Interconnecting Netware Server and Workstation... [7:19911]
Hello, Am having difficulty being able to log into Netware 4.11 Server from a workstation. Setup is this: Netware 4.11 Server Tree: LHS Context: LHS Encapsulation: Ethernet_802.2 Network: EBDCB76E Server is attached to hub which is attached to E0 int on Router_1 We have Windows 2000 Pro Workstation attached to this hub also and can login to and manage server (everything works on local network). Router_1 IPX Routing enabled int E0 has IPX network address of EBDCB76E and encapsulation is SAP int S0 is DCE, clockrate is 56000, IPX net is 10, encap is HDLC ipx router rip network EBDCB76E network 10 Router_2 IPX Routing enabled int E0 has IPX net of 20 and encap is SAP int S1 is DTE, IPX net is 10, encap is HDLC ipx router rip network 10 network 20 Windows 2000 Pro Workstation is attached to E0 on Router_2 and IPX address is 20. Encap is on auto sense with Novell Client 4.8 Now, I can sh ipx servers and see the LHS services. Also, sh ipx routes and I have routes established on both routers. Am I missing something? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19911&t=19911 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Policy Based Routing...."ive had enough and i`m not going [7:19910]
Umm.. it's been a while since I played with access lists, but how about access-list 101 permit ip 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.127 any access-list 102 permit ip 10.10.10.128 0.0.0.127 any JMcL - Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 14/09/2001 03:38 pm - "Jins Varghese"To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Policy Based Routing"ive had Sent by: enough and i`m not going [7:19808] nobody@groups tudy.com 14/09/2001 03:52 am Please respond to "Jins Varghese" Hi, I think the problem is with your access list. Try configuring like this, access-list 101 permit ip 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.127 any access-list 102 permit ip 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255 any Good Luck Jins Varghese wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Memo from Steve Skinner of PricewaterhouseCoopers > > Start of message text > > > > > chaps + chapes`ss > > i am having a slight problem with my Policy based routing config and would > be gratefull for your help.. > > what i am trying to do is this (its quite simple ...it`s just so am i ) > > all user`s are coming in on the 10.10.10.0 subnet (Eth0) ... > > i have two outbound int`s > > 11.11.11.11 (S0) > 12.12.12.12.(bri0) > > what i want to do is split the 10.10.10.0 subnet and policy based route > everything from 10.10.10.1-10.10.10.127 out S0, > and route 10.10.10.128-10.10.10.256 out the bri0 > > this doesn`t seem to be working .here is my config .. > > thanks in advance steve (i have sent this to the right mailing list haven`t > I..?) > > P.S i think it`s the wildcard mask that is stuffedand i also have EIGRP > running on the router (old senario test) > > version 12.2 > service timestamps > debug uptimeservice timestamps > log uptime no > service password-encryption > ! > hostname Router > !! > memory-size iomem 25 > ip subnet-zero > ! > ip audit notify log > ip audit po max-events 100 > call rsvp-sync!! > ! > ! > interface BRI0 no ip address > ip address 12.12.12.12 255.255.255.0 > ip route-cache policy > ip policy route-map POLICY > no shutdown > ! > interface FastEthernet0 > ip address 10.10.10.10 255.255.255.0 > ip route-cache policy (enables fast switching of policy routing...for speed) > ip policy route-map POLICY (create a policy called POLICY) > ! > interface Serial0 > ip address 12.12.12.12 255.255.255.0 > ip route-cache policy (enable fast switching of policy routing) > (create a policy called POLICY) > ! > ip classless > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 12.12.12.20 > no ip http serverip > pim bidir-enable > ! > access-list 101 permit ip 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.128 any > access-list 102 permit ip 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.127 any > > route-map POLICY permit 10 > match ip address 101 > set ip next-hop 11.11.11.20 > ! > route-map POLICY permit 20 > match ip address 102 > set ip next-hop 12.12.12.20 > ! > ! > line con 0 > line aux 0 > line vty 0 4 > ! > no scheduler allocate > end > > > > - End of message text > > The principal place of business of PricewaterhouseCoopers and its associate > partnerships is 1 Embankment Place, London WC2N 6NN where lists of the > partners' names are available for inspection. All partners in the associate > partnerships are authorised to conduct business as agents of, and all > contracts for services to clients are with, PricewaterhouseCoopers. The UK > firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers is authorised by the Institute of Chartered > Accountants in England and Wales to carry on investment business. > PricewaterhouseCoopers is a member of the world-wide > PricewaterhouseCoopers organisation. > > The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to > which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged > material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or > taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or > entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received > this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any > computer. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19910&t=19910 ---
Re: 'It's not the US they want to destroy. It's our arrogance' [7:19909]
Gareth, your message and Priscilla's are the most sensible posts I have seen on this topic. Good luck with the CIT. I should keep my mouth shut now... Except... there are reports here of Islamic community groups having their buildings vandalised and hate messages left on their phones, of women wearing veils being spat at, of Muslim children on a school bus being attacked with stones and bottles. From news reports I know this is also happening in other countries. This really saddens me. Does anyone seriously think that these individuals had anything to do with the terrorists, or that they support the terrorist's actions? I hope everyone focusses on those who organised the terrorism (whoever that may be), not those who are thought to share the same ethnic background, the same religion, or even the same dress sense. Indiscriminate revenge is exactly what the terrorists did - it is not what the response to terrorism should be. JMcL - Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 14/09/2001 02:54 pm - "Gareth Hinton" cc: Sent by:Subject: Re: 'It's not the US they want to [EMAIL PROTECTED]destroy. It's our arrogance' [7:19889] m 14/09/2001 11:31 am Please respond to "Gareth Hinton" He probably wouldn't. I think we would take on the chin, the same criticism that was aimed in your direction. Nobody is perfect. As a Brit who has served in Ireland along side friends shot down by terrorists, I still had a feeling of guilt that we had caused the problems in the first place. That doesn't mean I sympathised with the terrorists. The Brit's have caused their share of suffering over the years, and like most European countries, notably Germany, are beginning to be taught, from a young age, more about our history with less bias. I would say that a few US members of the Group have 'visited' other countries in the last 30 years or so and been in some doubt whether they are doing the 'Right Thing'. We undoubtedly still don't get the whole truth about things going on in the world today. Some of the sights I saw during the Gulf war made me more sympathetic to other nations. Thousands of Iraqi's were pushed into a war by their dictator, having been brainwashed and facing torture or death if they didn't fight, with no weapons, no training, no food, no ammunition, no communications. We were greeted like liberators by the begging, surrendering Iraqi's. When you see the family photographs in the wiped out bunkers it brings it home. Right/Wrong is a close call sometimes and we do tend to pigeon hole entire nations when most of the nation have as much (or probably less) control over their nations policies as you or I. Something needs to be done. I really don't know whether the Gung-Ho approach will do it. The terrorists immediately become Martyrs and rally their nation. That's probably the sole reason that Saddam Hussein is still around today. I have no answers, Which is especially unfortunate as I have a CIT exam in 9 hours. Our British hearts go out to the people of the US during these terrible times. You'll pull through, you always do. ""Curtis Phillips"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I am curious if our non-American friend would attempt to defend the British > government and their history of "foriegn > policy"? > - Original Message - [lots of snippage] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19909&t=19909 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Digi portserver - CAT 5000 [7:19885]
Hi All, I recently purchased a Digi portserver that I use for console access to the console ports on my lab routers/switch. I mainly did this in preparation to allow remote access to my lab. The digi portserver works really well, and I picked it up for only #100 on ebay (16 ports). Anyway, I have made up a bunch of RJ45-RJ45 console cables, and have all the routers working fine. I was using a modem cable to connect the female DB25 on my CAT5000 to the DB9 on my PC. I chopped the DB9 end off the cable, hooked up an RJ45 plug (to the best of my web searching pin out ability) and now I can watch the POST when I turn the switch on, but thats it, it just sits at the EARL test done line, and thats it. Digi International PortServer 16 ATE0 ATS0=1 Catalyst 5000 Power Up Diagnostics Init NVRAM Log LED Test ROM CHKSUM DUAL PORT RAM r/w RAM r/w RAM address test Byte/Word Enable test EARL test EARL test Done I can telnet in, the switch is fine, I just can't see anything via the console cable (that I performance enhanced :) ). Does anyone have the pinouts for this configuration? I used something that sort of looked right, but is obviously not. Cheers, Symon Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19885&t=19885 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Digi portserver - CAT 5000 [7:19886]
In addition to this, I just noticed, I am not getting CTS or DSR lights on the portserver, whereas I do on all the other succesful connections. Symon Hi All, I recently purchased a Digi portserver that I use for console access to the console ports on my lab routers/switch. I mainly did this in preparation to allow remote access to my lab. The digi portserver works really well, and I picked it up for only #100 on ebay (16 ports). Anyway, I have made up a bunch of RJ45-RJ45 console cables, and have all the routers working fine. I was using a modem cable to connect the female DB25 on my CAT5000 to the DB9 on my PC. I chopped the DB9 end off the cable, hooked up an RJ45 plug (to the best of my web searching pin out ability) and now I can watch the POST when I turn the switch on, but thats it, it just sits at the EARL test done line, and thats it. Digi International PortServer 16 ATE0 ATS0=1 Catalyst 5000 Power Up Diagnostics Init NVRAM Log LED Test ROM CHKSUM DUAL PORT RAM r/w RAM r/w RAM address test Byte/Word Enable test EARL test EARL test Done I can telnet in, the switch is fine, I just can't see anything via the console cable (that I performance enhanced :) ). Does anyone have the pinouts for this configuration? I used something that sort of looked right, but is obviously not. Cheers, Symon Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19886&t=19886 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Video/voice over IP [7:19905]
Hm... my topology messed up with the line swapping. Here it goes again: - video conf. camera | Ethernet0 | Router | VIC-2BRI-NT/TE | ISDN cloud | ISDN video conf. camera ""Thomas N."" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Sorry I missed my topology: > > > ISDN video conf. camera > > | > Video conf. camera ---Ethernet0-Router-VIC-2BRI-NT/TEISDN > cloud---ISDN video conf. camera > > | > > AT&T MCU > > > Can my IP conf. video camera talk with ISDN video conf. camera using this > VIC-2BRI-NT/TE module? > > > > > ""Thomas N."" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Hi All, > > > > In my lab scenario, I have an conference video camera that is connected to > > the LAN. On the router, I have a 2600 router with a VIC-2BRI-NT/TE > module. > > This VIC-2BRI-NT/TE mdule is then connected to the a MCU from the ISP > > provider for video conference (say, AT&T). Do you think it is possible to > > implement so that my video conference camera can call the ISP MCU with > ISDN > > lines using the gateway mdule VIC-2BRI-NT/TE? Thanks!!! > > > > Thomas N. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19907&t=19905 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Topic of conversation [7:19891]
This is the Internet! It is available around the world to many different people with even more varied backgrounds and beliefs. We each have our own views and ideas as to the way things do or do not work! This is a discussion group with a very focused common goal which we all seem to share (otherwise we wouldn't subscribe)! If you feel you need to give your opinion about a non related subject please mark it so with OT Thanks, Paul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19891&t=19891 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NAT & PAT Cost & Latency [7:19899]
If you use NAT, you are generally just trying to hide ips, or trying to shovel many ips of one domain (in the mathematical sense) into another smaller domain. If you use NAPT (or the Cisco term, PAT), you are multiplexing connections against ips + ports, instead of just IPs. Of course then you get a many to one cardinality. (hence the concept of "ip sharing"). The problem with this is sometimes people need specific listening ports for certain applications, and this can pose serious problems. So, people may run into "issues" with those applications. Fortunately, cisco has some built in "light-weight" proxying which enables you to use quite a few features with no problems. Most vendors will call this "application support with NAT" (which they really mean NAPT, or Cisco PAT). I generally do not use Cisco's NAPT that often so I do not know the details of which proxies are available. Some applications that will have issues are -Active FTP -Any server application which has a "well-known" incoming port In terms of performance, unless you got one of those really crappy cisco boxes doing a bit more than their feeble processors can dig, there is nearly no performance loss. Essentially, it is like a single ACL hit and then a translation which should be fast (hash table access probably). Your costs will be dealing with the many to smaller many issues (when you run out of static NATs to do, think combo of static NAT for the important ips and PAT to avoid this). Also if you choose to go purely with PAT, be aware of the issues with some applications that are "server like" in nature. Hope this clears some stuff up. Of course, you can always go to... heehe www.cisco.com or any other web site with white papers, AKA ip masquerading for linux ipfilter for openbsd, freebsd, netbsd, solaris, and hp-ux ipfw for freebsd (yeah I know you said no wise cracks, but hey, I could not resist!). At 12:06 AM 9/14/01 -0400, Circusnuts wrote: >Has anyone come across performance specs, statistics, or costs (latency or >otherwise) for NAT & PAT services ??? > >Thanks >Phil > >PS- no wise-acre's please, I know all about www.Cisco.com :o) -Carroll Kong Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19908&t=19899 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Video/voice over IP [7:19905]
Sorry I missed my topology: ISDN video conf. camera | Video conf. camera ---Ethernet0-Router-VIC-2BRI-NT/TEISDN cloud---ISDN video conf. camera | AT&T MCU Can my IP conf. video camera talk with ISDN video conf. camera using this VIC-2BRI-NT/TE module? ""Thomas N."" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi All, > > In my lab scenario, I have an conference video camera that is connected to > the LAN. On the router, I have a 2600 router with a VIC-2BRI-NT/TE module. > This VIC-2BRI-NT/TE mdule is then connected to the a MCU from the ISP > provider for video conference (say, AT&T). Do you think it is possible to > implement so that my video conference camera can call the ISP MCU with ISDN > lines using the gateway mdule VIC-2BRI-NT/TE? Thanks!!! > > Thomas N. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19906&t=19905 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Video/voice over IP [7:19905]
Hi All, In my lab scenario, I have an conference video camera that is connected to the LAN. On the router, I have a 2600 router with a VIC-2BRI-NT/TE module. This VIC-2BRI-NT/TE mdule is then connected to the a MCU from the ISP provider for video conference (say, AT&T). Do you think it is possible to implement so that my video conference camera can call the ISP MCU with ISDN lines using the gateway mdule VIC-2BRI-NT/TE? Thanks!!! Thomas N. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19905&t=19905 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCIE Security [7:19904]
Hi, Has anybody took CCIE security recently? What books/training material do you use? Is there some books like the Exam Cram book? Is there any useful URLs,sample tests? I have passed the Routing Switching exam and working on a security exam. Thanks Michael Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19904&t=19904 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TIME TO STOP RE: 'It's not the US they want to destroy. [7:19903]
C'mon, peeps; this isn't getting anywhere. Any serious political/religious/philosophical/etc discussion sure as hell shouldn't be taking place on a Cisco Study Group mailing list. Take it outside already GM Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19903&t=19903 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Information on building a Pix out of a PC [7:19775]
Unless things have changed in the past year or so, you cannot build a Pix on a PC. The PIX has a proprietary OS, which is specifically touted as NOT being portable to a PC platform. Since the OS is proprietary, it is considered less subject to attack than those sitting on known and vulnerable (MS & unix) operating systems. Hope this helps Joe In a message dated 9/13/01 10:54:23 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: << Anyone have the information for building a Pix box on a PC! Tmuzaina Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19902&t=19775 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IOS image file names [7:19901]
Hi all, First my condolances to the victims of the attack in NewYork and Pentagon. No words can describe that emotion one feels after watching the events live. I wanted to ask about IOS image file namesI have three IOS with extension bin but two IOS have the following names c5200-boot-l.112-17.P and c2500-i-l.112-18.112-18 Can I change the names to noraml .bin files or not? Also, If i wanted to change of the IOS in flash to read/write from read what do i do? Thank all Omer Dar Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19901&t=19901 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TIME TO STOP RE: 'It's not the US they want to destroy. [7:19900]
Karl, you need help, you are sick. It's people like you whom makes it possible for other humans(?) like Usamah bin Muhammad bin Awad bin Ladin to continue his insane mission. I urge all of you to keep the USA bombing incident away from any email list you are on. It will not result in anything good. Cisco rules =) At 00:28 14.09.2001, you wrote: >Dear Apologist for Genocide > >I am perfectly entitled to my opinion and I would simply point out that in >most of the so called Muslim countries I have been to and seen, intolerance >is a watchword for daily life. > >The usual one party states or army states with a poor and ill educated >population mostly led by men who profess their religion and humility before >some god and profit greatly from the poor and the disenfranchised. > >Women are subjugated and mere breeders, young men used as cannon fodder in >some so called holy war which turns out to have more in common with a wallet >than a valuation of human life. > >How dare you complain about insults to a so called religion who's members >excuse their crimes through some so called god and lies. What am I to >expect nowa Fatwah of death (a.k.a. Salman Rushdh) because I have a >contary opinion. You intolerance to the "insults" of your so called >religion are quite simply unbelievable. > >I have fought terrorists and been injured as a result, they (the terrorists) >always excuse themselves through religion when really criminal behaviour and >greed is what they wish to hide. It does not matter whether it is the great >sky god of the Roman Catholic faith and the scum of the IRA or the immature >rantings of the most recent hate filled Mullah. There is the EVIL. > >I strongly suggest that those who are apologists for murder and cannot >tolerate democracy would be very wise at this juncture to hold their >tongues. I can understand why you would not wish this thread to continue as >it might draw attention away from the criminal activities of this so called >murderous cult. I know much of Islam and know down through history how the >concept of Holy War is abused by men time and time again! It is a religion >that has not come out of the middle ages and should have been left there. > >I have the deepest shock at what I have seen and understand clearly how >powerless America was at that instant. There was no mercy and the name of >Allah was invoked...that was evil and until the Muslim world >categorically removes itself from that evil and hands up its >criminals/terrorists then at least I and I think many others will judge it >to be evil. I'm sorry if some faint hearts found this upsettingthe poor >dears..at least they are alive! > >Karl >- Original Message - >From: "Thad Gaston" >To: "hal9001" ; >Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 8:14 PM >Subject: TIME TO STOP RE: 'It's not the US they want to destroy. It's our >arrogance' [7:19819] > > >All and Paul > >As a muslim I would greatly appreciate that any further insults to the >religion of Islam be refrained from this list. And as I have requested >along with Priscilla, that this thread and topic discontinue as it both >distracting and upsetting. > >Best Regards > >-Original Message- >From: hal9001 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 2:49 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: 'It's not the US they want to destroy. It's our arrogance' >[7:19819] > > >Don't you mean the CULT of ALLAH..any so called religion that >encourages >this mayhem is a one way ticket to hell. Its nothing more than an evil >cult! > >Karl >- Original Message - >From: "John Mairs" >To: >Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 6:20 AM >Subject: RE: 'It's not the US they want to destroy. It's our arrogance' >[7:19726] > > >> aaammen! >> >> Allah be paved! >> >> >> --- ed smith wrote: >> > Respectfully I would say,,, let people blow some >> > steam off! Who the hell >> > cares about CISCO right now? >> > >> > Ed >> > >> > >From: "Thad Gaston" >To: "ed smith" , >Subject: RE: >> > 'It's not the US >> > they want to destroy. It's our arrogance' [7:19679] >> > >Date: Wed, 12 Sep >> > 2001 17:59:42 -0400 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Received: >> > from [12.109.97.147] by >> > hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id >> > MHotMailBD69252000344136E8170C6D619313EB0; Wed, 12 >> > Sep 2001 14:56:49 >> > -0700 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 12 Sep 2001 >> > 14:57:36 -0700 >> > >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange >> > V6.0.4417.0 >content-class: >> > urn:content-classes:message >Message-ID: >> > >> > >X-MS-Has-Attach: >X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: >> > >Thread-Topic: 'It's not the US >> > they want to destroy. It's our arrogance' [7:19679] >> > >Thread-Index: >> > AcE71YI1yqc/7joNR3ugD6ApyYlA6wAAC/Bg > >All, > >I >> > would discourage any >> > further post regarding this topic as it becoming >> > >more and more useless >> > and distracting. None of our sentiments are going >> > >to bring back the >> > lives of those that have passed on nor bring about >>
NAT & PAT Cost & Latency [7:19899]
Has anyone come across performance specs, statistics, or costs (latency or otherwise) for NAT & PAT services ??? Thanks Phil PS- no wise-acre's please, I know all about www.Cisco.com :o) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19899&t=19899 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ISDN backup problem [7:19894]
Alvin, If I'm not mistaken you BRI circuits should have two(2) channels. Why not simply set R1 to dial the core on the 1st channel and R2 on the 2nd. Of course you would have to change the configuration on your core router for to support Dialer Profiles so you could receive both calls simultaneously If made the config additions you'll need below. I don't know what routing protocol you're using if any so I'd suggest using floating statics so as long as the primary path is down the ISDN circuit will be the default path out of the network. If there's a dynamic routing protocol(I'm thinking based on the "broadcast" keyword in the BRI config) already running between the "core" router and R1 and R2, I'm assuming the ISDN isn't configured based on you're use of the "backup interface" command. Anyway, just some thoughts and things to consider... NOTE: *** You could look at creating a loopback interface on the core router and using the "ip unnumbered loopback" command under the dialer profiles for each connection this way you maintain the existing IP scheme. The configs for R1 and R2 should stay pretty much the same except R1 will use the # for BRI line 1 on the CORE router and R2 will use the 2nd.. Router_CORE interface BRI4/0 no ip address encapsulation ppp dialer pool-member 1 isdn switch-type basic-net3 ppp authentication chap hold-queue 75 in interface Dialer1 dialer string dialer-group 1 dialer pool 1 isdn switch-type basic-net3 ppp authentication chap hold-queue 75 in b interface Dialer1 dialer string dialer-group 2 dialer pool 1 isdn switch-type basic-net3 ppp authentication chap hold-queue 75 in dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit dialer-list 2 protocol ip list 101 access-list 101 permit ip any any - Original Message - From: "Alvin Chong" To: Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 10:41 PM Subject: ISDN backup problem [7:19894] > Hi all, > > I have a core router connected to 2 other regional > routers, with only 1 ISDN backup. The config is as > below: > > Unfortunately these 2 regional routers down at the > same time and both keep trying to dial up the ISDN > line. The result is both of them unable to get the > connection. What should I do at the very first step? > Pls advice. Thanks > > Router1 > > interface Serial0/0 > backup delay 0 10 > backup interface BRI0/0 > ip address 172.200.100.50 255.255.255.252 > no ip mroute-cache > service-policy output llq > ip rtp header-compression > ! > interface BRI0/0 > ip address 172.200.95.3 255.255.255.240 > encapsulation ppp > dialer map ip 172.200.95.1 name Router_CORE broadcast > 12345678 > dialer load-threshold 20 outbound > dialer-group 1 > isdn switch-type basic-net3 > ppp authentication chap > > > Router2 > > interface Serial0/0 > backup delay 0 10 > backup interface BRI0/0 > ip address 172.200.100.54 255.255.255.252 > no ip mroute-cache > service-policy output llq > ip rtp header-compression > ! > interface BRI0/0 > ip address 172.200.95.2 255.255.255.240 > encapsulation ppp > dialer map ip 172.200.95.1 name Router_CORE broadcast > 12345678 > dialer load-threshold 20 outbound > dialer-group 1 > isdn switch-type basic-net3 > ppp authentication chap > > > Router_CORE > > interface BRI4/0 > ip address 172.200.95.1 255.255.255.240 > encapsulation ppp > dialer map ip 172.200.95.2 name Router1 broadcast > dialer map ip 172.200.95.3 name Router2 broadcast > dialer-group 1 > isdn switch-type basic-net3 > ppp authentication chap > hold-queue 75 in > > > regards > alvin chong > > > __ > Terrorist Attacks on U.S. - How can you help? > Donate cash, emergency relief information > http://dailynews.yahoo.com/fc/US/Emergency_Information/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19898&t=19894 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 'It's not the US they want to destroy. It's our arrogance' [7:19896]
