[AsburyPark] Re: NYT Article

2006-04-07 Thread Fred
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, oakdorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


How can you call something bullshit if you haven't seen the 
agreement? If you were at the Council Meeting Johnson said the $6 
million dollars is the amount of the work they are committed to right 
now. 




 It's bullshit.
 
 1. They came in with grand plans and promises. Now they call it 
dreams. 
 To some, a fantasy.
 
 2. $6m to do what? Henry V. once stated CH alone was an $18m 
disaster.
 
 3. Where is the agreement - BEFORE it is signed.
 
 4. What, exactly is going to be done to the buildings and who is 
going 
 to issue the permits and ensure work is done to code.
 
 5. You have the 6th ave pav, 4th ave pav omitted from 
 the presentation.
 
 /








 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[AsburyPark] Re: NYT Article

2006-04-07 Thread oakdorf
it's bullshit because they didn't make it public, did they?

Are they putting up a $6m bond? 

Remember all the grand plans?








 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[AsburyPark] Re: NYT Article

2006-04-07 Thread oakdorf
I'll call it bullshit until they spend every last dime of that $6m, on 
those boardwalk buildings and a few more benches.

I could be dead by then.

The first ave pav looks good. You know why? 
 
It never really needed any major structural work done.







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[AsburyPark] Re: NYT Article

2006-04-07 Thread Fred
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, oakdorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

That six million will be spent by the summer of 2008 and another phase 
will kick in for the next Pavillion and other work. The First Ave 
Pavillion isn't the final product it must be totally renovated too 
within 3 years of the Fifth Ave Pavillion. I'll come to your wake. 

 I'll call it bullshit until they spend every last dime of that $6m, on 
 those boardwalk buildings and a few more benches.
 
 I could be dead by then.
 
 The first ave pav looks good. You know why? 
  
 It never really needed any major structural work done.








 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[AsburyPark] Re: NYT Article

2006-04-07 Thread wernerapnj
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, oakdorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 The first ave pav looks good.

You've got to be kidding?

A completely YELLOW building looking more
akin to a Leggo component. Complete visual clash
with the Casino Complex.

Waste of paint in any color, It's a brick building.
Just needed a power washing and proper exterior repairs
to trim, doors and windows.

Werner










 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[AsburyPark] Re: NYT Article

2006-04-07 Thread oakdorf

 You've got to be kidding?
 
compared to everyting else that is falling down.

No, I don't like the p-job.

What I meant was simple, that building needed NO real structural work. 

A REAL schedule would be along the lines of Building A 2006, B and C 
2007, etc. 

Now you have to make sure that permits are issued timely, inspections 
are done on time etc. 

Keep it secret






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[AsburyPark] Re: NYT Article

2006-04-07 Thread dfsavgny
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, oakdorf oakdorf@ wrote:
 
 
 How can you call something bullshit if you haven't seen the 
 agreement? If you were at the Council Meeting Johnson said the $6 
 million dollars is the amount of the work they are committed to 
right 
 now. 
 
 
If you were there why didn't you introduce yourself? Like the 
shadows? The $6 million is important because the initial escrow is 
based upon that amount. Without seeing the actual document we don't 
know what else is in there although I suspect that the remaining 
restoration timelines are as soft as they are in the powerpoint 
presentation. Ultimately, its all up to future negotitation. Nothing 
hard.







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[AsburyPark] Re: NYT article

2006-02-19 Thread Fred
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  





You show me DOF, will Depitro won anything last month. I read the 
decision. I'll read a little. We reject that, we reject that. Show me 
will they said you can build his second building, remember The 
Brittwood was an entirely different issue. Wash your face.


  
 I don't think the story was totally negative. Depitro lied in it, 
he  
 didn't win anything last month, Metro  defunked what Depitro said  
 about negotiations with the Partners, that story could of been a  
lot 
 worse.  The reporter got a few things wrong. I'm not impressed. 
 Could you explain  why you think Depitro lied, he  did win  
something(s) in 
 court and still appealing other things in court that will  actually 
help other 
 land owners in the redevelopment zone. Are you spending any  of 
your money in 
 lawsuits to protect your property rights. 
 Could you explain why Glen Fishman could not connect with the the 
reporter.  
 He connected well enough with Malina, Lofferdo, Saunders, Bruno, 
Weldon, and  
 Aaron. 
 Do you think Dean Geibel was actually encouraged by the way in 
which Partners 
 dealt with him about  the C-8 site. You have not heard of any 
stories of 
 other people doing  business with the Partners in AP. 
 I wonder what Dean will say about the Partners in a few months, in 
the  next 
 year, and what law suits will come between them in the next few  
years. 
 
