --
>
> *From: *"Jaime Solorza" 
> *To: *"Animal Farm" 
> *Sent: *Monday, April 4, 2016 3:58:01 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
>
> Ha
> On Apr 4, 2016 1:53 PM, "Chuck McCown"  wrote:
>
>> I told my wife this morning that I am going to have to find a rehab
>> center for an Amazon addict.
>>
>> *From:* Jaime Solorza 
>> *Sent:* Monday, April 04, 2016 1:47 PM
>> *To:* Animal Farm 
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
>>
>>
>> My wife always complains that I don't need more tools   I respond... when
>> you stop buying shoes, I will stop buying tools...she gives me the death
>> stare.
>> On Apr 4, 2016 1:44 PM, "Faisal Imtiaz"  wrote:
>>
>>> Chuck, somehow you remind me of my business partner who goes looking
>>> for projects, cause they are a perfect opportunity to collect (buy) more
>>> tools... one can never have enough tools !
>>>
>>> (He is more into power tools, construction, mechanical etc ...)
>>>
>>> :)
>>>
>>> Faisal Imtiaz
>>> Snappy Internet & Telecom
>>> 7266 SW 48 Street
>>> Miami, FL 33155
>>> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
>>>
>>> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> *From: *"Chuck McCown" 
>>> *To: *af@afmug.com
>>> *Sent: *Monday, April 4, 2016 3:36:59 PM
>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
>>>
>>> I just tested a cable tester from Ideal that qualifies GigE circuits.
>>>
>>> Nice thing is, it will do a data test without cable continuity.
>>> (It also does the actual cable continuity tests too).
>>>
>>> I wonder what it would show on a less than 1Gbps radio.  $1325
>>>
>>> *From:* Harold Bledsoe 
>>> *Sent:* Monday, April 04, 2016 1:32 PM
>>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
>>>
>>> Sorry to be late to the party.  ;-)
>>>
>>> I have a few comments on iperf though.  Iperf2 is not very reliable at
>>> high speeds.  For high speeds, iperf3 tends to do a little better assuming
>>> you have enough computer to push the required speeds.  However iperf3
>>> cannot yet do bi-di tests.
>>>
>>> For affordable testing, we've found Mikrotik's traffic generator to be
>>> pretty good.  It's a little complicated to setup the first time but then it
>>> is better.  Beware using btest - it uses a single core and can't keep up
>>> especially if you try random data.
>>>
>>> Then there's RFC testers like Exfo, Smartbits, etc.  We use Smartbits.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> -Hal
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 9:15 AM Stefan Englhardt  wrote:
>>>
 Every new gear is suspicious in regards of holding up to the promises
 made.



 We’ve heard so many promises in the past and very often the truth does
 not meet marketing.



 So there is nothing aggressive if someone wants to see iperf testing.
 Seeing is believing.





 *Von:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *Im Auftrag von *Ken Hohhof
 *Gesendet:* Montag, 4. April 2016 15:08
 *An:* af@afmug.com
 *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?




 By comparison to the presidential contest, the tone was very mild!  Did
 you see Jimmy Kimmel’s American Girl & Boy Dolls Presidential Collection?

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded=FYHPr7TL2AY



 *From:* Faisal Imtiaz 

 *Sent:* Monday, April 04, 2016 8:03 AM

 *To:* af@afmug.com

 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?



 I am not being defensive about Ignite, as I stated in my email I am
 having a reaction to the tone of your question. If you were to look at my
 posts you will also see that I have expressed similar feelings to others in
 regards to how they ask the question... irrespective of who they are asking
 about.  I also apologized for this being a personality defect in myself.



 The Cut & Paste was not for your benefit, but for others who lurk in
 the forums.



 There is nothing wrong with running an iperf test.. but you
 specifically asked for the test to be run in a very particular way, from
 very particular pieces of equipment.



 My apologies if I 

Re: [AFMUG] PSA - check your generators!

2016-04-04 Thread Mathew Howard
We actually have one of those in town here too... I think it's 110 octane,
unfortunately, I've never had a use for it :P

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Robert Andrews 
wrote:

> We have a station here in Reno that sells 110 and 114 Octane racing fuel
> at the pump...   Vro  And $$
>
> On 04/04/2016 11:14 AM, Mathew Howard wrote:
>
>> We have quite a few stations up here that sell ethanol free gas...
>> mostly 91 octane, but a few have 87 too... of course you pay quite a bit
>> extra for it.
>>
>> On Apr 4, 2016 1:10 PM, "George Skorup" > > wrote:
>>
>> Not in the midwest. All blends are E10.
>>
>> On 4/4/2016 12:55 PM, Adam Moffett wrote:
>>
>>> Yeah anywhere where boating or motor sports are popular you might
>>> find ethanol free.
>>> I also seem to think the higher octane fuels won't have ethanol,
>>> but I can't remember why I think that.
>>>
>>> On 4/4/2016 1:51 PM, George Skorup wrote:
>>>
 Yup. If you have a marina near you, they will most likely have
 ethanol-free gas. You'll pay a little bit more for it though. We
 keep a couple cheap gas inverter generators around for spares,
 but we primarily use the Yamaha w/ propane.

 My truck is apparently so carbon'd up that I cannot run the
 E10/87 (87 octane my ass) without knocking and the PCM retarding
 the timing. I'm running some Shell Nitro with extra detergent
 added to try to clean it up. If I could find some of the old GM
 Top Engine Cleaner, I'd do that, but the EPA banned it. So they
 give us shit gas and no means to clean it. There's nowhere near
 enough detergent in any of the regular gasolines. I'm not pulling
 the heads to clean the cylinders, F that. I did find out that my
 truck shuts down at 98MPH too. Lame.

 On 4/4/2016 12:21 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:

>
> The labels say no ethanol!
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340 
> Direct: 937-552-2343 
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Apr 4, 2016 12:57 PM, "George Skorup"  > wrote:
>
> We've started our little Yamaha on a 20# tank at -15F
> before. It can be a bitch to get started because of the
> protection valves in tanks now. We had one old tank without
> the valve and it would fire up on the first pull every time.
> Now it takes 5-6 pulls using the choke to get that valve open.
>
> One thing I found out with all of my truck woes and shit
> gasoline is that small/carb engines were never designed to
> run the ethanol blends. The ethanol is corrosive to
> non-stainless fuel systems. This is why all FlexFuel
> certified systems are stainless delivery, injector rails, etc.
>
> On 4/4/2016 8:22 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:
>
> Yeah, I have run lots of propane generators.  Here are a
> few problems.
>
> Temperature.  If it is -20F outside, you have to have a
> very very large tank to generate enough vapor to keep
> the generator running.
>
> Conversely you can use a liquid pickup and a vaporizer
> but you need heat energy for the vaporizer to get the
> thing started.
>
> And liquid pickups also pick all the dirt and sludge at
> the bottom of the tank.  You would not believe the
> amount of gunk in those tanks (I cut old ones up for
> smokers).
>
> And no matter what kind of fuel you use, the starter
> motor battery is a common point of failure as is
> charger.  I like to remote the battery into the heated
> building if there is a heated building. Generac was
> infamous for supplying a charger that failed and you
> didn't know until you needed.
>
> I started putting telemetry on all starter motor
> batteries on all generators.  That is the most important
> bit of data you need to monitor.
>
> -Original Message- From: George Skorup
> Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2016 9:43 PM
> To: af@afmug.com 
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PSA - check your generators!
>
> Propane
>
> On 4/3/2016 7:09 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>
> I've had a handful of generators that always started
> on the first pull. Until today.  Got another one for
> the site 

Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

2016-04-04 Thread Faisal Imtiaz
I often tell my wife 

If the women of the world stopped buying shoes and clothes for 3 months, there 
will be a total world wide economic collapse ! 

:) 

Faisal Imtiaz 
Snappy Internet & Telecom 
7266 SW 48 Street 
Miami, FL 33155 
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 

Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net 

> From: "Jaime Solorza" 
> To: "Animal Farm" 
> Sent: Monday, April 4, 2016 3:58:01 PM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

> Ha
> On Apr 4, 2016 1:53 PM, "Chuck McCown" < ch...@wbmfg.com > wrote:

>> I told my wife this morning that I am going to have to find a rehab center 
>> for
>> an Amazon addict.
>> From: Jaime Solorza
>> Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 1:47 PM
>> To: Animal Farm
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

>> My wife always complains that I don't need more tools I respond... when you 
>> stop
>> buying shoes, I will stop buying tools...she gives me the death stare.
>> On Apr 4, 2016 1:44 PM, "Faisal Imtiaz" < fai...@snappytelecom.net > wrote:

>>> Chuck, somehow you remind me of my business partner who goes looking for
>>> projects, cause they are a perfect opportunity to collect (buy) more 
>>> tools...
>>> one can never have enough tools !
>>> (He is more into power tools, construction, mechanical etc ...)
>>> :)
>>> Faisal Imtiaz
>>> Snappy Internet & Telecom
>>> 7266 SW 48 Street
>>> Miami, FL 33155
>>> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

>>> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net

 From: "Chuck McCown" < ch...@wbmfg.com >
 To: af@afmug.com
 Sent: Monday, April 4, 2016 3:36:59 PM
 Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

 I just tested a cable tester from Ideal that qualifies GigE circuits.
 Nice thing is, it will do a data test without cable continuity.
 (It also does the actual cable continuity tests too).
 I wonder what it would show on a less than 1Gbps radio. $1325
 From: Harold Bledsoe
 Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 1:32 PM
 To: af@afmug.com
 Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
 Sorry to be late to the party. ;-)
 I have a few comments on iperf though. Iperf2 is not very reliable at high
 speeds. For high speeds, iperf3 tends to do a little better assuming you 
 have
 enough computer to push the required speeds. However iperf3 cannot yet do 
 bi-di
 tests.
 For affordable testing, we've found Mikrotik's traffic generator to be 
 pretty
 good. It's a little complicated to setup the first time but then it is 
 better.
 Beware using btest - it uses a single core and can't keep up especially if 
 you
 try random data.
 Then there's RFC testers like Exfo, Smartbits, etc. We use Smartbits.
 Thanks,
 -Hal
 On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 9:15 AM Stefan Englhardt < s...@genias.net > wrote:

> Every new gear is suspicious in regards of holding up to the promises 
> made.

> We’ve heard so many promises in the past and very often the truth does 
> not meet
> marketing.

> So there is nothing aggressive if someone wants to see iperf testing. 
> Seeing is
> believing.

> Von: Af [mailto: af-boun...@afmug.com ] Im Auftrag von Ken Hohhof
> Gesendet: Montag, 4. April 2016 15:08
> An: af@afmug.com
> Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

> By comparison to the presidential contest, the tone was very mild! Did 
> you see
> Jimmy Kimmel’s American Girl & Boy Dolls Presidential Collection?

> https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded=FYHPr7TL2AY

> From: Faisal Imtiaz

> Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 8:03 AM

> To: af@afmug.com

> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

> I am not being defensive about Ignite, as I stated in my email I am 
> having a
> reaction to the tone of your question. If you were to look at my posts 
> you will
> also see that I have expressed similar feelings to others in regards to 
> how
> they ask the question... irrespective of who they are asking about. I also
> apologized for this being a personality defect in myself.

> The Cut & Paste was not for your benefit, but for others who lurk in the 
> forums.

> There is nothing wrong with running an iperf test.. but you specifically 
> asked
> for the test to be run in a very particular way, from very particular 
> pieces of
> equipment.

> My apologies if I am over reacting WISP's have many many great 
> attributes,
> however there is one attribute which would be nice to change for the 
> better
> Our Attitudes towards the mfg. and the default presumption of a 
> 'conspiracy' or
> 'they are trying to pull a fast one on us'. along with it also having
> enough fortitude to asking the MFG and or their 

Re: [AFMUG] New installer tool for tree problems

2016-04-04 Thread Mathew Howard
yeah, there didn't appear to be any mechanism to rotate it, and all of
those shots would be easily faked... that was pretty awesome how easily
those balloons took it down though.

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 4:08 PM, James Howard  wrote:

> Looked to me that they faked the parts where the saw was actually
> cutting.  I doubt that crappy McCulloch chainsaw would run very long upside
> down anyway but every time they show it cutting anything the bar was
> cutting horizontal and it was always vertical when they showed shots from
> the other drone or the ground? Didn’t look like it was setup to rotate the
> chainsaw sideways and the only stuff I could see attached to the chainsaw
> was the camera on the front of it, nothing to run the throttle.
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Robert Andrews
> *Sent:* Monday, April 04, 2016 2:55 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] New installer tool for tree problems
>
>
>
> Makes you realize how easy it is to get rid of that pesky drone that
> keeps showing up over your back yard. A bag of 10 cent balloons, a
> tank of helium and a roll of kite string... Instant barrage balloons
> protection..
>
> On 04/04/2016 12:18 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
> > LOL :)
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Jaime Solorza <
> losguyswirel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Balloon 1 Drone 0
> >>
> >> On Apr 4, 2016 1:03 PM, "Randy Cosby"  wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> http://video.dailymail.co.uk/video/mol/2016/04/03/8869074933904817371/640x360_8869074933904817371.mp4
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Randy Cosby
> >>>
> >>> Vice President
> >>>
> >>> InfoWest, Inc
> >>>
> >>> 435-674-0165
> >>>
> >>>
> >
>
> --
>
> *Total Control Panel*
>
> Login 
>
> To: ja...@litewire.net
> 
>
> From:
> 01000153e2d7e913-0aeeca62-4a7e-4eef-b733-b13c1b4f802e-000...@amazonses.com
>
> Remove
> 
> amazonses.com from my allow list
>
> *You received this message because the domain amazonses.com
>  is on your allow list.*
>
>
>


Re: [AFMUG] OT ....too funny Construction Worker Hangs Mexican Flag From Trump Tower in Canada | TIME

2016-04-04 Thread Jaime Solorza
Ha
On Apr 4, 2016 4:03 PM, "Lewis Bergman"  wrote:

> Haven't you heard? Trump loves the Mexicans, and the Evangelicals, and the
> Mormons, and I guess this week the Cheeseheads.
>
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 4:04 PM Jaime Solorza 
> wrote:
>
>> http://time.com/4281370/trump-tower-mexican-flag-canada/
>>
>


Re: [AFMUG] OT ....too funny Construction Worker Hangs Mexican Flag From Trump Tower in Canada | TIME

2016-04-04 Thread Lewis Bergman
Haven't you heard? Trump loves the Mexicans, and the Evangelicals, and the
Mormons, and I guess this week the Cheeseheads.

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 4:04 PM Jaime Solorza 
wrote:

> http://time.com/4281370/trump-tower-mexican-flag-canada/
>


Re: [AFMUG] New installer tool for tree problems

2016-04-04 Thread Chuck McCown
Did you see the drone with the handgun.  That could be a serious threat.  
Imagine if the mob or a drug cartel was after you.  You hear a buzzing, bang 
bang, and it flies away.  No witness, no gun, perhaps nobody even around if the 
drone followed the target for a while.  

From: James Howard 
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 3:08 PM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] New installer tool for tree problems

Looked to me that they faked the parts where the saw was actually cutting.  I 
doubt that crappy McCulloch chainsaw would run very long upside down anyway but 
every time they show it cutting anything the bar was cutting horizontal and it 
was always vertical when they showed shots from the other drone or the ground? 
Didn’t look like it was setup to rotate the chainsaw sideways and the only 
stuff I could see attached to the chainsaw was the camera on the front of it, 
nothing to run the throttle. 

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Robert Andrews
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 2:55 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] New installer tool for tree problems

 

Makes you realize how easy it is to get rid of that pesky drone that 
keeps showing up over your back yard. A bag of 10 cent balloons, a 
tank of helium and a roll of kite string... Instant barrage balloons 
protection..

On 04/04/2016 12:18 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
> LOL :)
>
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Jaime Solorza 
> > Balloon 1 Drone 0
>>
>> On Apr 4, 2016 1:03 PM, "Randy Cosby" >>
>>>
>>> http://video.dailymail.co.uk/video/mol/2016/04/03/8869074933904817371/640x360_8869074933904817371.mp4
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Randy Cosby
>>>
>>> Vice President
>>>
>>> InfoWest, Inc
>>>
>>> 435-674-0165
>>>
>>>
>






Total Control Panel
   Login
   
 
  To: ja...@litewire.net
 
  From: 
01000153e2d7e913-0aeeca62-4a7e-4eef-b733-b13c1b4f802e-000...@amazonses.com
 
   Remove amazonses.com from my allow list
 
   
 
You received this message because the domain amazonses.com is on 
your allow list.
   
 

 


[AFMUG] OT ....too funny Construction Worker Hangs Mexican Flag From Trump Tower in Canada | TIME

2016-04-04 Thread Jaime Solorza
http://time.com/4281370/trump-tower-mexican-flag-canada/


Re: [AFMUG] OT TSLA

2016-04-04 Thread That One Guy /sarcasm
I have some keyon ill let go in trade chuck, i think theyre going to make a
comeback, its a really good risk

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 3:30 PM, Robert Andrews 
wrote:

> Buy and hold stocks with Dividends...   This one is in the high risk
> category and should be on your "play" list...  But what do I know, I still
> have a share of Netscape...
>
> On 04/04/2016 01:03 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:
>
>> Yeah, let me know before that happens will ya?
>>
>> I am wanting this to be a buy an hold stock.  Do I have the guts for
>> that
>>
>> -Original Message- From: Robert Andrews
>> Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 2:01 PM
>> To: af@afmug.com
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT TSLA
>>
>> When it goes down...
>>
>> On 04/04/2016 12:33 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:
>>
>>> UP 18% since I bought.  Wonder when I should sell
>>>
>>
>>


-- 
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as
part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.


Re: [AFMUG] OT TSLA

2016-04-04 Thread Robert Andrews
Buy and hold stocks with Dividends...   This one is in the high risk 
category and should be on your "play" list...  But what do I know, I 
still have a share of Netscape...


On 04/04/2016 01:03 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:

Yeah, let me know before that happens will ya?

I am wanting this to be a buy an hold stock.  Do I have the guts for
that

-Original Message- From: Robert Andrews
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 2:01 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT TSLA

When it goes down...

On 04/04/2016 12:33 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:

UP 18% since I bought.  Wonder when I should sell




Re: [AFMUG] PSA - check your generators!

2016-04-04 Thread Ken Hohhof
I remember filling up with Sunoco 260 around 1970 for less than 25 cents per 
gallon - plus S Green Stamps!  I remember it as being 100 octane, but 
Wikipedia says more like 97 octane.



-Original Message- 
From: Robert Andrews

Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 2:46 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PSA - check your generators!

We have a station here in Reno that sells 110 and 114 Octane racing fuel
at the pump...   Vro  And $$

On 04/04/2016 11:14 AM, Mathew Howard wrote:

We have quite a few stations up here that sell ethanol free gas...
mostly 91 octane, but a few have 87 too... of course you pay quite a bit
extra for it.

On Apr 4, 2016 1:10 PM, "George Skorup" > wrote:

Not in the midwest. All blends are E10.

On 4/4/2016 12:55 PM, Adam Moffett wrote:

Yeah anywhere where boating or motor sports are popular you might
find ethanol free.
I also seem to think the higher octane fuels won't have ethanol,
but I can't remember why I think that.

On 4/4/2016 1:51 PM, George Skorup wrote:

Yup. If you have a marina near you, they will most likely have
ethanol-free gas. You'll pay a little bit more for it though. We
keep a couple cheap gas inverter generators around for spares,
but we primarily use the Yamaha w/ propane.

My truck is apparently so carbon'd up that I cannot run the
E10/87 (87 octane my ass) without knocking and the PCM retarding
the timing. I'm running some Shell Nitro with extra detergent
added to try to clean it up. If I could find some of the old GM
Top Engine Cleaner, I'd do that, but the EPA banned it. So they
give us shit gas and no means to clean it. There's nowhere near
enough detergent in any of the regular gasolines. I'm not pulling
the heads to clean the cylinders, F that. I did find out that my
truck shuts down at 98MPH too. Lame.

On 4/4/2016 12:21 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:


The labels say no ethanol!

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Apr 4, 2016 12:57 PM, "George Skorup" > wrote:

We've started our little Yamaha on a 20# tank at -15F
before. It can be a bitch to get started because of the
protection valves in tanks now. We had one old tank without
the valve and it would fire up on the first pull every time.
Now it takes 5-6 pulls using the choke to get that valve open.

One thing I found out with all of my truck woes and shit
gasoline is that small/carb engines were never designed to
run the ethanol blends. The ethanol is corrosive to
non-stainless fuel systems. This is why all FlexFuel
certified systems are stainless delivery, injector rails, etc.