No to agree or disagree with any sides of the arguments here, I commend our good friend Priscilla for this very insightful response. I couldn't agree with you more. As we all know, stress and anger will always drive humans to irresponsible statements and irrational decisions. Again, hopefully people can follow your blueprint here to cope with this tragedy and be the pillars of support for those in great need at this time rather than making premature judgments and justify actions that they otherwise wouldn't dare in a better state of mind. Just my $0.02 worth. No need to start another flame war, please! = > Rob Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: > The original poster was trying to help us see the point of view of the > terrorists. He didn't say that he agreed with them. Understanding their > viewpoint will help us prepare for further evil deeds from them and help us > defeat them. Know thy enemy. This is logical. What the poster didn't > understand is that we are grieving and not ready for logic. > > According to Dr. Elisabeth Kubler-Ross, there are five stages of grief. > > 1. Denial > 2. Anger > 3. Bargaining > 4. Depression > 5. Acceptance > > Many people are still in the anger stage. This is not a good time to be > sending e-mails. They come out all wrong. Let's avoid the topic until > everyone calms down. > > Peace, > > Priscilla > > At 06:57 AM 9/13/01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >How lovely. > > > >Reeta, eloquent drivel disguised as intellectualism is still drivel. I'm > >saddened that you feel the need to rationalize and excuse murder on such a > >scale and by such means. I also find it puts you in the same category as > >those who would commit such atrocities. Interestingly enough, do you think > >you would be able to voice a similar tirade in other parts of the world? > >You speak of us and them, where is it you hail from Reeta? Perhaps you can > >advise us here in America how you handle such "us versus them" issues? > >Hmmm? Oh wait, based on your essay I think I see how you would handle such > >a quandary. > > > >Your ridiculous manifesto is nothing but a thinly veiled approval form for > >the human sewage that committed this act. Your attempt to rationalize it > >sickens me. It's always ever so much easier to cloak things like this in > >terms that make it all seem like an academic exercise. Terrorism is indeed > >about people, as you so stated, and when you have people in this world who > >will stop at nothing to destroy others, or to advance their own fanatical > >beliefs, there are going to be tragic consequences. > > > >I had no intention of responding to this long winded "analysis" of yours, > >it is flawed both logically and factually. As such I will cut short my > >reply. I would certainly hate to seem arrogant. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >"mehrzee@vsnl > > .net"To: > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Priscilla Oppenheimer > http://www.priscilla.com [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of rbains.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19896&t=19896 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ATTN Paul [7:19893]
at the news.groupstudy.com newsserver, there is a groupstudy.sideband newsgroup - Original Message - From: "Jeff Duchin" To: Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 7:20 PM Subject: ATTN Paul [7:19893] > Perhaps we need an OT newsgroup for other related world and tech news? _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19895&t=19893 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ISDN backup problem [7:19894]
Hi all, I have a core router connected to 2 other regional routers, with only 1 ISDN backup. The config is as below: Unfortunately these 2 regional routers down at the same time and both keep trying to dial up the ISDN line. The result is both of them unable to get the connection. What should I do at the very first step? Pls advice. Thanks Router1 interface Serial0/0 backup delay 0 10 backup interface BRI0/0 ip address 172.200.100.50 255.255.255.252 no ip mroute-cache service-policy output llq ip rtp header-compression ! interface BRI0/0 ip address 172.200.95.3 255.255.255.240 encapsulation ppp dialer map ip 172.200.95.1 name Router_CORE broadcast 12345678 dialer load-threshold 20 outbound dialer-group 1 isdn switch-type basic-net3 ppp authentication chap Router2 interface Serial0/0 backup delay 0 10 backup interface BRI0/0 ip address 172.200.100.54 255.255.255.252 no ip mroute-cache service-policy output llq ip rtp header-compression ! interface BRI0/0 ip address 172.200.95.2 255.255.255.240 encapsulation ppp dialer map ip 172.200.95.1 name Router_CORE broadcast 12345678 dialer load-threshold 20 outbound dialer-group 1 isdn switch-type basic-net3 ppp authentication chap Router_CORE interface BRI4/0 ip address 172.200.95.1 255.255.255.240 encapsulation ppp dialer map ip 172.200.95.2 name Router1 broadcast dialer map ip 172.200.95.3 name Router2 broadcast dialer-group 1 isdn switch-type basic-net3 ppp authentication chap hold-queue 75 in regards alvin chong __ Terrorist Attacks on U.S. - How can you help? Donate cash, emergency relief information http://dailynews.yahoo.com/fc/US/Emergency_Information/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19894&t=19894 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ATTN Paul [7:19893]
Perhaps we need an OT newsgroup for other related world and tech news? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19893&t=19893 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TIME TO STOP RE: 'It's not the US they want to destroy. [7:19890]
Thad, just FYI, Islam also sanctioned slavery. In fact, there is evidence that there are people that still practice slavery, specifically having Black African slaves, in the countries of Sudan and Mauritania. Slavery in the Arab, and Muslim worlds was probably never on the scale of what happened in the America's, but it happened nonetheless. It is not hatred to point this out, it is the sad reality of the human race. -Original Message- From: Thad Gaston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 3:47 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: TIME TO STOP RE: 'It's not the US they want to destroy. [7:19879] Karl, It is clear that you are dealing with some serious issues. It is also clear that you are ignorant as to the belief, practice and traditions of Islam and Muslims. What you cleary continue to point back to is the acts of MEN. Ofcourse you as an opportunist would take this time to get on your "soap box". But also as an African American man need I remind you of the attrocities committed on American soil against slaves in the name of "Democracy". So while you ride your high-horse. Let me also remind you that people such as yourself actually perpetuate what is truly a CULT mentality. I take it your solution now is to nuke any muslim in the world. Wipe out the 1 billion plus people that live in all areas and corners of the world. That live, work, and contribute to establish peace. It is sad to see this type of banter and clear dissolution make it to this list and even worse the hatred that is concealed in the hearts of people like you. Thaddeus Gaston PS All, I apologize to all on the list. I will no longer acknowledge this thread. May justice be served to those who are responsible for this act and may the truth of these matter come to light. May Allah have mercy on all of the victims and families of this act. -Original Message- From: hal9001 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 6:14 PM To: Thad Gaston; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TIME TO STOP RE: 'It's not the US they want to destroy. It's our arrogance' [7:19819] Dear Apologist for Genocide I am perfectly entitled to my opinion and I would simply point out that in most of the so called Muslim countries I have been to and seen, intolerance is a watchword for daily life. The usual one party states or army states with a poor and ill educated population mostly led by men who profess their religion and humility before some god and profit greatly from the poor and the disenfranchised. Women are subjugated and mere breeders, young men used as cannon fodder in some so called holy war which turns out to have more in common with a wallet than a valuation of human life. How dare you complain about insults to a so called religion who's members excuse their crimes through some so called god and lies. What am I to expect nowa Fatwah of death (a.k.a. Salman Rushdh) because I have a contary opinion. You intolerance to the "insults" of your so called religion are quite simply unbelievable. I have fought terrorists and been injured as a result, they (the terrorists) always excuse themselves through religion when really criminal behaviour and greed is what they wish to hide. It does not matter whether it is the great sky god of the Roman Catholic faith and the scum of the IRA or the immature rantings of the most recent hate filled Mullah. There is the EVIL. I strongly suggest that those who are apologists for murder and cannot tolerate democracy would be very wise at this juncture to hold their tongues. I can understand why you would not wish this thread to continue as it might draw attention away from the criminal activities of this so called murderous cult. I know much of Islam and know down through history how the concept of Holy War is abused by men time and time again! It is a religion that has not come out of the middle ages and should have been left there. I have the deepest shock at what I have seen and understand clearly how powerless America was at that instant. There was no mercy and the name of Allah was invoked...that was evil and until the Muslim world categorically removes itself from that evil and hands up its criminals/terrorists then at least I and I think many others will judge it to be evil. I'm sorry if some faint hearts found this upsettingthe poor dears..at least they are alive! Karl - Original Message - From: "Thad Gaston" To: "hal9001" ; Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 8:14 PM Subject: TIME TO STOP RE: 'It's not the US they want to destroy. It's our arrogance' [7:19819] All and Paul As a muslim I would greatly appreciate that any further insults to the religion of Islam be refrained from this list. And as I have requested along with Priscilla, that this thread and topic discontinue as it both distracting and upsetting. Best Regards -Original Message- From: hal9001 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, Septembe
Re: 'It's not the US they want to destroy. It's our arrogance' [7:19889]
He probably wouldn't. I think we would take on the chin, the same criticism that was aimed in your direction. Nobody is perfect. As a Brit who has served in Ireland along side friends shot down by terrorists, I still had a feeling of guilt that we had caused the problems in the first place. That doesn't mean I sympathised with the terrorists. The Brit's have caused their share of suffering over the years, and like most European countries, notably Germany, are beginning to be taught, from a young age, more about our history with less bias. I would say that a few US members of the Group have 'visited' other countries in the last 30 years or so and been in some doubt whether they are doing the 'Right Thing'. We undoubtedly still don't get the whole truth about things going on in the world today. Some of the sights I saw during the Gulf war made me more sympathetic to other nations. Thousands of Iraqi's were pushed into a war by their dictator, having been brainwashed and facing torture or death if they didn't fight, with no weapons, no training, no food, no ammunition, no communications. We were greeted like liberators by the begging, surrendering Iraqi's. When you see the family photographs in the wiped out bunkers it brings it home. Right/Wrong is a close call sometimes and we do tend to pigeon hole entire nations when most of the nation have as much (or probably less) control over their nations policies as you or I. Something needs to be done. I really don't know whether the Gung-Ho approach will do it. The terrorists immediately become Martyrs and rally their nation. That's probably the sole reason that Saddam Hussein is still around today. I have no answers, Which is especially unfortunate as I have a CIT exam in 9 hours. Our British hearts go out to the people of the US during these terrible times. You'll pull through, you always do. ""Curtis Phillips"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I am curious if our non-American friend would attempt to defend the British > government and their history of "foriegn > policy"? > - Original Message - > From: "A non-American" > To: > Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 1:20 PM > Subject: RE: 'It's not the US they want to destroy. It's our arrogance' > [7:19805] > > > > Gutless ? What cause would you train months for with a guarantee of death > or > > life imprisonment ? > > > > The facts as I see them are - > > > > A. the victims were blameless and deserved nothing of what they received. > My > > heart goes out especially to the rescue crews, imagine dying trying to > help! > > > > B. the organisation and commitment was amazing, in a nuclear world > > retaliation must be very precise and fully calculated rather than > knee-jerk. > > Do not underestimate these people, it would be very dumb indeed to assume > > that they are less intelligent than yourselves. > > > > C. many reading this will not like this but the actions of the US > government > > for decades has been in the interest of the US and much blood has been > spilt > > by them and 3rd parties funded by them. Is the hatred you feel for your > > attackers of your people less valid than theirs ? What attack against > these > > people would you find unacceptable ? The gloves are off - no ? Somebody > else > > out there feels this against your country. The US must try and find these > > people to make them answer for this but must also look inwards at the same > > time!! priority is to stop it happening again no ? Look at the tit for tat > > mess Israel is in... > > > > I'm English and for a long time American money has paid for bullets and > > semtex used in my country - children are dead as are many policemen not to > > mention the civilians popped off because they have the wrong religion. The > > level of ignorance in the US is truly amazing, everybody outside the US is > > disgusted by this act but not many are asking why, we've got a pretty good > > idea. > > > > Word of advice - we get CNN too and it's biased as hell, listen to the > news > > from somewhere ANYWHERE else once in a while. > > > > A non-American > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > > Fenech, William J > > Sent: 13 September 2001 01:55 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: 'It's not the US they want to destroy. It's our arrogance' > > [7:19699] > > > > > > Don't waste your time with idiots like this (aka Reeta Sinha). The people > > who pulled off this gutless act, and the ones who support them should be > > exterminated, pure and simple. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19889&t=19889 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco PIX [7:19888]
Hi Mike Please count me in please, I have access to a CCO account. Thanks Herb ""mike johnson"" wrote in message > > > ... > > > > Hi Everyone, > > > > > > > > For those who are interested in learning Cisco PIX but > > > > do NOT want to spend a lot of money on buying an > > > > expensive PIX Firewall, I think I can help you. I > > > > have instructions on how to build a PIX firewall by > > > > using a PC. In case you didn't know, PIX firewall is Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19888&t=19888 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 'It's not the US they want to destroy. It's our arrogance' [7:19887]
Several points here A. I don't underestimate these people, not at all. They have shown what they are capable of. I want to annihilate them, exterminate them, whatever euphemism you prefer, by any means necessary. Incidentally, you mention we live in a Nuclear world. If these filth had Nuclear weapons, they would not for a second hesitate to use them. After the events of two days ago, if you honestly believe that they wouldn't use nukes, or chemicals, or anthrax, you are an abject idiot. B. If you think that the US is responsible for the IRA and the Protestants killing each other in Northern Ireland, you are seriously deluding yourself. That all goes back to way before the United States came into existence. C. The US must look inwards??? Thats some great hyperbole. Were the US and Britain looking inwards during World War II when we were firebombing Dresden and Hamburg? Were they asking themselves, "What could we possibly have done to provoke Hitler into invading most of Europe, into commiting such horrible atrocities? Where does his pain come from? What is this war of ours going to solve?" We weren't asking ourselves that, and we shouldn't have been. That was war, as is what this is. And if you give me this horsecrap about how these situations aren't comparable, I will tell you that these people, if they had the ability, would push the nation of Israel into the Mediterranean, just as they would destroy us. D. I'm a shortwave radio listener, so I hear a lot of non-US mediathe BBC, Radio Nederlands, Radio Havana, others, you name it (actually, you can pick up the BBC on local FM stations around here). I'm fully aware of many of the actions and policies of the US government, and also fully aware of how other countries view us, like us, hate us, whatever. I know why terrorists from the Middle-East hate us. They think we are anti-Islam (despite the fact that we fought the Serbs to help the Bosnian Muslims and the Kosovar Albanian Muslims, what a joke that was) they don't like the fact we support Israel, its an affront to them that we have military personnel in Saudi Arabia, blah, blah, blah. None of the above justifies what happened in New York. None of it. To stop it from happening again, these people must die. Because if they are not wiped out, it will happen again. Guaranteed. -Original Message- From: A non-American [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 10:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: 'It's not the US they want to destroy. It's our arrogance' [7:19805] Gutless ? What cause would you train months for with a guarantee of death or life imprisonment ? The facts as I see them are - A. the victims were blameless and deserved nothing of what they received. My heart goes out especially to the rescue crews, imagine dying trying to help! B. the organisation and commitment was amazing, in a nuclear world retaliation must be very precise and fully calculated rather than knee-jerk. Do not underestimate these people, it would be very dumb indeed to assume that they are less intelligent than yourselves. C. many reading this will not like this but the actions of the US government for decades has been in the interest of the US and much blood has been spilt by them and 3rd parties funded by them. Is the hatred you feel for your attackers of your people less valid than theirs ? What attack against these people would you find unacceptable ? The gloves are off - no ? Somebody else out there feels this against your country. The US must try and find these people to make them answer for this but must also look inwards at the same time!! priority is to stop it happening again no ? Look at the tit for tat mess Israel is in... I'm English and for a long time American money has paid for bullets and semtex used in my country - children are dead as are many policemen not to mention the civilians popped off because they have the wrong religion. The level of ignorance in the US is truly amazing, everybody outside the US is disgusted by this act but not many are asking why, we've got a pretty good idea. Word of advice - we get CNN too and it's biased as hell, listen to the news from somewhere ANYWHERE else once in a while. A non-American -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Fenech, William J Sent: 13 September 2001 01:55 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: 'It's not the US they want to destroy. It's our arrogance' [7:19699] Don't waste your time with idiots like this (aka Reeta Sinha). The people who pulled off this gutless act, and the ones who support them should be exterminated, pure and simple. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19887&t=19887 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Alteon Switch manual [7:19861]
Ali;Alteon Webstystems was bought by Nortel Networks about a year ago. The best place to go looking for documentation would be:http://support.alteonwebsystems.com/dest/LoginYou will either need an authorised login or may register for 90 days of free access if you have purchased the product. You will be asked what product you purchased and asked to provide MAC Addresses.--- Ali Mesdaq wrote:> Hello,> Does anyone have the manual in pdf format of the> Alteon switch model AD2. If> anyone knows of a site please let me know.> Thanks> > > > > Message Posted at:> http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19861&t=19861> --> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Terrorist Attacks on U.S. - How can you help? Donate cash, emergency relief information inYahoo! News. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19884&t=19861 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco VPN Client [7:19858]
Looks like it's a split-tunnel problem. Once you lunch VPN, all traffic will be encrypted, other local machines couldn't decrypt the data. You can enable split-tunnel on 3000, tell it only traffic to your main office needs to be encrypted. HTH. Jim --- George Kallingal wrote: > I have a question about the Cisco VPN Client > software and how it binds its > driver to a network card. > > We have an NT server that we are connecting to a > remote network using the > Cisco VPN Client (to a Concentrator 3000, I > believe). Upon connection > through the VPN, I lose connectivity to the other > servers on the local > network. Is there a way to maintain the local area > connection while > connected over VPN? I tried to multi-home the > server and unbind the DNE > driver for one network card, but that just disabled > the network card. > > Has anyone experienced this before? Are there any > workarounds? Fixes? Or > does this require a call to Cisco TAC? > > Thanks. > > George [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger http://im.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19883&t=19858 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco VPN Client [7:19858]
As opposed to the Nortel Extranet client (which allows local and VPN network access), the Cisco (nee Altiga) client completely binds the interface when the tunnel is up. I experimented with this particular problem in December for the same capability (access to local and remote-over-VPN servers), and Cisco at the time said that 'split tunnelling' would be a future feature. (We therefore went with the Nortel Extranet solution) They may have changed their position, but the client was not written to support that function. I use the Extranet client for remote access to my corporate network now, and I'm glad that the split tunnelling is enabled - allows me to read my work email and access work servers, with direct access to the Internet (small improvement in latency when compared to going through my Corporate net, and probably a 'bandwidth savings' - if no split tunnel, my Internet traffic would hit our Corporate Internet Access connection 4 times...one inbound request, one outbound request, one inbound response, one outbound response). Our CorpNet folks are going to start providing personal firewall software for us, though, exactly for the security reason mentioned below. - Original Message - From: "Chuck Larrieu" To: Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 2:57 PM Subject: RE: Cisco VPN Client [7:19858] > sounds like a split tunnel issue. I believe split tunneling is turned off by > default. > > if this is the case, here is the explanation: > > the model for VPN is a user station connecting to a corporate network > through the internet. There is an issue with having an open internet net > connection on a remote user machine while connected via a VPN to the Corp > net. the user machine can be compromised by an internet hacker, who then has > access to corporate through the user connection. > > split tunnel is the term for this situation - having an open connection to > the local internet at the same time one has a secure connection via a VPN > tunnel. Because this is considered a real security risk, most VPN client > software turns this feature off by default. > > you should be able to find the required settings in the config guide, so you > can permit split tunneling. > > although I gotta say, if I understand you correctly, you would be opening up > your server to compromise from the internet. why not do the VPN tunnel > through an edge device, like a router? Site to site VPN? > > HTH > > Chuck > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > George Kallingal > Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 2:31 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Cisco VPN Client [7:19858] > > > I have a question about the Cisco VPN Client software and how it binds its > driver to a network card. > > We have an NT server that we are connecting to a remote network using the > Cisco VPN Client (to a Concentrator 3000, I believe). Upon connection > through the VPN, I lose connectivity to the other servers on the local > network. Is there a way to maintain the local area connection while > connected over VPN? I tried to multi-home the server and unbind the DNE > driver for one network card, but that just disabled the network card. > > Has anyone experienced this before? Are there any workarounds? Fixes? Or > does this require a call to Cisco TAC? > > Thanks. > > George _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19882&t=19858 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HSRP/Spanning Tree issue??? [7:19639]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Configs attached Blake - -Original Message- From: Michael L. Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 5:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: HSRP/Spanning Tree issue??? [7:19639] You are correct that, not only should it work, but you don't need Spanning Tree unless you have more than one connection between the two switches. As an aside, make sure you are trunking on the link between the two switches.. - From what you're described, I don't see why this wouldn't work. Can you e-mail me a copy of your configs (from the two 7200s and 3548s). Perhaps that might help. Mike W. "TRAISTER, BLAKE (SBCI)" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > > I have 2 Cisco 7200s, with 3 interfaces. We will call them > routerleft and routerright. They are connected via their ethernet > interfaces to 2 switches: Catalyst 3548XLs, switchleft and > switchright. The switches are divided into 3 vlans each: vlan1, > vlan2, vlan3. The switches are connected via their Gi ports > (essentially to mirror each other. > > So > > Router right fa1/0 goes to switchright:port 1, vlan 1, fa 1/1 to > port 1, vlan2 (port 17), and fa 2/1 to port 1, vlan3 (port 33). > Router left fa1/0 goes to switchleft:port 1, vlan 1, fa 1/1 to port > 1, vlan2 (port 17), and fa 2/1 to port 1, vlan3 (port 33). > > Each router interface is running HSRP...so routerright fa 1/0 is > hsrp with router left fa 1/0 and so on with each interface > > Router right interfaces have priority preempt set to 120 and router > left has priority preempt 100 > > We are doing just fine until I plug router right into the switch > right interfacesObviously there is a spanning tree loops and > ports start blocking. > > So then...I turn off spanning tree in all vlansand the hsrp > starts flapping.every 2 minutes or so there is a 30 second > state change... > > Is there some way I can get the routers to shut up...let one be > active the other be standby and still have everything connected? I > currently do it with Extreme Summit 48s..spanning tree is > completely offand its works fine... > > Thanks! > > Blake > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use > > iQA/AwUBO5+db5jWtn+JGXXMEQK4OwCgypBjQX7CXGKJ+qv+JvLoOt4Yxm4Ani9N > 7KHMrR92fJ/sx4p43O8BJgZ4 > =x6bZ > -END PGP SIGNATURE- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use iQA/AwUBO6E4xZjWtn+JGXXMEQJ5MQCggJ2ttm+eMg7mMpaYDcUipJOu3cAAn3zA jTqjYBqIO7tsvd3t3Ij8VEen =ZewW -END PGP SIGNATURE- P -- show running-config -- Building configuration... Current configuration : 1820 bytes ! version 12.1 service tcp-keepalives-in service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname flight-r2 ! enable secret 5 enable password ! ! ! ! ! ip subnet-zero ! ! ! ! ! ! interface FastEthernet0/0 description Test to local lan ip address 216.65.215.120 255.255.255.240 shutdown half-duplex ! interface FastEthernet1/0 description to PIX inside ip address 216.154.239.253 255.255.255.0 no ip redirects duplex auto speed auto standby 3 timers 10 40 standby 3 priority 100 preempt standby 3 ip 216.154.239.254 ! interface FastEthernet1/1 description to http layer ip address 192.168.240.253 255.255.255.0 no ip redirects duplex auto speed auto standby 5 priority 100 preempt standby 5 ip 192.168.240.254 ! interface FastEthernet2/0 ip address 192.168.241.253 255.255.255.0 no ip redirects speed auto full-duplex no mop enabled standby 7 priority 100 preempt standby 7 ip 192.168.241.254 ! interface FastEthernet2/1 no ip address shutdown duplex auto speed auto ! interface Serial3/0 ip address 192.168.242.2 255.255.255.0 fair-queue serial restart-delay 0 ! interface Serial3/1 no ip address shutdown serial restart-delay 0 ! interface Serial3/2 no ip address shutdown serial restart-delay 0 ! interface Serial3/3 no ip address shutdown serial restart-delay 0 ! router eigrp 10 redistribute static network 192.168.240.0 network 192.168.241.0 network 192.168.242.0 network 192.168.248.0 network 216.154.239.0 auto-summary eigrp log-neighbor-changes ! ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 216.154.239.249 ip route 206.170.129.192 255.255.255.192 192.168.242.1 no ip http server ! no cdp run snmp-server community RO ! ! line con 0 line aux 0 line vty 0 4 password login ! end Building configuration... Current configuration: ! version 12.0 no service pad service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname idc-switch1 ! enable secret 5 ! ! ! ! ! ! ip subnet-zero ! ! ! interface FastEthernet0/1 ! interface FastEthernet0/2 ! interface FastEthernet0/3 spanning-tree portfast ! interfa