 In an interview, Asbury  Partners' principals, Glen Fishman and 
Hugh Lamle, 
 declined todiscuss their dealings with subdevelopers like Mr. 
DePetro. Mr. 
 Lamle, however,  suggested that some of the criticism comes from 
those who 
 sought to pay  bargain-basement prices for development on prime 
real estate. 
 On the issue of the boardwalk buildings that  they are supposed to 
develop 
 under the plan, the two said they had conducted  marketing studies, 
but they 
 would not disclose the results. They said only that  there 
was great interest 
 among developers for the properties. 
 The builder of the Esperanza complex, Dean  Geibel, president of 
Metro Homes, 
 said he was satisfied that Asbury Partners had  dealt fairly with 
him. He 
 said that development fees and infrastructure fees,  which affect 
the selling 
 price of units, are commonly the subject of  negotiations in such 
deals. He also 
 said that he had agreed to deed over some of  the commercial space 
in his 
 planned buildings to Asbury Partners and that it was  justified by 
the 
 redevelopers' need to control the type of retail and tone of  the 
area. 
 It is the way for them to make sure that  the beachfront area is 
what they 
 want, he said. I was actually encouraged by  the way in which 
they dealt with 
 this part.







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[AsburyPark] Re: NYT article - Say it ain’t so!

2006-02-19 Thread apoojo
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
 
 
  
 Fredy fish,
  Perhaps you 
 are on the city payroll, because anybody who had a real job would  
respect 
 people who work everyday.
  
jerry that is a terrible statement, think of it the next time you call 
a fireman, policeman, or go into city hall and ask your questions where 
you are treated with respect, you should apologize, but since you will 
not even acknowledge joes question let alone answer it, i doubt you 
will admit your mistake.
 hey werner is this better? sorry 





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [AsburyPark] Re: NYT article - Say i t ain’t so!

2006-02-19 Thread gtscarano212





In a message dated 2/19/2006 6:00:42 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
jerry 
  that is a terrible statement, think of it the next time you call a 
  fireman, policeman, or go into city hall and ask your questions where you 
  are treated with respect, you should apologize, but since you will not 
  even acknowledge joes question let alone answer it, i doubt you will admit 
  your mistake.hey werner is this better? sorry
only slacker on the payroll would feelneed to get respect from 
the public, theemployees that are secure in their 
profession,would not wanta lurkerwith a brown 
nosespeaking for them.









  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Asbury park home
  
  
Asbury park nj
  
  
Asbury park hotel
  
  


Asbury park foreclosure
  
  
Asbury park real estate
  
  
Asbury park
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "AsburyPark" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









[AsburyPark] Re: NYT article - Say it ainâ €™t so!

2006-02-19 Thread apoojo
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 In a message dated 2/19/2006 6:00:42 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 jerry  that is a terrible statement, think of it the next time you 
call 
 a  fireman, policeman, or go into city hall and ask your questions 
where 
 you  are treated with respect, you should apologize, but since you 
will 
 not  even acknowledge joes question let alone answer it, i doubt 
you 
 will admit  your mistake.
 hey werner is this better? sorry
  only slacker on the payroll would feel need to get respect from  
the public, 
 the employees that are secure in their  profession,  would not want 
a lurker 
 with a brown  nose speaking for them.

you have lost your mind too many of those 25 cent cigaretts at the 
deli! i was taught by my family to try to give respect to all, even 
pain in the butts, yet you say only a slacker would get self 
gratification by showing respect to others?  strange theory! i guess 
better to have brown on my nose than dirt covering my entire face, 
why will you not respond to joes post?





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[AsburyPark] Re: NYT article

2006-02-18 Thread Fred
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, dfsavgny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, s325run1 s325run@ wrote:
 
 





I don't think the story was totally negative. Depitro lied in it, he 
didn't win anything last month, Metro  defunked what Depitro said 
about negotiations with the Partners, that story could of been a lot 
worse. The reporter got a few things wrong. I'm not impressed.
 
  about the slow re-developement of Asbury. There are 3 photos. All 
are
  negative. None are positive
 
 The truth will set you free. For four years people have stuck their 
 heads in the sand and hoped for the best. Look where we are with 
 regard to the beachfront properties. The article was not strong 
 enough, although I think it makes clear that individuals, both 
small 
 developers and property owners, are those who are pushing this city 
 foward and that it is Asbury Partners that is holding us back. I 
think 
 the story speaks of hope and not failure. Asbury Partners WILL 
NEVER 
 rehabilatate the beachfront buildings. The sooner that is realized 
the 
 better off we will be. We can't cry over spilled milk, but it is 
what 
 it is and we have to fix it. They have to go; the sonner the better.