On 4/4/2016 8:22 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:

Yeah, I have run lots of propane generators.  Here are a
few problems.

Temperature.  If it is -20F outside, you have to have a
very very large tank to generate enough vapor to keep
the generator running.

Conversely you can use a liquid pickup and a vaporizer
but you need heat energy for the vaporizer to get the
thing started.

And liquid pickups also pick all the dirt and sludge at
the bottom of the tank.  You would not believe the
amount of gunk in those tanks (I cut old ones up for
smokers).

And no matter what kind of fuel you use, the starter
motor battery is a common point of failure as is
charger.  I like to remote the battery into the heated
building if there is a heated building. Generac was
infamous for supplying a charger that failed and you
didn't know until you needed.

I started putting telemetry on all starter motor
batteries on all generators.  That is the most important
bit of data you need to monitor.

-Original Message- From: George Skorup
Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2016 9:43 PM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PSA - check your generators!

Propane

On 4/3/2016 7:09 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:

I've had a handful of generators that always started
on the first pull. Until today.  Got another one for
the site but started tearing apart the old one and I
think it's a bad carb, something I'll have someone
else take a look at.

Mine are all sitting inside doing nothing, they're
portable with two wheels but require two people or a
ramp to put in the truck.  I don't know if I'd buy
these size units 

Re: [AFMUG] PSA - check your generators!

2016-04-04 Thread Robert Andrews
Wow, Ethanol for free...  Got to convert those generators   ( yeah I 
got what he meant, but it was right there for the taking...


On 04/04/2016 01:21 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:

I would have thought it would be 3.2% like your “beer”.
*From:* Chuck McCown 
*Sent:* Monday, April 04, 2016 12:52 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com 
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PSA - check your generators!
In Utah, one of our larger gas station chains sells ethanol free at the
pump.
*From:* George Skorup 
*Sent:* Monday, April 04, 2016 11:51 AM
*To:* af@afmug.com 
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PSA - check your generators!
Yup. If you have a marina near you, they will most likely have
ethanol-free gas. You'll pay a little bit more for it though. We keep a
couple cheap gas inverter generators around for spares, but we primarily
use the Yamaha w/ propane.

My truck is apparently so carbon'd up that I cannot run the E10/87 (87
octane my ass) without knocking and the PCM retarding the timing. I'm
running some Shell Nitro with extra detergent added to try to clean it
up. If I could find some of the old GM Top Engine Cleaner, I'd do that,
but the EPA banned it. So they give us shit gas and no means to clean
it. There's nowhere near enough detergent in any of the regular
gasolines. I'm not pulling the heads to clean the cylinders, F that. I
did find out that my truck shuts down at 98MPH too. Lame.

On 4/4/2016 12:21 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:


The labels say no ethanol!

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Apr 4, 2016 12:57 PM, "George Skorup" > wrote:

We've started our little Yamaha on a 20# tank at -15F before. It
can be a bitch to get started because of the protection valves in
tanks now. We had one old tank without the valve and it would fire
up on the first pull every time. Now it takes 5-6 pulls using the
choke to get that valve open.

One thing I found out with all of my truck woes and shit gasoline
is that small/carb engines were never designed to run the ethanol
blends. The ethanol is corrosive to non-stainless fuel systems.
This is why all FlexFuel certified systems are stainless delivery,
injector rails, etc.

On 4/4/2016 8:22 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:

Yeah, I have run lots of propane generators.  Here are a few
problems.

Temperature.  If it is -20F outside, you have to have a very
very large tank to generate enough vapor to keep the generator
running.

Conversely you can use a liquid pickup and a vaporizer but you
need heat energy for the vaporizer to get the thing started.

And liquid pickups also pick all the dirt and sludge at the
bottom of the tank.  You would not believe the amount of gunk
in those tanks (I cut old ones up for smokers).

And no matter what kind of fuel you use, the starter motor
battery is a common point of failure as is charger.  I like to
remote the battery into the heated building if there is a
heated building. Generac was infamous for supplying a charger
that failed and you didn't know until you needed.

I started putting telemetry on all starter motor batteries on
all generators.  That is the most important bit of data you
need to monitor.

-Original Message- From: George Skorup
Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2016 9:43 PM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PSA - check your generators!

Propane

On 4/3/2016 7:09 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:

I've had a handful of generators that always started on
the first pull. Until today.  Got another one for the site
but started tearing apart the old one and I think it's a
bad carb, something I'll have someone else take a look at.

Mine are all sitting inside doing nothing, they're
portable with two wheels but require two people or a ramp
to put in the truck.  I don't know if I'd buy these size
units again but I really do like the 8.5 gallons and 24
hour run time...

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373







Re: [AFMUG] PSA - check your generators!

2016-04-04 Thread Chuck McCown
Hey, it is 4.0% ABV...

From: Ken Hohhof 
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 2:21 PM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PSA - check your generators!

I would have thought it would be 3.2% like your “beer”.

From: Chuck McCown 
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 12:52 PM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PSA - check your generators!

In Utah, one of our larger gas station chains sells ethanol free at the pump.  

From: George Skorup 
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 11:51 AM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PSA - check your generators!

Yup. If you have a marina near you, they will most likely have ethanol-free 
gas. You'll pay a little bit more for it though. We keep a couple cheap gas 
inverter generators around for spares, but we primarily use the Yamaha w/ 
propane.

My truck is apparently so carbon'd up that I cannot run the E10/87 (87 octane 
my ass) without knocking and the PCM retarding the timing. I'm running some 
Shell Nitro with extra detergent added to try to clean it up. If I could find 
some of the old GM Top Engine Cleaner, I'd do that, but the EPA banned it. So 
they give us shit gas and no means to clean it. There's nowhere near enough 
detergent in any of the regular gasolines. I'm not pulling the heads to clean 
the cylinders, F that. I did find out that my truck shuts down at 98MPH too. 
Lame.


On 4/4/2016 12:21 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:

  The labels say no ethanol!

  Josh Luthman
  Office: 937-552-2340
  Direct: 937-552-2343
  1100 Wayne St
  Suite 1337
  Troy, OH 45373

  On Apr 4, 2016 12:57 PM, "George Skorup"  wrote:

We've started our little Yamaha on a 20# tank at -15F before. It can be a 
bitch to get started because of the protection valves in tanks now. We had one 
old tank without the valve and it would fire up on the first pull every time. 
Now it takes 5-6 pulls using the choke to get that valve open.

One thing I found out with all of my truck woes and shit gasoline is that 
small/carb engines were never designed to run the ethanol blends. The ethanol 
is corrosive to non-stainless fuel systems. This is why all FlexFuel certified 
systems are stainless delivery, injector rails, etc.

On 4/4/2016 8:22 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:

  Yeah, I have run lots of propane generators.  Here are a few problems.

  Temperature.  If it is -20F outside, you have to have a very very large 
tank to generate enough vapor to keep the generator running.

  Conversely you can use a liquid pickup and a vaporizer but you need heat 
energy for the vaporizer to get the thing started.

  And liquid pickups also pick all the dirt and sludge at the bottom of the 
tank.  You would not believe the amount of gunk in those tanks (I cut old ones 
up for smokers).

  And no matter what kind of fuel you use, the starter motor battery is a 
common point of failure as is charger.  I like to remote the battery into the 
heated building if there is a heated building. Generac was infamous for 
supplying a charger that failed and you didn't know until you needed.

  I started putting telemetry on all starter motor batteries on all 
generators.  That is the most important bit of data you need to monitor.

  -Original Message- From: George Skorup
  Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2016 9:43 PM
  To: af@afmug.com
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PSA - check your generators!

  Propane

  On 4/3/2016 7:09 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:

I've had a handful of generators that always started on the first pull. 
Until today.  Got another one for the site but started tearing apart the old 
one and I think it's a bad carb, something I'll have someone else take a look 
at.

Mine are all sitting inside doing nothing, they're portable with two 
wheels but require two people or a ramp to put in the truck.  I don't know if 
I'd buy these size units again but I really do like the 8.5 gallons and 24 hour 
run time...

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373








Re: [AFMUG] PSA - check your generators!

2016-04-04 Thread Ken Hohhof
I would have thought it would be 3.2% like your “beer”.

From: Chuck McCown 
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 12:52 PM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PSA - check your generators!

In Utah, one of our larger gas station chains sells ethanol free at the pump.  

From: George Skorup 
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 11:51 AM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PSA - check your generators!

Yup. If you have a marina near you, they will most likely have ethanol-free 
gas. You'll pay a little bit more for it though. We keep a couple cheap gas 
inverter generators around for spares, but we primarily use the Yamaha w/ 
propane.

My truck is apparently so carbon'd up that I cannot run the E10/87 (87 octane 
my ass) without knocking and the PCM retarding the timing. I'm running some 
Shell Nitro with extra detergent added to try to clean it up. If I could find 
some of the old GM Top Engine Cleaner, I'd do that, but the EPA banned it. So 
they give us shit gas and no means to clean it. There's nowhere near enough 
detergent in any of the regular gasolines. I'm not pulling the heads to clean 
the cylinders, F that. I did find out that my truck shuts down at 98MPH too. 
Lame.


On 4/4/2016 12:21 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:

  The labels say no ethanol!

  Josh Luthman
  Office: 937-552-2340
  Direct: 937-552-2343
  1100 Wayne St
  Suite 1337
  Troy, OH 45373

  On Apr 4, 2016 12:57 PM, "George Skorup"  wrote:

We've started our little Yamaha on a 20# tank at -15F before. It can be a 
bitch to get started because of the protection valves in tanks now. We had one 
old tank without the valve and it would fire up on the first pull every time. 
Now it takes 5-6 pulls using the choke to get that valve open.

One thing I found out with all of my truck woes and shit gasoline is that 
small/carb engines were never designed to run the ethanol blends. The ethanol 
is corrosive to non-stainless fuel systems. This is why all FlexFuel certified 
systems are stainless delivery, injector rails, etc.

On 4/4/2016 8:22 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:

  Yeah, I have run lots of propane generators.  Here are a few problems.

  Temperature.  If it is -20F outside, you have to have a very very large 
tank to generate enough vapor to keep the generator running.

  Conversely you can use a liquid pickup and a vaporizer but you need heat 
energy for the vaporizer to get the thing started.

  And liquid pickups also pick all the dirt and sludge at the bottom of the 
tank.  You would not believe the amount of gunk in those tanks (I cut old ones 
up for smokers).

  And no matter what kind of fuel you use, the starter motor battery is a 
common point of failure as is charger.  I like to remote the battery into the 
heated building if there is a heated building. Generac was infamous for 
supplying a charger that failed and you didn't know until you needed.

  I started putting telemetry on all starter motor batteries on all 
generators.  That is the most important bit of data you need to monitor.

  -Original Message- From: George Skorup
  Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2016 9:43 PM
  To: af@afmug.com
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PSA - check your generators!

  Propane

  On 4/3/2016 7:09 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:

I've had a handful of generators that always started on the first pull. 
Until today.  Got another one for the site but started tearing apart the old 
one and I think it's a bad carb, something I'll have someone else take a look 
at.

Mine are all sitting inside doing nothing, they're portable with two 
wheels but require two people or a ramp to put in the truck.  I don't know if 
I'd buy these size units again but I really do like the 8.5 gallons and 24 hour 
run time...

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373








Re: [AFMUG] OT TSLA

2016-04-04 Thread Jaime Solorza
Buy low...sell high.  That will be 500.00 consulting fee.
On Apr 4, 2016 2:10 PM, "Robert Andrews"  wrote:

> This is a Silly Valley Darling..Watch what happens in Sillycon Valley
> and when the shit hits the fan there in a big way, those people holding
> this up will be looking for things to sell and this will be one of them...
>  Now the question is when is the shit going to hit the fan in Sillcon's
> Valley...?
>
> On 04/04/2016 01:06 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>
>> He's right.  When it goes down.
>>
>> It'll climb and climb and climb, then fall.  If you sell at the first
>> climb you lost out on the second climb's margins.
>>
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Josh Reynolds > > wrote:
>>
>> No no no.
>>
>> BEFORE it goes down! :)
>>
>> On Apr 4, 2016 3:01 PM, "Robert Andrews" > > wrote:
>>
>> When it goes down...
>>
>> On 04/04/2016 12:33 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:
>>
>> UP 18% since I bought.  Wonder when I should sell
>>
>>
>>


Re: [AFMUG] OT TSLA

2016-04-04 Thread Robert Andrews
This is a Silly Valley Darling..Watch what happens in Sillycon 
Valley and when the shit hits the fan there in a big way, those people 
holding this up will be looking for things to sell and this will be one 
of them...   Now the question is when is the shit going to hit the fan 
in Sillcon's Valley...?


On 04/04/2016 01:06 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:

He's right.  When it goes down.

It'll climb and climb and climb, then fall.  If you sell at the first
climb you lost out on the second climb's margins.


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Josh Reynolds > wrote:

No no no.

BEFORE it goes down! :)

On Apr 4, 2016 3:01 PM, "Robert Andrews" > wrote:

When it goes down...

On 04/04/2016 12:33 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:

UP 18% since I bought.  Wonder when I should sell




Re: [AFMUG] OT TSLA

2016-04-04 Thread Josh Luthman
He's right.  When it goes down.

It'll climb and climb and climb, then fall.  If you sell at the first climb
you lost out on the second climb's margins.


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Josh Reynolds  wrote:

> No no no.
>
> BEFORE it goes down! :)
> On Apr 4, 2016 3:01 PM, "Robert Andrews"  wrote:
>
>> When it goes down...
>>
>> On 04/04/2016 12:33 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:
>>
>>> UP 18% since I bought.  Wonder when I should sell
>>>
>>


Re: [AFMUG] OT TSLA

2016-04-04 Thread Josh Reynolds
No no no.

BEFORE it goes down! :)
On Apr 4, 2016 3:01 PM, "Robert Andrews"  wrote:

> When it goes down...
>
> On 04/04/2016 12:33 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:
>
>> UP 18% since I bought.  Wonder when I should sell
>>
>


Re: [AFMUG] OT TSLA

2016-04-04 Thread Chuck McCown

Yeah, let me know before that happens will ya?

I am wanting this to be a buy an hold stock.  Do I have the guts for 
that


-Original Message- 
From: Robert Andrews

Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 2:01 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT TSLA

When it goes down...

On 04/04/2016 12:33 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:
UP 18% since I bought.  Wonder when I should sell 




Re: [AFMUG] OT TSLA

2016-04-04 Thread Robert Andrews

When it goes down...

On 04/04/2016 12:33 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:

UP 18% since I bought.  Wonder when I should sell


Re: [AFMUG] OT: 3D Printer

2016-04-04 Thread Robert Andrews
D'oh,   I hate posting before the coffee has kicked in.   Yep 
Tinkercad.comThe Q design site...   Midnight engineering at it's 
finest!




On 04/04/2016 12:32 PM, Sam Lambie wrote:

More likely https://www.tinkercad.com

As the tinkerbots is a kids toy. Maybe you just like sounding smart, but
really you just like to play with tractors in your living room?

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Sam Lambie > wrote:

www.tinkerbots.com 

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Robert Andrews
> wrote:

Printrbot Metal has been good for me, I even got all in for less
than $500, as I bought during a sale.   Do NOT go the build it
yourself route to save a few $$.   I am using it quite a bit.  I
build mounts for circuit boards for custom UPS/24V power
supplies we use with full reporting.   I've built custom mounts
for small radios and adapters for mounting routerboards.   I
build a lot of parts for G scale trains.   I like being able to
iterate a design without having any delays.   I have learned
about rotating parts to get better finishes on the sides that
are important ( the vertical side on the print stage tends to be
finer ).   I am probably going to go for a more expensive
printer in the next few months to increase my build size to
10".   So far I am just using tinkerbot.com
 as my design software as my designs are
fairly basic.  The learning curve is just about vertical...  It
can be frustrating. Getting things set up and keeping them set
up is sometimes art as much as science.  But there is a ton of
help out there.   But it is not a dip a toe in thing, you have
to put 20-50 hours of learning in.

On 04/04/2016 08:49 AM, Jeremy wrote:

I think Monoprice has a cheap one also.  I have no
experience with them.

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Chuck McCown

>> wrote:

 I sold mine.  It was a very large Stratsys system.
 They are slow.  Normally the whole thing is heated.
 ABS is very common.  But no matter what, it will not be
as strong as
 a molded piece.
 They are good for a proof of concept thing.  A few
times I used them
 as a pattern for cast metal parts.
 Or as a physical somewhat working protytpe to check a
design before
 I had a hard mold made for injection molding.
 I think I would spend as little as possible if I was
going to get
 one to just play around with.  Makerbot is pretty cheap
I think.  I
 believe Walmart sells one.
 *From:* Matt >
 *Sent:* Monday, April 04, 2016 9:33 AM
 *To:* af@afmug.com 
>
 *Subject:* [AFMUG] OT: 3D Printer
 Anyone here using a 3D printer?  Looking to get one to
play with.
 Any recommendations?  Would like to get a stand alone
one so the PC
 does not have to run for whole print. Heard ABS plastic
requires a
 heated platter? Heard ABS prints are more durable and
heat resistant?





--
--
*Sam Lambie*
Taosnet Wireless Tech.
575-758-7598  Office
www.Taosnet.com 




--
--
*Sam Lambie*
Taosnet Wireless Tech.
575-758-7598 Office
www.Taosnet.com 


Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

2016-04-04 Thread Jaime Solorza
Ha
On Apr 4, 2016 1:53 PM, "Chuck McCown"  wrote:

> I told my wife this morning that I am going to have to find a rehab center
> for an Amazon addict.
>
> *From:* Jaime Solorza 
> *Sent:* Monday, April 04, 2016 1:47 PM
> *To:* Animal Farm 
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
>
>
> My wife always complains that I don't need more tools   I respond... when
> you stop buying shoes, I will stop buying tools...she gives me the death
> stare.
> On Apr 4, 2016 1:44 PM, "Faisal Imtiaz"  wrote:
>
>> Chuck, somehow you remind me of my business partner who goes looking
>> for projects, cause they are a perfect opportunity to collect (buy) more
>> tools... one can never have enough tools !
>>
>> (He is more into power tools, construction, mechanical etc ...)
>>
>> :)
>>
>> Faisal Imtiaz
>> Snappy Internet & Telecom
>> 7266 SW 48 Street
>> Miami, FL 33155
>> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
>>
>> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
>>
>> --
>>
>> *From: *"Chuck McCown" 
>> *To: *af@afmug.com
>> *Sent: *Monday, April 4, 2016 3:36:59 PM
>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
>>
>> I just tested a cable tester from Ideal that qualifies GigE circuits.
>>
>> Nice thing is, it will do a data test without cable continuity.
>> (It also does the actual cable continuity tests too).
>>
>> I wonder what it would show on a less than 1Gbps radio.  $1325
>>
>> *From:* Harold Bledsoe 
>> *Sent:* Monday, April 04, 2016 1:32 PM
>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
>>
>> Sorry to be late to the party.  ;-)
>>
>> I have a few comments on iperf though.  Iperf2 is not very reliable at
>> high speeds.  For high speeds, iperf3 tends to do a little better assuming
>> you have enough computer to push the required speeds.  However iperf3
>> cannot yet do bi-di tests.
>>
>> For affordable testing, we've found Mikrotik's traffic generator to be
>> pretty good.  It's a little complicated to setup the first time but then it
>> is better.  Beware using btest - it uses a single core and can't keep up
>> especially if you try random data.
>>
>> Then there's RFC testers like Exfo, Smartbits, etc.  We use Smartbits.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Hal
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 9:15 AM Stefan Englhardt  wrote:
>>
>>> Every new gear is suspicious in regards of holding up to the promises
>>> made.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> We’ve heard so many promises in the past and very often the truth does
>>> not meet marketing.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> So there is nothing aggressive if someone wants to see iperf testing.
>>> Seeing is believing.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Von:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *Im Auftrag von *Ken Hohhof
>>> *Gesendet:* Montag, 4. April 2016 15:08
>>> *An:* af@afmug.com
>>> *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> By comparison to the presidential contest, the tone was very mild!  Did
>>> you see Jimmy Kimmel’s American Girl & Boy Dolls Presidential Collection?
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded=FYHPr7TL2AY
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Faisal Imtiaz 
>>>
>>> *Sent:* Monday, April 04, 2016 8:03 AM
>>>
>>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>>>
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I am not being defensive about Ignite, as I stated in my email I am
>>> having a reaction to the tone of your question. If you were to look at my
>>> posts you will also see that I have expressed similar feelings to others in
>>> regards to how they ask the question... irrespective of who they are asking
>>> about.  I also apologized for this being a personality defect in myself.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The Cut & Paste was not for your benefit, but for others who lurk in the
>>> forums.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> There is nothing wrong with running an iperf test.. but you specifically
>>> asked for the test to be run in a very particular way, from very particular
>>> pieces of equipment.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> My apologies if I am over reacting WISP's have many many great
>>> attributes, however there is one attribute which would be nice to change
>>> for the better Our Attitudes towards the mfg. and the default
>>> presumption of a 'conspiracy' or 'they are trying to pull a fast one on
>>> us'. along with it also having enough fortitude to asking the MFG and
>>> or their representatives the technical questions before coming to the open
>>> forums and taking an opinion poll
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ok, I will now get off my soap box.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Faisal Imtiaz
>>> Snappy Internet & Telecom
>>> 7266 SW 48 Street
>>> Miami, FL 33155
>>> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
>>>
>>> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
>>>
>>>
>>> 

Re: [AFMUG] New installer tool for tree problems

2016-04-04 Thread Robert Andrews
Makes you realize how easy it is to get rid of that pesky drone that 
keeps showing up over your back yard.A bag of 10 cent balloons, a 
tank of helium and a roll of kite string...   Instant barrage balloons 
protection..