Re: Dual FIFO? [7:19691]
You may be correct but I don't know how this would work. What populates each queue? Do fragmented packets go in one and non-fragmented in the other? That doesn't make much sense to me. However, upon more reflection maybe it does make some sense. If the voice packets aren't fragmented then they'd all end up in one queue while all other traffic that was fragmented would be in the other. Within a queue FIFO rules would apply and the queues would be serviced in a round robin fashion. This would allow more frequent attention to the voice packets. Now, what happens when I also have LLQ configured?? In that case you have two classes: one for voice which gets a strict priority queue and the other for everything else. I have WFQ applied to the second class. How does dual FIFO apply here? I just don't see how LLQ (or CBWFQ), WFQ, and dual FIFO can work together. In light of recent events, my mind has used up a lot of its processing power on other things. Perhaps it's just too depleted to comprehend this yet. Actually, I just need a really good nap. Thanks, John On Thu, 13 Sep 2001 17:57:14 -0400, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: | Voice is in a different queue than data, so there are two queues (hence the | dual)?? | | At 03:09 PM 9/13/01, John Neiberger wrote: | >I understand that concept but I haven't been able to connect that to the | >dual FIFO queue. How does fragmentation relate to the dual queue? If I | >follow Cisco's suggestion and use a fragmentation size of 1600 then no | >fragmentation is actually occurring, yet the dual FIFO queue is | >implemented. | > | >I have this nagging feeling that I'm just missing something that I | >should have figured out by now. | | Or maybe the documentation writer was just missing something?? ;-) | | Priscilla | | | >Thanks, | >John | > | > >>> "MADMAN" 9/13/01 9:01:55 AM >>> | >The bottom line is you fragment data packets, never voice, so that a | >voice packets, which are small, never get queued behind a 1500 byte | >packet. The rule of thumb I think is you don't want more than 150ms | >delay in any voice packets or you may as well dump it. | > | > dave | > | >Stephen Skinner wrote: | > > | > > the only thing i could find was this | > > | > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/788/voice-qos/voip-ov-fr-qos.pdf | > > | > > which says | > > | > > "Turn on fragmentation for low speed links (less than 1.5Mbps). | > > Set the fragment size so voice packets are not fragmented and do not | > > experience a serialization delay greater than 20 ms. | > > | > > Lowest Link Speed in Path Recommended Fragmentation Size | > > | > > 56Kbps 70 bytes | > > 64Kbps 80 bytes | > > 128Kbps 160 bytes | > > 256Kbps 320 bytes | > > 512Kbps 640 bytes | > > 768Kbps 1000 bytes | > > 1536Kbps 1600 bytes | > > | > > Note: For 1536 Kbps, no fragmentation is technically needed, but | > > fragmentation is needed to enable the dual first-in, first-out | > > (FIFO) queueing system to ensure voice quality. A fragment size of | >1600 | > > bytes enables the dual FIFO, but since 1600 bytes is | > > higher than the typical serial interface maximum transmission unit | >(MTU), | > > large data packets are not fragmented. | > > | > > from what it says it`s just multple "stack" queue | > > | > > sorry i can`t be of more help.. | > > | > > Cheers | > > | > > steve | > > >From: "John Neiberger" | > > >Reply-To: "John Neiberger" | > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | > > >Subject: Dual FIFO? [7:19691] | > > >Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 18:34:53 -0400 | > > > | > > >When configuring VoIP on T-1 links, I see that CCO suggests turning | >on | > > >frame relay fragmentation with a fragment size of 1600 simply to | >turn on | > > >the dual fifo queue. What is that? I'm familiar with the single | >fifo | > > >but what is dual fifo and how does it work? | > > > | > > >I've searched CCO and all I can find is how to turn it on. I have | >yet | > > >to find any sort of explanation. | > > > | > > >thanks! | > > > | > > >John | > > _ | > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at | >http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp | >-- | >David Madland | >Sr. Network Engineer | >CCIE# 2016 | >Qwest Communications Int. Inc. | >[EMAIL PROTECTED] | >612-664-3367 | > | >"Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" | | | Priscilla Oppenheimer | http://www.priscilla.com | | | | ___ http://inbox.excite.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19880&t=19691 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TIME TO STOP RE: 'It's not the US they want to destroy. [7:19879]
Karl, It is clear that you are dealing with some serious issues. It is also clear that you are ignorant as to the belief, practice and traditions of Islam and Muslims. What you cleary continue to point back to is the acts of MEN. Ofcourse you as an opportunist would take this time to get on your "soap box". But also as an African American man need I remind you of the attrocities committed on American soil against slaves in the name of "Democracy". So while you ride your high-horse. Let me also remind you that people such as yourself actually perpetuate what is truly a CULT mentality. I take it your solution now is to nuke any muslim in the world. Wipe out the 1 billion plus people that live in all areas and corners of the world. That live, work, and contribute to establish peace. It is sad to see this type of banter and clear dissolution make it to this list and even worse the hatred that is concealed in the hearts of people like you. Thaddeus Gaston PS All, I apologize to all on the list. I will no longer acknowledge this thread. May justice be served to those who are responsible for this act and may the truth of these matter come to light. May Allah have mercy on all of the victims and families of this act. -Original Message- From: hal9001 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 6:14 PM To: Thad Gaston; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TIME TO STOP RE: 'It's not the US they want to destroy. It's our arrogance' [7:19819] Dear Apologist for Genocide I am perfectly entitled to my opinion and I would simply point out that in most of the so called Muslim countries I have been to and seen, intolerance is a watchword for daily life. The usual one party states or army states with a poor and ill educated population mostly led by men who profess their religion and humility before some god and profit greatly from the poor and the disenfranchised. Women are subjugated and mere breeders, young men used as cannon fodder in some so called holy war which turns out to have more in common with a wallet than a valuation of human life. How dare you complain about insults to a so called religion who's members excuse their crimes through some so called god and lies. What am I to expect nowa Fatwah of death (a.k.a. Salman Rushdh) because I have a contary opinion. You intolerance to the "insults" of your so called religion are quite simply unbelievable. I have fought terrorists and been injured as a result, they (the terrorists) always excuse themselves through religion when really criminal behaviour and greed is what they wish to hide. It does not matter whether it is the great sky god of the Roman Catholic faith and the scum of the IRA or the immature rantings of the most recent hate filled Mullah. There is the EVIL. I strongly suggest that those who are apologists for murder and cannot tolerate democracy would be very wise at this juncture to hold their tongues. I can understand why you would not wish this thread to continue as it might draw attention away from the criminal activities of this so called murderous cult. I know much of Islam and know down through history how the concept of Holy War is abused by men time and time again! It is a religion that has not come out of the middle ages and should have been left there. I have the deepest shock at what I have seen and understand clearly how powerless America was at that instant. There was no mercy and the name of Allah was invoked...that was evil and until the Muslim world categorically removes itself from that evil and hands up its criminals/terrorists then at least I and I think many others will judge it to be evil. I'm sorry if some faint hearts found this upsettingthe poor dears..at least they are alive! Karl - Original Message - From: "Thad Gaston" To: "hal9001" ; Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 8:14 PM Subject: TIME TO STOP RE: 'It's not the US they want to destroy. It's our arrogance' [7:19819] All and Paul As a muslim I would greatly appreciate that any further insults to the religion of Islam be refrained from this list. And as I have requested along with Priscilla, that this thread and topic discontinue as it both distracting and upsetting. Best Regards -Original Message- From: hal9001 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 2:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 'It's not the US they want to destroy. It's our arrogance' [7:19819] Don't you mean the CULT of ALLAH..any so called religion that encourages this mayhem is a one way ticket to hell. Its nothing more than an evil cult! Karl - Original Message - From: "John Mairs" To: Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 6:20 AM Subject: RE: 'It's not the US they want to destroy. It's our arrogance' [7:19726] > aaammen! > > Allah be paved! > > > --- ed smith wrote: > > Respectfully I would say,,, let people blow some > > steam off! Who the hell > > cares about CISCO right now? > > >
Re: PPP password [7:19837]
Hi, I think you will find once it is encrypted it will stay encrypted. To avoid it becoming encrypted you can use router#no service password=encryption however be aware enable and login passwords might also be visable. There is a program that allows one to decrypt passwords excluding the "secret" password IE encrypted passwords that are identified with a "7". Just a thought Teunis, Hobart, Tasmania Australia On Thursday, September 13, 2001 at 04:10:05 PM, Andy Barkl wrote: > I need to display the PPP password on my ISDN link. > > In the enable mode can I turn off some type of encryption to then display > the encrypted password? -- www.tasmail.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19878&t=19837 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Multiple ISDN devices [7:19740]
Hi, As each is set up it gets a TEI (Terminal End Identifier) these are used to identify each device. You can have up to 8 devices connected as I understand it. Teunis Hobart, Tasmania Australia On Thursday, September 13, 2001 at 08:07:49 AM, Lists Wizard wrote: > Hello group, > > I am studying for the CIT exam and I have a question > regarding multiple isdn devices sharing a single bri > connection. Assuming a router and ISDN phone sharing a > the same s/t bus, how should I Identify each device so > that when a phone comes in the router does not > respond. Assume that I have only one phone number > assigned by the ISDN service provider. A configuration > sample will be highly appreciated. > > Thanks > Lw > > __ > Terrorist Attacks on U.S. - How can you help? > Donate cash, emergency relief information > http://dailynews.yahoo.com/fc/US/Emergency_Information/ -- www.tasmail.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19877&t=19740 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [7:18833]
Mike, It appears that your message got deleted, but please add me to your list as well, whenever you get this. Thanks! Geoff Mossburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 4:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [7:18833] [demime could not interpret encoding binary - treating as plain text] Please put my name in your list. I'm interested too. thanks sipitung - Pada Tue, 11 Sep 2001 03:28:31 -0400 "Hehdili Nizar" menulis: > Hi > I m interested too > "Ali Mesdaq" a icrit dans le message : > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I don't have the parts but I would love if you kept the list up to date > and > > when I do get the parts I can follow what you guys did on the list. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Katsagianni Natasa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 11:46 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: =?iso-8859-7?Q?=C1=D0=3A_how_to_build_a_pix_firewall_out_of_a_? > > [7:18761] > > > > > > count me in too.. > > > > > > > ""mike johnson"" wrote in message > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > Hi Everyone, > > > > > > > > For those who are interested in learning Cisco PIX but > > > > do NOT want to spend a lot of money on buying an > > > > expensive PIX Firewall, I think I can help you. I > > > > have instructions on how to build a PIX firewall by > > > > using a PC. In case you didn't know, PIX firewall is > > > > essentially a PC with multiple interfaces. I've > > > > successfully built several PIX firewall using my old > > > > PCs (i.e. pentium 200 MHz processor). Actually, the > > > > PIX1 series (obsolete I know) is a PC with Intel > > > > EtherExpress Interface cards. However, you must have > > > > an account with CCO in order the software and download > > > > the software. The rest of the instructions on how to > > > > build a PIX firewall using PC is very simple. Anyone > > > > interested in learning it, let me know. > > > > > > > > Mike > > > > > > > > __ > > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > > Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! > > > Messenger > > > > http://im.yahoo.com http://www.eKilat.com emailnya Indonesia! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19874&t=18833 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TIME TO STOP RE: 'It's not the US they want to destroy. [7:19876]
Dear Apologist for Genocide I am perfectly entitled to my opinion and I would simply point out that in most of the so called Muslim countries I have been to and seen, intolerance is a watchword for daily life. The usual one party states or army states with a poor and ill educated population mostly led by men who profess their religion and humility before some god and profit greatly from the poor and the disenfranchised. Women are subjugated and mere breeders, young men used as cannon fodder in some so called holy war which turns out to have more in common with a wallet than a valuation of human life. How dare you complain about insults to a so called religion who's members excuse their crimes through some so called god and lies. What am I to expect nowa Fatwah of death (a.k.a. Salman Rushdh) because I have a contary opinion. You intolerance to the "insults" of your so called religion are quite simply unbelievable. I have fought terrorists and been injured as a result, they (the terrorists) always excuse themselves through religion when really criminal behaviour and greed is what they wish to hide. It does not matter whether it is the great sky god of the Roman Catholic faith and the scum of the IRA or the immature rantings of the most recent hate filled Mullah. There is the EVIL. I strongly suggest that those who are apologists for murder and cannot tolerate democracy would be very wise at this juncture to hold their tongues. I can understand why you would not wish this thread to continue as it might draw attention away from the criminal activities of this so called murderous cult. I know much of Islam and know down through history how the concept of Holy War is abused by men time and time again! It is a religion that has not come out of the middle ages and should have been left there. I have the deepest shock at what I have seen and understand clearly how powerless America was at that instant. There was no mercy and the name of Allah was invoked...that was evil and until the Muslim world categorically removes itself from that evil and hands up its criminals/terrorists then at least I and I think many others will judge it to be evil. I'm sorry if some faint hearts found this upsettingthe poor dears..at least they are alive! Karl - Original Message - From: "Thad Gaston" To: "hal9001" ; Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 8:14 PM Subject: TIME TO STOP RE: 'It's not the US they want to destroy. It's our arrogance' [7:19819] All and Paul As a muslim I would greatly appreciate that any further insults to the religion of Islam be refrained from this list. And as I have requested along with Priscilla, that this thread and topic discontinue as it both distracting and upsetting. Best Regards -Original Message- From: hal9001 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 2:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 'It's not the US they want to destroy. It's our arrogance' [7:19819] Don't you mean the CULT of ALLAH..any so called religion that encourages this mayhem is a one way ticket to hell. Its nothing more than an evil cult! Karl - Original Message - From: "John Mairs" To: Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 6:20 AM Subject: RE: 'It's not the US they want to destroy. It's our arrogance' [7:19726] > aaammen! > > Allah be paved! > > > --- ed smith wrote: > > Respectfully I would say,,, let people blow some > > steam off! Who the hell > > cares about CISCO right now? > > > > Ed > > > > >From: "Thad Gaston" >To: "ed smith" , >Subject: RE: > > 'It's not the US > > they want to destroy. It's our arrogance' [7:19679] > > >Date: Wed, 12 Sep > > 2001 17:59:42 -0400 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Received: > > from [12.109.97.147] by > > hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id > > MHotMailBD69252000344136E8170C6D619313EB0; Wed, 12 > > Sep 2001 14:56:49 > > -0700 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 12 Sep 2001 > > 14:57:36 -0700 > > >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange > > V6.0.4417.0 >content-class: > > urn:content-classes:message >Message-ID: > > > > >X-MS-Has-Attach: >X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: > > >Thread-Topic: 'It's not the US > > they want to destroy. It's our arrogance' [7:19679] > > >Thread-Index: > > AcE71YI1yqc/7joNR3ugD6ApyYlA6wAAC/Bg > >All, > >I > > would discourage any > > further post regarding this topic as it becoming > > >more and more useless > > and distracting. None of our sentiments are going > > >to bring back the > > lives of those that have passed on nor bring about > > the >justice the we > > all would like to see. Let's keep the list on track > > and >get back to what > > this list is intended for. > >Regards, > >Thad > > Gaston > >-Original > > Message- >From: ed smith > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: > > Wednesday, September 12, 2001 5:36 PM >To: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: > > Re: 'It's not the US they want to destroy. It's our > > arrogance' >[7:19679] > > > > >That is the biggest load of crap I've ever > > heard
FW: PLEASE READ!!!! and pass on [7:19875]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 5:30 PM > To: mass > Subject: FW: PLEASE READ and pass on > > > Tomorrow is U.S. Color day. Red, White & Blue should be worn in honor of > our > fellow Americans that died. Jeans > worn will be blue. The goal is to get the whole nation to patricipate. > Send > this to 10 other people. > > In memory of all those who perished; the passengers and the > pilots on the United Air and AA flights, the workers in the World Trade > Center and the Pentagon, and all the innocent bystanders. Our prayers go > out > to the friends and families of the deceased. Send this to at least 10 > people > to show your support. DONT BREAK IT!! God's speed to all those who > have > lost their lives...GOD BLESS AMERICA and the freedom it represents > tomorrow is US pride day, everyone wear US colors (jeans are blue, everyone > owns a white t-shirt, etc). try to be wearing as much red white and blue > as > you can. send this message to as many other people you know. Lets get the > whole country into it. At least send it to 10 other people > > Categories: > (See attached file: pic13855.pcx) > (See attached file: pic16617.pcx) > > > > -- End of Forwarded Message Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19875&t=19875 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Back to Back ISDN Solution [7:19860]
Congratulations and thanks for posting the configuration. To your statement at the bottom, those of us who are CCIE Lab candidates care about ppp multilink, but we do share in your excitement. - Original Message - From: "Rick Harville" To: Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 2:38 PM Subject: Back to Back ISDN Solution [7:19860] > Thanks for all who responded. Combining everyones posts I was able to put > together a config that now works. > > For the record: > > You can indeed use a single ISDN line to connect two routers together to > practice your ISDN configs. This config was tested using two C2503 routers, > a single motorola NT1 w/2 ST ports and a single U port. The line was a > standard ISDN line from SWBell. > > r3 > interface BRI0 > ip address 133.2.9.2 255.255.255.252 > no ip directed-broadcast > encapsulation ppp > no keepalive > dialer string 7133169437 > dialer-group 1 > isdn switch-type basic-ni > isdn spid1 71331694360101 > > r5 > > interface BRI0 > ip address 133.2.9.1 255.255.255.252 > no ip directed-broadcast > encapsulation ppp > no keepalive > dialer string 7133169436 > dialer-group 1 > isdn switch-type basic-ni > isdn spid1 71331694370101 > > dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit > > This is sooo much cheaper than a simulator and sofar I have been able to do > everthing i have been wanting to practice. I dont suppose you could do > multilink but who cares! Thank you everybody this is a great group. _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19873&t=19860 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: filtering ospf [7:19856]
Let me rethink that one change the interface type with the ospf interface command to non-broadcast and use a neighbor statement to select the router on the multi-access segment you would like to form and adjacency with. -Original Message- From: Jim Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 3:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: filtering ospf [7:19856] How about a passive interface with a neighbor statement. Changes the behavior from multicast to unicast, thereby eliminating traffic to the rouge router. -Original Message- From: Patrick Ramsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 3:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: filtering ospf [7:19856] Anyone remember how to ACL ospf? basically I have area 0 on one interface of a router that touches another company's area 0 (we're splitting) And I want to stop sending them updates and stop receiving updates from them. The real kicker is that I still have another router on that side in area 0 that WAS vendor supported and I can not make any changes to it. (therefor area 0 must remain for it to communicate properly) I seem to recall reading about filters designed just for this scenario but I can not find them in conf t Anyone else know? -Patrick Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19871&t=19856 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TRIBUTE TO THE UNITED STATES [7:19872]
A TRIBUTE TO THE UNITED STATES This, from a Canadian newspaper, is worth sharing. America: The Good Neighbor. Widespread but only partial news coverage was given recently to a remarkable editorial broadcast from Toronto by Gordon Sinclair, a Canadian television commentator. What follows is the full text of his trenchant remarks as printed in the Congressional Record: "This Canadian thinks it is time to speak up for the Americans as the most generous and possibly the least appreciated people on all the earth. Germany, Japan and, to a lesser extent, Britain and Italy were lifted out of the debris of war by the Americans who poured in billions of dollars and forgave other billions in debts. None of these countries is today paying even the interest on its remaining debts to the United States. When France was in danger of collapsing in 1956, it was the Americans who propped it up, and their reward was to be insulted and swindled on the streets of Paris. I was there. I saw it. When earthquakes hit distant cities, it is the United States that hurries in to help. This spring, 59 American communities were flattened by tornadoes. Nobody helped. The Marshall Plan and the Truman Policy pumped billions of dollars! into discouraged countries. Now newspapers in those countries are writing about the decadent, warmongering Americans. I'd like to see just one of those countries that is gloating over the erosion of the United States dollar build its own airplane. Does any other country in the world have a plane to equal the Boeing Jumbo Jet, the Lockheed Tri-Star, or the Douglas DC10? If so, why don't they fly them? Why do all the International lines except Russia fly American Planes? Why does no other land on earth even consider putting a man or woman on the moon? You talk about Japanese technocracy, and you get radios. You talk about German technocracy, and you get automobiles. You talk about American technocracy, and you find men on the moon -! not once, but several times - and safely home again. You talk about scandals, and the Americans put theirs right in the store window for everybody to look at. Even their draft-dodgers are not pursued and hounded. They are here on our streets, and most of them, unless they are breaking Canadian laws, are getting American dollars from ma and pa at home to spend here. When the railways of France, Germany and India were breaking down through age, it was the Americans who rebuilt them. When the Pennsylvania Railroad and the New York Central went broke, nobody loaned them an old caboose. Both are still broke. I can name you 5000 times when the Americans raced to the help of other people in trouble. Can you name me even one time when someone else raced to the Americans in trouble? I don't think there was outside help even during the San Francisco earthquake. Our neighbors have faced it alone, and I'm one Canadian who is damned tired of hearing them get kicked around. They will come out of this thing with their flag high. And when they do, they are entitled to thumb their nose at the lands that are gloating over their present troubles. I hope Canada is not one of those." Stand proud, America! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19872&t=19872 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: filtering ospf [7:19856]