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[AsburyPark] Re: NYT article

2006-02-18 Thread Fred
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, s325run1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

That was Dan's plan when he got the reporter to do this. Make it 
negative. Look who the reporter talked too. This was going to be 
totally one sided, I think that changed when he started to talk to the 
other side.


 Nice try Dan



 The story is in todays NYT, front page in the Metro section. It is
 about the slow re-developement of Asbury. There are 3 photos. All are
 negative. None are positive







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[AsburyPark] Re: NYT article

2006-02-18 Thread Skip Bernstein
There are 3 photos. All are negative. None are positive

I've uploaded the 2 pictures, from the online article, to the Yahoo
site; as for negative, this is Larry's best work, you should see the
stuff he turns out when forced to spend his own money.  

For some of those pictures:
http://www.jerseyshoregourmet.com/miscellaneous/Asbury/Overdue.htm








 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[AsburyPark] Re: NYT article

2006-02-18 Thread Skip Bernstein
Dan's plan when he got the reporter to do this. Make it negative.

Wow, didn't know you had such power; I'm impressed Dan.







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[AsburyPark] Re: NYT article

2006-02-18 Thread Fred
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Skip Bernstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Didn't he brag about this last week.  I called in a some markers 




Dan's plan when he got the reporter to do this. Make it negative.
 
 Wow, didn't know you had such power; I'm impressed Dan.








 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[AsburyPark] Re: NYT article

2006-02-18 Thread Fred
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, dfsavgny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Skip Bernstein skip@ wrote:
 
 I called in some markers I had coming to me.









 Dan's plan when he got the reporter to do this. Make it negative.
  
  Wow, didn't know you had such power; I'm impressed Dan.
 
 I didn't know either. Fred, I don't know who you are, so do me a 
 favor and say it to my face. As for trying make the story negative, 
 why would I do such a thing? What would be in it for me? In fact, I 
 would only have something to lose since I am a property owner, not 
a 
 speculator, but a house for my family. As for the pictures being 
 negative, whose fault is that? The photos don't lie. They show the 
 failure of Partners to live up to its obligations and those in 
power 
 who are responsible for making them do so. I don't hide my goals; 
to 
 make sure this city is developed in a responsible manner with the 
 greatest benefit to citizens. If that calls for bringing pressure 
on 
 the City and Partners to live up to its obligations or ousting 
 Partners, then so be it. I firmly beleive that latter will be 
 necessary because I cannot see Partners doing it. I'll say it 
again; 
 the proof of the pudding is in the tasting. I think we know what it 
 tastes like.







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[AsburyPark] Re: NYT article - deja vu all over again

2006-02-18 Thread Skip Bernstein
Wow, deja vu all over again, one of the most cogent pieces Fred's yet
written.  Who could disagree with this argument?

--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, dfsavgny dfsavgny@ wrote:
 
  --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Skip Bernstein skip@ wrote:
  
  I called in some markers I had coming to me.
 

 
  Dan's plan when he got the reporter to do this. Make it negative.
   
   Wow, didn't know you had such power; I'm impressed Dan.
  
  I didn't know either. Fred, I don't know who you are, so do me a 
  favor and say it to my face. As for trying make the story negative, 
  why would I do such a thing? What would be in it for me? In fact, I 
  would only have something to lose since I am a property owner, not 
 a 
  speculator, but a house for my family. As for the pictures being 
  negative, whose fault is that? The photos don't lie. They show the 
  failure of Partners to live up to its obligations and those in 
 power 
  who are responsible for making them do so. I don't hide my goals; 
 to 
  make sure this city is developed in a responsible manner with the 
  greatest benefit to citizens. If that calls for bringing pressure 
 on 
  the City and Partners to live up to its obligations or ousting 
  Partners, then so be it. I firmly beleive that latter will be 
  necessary because I cannot see Partners doing it. I'll say it 
 again; 
  the proof of the pudding is in the tasting. I think we know what it 
  tastes like.
 







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[AsburyPark] Re: NYT article - deja vu all over again

2006-02-18 Thread Fred
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Skip Bernstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 From: dfsavgny [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Date: Fri Feb 10, 2006  11:05 pm 
Subject: Re: Look who asking the questions now.  dfsavgny 
 Offline 
 Send Email 
 Invite to Yahoo! 360º  

--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Today, one photographer  two N Y Times reporters were on fact
finding
 missions in different parts of Asbury Park. To bad the A P Press
has only one
 reporter for Asbury Park. I wonder who called in the  Times.

I called in some markers I had coming to me.