On 04/04/2016 12:18 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote:

LOL :)

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Jaime Solorza  wrote:

Balloon 1   Drone 0

On Apr 4, 2016 1:03 PM, "Randy Cosby"  wrote:



http://video.dailymail.co.uk/video/mol/2016/04/03/8869074933904817371/640x360_8869074933904817371.mp4





Randy Cosby

Vice President

InfoWest, Inc

435-674-0165






Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

2016-04-04 Thread Chuck McCown
I told my wife this morning that I am going to have to find a rehab center for 
an Amazon addict.  

From: Jaime Solorza 
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 1:47 PM
To: Animal Farm 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

My wife always complains that I don't need more tools   I respond... when you 
stop buying shoes, I will stop buying tools...she gives me the death stare.

On Apr 4, 2016 1:44 PM, "Faisal Imtiaz"  wrote:

  Chuck, somehow you remind me of my business partner who goes looking for 
projects, cause they are a perfect opportunity to collect (buy) more tools... 
one can never have enough tools !

  (He is more into power tools, construction, mechanical etc ...)

  :)

  Faisal Imtiaz
  Snappy Internet & Telecom
  7266 SW 48 Street
  Miami, FL 33155
  Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

  Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net


--

From: "Chuck McCown" 
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Monday, April 4, 2016 3:36:59 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

I just tested a cable tester from Ideal that qualifies GigE circuits.

Nice thing is, it will do a data test without cable continuity. 
(It also does the actual cable continuity tests too).

I wonder what it would show on a less than 1Gbps radio.  $1325

From: Harold Bledsoe
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 1:32 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

Sorry to be late to the party.  ;-) 

I have a few comments on iperf though.  Iperf2 is not very reliable at high 
speeds.  For high speeds, iperf3 tends to do a little better assuming you have 
enough computer to push the required speeds.  However iperf3 cannot yet do 
bi-di tests.

For affordable testing, we've found Mikrotik's traffic generator to be 
pretty good.  It's a little complicated to setup the first time but then it is 
better.  Beware using btest - it uses a single core and can't keep up 
especially if you try random data.

Then there's RFC testers like Exfo, Smartbits, etc.  We use Smartbits.

Thanks,
-Hal

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 9:15 AM Stefan Englhardt  wrote:

  Every new gear is suspicious in regards of holding up to the promises 
made.



  We’ve heard so many promises in the past and very often the truth does 
not meet marketing.



  So there is nothing aggressive if someone wants to see iperf testing. 
Seeing is believing.





  Von: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] Im Auftrag von Ken Hohhof
  Gesendet: Montag, 4. April 2016 15:08
  An: af@afmug.com
  Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?




  By comparison to the presidential contest, the tone was very mild!  Did 
you see Jimmy Kimmel’s American Girl & Boy Dolls Presidential Collection?

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded=FYHPr7TL2AY



  From: Faisal Imtiaz 

  Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 8:03 AM

  To: af@afmug.com 

  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?



  I am not being defensive about Ignite, as I stated in my email I am 
having a reaction to the tone of your question. If you were to look at my posts 
you will also see that I have expressed similar feelings to others in regards 
to how they ask the question... irrespective of who they are asking about.  I 
also apologized for this being a personality defect in myself.



  The Cut & Paste was not for your benefit, but for others who lurk in the 
forums.



  There is nothing wrong with running an iperf test.. but you specifically 
asked for the test to be run in a very particular way, from very particular 
pieces of equipment. 



  My apologies if I am over reacting WISP's have many many great 
attributes, however there is one attribute which would be nice to change for 
the better Our Attitudes towards the mfg. and the default presumption of a 
'conspiracy' or 'they are trying to pull a fast one on us'. along with it 
also having enough fortitude to asking the MFG and or their representatives the 
technical questions before coming to the open forums and taking an opinion 
poll



  ok, I will now get off my soap box.







  Regards





  Faisal Imtiaz
  Snappy Internet & Telecom
  7266 SW 48 Street
  Miami, FL 33155
  Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

  Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net




--

From: "Eric Kuhnke" 
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Sunday, April 3, 2016 11:52:00 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

For somebody who doesn't own a piece of the company and doesn't work 
there, you're extremely defensive. I 

Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

2016-04-04 Thread Jaime Solorza
My wife always complains that I don't need more tools   I respond... when
you stop buying shoes, I will stop buying tools...she gives me the death
stare.
On Apr 4, 2016 1:44 PM, "Faisal Imtiaz"  wrote:

> Chuck, somehow you remind me of my business partner who goes looking
> for projects, cause they are a perfect opportunity to collect (buy) more
> tools... one can never have enough tools !
>
> (He is more into power tools, construction, mechanical etc ...)
>
> :)
>
> Faisal Imtiaz
> Snappy Internet & Telecom
> 7266 SW 48 Street
> Miami, FL 33155
> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
>
> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
>
> --
>
> *From: *"Chuck McCown" 
> *To: *af@afmug.com
> *Sent: *Monday, April 4, 2016 3:36:59 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
>
> I just tested a cable tester from Ideal that qualifies GigE circuits.
>
> Nice thing is, it will do a data test without cable continuity.
> (It also does the actual cable continuity tests too).
>
> I wonder what it would show on a less than 1Gbps radio.  $1325
>
> *From:* Harold Bledsoe 
> *Sent:* Monday, April 04, 2016 1:32 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
>
> Sorry to be late to the party.  ;-)
>
> I have a few comments on iperf though.  Iperf2 is not very reliable at
> high speeds.  For high speeds, iperf3 tends to do a little better assuming
> you have enough computer to push the required speeds.  However iperf3
> cannot yet do bi-di tests.
>
> For affordable testing, we've found Mikrotik's traffic generator to be
> pretty good.  It's a little complicated to setup the first time but then it
> is better.  Beware using btest - it uses a single core and can't keep up
> especially if you try random data.
>
> Then there's RFC testers like Exfo, Smartbits, etc.  We use Smartbits.
>
> Thanks,
> -Hal
>
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 9:15 AM Stefan Englhardt  wrote:
>
>> Every new gear is suspicious in regards of holding up to the promises
>> made.
>>
>>
>>
>> We’ve heard so many promises in the past and very often the truth does
>> not meet marketing.
>>
>>
>>
>> So there is nothing aggressive if someone wants to see iperf testing.
>> Seeing is believing.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Von:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *Im Auftrag von *Ken Hohhof
>> *Gesendet:* Montag, 4. April 2016 15:08
>> *An:* af@afmug.com
>> *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
>>
>>
>>
>> By comparison to the presidential contest, the tone was very mild!  Did
>> you see Jimmy Kimmel’s American Girl & Boy Dolls Presidential Collection?
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded=FYHPr7TL2AY
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Faisal Imtiaz 
>>
>> *Sent:* Monday, April 04, 2016 8:03 AM
>>
>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
>>
>>
>>
>> I am not being defensive about Ignite, as I stated in my email I am
>> having a reaction to the tone of your question. If you were to look at my
>> posts you will also see that I have expressed similar feelings to others in
>> regards to how they ask the question... irrespective of who they are asking
>> about.  I also apologized for this being a personality defect in myself.
>>
>>
>>
>> The Cut & Paste was not for your benefit, but for others who lurk in the
>> forums.
>>
>>
>>
>> There is nothing wrong with running an iperf test.. but you specifically
>> asked for the test to be run in a very particular way, from very particular
>> pieces of equipment.
>>
>>
>>
>> My apologies if I am over reacting WISP's have many many great
>> attributes, however there is one attribute which would be nice to change
>> for the better Our Attitudes towards the mfg. and the default
>> presumption of a 'conspiracy' or 'they are trying to pull a fast one on
>> us'. along with it also having enough fortitude to asking the MFG and
>> or their representatives the technical questions before coming to the open
>> forums and taking an opinion poll
>>
>>
>>
>> ok, I will now get off my soap box.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Faisal Imtiaz
>> Snappy Internet & Telecom
>> 7266 SW 48 Street
>> Miami, FL 33155
>> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
>>
>> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> *From: *"Eric Kuhnke" 
>> *To: *af@afmug.com
>> *Sent: *Sunday, April 3, 2016 11:52:00 PM
>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
>>
>> For somebody who doesn't own a piece of the company and doesn't work
>> there, you're extremely defensive. I don't need a copied and pasted
>> explanation of what FDD and TDD are.
>>
>> How in any way whatsoever is it inappropriate to run iperf tests on a
>> newly released PTP bridge radio?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 3, 

Re: [AFMUG] PSA - check your generators!

2016-04-04 Thread Robert Andrews
We have a station here in Reno that sells 110 and 114 Octane racing fuel 
at the pump...   Vro  And $$


On 04/04/2016 11:14 AM, Mathew Howard wrote:

We have quite a few stations up here that sell ethanol free gas...
mostly 91 octane, but a few have 87 too... of course you pay quite a bit
extra for it.

On Apr 4, 2016 1:10 PM, "George Skorup" > wrote:

Not in the midwest. All blends are E10.

On 4/4/2016 12:55 PM, Adam Moffett wrote:

Yeah anywhere where boating or motor sports are popular you might
find ethanol free.
I also seem to think the higher octane fuels won't have ethanol,
but I can't remember why I think that.

On 4/4/2016 1:51 PM, George Skorup wrote:

Yup. If you have a marina near you, they will most likely have
ethanol-free gas. You'll pay a little bit more for it though. We
keep a couple cheap gas inverter generators around for spares,
but we primarily use the Yamaha w/ propane.

My truck is apparently so carbon'd up that I cannot run the
E10/87 (87 octane my ass) without knocking and the PCM retarding
the timing. I'm running some Shell Nitro with extra detergent
added to try to clean it up. If I could find some of the old GM
Top Engine Cleaner, I'd do that, but the EPA banned it. So they
give us shit gas and no means to clean it. There's nowhere near
enough detergent in any of the regular gasolines. I'm not pulling
the heads to clean the cylinders, F that. I did find out that my
truck shuts down at 98MPH too. Lame.

On 4/4/2016 12:21 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:


The labels say no ethanol!

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Apr 4, 2016 12:57 PM, "George Skorup" > wrote:

We've started our little Yamaha on a 20# tank at -15F
before. It can be a bitch to get started because of the
protection valves in tanks now. We had one old tank without
the valve and it would fire up on the first pull every time.
Now it takes 5-6 pulls using the choke to get that valve open.

One thing I found out with all of my truck woes and shit
gasoline is that small/carb engines were never designed to
run the ethanol blends. The ethanol is corrosive to
non-stainless fuel systems. This is why all FlexFuel
certified systems are stainless delivery, injector rails, etc.

On 4/4/2016 8:22 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:

Yeah, I have run lots of propane generators.  Here are a
few problems.

Temperature.  If it is -20F outside, you have to have a
very very large tank to generate enough vapor to keep
the generator running.

Conversely you can use a liquid pickup and a vaporizer
but you need heat energy for the vaporizer to get the
thing started.

And liquid pickups also pick all the dirt and sludge at
the bottom of the tank.  You would not believe the
amount of gunk in those tanks (I cut old ones up for
smokers).

And no matter what kind of fuel you use, the starter
motor battery is a common point of failure as is
charger.  I like to remote the battery into the heated
building if there is a heated building. Generac was
infamous for supplying a charger that failed and you
didn't know until you needed.

I started putting telemetry on all starter motor
batteries on all generators.  That is the most important
bit of data you need to monitor.

-Original Message- From: George Skorup
Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2016 9:43 PM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PSA - check your generators!

Propane

On 4/3/2016 7:09 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:

I've had a handful of generators that always started
on the first pull. Until today.  Got another one for
the site but started tearing apart the old one and I
think it's a bad carb, something I'll have someone
else take a look at.

Mine are all sitting inside doing nothing, they're
portable with two wheels but require two people or a
ramp to put in the truck.  I don't know if I'd buy
these size units again but I really do like the 8.5
gallons and 24 hour run time...

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373











Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

2016-04-04 Thread Faisal Imtiaz
Chuck, somehow you remind me of my business partner who goes looking for 
projects, cause they are a perfect opportunity to collect (buy) more tools... 
one can never have enough tools ! 

(He is more into power tools, construction, mechanical etc ...) 

:) 

Faisal Imtiaz 
Snappy Internet & Telecom 
7266 SW 48 Street 
Miami, FL 33155 
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 

Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net 

> From: "Chuck McCown" 
> To: af@afmug.com
> Sent: Monday, April 4, 2016 3:36:59 PM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

> I just tested a cable tester from Ideal that qualifies GigE circuits.
> Nice thing is, it will do a data test without cable continuity.
> (It also does the actual cable continuity tests too).
> I wonder what it would show on a less than 1Gbps radio. $1325
> From: Harold Bledsoe
> Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 1:32 PM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
> Sorry to be late to the party. ;-)
> I have a few comments on iperf though. Iperf2 is not very reliable at high
> speeds. For high speeds, iperf3 tends to do a little better assuming you have
> enough computer to push the required speeds. However iperf3 cannot yet do 
> bi-di
> tests.
> For affordable testing, we've found Mikrotik's traffic generator to be pretty
> good. It's a little complicated to setup the first time but then it is better.
> Beware using btest - it uses a single core and can't keep up especially if you
> try random data.
> Then there's RFC testers like Exfo, Smartbits, etc. We use Smartbits.
> Thanks,
> -Hal
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 9:15 AM Stefan Englhardt < s...@genias.net > wrote:

>> Every new gear is suspicious in regards of holding up to the promises made.

>> We’ve heard so many promises in the past and very often the truth does not 
>> meet
>> marketing.

>> So there is nothing aggressive if someone wants to see iperf testing. Seeing 
>> is
>> believing.

>> Von: Af [mailto: af-boun...@afmug.com ] Im Auftrag von Ken Hohhof
>> Gesendet: Montag, 4. April 2016 15:08
>> An: af@afmug.com
>> Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

>> By comparison to the presidential contest, the tone was very mild! Did you 
>> see
>> Jimmy Kimmel’s American Girl & Boy Dolls Presidential Collection?

>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded=FYHPr7TL2AY

>> From: Faisal Imtiaz

>> Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 8:03 AM

>> To: af@afmug.com

>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

>> I am not being defensive about Ignite, as I stated in my email I am 
>> having a
>> reaction to the tone of your question. If you were to look at my posts you 
>> will
>> also see that I have expressed similar feelings to others in regards to how
>> they ask the question... irrespective of who they are asking about. I also
>> apologized for this being a personality defect in myself.

>> The Cut & Paste was not for your benefit, but for others who lurk in the 
>> forums.

>> There is nothing wrong with running an iperf test.. but you specifically 
>> asked
>> for the test to be run in a very particular way, from very particular pieces 
>> of
>> equipment.

>> My apologies if I am over reacting WISP's have many many great 
>> attributes,
>> however there is one attribute which would be nice to change for the 
>> better
>> Our Attitudes towards the mfg. and the default presumption of a 'conspiracy' 
>> or
>> 'they are trying to pull a fast one on us'. along with it also having
>> enough fortitude to asking the MFG and or their representatives the technical
>> questions before coming to the open forums and taking an opinion poll

>> ok, I will now get off my soap box.

>> Regards

>> Faisal Imtiaz
>> Snappy Internet & Telecom
>> 7266 SW 48 Street
>> Miami, FL 33155
>> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

>> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net

>>> From: "Eric Kuhnke" < eric.kuh...@gmail.com >
>>> To: af@afmug.com
>>> Sent: Sunday, April 3, 2016 11:52:00 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
>>> For somebody who doesn't own a piece of the company and doesn't work there,
>>> you're extremely defensive. I don't need a copied and pasted explanation of
>>> what FDD and TDD are.

>>> How in any way whatsoever is it inappropriate to run iperf tests on a newly
>>> released PTP bridge radio?

>>> On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 8:31 PM, Faisal Imtiaz < fai...@snappytelecom.net >
>>> wrote:

 like I said before.. ask the question directly... no need for the cloak and
 dagger ...

 ---

 Frequency-division duplexing (FDD) is a method for establishing a 
 full-duplex
 communications link that uses two different radio frequencies for 
 transmitter
 and receiver operation. The transmit direction and receive direction
 frequencies are separated by a defined frequency offset. In the microwave
 realm, the 

Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

2016-04-04 Thread Chuck McCown
I just tested a cable tester from Ideal that qualifies GigE circuits.

Nice thing is, it will do a data test without cable continuity.  
(It also does the actual cable continuity tests too).

I wonder what it would show on a less than 1Gbps radio.  $1325

From: Harold Bledsoe 
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 1:32 PM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

Sorry to be late to the party.  ;-) 

I have a few comments on iperf though.  Iperf2 is not very reliable at high 
speeds.  For high speeds, iperf3 tends to do a little better assuming you have 
enough computer to push the required speeds.  However iperf3 cannot yet do 
bi-di tests.

For affordable testing, we've found Mikrotik's traffic generator to be pretty 
good.  It's a little complicated to setup the first time but then it is better. 
 Beware using btest - it uses a single core and can't keep up especially if you 
try random data.

Then there's RFC testers like Exfo, Smartbits, etc.  We use Smartbits.

Thanks,
-Hal

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 9:15 AM Stefan Englhardt  wrote:

  Every new gear is suspicious in regards of holding up to the promises made.



  We’ve heard so many promises in the past and very often the truth does not 
meet marketing.



  So there is nothing aggressive if someone wants to see iperf testing. Seeing 
is believing.





  Von: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] Im Auftrag von Ken Hohhof
  Gesendet: Montag, 4. April 2016 15:08
  An: af@afmug.com
  Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?



  By comparison to the presidential contest, the tone was very mild!  Did you 
see Jimmy Kimmel’s American Girl & Boy Dolls Presidential Collection?

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded=FYHPr7TL2AY



  From: Faisal Imtiaz 

  Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 8:03 AM

  To: af@afmug.com 

  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?



  I am not being defensive about Ignite, as I stated in my email I am 
having a reaction to the tone of your question. If you were to look at my posts 
you will also see that I have expressed similar feelings to others in regards 
to how they ask the question... irrespective of who they are asking about.  I 
also apologized for this being a personality defect in myself.



  The Cut & Paste was not for your benefit, but for others who lurk in the 
forums.



  There is nothing wrong with running an iperf test.. but you specifically 
asked for the test to be run in a very particular way, from very particular 
pieces of equipment. 



  My apologies if I am over reacting WISP's have many many great 
attributes, however there is one attribute which would be nice to change for 
the better Our Attitudes towards the mfg. and the default presumption of a 
'conspiracy' or 'they are trying to pull a fast one on us'. along with it 
also having enough fortitude to asking the MFG and or their representatives the 
technical questions before coming to the open forums and taking an opinion 
poll



  ok, I will now get off my soap box.







  Regards





  Faisal Imtiaz
  Snappy Internet & Telecom
  7266 SW 48 Street
  Miami, FL 33155
  Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

  Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net




--

From: "Eric Kuhnke" 
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Sunday, April 3, 2016 11:52:00 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

For somebody who doesn't own a piece of the company and doesn't work there, 
you're extremely defensive. I don't need a copied and pasted explanation of 
what FDD and TDD are.

How in any way whatsoever is it inappropriate to run iperf tests on a newly 
released PTP bridge radio?



On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 8:31 PM, Faisal Imtiaz  
wrote:



  like I said before..  ask the question directly... no need for the cloak 
and dagger ...