Hi Patrick, I may need you to elaborate on your question a bit, because I am a little unclear on your desired OSPF outcome here, but Besides the obvious passive interface -- which does allow the interface address to be advertised via OSPF, but will not allow the router to form an adjacency with other routers -- you could put an extended access list on the interface that says something like... access-list 101 deny ip host host 224.0.0.5 For example: access-list 101 deny ip host 10.10.10.1 host 224.0.0.5 access-list 101 permit ip any any ! interface ethernet0 ip access-group 101 in this would prevent your router from forming an adjacency with the router that has the ip of 10.10.10.1, but any other would be permited. hth, Dave Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19870&t=19856 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Redistributing IGP's to BGP NOT working!! [7:19706]
No, if no synch is needed it would be on the two IBGP peers so that they will inject EBGP routes into their BGP routing table without having an equvilent IGP route entry. If your seeing all the routes in your routing tables it doesn't sound like a synch issue but synchronization is unrealistic today since it expects the redistribution of BGP routes into your IGP. Dave Cisco Nuts wrote: > > Oh!! So RTC and RTB needs to have #no synchI'll try that .Yes, > RTA is running EBGP with RTC and IBGP with RTB.RTA just does not know > how to redistribute RTB's netw to RTC and vice-versa.Even though a > #sh ip route and a #sh ip bgp shows all 3 networks on all 3 > routers...Just cannot ping RTB from RTC and vice-versa.. > > >From: "suaveguru" >Reply-To: "suaveguru" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: RE: Redistributing IGP's to BGP NOT working!! [7:19706] >Date: > Thu, 13 Sep 2001 05:04:06 -0400 > >I think running IBGP follow by EBGP > will solve the >problems of thinking how to restribute IGP routes > > > >regards, > >suaveguru >--- Farhan Ahmed wrote: > > rta should have two > interface one running ibgp and > > one ebgp > > rtb and rtc should be bgp > peers with sync off > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Brian > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 7:35 AM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Redistributing IGP's to BGP > NOT > > working!! [7:19706] > > > > > > igp and bgp networks identical > with same mask? > > > > What about sync > > > > Bri > > > > - > Original Message - > > From: "Cisco Nuts" > > To: > > Sent: > Wednesday, September 12, 2001 7:11 PM > > Subject: Redistributing IGP's > to BGP NOT working!! > > [7:19706] > > > > > > > Hello, > > > I have > configured 3 routers with BGP.RTA and > > RTB are in AS100...RTC on > > > > AS300 > > > RTA has netw. 150.10.0.0 configed on Loopback0 > > > RTB > netw. 160.10.0.0 and RTC netw. 170.10.0.0 > > likewise > > > RTC > connected to RTA and RTA connected to RTB > > > Have the networks > advertised on each router > > > Have the redistribute connected configed > on RTA > > > Also have RIP running b/w RTA and RTB with > > networks > 150.10.0.0 and > > > 160.10.0.0 configed. Have the redistribute rip > > > command on RTA > > > Problem is: > > > Cannot ping 160.10.0.1 from RTC > and > > > Cannot ping 160.10.0.1 from RTA > > > Cannot ping 170.10.0.1 > from RTB > > > > > > I took out rip and configured static routes on RTA > > > and RTB and the > > > redistribute static command on RTA...Still same > > > problem. > > > > > > Question is: What is the trick to redistribute > > > IGP or static routes to > > BGP > > > so that RTC can get those > networks?? Please > > advise. > > > > > > Thank you. > > > Kind regards. > > > > > > > > > > >_ > > > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at > > > http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >__ >Terrorist Attacks on > U.S. - How can you help? >Donate cash, emergency relief information > >http://dailynews.yahoo.com/fc/US/Emergency_Information/ > > > > >Message > Posted at: >http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19735&t=19706 > >-- >FAQ, list archives, > and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report > misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19867&t=19706 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Alteon Switch manual [7:19861]
I have no familiarity with this product, but googling is good.. http://www.allasso.es/base/docs/1979494715.pdf Brian "Sonic" Whalen Success = Preparation + Opportunity On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Ali Mesdaq wrote: > Hello, > Does anyone have the manual in pdf format of the Alteon switch model AD2. If > anyone knows of a site please let me know. > Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19868&t=19861 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: filtering ospf [7:19856]
224.0.0.5 and 224.0.0.6, in fact I just did this to stop OSPF from becoming an interesting packet and firing up an ISDN backup link!! Dave Patrick Ramsey wrote: > > Anyone remember how to ACL ospf? > > basically I have area 0 on one interface of a router that touches another > company's area 0 (we're splitting) And I want to stop sending them updates > and stop receiving updates from them. > > The real kicker is that I still have another router on that side in area 0 > that WAS vendor supported and I can not make any changes to it. (therefor > area 0 must remain for it to communicate properly) > > I seem to recall reading about filters designed just for this scenario but I > can not find them in conf t Anyone else know? > > -Patrick -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19869&t=19856 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SNMP index numbering [7:19866]
One question: how are devices refigured when virtual devices are added? I.e. I have interfaces 1, 2, 3 in the ifIndex, and I create subinterface 1.1. What will that device be listed as in ifIndex? 4? Sean Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19866&t=19866 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco VPN Client [7:19858]
sounds like a split tunnel issue. I believe split tunneling is turned off by default. if this is the case, here is the explanation: the model for VPN is a user station connecting to a corporate network through the internet. There is an issue with having an open internet net connection on a remote user machine while connected via a VPN to the Corp net. the user machine can be compromised by an internet hacker, who then has access to corporate through the user connection. split tunnel is the term for this situation - having an open connection to the local internet at the same time one has a secure connection via a VPN tunnel. Because this is considered a real security risk, most VPN client software turns this feature off by default. you should be able to find the required settings in the config guide, so you can permit split tunneling. although I gotta say, if I understand you correctly, you would be opening up your server to compromise from the internet. why not do the VPN tunnel through an edge device, like a router? Site to site VPN? HTH Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of George Kallingal Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 2:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco VPN Client [7:19858] I have a question about the Cisco VPN Client software and how it binds its driver to a network card. We have an NT server that we are connecting to a remote network using the Cisco VPN Client (to a Concentrator 3000, I believe). Upon connection through the VPN, I lose connectivity to the other servers on the local network. Is there a way to maintain the local area connection while connected over VPN? I tried to multi-home the server and unbind the DNE driver for one network card, but that just disabled the network card. Has anyone experienced this before? Are there any workarounds? Fixes? Or does this require a call to Cisco TAC? Thanks. George Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19865&t=19858 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Dual FIFO? [7:19691]
Voice is in a different queue than data, so there are two queues (hence the dual)?? At 03:09 PM 9/13/01, John Neiberger wrote: >I understand that concept but I haven't been able to connect that to the >dual FIFO queue. How does fragmentation relate to the dual queue? If I >follow Cisco's suggestion and use a fragmentation size of 1600 then no >fragmentation is actually occurring, yet the dual FIFO queue is >implemented. > >I have this nagging feeling that I'm just missing something that I >should have figured out by now. Or maybe the documentation writer was just missing something?? ;-) Priscilla >Thanks, >John > > >>> "MADMAN" 9/13/01 9:01:55 AM >>> >The bottom line is you fragment data packets, never voice, so that a >voice packets, which are small, never get queued behind a 1500 byte >packet. The rule of thumb I think is you don't want more than 150ms >delay in any voice packets or you may as well dump it. > > dave > >Stephen Skinner wrote: > > > > the only thing i could find was this > > > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/788/voice-qos/voip-ov-fr-qos.pdf > > > > which says > > > > "Turn on fragmentation for low speed links (less than 1.5Mbps). > > Set the fragment size so voice packets are not fragmented and do not > > experience a serialization delay greater than 20 ms. > > > > Lowest Link Speed in Path Recommended Fragmentation Size > > > > 56Kbps 70 bytes > > 64Kbps 80 bytes > > 128Kbps 160 bytes > > 256Kbps 320 bytes > > 512Kbps 640 bytes > > 768Kbps 1000 bytes > > 1536Kbps 1600 bytes > > > > Note: For 1536 Kbps, no fragmentation is technically needed, but > > fragmentation is needed to enable the dual first-in, first-out > > (FIFO) queueing system to ensure voice quality. A fragment size of >1600 > > bytes enables the dual FIFO, but since 1600 bytes is > > higher than the typical serial interface maximum transmission unit >(MTU), > > large data packets are not fragmented. > > > > from what it says it`s just multple "stack" queue > > > > sorry i can`t be of more help.. > > > > Cheers > > > > steve > > >From: "John Neiberger" > > >Reply-To: "John Neiberger" > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >Subject: Dual FIFO? [7:19691] > > >Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 18:34:53 -0400 > > > > > >When configuring VoIP on T-1 links, I see that CCO suggests turning >on > > >frame relay fragmentation with a fragment size of 1600 simply to >turn on > > >the dual fifo queue. What is that? I'm familiar with the single >fifo > > >but what is dual fifo and how does it work? > > > > > >I've searched CCO and all I can find is how to turn it on. I have >yet > > >to find any sort of explanation. > > > > > >thanks! > > > > > >John > > _ > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at >http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp >-- >David Madland >Sr. Network Engineer >CCIE# 2016 >Qwest Communications Int. Inc. >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >612-664-3367 > >"Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19864&t=19691 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The hub from hell... [7:19818]
To answer your questions: Yes, that's a fair representation. I figured out that it was the hub because a hub more or less in this picture works as a crossed cat5 cable, especially if you only have two devices connected to it, which I tried before I replaced it with a switch. Since the switch worked and a crossed cat5 worked, but the hub didn't work - I was very sure that it was the problem. I did all the show ... cmd's and tried to clear the arp cache without any change. Thanks, Ole ~~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~~~ NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job ~~~ -Original Message- From: EA Louie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 4:09 PM To: Ole Drews Jensen; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: The hub from hell... [7:19818] I'm assuming that this is a fair representation of the network? PC --10/100BT-- HUB --10/100BT--- 1720 --- F/R --- 2620 --- CORP-LAN Ethernet why and how did you isolate the problem being the hub? It doesn't sound like you had a Sniffer out there. Did you run any debugs on the 1720 to see what it was seing? Any 'show int fast0/0' on the 1720? A 'show arp' on the 1720? Does that model 3Com hub do 'micro-segmentation'? And Ethernet hubs do not have feelings. However, if they did, they would be feelin' groovy. - Original Message - From: "Ole Drews Jensen" To: Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 11:30 AM Subject: The hub from hell... [7:19818] > This might be slightly off topic, but I would like to get an answer if > someone has one. > > Task: > > To change a remote office from an ISDN connection to a Frame Relay > connection. > > Before: > > Workstations and printers were connected to a 3COM hub that was connected to > a 700 series ISDN router that was directly connected to another 700 series > router which was connected to our LAN. > > Everything was working fine, but slow. > > Goal: > > Workstations and printers connect to a 3COM hub that connects to a 1720 > router that has a Frame Relay PVC to a 2620 router that connects to our LAN. > > Steps: > > I connected the 1720 router to the smartjack and connected it to one > workstation with a crossed cable to from the FastEthernet interface. > > I telnettet into the router and got everything up. I could see the active > PVC and all was well. > > I rebooted the PC and got an IP address (plus more) from the DHCP server at > the main office, and logged on to the network without any problems. > > The problem began after I got the workstations and printers shut down, > unplugged the 700 series router from the hub, and connected the 1720 > instead. > > I could not login to the network anymore, and I could not ping, tracert or > telnet into anything on the LAN. However, I could telnet to the 1720 router, > and from there ping, tracert and telnet to the rest of the LAN. > > This was weird, because I knew that the hub worked when connected to the > ISDN router, and I knew that the 1720 router could see the LAN, and I also > knew that it worked with a crossed cable instead of the hub. > > I finally got a hold of a LinkSys switch which I connected instead of the > hub, and now everything worked fine. > > ? > > Now, what could cause a hub to allow all communication through a port > connected to an ISDN router but not a 1720 router, when they both work with > a crossed cable and a switch? > > I did by the way also clear the arp cache on all my devices on the network, > even though the problem didn't really point in that direction. > > Anyone has a clue what's going on, or is it something personal that the hub > hates the 1720? > > Thanks, > > Ole > > ~~~ > Ole Drews Jensen > Systems Network Manager > CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I > RWR Enterprises, Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ~~~ > http://www.RouterChief.com > ~~~ > NEED A JOB ??? > http://www.oledrews.com/job > ~~~ _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19863&t=19818 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: filtering ospf [7:19856]
use an access list that filters on ip protocol number 89 access-list 101 deny ospf source destination access-list 101 permit etc but based on what you say about a router of yours on "their" side? maybe "they" should take responsibility for the filtering on the appropriate interfaces? Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Patrick Ramsey Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 2:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: filtering ospf [7:19856] Anyone remember how to ACL ospf? basically I have area 0 on one interface of a router that touches another company's area 0 (we're splitting) And I want to stop sending them updates and stop receiving updates from them. The real kicker is that I still have another router on that side in area 0 that WAS vendor supported and I can not make any changes to it. (therefor area 0 must remain for it to communicate properly) I seem to recall reading about filters designed just for this scenario but I can not find them in conf t Anyone else know? -Patrick Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19862&t=19856 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alteon Switch manual [7:19861]
Hello, Does anyone have the manual in pdf format of the Alteon switch model AD2. If anyone knows of a site please let me know. Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19861&t=19861 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Back to Back ISDN Solution [7:19860]
Thanks for all who responded. Combining everyones posts I was able to put together a config that now works. For the record: You can indeed use a single ISDN line to connect two routers together to practice your ISDN configs. This config was tested using two C2503 routers, a single motorola NT1 w/2 ST ports and a single U port. The line was a standard ISDN line from SWBell. r3 interface BRI0 ip address 133.2.9.2 255.255.255.252 no ip directed-broadcast encapsulation ppp no keepalive dialer string 7133169437 dialer-group 1 isdn switch-type basic-ni isdn spid1 71331694360101 r5 interface BRI0 ip address 133.2.9.1 255.255.255.252 no ip directed-broadcast encapsulation ppp no keepalive dialer string 7133169436 dialer-group 1 isdn switch-type basic-ni isdn spid1 71331694370101 dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit This is sooo much cheaper than a simulator and sofar I have been able to do everthing i have been wanting to practice. I dont suppose you could do multilink but who cares! Thank you everybody this is a great group. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19860&t=19860 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: filtering ospf [7:19856]
How about a passive interface with a neighbor statement. Changes the behavior from multicast to unicast, thereby eliminating traffic to the rouge router. -Original Message- From: Patrick Ramsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 3:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: filtering ospf [7:19856] Anyone remember how to ACL ospf? basically I have area 0 on one interface of a router that touches another company's area 0 (we're splitting) And I want to stop sending them updates and stop receiving updates from them. The real kicker is that I still have another router on that side in area 0 that WAS vendor supported and I can not make any changes to it. (therefor area 0 must remain for it to communicate properly) I seem to recall reading about filters designed just for this scenario but I can not find them in conf t Anyone else know? -Patrick Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19859&t=19856 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco VPN Client [7:19858]
I have a question about the Cisco VPN Client software and how it binds its driver to a network card. We have an NT server that we are connecting to a remote network using the Cisco VPN Client (to a Concentrator 3000, I believe). Upon connection through the VPN, I lose connectivity to the other servers on the local network. Is there a way to maintain the local area connection while connected over VPN? I tried to multi-home the server and unbind the DNE driver for one network card, but that just disabled the network card. Has anyone experienced this before? Are there any workarounds? Fixes? Or does this require a call to Cisco TAC? Thanks. George Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19858&t=19858 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: The hub from hell... [7:19818]
I'm assuming that this is a fair representation of the network? PC --10/100BT-- HUB --10/100BT--- 1720 --- F/R --- 2620 --- CORP-LAN Ethernet why and how did you isolate the problem being the hub? It doesn't sound like you had a Sniffer out there. Did you run any debugs on the 1720 to see what it was seing? Any 'show int fast0/0' on the 1720? A 'show arp' on the 1720? Does that model 3Com hub do 'micro-segmentation'? And Ethernet hubs do not have feelings. However, if they did, they would be feelin' groovy. - Original Message - From: "Ole Drews Jensen" To: Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 11:30 AM Subject: The hub from hell... [7:19818] > This might be slightly off topic, but I would like to get an answer if > someone has one. > > Task: > > To change a remote office from an ISDN connection to a Frame Relay > connection. > > Before: > > Workstations and printers were connected to a 3COM hub that was connected to > a 700 series ISDN router that was directly connected to another 700 series > router which was connected to our LAN. > > Everything was working fine, but slow. > > Goal: > > Workstations and printers connect to a 3COM hub that connects to a 1720 > router that has a Frame Relay PVC to a 2620 router that connects to our LAN. > > Steps: > > I connected the 1720 router to the smartjack and connected it to one > workstation with a crossed cable to from the FastEthernet interface. > > I telnettet into the router and got everything up. I could see the active > PVC and all was well. > > I rebooted the PC and got an IP address (plus more) from the DHCP server at > the main office, and logged on to the network without any problems. > > The problem began after I got the workstations and printers shut down, > unplugged the 700 series router from the hub, and connected the 1720 > instead. > > I could not login to the network anymore, and I could not ping, tracert or > telnet into anything on the LAN. However, I could telnet to the 1720 router, > and from there ping, tracert and telnet to the rest of the LAN. > > This was weird, because I knew that the hub worked when connected to the > ISDN router, and I knew that the 1720 router could see the LAN, and I also > knew that it worked with a crossed cable instead of the hub. > > I finally got a hold of a LinkSys switch which I connected instead of the > hub, and now everything worked fine. > > ? > > Now, what could cause a hub to allow all communication through a port > connected to an ISDN router but not a 1720 router, when they both work with > a crossed cable and a switch? > > I did by the way also clear the arp cache on all my devices on the network, > even though the problem didn't really point in that direction. > > Anyone has a clue what's going on, or is it something personal that the hub > hates the 1720? > > Thanks, > > Ole > > ~~~ > Ole Drews Jensen > Systems Network Manager > CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I > RWR Enterprises, Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ~~~ > http://www.RouterChief.com > ~~~ > NEED A JOB ??? > http://www.oledrews.com/job > ~~~ _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19857&t=19818 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
filtering ospf [7:19856]
Anyone remember how to ACL ospf? basically I have area 0 on one interface of a router that touches another company's area 0 (we're splitting) And I want to stop sending them updates and stop receiving updates from them. The real kicker is that I still have another router on that side in area 0 that WAS vendor supported and I can not make any changes to it. (therefor area 0 must remain for it to communicate properly) I seem to recall reading about filters designed just for this scenario but I can not find them in conf t Anyone else know? -Patrick Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19856&t=19856 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The hub from hell... [7:19818]
No default route to any of them - both were/are setup with bridging to provide the branch office the same network. Ole ~~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~~~ NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job ~~~ -Original Message- From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 3:44 PM To: Ole Drews Jensen Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: The hub from hell... [7:19818] Is the default route of the workstations still the 770's address instead of the 1720's? Dave Ole Drews Jensen wrote: > > This might be slightly off topic, but I would like to get an answer if > someone has one. > > Task: > > To change a remote office from an ISDN connection to a Frame Relay > connection. > > Before: > > Workstations and printers were connected to a 3COM hub that was connected to > a 700 series ISDN router that was directly connected to another 700 series > router which was connected to our LAN. > > Everything was working fine, but slow. > > Goal: > > Workstations and printers connect to a 3COM hub that connects to a 1720 > router that has a Frame Relay PVC to a 2620 router that connects to our LAN. > > Steps: > > I connected the 1720 router to the smartjack and connected it to one > workstation with a crossed cable to from the FastEthernet interface. > > I telnettet into the router and got everything up. I could see the active > PVC and all was well. > > I rebooted the PC and got an IP address (plus more) from the DHCP server at > the main office, and logged on to the network without any problems. > > The problem began after I got the workstations and printers shut down, > unplugged the 700 series router from the hub, and connected the 1720 > instead. > > I could not login to the network anymore, and I could not ping, tracert or > telnet into anything on the LAN. However, I could telnet to the 1720 router, > and from there ping, tracert and telnet to the rest of the LAN. > > This was weird, because I knew that the hub worked when connected to the > ISDN router, and I knew that the 1720 router could see the LAN, and I also > knew that it worked with a crossed cable instead of the hub. > > I finally got a hold of a LinkSys switch which I connected instead of the > hub, and now everything worked fine. > > ? > > Now, what could cause a hub to allow all communication through a port > connected to an ISDN router but not a 1720 router, when they both work with > a crossed cable and a switch? > > I did by the way also clear the arp cache on all my devices on the network, > even though the problem didn't really point in that direction. > > Anyone has a clue what's going on, or is it something personal that the hub > hates the 1720? > > Thanks, > > Ole > > ~~~ > Ole Drews Jensen > Systems Network Manager > CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I > RWR Enterprises, Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ~~~ > http://www.RouterChief.com > ~~~ > NEED A JOB ??? > http://www.oledrews.com/job > ~~~ -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19855&t=19818 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: A plan to rebuild.... [7:19611]
Hey Team lets take it easy. Canada has it's problems just like we do.
We're only human. I'm just happy that we have neighbors like them on our
side. I personally consider them a BIG Suburb of the USA.
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Mole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 8:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: A plan to rebuild [7:19611]
Take a freakin hike Dipshit. What? they wouldn't have found another way in?
- Original Message -
From: "Leigh Anne Chisholm"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 11:14 PM
Subject: RE: A plan to rebuild [7:19611]
> I guess you're not aware of Canada's reputation as being a haven for
> murderers and terrorists. Once these people are here, we can't deport
them
> because of goofy Canadian politics. When these people come into Canada,
> Canada has a responsibility to ensure these people don't have undesirable
> backgrounds. Then when they're here, it's easy for them to get forged
> documents indicating that they are Canadian citizens. That makes the US
> immigration department's job more difficult because of the free flowing
> policy of letting Canadians pass through the US border with a minimum of
> background checking. It's the freedom that Canada enjoys with the US
that's
> at risk unless our Government steps up to the plate and tightens things
up.
> How often have you heard after the fact that Canada Immigration didn't
> investigate into people's backgrounds properly? Far too often I'm afraid.
>
> It wasn't the Canadian immigration department that stopped the guy heading
> into the US to blow up LAX on the millenium... it was the US immigration
> department.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > Torren Craigie-Manson
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 8:22 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: A plan to rebuild [7:19611]
> >
> >
> > > > --- Leigh Anne Chisholm wrote:
> > {snip}
> > > > > I would really hope that of all the things that come out of this,
if
> > it's
> > > > > found that the terrorists came through Canada, the US
> > whacks Canadian
> > > > > politicians upside the head for their lax immigration policies and
> > > > > incompetent information service (Canada's version of the FBI).