 








Wow, deja vu all over again, one of the most cogent pieces Fred's yet
 written.  Who could disagree with this argument?
 
 --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Fred asburydogma@ wrote:
 
  --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, dfsavgny dfsavgny@ wrote:
  
   --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Skip Bernstein skip@ 
wrote:
   
   I called in some markers I had coming to me.
  
 
  
   Dan's plan when he got the reporter to do this. Make it 
negative.

Wow, didn't know you had such power; I'm impressed Dan.
   
   I didn't know either. Fred, I don't know who you are, so do me 
a 
   favor and say it to my face. As for trying make the story 
negative, 
   why would I do such a thing? What would be in it for me? In 
fact, I 
   would only have something to lose since I am a property owner, 
not 
  a 
   speculator, but a house for my family. As for the pictures 
being 
   negative, whose fault is that? The photos don't lie. They show 
the 
   failure of Partners to live up to its obligations and those in 
  power 
   who are responsible for making them do so. I don't hide my 
goals; 
  to 
   make sure this city is developed in a responsible manner with 
the 
   greatest benefit to citizens. If that calls for bringing 
pressure 
  on 
   the City and Partners to live up to its obligations or ousting 
   Partners, then so be it. I firmly beleive that latter will be 
   necessary because I cannot see Partners doing it. I'll say it 
  again; 
   the proof of the pudding is in the tasting. I think we know 
what it 
   tastes like.
  
 







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [AsburyPark] Re: NYT article

2006-02-18 Thread Lighty
On 2/18/06 10:22 AM, dfsavgny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, s325run1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 The story is in todays NYT, front page in the Metro section. It is
 about the slow re-developement of Asbury. There are 3 photos. All are
 negative. None are positive
 
 The truth will set you free. For four years people have stuck their
 heads in the sand and hoped for the best. Look where we are with
 regard to the beachfront properties. The article was not strong


I agree.  I don't understand why people AREN'T MADDER.  This isn't a story
that should be pushed aside for fear that it will make things worse.  This
is a story that should be on the front page of the Asbury Park Press.  It
should be in the Coaster, the Star Ledger -- even Tri City should wake up
and print some truth once in a while.

Asbury Partners may (and probably has been) hindered by too many regulations
but the fact is that they ARE moving slowly... Too slowly.  Things need to
change and only by telling the truth will that happen.



 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[AsburyPark] Re: NYT article - deja vu all over again

2006-02-18 Thread dfsavgny
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I called in some markers I had coming to me.
 
Fred, that remark by me is in fact an admission that I used my 
influence to have someone from the NYT report a story. My last 
response was that I did not have it in my power, nor should I, to 
affect what in fact they report. I have neither the power nor 
inclination to affect what anyone reports. Hopefully, only the truth, 
the whole truth and nothing but the truth gets reported. I cannot 
understand anyone who wants to stand in the way of the truth coming to 
light. The cannot be up to good and are not to be trusted if that is 
their aim.






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[AsburyPark] Re: NYT article - deja vu all over again

2006-02-18 Thread Fred
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, dfsavgny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Fred asburydogma@ wrote:
 
  I called in some markers I had coming to me.
  
 Fred, that remark by me is in fact an admission that I used my 
 influence to have someone from the NYT report a story. My last 
 response was that I did not have it in my power, nor should I, to 
 affect what in fact they report. I have neither the power nor 
 inclination to affect what anyone reports. Hopefully, only the truth, 
 the whole truth and nothing but the truth gets reported. I cannot 
 understand anyone who wants to stand in the way of the truth coming 
to 
 light. The cannot be up to good and are not to be trusted if that is 
 their aim.







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [AsburyPark] Re: NYT article

2006-02-18 Thread gtscarano212






To 
 
I don't think the story was totally negative. Depitro lied in it, he 
 
didn't win anything last month, Metro defunked what Depitro said 
 
about negotiations with the Partners, that story could of been a 
lotworse. 
The reporter got a few things wrong. I'm not impressed.
Could you explain why you think Depitro lied, he did win 
something(s) in court and still appealing other things in court that will 
actually help other land owners in the redevelopment zone. Are you spending any 
of your money in lawsuits to protect your property rights.
Could you explain why Glen Fishman could not connect with the the reporter. 
He connected well enough with Malina, Lofferdo, Saunders, Bruno, Weldon, and 
Aaron.
Do you think Dean Geibel 
was actually encouraged by the way in which Partners dealt with him about 
the C-8 site. You have not heardof any storiesof other people doing 
business with the Partners in AP.
I wonder what Dean will say about the Partners in a few months, in the 
next year, and what law suits will comebetween them in the next few 
years.