  ---

  Frequency-division duplexing (FDD) is a method for establishing a 
full-duplex communications link that uses two different radio frequencies for 
transmitter and receiver operation. The transmit direction and receive 
direction frequencies are separated by a defined frequency offset. In the 
microwave realm, the primary advantages of this approach are:

  -

  NO THEY ARE NOT FDD.



  

  Time-division duplexing (TDD) is a method for emulating full-duplex 
communication over a half-duplex communication link. The transmitter and 
receiver both use the same frequency but transmit and receive traffic is 
switched in time. The primary advantages of this approach as it applies to 
microwave communication are:

  --

  YES They are TDD. ( The notation of 1gig aggregate should have give this 
away ! )



  Like all new products, they are making improvements with 

Re: [AFMUG] OT: 3D Printer

2016-04-04 Thread Sam Lambie
More likely https://www.tinkercad.com

As the tinkerbots is a kids toy. Maybe you just like sounding smart, but
really you just like to play with tractors in your living room?

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Sam Lambie  wrote:

> www.tinkerbots.com
>
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Robert Andrews 
> wrote:
>
>> Printrbot Metal has been good for me, I even got all in for less than
>> $500, as I bought during a sale.   Do NOT go the build it yourself route to
>> save a few $$.   I am using it quite a bit.  I build mounts for circuit
>> boards for custom UPS/24V power supplies we use with full reporting.   I've
>> built custom mounts for small radios and adapters for mounting
>> routerboards.   I build a lot of parts for G scale trains.   I like being
>> able to iterate a design without having any delays.   I have learned about
>> rotating parts to get better finishes on the sides that are important ( the
>> vertical side on the print stage tends to be finer ).   I am probably going
>> to go for a more expensive printer in the next few months to increase my
>> build size to 10".   So far I am just using tinkerbot.com as my design
>> software as my designs are fairly basic.  The learning curve is just about
>> vertical...  It can be frustrating. Getting things set up and keeping them
>> set up is sometimes art as much as science.  But there is a ton of help out
>> there.   But it is not a dip a toe in thing, you have to put 20-50 hours of
>> learning in.
>>
>> On 04/04/2016 08:49 AM, Jeremy wrote:
>>
>>> I think Monoprice has a cheap one also.  I have no experience with them.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Chuck McCown >> > wrote:
>>>
>>> I sold mine.  It was a very large Stratsys system.
>>> They are slow.  Normally the whole thing is heated.
>>> ABS is very common.  But no matter what, it will not be as strong as
>>> a molded piece.
>>> They are good for a proof of concept thing.  A few times I used them
>>> as a pattern for cast metal parts.
>>> Or as a physical somewhat working protytpe to check a design before
>>> I had a hard mold made for injection molding.
>>> I think I would spend as little as possible if I was going to get
>>> one to just play around with.  Makerbot is pretty cheap I think.  I
>>> believe Walmart sells one.
>>> *From:* Matt 
>>> *Sent:* Monday, April 04, 2016 9:33 AM
>>> *To:* af@afmug.com 
>>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] OT: 3D Printer
>>> Anyone here using a 3D printer?  Looking to get one to play with.
>>> Any recommendations?  Would like to get a stand alone one so the PC
>>> does not have to run for whole print. Heard ABS plastic requires a
>>> heated platter? Heard ABS prints are more durable and heat resistant?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
> --
> --
> *Sam Lambie*
> Taosnet Wireless Tech.
> 575-758-7598 Office
> www.Taosnet.com 
>



-- 
-- 
*Sam Lambie*
Taosnet Wireless Tech.
575-758-7598 Office
www.Taosnet.com 


Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

2016-04-04 Thread Harold Bledsoe
Sorry to be late to the party.  ;-)

I have a few comments on iperf though.  Iperf2 is not very reliable at high
speeds.  For high speeds, iperf3 tends to do a little better assuming you
have enough computer to push the required speeds.  However iperf3 cannot
yet do bi-di tests.

For affordable testing, we've found Mikrotik's traffic generator to be
pretty good.  It's a little complicated to setup the first time but then it
is better.  Beware using btest - it uses a single core and can't keep up
especially if you try random data.

Then there's RFC testers like Exfo, Smartbits, etc.  We use Smartbits.

Thanks,
-Hal

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 9:15 AM Stefan Englhardt  wrote:

> Every new gear is suspicious in regards of holding up to the promises made.
>
>
>
> We’ve heard so many promises in the past and very often the truth does not
> meet marketing.
>
>
>
> So there is nothing aggressive if someone wants to see iperf testing.
> Seeing is believing.
>
>
>
>
>
> *Von:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *Im Auftrag von *Ken Hohhof
> *Gesendet:* Montag, 4. April 2016 15:08
> *An:* af@afmug.com
> *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
>
>
>
> By comparison to the presidential contest, the tone was very mild!  Did
> you see Jimmy Kimmel’s American Girl & Boy Dolls Presidential Collection?
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded=FYHPr7TL2AY
>
>
>
> *From:* Faisal Imtiaz 
>
> *Sent:* Monday, April 04, 2016 8:03 AM
>
> *To:* af@afmug.com
>
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
>
>
>
> I am not being defensive about Ignite, as I stated in my email I am
> having a reaction to the tone of your question. If you were to look at my
> posts you will also see that I have expressed similar feelings to others in
> regards to how they ask the question... irrespective of who they are asking
> about.  I also apologized for this being a personality defect in myself.
>
>
>
> The Cut & Paste was not for your benefit, but for others who lurk in the
> forums.
>
>
>
> There is nothing wrong with running an iperf test.. but you specifically
> asked for the test to be run in a very particular way, from very particular
> pieces of equipment.
>
>
>
> My apologies if I am over reacting WISP's have many many great
> attributes, however there is one attribute which would be nice to change
> for the better Our Attitudes towards the mfg. and the default
> presumption of a 'conspiracy' or 'they are trying to pull a fast one on
> us'. along with it also having enough fortitude to asking the MFG and
> or their representatives the technical questions before coming to the open
> forums and taking an opinion poll
>
>
>
> ok, I will now get off my soap box.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards
>
>
>
>
>
> Faisal Imtiaz
> Snappy Internet & Telecom
> 7266 SW 48 Street
> Miami, FL 33155
> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
>
> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
>
>
> --
>
> *From: *"Eric Kuhnke" 
> *To: *af@afmug.com
> *Sent: *Sunday, April 3, 2016 11:52:00 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
>
> For somebody who doesn't own a piece of the company and doesn't work
> there, you're extremely defensive. I don't need a copied and pasted
> explanation of what FDD and TDD are.
>
> How in any way whatsoever is it inappropriate to run iperf tests on a
> newly released PTP bridge radio?
>
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 8:31 PM, Faisal Imtiaz 
> wrote:
>
> like I said before..  ask the question directly... no need for the cloak
> and dagger ...
>
>
>
> ---
>
> Frequency-division duplexing (FDD) is a method for establishing a
> full-duplex communications link that uses two different radio frequencies
> for transmitter and receiver operation. The transmit direction and receive
> direction frequencies are separated by a defined frequency offset. In the
> microwave realm, the primary advantages of this approach are:
>
> -
>
> NO THEY ARE NOT FDD.
>
>
>
> 
>
> Time-division duplexing (TDD) is a method for emulating full-duplex
> communication over a half-duplex communication link. The transmitter and
> receiver both use the same frequency but transmit and receive traffic is
> switched in time. The primary advantages of this approach as it applies to
> microwave communication are:
>
> --
>
> YES They are TDD. ( The notation of 1gig aggregate should have give this
> away ! )
>
>
>
> Like all new products, they are making improvements with firmware updates.
> The published specs are 'conservative'.
>
>
>
> These are the first radios of their kind in the market place... I think
> you will need to modify your thinking about them, cause you keep comparing
> them to the other existing (much more expensive) radios in the market place.
>
>
>
> Anything else you would like to know ?
>
>
>
> 

[AFMUG] OT TSLA

2016-04-04 Thread Chuck McCown
UP 18% since I bought.  Wonder when I should sell

Re: [AFMUG] OT: 3D Printer

2016-04-04 Thread Sam Lambie
www.tinkerbots.com

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Robert Andrews 
wrote:

> Printrbot Metal has been good for me, I even got all in for less than
> $500, as I bought during a sale.   Do NOT go the build it yourself route to
> save a few $$.   I am using it quite a bit.  I build mounts for circuit
> boards for custom UPS/24V power supplies we use with full reporting.   I've
> built custom mounts for small radios and adapters for mounting
> routerboards.   I build a lot of parts for G scale trains.   I like being
> able to iterate a design without having any delays.   I have learned about
> rotating parts to get better finishes on the sides that are important ( the
> vertical side on the print stage tends to be finer ).   I am probably going
> to go for a more expensive printer in the next few months to increase my
> build size to 10".   So far I am just using tinkerbot.com as my design
> software as my designs are fairly basic.  The learning curve is just about
> vertical...  It can be frustrating. Getting things set up and keeping them
> set up is sometimes art as much as science.  But there is a ton of help out
> there.   But it is not a dip a toe in thing, you have to put 20-50 hours of
> learning in.
>
> On 04/04/2016 08:49 AM, Jeremy wrote:
>
>> I think Monoprice has a cheap one also.  I have no experience with them.
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Chuck McCown > > wrote:
>>
>> I sold mine.  It was a very large Stratsys system.
>> They are slow.  Normally the whole thing is heated.
>> ABS is very common.  But no matter what, it will not be as strong as
>> a molded piece.
>> They are good for a proof of concept thing.  A few times I used them
>> as a pattern for cast metal parts.
>> Or as a physical somewhat working protytpe to check a design before
>> I had a hard mold made for injection molding.
>> I think I would spend as little as possible if I was going to get
>> one to just play around with.  Makerbot is pretty cheap I think.  I
>> believe Walmart sells one.
>> *From:* Matt 
>> *Sent:* Monday, April 04, 2016 9:33 AM
>> *To:* af@afmug.com 
>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] OT: 3D Printer
>> Anyone here using a 3D printer?  Looking to get one to play with.
>> Any recommendations?  Would like to get a stand alone one so the PC
>> does not have to run for whole print. Heard ABS plastic requires a
>> heated platter? Heard ABS prints are more durable and heat resistant?
>>
>>
>>


-- 
-- 
*Sam Lambie*
Taosnet Wireless Tech.
575-758-7598 Office
www.Taosnet.com 


Re: [AFMUG] Paging Forrest!

2016-04-04 Thread Sean Heskett
We also use intermapper so I'd be interested in the probe you are setting
up.

-Sean


On Monday, April 4, 2016, Gino Villarini  wrote:

> we are using intemapper probes, the unit is returning bad data
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Sean Heskett  > wrote:
>
>> I would like to know about these snmp probes for the generator board if
>> you want to share Gino.
>>
>> I've been meaning to build a cacti template all winter.
>>
>> -Sean
>>
>> On Monday, April 4, 2016, Gino Villarini > > wrote:
>>
>>> Forrest,
>>>
>>> We are having some issues with some custom snmp probe we are building
>>> for the Remote Gen starter, are you available (by email) to help out?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>
>


Re: [AFMUG] Paging Forrest!

2016-04-04 Thread Gino Villarini
thanks! will do

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) <
li...@packetflux.com> wrote:

> Yeah,  just shoot an email into cust...@packetflux.com with details...
> On Apr 4, 2016 9:23 AM, "Gino Villarini"  wrote:
>
>> Forrest,
>>
>> We are having some issues with some custom snmp probe we are building for
>> the Remote Gen starter, are you available (by email) to help out?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>


Re: [AFMUG] Paging Forrest!

2016-04-04 Thread Gino Villarini
we are using intemapper probes, the unit is returning bad data


On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Sean Heskett  wrote:

> I would like to know about these snmp probes for the generator board if
> you want to share Gino.
>
> I've been meaning to build a cacti template all winter.
>
> -Sean
>
> On Monday, April 4, 2016, Gino Villarini  wrote:
>
>> Forrest,
>>
>> We are having some issues with some custom snmp probe we are building for
>> the Remote Gen starter, are you available (by email) to help out?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>


Re: [AFMUG] Russians made a 10 Gbps radio?

2016-04-04 Thread Peter Kranz
Nobody has an 80Ghz SFP+ capable radio avail yet that I know of.

 

Peter Kranz
  www.UnwiredLtd.com
Desk: 510-868-1614 x100
Mobile: 510-207-
  pkr...@unwiredltd.com

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Eric Kuhnke
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2016 3:06 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Russians made a 10 Gbps radio?

 

Looking at the 2200FX it has regular SFP ports, so at 2Gbps (500 MHz channel 
32QAM?) FDD, you can only achieve 2Gbps by doing an 802.3ad between two 
routers. In which case no single customer data stream will exeed 1Gbps. Not 
quite the same thing as having a radio with a SFP+ 10GbE interface.

That said it will probably be less costly than the equivalent options from 
Bridgewave, E-Band or perhaps SIAE.



Re: [AFMUG] New installer tool for tree problems

2016-04-04 Thread Josh Reynolds
LOL :)

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Jaime Solorza  wrote:
> Balloon 1   Drone 0
>
> On Apr 4, 2016 1:03 PM, "Randy Cosby"  wrote:
>>
>>
>> http://video.dailymail.co.uk/video/mol/2016/04/03/8869074933904817371/640x360_8869074933904817371.mp4
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Randy Cosby
>>
>> Vice President
>>
>> InfoWest, Inc
>>
>> 435-674-0165
>>
>>


Re: [AFMUG] New installer tool for tree problems

2016-04-04 Thread Jaime Solorza
Balloon 1   Drone 0
On Apr 4, 2016 1:03 PM, "Randy Cosby"  wrote:

>
> http://video.dailymail.co.uk/video/mol/2016/04/03/8869074933904817371/640x360_8869074933904817371.mp4
>
>
>
>
>
> Randy Cosby
>
> Vice President
>
> InfoWest, Inc
>
> 435-674-0165
>
>
>


[AFMUG] New installer tool for tree problems

2016-04-04 Thread Randy Cosby
http://video.dailymail.co.uk/video/mol/2016/04/03/8869074933904817371/640x36
0_8869074933904817371.mp4

 

 

Randy Cosby

Vice President

InfoWest, Inc

435-674-0165

 



Re: [AFMUG] [ot] battleship engineering

2016-04-04 Thread Faisal Imtiaz
I don't drink.. so I have go subnet some ipv6 prefixes . 

Regards. 

Faisal Imtiaz 
Snappy Internet & Telecom 
7266 SW 48 Street 
Miami, FL 33155 
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 

Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net 

> From: "Mathew Howard" 
> To: "af" 
> Sent: Monday, April 4, 2016 1:57:15 PM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [ot] battleship engineering

> Does work involve bourbon?
> On Apr 4, 2016 12:44 PM, "Faisal Imtiaz" < fai...@snappytelecom.net > wrote:

>> Let's get back to work !

>> :)

>> Faisal Imtiaz
>> Snappy Internet & Telecom
>> 7266 SW 48 Street
>> Miami, FL 33155
>> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

>> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net

>>> From: "Josh Reynolds" < j...@kyneticwifi.com >
>>> To: af@afmug.com
>>> Sent: Monday, April 4, 2016 1:39:52 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [ot] battleship engineering

>>> Faisal, you're really ruining all my fun today. I haven't had enough 
>>> bourbon for
>>> this discussion.

>>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Faisal Imtiaz < fai...@snappytelecom.net >
>>> wrote:

 Aren't they all connected ?

 You are presenting a technical argument, which does not match up to 
 factual data
 from the field is put next to it...

 The comment about war and profiteering was in reply to your comment 
 regarding
 'all life '.

 Regards

 Faisal Imtiaz
 Snappy Internet & Telecom
 7266 SW 48 Street
 Miami, FL 33155
 Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

 Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net

> From: "Josh Reynolds" < j...@kyneticwifi.com >
> To: af@afmug.com
> Sent: Monday, April 4, 2016 1:06:52 PM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [ot] battleship engineering

> There's quite a bit of strawmen in your post Faisal. We went from talking 
> about
> weapons systems to civilian casualties, and then when the points about the
> strides made in minimizing civilian casualties was brought up, you turned 
> it
> from there to a political and philosophical rant on the nature of warfare 
> and
> those who profit.

> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Faisal Imtiaz < fai...@snappytelecom.net 
> >
> wrote:

>> Yes, yes, yes... you can make any argument you like, it is easy to 
>> justify the
>> weapons and their efficiency on a relative scale...

>> However, if you take into account the views from the other side, on the 
>> ground
>> and a dose of reality even the most sane person has to rethink the
>> argument...

>> this is just one example of what I am talking about.

>> http://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/2012/09/25/national/drones-terrorising-pakistan-civilians-experts/

>> (read the expert opinion and ask yourself the question of who were, 
>> are the
>> other 98% killed )

>> And when these nut cases come back and kill kids in schools as a 
>> retaliation...
>> the folks there pay the price, again for so called 'precision bombs'.

>>> If you want to make an argument that all life is precious, I disagree - 
>>> there
>>> are some individuals out there that the world would be better off had 
>>> they not
>>> been born... a lot of them, sadly. It is tragic when non-coms get 
>>> caught in the
>> > crossfire.
>> Ok, lets go with this argument, the question is who is going the be 
>> judge and
>> jury for them ? Whose laws are you going to judge someone by, ours ? 
>> Theirs ?
>> 
>> If we are so right and correct in everything we do Then why is it 
>> that we
>> simply cannot allow open public trial of the detainees in Guantanamo ?

>> War is a dirty business, everyone looses  except for those who 
>> profit from
>> it !

>> Faisal Imtiaz
>> Snappy Internet & Telecom
>> 7266 SW 48 Street
>> Miami, FL 33155
>> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

>> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net

>>> From: "Josh Reynolds" < j...@kyneticwifi.com >
>>> To: af@afmug.com
>>> Sent: Monday, April 4, 2016 11:35:58 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [ot] battleship engineering

>>> " The point is, modern fighting machines are much more destructive, and 
>>> are
>>> indiscriminate killing machines .. they don't know the difference 
>>> between
>>> solders and civilians... It might be sexy to talk about their 
>>> destructive
>>> power, but one has to realize that destructive power is far more 
>>> reaching to
>>> human beings... and this is why we don't officially keep track of 
>>> civilian
>>> deaths
>>> ​"​

>>> Indiscriminate killing machines, yes. Always have been, and likely 
>>> always will
>>> be. More destructive? Not necessarily. The initial Call For Fire for 
>>> artillery
>>> given a map and compass has a 

Re: [AFMUG] PSA - check your generators!

2016-04-04 Thread Mathew Howard
We have quite a few stations up here that sell ethanol free gas... mostly
91 octane, but a few have 87 too... of course you pay quite a bit extra for
it.
On Apr 4, 2016 1:10 PM, "George Skorup"  wrote:

> Not in the midwest. All blends are E10.
>
> On 4/4/2016 12:55 PM, Adam Moffett wrote:
>
> Yeah anywhere where boating or motor sports are popular you might find
> ethanol free.
> I also seem to think the higher octane fuels won't have ethanol, but I
> can't remember why I think that.
>
> On 4/4/2016 1:51 PM, George Skorup wrote:
>
> Yup. If you have a marina near you, they will most likely have
> ethanol-free gas. You'll pay a little bit more for it though. We keep a
> couple cheap gas inverter generators around for spares, but we primarily
> use the Yamaha w/ propane.
>
> My truck is apparently so carbon'd up that I cannot run the E10/87 (87
> octane my ass) without knocking and the PCM retarding the timing. I'm
> running some Shell Nitro with extra detergent added to try to clean it up.
> If I could find some of the old GM Top Engine Cleaner, I'd do that, but the
> EPA banned it. So they give us shit gas and no means to clean it. There's
> nowhere near enough detergent in any of the regular gasolines. I'm not
> pulling the heads to clean the cylinders, F that. I did find out that my
> truck shuts down at 98MPH too. Lame.
>
> On 4/4/2016 12:21 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>
> The labels say no ethanol!
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
> On Apr 4, 2016 12:57 PM, "George Skorup"  wrote:
>
>> We've started our little Yamaha on a 20# tank at -15F before. It can be a
>> bitch to get started because of the protection valves in tanks now. We had
>> one old tank without the valve and it would fire up on the first pull every
>> time. Now it takes 5-6 pulls using the choke to get that valve open.
>>
>> One thing I found out with all of my truck woes and shit gasoline is that
>> small/carb engines were never designed to run the ethanol blends. The
>> ethanol is corrosive to non-stainless fuel systems. This is why all
>> FlexFuel certified systems are stainless delivery, injector rails, etc.
>>
>> On 4/4/2016 8:22 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:
>>
>>> Yeah, I have run lots of propane generators.  Here are a few problems.
>>>
>>> Temperature.  If it is -20F outside, you have to have a very very large
>>> tank to generate enough vapor to keep the generator running.
>>>
>>> Conversely you can use a liquid pickup and a vaporizer but you need heat
>>> energy for the vaporizer to get the thing started.
>>>
>>> And liquid pickups also pick all the dirt and sludge at the bottom of
>>> the tank.  You would not believe the amount of gunk in those tanks (I cut
>>> old ones up for smokers).
>>>
>>> And no matter what kind of fuel you use, the starter motor battery is a
>>> common point of failure as is charger.  I like to remote the battery into
>>> the heated building if there is a heated building. Generac was infamous for
>>> supplying a charger that failed and you didn't know until you needed.
>>>
>>> I started putting telemetry on all starter motor batteries on all
>>> generators.  That is the most important bit of data you need to monitor.
>>>
>>> -Original Message- From: George Skorup
>>> Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2016 9:43 PM
>>> To: af@afmug.com
>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PSA - check your generators!
>>>
>>> Propane
>>>
>>> On 4/3/2016 7:09 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>>>
 I've had a handful of generators that always started on the first pull.
 Until today.  Got another one for the site but started tearing apart the
 old one and I think it's a bad carb, something I'll have someone else take
 a look at.