They
> > should
> > > > > have been tracking those terrorists the second they entered
Canada.
> > > > >
> > > > > **I** am not impressed...
> > > > >
> >
> > Leigh Anne,
> >
> > Perhaps you can explain to me why you feel that Canadian
> > authorities should
> > have spotted these terrorists, but you make no mention of the
> > failure of US
> > authorities to spot them. Your statement is illogical and insulting to
the
> > integrity of Canada.
> >
> > This is an emotionally charged situation for people around the
> > world. Please
> > take a minute to stop and think before you appoint yourself judge
> > and jury,
> > and begin pointing fingers at _anyone_.
> >
> > Torren
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19854&t=19611
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: The hub from hell... [7:19818]
Is the default route of the workstations still the 770's address instead of the 1720's? Dave Ole Drews Jensen wrote: > > This might be slightly off topic, but I would like to get an answer if > someone has one. > > Task: > > To change a remote office from an ISDN connection to a Frame Relay > connection. > > Before: > > Workstations and printers were connected to a 3COM hub that was connected to > a 700 series ISDN router that was directly connected to another 700 series > router which was connected to our LAN. > > Everything was working fine, but slow. > > Goal: > > Workstations and printers connect to a 3COM hub that connects to a 1720 > router that has a Frame Relay PVC to a 2620 router that connects to our LAN. > > Steps: > > I connected the 1720 router to the smartjack and connected it to one > workstation with a crossed cable to from the FastEthernet interface. > > I telnettet into the router and got everything up. I could see the active > PVC and all was well. > > I rebooted the PC and got an IP address (plus more) from the DHCP server at > the main office, and logged on to the network without any problems. > > The problem began after I got the workstations and printers shut down, > unplugged the 700 series router from the hub, and connected the 1720 > instead. > > I could not login to the network anymore, and I could not ping, tracert or > telnet into anything on the LAN. However, I could telnet to the 1720 router, > and from there ping, tracert and telnet to the rest of the LAN. > > This was weird, because I knew that the hub worked when connected to the > ISDN router, and I knew that the 1720 router could see the LAN, and I also > knew that it worked with a crossed cable instead of the hub. > > I finally got a hold of a LinkSys switch which I connected instead of the > hub, and now everything worked fine. > > ? > > Now, what could cause a hub to allow all communication through a port > connected to an ISDN router but not a 1720 router, when they both work with > a crossed cable and a switch? > > I did by the way also clear the arp cache on all my devices on the network, > even though the problem didn't really point in that direction. > > Anyone has a clue what's going on, or is it something personal that the hub > hates the 1720? > > Thanks, > > Ole > > ~~~ > Ole Drews Jensen > Systems Network Manager > CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I > RWR Enterprises, Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ~~~ > http://www.RouterChief.com > ~~~ > NEED A JOB ??? > http://www.oledrews.com/job > ~~~ -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19853&t=19818 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Off subject...but [7:19843]
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote: > > Can't believe all the "Nostradamus" crap that my company is getting, > someone yesterday posted a link to the centuries site. I deleted this post > (stupid me) could you re-post for me??? > > Thanks Ron -- Natasha Flazynski CCNA, MCSE http://www.ciscobot.com My Cisco information site. http://www.botbuilders.com Artificial Intelligence and Linux development Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19851&t=19843 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Certified Network Instructor [7:19659]
Actually, you can become a CCAI at the Local Academy level as long as you received your training (all four semesters) from a Regional (or higher) Academy, passed the CCNA exam, and taught at least one semester of the CCNA program. HTH, Prof. Tom Lisa, CCAI Community College of Southern Nevada Cisco Regional Networking Academy SUranjith Ariyapperuma wrote: > CCAI is offered by a cisco regional academy (RA). You have to join an RA to > become a CCAI. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19850&t=19659 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: External power adaptor for IP Phone 79XX [7:19841]
I'm using a 7960 but there's no power adaptor hook up to it. I guess the LAN connection provides the power. Rick Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19848&t=19841 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IPsec over GRE tunnel to *nix box [7:19554]
It's possible. I have configured several vpn links using GRE on linux. You'll need to load the GRE module and put a simple rc file to initialize the tunnels The rc. file looks like this /sbin/insmod ip_gre /sbin/ip tunnel add tunnel0 mode gre local 200.xxx.xxx.xx remote 200... /sbin/ifconfig tunnel0 172.20.3.178 dstaddr 172.20.3.177 /sbin/route add -net 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 dev tunnel0 - Original Message - From: "Ed Horley" To: Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 4:56 PM Subject: Re: IPsec over GRE tunnel to *nix box [7:19554] > AcessoBOL, ss R$ 9,90! O menor prego do mercado! > Assine ja! http://www.bol.com.br/acessobol/ > > > > I am unsure from your posting if you are looking for an IPsec termination > for *nix or a GRE termination for *nix. For the IPsec you can use freeswan: > www.freeswan.org > I am not sure about implementation of terminating a GRE tunnel directly into > a *nix box. I am sure it has been done but I am not aware of any packages > that do that. > > Ed > ""Sam Deckert"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Hey everyone, > > > > First and foremost, I hope all people that have been affected by the > tragedy > > are coping ok - we here in Oz are thinking and praying for you. > > > > Also, I was just wondering if anyone has ever been able to terminate a GRE > > tunnel from a Cisco router to a *nix box of some flavor? I have been > > scouring > > the net, but havent found anything that can do this as yet. Is this even > > possible? > > > > Thanks for any help/ideas you can provide, and regards > > > > Sam. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19846&t=19554 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Redistributing IGP's to BGP NOT working!! [7:19706]
Oh!! So RTC and RTB needs to have #no synchI'll try that .Yes, RTA is running EBGP with RTC and IBGP with RTB.RTA just does not know how to redistribute RTB's netw to RTC and vice-versa.Even though a #sh ip route and a #sh ip bgp shows all 3 networks on all 3 routers...Just cannot ping RTB from RTC and vice-versa.. >From: "suaveguru" >Reply-To: "suaveguru" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: Redistributing IGP's to BGP NOT working!! [7:19706] >Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 05:04:06 -0400 > >I think running IBGP follow by EBGP will solve the >problems of thinking how to restribute IGP routes > > >regards, > >suaveguru >--- Farhan Ahmed wrote: > > rta should have two interface one running ibgp and > > one ebgp > > rtb and rtc should be bgp peers with sync off > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 7:35 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Redistributing IGP's to BGP NOT > > working!! [7:19706] > > > > > > igp and bgp networks identical with same mask? > > > > What about sync > > > > Bri > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Cisco Nuts" > > To: > > Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 7:11 PM > > Subject: Redistributing IGP's to BGP NOT working!! > > [7:19706] > > > > > > > Hello, > > > I have configured 3 routers with BGP.RTA and > > RTB are in AS100...RTC on > > > AS300 > > > RTA has netw. 150.10.0.0 configed on Loopback0 > > > RTB netw. 160.10.0.0 and RTC netw. 170.10.0.0 > > likewise > > > RTC connected to RTA and RTA connected to RTB > > > Have the networks advertised on each router > > > Have the redistribute connected configed on RTA > > > Also have RIP running b/w RTA and RTB with > > networks 150.10.0.0 and > > > 160.10.0.0 configed. Have the redistribute rip > > command on RTA > > > Problem is: > > > Cannot ping 160.10.0.1 from RTC and > > > Cannot ping 160.10.0.1 from RTA > > > Cannot ping 170.10.0.1 from RTB > > > > > > I took out rip and configured static routes on RTA > > and RTB and the > > > redistribute static command on RTA...Still same > > problem. > > > > > > Question is: What is the trick to redistribute > > IGP or static routes to > > BGP > > > so that RTC can get those networks?? Please > > advise. > > > > > > Thank you. > > > Kind regards. > > > > > > > > >_ > > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at > > http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >__ >Terrorist Attacks on U.S. - How can you help? >Donate cash, emergency relief information >http://dailynews.yahoo.com/fc/US/Emergency_Information/ > > > > >Message Posted at: >http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19735&t=19706 >-- >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19849&t=19706 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Redistributing IGP's to BGP NOT working!! [7:19706]
a #sh ip route and a #sh ip bgp shows all 3 routes...Just cannot ping from RTC to RTB and vice-versa.. >From: "Peter Van Oene" >To: "Cisco Nuts" , [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Redistributing IGP's to BGP NOT working!! [7:19706] >Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 08:50:39 -0400 > >What are your BGP neighbor relationships showing? What do you see when you issue a show ip bgp? or a show ip bgp sum? > > >*** REPLY SEPARATOR *** > >On 9/12/2001 at 10:11 PM Cisco Nuts wrote: > > >Hello, > >I have configured 3 routers with BGP.RTA and RTB are in AS100...RTC on > >AS300 > >RTA has netw. 150.10.0.0 configed on Loopback0 > >RTB netw. 160.10.0.0 and RTC netw. 170.10.0.0 likewise > >RTC connected to RTA and RTA connected to RTB > >Have the networks advertised on each router > >Have the redistribute connected configed on RTA > >Also have RIP running b/w RTA and RTB with networks 150.10.0.0 and > >160.10.0.0 configed. Have the redistribute rip command on RTA > >Problem is: > >Cannot ping 160.10.0.1 from RTC and > >Cannot ping 160.10.0.1 from RTA > >Cannot ping 170.10.0.1 from RTB > > > >I took out rip and configured static routes on RTA and RTB and the > >redistribute static command on RTA...Still same problem. > > > >Question is: What is the trick to redistribute IGP or static routes to > >BGP > >so that RTC can get those networks?? Please advise. > > > >Thank you. > >Kind regards. > > > >_ > >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp > archives, and subscription info: > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19847&t=19706 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 'It's not the US they want to destroy. It's our arrogance' [7:19845]
I really had not intended to post anymore on non-Cisco topics on the list today since I feel I did enough of that yesterday, but I feel this cannot go without a response. Please people, try to contain and direct your anger to the individuals involved in this act. While they may have been of Muslim faith (albeit an extreme sect) PLEASE remember that not all Muslims share the views of a few radicals. I would hate to see hate-crimes against a religious group because of this. Lets take it back to Cisco now. Heather > -Original Message- > From: hal9001 [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 1:49 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: 'It's not the US they want to destroy. It's our > arrogance' [7:19819] > > Don't you mean the CULT of ALLAH..any so called religion that > encourages > this mayhem is a one way ticket to hell. Its nothing more than an evil > cult! > > Karl > - Original Message - > From: "John Mairs" > To: > Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 6:20 AM > Subject: RE: 'It's not the US they want to destroy. It's our arrogance' > [7:19726] > > > > aaammen! > > > > Allah be paved! > > > > > > --- ed smith wrote: > > > Respectfully I would say,,, let people blow some > > > steam off! Who the hell > > > cares about CISCO right now? > > > > > > Ed > > > > > > >From: "Thad Gaston" >To: "ed smith" , >Subject: RE: > > > 'It's not the US > > > they want to destroy. It's our arrogance' [7:19679] > > > >Date: Wed, 12 Sep > > > 2001 17:59:42 -0400 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Received: > > > from [12.109.97.147] by > > > hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id > > > MHotMailBD69252000344136E8170C6D619313EB0; Wed, 12 > > > Sep 2001 14:56:49 > > > -0700 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 12 Sep 2001 > > > 14:57:36 -0700 > > > >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange > > > V6.0.4417.0 >content-class: > > > urn:content-classes:message >Message-ID: > > > > > > >X-MS-Has-Attach: >X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: > > > >Thread-Topic: 'It's not the US > > > they want to destroy. It's our arrogance' [7:19679] > > > >Thread-Index: > > > AcE71YI1yqc/7joNR3ugD6ApyYlA6wAAC/Bg > >All, > >I > > > would discourage any > > > further post regarding this topic as it becoming > > > >more and more useless > > > and distracting. None of our sentiments are going > > > >to bring back the > > > lives of those that have passed on nor bring about > > > the >justice the we > > > all would like to see. Let's keep the list on track > > > and >get back to what > > > this list is intended for. > >Regards, > >Thad > > > Gaston > >-Original > > > Message- >From: ed smith > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: > > > Wednesday, September 12, 2001 5:36 PM >To: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: > > > Re: 'It's not the US they want to destroy. It's our > > > arrogance' >[7:19679] > > > > > >That is the biggest load of crap I've ever > > > heard! >The people we > > > see dancing in the streets of Palestine are > > > brainwashed! > >The common > > > person in the middle east would give anything to > > > come and >live in >the > > > U.S. and get out of their hell hole they call home. > > > Believe me, I >did 2 > > > >years there, it sucks!!! Nothing worth keeping in > > > that part of the > > > >World. > >I don't see all those God forsaken > > > countries having a problem > > > with >people >wanting to immigrate there! > >If they > > > believe they are > > > God's chosen people, why didn't he make them >from > > > >Hawaii, or > > > Switzerland, or some other nice part of this World? > > > > >They don't have > > > the open airways or free flow of information to make > > > >logical >decisions. > > > They only believe what their ignorant and jealous > > > leaders >tell >them. > > > > >They wanted a "Holy War" I think they have it,, > > > > Holy @!#$ Ahkmed, > > > here comes a Tomahawk missile! > Holy @!#$ Al-@!#$, > > > here comes a flights > > > of F-15's!!! > Holy @!#$ Al-Khobar, I think I'm > > > going to see Allah! > > > > >Wait and see brings new meaning to "bombs > > > bursting in air". > >YOU > > > SEEM TWISTED, according to your last email anyway. > > > > > > > > > > > > >_ > > > >Get > > > your FREE download of MSN Explorer at > > > >http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp > > > > misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at > > > http://explorer.msn.com > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > = > > John L. Mairs > > > > __ > > Terrorist Attacks on U.S. - How can you help? > > Donate cash, emergency relief information > > http://dailynews.yahoo.com/fc/US/Emergency_Information/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19845&t=19845 -- FAQ, list archives,
RE: IPsec over GRE tunnel to *nix box [7:19554]
You might want to check out www.phrack.org/show.php?p=56&a=10. This article describes a tool called Tunnelx which can be used to decapsulate GRE on a *nix box. Although some might view this as a hacker tool, it might solve you problem. Michael Hall, CCIE #8112 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Horley Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 12:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: IPsec over GRE tunnel to *nix box [7:19554] I am unsure from your posting if you are looking for an IPsec termination for *nix or a GRE termination for *nix. For the IPsec you can use freeswan: www.freeswan.org I am not sure about implementation of terminating a GRE tunnel directly into a *nix box. I am sure it has been done but I am not aware of any packages that do that. Ed ""Sam Deckert"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hey everyone, > > First and foremost, I hope all people that have been affected by the tragedy > are coping ok - we here in Oz are thinking and praying for you. > > Also, I was just wondering if anyone has ever been able to terminate a GRE > tunnel from a Cisco router to a *nix box of some flavor? I have been > scouring > the net, but havent found anything that can do this as yet. Is this even > possible? > > Thanks for any help/ideas you can provide, and regards > > Sam. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19844&t=19554 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Off subject...but [7:19843]
Can't believe all the "Nostradamus" crap that my company is getting, someone yesterday posted a link to the centuries site. I deleted this post (stupid me) could you re-post for me??? Thanks Ron Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19843&t=19843 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: The hub from hell... [7:19818]
Yeah yeah...we all know it's those sentimental 16 color EGA & standard ASCII nudie pics on there that you collected in the 80's ;) Just kidding of course ;) - Original Message - From: "Ole Drews Jensen" To: "'Allen May'" ; "Ole Drews Jensen" ; Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 2:47 PM Subject: RE: The hub from hell... [7:19818] > Hey!!! - there's absolutely nothing wrong with my stack of 5.25 floppies - > they still have some of my Poly Pascal version 1.0 source code on them :-) > > Ole > > ~~~ > Ole Drews Jensen > Systems Network Manager > CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I > RWR Enterprises, Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ~~~ > http://www.RouterChief.com > ~~~ > NEED A JOB ??? > http://www.oledrews.com/job > ~~~ > > > -Original Message- > From: Allen May [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 2:46 PM > To: Ole Drews Jensen; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: The hub from hell... [7:19818] > > > The hub wants to die. It is time. Let it go. There is nothing you can do > to save it. Bid farewell and have it cremated in a burning pile of 5 1/4" > floppies. > > - Original Message - > From: "Ole Drews Jensen" > To: > Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 2:22 PM > Subject: RE: The hub from hell... [7:19818] > > > > Do you think it would help flushing the hub with saltwater ??? > > > > :-) > > > > Thanks, > > > > Ole > > > > ~~~ > > Ole Drews Jensen > > Systems Network Manager > > CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I > > RWR Enterprises, Inc. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ~~~ > > http://www.RouterChief.com > > ~~~ > > NEED A JOB ??? > > http://www.oledrews.com/job > > ~~~ > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Steve Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 2:00 PM > > To: Ole Drews Jensen; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: The hub from hell... [7:19818] > > > > > > Hey Ole, saw this exact same thing with a 3Com hub at a client. I took > > out there existing router, replaced it with a 1720, and bam, nothing. > > Set the Fast E0 to Half 10 some ports started working, swapped out the > > hub with a netgear hub, everything worked. Changed the FastE0 to 100 / > > half and all was fine. Put the 3Com in a few weeks later for grins and > > giggles, blam, work great. WEIRD! > > > > Steve > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Ole Drews Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 1:30 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: The hub from hell... [7:19818] > > > > > > This might be slightly off topic, but I would like to get an answer if > > someone has one. > > > > Task: > > > > To change a remote office from an ISDN connection to a Frame Relay > > connection. > > > > Before: > > > > Workstations and printers were connected to a 3COM hub that was > > connected to > > a 700 series ISDN router that was directly connected to another 700 > > series > > router which was connected to our LAN. > > > > Everything was working fine, but slow. > > > > Goal: > > > > Workstations and printers connect to a 3COM hub that connects to a 1720 > > router that has a Frame Relay PVC to a 2620 router that connects to our > > LAN. > > > > Steps: > > > > I connected the 1720 router to the smartjack and connected it to one > > workstation with a crossed cable to from the FastEthernet interface. > > > > I telnettet into the router and got everything up. I could see the > > active > > PVC and all was well. > > > > I rebooted the PC and got an IP address (plus more) from the DHCP server > > at > > the main office, and logged on to the network without any problems. > > > > The problem began after I got the workstations and printers shut down, > > unplugged the 700 series router from the hub, and connected the 1720 > > instead. > > > > I could not login to the network anymore, and I could not ping, tracert > > or > > telnet into anything on the LAN. However, I could telnet to the 1720 > > router, > > and from there ping, tracert and telnet to the rest of the LAN. > > > > This was weird, because I knew that the hub worked when connected to the > > ISDN router, and I knew that the 1720 router could see the LAN, and I > > also > > knew that it worked with a crossed cable instead of the hub. > > > > I finally got a hold of a LinkSys switch which I connected instead of > > the > > hub, and now everything worked fine. > > > > ? > > > > Now, what could cause a hub to allow all communication through a port > > connected to an ISDN router but not a 1720 router, when they both work > > with > > a crossed cable and a switch? > > > > I did by the way also clear the arp cache on all my devices on the > > network, > > even though the problem didn't really point in that direction. > > > > Anyone has
PPP password [7:19837]
I need to display the PPP password on my ISDN link. In the enable mode can I turn off some type of encryption to then display the encrypted password? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19837&t=19837 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The hub from hell... [7:19818]
Hey!!! - there's absolutely nothing wrong with my stack of 5.25 floppies - they still have some of my Poly Pascal version 1.0 source code on them :-) Ole ~~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~~~ NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job ~~~ -Original Message- From: Allen May [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 2:46 PM To: Ole Drews Jensen; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: The hub from hell... [7:19818] The hub wants to die. It is time. Let it go. There is nothing you can do to save it. Bid farewell and have it cremated in a burning pile of 5 1/4" floppies. - Original Message - From: "Ole Drews Jensen" To: Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 2:22 PM Subject: RE: The hub from hell... [7:19818] > Do you think it would help flushing the hub with saltwater ??? > > :-) > > Thanks, > > Ole > > ~~~ > Ole Drews Jensen > Systems Network Manager > CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I > RWR Enterprises, Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ~~~ > http://www.RouterChief.com > ~~~ > NEED A JOB ??? > http://www.oledrews.com/job > ~~~ > > > -Original Message- > From: Steve Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 2:00 PM > To: Ole Drews Jensen; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: The hub from hell... [7:19818] > > > Hey Ole, saw this exact same thing with a 3Com hub at a client. I took > out there existing router, replaced it with a 1720, and bam, nothing. > Set the Fast E0 to Half 10 some ports started working, swapped out the > hub with a netgear hub, everything worked. Changed the FastE0 to 100 / > half and all was fine. Put the 3Com in a few weeks later for grins and > giggles, blam, work great. WEIRD! > > Steve > > -Original Message- > From: Ole Drews Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 1:30 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: The hub from hell... [7:19818] > > > This might be slightly off topic, but I would like to get an answer if > someone has one. > > Task: > > To change a remote office from an ISDN connection to a Frame Relay > connection. > > Before: > > Workstations and printers were connected to a 3COM hub that was > connected to > a 700 series ISDN router that was directly connected to another 700 > series > router which was connected to our LAN. > > Everything was working fine, but slow. > > Goal: > > Workstations and printers connect to a 3COM hub that connects to a 1720 > router that has a Frame Relay PVC to a 2620 router that connects to our > LAN. > > Steps: > > I connected the 1720 router to the smartjack and connected it to one > workstation with a crossed cable to from the FastEthernet interface. > > I telnettet into the router and got everything up. I could see the > active > PVC and all was well. > > I rebooted the PC and got an IP address (plus more) from the DHCP server > at > the main office, and logged on to the network without any problems. > > The problem began after I got the workstations and printers shut down, > unplugged the 700 series router from the hub, and connected the 1720 > instead. > > I could not login to the network anymore, and I could not ping, tracert > or > telnet into anything on the LAN. However, I could telnet to the 1720 > router, > and from there ping, tracert and telnet to the rest of the LAN. > > This was weird, because I knew that the hub worked when connected to the > ISDN router, and I knew that the 1720 router could see the LAN, and I > also > knew that it worked with a crossed cable instead of the hub. > > I finally got a hold of a LinkSys switch which I connected instead of > the > hub, and now everything worked fine. > > ? > > Now, what could cause a hub to allow all communication through a port > connected to an ISDN router but not a 1720 router, when they both work > with > a crossed cable and a switch? > > I did by the way also clear the arp cache on all my devices on the > network, > even though the problem didn't really point in that direction. > > Anyone has a clue what's going on, or is it something personal that the > hub > hates the 1720? > > Thanks, > > Ole > > ~~~ > Ole Drews Jensen > Systems Network Manager > CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I > RWR Enterprises, Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ~~~ > http://www.RouterChief.com > ~~~ > NEED A JOB ??? > http://www.oledrews.com/job > ~~~ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19838&t=19818 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http:/
External power adaptor for IP Phone 79XX [7:19841]
Hi group, We have anger and sorrow for Tue tragedy but there are thousands of other forums to express in the full extent. Lets keep this forum stick to its original purpose. Have anybody used external power adaptor for IP phone/ Part no is CP-PWR-CUBE. I've 2 questions: - Does it include power cord ? or I have to order it separatly ? - Can the normal PC power cord fit the plug ? Keith Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19841&t=19841 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: A plan to rebuild.... [7:19611]