 In an interview, Asbury 
Partners' principals, Glen Fishman and Hugh Lamle, declined to 
discuss their dealings with subdevelopers like Mr. DePetro. Mr. Lamle, however, 
suggested that some of the criticism comes from those who sought to pay 
bargain-basement prices for development on prime real estate.
On the issue of the boardwalk buildings that 
they are supposed to develop under the plan, the two said they had conducted 
marketing studies, but they would not disclose the results. They said only that 
there was "great interest" among developers for the properties.
The builder of the Esperanza complex, Dean 
Geibel, president of Metro Homes, said he was satisfied that Asbury Partners had 
dealt fairly with him. He said that development fees and infrastructure fees, 
which affect the selling price of units, are commonly the subject of 
negotiations in such deals. He also said that he had agreed to deed over some of 
the commercial space in his planned buildings to Asbury Partners and that it was 
justified by the redevelopers' need to "control the type of retail and tone" of 
the area.
"It is the way for them to make sure that 
the beachfront area is what they want," he said. "I was actually encouraged by 
the way in which they dealt with this part."





  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Asbury park home
  
  
Asbury park nj
  
  
Asbury park hotel
  
  


Asbury park foreclosure
  
  
Asbury park real estate
  
  
Asbury park
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "AsburyPark" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [AsburyPark] Re: NYT article - deja vu all over again

2006-02-18 Thread gtscarano212






 
The reporter got a few things wrong. I'm not impressed.
Could you explain to the group,what the reporter got wrong. The 
reporter talks about missedopportunities. Maybe the reporter has been to 
more council meetings than you. Even the city manager said hello to him. He not 
a secret writer and take cheap shots like you. 
For somebody who only had a few weeks to write the story, he said what Nancy 
could never say in 4 years. She objectivity was busy using the word "critics" 
when people spokeup at the meetings aboutthemissed 
deadlinesin theredevelopment plan. 
Even the Press'sEditorialsTalk about missed opportunities and 
another summer with the beachfront looking run down while Cookman Ave and the 
rest of the cityis picking up. The Beachfront is the is why most people 
came to AP for the last 130 years. 




  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Asbury park home
  
  
Asbury park nj
  
  
Asbury park hotel
  
  


Asbury park foreclosure
  
  
Asbury park real estate
  
  
Asbury park
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "AsburyPark" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









[AsburyPark] Re: NYT article - deja vu all over again

2006-02-18 Thread Skip Bernstein
I have neither the power nor inclination to affect what anyone
reports. Hopefully, only the truth, the whole truth and nothing but
the truth gets reported. I cannot understand anyone who wants to stand
in the way of the truth coming to light.

Fred belongs to that small clique of Asburians for whom the truth
will [never] set them free.  

These folks live in a bubble of good thoughts, joyous memories, and
look forward to a utopian future, wherein their every wish may be
bestowed, all irritants shall be hidden away and the notion of
disappointment will be forgotten; they will have their cake and eat it
too, in an Asbury even the gods will envy.






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[AsburyPark] Re: NYT article

2006-02-18 Thread bluebishop82
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Lighty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 -- even Tri City should wake up
 and print some truth once in a while.
 
Easy there Gary!  You won't find anyone saying triCity did a story 
because they called in a marker.  There is no such quid pro quo for 
journalism at triCity.  You have to go to the NY Times to find writers 
of that ilk (see, e.g. Jayson Blair).





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [AsburyPark] Re: NYT article

2006-02-18 Thread Lighty
On 2/18/06 4:48 PM, bluebishop82 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Lighty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 -- even Tri City should wake up
 and print some truth once in a while.
 
 Easy there Gary!  You won't find anyone saying triCity did a story
 because they called in a marker.  There is no such quid pro quo for
 journalism at triCity.  You have to go to the NY Times to find writers
 of that ilk (see, e.g. Jayson Blair).
 
 
I think the columnists all do their jobs well; however, the news in that
supposed newspaper is truly lacking.  There are a million stories happening
in the Monmouth County area every week and it seems like they never reach
Tri-City unless a press release is faxed over.

Sorry, but I prefer my alternative papers to be like the Village Voice
where writers launch their career from.



 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[AsburyPark] Re: NYT article - deja vu all over again

2006-02-18 Thread Fred
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
 The reporter got a few things wrong. I'm not impressed. 
 Could you explain to the group, what the reporter got wrong. The  
reporter 
 talks about missed opportunities. Maybe the reporter has been to  
more council 
 meetings than you. Even the city manager said hello to him. He not  
a secret 
 writer and take cheap shots like you.  
 For somebody who only had a few weeks to write the story, he said 
what Nancy  
 could never say in 4 years. She objectivity was busy using the 
word critics 
  when people spoke up at the meetings about the missed  deadlines 
in the 
 redevelopment plan.  
 Even the Press's Editorials Talk about missed opportunities and  
another 
 summer with the beachfront looking run down while Cookman Ave and 
the  rest of the 
 city is picking up. The Beachfront is the is why most people  came 
to AP for 
 the last 130 years.