 Mine are all sitting inside doing nothing, they're portable with two
 wheels but require two people or a ramp to put in the truck.  I don't know
 if I'd buy these size units again but I really do like the 8.5 gallons and
 24 hour run time...

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>


Re: [AFMUG] Paging Forrest!

2016-04-04 Thread Sean Heskett
I would like to know about these snmp probes for the generator board if you
want to share Gino.

I've been meaning to build a cacti template all winter.

-Sean

On Monday, April 4, 2016, Gino Villarini  wrote:

> Forrest,
>
> We are having some issues with some custom snmp probe we are building for
> the Remote Gen starter, are you available (by email) to help out?
>
> Thanks
>


Re: [AFMUG] PSA - check your generators!

2016-04-04 Thread Josh Luthman
Buy a new truck.


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 1:51 PM, George Skorup  wrote:

> Yup. If you have a marina near you, they will most likely have
> ethanol-free gas. You'll pay a little bit more for it though. We keep a
> couple cheap gas inverter generators around for spares, but we primarily
> use the Yamaha w/ propane.
>
> My truck is apparently so carbon'd up that I cannot run the E10/87 (87
> octane my ass) without knocking and the PCM retarding the timing. I'm
> running some Shell Nitro with extra detergent added to try to clean it up.
> If I could find some of the old GM Top Engine Cleaner, I'd do that, but the
> EPA banned it. So they give us shit gas and no means to clean it. There's
> nowhere near enough detergent in any of the regular gasolines. I'm not
> pulling the heads to clean the cylinders, F that. I did find out that my
> truck shuts down at 98MPH too. Lame.
>
> On 4/4/2016 12:21 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>
> The labels say no ethanol!
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
> On Apr 4, 2016 12:57 PM, "George Skorup"  wrote:
>
>> We've started our little Yamaha on a 20# tank at -15F before. It can be a
>> bitch to get started because of the protection valves in tanks now. We had
>> one old tank without the valve and it would fire up on the first pull every
>> time. Now it takes 5-6 pulls using the choke to get that valve open.
>>
>> One thing I found out with all of my truck woes and shit gasoline is that
>> small/carb engines were never designed to run the ethanol blends. The
>> ethanol is corrosive to non-stainless fuel systems. This is why all
>> FlexFuel certified systems are stainless delivery, injector rails, etc.
>>
>> On 4/4/2016 8:22 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:
>>
>>> Yeah, I have run lots of propane generators.  Here are a few problems.
>>>
>>> Temperature.  If it is -20F outside, you have to have a very very large
>>> tank to generate enough vapor to keep the generator running.
>>>
>>> Conversely you can use a liquid pickup and a vaporizer but you need heat
>>> energy for the vaporizer to get the thing started.
>>>
>>> And liquid pickups also pick all the dirt and sludge at the bottom of
>>> the tank.  You would not believe the amount of gunk in those tanks (I cut
>>> old ones up for smokers).
>>>
>>> And no matter what kind of fuel you use, the starter motor battery is a
>>> common point of failure as is charger.  I like to remote the battery into
>>> the heated building if there is a heated building. Generac was infamous for
>>> supplying a charger that failed and you didn't know until you needed.
>>>
>>> I started putting telemetry on all starter motor batteries on all
>>> generators.  That is the most important bit of data you need to monitor.
>>>
>>> -Original Message- From: George Skorup
>>> Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2016 9:43 PM
>>> To: af@afmug.com
>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PSA - check your generators!
>>>
>>> Propane
>>>
>>> On 4/3/2016 7:09 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>>>
 I've had a handful of generators that always started on the first pull.
 Until today.  Got another one for the site but started tearing apart the
 old one and I think it's a bad carb, something I'll have someone else take
 a look at.

 Mine are all sitting inside doing nothing, they're portable with two
 wheels but require two people or a ramp to put in the truck.  I don't know
 if I'd buy these size units again but I really do like the 8.5 gallons and
 24 hour run time...

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

>>>
>>>
>>
>


Re: [AFMUG] [ot] battleship engineering

2016-04-04 Thread Mathew Howard
Does work involve bourbon?
On Apr 4, 2016 12:44 PM, "Faisal Imtiaz"  wrote:

> Let's get back to work !
>
>
> :)
>
> Faisal Imtiaz
> Snappy Internet & Telecom
> 7266 SW 48 Street
> Miami, FL 33155
> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
>
> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
>
> --
>
> *From: *"Josh Reynolds" 
> *To: *af@afmug.com
> *Sent: *Monday, April 4, 2016 1:39:52 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] [ot] battleship engineering
>
> Faisal, you're really ruining all my fun today. I haven't had enough
> bourbon for this discussion.
>
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Faisal Imtiaz 
> wrote:
>
>> Aren't they all connected ?
>>
>> You are presenting a technical argument, which does not match up to
>> factual data from the field is put next to it...
>>
>> The comment about war and profiteering was in  reply to your comment
>> regarding  'all life '.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Faisal Imtiaz
>> Snappy Internet & Telecom
>> 7266 SW 48 Street
>> Miami, FL 33155
>> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
>>
>> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
>>
>> --
>>
>> *From: *"Josh Reynolds" 
>> *To: *af@afmug.com
>> *Sent: *Monday, April 4, 2016 1:06:52 PM
>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] [ot] battleship engineering
>>
>> There's quite a bit of strawmen in your post Faisal. We went from talking
>> about weapons systems to civilian casualties, and then when the points
>> about the strides made in minimizing civilian casualties was brought up,
>> you turned it from there to a political and philosophical rant on the
>> nature of warfare and those who profit.
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Faisal Imtiaz 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, yes, yes... you can make any argument you like, it is easy to
>>> justify the weapons and their efficiency on a relative scale...
>>>
>>> However, if you take into account the views from the other side, on the
>>> ground and a dose of reality even the most sane person has to rethink
>>> the argument...
>>>
>>> this is just one example of what I am talking about.
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/2012/09/25/national/drones-terrorising-pakistan-civilians-experts/
>>>
>>> (read the expert opinion and ask yourself the question of who were,
>>> are the other 98% killed )
>>>
>>> And when these nut cases come back and kill kids in schools as a
>>> retaliation... the folks there pay the price, again for so called
>>> 'precision bombs'.
>>>
>>> >If you want to make an argument that all life is precious, I disagree
>>> - there are some individuals out there that the world would be better off
>>> had they not been born... a lot of them, sadly. It is tragic when non-coms
>>> get caught in the crossfire.
>>> Ok, lets go with this argument, the question is who is going the be
>>> judge and jury for them ? Whose laws are you going to judge someone by,
>>> ours ? Theirs ? 
>>> If we are so right and correct in everything we do Then why is it
>>> that we simply cannot allow open public trial of the detainees in
>>> Guantanamo ?
>>>
>>> War is a dirty business, everyone looses  except for those who
>>> profit from it !
>>>
>>> Faisal Imtiaz
>>> Snappy Internet & Telecom
>>> 7266 SW 48 Street
>>> Miami, FL 33155
>>> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
>>>
>>> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> *From: *"Josh Reynolds" 
>>> *To: *af@afmug.com
>>> *Sent: *Monday, April 4, 2016 11:35:58 AM
>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] [ot] battleship engineering
>>>
>>> "The point is, modern fighting machines are much more destructive, and
>>> are indiscriminate killing machines .. they don't know the difference
>>> between solders and civilians... It might be sexy to talk about their
>>> destructive power, but one has to realize that destructive power is far
>>> more reaching to human beings... and this is why we don't officially
>>> keep track of civilian deaths
>>> ​"​
>>>
>>> Indiscriminate killing machines, yes. Always have been, and likely
>>> always will be. More destructive? Not necessarily. The initial Call For
>>> Fire for artillery given a map and compass has a "mean error" of 500m. It's
>>> still just as bad now as it was during World War I, maybe with slightly
>>> better numbers due to better mapping data. Fire a single Excalibur round
>>> out of one of the said artillery pieces however, and you can place the
>>> round inside a window multiple stories off the ground floor and even have a
>>> good understanding of possible building and collateral damage before the
>>> round is ever fired.
>>>
>>> Which one would you rather fire in a city?
>>>
>>> The same goes for carpet bombing. It's vastly fallen out of favor due to
>>> it's expense and mass damage, and the fact that for point targets a 

Re: [AFMUG] PSA - check your generators!

2016-04-04 Thread Adam Moffett
Yeah anywhere where boating or motor sports are popular you might find 
ethanol free.
I also seem to think the higher octane fuels won't have ethanol, but I 
can't remember why I think that.


On 4/4/2016 1:51 PM, George Skorup wrote:
Yup. If you have a marina near you, they will most likely have 
ethanol-free gas. You'll pay a little bit more for it though. We keep 
a couple cheap gas inverter generators around for spares, but we 
primarily use the Yamaha w/ propane.


My truck is apparently so carbon'd up that I cannot run the E10/87 (87 
octane my ass) without knocking and the PCM retarding the timing. I'm 
running some Shell Nitro with extra detergent added to try to clean it 
up. If I could find some of the old GM Top Engine Cleaner, I'd do 
that, but the EPA banned it. So they give us shit gas and no means to 
clean it. There's nowhere near enough detergent in any of the regular 
gasolines. I'm not pulling the heads to clean the cylinders, F that. I 
did find out that my truck shuts down at 98MPH too. Lame.


On 4/4/2016 12:21 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:


The labels say no ethanol!

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Apr 4, 2016 12:57 PM, "George Skorup" > wrote:


We've started our little Yamaha on a 20# tank at -15F before. It
can be a bitch to get started because of the protection valves in
tanks now. We had one old tank without the valve and it would
fire up on the first pull every time. Now it takes 5-6 pulls
using the choke to get that valve open.

One thing I found out with all of my truck woes and shit gasoline
is that small/carb engines were never designed to run the ethanol
blends. The ethanol is corrosive to non-stainless fuel systems.
This is why all FlexFuel certified systems are stainless
delivery, injector rails, etc.

On 4/4/2016 8:22 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:

Yeah, I have run lots of propane generators.  Here are a few
problems.

Temperature.  If it is -20F outside, you have to have a very
very large tank to generate enough vapor to keep the
generator running.

Conversely you can use a liquid pickup and a vaporizer but
you need heat energy for the vaporizer to get the thing started.

And liquid pickups also pick all the dirt and sludge at the
bottom of the tank.  You would not believe the amount of gunk
in those tanks (I cut old ones up for smokers).

And no matter what kind of fuel you use, the starter motor
battery is a common point of failure as is charger.  I like
to remote the battery into the heated building if there is a
heated building. Generac was infamous for supplying a charger
that failed and you didn't know until you needed.

I started putting telemetry on all starter motor batteries on
all generators.  That is the most important bit of data you
need to monitor.

-Original Message- From: George Skorup
Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2016 9:43 PM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PSA - check your generators!

Propane

On 4/3/2016 7:09 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:

I've had a handful of generators that always started on
the first pull. Until today.  Got another one for the
site but started tearing apart the old one and I think
it's a bad carb, something I'll have someone else take a
look at.

Mine are all sitting inside doing nothing, they're
portable with two wheels but require two people or a ramp
to put in the truck.  I don't know if I'd buy these size
units again but I really do like the 8.5 gallons and 24
hour run time...

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373









Re: [AFMUG] PSA - check your generators!

2016-04-04 Thread Chuck McCown
In Utah, one of our larger gas station chains sells ethanol free at the pump.  

From: George Skorup 
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 11:51 AM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PSA - check your generators!

Yup. If you have a marina near you, they will most likely have ethanol-free 
gas. You'll pay a little bit more for it though. We keep a couple cheap gas 
inverter generators around for spares, but we primarily use the Yamaha w/ 
propane.

My truck is apparently so carbon'd up that I cannot run the E10/87 (87 octane 
my ass) without knocking and the PCM retarding the timing. I'm running some 
Shell Nitro with extra detergent added to try to clean it up. If I could find 
some of the old GM Top Engine Cleaner, I'd do that, but the EPA banned it. So 
they give us shit gas and no means to clean it. There's nowhere near enough 
detergent in any of the regular gasolines. I'm not pulling the heads to clean 
the cylinders, F that. I did find out that my truck shuts down at 98MPH too. 
Lame.


On 4/4/2016 12:21 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:

  The labels say no ethanol!

  Josh Luthman
  Office: 937-552-2340
  Direct: 937-552-2343
  1100 Wayne St
  Suite 1337
  Troy, OH 45373

  On Apr 4, 2016 12:57 PM, "George Skorup"  wrote:

We've started our little Yamaha on a 20# tank at -15F before. It can be a 
bitch to get started because of the protection valves in tanks now. We had one 
old tank without the valve and it would fire up on the first pull every time. 
Now it takes 5-6 pulls using the choke to get that valve open.

One thing I found out with all of my truck woes and shit gasoline is that 
small/carb engines were never designed to run the ethanol blends. The ethanol 
is corrosive to non-stainless fuel systems. This is why all FlexFuel certified 
systems are stainless delivery, injector rails, etc.

On 4/4/2016 8:22 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:

  Yeah, I have run lots of propane generators.  Here are a few problems.

  Temperature.  If it is -20F outside, you have to have a very very large 
tank to generate enough vapor to keep the generator running.

  Conversely you can use a liquid pickup and a vaporizer but you need heat 
energy for the vaporizer to get the thing started.

  And liquid pickups also pick all the dirt and sludge at the bottom of the 
tank.  You would not believe the amount of gunk in those tanks (I cut old ones 
up for smokers).

  And no matter what kind of fuel you use, the starter motor battery is a 
common point of failure as is charger.  I like to remote the battery into the 
heated building if there is a heated building. Generac was infamous for 
supplying a charger that failed and you didn't know until you needed.

  I started putting telemetry on all starter motor batteries on all 
generators.  That is the most important bit of data you need to monitor.

  -Original Message- From: George Skorup
  Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2016 9:43 PM
  To: af@afmug.com
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PSA - check your generators!

  Propane

  On 4/3/2016 7:09 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:

I've had a handful of generators that always started on the first pull. 
Until today.  Got another one for the site but started tearing apart the old 
one and I think it's a bad carb, something I'll have someone else take a look 
at.

Mine are all sitting inside doing nothing, they're portable with two 
wheels but require two people or a ramp to put in the truck.  I don't know if 
I'd buy these size units again but I really do like the 8.5 gallons and 24 hour 
run time...

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373








Re: [AFMUG] PSA - check your generators!

2016-04-04 Thread George Skorup
Yup. If you have a marina near you, they will most likely have 
ethanol-free gas. You'll pay a little bit more for it though. We keep a 
couple cheap gas inverter generators around for spares, but we primarily 
use the Yamaha w/ propane.


My truck is apparently so carbon'd up that I cannot run the E10/87 (87 
octane my ass) without knocking and the PCM retarding the timing. I'm 
running some Shell Nitro with extra detergent added to try to clean it 
up. If I could find some of the old GM Top Engine Cleaner, I'd do that, 
but the EPA banned it. So they give us shit gas and no means to clean 
it. There's nowhere near enough detergent in any of the regular 
gasolines. I'm not pulling the heads to clean the cylinders, F that. I 
did find out that my truck shuts down at 98MPH too. Lame.


On 4/4/2016 12:21 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:


The labels say no ethanol!

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Apr 4, 2016 12:57 PM, "George Skorup" > wrote:


We've started our little Yamaha on a 20# tank at -15F before. It
can be a bitch to get started because of the protection valves in
tanks now. We had one old tank without the valve and it would fire
up on the first pull every time. Now it takes 5-6 pulls using the
choke to get that valve open.

One thing I found out with all of my truck woes and shit gasoline
is that small/carb engines were never designed to run the ethanol
blends. The ethanol is corrosive to non-stainless fuel systems.
This is why all FlexFuel certified systems are stainless delivery,
injector rails, etc.

On 4/4/2016 8:22 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:

Yeah, I have run lots of propane generators.  Here are a few
problems.

Temperature.  If it is -20F outside, you have to have a very
very large tank to generate enough vapor to keep the generator
running.

Conversely you can use a liquid pickup and a vaporizer but you
need heat energy for the vaporizer to get the thing started.

And liquid pickups also pick all the dirt and sludge at the
bottom of the tank.  You would not believe the amount of gunk
in those tanks (I cut old ones up for smokers).

And no matter what kind of fuel you use, the starter motor
battery is a common point of failure as is charger.  I like to
remote the battery into the heated building if there is a
heated building. Generac was infamous for supplying a charger
that failed and you didn't know until you needed.

I started putting telemetry on all starter motor batteries on
all generators.  That is the most important bit of data you
need to monitor.

-Original Message- From: George Skorup
Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2016 9:43 PM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PSA - check your generators!

Propane

On 4/3/2016 7:09 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:

I've had a handful of generators that always started on
the first pull. Until today.  Got another one for the site
but started tearing apart the old one and I think it's a
bad carb, something I'll have someone else take a look at.

Mine are all sitting inside doing nothing, they're
portable with two wheels but require two people or a ramp
to put in the truck.  I don't know if I'd buy these size
units again but I really do like the 8.5 gallons and 24
hour run time...

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373







Re: [AFMUG] [ot] battleship engineering

2016-04-04 Thread Faisal Imtiaz
Let's get back to work ! 

:) 

Faisal Imtiaz 
Snappy Internet & Telecom 
7266 SW 48 Street 
Miami, FL 33155 
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 

Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net 

> From: "Josh Reynolds" 
> To: af@afmug.com
> Sent: Monday, April 4, 2016 1:39:52 PM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [ot] battleship engineering

> Faisal, you're really ruining all my fun today. I haven't had enough bourbon 
> for
> this discussion.

> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Faisal Imtiaz < fai...@snappytelecom.net >
> wrote:

>> Aren't they all connected ?

>> You are presenting a technical argument, which does not match up to factual 
>> data
>> from the field is put next to it...

>> The comment about war and profiteering was in reply to your comment regarding
>> 'all life '.

>> Regards

>> Faisal Imtiaz
>> Snappy Internet & Telecom
>> 7266 SW 48 Street
>> Miami, FL 33155
>> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

>> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net

>>> From: "Josh Reynolds" < j...@kyneticwifi.com >
>>> To: af@afmug.com
>>> Sent: Monday, April 4, 2016 1:06:52 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [ot] battleship engineering

>>> There's quite a bit of strawmen in your post Faisal. We went from talking 
>>> about
>>> weapons systems to civilian casualties, and then when the points about the
>>> strides made in minimizing civilian casualties was brought up, you turned it
>>> from there to a political and philosophical rant on the nature of warfare 
>>> and
>>> those who profit.

>>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Faisal Imtiaz < fai...@snappytelecom.net >
>>> wrote:

 Yes, yes, yes... you can make any argument you like, it is easy to justify 
 the
 weapons and their efficiency on a relative scale...

 However, if you take into account the views from the other side, on the 
 ground
 and a dose of reality even the most sane person has to rethink the
 argument...

 this is just one example of what I am talking about.

 http://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/2012/09/25/national/drones-terrorising-pakistan-civilians-experts/

 (read the expert opinion and ask yourself the question of who were, 
 are the
 other 98% killed )

 And when these nut cases come back and kill kids in schools as a 
 retaliation...
 the folks there pay the price, again for so called 'precision bombs'.