oh, well I did say I was an idiot...I am more of a smartass and my remarks are more smarmy than anything else... my understanding was (and remember...idiot here) that they drove here and that one or more of them was on an FBI watch listI think of Canada as the United States in terms of our characteristics (like layed back attitudes between each of us entering each others borders and anyone coming in to them) and our freedoms tend to come at the cost of leniancy and advantages are going to be taken. Those freedoms (decades of uncomplicated unfettered travel) are worth the odd incident. For every one a** hole that has made it through a million good souls have come with them and we are the better for it in terms of intellectual and social diversity (remember, Einstein was a German citizen and I am glad we didn't consider him a "filthy German Nazi" when we let him in. Granted this odd incident is huge and I don't mean to minimize the loss (I have personal losses here of my own), but I like those freedoms and If they change, terrorism has won. If the landscape of New York city's skyline changesthey have won. Trust me when I say that skyline will return and we are going to win and win big. In a way I am glad that they went as far as they did because now anyone that was on the fence about whether or not we should risk American lives (the historical cost of our freedoms) are way off that fence now and we can really do some damage to anyone and everyone that is even remotely related to terrorism. I want the damage we inflict to be unbelievably disproportionate so that when they (terrorists) consider these actions in the future our responses won't be as unbelievable (proprtionally speaking) as they have been in the past. I want Americans to remain Americans and the Canadians to be Canadians as we (I) have come to know them (again my point of view, but that is really the only point of view I tend to look at). My intentions are not to offend you and I have always enjoyed our exchanges historically (some time has past since our last) but as I have stated before, I deal with pain through humor and unfortunately my humor tends to relate more to smartass (but it works for me) --- Leigh Anne Chisholm wrote: > John: This is a bit lengthy - please read it > carefully. It is detailed so > that you'll understand my point. > > > > Perhaps you missed my point. People are coming into > Canada from > Afghanistan. When they arrive here, we are aware > that they are coming from > a high risk country. They claim refugee status. We > begin processing them > and then release them into the fabric of Canada. > From there, many refugees > disappear never to be heard from again. > > This is from Canada's Central Security Intelligence > Service > (http://www.csis-scrs.gc.ca/eng/backgrnd/back8_e.html): > > The vast majority of terrorist activities in Canada > relate to the support of > actions elsewhere that are linked to homeland > conflicts. These activities > include providing safe haven for terrorist > supporters and may involve using > the refugee stream to enter Canada, or immigrant > smuggling. In recent years, > terrorists from at least five different > international terrorist > organizations have come to Canada posing as > refugees. > > Here's an example of the problem I'm discussing in > action: > > WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Like thousands of other > international air travelers > whose passports are checked daily by U.S. officials, > Hani al-Sayegh > successfully passed through customs last August on > his way to Canada from > the Middle East. But al-Sayegh was not just another > traveler. He is > suspected of driving a lookout car for those who > bombed the Khobar Towers in > Saudi Arabia in June 1996, killing 19 U.S. > servicemen and injuring hundreds > of others. > > Once in Canada, they pose as Canadian citizens. > They show Canadian > passports at the US border to US customs and > immigrations officials. The US > representatives don't know that the country of > origin of these people is a > high risk - but rather believe them to be from a low > risk country. Not > quite two years ago a US American congressional > committee was due to begin > hearings in Washington to look at how Canada handles > security at its borders > however this committee hearing was postponed due to > heavy snow. "When they > begin Canada could be in for some heavy criticism > from the U.S." - CNN > > Canadian officials are investigating whether Ahmed > Ressam, who was arrested > at a U.S. border checkpoint last week with potential > bomb-making materials > hidden in his trunk, may be connected to an Algerian > theft and terror ring. > Ressam applied for refugee status in Canada but was > rejected because of > alleged links with the Armed Islamic Group, known as > the GIA, which is also > blamed for a series of massacres in Algeria. Ressam, > an Algerian national, > is said to have applied for Canadian citizenship > la
Re: PPP password [7:19837]
no service password-encryption ""Andy Barkl"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I need to display the PPP password on my ISDN link. > > In the enable mode can I turn off some type of encryption to then display > the encrypted password? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19839&t=19837 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PPP Authentication CHAP [7:18093]
nothing to do with that.. -Original Message- From: Jaspreet Bhatia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 12:30 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: PPP Authentication CHAP [7:18093] Hello Gaz, I was facing a very similar issue.This is what I did and it may seem strange but it worked for me .I turned on service password-encryption and then CHAP authentication strated working . See if it works for you Jaspreet Gaz wrote: > Hi, > > Can you help me plz guys been trying to get me 1601 with ISDN WIC to work > for yonks. From debug's it looks like CHAP AUTH is failing but I don't know > why ?! > > I have enclosed sh ver, sh run and debug dialer, debug ppp auth chap. > > Any help would be greatly appreciated. > > Thanx in advance. > > Sh ver > > 1601#sh ver > Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software > IOS (tm) 1600 Software (C1600-SY-L), Version 12.0(7)T, RELEASE SOFTWARE > (fc2) > Copyright (c) 1986-1999 by cisco Systems, Inc. > Compiled Mon 06-Dec-99 18:03 by phanguye > Image text-base: 0x0803DCE8, data-base: 0x02005000 > > ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 11.1(7)AX [kuong (7)AX], EARLY DEPLOYMENT > RELEASE > SOFTWARE (fc2) > ROM: 1600 Software (C1600-BOOT-R), Version 11.1(7)AX, EARLY DEPLOYMENT > RELEASE S > OFTWARE (fc2) > > 1601 uptime is 1 hour, 30 minutes > System returned to ROM by power-on > System image file is "flash:/c1600-1207T.bin" > > cisco 1601 (68360) processor (revision C) with 13824K/4608K bytes of memory. > Processor board ID 04909005, with hardware revision > Bridging software. > X.25 software, Version 3.0.0. > Basic Rate ISDN software, Version 1.1. > 1 Ethernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s) > 1 Serial(sync/async) network interface(s) > 1 ISDN Basic Rate interface(s) > System/IO memory with parity disabled > 2048K bytes of DRAM onboard 16384K bytes of DRAM on SIMM > System running from FLASH > 7K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory. > 8192K bytes of processor board PCMCIA flash (Read ONLY) > > Configuration register is 0x2102 > > Sh run > > Building configuration... > > Current configuration: > ! > version 12.0 > service timestamps debug datetime msec > service timestamps log uptime > no service password-encryption > service udp-small-servers > service tcp-small-servers > ! > hostname 1601 > ! > enable secret 5 $1$FgI.$bygzIO/R77k37T.qfBWhH. > ! > username xx password 0 x > ! > ! > ! > ! > ip subnet-zero > no ip domain-lookup > ! > isdn switch-type basic-net3 > isdn voice-call-failure 0 > ! > ! > ! > interface Ethernet0 > ip address 10.10.1.1 255.255.255.0 > no ip directed-broadcast > ip nat inside > no ip route-cache > no ip mroute-cache > ! > interface Serial0 > physical-layer async > bandwidth 64000 > ip unnumbered Ethernet0 > no ip directed-broadcast > encapsulation ppp > no ip route-cache > no ip mroute-cache > keepalive 10 > dialer in-band > dialer wait-for-carrier-time 120 > async mode interactive > fair-queue 64 16 0 > ppp authentication chap callin > ! > interface BRI0 > bandwidth 64 > ip address negotiated > no ip directed-broadcast > ip nat outside > encapsulation ppp > no ip route-cache > no ip mroute-cache > no keepalive > dialer idle-timeout 150 > dialer string 08451400101 > dialer-group 2 > isdn switch-type basic-net3 > ppp authentication chap > ! > ip nat inside source list 100 interface BRI0 overload > ip classless > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 BRI0 > no ip http server > ! > access-list 100 permit ip 10.10.1.0 0.0.0.255 any > access-list 101 deny udp any any eq snmp > access-list 101 deny udp any any eq ntp > access-list 101 permit ip any any > access-list 110 deny udp 10.10.1.0 0.0.0.255 eq netbios-ns any log > dialer-list 1 protocol ip list 110 > dialer-list 2 protocol ip permit > ! > line con 0 > exec-timeout 0 0 > transport input none > line 1 > modem InOut > transport input all > stopbits 1 > speed 115200 > flowcontrol hardware > line vty 0 > exec-timeout 0 0 > login local > length 25 > line vty 1 4 > exec-timeout 0 0 > login local > ! > > 1601#sh deb > Dial on demand: > Dial on demand events debugging is on > PPP: > PPP protocol negotiation debugging is on > ISDN: > ISDN Q931 packets debugging is on > ISDN Q931 packets debug DSLs. (On/Off/No DSL:1/0/-) > DSL 0 --> 1 > 1 - > > 1601#ping 4.1.1.1 > > Type escape sequence to abort. > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 4.1.1.1, timeout is 2 seconds: > > *Mar 1 01:42:51.533: BRI0 DDR: Dialing cause ip (s=10.10.1.1, d=4.1.1.1) > *Mar 1 01:42:51.537: BRI0 DDR: Attempting to dial 08451400101 > *Mar 1 01:42:51.549: ISDN BR0: TX -> SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x04 > *Mar 1 01:42:51.553: Bearer Capability i = 0x8890 > *Mar 1 01:42:51.553: Channel ID i = 0x83 > *Mar 1 01:42:51.557: Called Party Number i = 0x80, '08451400101' > *Mar 1 01:42:51.747: ISDN BR0: RX CONNECT_ACK pd = 8 callref = 0x04 > 01:43:43: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0:2, changed state to up > 01:
Re: unsuscribe [7:19742]
PLEASE DO NOT SEND UNSUBSCRIBE MESSAGES TO THE LIST! FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS GIVEN TO YOU WHEN YOU JOINED OR USE THE FORM ON WWW.GROUPSTUDY.COM. - Original Message - From: "Michal Kozisek" To: Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 8:43 AM Subject: unsuscribe [7:19742] > Please unsuscribe me. > > Thanks > > MIchal > --- > Odchozm zprava neobsahuje viry. > Zkontrolovano antivirov}m systimem AVG > (http://www.grisoft.cz). > Verze: 6.0.277 / Virova baze: 146 - datum vydanm: 5.9.2001 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19753&t=19742 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: The hub from hell... [7:19818]
The hub wants to die. It is time. Let it go. There is nothing you can do to save it. Bid farewell and have it cremated in a burning pile of 5 1/4" floppies. - Original Message - From: "Ole Drews Jensen" To: Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 2:22 PM Subject: RE: The hub from hell... [7:19818] > Do you think it would help flushing the hub with saltwater ??? > > :-) > > Thanks, > > Ole > > ~~~ > Ole Drews Jensen > Systems Network Manager > CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I > RWR Enterprises, Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ~~~ > http://www.RouterChief.com > ~~~ > NEED A JOB ??? > http://www.oledrews.com/job > ~~~ > > > -Original Message- > From: Steve Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 2:00 PM > To: Ole Drews Jensen; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: The hub from hell... [7:19818] > > > Hey Ole, saw this exact same thing with a 3Com hub at a client. I took > out there existing router, replaced it with a 1720, and bam, nothing. > Set the Fast E0 to Half 10 some ports started working, swapped out the > hub with a netgear hub, everything worked. Changed the FastE0 to 100 / > half and all was fine. Put the 3Com in a few weeks later for grins and > giggles, blam, work great. WEIRD! > > Steve > > -Original Message- > From: Ole Drews Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 1:30 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: The hub from hell... [7:19818] > > > This might be slightly off topic, but I would like to get an answer if > someone has one. > > Task: > > To change a remote office from an ISDN connection to a Frame Relay > connection. > > Before: > > Workstations and printers were connected to a 3COM hub that was > connected to > a 700 series ISDN router that was directly connected to another 700 > series > router which was connected to our LAN. > > Everything was working fine, but slow. > > Goal: > > Workstations and printers connect to a 3COM hub that connects to a 1720 > router that has a Frame Relay PVC to a 2620 router that connects to our > LAN. > > Steps: > > I connected the 1720 router to the smartjack and connected it to one > workstation with a crossed cable to from the FastEthernet interface. > > I telnettet into the router and got everything up. I could see the > active > PVC and all was well. > > I rebooted the PC and got an IP address (plus more) from the DHCP server > at > the main office, and logged on to the network without any problems. > > The problem began after I got the workstations and printers shut down, > unplugged the 700 series router from the hub, and connected the 1720 > instead. > > I could not login to the network anymore, and I could not ping, tracert > or > telnet into anything on the LAN. However, I could telnet to the 1720 > router, > and from there ping, tracert and telnet to the rest of the LAN. > > This was weird, because I knew that the hub worked when connected to the > ISDN router, and I knew that the 1720 router could see the LAN, and I > also > knew that it worked with a crossed cable instead of the hub. > > I finally got a hold of a LinkSys switch which I connected instead of > the > hub, and now everything worked fine. > > ? > > Now, what could cause a hub to allow all communication through a port > connected to an ISDN router but not a 1720 router, when they both work > with > a crossed cable and a switch? > > I did by the way also clear the arp cache on all my devices on the > network, > even though the problem didn't really point in that direction. > > Anyone has a clue what's going on, or is it something personal that the > hub > hates the 1720? > > Thanks, > > Ole > > ~~~ > Ole Drews Jensen > Systems Network Manager > CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I > RWR Enterprises, Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ~~~ > http://www.RouterChief.com > ~~~ > NEED A JOB ??? > http://www.oledrews.com/job > ~~~ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19836&t=19818 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2 exams [7:19695]
Of the four CCNP tests, I had the easiest time with the CIT test. Score: 875. Good but not great. If you have been troubleshooting computer and/or router problems for a couple of years or more and of course have put in study time that test should not be to much of a problem. If you have the resources, read over the CiscoPress CIT Certification Guide especially the Foundation Summary for each chapter. Also, look at the CiscoPress CIT book, ExamCram CIT, BrainBuzz CIT StudyGuide, and Boson CIT test #1. Ditto for BCRAN on the reading. For the BCRAN test. Score: 775 Luck to have passed. I really did not like the format is this test. I had 25-30 questions where you picked from an exhibit the command the question was asking for and then had to type in the command which was bad for me since I studied more on theory than actual command structure. This way of testing also slow me down. I had to ensure that I had the correct command and that I correctly typed into the field provided. The level is questions were not as difficult as Routing. KNOW ISDN COLD!!! Some Frame Relay. Know all the ways to remote access a network and which Cisco product fits each way and how these products are used in a SOHO, Remote, and Branch Office. As well as in the corporate HQ. -dlb ""Dwayne Saunders"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi all was just wondering if any one has sat 2 ccnp exams in the single day > as I have BCRAN and CIT at the end of month > Was just wondering if anyone has would they care to pass on some of the > strategies the used > > D'Wayne Saunders > Network Admin > > Ph:08 89507742 > Fax:08 89521112 > Mobile: > > www.lasseters.com.au > > World's First Government Licensed and Regulated Online Casino... > > > *** > This email message (and attachments) may contain information that is > confidential to Lasseters Online. If you are not the intended recipient you > cannot use, distribute or copy the message or attachments. In such a case, > please notify the sender by return email immediately and erase all copies > of the message and attachments. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this message and attachments that do not relate to the official business > of Lasseters Online are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > *** Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19747&t=19695 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IPsec over GRE tunnel to *nix box [7:19554]
I am unsure from your posting if you are looking for an IPsec termination for *nix or a GRE termination for *nix. For the IPsec you can use freeswan: www.freeswan.org I am not sure about implementation of terminating a GRE tunnel directly into a *nix box. I am sure it has been done but I am not aware of any packages that do that. Ed ""Sam Deckert"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hey everyone, > > First and foremost, I hope all people that have been affected by the tragedy > are coping ok - we here in Oz are thinking and praying for you. > > Also, I was just wondering if anyone has ever been able to terminate a GRE > tunnel from a Cisco router to a *nix box of some flavor? I have been > scouring > the net, but havent found anything that can do this as yet. Is this even > possible? > > Thanks for any help/ideas you can provide, and regards > > Sam. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19835&t=19554 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ports and Sockets [7:19701]
At 02:51 PM 9/13/01, Tony van Ree wrote: >Hi, > >Here is what I found at > >http://perlfect.com/articles/sockets.shtml > >Perl, Sockets and TCP/IP Networking. > >An oversimplified introduction to sockets > >Sockets are a mechanism that allows programs to communicate, either on the >same machine or across a network. The way it works is >pretty simple: Each machine on a network is identified by some address. In >this tutorial we will talk about tcp/ip networking, so by >network address we mean an IP address. (like 192.168.4.4) Apart from the >IP address that specifies a machine, each machine has a >number of ports that allow handling multiple connections simultaneously. > >A program that wishes to receive a connection from another program, asks >the operating system to create a socket and bind it to some >port. Then the program sits and listens on the socket it has created to >receive incoming connections. The other program also creates a >socket for communicating witht he receiver. The caller needs to specify >the IP address and the port number of the receiving end. Ah hah. Now that makes sense! ;-) And that's how AppleTalk sockets work too, which explains why the AppleTalk specification uses that term. Of course, AppleTalk also uses "socket" for the field in the packet that identifies the next layer up, which TCP and UDP would call a port. Thanks to everyone who responded! Priscilla >If all >goes well, and as we will see shortly, the two programs establish a >communication through the network using their sockets. The two >programs may exchange information, each by writing to and reading from the >socket it has created. > > > >Just to add a bit to all of this > >Teunis >Hobart, Tasmania >Australia > > >On Wednesday, September 12, 2001 at 09:53:44 PM, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: > > > Ports are used by TCP and UDP to identify the next layer up in the packet. > > > > IP has a Protocol field that has a similar function. > > > > Ethernet II has EtherType. IEEE 802.3 has the 802.2 Service Access Point > > (SAP). IPX and AppleTalk have sockets. > > > > Almost every protocol has some way of specifying what the next layer up > is. > > The recipient uses it to pass the data to the right process. The sender > > also uses it to identify itself. > > > > Socket has another meaning in the Unix world which I have never quite > > understood. Perhaps someone else can explain that. > > > > Priscilla > > > > At 08:25 PM 9/12/01, Dennis Laganiere wrote: > > >Hopefully this will start a new conversation. I've tried to describe the > > >difference between Ports and Sockets. Your thoughts are welcome... > > > > > >Port Numbers are used by IP to pass information to the upper layers; they > > >provide the mechanism for cooperating applications to communicate. Numbers > > >below 1024 are well known ports, and above 1024 are dynamically assigned > > >ports. You will usually find registered ports are for vendor specific > > >applications in the range above 1024. > > > > > >Here are some common IP Ports: > > >20/21 FTP > > >23 Telnet > > >25 SMTP > > >37 Time Service > > >49 TACACS > > >53 DNS > > >67 BootP Server > > >68 BootP Client > > >69 TFTP > > >110 POP3 > > >161 SNMP > > > > > >IPX sockets are part of the IPX stack, and are used much like port numbers > > >in IP; they direct data encapsulation in the IPX Header to the appropriate > > >upper layer protocols. There are well-known ones, others that are > assigned > > >to proprietary applications, and a series of numbers used randomly by > > >clients, just like in IP. Also like IP ports, they identify the process on > > >the server or client that needs to get the data in the packet. > > > > > > Here are some common IPX sockets: > > > 0x451 NCP > > > 0x452 SAP > > > 0x453 RIP > > > 0x455 NetBios > > > 0x456 Diagnostic > > > 0x457 Serialization > > > 0x85be IPX EIGRP > > > 0x9001 NLSP > > > 0x9004 IPXWAN > > > 0x9086 IPX Ping > > > > > > > > >The AppleTalk protocol suite also uses sockets. Socket numbers 1-127 are > > >statically assigned (RTMP uses 1, ZIP uses 6, etc). > > > > > > Priscilla Oppenheimer > > http://www.priscilla.com >-- >www.tasmail.com Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19834&t=19701 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TIME TO STOP RE: 'It's not the US they want to destroy. It's [7:19833]
All and Paul As a muslim I would greatly appreciate that any further insults to the religion of Islam be refrained from this list. And as I have requested along with Priscilla, that this thread and topic discontinue as it both distracting and upsetting. Best Regards -Original Message- From: hal9001 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 2:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 'It's not the US they want to destroy. It's our arrogance' [7:19819] Don't you mean the CULT of ALLAH..any so called religion that encourages this mayhem is a one way ticket to hell. Its nothing more than an evil cult! Karl - Original Message - From: "John Mairs" To: Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 6:20 AM Subject: RE: 'It's not the US they want to destroy. It's our arrogance' [7:19726] > aaammen! > > Allah be paved! > > > --- ed smith wrote: > > Respectfully I would say,,, let people blow some > > steam off! Who the hell > > cares about CISCO right now? > > > > Ed > > > > >From: "Thad Gaston" >To: "ed smith" , >Subject: RE: > > 'It's not the US > > they want to destroy. It's our arrogance' [7:19679] > > >Date: Wed, 12 Sep > > 2001 17:59:42 -0400 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Received: > > from [12.109.97.147] by > > hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id > > MHotMailBD69252000344136E8170C6D619313EB0; Wed, 12 > > Sep 2001 14:56:49 > > -0700 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 12 Sep 2001 > > 14:57:36 -0700 > > >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange > > V6.0.4417.0 >content-class: > > urn:content-classes:message >Message-ID: > > > > >X-MS-Has-Attach: >X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: > > >Thread-Topic: 'It's not the US > > they want to destroy. It's our arrogance' [7:19679] > > >Thread-Index: > > AcE71YI1yqc/7joNR3ugD6ApyYlA6wAAC/Bg > >All, > >I > > would discourage any > > further post regarding this topic as it becoming > > >more and more useless > > and distracting. None of our sentiments are going > > >to bring back the > > lives of those that have passed on nor bring about > > the >justice the we > > all would like to see. Let's keep the list on track > > and >get back to what > > this list is intended for. > >Regards, > >Thad > > Gaston > >-Original > > Message- >From: ed smith > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: > > Wednesday, September 12, 2001 5:36 PM >To: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: > > Re: 'It's not the US they want to destroy. It's our > > arrogance' >[7:19679] > > > > >That is the biggest load of crap I've ever > > heard! >The people we > > see dancing in the streets of Palestine are > > brainwashed! > >The common > > person in the middle east would give anything to > > come and >live in >the > > U.S. and get out of their hell hole they call home. > > Believe me, I >did 2 > > >years there, it sucks!!! Nothing worth keeping in > > that part of the > > >World. > >I don't see all those God forsaken > > countries having a problem > > with >people >wanting to immigrate there! > >If they > > believe they are > > God's chosen people, why didn't he make them >from > > >Hawaii, or > > Switzerland, or some other nice part of this World? > > > >They don't have > > the open airways or free flow of information to make > > >logical >decisions. > > They only believe what their ignorant and jealous > > leaders >tell >them. > > > >They wanted a "Holy War" I think they have it,, > > > Holy @!#$ Ahkmed, > > here comes a Tomahawk missile! > Holy @!#$ Al-@!#$, > > here comes a flights > > of F-15's!!! > Holy @!#$ Al-Khobar, I think I'm > > going to see Allah! > > > >Wait and see brings new meaning to "bombs > > bursting in air". > >YOU > > SEEM TWISTED, according to your last email anyway. > > > > > > > > > >_ > > >Get > > your FREE download of MSN Explorer at > > >http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp > > > misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at > > http://explorer.msn.com > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > = > John L. Mairs > > __ > Terrorist Attacks on U.S. - How can you help? > Donate cash, emergency relief information > http://dailynews.yahoo.com/fc/US/Emergency_Information/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19833&t=19833 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 'It's not the US they want to destroy. It's our arrogance' [7:19832]