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[AsburyPark] Re: NYT article

2006-02-18 Thread apoojo
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, bluebishop82 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Lighty lighty@ wrote:
 
  -- even Tri City should wake up
  and print some truth once in a while.
  
 Easy there Gary!  You won't find anyone saying triCity did a story 
 because they called in a marker.  There is no such quid pro quo for 
 journalism at triCity.  You have to go to the NY Times to find 
writers 
 of that ilk (see, e.g. Jayson Blair).

i dont know about the entire staff, you i believe but others, jak 
jones, s.s. have written articles which i consider personal agendas.  
this leaves us with the biggest hoax of all, your  paper trying to get 
dunclan oscalion electd to state office, i am so so glad i had 20 
relatives living in his district, that 40 swing probably cost him the 
election.. what is the saying pay back is sweet, oh so sweet for many 
of us in asbury, since he played such an important role in getting 
elected in Asbury most of the crooks serving time, butchy,  ray 
ray,jimmy c. , etc etc. he got bennet hired, thank god he was not here 
long enough to codify our records or we would be broke, you are clean 
your paper is not 





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[AsburyPark] Re: NYT article - deja vu all over again

2006-02-18 Thread apoojo
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, gtscarano212@ wrote:
 
   
  The reporter got a few things wrong. I'm not impressed. 
  Could you explain to the group, what the reporter got wrong. The  
 reporter 
  talks about missed opportunities. Maybe the reporter has been to  
 more council 
  meetings than you. Even the city manager said hello to him. He 
not  
 a secret 
  writer and take cheap shots like you.  
  For somebody who only had a few weeks to write the story, he said 
 what Nancy  
  could never say in 4 years. She objectivity was busy using the 
 word critics 
   when people spoke up at the meetings about the missed  deadlines 
 in the 
  redevelopment plan.  
  Even the Press's Editorials Talk about missed opportunities and  
 another 
  summer with the beachfront looking run down while Cookman Ave and 
 the  rest of the 
  city is picking up. The Beachfront is the is why most people  
came 
 to AP for 
  the last 130 years.
 








 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[AsburyPark] Re: NYT article - deja vu all over again

2006-02-18 Thread apoojo
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, gtscarano212@ wrote:
 
   
  The reporter got a few things wrong. I'm not impressed. 
  Could you explain to the group, what the reporter got wrong. The  
 reporter 
  talks about missed opportunities. Maybe the reporter has been to  
 more council 
  meetings than you. Even the city manager said hello to him. He 
not  
 a secret 
  writer and take cheap shots like you.  
  For somebody who only had a few weeks to write the story, he said 
 what Nancy  
  could never say in 4 years. She objectivity was busy using the 
 word critics 
   when people spoke up at the meetings about the missed  deadlines 
 in the 
  redevelopment plan.  
  Even the Press's Editorials Talk about missed opportunities and  
 another 
  summer with the beachfront looking run down while Cookman Ave and 
 the  rest of the 
  city is picking up. The Beachfront is the is why most people  
came 
 to AP for 
  the last 130 years.
 
 you sue you dont mean 13 years, 130 is stretching it







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[AsburyPark] Re: NYT article

2006-02-18 Thread jerseyjohn99
Mr. Lamle, however, suggested that some of the criticism comes from 
those who sought to pay bargain-basement prices for development on 
prime real estate.

Was he looking in the mirror when he made this statement?

Flashback, June 2001:
http://tinyurl.com/dlyhb

I wouldn't be surprised if Lamle  Sass were looking at exit 
strategies right now. They have gone through a complete business 
cycle with all of the easy money (subdevelopers) made and no revenue 
generated from the Oceanfront for the foreseeable future. 

With an inverted yield curve, defaults surging, and personal 
spending exceeding income, happy days will be here again soon 
enough for the vultures. They are going to have plenty more 
opportunities to make fast bucks in other distressed property, 
especially when they put the Miracle of Asbury Park fable on their 
resume. Having the Oceanfront liability off their back frees them up 
to screw up some other town.

I'll say by April Fool's Day they announce they're out.







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[AsburyPark] Re: NYT article - deja vu all over again

2006-02-18 Thread wernerapnj
apoojo, why do you keep posting copies of prior posts? 