> If you want to make an argument that all life is precious, I disagree - 
> there
> are some individuals out there that the world would be better off had 
> they not
> been born... a lot of them, sadly. It is tragic when non-coms get caught 
> in the
 > crossfire.
 Ok, lets go with this argument, the question is who is going the be judge 
 and
 jury for them ? Whose laws are you going to judge someone by, ours ? 
 Theirs ?
 
 If we are so right and correct in everything we do Then why is it that 
 we
 simply cannot allow open public trial of the detainees in Guantanamo ?

 War is a dirty business, everyone looses  except for those who profit 
 from
 it !

 Faisal Imtiaz
 Snappy Internet & Telecom
 7266 SW 48 Street
 Miami, FL 33155
 Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

 Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net

> From: "Josh Reynolds" < j...@kyneticwifi.com >
> To: af@afmug.com
> Sent: Monday, April 4, 2016 11:35:58 AM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [ot] battleship engineering

> " The point is, modern fighting machines are much more destructive, and 
> are
> indiscriminate killing machines .. they don't know the difference between
> solders and civilians... It might be sexy to talk about their destructive
> power, but one has to realize that destructive power is far more reaching 
> to
> human beings... and this is why we don't officially keep track of 
> civilian
> deaths
> ​"​

> Indiscriminate killing machines, yes. Always have been, and likely always 
> will
> be. More destructive? Not necessarily. The initial Call For Fire for 
> artillery
> given a map and compass has a "mean error" of 500m. It's still just as 
> bad now
> as it was during World War I, maybe with slightly better numbers due to 
> better
> mapping data. Fire a single Excalibur round out of one of the said 
> artillery
> pieces however, and you can place the round inside a window multiple 
> stories
> off the ground floor and even have a good understanding of possible 
> building
> and collateral damage before the round is ever fired.

> Which one would you rather fire in a city?

> The same goes for carpet bombing. It's vastly fallen out of favor due to 
> it's
> expense and mass damage, and the fact that for point targets a single
> 500-2000lb JDAM can have the precise effect. For moving targets, 

Re: [AFMUG] [ot] battleship engineering

2016-04-04 Thread Josh Reynolds
Faisal, you're really ruining all my fun today. I haven't had enough
bourbon for this discussion.

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Faisal Imtiaz 
wrote:

> Aren't they all connected ?
>
> You are presenting a technical argument, which does not match up to
> factual data from the field is put next to it...
>
> The comment about war and profiteering was in  reply to your comment
> regarding  'all life '.
>
> Regards
>
> Faisal Imtiaz
> Snappy Internet & Telecom
> 7266 SW 48 Street
> Miami, FL 33155
> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
>
> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
>
> --
>
> *From: *"Josh Reynolds" 
> *To: *af@afmug.com
> *Sent: *Monday, April 4, 2016 1:06:52 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] [ot] battleship engineering
>
> There's quite a bit of strawmen in your post Faisal. We went from talking
> about weapons systems to civilian casualties, and then when the points
> about the strides made in minimizing civilian casualties was brought up,
> you turned it from there to a political and philosophical rant on the
> nature of warfare and those who profit.
>
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Faisal Imtiaz 
> wrote:
>
>> Yes, yes, yes... you can make any argument you like, it is easy to
>> justify the weapons and their efficiency on a relative scale...
>>
>> However, if you take into account the views from the other side, on the
>> ground and a dose of reality even the most sane person has to rethink
>> the argument...
>>
>> this is just one example of what I am talking about.
>>
>>
>> http://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/2012/09/25/national/drones-terrorising-pakistan-civilians-experts/
>>
>> (read the expert opinion and ask yourself the question of who were,
>> are the other 98% killed )
>>
>> And when these nut cases come back and kill kids in schools as a
>> retaliation... the folks there pay the price, again for so called
>> 'precision bombs'.
>>
>> >If you want to make an argument that all life is precious, I disagree -
>> there are some individuals out there that the world would be better off had
>> they not been born... a lot of them, sadly. It is tragic when non-coms get
>> caught in the crossfire.
>> Ok, lets go with this argument, the question is who is going the be judge
>> and jury for them ? Whose laws are you going to judge someone by, ours ?
>> Theirs ? 
>> If we are so right and correct in everything we do Then why is it
>> that we simply cannot allow open public trial of the detainees in
>> Guantanamo ?
>>
>> War is a dirty business, everyone looses  except for those who profit
>> from it !
>>
>> Faisal Imtiaz
>> Snappy Internet & Telecom
>> 7266 SW 48 Street
>> Miami, FL 33155
>> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
>>
>> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
>>
>> --
>>
>> *From: *"Josh Reynolds" 
>> *To: *af@afmug.com
>> *Sent: *Monday, April 4, 2016 11:35:58 AM
>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] [ot] battleship engineering
>>
>> "The point is, modern fighting machines are much more destructive, and
>> are indiscriminate killing machines .. they don't know the difference
>> between solders and civilians... It might be sexy to talk about their
>> destructive power, but one has to realize that destructive power is far
>> more reaching to human beings... and this is why we don't officially
>> keep track of civilian deaths
>> ​"​
>>
>> Indiscriminate killing machines, yes. Always have been, and likely always
>> will be. More destructive? Not necessarily. The initial Call For Fire for
>> artillery given a map and compass has a "mean error" of 500m. It's still
>> just as bad now as it was during World War I, maybe with slightly better
>> numbers due to better mapping data. Fire a single Excalibur round out of
>> one of the said artillery pieces however, and you can place the round
>> inside a window multiple stories off the ground floor and even have a good
>> understanding of possible building and collateral damage before the round
>> is ever fired.
>>
>> Which one would you rather fire in a city?
>>
>> The same goes for carpet bombing. It's vastly fallen out of favor due to
>> it's expense and mass damage, and the fact that for point targets a single
>> 500-2000lb JDAM can have the precise effect. For moving targets, they now
>> have laser guided JDAMS - GPS until near target, then switches to IR
>> tracker. This means you're much more likely to have positive effects on
>> target (EOT) than using a shotgun approach.
>>
>> Basically, CEP (Circular Error of Probability) went from 500m to single
>> digit meters to centimeters now, depending on the weapons system.
>> Understanding of collateral damage (persons / structures) is also much
>> better.
>>
>> TLDR: Yes, we have some weapons systems capable of massive destruction.
>> We've also come a long way in creating systems that have 

Re: [AFMUG] [ot] battleship engineering

2016-04-04 Thread Faisal Imtiaz
Aren't they all connected ? 

You are presenting a technical argument, which does not match up to factual 
data from the field is put next to it... 

The comment about war and profiteering was in reply to your comment regarding 
'all life '. 

Regards 

Faisal Imtiaz 
Snappy Internet & Telecom 
7266 SW 48 Street 
Miami, FL 33155 
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 

Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net 

> From: "Josh Reynolds" 
> To: af@afmug.com
> Sent: Monday, April 4, 2016 1:06:52 PM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [ot] battleship engineering

> There's quite a bit of strawmen in your post Faisal. We went from talking 
> about
> weapons systems to civilian casualties, and then when the points about the
> strides made in minimizing civilian casualties was brought up, you turned it
> from there to a political and philosophical rant on the nature of warfare and
> those who profit.

> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Faisal Imtiaz < fai...@snappytelecom.net >
> wrote:

>> Yes, yes, yes... you can make any argument you like, it is easy to justify 
>> the
>> weapons and their efficiency on a relative scale...

>> However, if you take into account the views from the other side, on the 
>> ground
>> and a dose of reality even the most sane person has to rethink the
>> argument...

>> this is just one example of what I am talking about.

>> http://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/2012/09/25/national/drones-terrorising-pakistan-civilians-experts/

>> (read the expert opinion and ask yourself the question of who were, are 
>> the
>> other 98% killed )

>> And when these nut cases come back and kill kids in schools as a 
>> retaliation...
>> the folks there pay the price, again for so called 'precision bombs'.

>>> If you want to make an argument that all life is precious, I disagree - 
>>> there
>>> are some individuals out there that the world would be better off had they 
>>> not
>>> been born... a lot of them, sadly. It is tragic when non-coms get caught in 
>>> the
>> > crossfire.
>> Ok, lets go with this argument, the question is who is going the be judge and
>> jury for them ? Whose laws are you going to judge someone by, ours ? Theirs ?
>> 
>> If we are so right and correct in everything we do Then why is it that we
>> simply cannot allow open public trial of the detainees in Guantanamo ?

>> War is a dirty business, everyone looses  except for those who profit 
>> from
>> it !

>> Faisal Imtiaz
>> Snappy Internet & Telecom
>> 7266 SW 48 Street
>> Miami, FL 33155
>> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

>> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net

>>> From: "Josh Reynolds" < j...@kyneticwifi.com >
>>> To: af@afmug.com
>>> Sent: Monday, April 4, 2016 11:35:58 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [ot] battleship engineering

>>> " The point is, modern fighting machines are much more destructive, and are
>>> indiscriminate killing machines .. they don't know the difference between
>>> solders and civilians... It might be sexy to talk about their destructive
>>> power, but one has to realize that destructive power is far more reaching to
>>> human beings... and this is why we don't officially keep track of 
>>> civilian
>>> deaths
>>> ​"​

>>> Indiscriminate killing machines, yes. Always have been, and likely always 
>>> will
>>> be. More destructive? Not necessarily. The initial Call For Fire for 
>>> artillery
>>> given a map and compass has a "mean error" of 500m. It's still just as bad 
>>> now
>>> as it was during World War I, maybe with slightly better numbers due to 
>>> better
>>> mapping data. Fire a single Excalibur round out of one of the said artillery
>>> pieces however, and you can place the round inside a window multiple stories
>>> off the ground floor and even have a good understanding of possible building
>>> and collateral damage before the round is ever fired.

>>> Which one would you rather fire in a city?

>>> The same goes for carpet bombing. It's vastly fallen out of favor due to 
>>> it's
>>> expense and mass damage, and the fact that for point targets a single
>>> 500-2000lb JDAM can have the precise effect. For moving targets, they now 
>>> have
>>> laser guided JDAMS - GPS until near target, then switches to IR tracker. 
>>> This
>>> means you're much more likely to have positive effects on target (EOT) than
>>> using a shotgun approach.

>>> Basically, CEP (Circular Error of Probability) went from 500m to single 
>>> digit
>>> meters to centimeters now, depending on the weapons system. Understanding of
>>> collateral damage (persons / structures) is also much better.

>>> TLDR: Yes, we have some weapons systems capable of massive destruction. 
>>> We've
>>> also come a long way in creating systems that have outstanding accuracy to
>>> lower round expenditures, create positive EOT, and minimize civilian and
>>> structural casualties.

>>> If you want to make an argument that all life is precious, I disagree - 
>>> 

Re: [AFMUG] Paging Forrest!

2016-04-04 Thread Forrest Christian (List Account)
Yeah,  just shoot an email into cust...@packetflux.com with details...
On Apr 4, 2016 9:23 AM, "Gino Villarini"  wrote:

> Forrest,
>
> We are having some issues with some custom snmp probe we are building for
> the Remote Gen starter, are you available (by email) to help out?
>
> Thanks
>


Re: [AFMUG] PSA - check your generators!

2016-04-04 Thread Josh Luthman
The labels say no ethanol!

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Apr 4, 2016 12:57 PM, "George Skorup"  wrote:

> We've started our little Yamaha on a 20# tank at -15F before. It can be a
> bitch to get started because of the protection valves in tanks now. We had
> one old tank without the valve and it would fire up on the first pull every
> time. Now it takes 5-6 pulls using the choke to get that valve open.
>
> One thing I found out with all of my truck woes and shit gasoline is that
> small/carb engines were never designed to run the ethanol blends. The
> ethanol is corrosive to non-stainless fuel systems. This is why all
> FlexFuel certified systems are stainless delivery, injector rails, etc.
>
> On 4/4/2016 8:22 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:
>
>> Yeah, I have run lots of propane generators.  Here are a few problems.
>>
>> Temperature.  If it is -20F outside, you have to have a very very large
>> tank to generate enough vapor to keep the generator running.
>>
>> Conversely you can use a liquid pickup and a vaporizer but you need heat
>> energy for the vaporizer to get the thing started.
>>
>> And liquid pickups also pick all the dirt and sludge at the bottom of the
>> tank.  You would not believe the amount of gunk in those tanks (I cut old
>> ones up for smokers).
>>
>> And no matter what kind of fuel you use, the starter motor battery is a
>> common point of failure as is charger.  I like to remote the battery into
>> the heated building if there is a heated building. Generac was infamous for
>> supplying a charger that failed and you didn't know until you needed.
>>
>> I started putting telemetry on all starter motor batteries on all
>> generators.  That is the most important bit of data you need to monitor.
>>
>> -Original Message- From: George Skorup
>> Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2016 9:43 PM
>> To: af@afmug.com
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PSA - check your generators!
>>
>> Propane
>>
>> On 4/3/2016 7:09 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>>
>>> I've had a handful of generators that always started on the first pull.
>>> Until today.  Got another one for the site but started tearing apart the
>>> old one and I think it's a bad carb, something I'll have someone else take
>>> a look at.
>>>
>>> Mine are all sitting inside doing nothing, they're portable with two
>>> wheels but require two people or a ramp to put in the truck.  I don't know
>>> if I'd buy these size units again but I really do like the 8.5 gallons and
>>> 24 hour run time...
>>>
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>
>>
>>
>


[AFMUG] FCC UNVEILS CONSUMER BROADBAND LABELS TO PROVIDE GREATER TRANSPARENCY TO CONSUMERS

2016-04-04 Thread Hardy, Tim
Labels Will Help Consumers Make Informed Broadband Purchasing Decisions and 
Serve as a Safe Harbor Format for Meeting Transparency Rule Requirements.  News 
Release. News Media Contact: Will Wiquist at (202) 418-0509, email: 
will.wiqu...@fcc.gov  CGB

https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-338708A1.pdf



Re: [AFMUG] [ot] battleship engineering

2016-04-04 Thread Josh Reynolds
There's quite a bit of strawmen in your post Faisal. We went from talking
about weapons systems to civilian casualties, and then when the points
about the strides made in minimizing civilian casualties was brought up,
you turned it from there to a political and philosophical rant on the
nature of warfare and those who profit.

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Faisal Imtiaz 
wrote:

> Yes, yes, yes... you can make any argument you like, it is easy to justify
> the weapons and their efficiency on a relative scale...
>
> However, if you take into account the views from the other side, on the
> ground and a dose of reality even the most sane person has to rethink
> the argument...
>
> this is just one example of what I am talking about.
>
>
> http://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/2012/09/25/national/drones-terrorising-pakistan-civilians-experts/
>
> (read the expert opinion and ask yourself the question of who were,
> are the other 98% killed )
>
> And when these nut cases come back and kill kids in schools as a
> retaliation... the folks there pay the price, again for so called
> 'precision bombs'.
>
> >If you want to make an argument that all life is precious, I disagree -
> there are some individuals out there that the world would be better off had
> they not been born... a lot of them, sadly. It is tragic when non-coms get
> caught in the crossfire.
>
> Ok, lets go with this argument, the question is who is going the be judge
> and jury for them ? Whose laws are you going to judge someone by, ours ?
> Theirs ? 
> If we are so right and correct in everything we do Then why is it that
> we simply cannot allow open public trial of the detainees in Guantanamo ?
>
> War is a dirty business, everyone looses  except for those who profit
> from it !
>
> Faisal Imtiaz
> Snappy Internet & Telecom
> 7266 SW 48 Street
> Miami, FL 33155
> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
>
> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
>
> --
>
> *From: *"Josh Reynolds" 
> *To: *af@afmug.com
> *Sent: *Monday, April 4, 2016 11:35:58 AM
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] [ot] battleship engineering
>
> "The point is, modern fighting machines are much more destructive, and
> are indiscriminate killing machines .. they don't know the difference
> between solders and civilians... It might be sexy to talk about their
> destructive power, but one has to realize that destructive power is far
> more reaching to human beings... and this is why we don't officially
> keep track of civilian deaths
> ​"​
>
> Indiscriminate killing machines, yes. Always have been, and likely always
> will be. More destructive? Not necessarily. The initial Call For Fire for
> artillery given a map and compass has a "mean error" of 500m. It's still
> just as bad now as it was during World War I, maybe with slightly better
> numbers due to better mapping data. Fire a single Excalibur round out of
> one of the said artillery pieces however, and you can place the round
> inside a window multiple stories off the ground floor and even have a good
> understanding of possible building and collateral damage before the round
> is ever fired.
>
> Which one would you rather fire in a city?
>
> The same goes for carpet bombing. It's vastly fallen out of favor due to
> it's expense and mass damage, and the fact that for point targets a single
> 500-2000lb JDAM can have the precise effect. For moving targets, they now
> have laser guided JDAMS - GPS until near target, then switches to IR
> tracker. This means you're much more likely to have positive effects on
> target (EOT) than using a shotgun approach.
>
> Basically, CEP (Circular Error of Probability) went from 500m to single
> digit meters to centimeters now, depending on the weapons system.
> Understanding of collateral damage (persons / structures) is also much
> better.
>
> TLDR: Yes, we have some weapons systems capable of massive destruction.
> We've also come a long way in creating systems that have outstanding
> accuracy to lower round expenditures, create positive EOT, and minimize
> civilian and structural casualties.
>
> If you want to make an argument that all life is precious, I disagree -
> there are some individuals out there that the world would be better off had
> they not been born... a lot of them, sadly. It is tragic when non-coms get
> caught in the crossfire.
>
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Faisal Imtiaz 
> wrote:
>
>> >>Perspective is a powerful thing.
>> Agreed..
>>
>> >>.Not as high as the loss of life would have been if we were running at
>> one another with swords and bows, not as high as lining up in front of one
>> another taking turns to load and shoot, and not as high as it would be had
>> we been forced from our trenches into the waiting maw of the enemy with the
>> dull smell of onions in the air behind us.
>>
>> Hmm... opinion based on which account one has 

Re: [AFMUG] [ot] battleship engineering

2016-04-04 Thread Faisal Imtiaz
Yes, yes, yes... you can make any argument you like, it is easy to justify the 
weapons and their efficiency on a relative scale... 

However, if you take into account the views from the other side, on the ground 
and a dose of reality even the most sane person has to rethink the 
argument... 

this is just one example of what I am talking about. 

http://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/2012/09/25/national/drones-terrorising-pakistan-civilians-experts/
 

(read the expert opinion and ask yourself the question of who were, are the 
other 98% killed ) 

And when these nut cases come back and kill kids in schools as a retaliation... 
the folks there pay the price, again for so called 'precision bombs'. 

> If you want to make an argument that all life is precious, I disagree - there 
> are some individuals out there that the world would be better off had they 
> not been born... a lot of them, sadly. It is tragic when non-coms get caught 
> in the crossfire. 

Ok, lets go with this argument, the question is who is going the be judge and 
jury for them ? Whose laws are you going to judge someone by, ours ? Theirs ? 
 
If we are so right and correct in everything we do Then why is it that we 
simply cannot allow open public trial of the detainees in Guantanamo ? 

War is a dirty business, everyone looses  except for those who profit from 
it ! 

Faisal Imtiaz 
Snappy Internet & Telecom 
7266 SW 48 Street 
Miami, FL 33155 
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 

Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net 

> From: "Josh Reynolds" 
> To: af@afmug.com
> Sent: Monday, April 4, 2016 11:35:58 AM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [ot] battleship engineering

> " The point is, modern fighting machines are much more destructive, and are
> indiscriminate killing machines .. they don't know the difference between
> solders and civilians... It might be sexy to talk about their destructive
> power, but one has to realize that destructive power is far more reaching to
> human beings... and this is why we don't officially keep track of civilian
> deaths
> ​"​

> Indiscriminate killing machines, yes. Always have been, and likely always will
> be. More destructive? Not necessarily. The initial Call For Fire for artillery
> given a map and compass has a "mean error" of 500m. It's still just as bad now
> as it was during World War I, maybe with slightly better numbers due to better
> mapping data. Fire a single Excalibur round out of one of the said artillery
> pieces however, and you can place the round inside a window multiple stories
> off the ground floor and even have a good understanding of possible building
> and collateral damage before the round is ever fired.

> Which one would you rather fire in a city?

> The same goes for carpet bombing. It's vastly fallen out of favor due to it's
> expense and mass damage, and the fact that for point targets a single
> 500-2000lb JDAM can have the precise effect. For moving targets, they now have
> laser guided JDAMS - GPS until near target, then switches to IR tracker. This
> means you're much more likely to have positive effects on target (EOT) than
> using a shotgun approach.

> Basically, CEP (Circular Error of Probability) went from 500m to single digit
> meters to centimeters now, depending on the weapons system. Understanding of
> collateral damage (persons / structures) is also much better.