Hey moron if we're so bad why don't you boycott us. That is right you can't. Oh I get it you'll use all our products and services but our guns and bullets killed your kids and cops. Na it was your enlightened citizens that did that. I think you got it backwards we listen to every piss-ant toothless nation (yours included). That is gonna change I think Bush and our congress made it clear either you are with us or against us. My advice send them out or we're coming in. Oh and I am sorry I called you a moron your "English" your a twit. Don - Original Message - From: "A non-American" To: Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 10:20 AM Subject: RE: 'It's not the US they want to destroy. It's our arrogance' [7:19805] > Gutless ? What cause would you train months for with a guarantee of death or > life imprisonment ? > > The facts as I see them are - > > A. the victims were blameless and deserved nothing of what they received. My > heart goes out especially to the rescue crews, imagine dying trying to help! > > B. the organisation and commitment was amazing, in a nuclear world > retaliation must be very precise and fully calculated rather than knee-jerk. > Do not underestimate these people, it would be very dumb indeed to assume > that they are less intelligent than yourselves. > > C. many reading this will not like this but the actions of the US government > for decades has been in the interest of the US and much blood has been spilt > by them and 3rd parties funded by them. Is the hatred you feel for your > attackers of your people less valid than theirs ? What attack against these > people would you find unacceptable ? The gloves are off - no ? Somebody else > out there feels this against your country. The US must try and find these > people to make them answer for this but must also look inwards at the same > time!! priority is to stop it happening again no ? Look at the tit for tat > mess Israel is in... > > I'm English and for a long time American money has paid for bullets and > semtex used in my country - children are dead as are many policemen not to > mention the civilians popped off because they have the wrong religion. The > level of ignorance in the US is truly amazing, everybody outside the US is > disgusted by this act but not many are asking why, we've got a pretty good > idea. > > Word of advice - we get CNN too and it's biased as hell, listen to the news > from somewhere ANYWHERE else once in a while. > > A non-American > > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Fenech, William J > Sent: 13 September 2001 01:55 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: 'It's not the US they want to destroy. It's our arrogance' > [7:19699] > > > Don't waste your time with idiots like this (aka Reeta Sinha). The people > who pulled off this gutless act, and the ones who support them should be > exterminated, pure and simple. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19832&t=19832 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Static Route Info [7:19817]
Anal? boy I think not IMO... Many thanks for the tipwe have quite a few (over 30) static routes due to partnerships, etc. Remembering what they are for, and why they are on a certain routers (and not others) ...well we keep it in an excel spreadsheet...A real pain during t/s. HOWEVER the trusty ? states: ip route 1.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 2.2.2.2 ? name Specify name of the next hop is it just a descriptor or does it do a dns lookup? Anyone KNOW FOR SURE? (looking on EVERYONE'S search engine as I type) TroyC -Original Message- From: Wright, Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 11:30 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Static Route Info [7:19817] I figured out how to put a description on a static route. I know it probably won't help many of you, but this is one of the anal things I had to do for my boss: ip route 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 2.2.2.2 name static route to web server Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19831&t=19817 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The hub from hell... [7:19818]
Do you think it would help flushing the hub with saltwater ??? :-) Thanks, Ole ~~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~~~ NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job ~~~ -Original Message- From: Steve Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 2:00 PM To: Ole Drews Jensen; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: The hub from hell... [7:19818] Hey Ole, saw this exact same thing with a 3Com hub at a client. I took out there existing router, replaced it with a 1720, and bam, nothing. Set the Fast E0 to Half 10 some ports started working, swapped out the hub with a netgear hub, everything worked. Changed the FastE0 to 100 / half and all was fine. Put the 3Com in a few weeks later for grins and giggles, blam, work great. WEIRD! Steve -Original Message- From: Ole Drews Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 1:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: The hub from hell... [7:19818] This might be slightly off topic, but I would like to get an answer if someone has one. Task: To change a remote office from an ISDN connection to a Frame Relay connection. Before: Workstations and printers were connected to a 3COM hub that was connected to a 700 series ISDN router that was directly connected to another 700 series router which was connected to our LAN. Everything was working fine, but slow. Goal: Workstations and printers connect to a 3COM hub that connects to a 1720 router that has a Frame Relay PVC to a 2620 router that connects to our LAN. Steps: I connected the 1720 router to the smartjack and connected it to one workstation with a crossed cable to from the FastEthernet interface. I telnettet into the router and got everything up. I could see the active PVC and all was well. I rebooted the PC and got an IP address (plus more) from the DHCP server at the main office, and logged on to the network without any problems. The problem began after I got the workstations and printers shut down, unplugged the 700 series router from the hub, and connected the 1720 instead. I could not login to the network anymore, and I could not ping, tracert or telnet into anything on the LAN. However, I could telnet to the 1720 router, and from there ping, tracert and telnet to the rest of the LAN. This was weird, because I knew that the hub worked when connected to the ISDN router, and I knew that the 1720 router could see the LAN, and I also knew that it worked with a crossed cable instead of the hub. I finally got a hold of a LinkSys switch which I connected instead of the hub, and now everything worked fine. ? Now, what could cause a hub to allow all communication through a port connected to an ISDN router but not a 1720 router, when they both work with a crossed cable and a switch? I did by the way also clear the arp cache on all my devices on the network, even though the problem didn't really point in that direction. Anyone has a clue what's going on, or is it something personal that the hub hates the 1720? Thanks, Ole ~~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~~~ NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job ~~~ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19830&t=19818 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The hub from hell... [7:19818]
Hey Ole, saw this exact same thing with a 3Com hub at a client. I took out there existing router, replaced it with a 1720, and bam, nothing. Set the Fast E0 to Half 10 some ports started working, swapped out the hub with a netgear hub, everything worked. Changed the FastE0 to 100 / half and all was fine. Put the 3Com in a few weeks later for grins and giggles, blam, work great. WEIRD! Steve -Original Message- From: Ole Drews Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 1:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: The hub from hell... [7:19818] This might be slightly off topic, but I would like to get an answer if someone has one. Task: To change a remote office from an ISDN connection to a Frame Relay connection. Before: Workstations and printers were connected to a 3COM hub that was connected to a 700 series ISDN router that was directly connected to another 700 series router which was connected to our LAN. Everything was working fine, but slow. Goal: Workstations and printers connect to a 3COM hub that connects to a 1720 router that has a Frame Relay PVC to a 2620 router that connects to our LAN. Steps: I connected the 1720 router to the smartjack and connected it to one workstation with a crossed cable to from the FastEthernet interface. I telnettet into the router and got everything up. I could see the active PVC and all was well. I rebooted the PC and got an IP address (plus more) from the DHCP server at the main office, and logged on to the network without any problems. The problem began after I got the workstations and printers shut down, unplugged the 700 series router from the hub, and connected the 1720 instead. I could not login to the network anymore, and I could not ping, tracert or telnet into anything on the LAN. However, I could telnet to the 1720 router, and from there ping, tracert and telnet to the rest of the LAN. This was weird, because I knew that the hub worked when connected to the ISDN router, and I knew that the 1720 router could see the LAN, and I also knew that it worked with a crossed cable instead of the hub. I finally got a hold of a LinkSys switch which I connected instead of the hub, and now everything worked fine. ? Now, what could cause a hub to allow all communication through a port connected to an ISDN router but not a 1720 router, when they both work with a crossed cable and a switch? I did by the way also clear the arp cache on all my devices on the network, even though the problem didn't really point in that direction. Anyone has a clue what's going on, or is it something personal that the hub hates the 1720? Thanks, Ole ~~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~~~ NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job ~~~ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19828&t=19818 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 'It's not the US they want to destroy. It's our arrogance' [7:19829]
All - I know that emotions are high right now, and energies are in different directions, however: The koran states that suicide is wrong and against God. There are a significant number of desparate people who have inappropraitely decided that killing themselves is the way to achieve a goal, and specific religious factions have pushed them to the breaking point. I am a Zionist and Jewish, and have many friends in Israel. I have Arab and Muslim friends also. Please, do not target all Arabs or Muslims in reaction to this week's actions. Please, become mindful that security in the US has always been too lax and that we as a people need to change this. We need to punish those responsible for this attack and work to prevent future attacks, but attacking innocents and stereotyping cannot show the world our enlightenment as Americans. As to the board's role I will let others moderate that function. I would encourage everyone to work through the anger and fear that they are feeling and channel that energy towards positive ends. Peace. --- hal9001 wrote: > Don't you mean the CULT of ALLAH..any so called > religion that encourages > this mayhem is a one way ticket to hell. Its > nothing more than an evil > cult! > > Karl > - Original Message - > From: "John Mairs" > To: > Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 6:20 AM > Subject: RE: 'It's not the US they want to destroy. > It's our arrogance' > [7:19726] > > > > aaammen! > > > > Allah be paved! > > > > > > --- ed smith wrote: > > > Respectfully I would say,,, let people blow some > > > steam off! Who the hell > > > cares about CISCO right now? > > > > > > Ed > > > > > > >From: "Thad Gaston" >To: "ed smith" , >Subject: > RE: > > > 'It's not the US > > > they want to destroy. It's our arrogance' > [7:19679] > > > >Date: Wed, 12 Sep > > > 2001 17:59:42 -0400 >MIME-Version: 1.0 > >Received: > > > from [12.109.97.147] by > > > hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id > > > MHotMailBD69252000344136E8170C6D619313EB0; Wed, > 12 > > > Sep 2001 14:56:49 > > > -0700 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 12 Sep 2001 > > > 14:57:36 -0700 > > > >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange > > > V6.0.4417.0 >content-class: > > > urn:content-classes:message >Message-ID: > > > > > > >X-MS-Has-Attach: >X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: > > > >Thread-Topic: 'It's not the US > > > they want to destroy. It's our arrogance' > [7:19679] > > > >Thread-Index: > > > AcE71YI1yqc/7joNR3ugD6ApyYlA6wAAC/Bg > >All, > > >I > > > would discourage any > > > further post regarding this topic as it becoming > > > >more and more useless > > > and distracting. None of our sentiments are > going > > > >to bring back the > > > lives of those that have passed on nor bring > about > > > the >justice the we > > > all would like to see. Let's keep the list on > track > > > and >get back to what > > > this list is intended for. > >Regards, > >Thad > > > Gaston > >-Original > > > Message- >From: ed smith > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: > > > Wednesday, September 12, 2001 5:36 PM >To: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: > > > Re: 'It's not the US they want to destroy. It's > our > > > arrogance' >[7:19679] > > > > > >That is the biggest load of crap I've ever > > > heard! >The people we > > > see dancing in the streets of Palestine are > > > brainwashed! > >The common > > > person in the middle east would give anything to > > > come and >live in >the > > > U.S. and get out of their hell hole they call > home. > > > Believe me, I >did 2 > > > >years there, it sucks!!! Nothing worth keeping > in > > > that part of the > > > >World. > >I don't see all those God forsaken > > > countries having a problem > > > with >people >wanting to immigrate there! > >If > they > > > believe they are > > > God's chosen people, why didn't he make them > >from > > > >Hawaii, or > > > Switzerland, or some other nice part of this > World? > > > > >They don't have > > > the open airways or free flow of information to > make > > > >logical >decisions. > > > They only believe what their ignorant and > jealous > > > leaders >tell >them. > > > > >They wanted a "Holy War" I think they have > it,, > > > > Holy @!#$ Ahkmed, > > > here comes a Tomahawk missile! > Holy @!#$ > Al-@!#$, > > > here comes a flights > > > of F-15's!!! > Holy @!#$ Al-Khobar, I think I'm > > > going to see Allah! > > > > >Wait and see brings new meaning to "bombs > > > bursting in air". > >YOU > > > SEEM TWISTED, according to your last email > anyway. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >_ > > > >Get > > > your FREE download of MSN Explorer at > > > >http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp > > > > misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at > > > http://explorer.msn.com > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > = > > John L. Mairs > > > > ___
Re: A plan to rebuild.... [7:19611]
Maybe I am an Idiot (well, there is no doubt that I am
but still...)
If I remember right, when I was in Canada and driving
back into the United States it was the responsibility
of the Customs officers of the United States that were
responible for checking my apples and bananas (and
cemtex and bullets), I don't remember seeing even
ONE Canadian officer there, ehh?
granted I was twelve at the time (two years ago...
well, in terms of maturity)...
is border protection responsibility like the polarity
of the North and South poles? If so, shouldn't it
still be 20,000 more years before we have the
Canadians and the US officers changing booths.
--- Stephen Mole wrote:
> Take a freakin hike Dipshit. What? they wouldn't
> have found another way in?
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Leigh Anne Chisholm"
> To:
> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 11:14 PM
> Subject: RE: A plan to rebuild [7:19611]
>
>
> > I guess you're not aware of Canada's reputation as
> being a haven for
> > murderers and terrorists. Once these people are
> here, we can't deport
> them
> > because of goofy Canadian politics. When these
> people come into Canada,
> > Canada has a responsibility to ensure these people
> don't have undesirable
> > backgrounds. Then when they're here, it's easy
> for them to get forged
> > documents indicating that they are Canadian
> citizens. That makes the US
> > immigration department's job more difficult
> because of the free flowing
> > policy of letting Canadians pass through the US
> border with a minimum of
> > background checking. It's the freedom that Canada
> enjoys with the US
> that's
> > at risk unless our Government steps up to the
> plate and tightens things
> up.
> > How often have you heard after the fact that
> Canada Immigration didn't
> > investigate into people's backgrounds properly?
> Far too often I'm afraid.
> >
> > It wasn't the Canadian immigration department that
> stopped the guy heading
> > into the US to blow up LAX on the millenium... it
> was the US immigration
> > department.
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > > Torren Craigie-Manson
> > > Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 8:22 PM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Re: A plan to rebuild [7:19611]
> > >
> > >
> > > > > --- Leigh Anne Chisholm wrote:
> > > {snip}
> > > > > > I would really hope that of all the things
> that come out of this,
> if
> > > it's
> > > > > > found that the terrorists came through
> Canada, the US
> > > whacks Canadian
> > > > > > politicians upside the head for their lax
> immigration policies and
> > > > > > incompetent information service (Canada's
> version of the FBI).
> They
> > > should
> > > > > > have been tracking those terrorists the
> second they entered
> Canada.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > **I** am not impressed...
> > > > > >
> > >
> > > Leigh Anne,
> > >
> > > Perhaps you can explain to me why you feel that
> Canadian
> > > authorities should
> > > have spotted these terrorists, but you make no
> mention of the
> > > failure of US
> > > authorities to spot them. Your statement is
> illogical and insulting to
> the
> > > integrity of Canada.
> > >
> > > This is an emotionally charged situation for
> people around the
> > > world. Please
> > > take a minute to stop and think before you
> appoint yourself judge
> > > and jury,
> > > and begin pointing fingers at _anyone_.
> > >
> > > Torren
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=
John L. Mairs
__
Terrorist Attacks on U.S. - How can you help?
Donate cash, emergency relief information
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/fc/US/Emergency_Information/
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19827&t=19611
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Dual FIFO? [7:19691]
I understand that concept but I haven't been able to connect that to the dual FIFO queue. How does fragmentation relate to the dual queue? If I follow Cisco's suggestion and use a fragmentation size of 1600 then no fragmentation is actually occurring, yet the dual FIFO queue is implemented. I have this nagging feeling that I'm just missing something that I should have figured out by now. Thanks, John >>> "MADMAN" 9/13/01 9:01:55 AM >>> The bottom line is you fragment data packets, never voice, so that a voice packets, which are small, never get queued behind a 1500 byte packet. The rule of thumb I think is you don't want more than 150ms delay in any voice packets or you may as well dump it. dave Stephen Skinner wrote: > > the only thing i could find was this > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/788/voice-qos/voip-ov-fr-qos.pdf > > which says > > "Turn on fragmentation for low speed links (less than 1.5Mbps). > Set the fragment size so voice packets are not fragmented and do not > experience a serialization delay greater than 20 ms. > > Lowest Link Speed in Path Recommended Fragmentation Size > > 56Kbps 70 bytes > 64Kbps 80 bytes > 128Kbps 160 bytes > 256Kbps 320 bytes > 512Kbps 640 bytes > 768Kbps 1000 bytes > 1536Kbps 1600 bytes > > Note: For 1536 Kbps, no fragmentation is technically needed, but > fragmentation is needed to enable the dual first-in, first-out > (FIFO) queueing system to ensure voice quality. A fragment size of 1600 > bytes enables the dual FIFO, but since 1600 bytes is > higher than the typical serial interface maximum transmission unit (MTU), > large data packets are not fragmented. > > from what it says it`s just multple "stack" queue > > sorry i can`t be of more help.. > > Cheers > > steve > >From: "John Neiberger" > >Reply-To: "John Neiberger" > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Dual FIFO? [7:19691] > >Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 18:34:53 -0400 > > > >When configuring VoIP on T-1 links, I see that CCO suggests turning on > >frame relay fragmentation with a fragment size of 1600 simply to turn on > >the dual fifo queue. What is that? I'm familiar with the single fifo > >but what is dual fifo and how does it work? > > > >I've searched CCO and all I can find is how to turn it on. I have yet > >to find any sort of explanation. > > > >thanks! > > > >John > _ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19826&t=19691 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 'It's not the US they want to destroy. It's our arrogance' [7:19825]
I have a hard time understanding that "arrogance" on the part of a nation deserves any punishment from another. Is not the punisher of arrogance even more arrogant?... shame on Reeta Sinha. How can you justify any violence in the light of arrogance?... certainly not mass murder of mothers, fathers and children. If Reeta thinks that America somehow deserves this tragedy or "had it coming", then please, please go to some other country to live that is more agreeable to your conscience... leave us Americans to mourn our loss with reverance, because to have you here among us is a disgraceful abomination. signed: I withhold my name in case you want to drive a plane into my neighborhood because of MY arrogance. __ Terrorist Attacks on U.S. - How can you help? Donate cash, emergency relief information http://dailynews.yahoo.com/fc/US/Emergency_Information/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19825&t=19825 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Denial of service attack prevention [7:19568]
Heres a good solaris security article, likey applicable to other nixes.. http://www.samag.com/articles/2000/0013/0013c/0013c.htm Brian "Sonic" Whalen Success = Preparation + Opportunity On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, MADMAN wrote: > I don't know what else on the router you could do but there are things > you can do on your host but not being a sys admin I can't get into > details. Check this out: > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/4.html > > Dave > > Haydn Solomon wrote: > > > > Actually I was asking what OTHER means than tcp intercept there was > > because we don't have the version that supports it. Can you answer that? > > I know that our version doesn't cause I checked with the "?" feature and > > the option isn't there. In any case here is a copy of the sh ver. > > > > Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software > > IOS (tm) RSP Software (RSP-ISV-M), Version 12.0(15), RELEASE SOFTWARE > > (fc1) > > Copyright (c) 1986-2000 by cisco Systems, Inc. > > Compiled Wed 27-Dec-00 13:54 by linda > > Image text-base: 0x60010930, data-base: 0x60C46000 > > > > ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 11.1(8)CA1, EARLY DEPLOYMENT RELEASE > > SOFTWARE (fc1) > > BOOTFLASH: GS Software (RSP-BOOT-M), Version 11.1(22)CA, EARLY > > DEPLOYMENT RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) > > > > -- Haydn > > > > -Original Message- > > From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 11:05 AM > > To: Haydn Solomon > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Denial of service attack prevention [7:19568] > > > > send a sh ver of your router, not all platforms support TCP Intercept. > > > > Dave > > > > Haydn Solomon wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I was recently reading an article on ciscos site about strategies for > > > preventing denial of service attacks. They mentioned the ip intercept > > > configuration feature for IOS version 11.3. However our routers are > > > running version 12.0 and doesnt have that feature. Does anyone out > > > there know what other effective strategies can be used to prevent this > > > kind of attack on IOS versions other than 11.3? Any input will be > > > appreciated, thanks. > > > > > > -Haydn > > -- > > David Madland > > Sr. Network Engineer > > CCIE# 2016 > > Qwest Communications Int. Inc. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > 612-664-3367 > > > > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" > > > > _ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > -- > David Madland > Sr. Network Engineer > CCIE# 2016 > Qwest Communications Int. Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 612-664-3367 > > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19824&t=19568 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: blocking music city [7:19806]
I ran into an article that classifies napster traffic and you can limit the amount of bandwith to use. however is there something the classifies mp3 traffic and from there implement a policy routing? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Allen May Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 11:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: blocking music city [7:19806] The easiest way is to create access-lists to block the authentication servers (if applicable) or the site itself. Keep in mind that many large sites own an entire subnet of IPs for load balancing so it may require more than just the first IP you see when you ping by name. If it's on a Microsoft network, Profiles can be activated to only allow specific applications to run. Disallowing setup.exe can be very discouraging to users as well ;) PIX can block ActiveX content as well. Lastly, but probably most importantly, usage conduct must be put into place & made known to all users. - Original Message - From: "george gittins" To: Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 12:38 PM Subject: blocking music city [7:19806] > I work for a School District and i was wondering if any one here knew howw > to block > programs such as Music City, or as know as morpheus, or gnutella. I running > cisco equipment 3810 at each site , and a pix. > has someone done it or any pointers will work. > also we use aol instant messanger to comunicate with the campuses, but we > want to restrict users the have aol but using the network to access the > internet. its a difficult scenario but would appreciate if someone knew a > solution Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19823&t=19806 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 'It's not the US they want to destroy. It's our arrogance' [7:19822]
One important thing that I would like to add is this - We may be taking our lumps but we certainly were not knocked off! WE ARE STILL "KING OF THE HILL"! Tim -Original Message- From: Bill Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 5:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 'It's not the US they want to destroy. It's our arrogance' [7:19675] As I read your posting and write this response, I fear the sheer anger and absolute outrage I feel at your comments will unhinge me. You speak of our "American arrogance", yet give no thought or credit for the untold times that we've fought and DIED for the Little Guy. When smaller countries have had horrible disasters, AMERICANS were there first to help. Your message oozes with sympathy for the attackers - not the victims. These terrorists murdered THOUSANDS of CIVILIANS who may not even know where Afghanistan or the Middle East are. There is no punishment dyer enough for these monsters! How would you feel, if in a few years, one of these monsters detonates a suitcase sized nuclear device at a sporting event with millions watching? Perhaps in your neighborhood? No, this isn't the David and Goliath story. It's the story of radicalism at it's worst. These individuals only want to expand their name at the expense of any infamy. They have no moral center. THEY WANT NETWORK FACE TIME! The boy in your analogy, who came from behind to knock "The King of the Hill" down, was also faceless and a coward just as these attackers. >From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" >Reply-To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: 'It's not the US they want to destroy. It's our arrogance' >[7:19655] >Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 15:33:10 -0400 > >Reeta Sinha >'It's not the US they want to destroy. It's our arrogance' > >During winters when I was little, the boys on my block played a game called >King of the Hill. After storms, snowplows clearing the streets would leave >behind huge hills of dense, packed snow hills 15 to 20 feet high. The game >was simple. The one who reached the top of the hill and kept everyone else >off it was the King of the Hill. Boys would scramble up the hill, shoving >and pushing each other, sometimes sending a playmate tumbling to the >ground. >It was a rough game and usually it was the bully who made it to the top. >The >biggest, loudest, meanest kid on the block became the King of the Hill. The >others -- smaller and weaker -- tumbled down quickly or were thrown off by >the King, if they got close to the top of the hill. > >Standing a safe distance away, I would watch the boys who were knocked off >the hill over and over again. They never looked defeated. With their chins >set, they would get up from the ground, brush the snow off their clothes >and, after grabbing handfuls of snow, climb up the hill again, determined >to >topple the King. What they lacked in bulk and height, they made up for with >creativity (icy snow shoved inside a shirt pretty much paralyzes any >bully). >Inevitably, the bully's arrogance was his downfall. Confident that he, the >King, was the biggest, the strongest, the best and so certain that the >others were puny and dumb, the bully usually didn't see the boy sneaking up >behind him. The one who, with one shove, sent the former King sliding >headfirst down the hill. > >The smaller boys didn't really care who was the King of the Hill. That >snowy >kingdom would be gone come spring. It was the bully's attitude, his >assumption that he deserved to be King that made the boys so determined. >Without treaties or negotiation, they would band together and attack the >King, just to see him take a fall. > >Bullies, kings, dictators, meanies don't seem to get it, do they? The more >they push, the more they shove, the more they flex their muscles, the more >determined it makes those they ridicule and bully. > >The world has seen this human drama played out time and time again >throughout history, sometimes by individuals, sometimes with entire peoples >with uprisings. In fact and fiction, those who are pushed frequently and >far >enough, always push back. > >It happened again on September 11, 2001. When terrorists crashed passenger >planes into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon building in the US, >someone, some group of people, was pushing back. The message seems pretty >clear: the wealthy, powerful king had to be knocked off the hill. > >Perhaps this is not the time to criticize a country that has suffered such >great loss of life. But, as I have listened to news reports and watched the >horrific images for the past several hours, the most recent showing a >second >plane aiming directly for the World Trade Center, crashing through a tower >as onlookers scream, I can't help but wonder. What would drive some people >to take such extreme measures? Why would anyone go to these lengths to hurt >the United States? > >I can come up with only one answer. It's not us they hate. It's no