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[AsburyPark] Re: NYT article

2006-02-18 Thread dfsavgny
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, bluebishop82 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
  
 Easy there Gary!  You won't find anyone saying triCity did a story 
 because they called in a marker.  There is no such quid pro quo 
for 
 journalism at triCity.  You have to go to the NY Times to find 
writers 
 of that ilk (see, e.g. Jayson Blair).


Tom, I am surprised at you making such an allegation. What I did is 
through personal connections get in touch with the NJ bureau and 
inform them that I thought there was a newsworthy story here. They 
looked. If there was no story, they would not print any. It is not 
easy to get the NYT down here as it often gets overshadowed by larger 
NJ cities. That is the extent of my involvement; come look and see. 
They were on their own from there. Cold calling would not work. But in 
the end there had to be interest in the story. Jayson Blair concocted 
stories. Are you suggesting that Ron Smothers did the same? Why would 
you besmirch someone's reputation needlessly? Was it not TCN and you 
that printed lies about me? Was it not you that tokk statements out of 
context to fit your own agenda? Please. You want some coverage from 
them for your freeholder race? Say what you will, the state of affairs 
AP is in lies at the feet of Partners and the Council that allowed 
them to get away with it. Hopefully that may end now. I agree with JJ, 
MD Sass is not long for here.






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[AsburyPark] Re: NYT article

2006-02-18 Thread oakdorf
to JJ and Dan, they know. According to tsome folks, up til august, 
sales were robust at the north beach. Some 90 units sold. See what 
happens when warmer weather approaches. I use sold because we all 
know that until it gets closer to completetion anyone can walk - like 
all those investors should prices soften and rates rise.





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[AsburyPark] Re: NYT article

2006-02-18 Thread Fred
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, dfsavgny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, bluebishop82 bluebishop82@ 
 wrote:
   
  MDSASS knows what the Waterfront is worth they will find 
investors and things will work out. Do you really think they will go 
without a fight? In the end they will give the city what they want 
but the city needs to stay on top of them every inch of the way. 
Furthermore they need some major help with thier Marketing skills. I 
hope the city demands that or someting close to it. They thought they 
needed mass density to make it work, they were wrong and need a new 
plan.You know what they probally already have it.


























 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[AsburyPark] Re: NYT article - Say it ain’t so!

2006-02-18 Thread Fred
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Skip Bernstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 If the City doesn't get rid of the drugs, hookers and The Kingsley 
Deli some people might walk. I have seen  some hookers and dealers 
going into the Deli. If the Deli closes, where will Jerrys kids play? I 
Wonder if Rita will have them playin her house. There goes that 
neighborhood






Some 90 units sold.  I use sold because we all know that until it
 gets closer to completion anyone can walk - like all those investors
 should prices soften and rates rise.
 
 Say it ain't so!  You mean to tell me that all those smart New Yorkers
 might not close on their million dollar bits of SoHo meets South
 Beach?  Who you trying to kid?  
 
 Surely with all the neat cartoons, the great restoration of the
 boardwalk buildings and fabulous yellow paint, not to mention the
 incredibly clever landscaping, so neuvo Hiroshima, who but the genius
 Fishman bro's could have thunk it, do you honestly think these deals
 might not close?  I'm speechless.







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[AsburyPark] Re: NYT article

2006-02-18 Thread Skip Bernstein
MDSASS knows what the Waterfront is worth they will find investors
and things will work out. Furthermore they need some major help with
thier Marketing skills. You know what they probally already have it.

News Flash: 
Fred is Fred Fishman, runt of the litter, raised by a shepherd and his
flock in the hills just south of the Golan heights, recently reunited
with his family of Fish, as a result of a visit to a local hospital,
which involved DNA testing, after being attacked by a pack of wolves,
which left him brain challenged from an infection resulting from
contracting rabies.  

Larry has appointed Fred as point man in The Partners public relations
department.  Therefore, as much as it pains me, I defer to Fred Fish
on all matters Fishman.  

Hence, and I couldn't have said it better, they probally already have
it.






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[AsburyPark] Re: NYT article

2006-02-18 Thread Fred
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Skip Bernstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Isn't there a bar stool calling for you and your best friendThe 
Camera








MDSASS knows what the Waterfront is worth they will find investors
 and things will work out. Furthermore they need some major help with
 thier Marketing skills. You know what they probally already have 
it.
 
 News Flash: 
 Fred is Fred Fishman, runt of the litter, raised by a shepherd and 
his
 flock in the hills just south of the Golan heights, recently 
reunited
 with his family of Fish, as a result of a visit to a local hospital,
 which involved DNA testing, after being attacked by a pack of 
wolves,
 which left him brain challenged from an infection resulting from
 contracting rabies.  
 