> TLDR: Yes, we have some weapons systems capable of massive destruction. We've
> also come a long way in creating systems that have outstanding accuracy to
> lower round expenditures, create positive EOT, and minimize civilian and
> structural casualties.

> If you want to make an argument that all life is precious, I disagree - there
> are some individuals out there that the world would be better off had they not
> been born... a lot of them, sadly. It is tragic when non-coms get caught in 
> the
> crossfire.

> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Faisal Imtiaz < fai...@snappytelecom.net >
> wrote:

>> >> Perspective is a powerful thing.
>> Agreed..

. Not as high as the loss of life would have been if we were running at one
another with swords and bows, not as high as lining up in front of one 
another
taking turns to load and shoot, and not as high as it would be had we been
forced from our trenches into the waiting maw of the enemy with the dull 
smell
>> >>of onions in the air behind us.

>> Hmm... opinion based on which account one has read... Most of those battles
>> ended in one day or within a short amount of time, the battle field was 
>> always
>> contained  to soldiers.

>> The point is, modern fighting machines are much more destructive, and are
>> indiscriminate killing machines .. they don't know the difference between
>> solders and civilians... It might be sexy to talk about their destructive
>> power, but one has to realize that destructive power is far more reaching to
>> human beings... 

Re: [AFMUG] PSA - check your generators!

2016-04-04 Thread George Skorup
We've started our little Yamaha on a 20# tank at -15F before. It can be 
a bitch to get started because of the protection valves in tanks now. We 
had one old tank without the valve and it would fire up on the first 
pull every time. Now it takes 5-6 pulls using the choke to get that 
valve open.


One thing I found out with all of my truck woes and shit gasoline is 
that small/carb engines were never designed to run the ethanol blends. 
The ethanol is corrosive to non-stainless fuel systems. This is why all 
FlexFuel certified systems are stainless delivery, injector rails, etc.


On 4/4/2016 8:22 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:

Yeah, I have run lots of propane generators.  Here are a few problems.

Temperature.  If it is -20F outside, you have to have a very very 
large tank to generate enough vapor to keep the generator running.


Conversely you can use a liquid pickup and a vaporizer but you need 
heat energy for the vaporizer to get the thing started.


And liquid pickups also pick all the dirt and sludge at the bottom of 
the tank.  You would not believe the amount of gunk in those tanks (I 
cut old ones up for smokers).


And no matter what kind of fuel you use, the starter motor battery is 
a common point of failure as is charger.  I like to remote the battery 
into the heated building if there is a heated building. Generac was 
infamous for supplying a charger that failed and you didn't know until 
you needed.


I started putting telemetry on all starter motor batteries on all 
generators.  That is the most important bit of data you need to monitor.


-Original Message- From: George Skorup
Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2016 9:43 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PSA - check your generators!

Propane

On 4/3/2016 7:09 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
I've had a handful of generators that always started on the first 
pull. Until today.  Got another one for the site but started tearing 
apart the old one and I think it's a bad carb, something I'll have 
someone else take a look at.


Mine are all sitting inside doing nothing, they're portable with two 
wheels but require two people or a ramp to put in the truck.  I don't 
know if I'd buy these size units again but I really do like the 8.5 
gallons and 24 hour run time...


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373






Re: [AFMUG] Ruckus buyout

2016-04-04 Thread Josh Reynolds
Yes.

HP needed Aruba like Brocade needed Ruckus.

Gartner report has a lot to do with it.

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Travis Johnson  wrote:
> http://www.wsj.com/articles/brocade-agrees-to-buy-ruckus-wireless-for-1-2-billion-1459777258
>
>


[AFMUG] Ruckus buyout

2016-04-04 Thread Travis Johnson

http://www.wsj.com/articles/brocade-agrees-to-buy-ruckus-wireless-for-1-2-billion-1459777258




Re: [AFMUG] PSA - check your generators!

2016-04-04 Thread Chris Fabien
I got a few of the $100 2-cycle generators from Harbor Freight. Connected
to a 10-gal fuel tank they will run for about 5 days with a light load.
Cheap enough to just have a few spares on hand.

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Chuck McCown  wrote:

> Yeah, I have run lots of propane generators.  Here are a few problems.
>
> Temperature.  If it is -20F outside, you have to have a very very large
> tank to generate enough vapor to keep the generator running.
>
> Conversely you can use a liquid pickup and a vaporizer but you need heat
> energy for the vaporizer to get the thing started.
>
> And liquid pickups also pick all the dirt and sludge at the bottom of the
> tank.  You would not believe the amount of gunk in those tanks (I cut old
> ones up for smokers).
>
> And no matter what kind of fuel you use, the starter motor battery is a
> common point of failure as is charger.  I like to remote the battery into
> the heated building if there is a heated building.  Generac was infamous
> for supplying a charger that failed and you didn't know until you needed.
>
> I started putting telemetry on all starter motor batteries on all
> generators.  That is the most important bit of data you need to monitor.
>
> -Original Message- From: George Skorup
> Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2016 9:43 PM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PSA - check your generators!
>
>
> Propane
>
> On 4/3/2016 7:09 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>
>> I've had a handful of generators that always started on the first pull.
>> Until today.  Got another one for the site but started tearing apart the
>> old one and I think it's a bad carb, something I'll have someone else take
>> a look at.
>>
>> Mine are all sitting inside doing nothing, they're portable with two
>> wheels but require two people or a ramp to put in the truck.  I don't know
>> if I'd buy these size units again but I really do like the 8.5 gallons and
>> 24 hour run time...
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>
>


Re: [AFMUG] OT: 3D Printer

2016-04-04 Thread Robert Andrews
Printrbot Metal has been good for me, I even got all in for less than 
$500, as I bought during a sale.   Do NOT go the build it yourself route 
to save a few $$.   I am using it quite a bit.  I build mounts for 
circuit boards for custom UPS/24V power supplies we use with full 
reporting.   I've built custom mounts for small radios and adapters for 
mounting routerboards.   I build a lot of parts for G scale trains.   I 
like being able to iterate a design without having any delays.   I have 
learned about rotating parts to get better finishes on the sides that 
are important ( the vertical side on the print stage tends to be finer 
).   I am probably going to go for a more expensive printer in the next 
few months to increase my build size to 10".   So far I am just using 
tinkerbot.com as my design software as my designs are fairly basic.  The 
learning curve is just about vertical...  It can be frustrating. 
Getting things set up and keeping them set up is sometimes art as much 
as science.  But there is a ton of help out there.   But it is not a dip 
a toe in thing, you have to put 20-50 hours of learning in.


On 04/04/2016 08:49 AM, Jeremy wrote:

I think Monoprice has a cheap one also.  I have no experience with them.

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Chuck McCown > wrote:

I sold mine.  It was a very large Stratsys system.
They are slow.  Normally the whole thing is heated.
ABS is very common.  But no matter what, it will not be as strong as
a molded piece.
They are good for a proof of concept thing.  A few times I used them
as a pattern for cast metal parts.
Or as a physical somewhat working protytpe to check a design before
I had a hard mold made for injection molding.
I think I would spend as little as possible if I was going to get
one to just play around with.  Makerbot is pretty cheap I think.  I
believe Walmart sells one.
*From:* Matt 
*Sent:* Monday, April 04, 2016 9:33 AM
*To:* af@afmug.com 
*Subject:* [AFMUG] OT: 3D Printer
Anyone here using a 3D printer?  Looking to get one to play with.
Any recommendations?  Would like to get a stand alone one so the PC
does not have to run for whole print. Heard ABS plastic requires a
heated platter? Heard ABS prints are more durable and heat resistant?




Re: [AFMUG] OT: 3D Printer

2016-04-04 Thread Jeremy
I think Monoprice has a cheap one also.  I have no experience with them.

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Chuck McCown  wrote:

> I sold mine.  It was a very large Stratsys system.
> They are slow.  Normally the whole thing is heated.
>
> ABS is very common.  But no matter what, it will not be as strong as a
> molded piece.
> They are good for a proof of concept thing.  A few times I used them as a
> pattern for cast metal parts.
> Or as a physical somewhat working protytpe to check a design before I had
> a hard mold made for injection molding.
>
> I think I would spend as little as possible if I was going to get one to
> just play around with.  Makerbot is pretty cheap I think.  I believe
> Walmart sells one.
>
>
> *From:* Matt 
> *Sent:* Monday, April 04, 2016 9:33 AM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* [AFMUG] OT: 3D Printer
>
> Anyone here using a 3D printer?  Looking to get one to play with.  Any
> recommendations?  Would like to get a stand alone one so the PC does not
> have to run for whole print. Heard ABS plastic requires a heated platter?
> Heard ABS prints are more durable and heat resistant?
>
>
>
>


Re: [AFMUG] OT: 3D Printer

2016-04-04 Thread Chuck McCown
I sold mine.  It was a very large Stratsys system.  
They are slow.  Normally the whole thing is heated.  

ABS is very common.  But no matter what, it will not be as strong as a molded 
piece.
They are good for a proof of concept thing.  A few times I used them as a 
pattern for cast metal parts.  
Or as a physical somewhat working protytpe to check a design before I had a 
hard mold made for injection molding.  

I think I would spend as little as possible if I was going to get one to just 
play around with.  Makerbot is pretty cheap I think.  I believe Walmart sells 
one.  


From: Matt 
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 9:33 AM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: [AFMUG] OT: 3D Printer

Anyone here using a 3D printer?  Looking to get one to play with.  Any 
recommendations?  Would like to get a stand alone one so the PC does not have 
to run for whole print. Heard ABS plastic requires a heated platter? Heard ABS 
prints are more durable and heat resistant? 




Re: [AFMUG] [ot] battleship engineering

2016-04-04 Thread Josh Reynolds
"The point is, modern fighting machines are much more destructive, and are
indiscriminate killing machines .. they don't know the difference between
solders and civilians... It might be sexy to talk about their destructive
power, but one has to realize that destructive power is far more reaching
to human beings... and this is why we don't officially keep track of
civilian deaths
​"​

Indiscriminate killing machines, yes. Always have been, and likely always
will be. More destructive? Not necessarily. The initial Call For Fire for
artillery given a map and compass has a "mean error" of 500m. It's still
just as bad now as it was during World War I, maybe with slightly better
numbers due to better mapping data. Fire a single Excalibur round out of
one of the said artillery pieces however, and you can place the round
inside a window multiple stories off the ground floor and even have a good
understanding of possible building and collateral damage before the round
is ever fired.

Which one would you rather fire in a city?

The same goes for carpet bombing. It's vastly fallen out of favor due to
it's expense and mass damage, and the fact that for point targets a single
500-2000lb JDAM can have the precise effect. For moving targets, they now
have laser guided JDAMS - GPS until near target, then switches to IR
tracker. This means you're much more likely to have positive effects on
target (EOT) than using a shotgun approach.

Basically, CEP (Circular Error of Probability) went from 500m to single
digit meters to centimeters now, depending on the weapons system.
Understanding of collateral damage (persons / structures) is also much
better.

TLDR: Yes, we have some weapons systems capable of massive destruction.
We've also come a long way in creating systems that have outstanding
accuracy to lower round expenditures, create positive EOT, and minimize
civilian and structural casualties.

If you want to make an argument that all life is precious, I disagree -
there are some individuals out there that the world would be better off had
they not been born... a lot of them, sadly. It is tragic when non-coms get
caught in the crossfire.

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Faisal Imtiaz 
wrote:

> >>Perspective is a powerful thing.
> Agreed..
>
> >>.Not as high as the loss of life would have been if we were running at
> one another with swords and bows, not as high as lining up in front of one
> another taking turns to load and shoot, and not as high as it would be had
> we been forced from our trenches into the waiting maw of the enemy with the
> dull smell of onions in the air behind us.
>
> Hmm... opinion based on which account one has read... Most of those
> battles ended in one day or within a short amount of time, the battle field
> was always contained  to soldiers.
>
>
> The point is, modern fighting machines are much more destructive, and are
> indiscriminate killing machines .. they don't know the difference between
> solders and civilians... It might be sexy to talk about their destructive
> power, but one has to realize that destructive power is far more reaching
> to human beings... and this is why we don't officially keep track of
> civilian deaths
>
>
> Faisal Imtiaz
>
>
> --
>
> *From: *"Josh Reynolds" 
> *To: *af@afmug.com
> *Sent: *Monday, April 4, 2016 10:03:07 AM
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] [ot] battleship engineering
>
> Not as high as the loss of life would have been if we were running at one
> another with swords and bows, not as high as lining up in front of one
> another taking turns to load and shoot, and not as high as it would be had
> we been forced from our trenches into the waiting maw of the enemy with the
> dull smell of onions in the air behind us.
>
> Citizens of London, Stalingrad, Berlin, Nagasaki and Hiroshima would
> appreciate how "civilized" we have become from a certain point of view.
>
> Citizens of cities who have been invaded by ISIS/ISIL... Probably not so
> much.
>
> Perspective is a powerful thing.
> On Apr 4, 2016 8:09 AM, "Faisal Imtiaz"  wrote:
>
>> No offense meant to anyone
>>
>> But let me ask you one question:-
>>
>> What was the cost in human lives paid for that adventure ?
>> (Both sides, good, bad, ugly.. human cost ?)
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Faisal Imtiaz
>>
>> --
>>
>> *From: *"David Milholen" 
>> *To: *af@afmug.com
>> *Sent: *Monday, April 4, 2016 8:24:36 AM
>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] [ot] battleship engineering
>>
>> I got to sit between two units on my M1A1 tank that had a fire mission
>> into Kuwait and Iraq.
>>  The unit I called the BIg Ear sat up on the forward berm to identify
>> targets of opportunity.
>> These so called targets were other artillery that were firing on its own
>> troops for desertion.
>> By late evening the star clusters that littered the sky soon died down to
>> one or 

[AFMUG] OT: 3D Printer

2016-04-04 Thread Matt
Anyone here using a 3D printer?  Looking to get one to play with.  Any
recommendations?  Would like to get a stand alone one so the PC does not
have to run for whole print. Heard ABS plastic requires a heated platter?
Heard ABS prints are more durable and heat resistant?


Re: [AFMUG] Paging Forrest!

2016-04-04 Thread Chuck McCown
Montana, not sure if they are done hibernating up there yet or not.  

From: Gino Villarini 
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 9:23 AM
To: Animal Farm 
Subject: [AFMUG] Paging Forrest!

Forrest,  

We are having some issues with some custom snmp probe we are building for the 
Remote Gen starter, are you available (by email) to help out?

Thanks 

[AFMUG] Paging Forrest!

2016-04-04 Thread Gino Villarini
Forrest,

We are having some issues with some custom snmp probe we are building for
the Remote Gen starter, are you available (by email) to help out?

Thanks


Re: [AFMUG] [ot] battleship engineering

2016-04-04 Thread Faisal Imtiaz
>> Perspective is a powerful thing. 
Agreed.. 

>>. Not as high as the loss of life would have been if we were running at one 
>>another with swords and bows, not as high as lining up in front of one 
>>another taking turns to load and shoot, and not as high as it would be had we 
>>been forced from our trenches into the waiting maw of the enemy with the dull 
>>smell of onions in the air behind us. 

Hmm... opinion based on which account one has read... Most of those battles 
ended in one day or within a short amount of time, the battle field was always 
contained  to soldiers. 

The point is, modern fighting machines are much more destructive, and are 
indiscriminate killing machines .. they don't know the difference between 
solders and civilians... It might be sexy to talk about their destructive 
power, but one has to realize that destructive power is far more reaching to 
human beings... and this is why we don't officially keep track of civilian 
deaths 

Faisal Imtiaz 

> From: "Josh Reynolds" 
> To: af@afmug.com
> Sent: Monday, April 4, 2016 10:03:07 AM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [ot] battleship engineering

> Not as high as the loss of life would have been if we were running at one
> another with swords and bows, not as high as lining up in front of one another
> taking turns to load and shoot, and not as high as it would be had we been
> forced from our trenches into the waiting maw of the enemy with the dull smell
> of onions in the air behind us.

> Citizens of London, Stalingrad, Berlin, Nagasaki and Hiroshima would 
> appreciate
> how "civilized" we have become from a certain point of view.

> Citizens of cities who have been invaded by ISIS/ISIL... Probably not so much.

> Perspective is a powerful thing.
> On Apr 4, 2016 8:09 AM, "Faisal Imtiaz" < fai...@snappytelecom.net > wrote:

>> No offense meant to anyone

>> But let me ask you one question:-

>> What was the cost in human lives paid for that adventure ?
>> (Both sides, good, bad, ugly.. human cost ?)

>> Regards

>> Faisal Imtiaz

>>> From: "David Milholen" < dmilho...@wletc.com >
>>> To: af@afmug.com
>>> Sent: Monday, April 4, 2016 8:24:36 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [ot] battleship engineering

>>> I got to sit between two units on my M1A1 tank that had a fire mission into
>>> Kuwait and Iraq.
>>> The unit I called the BIg Ear sat up on the forward berm to identify 
>>> targets of
>>> opportunity.
>>> These so called targets were other artillery that were firing on its own 
>>> troops
>>> for desertion.
>>> By late evening the star clusters that littered the sky soon died down to 
>>> one or
>>> two after the MRLS missions were done.

>>> On 4/4/2016 12:11 AM, Josh Reynolds wrote:

 My dream fire mission was MLRS :)
 On Apr 3, 2016 10:23 PM, "Cameron Crum" < cc...@wispmon.com > wrote:

> I'm all for precision guided munitions, but nothing says we've come to 
> kick some
> ass like shelling an enemy position with the 16in guns from a battleship. 
> Talk
> about demoralizing the enemy.

> On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Josh Reynolds < j...@kyneticwifi.com > 
> wrote:

>> Systems like that don't exist so much... At least, there are no guns of 
>> that
>> size on a battleship that I'm aware of (16").

>> I know there are much smaller systems now for certain classes of 
>> warships. When
>> I was going through my joint fires naval training we talked about a 
>> bunch of
>> systems (that are now public knowledge). One of the newer naval guns has 
>> a 40+
>> nautical mile range and GPS guided round - similar to the Excalibur 
>> artillery
>> round. Those are mostly automated systems.

>> If I remember right, a full battery salvo from an Iowa class battleship 
>> on a
>> surface target could spread out the round impact locations to create a 
>> 1Km x
>> 1Km "casualty box". I always wanted the opportunity to employ that 
>> system :P
>> On Apr 3, 2016 10:23 AM, "David Milholen" < dmilho...@wletc.com > wrote:

>>> What an AWEsome piece of history.
>>> I wonder how many of those systems are completely automated and how 
>>> much faster
>>> reload time is ?

>>> On 4/3/2016 1:59 AM, Josh Reynolds wrote:

 https://youtu.be/_wT1xkRpCKk I love this stuff.

>>> --

>>> --


Re: [AFMUG] [ot] battleship engineering

2016-04-04 Thread Josh Reynolds
Not as high as the loss of life would have been if we were running at one
another with swords and bows, not as high as lining up in front of one
another taking turns to load and shoot, and not as high as it would be had
we been forced from our trenches into the waiting maw of the enemy with the
dull smell of onions in the air behind us.

Citizens of London, Stalingrad, Berlin, Nagasaki and Hiroshima would
appreciate how "civilized" we have become from a certain point of view.

Citizens of cities who have been invaded by ISIS/ISIL... Probably not so
much.

Perspective is a powerful thing.
On Apr 4, 2016 8:09 AM, "Faisal Imtiaz"  wrote:

> No offense meant to anyone
>
> But let me ask you one question:-
>
> What was the cost in human lives paid for that adventure ?
> (Both sides, good, bad, ugly.. human cost ?)
>
>
> Regards
>
> Faisal Imtiaz
>
> --
>
> *From: *"David Milholen" 
> *To: *af@afmug.com
> *Sent: *Monday, April 4, 2016 8:24:36 AM
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] [ot] battleship engineering
>
> I got to sit between two units on my M1A1 tank that had a fire mission
> into Kuwait and Iraq.
>  The unit I called the BIg Ear sat up on the forward berm to identify
> targets of opportunity.
> These so called targets were other artillery that were firing on its own
> troops for desertion.
> By late evening the star clusters that littered the sky soon died down to
> one or two after the MRLS missions were done.
>
>
> On 4/4/2016 12:11 AM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
>
> My dream fire mission was MLRS :)
> On Apr 3, 2016 10:23 PM, "Cameron Crum"  wrote:
>
>> I'm all for precision guided munitions, but nothing says we've come to
>> kick some ass like shelling an enemy position with the 16in guns from a
>> battleship. Talk about demoralizing the enemy.
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Josh Reynolds 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Systems like that don't exist so much... At least, there are no guns of
>>> that size on a battleship that I'm aware of (16").
>>>
>>> I know there are much smaller systems now for certain classes of
>>> warships. When I was going through my joint fires naval training we talked
>>> about a bunch of systems (that are now  public knowledge). One of the newer
>>> naval guns has a 40+ nautical mile range and GPS guided round - similar to
>>> the Excalibur artillery round. Those are mostly automated systems.
>>>
>>> If I remember right, a full battery salvo from an Iowa class battleship
>>> on a surface target could spread out the round impact locations to create a
>>> 1Km x 1Km "casualty box". I always wanted the opportunity to employ that
>>> system :P
>>> On Apr 3, 2016 10:23 AM, "David Milholen"  wrote:
>>>
 What an AWEsome piece of history.
 I wonder how many of those systems are completely automated and how
 much faster reload time is ?