Re: 'It's not the US they want to destroy. It's our arrogance' [7:19821]
> C. many reading this will not like this but the actions of the US government > for decades has been in the interest of the US and much blood has been spilt > by them and 3rd parties funded by them. Decades? Gee, I would say centuries. You speak of ignorance, yet you make such a foolish and psuedo-enlightened remark as this? The actions of every single nation in the world are taken in their own best interests. I hope that every action taken by my governent is taken in our, as Americans, collective best interest. I don't pay taxes to fund best interests of the rest of the world... thats what charity is for. >Is the hatred you feel for your > attackers of your people less valid than theirs ? What attack against these > people would you find unacceptable ? The gloves are off - no ? Somebody else > out there feels this against your country. But the reasons are very different. > The US must try and find these > people to make them answer for this but must also look inwards at the same > time!! priority is to stop it happening again no ? Look at the tit for tat > mess Israel is in... Tit for tat? Israel has been fighting with gloves on for far too long, in my opinion. They have the capacity to obliterate the Palestinians, and have not. Would thier adversary act with such restraint? The answer, to anyone who knows what goes on over there, is a resounding no. The Palestinians have one goal; to drive the Israeli into the sea. If that same goal were shared by the Isralei, the task would have been accomplished. > > I'm English and for a long time American money has paid for bullets and > semtex used in my country - Money from Americans is not the same as American money, I say. Yes, we have alot of Irish Americans who fund the IRA and their ilk, but we have a far greater number that fund humanitarian efforts. To imply otherwise is arrogant, far more arrogant than you accuse your American brother of being. And for the Irish, to imply that the UK is blameless is shameless. >children are dead as are many policemen not to > mention the civilians popped off because they have the wrong religion. Protestants kill Catholics too, mate. And those Protestants get their bullets from?? > The > level of ignorance in the US is truly amazing, everybody outside the US is > disgusted by this act but not many are asking why, we've got a pretty good > idea. > When it happens in London, we'll see what song you're singing. I don't think too many brits were complaining about American bullets during either of the World Wars. I wonder how the Argentines felt about Brittish bullets in the Falklands... I wonder how many people in India, in China, in Egypt, Tunisia, Syria, Iran, Iraq, Saudi Arabil, Pakistan, Afganistan feel still about British Imperialism. The list goes on. Face facts... when England hade the resources, nothing made them happier than trying to dominate the entire world. "The sun never sets on the British Empire". Well, the sun set some time ago, and don't try to play Mr. Benevolant now. And don't veil your envy so thinly... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19821&t=19821 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 'It's not the US they want to destroy. It's our arrogance' [7:19820]
A non-American wrote: > > Gutless ? What cause would you train months for with a guarantee of death or > life imprisonment ? > > The facts as I see them are - > > A. the victims were blameless and deserved nothing of what they received. My > heart goes out especially to the rescue crews, imagine dying trying to help! > > B. the organisation and commitment was amazing, in a nuclear world > retaliation must be very precise and fully calculated rather than knee-jerk. > Do not underestimate these people, it would be very dumb indeed to assume > that they are less intelligent than yourselves. Don't think anyone rational is assuming these people are dumb. > > C. many reading this will not like this but the actions of the US government > for decades has been in the interest of the US and much blood has been spilt > by them and 3rd parties funded by them. Is the hatred you feel for your > attackers of your people less valid than theirs ? What attack against these > people would you find unacceptable ? The gloves are off - no ? Somebody else > out there feels this against your country. The US must try and find these > people to make them answer for this but must also look inwards at the same > time!! priority is to stop it happening again no ? Look at the tit for tat > mess Israel is in... Yes and the UK or wherever your from only has an interest in France, Germany, Ireland etc..., ya right you self rightous European can you say WWI, WWII, Crusades, etc... > > I'm English and for a long time American money has paid for bullets and > semtex used in my country - children are dead as are many policemen not to > mention the civilians popped off because they have the wrong religion. The > level of ignorance in the US is truly amazing, everybody outside the US is > disgusted by this act but not many are asking why, we've got a pretty good > idea. > > Word of advice - we get CNN too and it's biased as hell, listen to the news > from somewhere ANYWHERE else once in a while. I agree that CNN, Clinton News Network is biased to the liberal left and of coarse the news is aimed at Americans so I suppose it's not tailored to UK audiences, what's your point?? You can pick ANY country and find faults, we are, after all, made up of imperfect people but we are the model for freedom throughout the world and therefore a big target also. AN AMERICAN who is not AFRAID to use his name Dave > > A non-American > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Fenech, William J > Sent: 13 September 2001 01:55 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: 'It's not the US they want to destroy. It's our arrogance' > [7:19699] > > Don't waste your time with idiots like this (aka Reeta Sinha). The people > who pulled off this gutless act, and the ones who support them should be > exterminated, pure and simple. -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19820&t=19820 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 'It's not the US they want to destroy. It's our arrogance' [7:19819]
Don't you mean the CULT of ALLAH..any so called religion that encourages this mayhem is a one way ticket to hell. Its nothing more than an evil cult! Karl - Original Message - From: "John Mairs" To: Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 6:20 AM Subject: RE: 'It's not the US they want to destroy. It's our arrogance' [7:19726] > aaammen! > > Allah be paved! > > > --- ed smith wrote: > > Respectfully I would say,,, let people blow some > > steam off! Who the hell > > cares about CISCO right now? > > > > Ed > > > > >From: "Thad Gaston" >To: "ed smith" , >Subject: RE: > > 'It's not the US > > they want to destroy. It's our arrogance' [7:19679] > > >Date: Wed, 12 Sep > > 2001 17:59:42 -0400 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Received: > > from [12.109.97.147] by > > hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id > > MHotMailBD69252000344136E8170C6D619313EB0; Wed, 12 > > Sep 2001 14:56:49 > > -0700 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 12 Sep 2001 > > 14:57:36 -0700 > > >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange > > V6.0.4417.0 >content-class: > > urn:content-classes:message >Message-ID: > > > > >X-MS-Has-Attach: >X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: > > >Thread-Topic: 'It's not the US > > they want to destroy. It's our arrogance' [7:19679] > > >Thread-Index: > > AcE71YI1yqc/7joNR3ugD6ApyYlA6wAAC/Bg > >All, > >I > > would discourage any > > further post regarding this topic as it becoming > > >more and more useless > > and distracting. None of our sentiments are going > > >to bring back the > > lives of those that have passed on nor bring about > > the >justice the we > > all would like to see. Let's keep the list on track > > and >get back to what > > this list is intended for. > >Regards, > >Thad > > Gaston > >-Original > > Message- >From: ed smith > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: > > Wednesday, September 12, 2001 5:36 PM >To: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: > > Re: 'It's not the US they want to destroy. It's our > > arrogance' >[7:19679] > > > > >That is the biggest load of crap I've ever > > heard! >The people we > > see dancing in the streets of Palestine are > > brainwashed! > >The common > > person in the middle east would give anything to > > come and >live in >the > > U.S. and get out of their hell hole they call home. > > Believe me, I >did 2 > > >years there, it sucks!!! Nothing worth keeping in > > that part of the > > >World. > >I don't see all those God forsaken > > countries having a problem > > with >people >wanting to immigrate there! > >If they > > believe they are > > God's chosen people, why didn't he make them >from > > >Hawaii, or > > Switzerland, or some other nice part of this World? > > > >They don't have > > the open airways or free flow of information to make > > >logical >decisions. > > They only believe what their ignorant and jealous > > leaders >tell >them. > > > >They wanted a "Holy War" I think they have it,, > > > Holy @!#$ Ahkmed, > > here comes a Tomahawk missile! > Holy @!#$ Al-@!#$, > > here comes a flights > > of F-15's!!! > Holy @!#$ Al-Khobar, I think I'm > > going to see Allah! > > > >Wait and see brings new meaning to "bombs > > bursting in air". > >YOU > > SEEM TWISTED, according to your last email anyway. > > > > > > > > > >_ > > >Get > > your FREE download of MSN Explorer at > > >http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp > > > misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at > > http://explorer.msn.com > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > = > John L. Mairs > > __ > Terrorist Attacks on U.S. - How can you help? > Donate cash, emergency relief information > http://dailynews.yahoo.com/fc/US/Emergency_Information/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19819&t=19819 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The hub from hell... [7:19818]
This might be slightly off topic, but I would like to get an answer if someone has one. Task: To change a remote office from an ISDN connection to a Frame Relay connection. Before: Workstations and printers were connected to a 3COM hub that was connected to a 700 series ISDN router that was directly connected to another 700 series router which was connected to our LAN. Everything was working fine, but slow. Goal: Workstations and printers connect to a 3COM hub that connects to a 1720 router that has a Frame Relay PVC to a 2620 router that connects to our LAN. Steps: I connected the 1720 router to the smartjack and connected it to one workstation with a crossed cable to from the FastEthernet interface. I telnettet into the router and got everything up. I could see the active PVC and all was well. I rebooted the PC and got an IP address (plus more) from the DHCP server at the main office, and logged on to the network without any problems. The problem began after I got the workstations and printers shut down, unplugged the 700 series router from the hub, and connected the 1720 instead. I could not login to the network anymore, and I could not ping, tracert or telnet into anything on the LAN. However, I could telnet to the 1720 router, and from there ping, tracert and telnet to the rest of the LAN. This was weird, because I knew that the hub worked when connected to the ISDN router, and I knew that the 1720 router could see the LAN, and I also knew that it worked with a crossed cable instead of the hub. I finally got a hold of a LinkSys switch which I connected instead of the hub, and now everything worked fine. ? Now, what could cause a hub to allow all communication through a port connected to an ISDN router but not a 1720 router, when they both work with a crossed cable and a switch? I did by the way also clear the arp cache on all my devices on the network, even though the problem didn't really point in that direction. Anyone has a clue what's going on, or is it something personal that the hub hates the 1720? Thanks, Ole ~~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~~~ NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job ~~~ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19818&t=19818 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Static Route Info [7:19817]
I figured out how to put a description on a static route. I know it probably won't help many of you, but this is one of the anal things I had to do for my boss: ip route 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 2.2.2.2 name static route to web server Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19817&t=19817 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: A plan to rebuild.... [7:19611]
It pains me to respond to this but it has to be done. I apologise to groupstudy for continuing with this. Feel free to just ignore it (which I tried to do). I cannot believe, at a time when the free world should be pulling together, that some people feel the need to inflame emotions and attempt to turn America into an inward looking, solitary nation. I have responded to some statements inline. --- "J. Walker" wrote: > I received this from my sister and I thought it was worth > sharing... I wish you hadn't > JW > > This, from a Canadian newspaper, is worth sharing. America: The > Good Neighbor. Widespread, but only partial news coverage, was > given recently to a remarkable editorial broadcast from Toronto by > Gordon Sinclair, a Canadian television commentator. > > > What follows is the full text of his trenchant remarks as printed > in the Congressional Record: "This Canadian thinks it is time to > speak up for the Americans as the most generous and possibly the > least appreciated people on all the earth. > > Germany, Japan and, to a lesser extent, Britain and Italy were > lifted out of the debris of war by the Americans who poured in > billions of dollars and forgave other billions in debts. This makes it sound like no other country made sacrifices in WWII! Millions of European men, women and children were killed in that war. Now, WWII would have been lost if it were not for the intervention of the US, the whole world knows that and appreciates it. > None of these countries is today paying even the interest on its > remaining debts to the United States. > > When France was in danger of collapsing in 1956, it was the > Americans who propped it up, and their reward was to be insulted > and swindled on the streets of Paris. > > I was there. > > I saw it. > > When earthquakes hit distant cities, it is the United > States that hurries in to help. The author is obviously the victim of national propaganda. Whenever a natural disaster strikes anywhere in the world the majority of the wealthier nations intervene in any way they can. Britain always makes itself available in these situations - I can name dozens of examples but I don't feel I need to defend Britain right now. > This spring, 59 American communities were flattened by tornadoes. > Nobody helped. Again, in these situations our Prime Minister WITHOUT FAIL offers the help of our military and emergency services and they did so again this week. Our help has been declined by the US which I can understand that but we are always there should our help be needed. > The Marshall Plan and the Truman Policy pumped billions of dollars > into discouraged countries. > > Now newspapers in those countries are writing about the decadent, > warmongering Americans. > > I'd like to see just one of those countries that is gloating over > the > erosion of > the United States dollar build its own airplane. 1) Nobody is gloating about the strength of the Dollar - it is still the benchmark for every currency in the world and will remain so. 2) Hello? Airbus? Hello? Concorde? > Does any other country in the world have a plane to equal the > Boeing Jumbo Jet, the Lockheed Tri-Star, or the Douglas DC10? > > If so, why don't they fly them? Well yes, we do in fact. The new double decker Airbus design is so good that Boeing have pulled out of that part of the airliner market altogether and ceased development of their own double decker concept. Plus, Airbus were the first to use a full commercial fly-by-wire system, which is probably the biggest development in airline technology of the last 10 years. Right now, the Airbus A3*0 series is just as well respected as the Boeing 7*7 series. > Why do all the International lines except Russia fly American > Planes? wrong wrong wrong. Even US lines use Airbus planes - they don't care about patriotism, just profit so, whatever plane best fits their needs, they buy. > Why does no other land on earth even consider putting a man or > woman on the moon? What purpose would it serve? The US doesnt bother anymore and they only did it then to show off to the Russians. > You talk about Japanese technocracy, and you get radios. That is possibly THE most ridiculous statement ever made. > You talk about German technocracy, and you get automobiles. .and the invention of precision engineering which made the next statement possible. > You talk about American technocracy, and you find men on the moon - > not once, but several times - and safely home again. > > You talk about scandals, and the Americans put theirs right in the > store window for everybody to look at. *cough* JFK *cough* > Even their draft-dodgers are not pursued and hounded. > > They are here on our streets, and most of them, unless they are > breaking Canadian laws, are getting American dollars from ma and pa > at home to spend here. > > When the railways of France, Germany and India were breaking down > through age, it was t
RE: 'It's not the US they want to destroy. It's our arrogance' [7:19815]
Priscilla, While I always welcome and look out to reading your comments...How can you rationalize an illogical act? While I do agree, many of us are angry and many are grieving, I completely agree everyone is entitled to an opinion it is the person assuming that they know the USA government or it's citizen's behavior and not to mention, what these terrorist's were thinking! This can only be the case if they are close enough to ascertain such a comment. However, what I took from this person is that they feel we (American citizens) are the problem...not the terrorists. We are the 'Big Bad USA' not the terrorist. Our freedom is the problem, not the terrorists. For God's sake, let's not try to be Psychologist's here and remain Engineers and realize that we're all human and have beliefs and be realistic that their beliefs lean on the underdogs, which are the 3rd world counties, which has Dictators and/or religious beliefs that dictate the direction of their countries and not appreciate the 'freedom' of religion and 'free' speech, and 'free' living as our history demonstrates and embraces. These are two idealism's that cannot mix and as a result innocent people have paid the cost and in part our Government has dropped the ball from the FAA to central intelligence to counter act and/or ignore the threats delivered by these evil, self-destructing people, by not taking them seriously. Ignorance has nothing to do with arrogance. I'm personally so very tired of us making excuses, taking care of other countries when we need help, with our taxes our homeless people, etc., the list goes on, right here and now for our own people, in our own country. Based on the article from 'Canada' which really drives home, the USA have done more than their fair share of assistance, and it is rarely reciprocated, not to mention the various religious organizations, charities and fund raisers for these countries that can't control their corrupt governments and people, when people have given freely, supposedly to those in need. Instead the corrupt people take and take and dribble little to those whom it was intended and later on ask for more funding from the good 'ole USA. The sheer assault on our common good to help and provide assistance and then to take extreme advantage of that generosity by using our educational systems, in which many go back to their countries to help their countries, and/or are able to start and obtain funding and/or government assistance to begin a new life here when we can't even feed our homeless or financially assist the small businesses to get loans to fund their ventures, but other nationalities can come here and get funding and do and then want to come back and Bomb us! Ironically, when you go into these small business establishments, you usually don't see any Amercian's on the P/R! Hey, but that's really ok, isn't it. They're now American citizens, too! My mistake, please pardon my cynicism, I'm really trying to remain positive. If nothing more comes of this to drive home for our people, to be a wake up call, that we should begin looking out more for each other, our families and our fellow American citizens and businesses and holding our government accountable for our tax dollars and security concerns, because we do take accountability seriously here...some heads should roll based on what got thru the cracks! Let's get American back on track for our own social issues, financial dilemmas and political dramas, and once we've paid down our national debt, created more jobs should we then begin planning to help others. This is why I stated earlier, we ARE a Blessed Nation as a whole, regardless if they pay the loans back or not, return the generosity or not, God will and has, despite what has happened...WE WILL OVERCOME! (I promise this will be the end of my venting...thanks for listening and for the positive comments on my previous reply!) Peace to all and God Speed, Aderion Brewer President, MACG Metro Atlanta Cisco Group (MACG) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Priscilla Oppenheimer Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 12:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 'It's not the US they want to destroy. It's our arrogance' [7:19799] The original poster was trying to help us see the point of view of the terrorists. He didn't say that he agreed with them. Understanding their viewpoint will help us prepare for further evil deeds from them and help us defeat them. Know thy enemy. This is logical. What the poster didn't understand is that we are grieving and not ready for logic. According to Dr. Elisabeth Kubler-Ross, there are five stages of grief. 1. Denial 2. Anger 3. Bargaining 4. Depression 5. Acceptance Many people are still in the anger stage. This is not a good time to be sending e-mails. They come out all wrong. Let's avoid the topic until everyone calms down. Peace, Priscilla At 06:57 AM 9/13/01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Ho
Re: blocking music city [7:19806]
Here is a site with a listing of various ports/applications http://www.chebucto.ns.ca/~rakerman/port-table.html I recommend putting a sniffer on the wire and firing up morpheous and see what it trys to attach to.. -Patrick >>> "george gittins" 09/13/01 01:38PM >>> I work for a School District and i was wondering if any one here knew howw to block programs such as Music City, or as know as morpheus, or gnutella. I running cisco equipment 3810 at each site , and a pix. has someone done it or any pointers will work. also we use aol instant messanger to comunicate with the campuses, but we want to restrict users the have aol but using the network to access the internet. its a difficult scenario but would appreciate if someone knew a solution Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19814&t=19806 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: blocking music city [7:19806]
The easiest way is to create access-lists to block the authentication servers (if applicable) or the site itself. Keep in mind that many large sites own an entire subnet of IPs for load balancing so it may require more than just the first IP you see when you ping by name. If it's on a Microsoft network, Profiles can be activated to only allow specific applications to run. Disallowing setup.exe can be very discouraging to users as well ;) PIX can block ActiveX content as well. Lastly, but probably most importantly, usage conduct must be put into place & made known to all users. - Original Message - From: "george gittins" To: Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 12:38 PM Subject: blocking music city [7:19806] > I work for a School District and i was wondering if any one here knew howw > to block > programs such as Music City, or as know as morpheus, or gnutella. I running > cisco equipment 3810 at each site , and a pix. > has someone done it or any pointers will work. > also we use aol instant messanger to comunicate with the campuses, but we > want to restrict users the have aol but using the network to access the > internet. its a difficult scenario but would appreciate if someone knew a > solution Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19813&t=19806 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: blocking music city [7:19806]
Laura Chappell has written a great article on Gnutella in Novell Connection magazine. Her website has info on how to find the article and on what was written. Go to: www.packet-level.com and scroll down a little bit until you see "The pain of Gnutella". Novell Connection is at www.nwconnection.com and the article is in the September 2001 issue. Good luck. Mike Linehan - Original Message - From: "george gittins" To: Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 12:38 PM Subject: blocking music city [7:19806] > I work for a School District and i was wondering if any one here knew howw > to block > programs such as Music City, or as know as morpheus, or gnutella. I running > cisco equipment 3810 at each site , and a pix. > has someone done it or any pointers will work. > also we use aol instant messanger to comunicate with the campuses, but we > want to restrict users the have aol but using the network to access the > internet. its a difficult scenario but would appreciate if someone knew a > solution Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19812&t=19806 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