 Larry has appointed Fred as point man in The Partners public 
relations
 department.  Therefore, as much as it pains me, I defer to Fred Fish
 on all matters Fishman.  
 
 Hence, and I couldn't have said it better, they probally already 
have
 it.







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[AsburyPark] Re: NYT article

2006-02-18 Thread jerseyjohn99
Any facade of a lack of marketing skills is just that. How can 
someone who appears so incompetent be so successful?

Sass/Lamle are NOT knights in shining armor. They are vulture 
investors. They've built billion dollar fortunes by finding a 
dollars worth of assets selling for 10 cents, then selling that 
asset for 40 cents as fast as possible. 4 times your money in 5 
years isn't bad for anyone. Using conservative leverage that's 20 
times your money in 5 years.

Knowing what the Waterfront is worth and wanting what the Waterfront 
is worth are two different arguments. In an unfavorable business 
climate with only another 2X upside in the next 20 years, some risks 
aren't worth taking. They'll cash out  go look for another Asbury 
Park circa 2001.

I hope council recognizes the vultures position, and milks them for 
everything before they go. 



--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


   MDSASS knows what the Waterfront is worth they will find 
 investors and things will work out. Do you really think they will 
go 
 without a fight? In the end they will give the city what they want 
 but the city needs to stay on top of them every inch of the way. 
 Furthermore they need some major help with thier Marketing skills. 
I 
 hope the city demands that or someting close to it. They thought 
they 
 needed mass density to make it work, they were wrong and need a 
new 
 plan.You know what they probally already have it.








 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [AsburyPark] Re: NYT article - Say i t ain’t so!

2006-02-18 Thread gtscarano212






In a message dated 2/18/2006 7:46:58 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 If 
  the City doesn't get rid of the drugs, hookers and The Kingsley Deli some 
  people might walk. I have seen some hookers and dealers going into 
  the Deli. If the Deli closes, where will Jerrys kids play? I Wonder if 
  Rita will have them playin her house. There goes that 
neighborhood


Fredy fish,
It'sI good thing your a facelesssissy, or other wise Rita could 
smack that ridicules smirk of your face.I myself,was taught not to 
hit a girl. You should work as hard as she does, still has time to contribute to 
her community, and all without being a one note player. I guess you would like 
all her other customers to disappear too, so Larry could land bank some more. 
Your comments shows how afraid of the truth you are.

It's sad when even the sissiesattack old ladies to help Larry. 
Perhaps you are on the city payroll, because anybody who had a real job would 
respect people who work everyday.

You could ofwrote, ifthe cityhad adu diligent 
council that did nottrust Weldon orhire Reidy, Jordon and Aaron, the 
city would not have Hookers, Drug Dealers, and the Partners on a dilapidated 
beachfront in 2006, that would have been a true statement. Then, I would know 
youwere nota shill for Larry.

It is not necessaryto mention and defame Rita's name orher 
businesson this List, since she does not debate with us. If you want to 
say something to her say it to her face.

You got shit on your face.




  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Asbury park home
  
  
Asbury park nj
  
  
Asbury park hotel
  
  


Asbury park foreclosure
  
  
Asbury park real estate
  
  
Asbury park
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "AsburyPark" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









[AsburyPark] Re: NYT article - Say it ain’t so!

2006-02-18 Thread Jim
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In 
AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Skip Bernstein skip@ wrote:   If the City 
doesn't get rid of the drugs, hookers and The Kingsley  Deli some people might 
walk. I have seen  some hookers and dealers  going into the Deli. If the Deli 
closes, where will Jerrys kids play? I  Wonder if Rita will have them playin 
her house. There goes that  neighborhood ~~~Fred, 
What does this City have on the Waterfront to where a person like myself with 
being disable with Epilepsy can walk to for a Gallon of 
milk,newspaper,cerel,snack,juicetc.Nothing ! She keeps up on whats going on 
in this City.Nothing wrong with that.We could use some more of that.Look at the 
Chair she found the City buying tat was over price.She works 7 days a week.If 
everyone kept there mouth shut at City Council meetings the town would be like 
it was with that last City Council that mostly all in Jail.Go back to my 
message 14416 read it think about it lets try to get along here.Grow up.You 
don't even sign your name to your message give out your e-mail what are you 
scare of Fred.Introduce yourself to me sometime.Be a man or women what ever you 
are.Just read message 14416.Hookers  Dealers are going in stores all over 
city.Even in City Hall on Fridays for court.Hiding like you are means you have 
something to hide in my eyes.James GrabePatriot OfficerVeterans AllianceAsbury 
Park N.J. 





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/