 On 4/3/2016 1:59 AM, Josh Reynolds wrote:

 https://youtu.be/_wT1xkRpCKk

 I love this stuff.


 --

>>>
>>
> --
>
>


Re: [AFMUG] PSA - check your generators!

2016-04-04 Thread Chuck McCown

Yeah, I have run lots of propane generators.  Here are a few problems.

Temperature.  If it is -20F outside, you have to have a very very large tank 
to generate enough vapor to keep the generator running.


Conversely you can use a liquid pickup and a vaporizer but you need heat 
energy for the vaporizer to get the thing started.


And liquid pickups also pick all the dirt and sludge at the bottom of the 
tank.  You would not believe the amount of gunk in those tanks (I cut old 
ones up for smokers).


And no matter what kind of fuel you use, the starter motor battery is a 
common point of failure as is charger.  I like to remote the battery into 
the heated building if there is a heated building.  Generac was infamous for 
supplying a charger that failed and you didn't know until you needed.


I started putting telemetry on all starter motor batteries on all 
generators.  That is the most important bit of data you need to monitor.


-Original Message- 
From: George Skorup

Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2016 9:43 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PSA - check your generators!

Propane

On 4/3/2016 7:09 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
I've had a handful of generators that always started on the first pull. 
Until today.  Got another one for the site but started tearing apart the 
old one and I think it's a bad carb, something I'll have someone else take 
a look at.


Mine are all sitting inside doing nothing, they're portable with two 
wheels but require two people or a ramp to put in the truck.  I don't know 
if I'd buy these size units again but I really do like the 8.5 gallons and 
24 hour run time...


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373




Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

2016-04-04 Thread Stefan Englhardt
Every new gear is suspicious in regards of holding up to the promises made.



We’ve heard so many promises in the past and very often the truth does not meet 
marketing.



So there is nothing aggressive if someone wants to see iperf testing. Seeing is 
believing.





Von: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] Im Auftrag von Ken Hohhof
Gesendet: Montag, 4. April 2016 15:08
An: af@afmug.com
Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?



By comparison to the presidential contest, the tone was very mild!  Did you see 
Jimmy Kimmel’s American Girl & Boy Dolls Presidential Collection?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded 
 
=FYHPr7TL2AY





From: Faisal Imtiaz 

Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 8:03 AM

To: af@afmug.com 

Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?



I am not being defensive about Ignite, as I stated in my email I am having 
a reaction to the tone of your question. If you were to look at my posts you 
will also see that I have expressed similar feelings to others in regards to 
how they ask the question... irrespective of who they are asking about.  I also 
apologized for this being a personality defect in myself.



The Cut & Paste was not for your benefit, but for others who lurk in the forums.



There is nothing wrong with running an iperf test.. but you specifically asked 
for the test to be run in a very particular way, from very particular pieces of 
equipment.



My apologies if I am over reacting WISP's have many many great attributes, 
however there is one attribute which would be nice to change for the better 
Our Attitudes towards the mfg. and the default presumption of a 'conspiracy' or 
'they are trying to pull a fast one on us'. along with it also having 
enough fortitude to asking the MFG and or their representatives the technical 
questions before coming to the open forums and taking an opinion poll



ok, I will now get off my soap box.







Regards





Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet & Telecom
7266 SW 48 Street
Miami, FL 33155
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net 




  _

From: "Eric Kuhnke"  >
To: af@afmug.com 
Sent: Sunday, April 3, 2016 11:52:00 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

For somebody who doesn't own a piece of the company and doesn't work there, 
you're extremely defensive. I don't need a copied and pasted explanation of 
what FDD and TDD are.

How in any way whatsoever is it inappropriate to run iperf tests on a newly 
released PTP bridge radio?



On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 8:31 PM, Faisal Imtiaz  > wrote:



like I said before..  ask the question directly... no need for the cloak and 
dagger ...



---

Frequency-division duplexing (FDD) is a method for establishing a full-duplex 
communications link that uses two different radio frequencies for transmitter 
and receiver operation. The transmit direction and receive direction 
frequencies are separated by a defined frequency offset. In the microwave 
realm, the primary advantages of this approach are:

-

NO THEY ARE NOT FDD.





Time-division duplexing (TDD) is a method for emulating full-duplex 
communication over a half-duplex communication link. The transmitter and 
receiver both use the same frequency but transmit and receive traffic is 
switched in time. The primary advantages of this approach as it applies to 
microwave communication are:

--

YES They are TDD. ( The notation of 1gig aggregate should have give this away ! 
)



Like all new products, they are making improvements with firmware updates. The 
published specs are 'conservative'.



These are the first radios of their kind in the market place... I think you 
will need to modify your thinking about them, cause you keep comparing them to 
the other existing (much more expensive) radios in the market place.



Anything else you would like to know ?



Feel free to ask..



BTW, FWIW, I don't work for Ignite, nor do I own a piece of the company (would 
love to buy stock in them if I could). I am on the beta testers of the 
product... There is something about the tone of your question that is rubbing 
me the wrong way, my apologies if I am over reacting.. I normally  expect 
the proper professional decorum to be.. ask the question directly, and only if 
that is not answered or if the answer is not straight forward then it is ok to 
imply some intentional obfuscation.  not the other way around !



:)



Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet & Telecom
7266 SW 48 Street
Miami, FL 33155
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: 

Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

2016-04-04 Thread Joshaven Mailing Lists
Now that we know it is just a misunderstanding we can all get along again...




Sincerely,
Joshaven Potter
Google Hangouts: j...@g2wireless.co
Cell & SMS: 1-517-607-9370
supp...@joshaven.com



> On Apr 4, 2016, at 8:03 AM, Faisal Imtiaz  wrote:
> 
> I am not being defensive about Ignite, as I stated in my email I am 
> having a reaction to the tone of your question. If you were to look at my 
> posts you will also see that I have expressed similar feelings to others in 
> regards to how they ask the question... irrespective of who they are asking 
> about.  I also apologized for this being a personality defect in myself.
> 
> The Cut & Paste was not for your benefit, but for others who lurk in the 
> forums.
> 
>  There is nothing wrong with running an iperf test.. but you specifically 
> asked for the test to be run in a very particular way, from very particular 
> pieces of equipment. 
> 
> My apologies if I am over reacting WISP's have many many great 
> attributes, however there is one attribute which would be nice to change for 
> the better Our Attitudes towards the mfg. and the default presumption of 
> a 'conspiracy' or 'they are trying to pull a fast one on us'. along with 
> it also having enough fortitude to asking the MFG and or their 
> representatives the technical questions before coming to the open forums and 
> taking an opinion poll
> 
> ok, I will now get off my soap box.
> 
> 
> 
> Regards
> 
> 
> Faisal Imtiaz
> Snappy Internet & Telecom
> 7266 SW 48 Street
> Miami, FL 33155
> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
> 
> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
> 
> From: "Eric Kuhnke" 
> To: af@afmug.com
> Sent: Sunday, April 3, 2016 11:52:00 PM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
> For somebody who doesn't own a piece of the company and doesn't work there, 
> you're extremely defensive. I don't need a copied and pasted explanation of 
> what FDD and TDD are.
> 
> How in any way whatsoever is it inappropriate to run iperf tests on a newly 
> released PTP bridge radio?
> 
> On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 8:31 PM, Faisal Imtiaz  > wrote:
> like I said before..  ask the question directly... no need for the cloak and 
> dagger ...
> 
> ---
> Frequency-division duplexing (FDD) is a method for establishing a full-duplex 
> communications link that uses two different radio frequencies for transmitter 
> and receiver operation. The transmit direction and receive direction 
> frequencies are separated by a defined frequency offset. In the microwave 
> realm, the primary advantages of this approach are:
> -
> NO THEY ARE NOT FDD.
> 
> 
> Time-division duplexing (TDD) is a method for emulating full-duplex 
> communication over a half-duplex communication link. The transmitter and 
> receiver both use the same frequency but transmit and receive traffic is 
> switched in time. The primary advantages of this approach as it applies to 
> microwave communication are:
> --
> YES They are TDD. ( The notation of 1gig aggregate should have give this away 
> ! )
> 
> Like all new products, they are making improvements with firmware updates. 
> The published specs are 'conservative'. 
> 
> These are the first radios of their kind in the market place... I think you 
> will need to modify your thinking about them, cause you keep comparing them 
> to the other existing (much more expensive) radios in the market place.
> 
> Anything else you would like to know ? 
> 
> Feel free to ask.. 
> 
> BTW, FWIW, I don't work for Ignite, nor do I own a piece of the company 
> (would love to buy stock in them if I could). I am on the beta testers of the 
> product... There is something about the tone of your question that is rubbing 
> me the wrong way, my apologies if I am over reacting.. I normally  expect 
> the proper professional decorum to be.. ask the question directly, and only 
> if that is not answered or if the answer is not straight forward then it is 
> ok to imply some intentional obfuscation.  not the other way around !
> 
> :)
> 
> 
> Faisal Imtiaz
> Snappy Internet & Telecom
> 7266 SW 48 Street
> Miami, FL 33155
> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
> 
> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
> 
> From: "Eric Kuhnke" >
> To: af@afmug.com 
> Sent: Sunday, April 3, 2016 11:14:08 PM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
> I'm not trying to prove or disprove anything, just to compare them with 
> existing line rate 60 GHz FDD solutions.
> 
> The datasheet says 1Gbps aggregate throughput but nowhere does it say 
> specifically if they're FDD or TDD in the 60 GHz band:
> 
> http://www.ignitenet.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/IgniteNet_MetroLinq.pdf 
> 

Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

2016-04-04 Thread Faisal Imtiaz
Haha... I most certainly hope and pray that we don't start to use civility of 
the presidential contest as a measure for our behavior ... 

:) 

Faisal Imtiaz 

> From: "Ken Hohhof" 
> To: af@afmug.com
> Sent: Monday, April 4, 2016 9:08:28 AM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

> By comparison to the presidential contest, the tone was very mild! Did you see
> Jimmy Kimmel’s American Girl & Boy Dolls Presidential Collection?
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded=FYHPr7TL2AY
> From: Faisal Imtiaz
> Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 8:03 AM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
> I am not being defensive about Ignite, as I stated in my email I am 
> having a
> reaction to the tone of your question. If you were to look at my posts you 
> will
> also see that I have expressed similar feelings to others in regards to how
> they ask the question... irrespective of who they are asking about. I also
> apologized for this being a personality defect in myself.
> The Cut & Paste was not for your benefit, but for others who lurk in the 
> forums.
> There is nothing wrong with running an iperf test.. but you specifically asked
> for the test to be run in a very particular way, from very particular pieces 
> of
> equipment.
> My apologies if I am over reacting WISP's have many many great attributes,
> however there is one attribute which would be nice to change for the 
> better
> Our Attitudes towards the mfg. and the default presumption of a 'conspiracy' 
> or
> 'they are trying to pull a fast one on us'. along with it also having
> enough fortitude to asking the MFG and or their representatives the technical
> questions before coming to the open forums and taking an opinion poll
> ok, I will now get off my soap box.
> Regards
> Faisal Imtiaz
> Snappy Internet & Telecom
> 7266 SW 48 Street
> Miami, FL 33155
> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net

>> From: "Eric Kuhnke" 
>> To: af@afmug.com
>> Sent: Sunday, April 3, 2016 11:52:00 PM
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

>> For somebody who doesn't own a piece of the company and doesn't work there,
>> you're extremely defensive. I don't need a copied and pasted explanation of
>> what FDD and TDD are.

>> How in any way whatsoever is it inappropriate to run iperf tests on a newly
>> released PTP bridge radio?
>> On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 8:31 PM, Faisal Imtiaz < fai...@snappytelecom.net >
>> wrote:

>>> like I said before.. ask the question directly... no need for the cloak and
>>> dagger ...
>>> ---
>>> Frequency-division duplexing (FDD) is a method for establishing a 
>>> full-duplex
>>> communications link that uses two different radio frequencies for 
>>> transmitter
>>> and receiver operation. The transmit direction and receive direction
>>> frequencies are separated by a defined frequency offset. In the microwave
>>> realm, the primary advantages of this approach are:
>>> -
>>> NO THEY ARE NOT FDD.
>>> 
>>> Time-division duplexing (TDD) is a method for emulating full-duplex
>>> communication over a half-duplex communication link. The transmitter and
>>> receiver both use the same frequency but transmit and receive traffic is
>>> switched in time. The primary advantages of this approach as it applies to
>>> microwave communication are:
>>> --
>>> YES They are TDD. ( The notation of 1gig aggregate should have give this 
>>> away !
>>> )
>>> Like all new products, they are making improvements with firmware updates. 
>>> The
>>> published specs are 'conservative'.
>>> These are the first radios of their kind in the market place... I think you 
>>> will
>>> need to modify your thinking about them, cause you keep comparing them to 
>>> the
>>> other existing (much more expensive) radios in the market place.
>>> Anything else you would like to know ?
>>> Feel free to ask..
>>> BTW, FWIW, I don't work for Ignite, nor do I own a piece of the company 
>>> (would
>>> love to buy stock in them if I could). I am on the beta testers of the
>>> product... There is something about the tone of your question that is 
>>> rubbing
>>> me the wrong way, my apologies if I am over reacting.. I normally expect
>>> the proper professional decorum to be.. ask the question directly, and only 
>>> if
>>> that is not answered or if the answer is not straight forward then it is ok 
>>> to
>>> imply some intentional obfuscation. not the other way around !
>>> :)

>>> Faisal Imtiaz
>>> Snappy Internet & Telecom
>>> 7266 SW 48 Street
>>> Miami, FL 33155
>>> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

>>> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net

 From: "Eric Kuhnke" < eric.kuh...@gmail.com >
 To: af@afmug.com
 Sent: Sunday, April 3, 2016 11:14:08 PM
 Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio 

Re: [AFMUG] [ot] battleship engineering

2016-04-04 Thread Faisal Imtiaz
No offense meant to anyone 

But let me ask you one question:- 

What was the cost in human lives paid for that adventure ? 
(Both sides, good, bad, ugly.. human cost ?) 

Regards 

Faisal Imtiaz 

> From: "David Milholen" 
> To: af@afmug.com
> Sent: Monday, April 4, 2016 8:24:36 AM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [ot] battleship engineering

> I got to sit between two units on my M1A1 tank that had a fire mission into
> Kuwait and Iraq.
> The unit I called the BIg Ear sat up on the forward berm to identify targets 
> of
> opportunity.
> These so called targets were other artillery that were firing on its own 
> troops
> for desertion.
> By late evening the star clusters that littered the sky soon died down to one 
> or
> two after the MRLS missions were done.

> On 4/4/2016 12:11 AM, Josh Reynolds wrote:

>> My dream fire mission was MLRS :)
>> On Apr 3, 2016 10:23 PM, "Cameron Crum" < cc...@wispmon.com > wrote:

>>> I'm all for precision guided munitions, but nothing says we've come to kick 
>>> some
>>> ass like shelling an enemy position with the 16in guns from a battleship. 
>>> Talk
>>> about demoralizing the enemy.

>>> On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Josh Reynolds < j...@kyneticwifi.com > 
>>> wrote:

 Systems like that don't exist so much... At least, there are no guns of 
 that
 size on a battleship that I'm aware of (16").

 I know there are much smaller systems now for certain classes of warships. 
 When
 I was going through my joint fires naval training we talked about a bunch 
 of
 systems (that are now public knowledge). One of the newer naval guns has a 
 40+
 nautical mile range and GPS guided round - similar to the Excalibur 
 artillery
 round. Those are mostly automated systems.

 If I remember right, a full battery salvo from an Iowa class battleship on 
 a
 surface target could spread out the round impact locations to create a 1Km 
 x
 1Km "casualty box". I always wanted the opportunity to employ that system 
 :P
 On Apr 3, 2016 10:23 AM, "David Milholen" < dmilho...@wletc.com > wrote:

> What an AWEsome piece of history.
> I wonder how many of those systems are completely automated and how much 
> faster
> reload time is ?

> On 4/3/2016 1:59 AM, Josh Reynolds wrote:

>> https://youtu.be/_wT1xkRpCKk I love this stuff.

> --

> --


Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

2016-04-04 Thread Ken Hohhof
By comparison to the presidential contest, the tone was very mild!  Did you see 
Jimmy Kimmel’s American Girl & Boy Dolls Presidential Collection?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded=FYHPr7TL2AY


From: Faisal Imtiaz 
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 8:03 AM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

I am not being defensive about Ignite, as I stated in my email I am having 
a reaction to the tone of your question. If you were to look at my posts you 
will also see that I have expressed similar feelings to others in regards to 
how they ask the question... irrespective of who they are asking about.  I also 
apologized for this being a personality defect in myself.

The Cut & Paste was not for your benefit, but for others who lurk in the forums.

There is nothing wrong with running an iperf test.. but you specifically asked 
for the test to be run in a very particular way, from very particular pieces of 
equipment. 

My apologies if I am over reacting WISP's have many many great attributes, 
however there is one attribute which would be nice to change for the better 
Our Attitudes towards the mfg. and the default presumption of a 'conspiracy' or 
'they are trying to pull a fast one on us'. along with it also having 
enough fortitude to asking the MFG and or their representatives the technical 
questions before coming to the open forums and taking an opinion poll

ok, I will now get off my soap box.



Regards


Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet & Telecom
7266 SW 48 Street
Miami, FL 33155
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net




  From: "Eric Kuhnke" 
  To: af@afmug.com
  Sent: Sunday, April 3, 2016 11:52:00 PM
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

  For somebody who doesn't own a piece of the company and doesn't work there, 
you're extremely defensive. I don't need a copied and pasted explanation of 
what FDD and TDD are.

  How in any way whatsoever is it inappropriate to run iperf tests on a newly 
released PTP bridge radio?


  On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 8:31 PM, Faisal Imtiaz  
wrote:

like I said before..  ask the question directly... no need for the cloak 
and dagger ...

---
Frequency-division duplexing (FDD) is a method for establishing a 
full-duplex communications link that uses two different radio frequencies for 
transmitter and receiver operation. The transmit direction and receive 
direction frequencies are separated by a defined frequency offset. In the 
microwave realm, the primary advantages of this approach are:
-
NO THEY ARE NOT FDD.


Time-division duplexing (TDD) is a method for emulating full-duplex 
communication over a half-duplex communication link. The transmitter and 
receiver both use the same frequency but transmit and receive traffic is 
switched in time. The primary advantages of this approach as it applies to 
microwave communication are:
--
YES They are TDD. ( The notation of 1gig aggregate should have give this 
away ! )

Like all new products, they are making improvements with firmware updates. 
The published specs are 'conservative'. 

These are the first radios of their kind in the market place... I think you 
will need to modify your thinking about them, cause you keep comparing them to 
the other existing (much more expensive) radios in the market place.

Anything else you would like to know ? 

Feel free to ask.. 

BTW, FWIW, I don't work for Ignite, nor do I own a piece of the company 
(would love to buy stock in them if I could). I am on the beta testers of the 
product... There is something about the tone of your question that is rubbing 
me the wrong way, my apologies if I am over reacting.. I normally  expect 
the proper professional decorum to be.. ask the question directly, and only if 
that is not answered or if the answer is not straight forward then it is ok to 
imply some intentional obfuscation.  not the other way around !

:)



Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet & Telecom
7266 SW 48 Street
Miami, FL 33155
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net




  From: "Eric Kuhnke" 
  To: af@afmug.com
  Sent: Sunday, April 3, 2016 11:14:08 PM
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

  I'm not trying to prove or disprove anything, just to compare them with 
existing line rate 60 GHz FDD solutions.


  The datasheet says 1Gbps aggregate throughput but nowhere does it say 
specifically if they're FDD or TDD in the 60 GHz band:

  

  1   2   >